Next Article in Journal
Temperature-Responsive Micro-Cross-Linking: A Novel Solution for Enhancing High-Temperature Viscosity and Settlement Stability of High-Density Cement Slurry
Previous Article in Journal
New Dawn in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Advanced Insight into Polymer Hydrogel Research
Previous Article in Special Issue
Self-Healing Oxalamide Organogelators of Vegetable Oil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Observation of Molecular Complexes in Oligo-Phenylenevinylene (OPV) Organogels by Neutron Diffraction

by
Jean-Michel Guenet
1,*,
Ayyappanpillai Ajayaghosh
2 and
Vakayil K. Praveen
3
1
Institut Charles Sadron, CNRS-Université de Strasbourg, 23 Rue du Loess, BP 84047, 67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France
2
Department of Chemistry, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 603203, India
3
CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology (CSIR-NIIST), Thiruvananthapuram 695019, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2025, 11(2), 137; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11020137
Submission received: 20 January 2025 / Revised: 10 February 2025 / Accepted: 12 February 2025 / Published: 15 February 2025

Abstract

:
In an earlier report, we conjectured that oligo-phenylenevinylene (OPV) molecules bearing terminal OH groups may form molecular complexes in organogels prepared in benzyl alcohol. This assumption was based on circumstantial evidence only. In this paper, we report on new experimental evidence by means of neutron diffraction that unambiguously demonstrates this conjecture. After ascertaining that the thermodynamic properties of OPV gels are not altered by the use of a solvent isotope (hydrogenous vs. deuterated benzyl alcohol), we show that the neutron diffraction pattern in hydrogenous benzyl alcohol differs from that in deuterated benzyl alcohol. These patterns also exhibit additional peaks with respect to those obtained by X-ray. Comparison is further achieved with an OPV molecule without hydrogen bond terminal groups. In the latter case, no molecular complex is formed. These molecular structures may have a direct bearing on the differences observed in the gel morphologies.

1. Introduction

Organogels are fascinating systems as they form three-dimensional networks from solutions containing a low percentage of relatively small-sized molecules designated as organogelators or low-molecular-weight gelators (LMWGs) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. In a recent monograph, these molecules were regarded as “chimeras” due to the fact that they simultaneously bear different kinds of interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, π-π stacking, van der Waals, and the like [5]. Due to this unusual chemical architecture, their crystallization habit favours one specific growth face, which results in the creation of very long fibrillar entities that are more or less connected so as to produce an infinite network.
The knowledge of their molecular structure is a topical issue [5,6,7,8]. One specific point raised quite recently concerns the formation of molecular compounds from the co-crystallization of the organogelator and the solvent [5,6]. The expression Molecular compound is the generic terminology for systems that combine two or more molecules under a well-defined stoichiometry, independently of the way they interact. This term is customary in the nomenclature used in temperature–concentration phase diagrams [17]. In practice, several names can designate these systems depending on the type of interactions: crystallo-solvates, molecular complexes, inclusion compounds, intercalates, guest–host compounds, and the like [17,18,19]. Systems formed through hydrogen bonds are designated as molecular complexes, a situation that will be encountered in this paper.
Several authors have already suspected from circumstantial evidence that the solvent is not only a simple diluent but plays a role in the gelation process [20,21,22,23,24]. The existence of molecular compounds has only been recently demonstrated by means of neutron diffraction while investigating the gelation of triaryl trisamide molecules with a series of organic solvents [24,25]. It has been further shown that the occurrence of molecular compounds has a direct bearing on the gel properties [26,27]. Neutron diffraction, by making use of the isotopic contrast brought about by using either hydrogenous or deuterated species, can unambiguously demonstrate the occurrence of molecular compounds [25].
Based on circumstantial evidence, in previous papers, we have already conjectured that the occurrence of molecular complexes through hydrogen bonds in some OPVs should be contemplated [21]. Here, we present neutron diffraction data that definitely establish the existence of these complexes with benzyl alcohol and an OPV molecule bearing OH terminal groups (see Scheme 1). Conversely, we further show that no molecular complex occurs when the terminal group is replaced by a non-hydrogen-forming group [28].
Note that these systems were originally selected in previous papers for their unusual opto-electronic properties [21,28]. In particular, OPVOH gels change colour from yellow to green on melting, while OPVR gels convert from red to orange on melting. The colour depends also on the solvent type.

