Next Article in Journal
Technological and Organoleptic Parameters of Craft Beer Fortified with Powder of the Culinary–Medicinal Mushroom Pleurotus eryngii
Previous Article in Journal
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Alter Arsenic Translocation Characteristics of Iris tectorum Maxim.
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Identification and Comparative Analysis of Non-Coding RNAs in Spores and Mycelia of Penicillium expansum

J. Fungi 2023, 9(10), 999; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9100999
by Tongfei Lai 1, Qinru Yu 1, Jingjing Pan 1, Jingjing Wang 1, Zhenxing Tang 2, Xuelian Bai 1, Lue Shi 1 and Ting Zhou 1,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Fungi 2023, 9(10), 999; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9100999
Submission received: 19 June 2023 / Revised: 22 September 2023 / Accepted: 25 September 2023 / Published: 9 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Fungal Genomics, Genetics and Molecular Biology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In general, the presented work is scientifically interesting. The identification of deferentially expressed genes in several fungal processes are important to determine pathological mechanisms such as fruit infection. However, this manuscript must be improved. 

Major Comments:

The identification of mRNA deferentially expressed between spores and mycelia of the fungus P. expansum, showed several mRNAs and lncRNAs changing their expression. At least 9 of these genes were randomly chosen and evaluated by qPCR to confirm transcriptomic data. However, transcriptomic of the other non-coding RNAs, such as miRNAs, are not validated through qPCR or Northern Blot. It is fundamental to demonstrate that bioinformatic data are coherent with experimental results. 

Minor Comments:

1. Figure 3 requires the addition of the name or code of each genes. I think that use RSG is not enough and it is hard to understand these results. It is importan identify in the same figure if the RSG is a mRNA or a lncRNA.

2. The legend of Figure 5 is very short. It is necessary the addition of relevant information to expand the legend. 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Pathogenecity is a complex mechanism. In this study, the main sample  isolation of fungus from infected apple not clearly explain. How about environmanetal issue, media issue, how about normal fungal gene expression that not infected with apple did not well explain or ignored . Comments can find the the manuscript.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The new version of the manuscript is better than the original. Congratulations to the authors for the improvement of the work.

Reviewer 2 Report

Received the corrections

Back to TopTop