2. Results and Discussion

The oligo vinylene phenylene molecules investigated herein presented in Scheme 1 are typical “chimera” molecules [5,28]. They consist of a central core made of phenyl groups linked by ethylene groups, and six aliphatic arms containing 16 carbons each. The structure is either completed with two CH3-OH terminal groups that give a hydrogen-bonding character to this molecule (OPVOH Scheme 1a) and that mimic part of the benzyl alcohol or a NCOOC2H5 group (OPVR Scheme 1b) free of hydrogen-bonding character [28].
The present study of the molecular structure has been carried out by X-ray and neutron diffraction in systems prepared from hydrogenous benzyl alcohol (C7H9OH, called BzOHH) and deuterated benzyl alcohol (C7D9OH, called BzOHD).

2.1. Thermodynamics

In a previous paper, we reported temperature–concentration phase diagrams for OPVOH/benzyl alcohol and OPVOH/benzyl methyl ether [21]. The chemical structure of benzyl methyl ether (BME) is very close to that of benzyl alcohol, except that the OH function is replaced by OCH3, which impairs the formation of hydrogen bonds.
The large difference in melting temperature between OPVOH/BzOHH and OPVOH/BME together with the difference in melting/formation enthalpies led us to suspect that benzyl alcohol may form a molecular complex with OPVOH through the formation of hydrogen bonds (see Figure 1a). That the extrapolated melting enthalpy to COPVOH = 1 gives a value much larger than that measured in the solid state for OPVOH/BzOH gels as opposed to what is seen for OPVOH/BME supports the hypothesis of a differing molecular structure [21]. This is further observed for the OPVR/BzOH systems in Figure 1b, where the extrapolated enthalpy is found to be virtually identical to that in the solid state.
Yet, no direct demonstration has enabled us to confirm this conjecture so far. Note that this effect cannot be in any case related to the solvent quality, which does not affect the value of the melting enthalpy.
The T-C phase diagram of OPVOH and OPVR in hydrogenous and deuterated benzyl alcohol is shown in Figure 1. The use of deuterated benzyl alcohol instead of the hydrogenous version does not alter the thermodynamic properties of the organogels. The formation and melting temperatures are identical, as are the associated enthalpies. Comparing the neutron diffraction patterns obtained with hydrogenous benzyl alcohol and deuterated benzyl alcohol is therefore a legitimate procedure, something already well documented [29].
To extend this study further, we have studied another OPV molecule, namely OPVR, where the chemical structure of the terminal group theoretically prevents the molecule from establishing hydrogen bonds with benzyl alcohol (Scheme 1b). As can be seen, the melting temperature of OPVR in benzyl alcohol is lower than that of OPVOH. Unlike OPVOH, extrapolation of the melting enthalpy to C = 1 does give a value nearly identical to that measured in the solid state (Figure 1). In this system, the formation of an OPVR/benzyl alcohol complex is therefore not expected. Here too, there is no difference in the melting properties of OPVR organogels, no matter whether hydrogenous or deuterated benzyl alcohol is used (Figure 1).

2.2. Morphology

The morphology of these organogels is also strongly dependent upon the terminal groups.OPVOH/benzyl alohol have an unusual morphology of these gels, which is of the hub-like type with thin ribbon-like fibrils that radiate from well-identified centers (Figure 2 (top left)). Ribbons possess cross-sections of about 2 µm. Conversely, OPVR/benzyl alcohol organogels display a commonly observed morphology in organogels, namely randomly dispersed fibrils (Figure 2 (bottom)). Here, the cross-sections are smaller as they stand somewhere between 0.05 and 0.2 µm. Interestingly, drying OPVOH/benzyl alcohol gels to perform SEM investigations leads to an apparent collapse of the gel structure (Figure 2 (top right)) unlike what is seen with OPVR gels. This effect may arise from the dismantling of the OPVOH/benzyl alcohol molecular complex in the course of the drying process. This suggests that the simple OPVOH-OPVOH self-assembling process is not favoured.

2.3. Neutron Diffraction for Studying Molecular Compounds

The main technique for deriving the molecular structure is radiation diffraction, and more commonly X-ray diffraction. Neutron diffraction offers further possibilities, especially in the case of molecular complexes, thanks to the availability of isotopic labelling [30,31,32,33,34,35].
In the case of neutron diffraction, the intensity is written as follows [31]:
I q = 1 N 2 i j a i a j e x p i q r i j ,
where ai and aj are the neutron-scattering lengths of species i and j, and rij is the associated distance.
For systems comprising two types of molecules, 1 and 2, (1) is written as follows:
I q = A 1 2 N 1 2 i j e x p i q r i j + A 2 2 N 2 2 k l e x p i q r k l + 2 A 1 A 2 N 1 N 2 m n m e x p i q r m n
where A1 and A2 are the scattering amplitudes of molecules 1 and 2, which are calculated by summing the scattering lengths of their constituting atoms ( A = s a s ) [30]. Indeed, unlike X-rays, these scattering amplitudes are q-independent as neutrons interact only with the nucleus [30,32], whose size is negligible with respect to their wavelength. It is understood that only the terms where AmAn are considered for the third term of Relation (2). Relation (2) can be rewritten as follows:
I q = A 1 2 S 1 q + A 2 2 S 2 q + 2 A 1 A 2 S 12 q
For systems composed of a crystallizable component C and a solvent S, two cases can be contemplated. On the one hand is the occurrence of a molecular complex where the co-crystallization of both species takes place. A complex is characterized by a stoichiometric composition Cγ, corresponding to the number of solvent molecules S per crystallizable molecule C. On the other hand, a solid solution may form where the solvent is totally expelled from the crystal. Note that we use the term “solid solution” in a broad sense here, as it normally implies, as is the case in metal alloys, that the minor component may randomly occupy some positions of the crystalline lattice of the major component. If the solvent can be found in the amorphous domains, as is the case for semi-crystalline polymers, then the use of this term is legitimate [36]. Now, in the case of organogels, there may not be such domains, so the term liquid–solid system would be more appropriate.
In the case of a solid solution or liquid–solid system, the cross-term in Relation (3) vanishes so that
I q = A C 2 S C q + A S 2 S S q
Under these conditions, the diffraction pattern I(q) of the crystals from molecule C does not depend on the value of the scattering amplitude of AS (no change in the peak intensity nor in peak number).
In the case of molecular complexes, the cross-term cannot be neglected any longer. Also, there are two types of solvent molecules if the concentration is below the stoichiometric composition: those remaining liquid and those participating in the co-crystals. The intensity is written as follows:
I q = A C 2 S C q + A S 2 S S c o q + A S 2 S S l i q q + 2 A C A S S C S q
where S S c o q is the diffraction arising from the solvent molecules belonging to the molecular complex and thus being organized, while S S l i q q corresponds to the diffraction of solvent molecules in the liquid phase. As a result, the diffracted intensity from the molecular complex reads
I c o m p q = A C 2 S A q + A S 2 S S c o q + 2 A C A S S C S q
Therefore, modifying the scattering amplitude of the solvent molecules results in altering the diffraction pattern of the system, such as the appearance or disappearance of peaks as well as modification in relative intensities [25,33]. Note that the use of isotopes does not change the molecular structure [25,32,33].
Neutron diffraction therefore allows one to qualitatively and straightforwardly distinguish a solid solution from a molecular complex thanks to the availability of hydrogenous and deuterated solvents.

2.4. Diffraction Data

The diffraction data have all been recorded in a domain of transfer momentum q ( q = 4 π λ sin θ 2 ) (λ = wavelength, θ = scattering angle) ranging from 0.5 to 10 nm−1. As the solvent displays a nearly flat scattering pattern in the q-range of interest, only the empty cell has been subtracted from the raw spectra. As a result, the slight upturn of the base line at larger q is due to the coherent scattering of the solvent. Indeed, the solvent will give a large “bump” peaking at about q = 5.7 nm−1 arising from its liquid order.
There is a significant difference between the diffraction patterns recorded by X-ray and by neutrons for the OPVOH/benzyl alcohol systems, as seen in Figure 3a. While there is only one peak at q = 1.405 nm−1 for the X-ray pattern, other peaks appear in the neutron patterns. A weak peak is seen for OPVOH/BzOHH at q = 2.329 nm−1, compared to three additional peaks for OPVOH/BzOHD at q = 2.329 nm−1, q = 2.79 nm−1, and q = 4.672 nm−1 (see Table 1). Miller indices are assigned to the peaks by taking the π-π stacking direction as the c-axis (Table 1). The relative intensities of the neutron diffraction peaks for each system, I(qi) in %, are calculated by
I q i = σ i / 1 4 σ i
where σi is the surface of peak i as determined by means of a fit with a Lorentzian function:
I q = S B + 2 A π q 4 q q o 2 + q 2
where SB is the flat background (solvent + incoherent), A is a constant, qo is the peak maximum, and ∆q is the full width at half maximum.
The difference in relative intensities between peaks from OPVOH/BzOHH and OPVOH/BzOHD allows one to conclude unambiguously that OPVOH and benzyl alcohol form a molecular complex (Table 1).
The peak at q = 2.329 nm−1 for OPVOH/BzOHD corresponds to a distance d = 2.7 nm, close to the spacing between the terminal OH groups (≈2.6 nm). It therefore corresponds to the 100 plane, which contains the BzOH molecules. The other peaks are simply second orders of the 010 and 100 planes, which shows the high degree of organization within the OPVOH fibrils. A possible model is drawn in Figure 4a showing how the benzyl alcohol molecule can interact with OPVOH.
Drying OPVOH/benzyl alcohol gel, which results in the removal of the solvent from the crystalline lattice, is likely to introduce some local disorganization. This process may account for the observed collapse of the gel morphology.
The outcomes differ conspicuously in the case of OPVR/benzyl alcohol systems. As seen in Figure 3b, the intensities of the neutron diffraction peaks and their positions are virtually identical whether deuterated or hydrogenous benzyl alcohol is used. This demonstrates the absence of a molecular complex in the case of OPVR.
Interestingly, a third peak is observed by X-ray diffraction which is conspicuously absent in the neutron diffraction patterns. This peak corresponds to the 100 plane containing the C2H50 group. The neutron-scattering amplitude of this group is calculated A C 2 H 50 as follows:
A C 2 H 50 = A t o m e a i
where ai is the scattering amplitude of each atom constituting the group.
Equation (9) gives a value close to A C 2 H 50 = 0 thanks to the negative value of hydrogen (aH = −0.375) [30]. This therefore accounts for the absence of the 110 peak in the neutron diffraction patterns.
The results are gathered in Table 2 where the peaks are indexed by again taking the π-π stacking direction as the c-axis. A tentative crystalline lattice is displayed in Figure 4b.

3. Conclusions

The results presented here provide a conclusive answer to a previous conjecture that predicted the occurrence of a molecular complex of OPVOH molecules in the organogelation process [21]. Conversely, the formation of this complex depends upon the terminal group, as confirmed by the outcomes observed in the case of the OPVR/OPVOH gels. This may have a direct impact on the differing morphologies of these gels (see Figure 2): a hub-like type with thin ribbon-like fibrils in OPVOH/benzyl alcohol systems against a randomly dispersed type in OPVR/benzyl alcohol gels, as well as the collapse of the gel morphology of the latter (Figure 2) [37]. The reason why the formation of an OPVOH/benzyl alcohol complex overcomes the expected OPVOH-OPVOH interaction in the self-assembly process remains unclear so far. Most probably, the OPVOH/benzyl alcohol interaction is already established in the liquid state so that the complex forms straightforwardly upon gelling the solution. The propensity of benzyl alcohol to form dimers through hydrogen bonds is a well-known phenomenon [38]. As a result, a benzyl alcohol molecule may indifferently interact either with the OH terminal groups of OPVOH or another benzyl alcohol molecule.
It is worth emphasizing that the existence of molecular complexes has also been recently demonstrated in the case of triaryl tris amide organogels by means of neutron diffraction [24]. The occurrence of molecular complexes is likely to occur in the gelation process of many other systems, which is something to consider when determining the molecular structure, and in accounting for the thermodynamic properties.

4. Materials and Methods

Materials: The synthesis and properties of the oligo (p-phenylene vinylene) gelator (OPVOH) are described in reference [17]. The basic chemical structure of the molecule used in this study is shown in Scheme 1. The solvents used for this investigation were benzyl alcohol (BzOH) and benzyl methyl ether (BME). Hydrogenous solvents of high purity grade were purchased from Aldrich and used without further purification. The deuterated benzyl alcohol, C7D7OH, was purchased from Eurisotop (Saclay, France) and used as received. The preparation conditions for the neutron and the X-ray experiments were the same (quenching temperature and ageing).
Differential Scanning Calorimetry: Diamond DSC from Perkin Elmer was used to analyze the gel formation and gel melting. Heating and cooling rates ranging from 5 °C/min to 15 °C/min were used. Approximately 30 mg of previously prepared gels was transferred into stainless steel sample pans. These pans were then hermetically sealed by an O-ring to prevent solvent evaporation.
X-ray Diffraction: X-ray diffraction experiments were performed by means of a diffractometer developed at the Institut Charles Sadron on the DiffériX platform. The instrument operates with a monochromatic beam of wavelength λ = 0.154 nm and a hybrid photon-counting detector (HPC-Dectrics Pilatus®3 R 300K). The sample–detector distance was set so as to access scattering vectors q = 4πsin(θ/2)/λ (θ = diffraction angle) ranging from q = 0.5 to 10 nm−1. Calibration of the detector was performed with a silver behenate sample. The gel samples were placed in home-made sealed cells of adjustable thickness.
Neutron Diffraction: The neutron diffraction experiments were carried out with D16, a camera located at Institut Laue-Langevin (Grenoble, France) [39]. D16 is equipped with a new curved detector 38 cm high which covers an 86° solid angle with a high angular resolution of 0.075°. This detector is based on the Trench-MultiWire Proportional Chamber (MWPC) detector technology developed at ILL: 6 modules are mounted side by side in a 3He-filled curved vessel [40]. Each module consists of 192 cathode blades positioned every 2 mm, and 192 anode wires spaced by 1.5 mm [41]. The neutron wavelength is selected by beam reflection onto a focussing pyrolytic graphite monochromator. The present experiments were performed with a neutron wavelength of λ = 0.449 nm, giving access to the following transfer momenta range of 0.6 nm−1 ≤ q ≤ 10 nm−1.
Optical Microscopy: Pictures were taken with a NIKON Optiphot-2 equipped with a CCD camera by means of Nomarsky phase contrast. The samples were prepared by re-melting between glass-slides those gels obtained beforehand in a test-tube.
Scanning Electron Microscopy: The electron microscopy images were obtained on a JEOL (JSM 6700F) FESEM instrument. Hot solutions of OPV/benzyl alcohol were drop-casted on silicon wafers and subsequently quenched to 0 °C in order to form the gel network. The samples were then dried under vacuum at room temperature. The dried gels were further coated by indium sputtering.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, J.-M.G.; resources, writing—review and editing, A.A. and V.K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the ILL for allocating neutron beam time on the D16 camera under proposal Nr 9-11-2146. The authors are particularly indebted to Bruno Démé from ILL for his continuous assistance during the neutron diffraction experiments on D16. They also acknowledge C. Saettel-Herr for the DSC measurements, and G. Fleith for the X-ray experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Terech, P.; Weiss, R.G. Low molecular mass gelators of organic liquids and the properties of their gels. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 3133–3159. [Google Scholar]
  2. Terech, P.; Weiss, R.G. (Eds.) Molecular Gels: Materials with Self-Assembled Fibrillar Networks; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu, X.L.; Li, J.L. Soft Fibrillar Materials: Fabrication and Applications; Wiley-VCH: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Weiss, R.G. The past, present and future of molecular gels. What is the status of the field, and where is it going? JACS 2014, 136, 7519–7530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guenet, J.M. Organogels: Thermodynamics, Structure, Solvent Role and Properties; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  6. Molecular Gels, Structure and Dynamics. In Monograph in Supramolecular Chemistry; Weiss, R.G., Ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lahtinen, M.N.; Behera, B.; Kolehmainen, E.; Maitra, U. Unraveling the packing pattern to gelation using SS NMR and X-ray diffraction: Direct observation of the evolution of self-assemble fibres. Soft Matter 2010, 6, 1748. [Google Scholar]
  8. Terech, P.; Aymonier, C.; Loppinet-Serani, A.; Bhat, S.; Banerjee, S.; Das, R.; Maitra, U.; Del Guerzo, A.; Desvergne, J.P. Structural relationships in 2,3-bis-n-decyloxyanthracene and 12-hydrostearic acid molecular gels and aerogels processed in supercritical CO2. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 11409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pal, A.; Ghosh, Y.K.; Bhattacharya, S. Molecular mechanism of physical gelation of hy-drocarbons by fatty acid amides of natural amino acids. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 7334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. He, N.Y.G.; Zhang, H.; Ding, L.; Fang, Y. Glucose-Based Fluorescent Low-Molecular Mass Compounds: Creation of Simple and Versatile Supramolecular Gelators. Langmuir 2010, 26, 5909. [Google Scholar]
  11. Feng, L.; Cavicchi, K.A. Investigation of the relationships between the thermodynamic phase behavior and gelation behavior of a series of tripodal trisamide compounds. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 6483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lan, Y.; Corradini, M.G.; Weiss, R.G.; Raghavan, S.R.; Rogers, M.A. To gel or not to gel: Correlating molecular gelation with solvent parameters. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 6035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Collin, D.; Covis, R.; Allix, F.; Jamart-Grégoire, B.; Martinoty, P. Jamming transition in so-lutions containing organogelator molecules of amino-acid type: Rheological and calo-rimetry experiments. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Simon, F.X.; Nguyen, T.T.T.; Diaz, N.; Schmutz, M.; Deme, B.; Jestin, J.; Combet, J.; Mesini, P.J. Self-assembling properties of a series of homologous ester-diamides—From ribbons to nanotubes. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 8483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Armao IV, J.J.; Maaloum, M.; Ellis, T.; Fuks, G.; Rawiso, M.; Moulin, E.; Giuseppone, N. Healable supramolecular polymers as organic metals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Moulin, E.; Armao, J.J., IV; Giuseppone, N. Triaryl amine-based supramolecular polymers: Structure, dynamics, and functions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Reisman, A. Phase Equilibria: Basic Principles, Applications, Experimental Techniques; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherland, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  18. Point, J.J.; Coutelier, C. Linear high polymers as host in intercalates. Introduction and example. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. 1985, 23, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rai, U.S.; Mandal, K.D. Chemistry of organic eutectics and 1/1 addition compounds: P-phenyl diamide catechol system. Thermochim. Acta 1989, 138, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. George, S.J.; Tomovic, Z.; Albertus; Schenning, P.H.J.; Meijer, E.W. Insight into the chiral induction in supramolecular stacks through preferential chiral solvation. Chem. Com. 2011, 47, 3451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Dasgupta, D.; Srinivasan, S.; Rochas, C.; Ajayaghosh, A.; Guenet, J.M. Solvent-mediated fiber growth in organogels. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 9311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kartha, K.K.; Babu, S.S.; Srinivasan, S.; Ajayaghosh, A. Attogram Sensing of Trinitrotoluene with a Self-Assembled Molecular Gelator. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ghosh, G.; Chakraborty, A.; Pal, P.; Jana, B.; Ghosh, S. Direct Participation of Solvent Molecules in the Formation of Supramolecular Polymers. Chem. A Eur. J. 2022, 28, e2022010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guenet, J.M.; Deme, B.; Gavat, O.; Moulin, E.; Giuseppone, N. Evidence by neutron diffraction of crystallo-solvates in tris-amide triarylamine organogels and in their hybrid thermoreversible gels with PVC. Soft Matter 2022, 18, 2851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guenet, J.M. Contribution of neutron diffraction to the study of crystallo-solvates (crystallo-solvates) from polymers and from supramolecular polymers. Polymer 2024, 293, 126638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yao, X.; Collin, D.; Gavat, O.; Carvalho, A.; Moulin, E.; Giuseppone, N.; Guenet, J.M. Effect of solvent isomer on the gelation properties of tri-aryl amine organogels and their hybrid thermoreversible gels with poly[vinyl chloride]. Soft Matter 2022, 18, 5575. [Google Scholar]
  27. Collin, D.; Viswanatha-Pillai, G.; Gavat, O.; Vargas Jentzsch, A.; Moulin, E.; Giuseppone, N.; Guenet, J.M. Some remarkable rheological and conducting properties of hybrid PVC thermoreversible gels/organogels. Gels 2022, 8, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Babu, S.S.; Praveen, V.K.; Ajayaghosh, A. Functional π-Gelators and Their Applications. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1973–2129. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Strazielle, C.; Benoit, H. Some Thermodynamic Properties of Polymer-Solvent Systems. Comparison between Deuterated and Undeuterated Systems. Macromolecules 1975, 8, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bacon, G.E. Coherent neutron-scattering amplitudes. Acta Crystallogr. A 1972, A28, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cotton, J.P. Neutron, X-Ray and Light Scattering; Lindner, P., Zemb, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rundle, R.E.; Schull, C.G.; Wollan, E.O. The crystal structure of thorium and zirconium dihydrides by X-ray and neutron diffraction. Acta Cryst. 1952, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Point, J.J.; Damman, P.; Guenet, J.M. Neutron diffraction study of poly(ethylene oxide) p dihalogenobenzene crystalline complexes. Polym. Commun. 1991, 32, 477. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kaneko, F.; Seto, N.; Sato, S.; Radulescu, A.; Schiavone, M.M.; Allgaier, J.; Ute, K. Development of a Simultaneous SANS/FTIR Measuring System. Chem. Lett. 2015, 44, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kaneko, F.; Radulescu, A.; Nakagawa, H. Simultaneous SANS/FTIR measurement system incorporating the ATR sampling method. J. Appl. Cryst. 2011, 56, 1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guenet, J.M. Polymer-Solvent Molecular Compounds; Elsevier: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  37. Dasgupta, D.; Thierry, A.; Rochas, C.; Ajayaghosh, A.; Guenet, J.M. Key role of Solvent type in organogelation. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 8714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mons, M.; Robertson, E.G.; Simons, J.P. Intra- and Intermolecular π-Type Hydrogen Bonding in Aryl Alcohols:  UV and IR−UV Ion Dip Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cristiglio, V.; Giroud, B.; Didier, L.; Demé, B. D16 is back to business: More neutrons, more space, more fun. Neutron News 2015, 26, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Buffet, J.C.; Cristiglio, V.; Cuccaro, S.; Guérard, B.; Marchal, J.; Pentenero, J.; Platz, M.; Van Esch, P. Characterisation of a neutron diffraction detector prototype based on the Trench-MWPC technology. J. Instrum. 2017, 12, C12009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Buffet, J.C.; Clergeau, F.; Cuccaro, S.; Démé, B.; Guérard, B.N.; Marchal, J.; Pentenero, J.; Sartor, N.; Turi, J. Development of a large-area curved Trench-MWPC 3He detector for the D16 neutron diffractometer at the ILL. EPJ Web Conf. 2023, 286, 03010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. (a) Chemical structure in an all-extended conformation of OPVOH and (b) OPVR. The only difference lies in their terminal groups [28].
Scheme 1. (a) Chemical structure in an all-extended conformation of OPVOH and (b) OPVR. The only difference lies in their terminal groups [28].
Gels 11 00137 sch001
Figure 1. Temperature–concentration phase diagram (bottom) and Tamman’s diagram (top) for (a) the melting of OPVOH/BzOH organogels (●), and OPVOH/BME organogels (); (b) the melting of OPVOH/BzOHH organogels (●), OPVOH/BzOHD organogels (), OPVR/BzOHH organogel (Gels 11 00137 i001), and OPVR/ BzOHD organogels (Gels 11 00137 i002). For the T-C diagrams, lines are guides for the eyes. For Tamman’s diagram, the solid lines are linear fits going through the origin (Gibbs phase rules), while the dotted lines represent the hypothetical behaviour if the melting enthalpy were the same as that in the solid state (ΔHOPVOH = 181 kJ/mol and ΔHOPVR = 98.6 kJ/mol, [21]).
Figure 1. Temperature–concentration phase diagram (bottom) and Tamman’s diagram (top) for (a) the melting of OPVOH/BzOH organogels (●), and OPVOH/BME organogels (); (b) the melting of OPVOH/BzOHH organogels (●), OPVOH/BzOHD organogels (), OPVR/BzOHH organogel (Gels 11 00137 i001), and OPVR/ BzOHD organogels (Gels 11 00137 i002). For the T-C diagrams, lines are guides for the eyes. For Tamman’s diagram, the solid lines are linear fits going through the origin (Gibbs phase rules), while the dotted lines represent the hypothetical behaviour if the melting enthalpy were the same as that in the solid state (ΔHOPVOH = 181 kJ/mol and ΔHOPVR = 98.6 kJ/mol, [21]).
Gels 11 00137 g001aGels 11 00137 g001b
Figure 2. (Top left) optical micrograph of OPVOH/benzyl alcohol organogel. (Top right) FESEM image of vacuum-dried OPVOH/benzyl alcohol; (bottom) FESEM micrograph of vacuum-dried OPVR/benzyl alcohol organogel.
Figure 2. (Top left) optical micrograph of OPVOH/benzyl alcohol organogel. (Top right) FESEM image of vacuum-dried OPVOH/benzyl alcohol; (bottom) FESEM micrograph of vacuum-dried OPVR/benzyl alcohol organogel.
Gels 11 00137 g002
Figure 3. (a) Diffraction patterns for OPVOH/benzyl alcohol for COPVOH = 0.04 g/cm3; black line = X-ray for OPVOH/BzOHH; red line = neutrons for OPVOH/BzOHH; blue line = neutrons for OPVOH/BzOHD. (Arrows indicate peaks seen in neutron diffraction.) (b) Diffraction patterns for OPVR/benzyl alcohol for COPVOH = 0.04 g/cm3; blue line = X-ray for OPVR/BzOHH; red line = OPVR/BzOHH; black line = OPVR/BzOHD. The arrow indicates the additional peak seen in X-ray diffraction. X-ray data are similar to those reported in ref. [21] by X-ray diffraction from synchrotron radiation. Peaks are fitted with Lorentzian functions for determining the relative intensities (solid lines).
Figure 3. (a) Diffraction patterns for OPVOH/benzyl alcohol for COPVOH = 0.04 g/cm3; black line = X-ray for OPVOH/BzOHH; red line = neutrons for OPVOH/BzOHH; blue line = neutrons for OPVOH/BzOHD. (Arrows indicate peaks seen in neutron diffraction.) (b) Diffraction patterns for OPVR/benzyl alcohol for COPVOH = 0.04 g/cm3; blue line = X-ray for OPVR/BzOHH; red line = OPVR/BzOHH; black line = OPVR/BzOHD. The arrow indicates the additional peak seen in X-ray diffraction. X-ray data are similar to those reported in ref. [21] by X-ray diffraction from synchrotron radiation. Peaks are fitted with Lorentzian functions for determining the relative intensities (solid lines).
Gels 11 00137 g003aGels 11 00137 g003b
Figure 4. (a) Tentative monoclinic crystalline lattice for OPVOH/benzyl alcohol gels with a tentative positioning of the benzyl alcohol molecules; a = 2.7 nm; b = 4.89 nm; c = 0.35 nm; α = 79 ± 2°; β = γ = 90°. (b) Tentative triclinic crystalline lattice for OPVR/benzyl alcohol gels based on a previous paper [28]; a = 2.8 nm; b = 4.89 nm; c = 0.49 nm; α = 79 ± 2°; β = 42 ± 2°; γ = 142 ± 4°.
Figure 4. (a) Tentative monoclinic crystalline lattice for OPVOH/benzyl alcohol gels with a tentative positioning of the benzyl alcohol molecules; a = 2.7 nm; b = 4.89 nm; c = 0.35 nm; α = 79 ± 2°; β = γ = 90°. (b) Tentative triclinic crystalline lattice for OPVR/benzyl alcohol gels based on a previous paper [28]; a = 2.8 nm; b = 4.89 nm; c = 0.49 nm; α = 79 ± 2°; β = 42 ± 2°; γ = 142 ± 4°.
Gels 11 00137 g004
Table 1. Positions of the peaks for OPVOH/BzOHH and OPVOH/BzOHD together with the distances calculated by means of Bragg’s law, the corresponding crystallographic planes, and their relative intensities as calculated by Relation (7) (see text for details).
Table 1. Positions of the peaks for OPVOH/BzOHH and OPVOH/BzOHD together with the distances calculated by means of Bragg’s law, the corresponding crystallographic planes, and their relative intensities as calculated by Relation (7) (see text for details).
Peak Position
(nm−1)
dhkl
(nm)
hklRelative Intensity I(qi) in (%) BzOHDRelative Intensity I(qi) in (%) BzOHH
1.405 (also X-ray)4.4720106495
2.3292.698100285
2.7902.2520203-
4.6721.3452005-
Table 2. Positions of the X-ray and neutron diffraction peaks for OPVR/BzOH together with the distances calculated by means of Bragg’s law, and the corresponding crystallographic planes.
Table 2. Positions of the X-ray and neutron diffraction peaks for OPVR/BzOH together with the distances calculated by means of Bragg’s law, and the corresponding crystallographic planes.
X-Ray Peak
(nm−1)
Neutron Peak
(nm−1)
dhkl
(nm)
hkl
2.192.202.87 ± 0.1010
2.894/2.17100
4.44.441.42 ± 0.5020
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guenet, J.-M.; Ajayaghosh, A.; Praveen, V.K. Observation of Molecular Complexes in Oligo-Phenylenevinylene (OPV) Organogels by Neutron Diffraction. Gels 2025, 11, 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11020137

AMA Style

Guenet J-M, Ajayaghosh A, Praveen VK. Observation of Molecular Complexes in Oligo-Phenylenevinylene (OPV) Organogels by Neutron Diffraction. Gels. 2025; 11(2):137. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11020137

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guenet, Jean-Michel, Ayyappanpillai Ajayaghosh, and Vakayil K. Praveen. 2025. "Observation of Molecular Complexes in Oligo-Phenylenevinylene (OPV) Organogels by Neutron Diffraction" Gels 11, no. 2: 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11020137

APA Style

Guenet, J.-M., Ajayaghosh, A., & Praveen, V. K. (2025). Observation of Molecular Complexes in Oligo-Phenylenevinylene (OPV) Organogels by Neutron Diffraction. Gels, 11(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11020137

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop