Frequency and Clinical Features of Candida Bloodstream Infection Originating in the Urinary Tract
1
Infectious Disease Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel
2
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(2), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020123
Submission received: 29 December 2021
/
Revised: 21 January 2022
/
Accepted: 25 January 2022
/
Published: 27 January 2022
Abstract
:The urinary tract is considered an uncommon source of Candida bloodstream infection (CBSI). We aimed to determine the source of CBSI in hospitalized patients, and to compare clinical and microbiological features of CBSI originating in the urinary tract (U-CBSI) and non-urinary CBSI (NU-CBSI). Of 134 patients with CBSI, 28 (20.8%) met criteria for U-CBSI, 34 (25.3%) had vascular catheter-related CBSI and 21 (15.6%) had a gastrointestinal origin. Compared to NU-CBSI patients, patients with U-CBSI were older with higher rates of dementia. Bladder catheterization for urinary retention and insertion of ureteral stents or nephrostomies were risk factors for U-CBSI. Fifty percent of U-CBSI cases occurred within 48 h of hospital admission, versus 16.9% of NU-CBSI (p < 0.0001). The mortality rate was lowest for CBSI originating in the urinary tract and highest for CBSI of undetermined origin. CBSI of undetermined origin remained associated with higher mortality in a Cox regression model that included age, Candida species, Pitt bacteremia score and neutropenia as explanatory variables. U-CBSI may be increasing in frequency, reflecting extensive use of bladder catheters and urologic procedures in elderly debilitated patients. Distinct clinical features are relevant to the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of U-CBSI.
1. Introduction
Candida species are among the most frequent causes of bloodstream infections in hospitalized patients [1,2,3,4], and are associated with the highest case-fatality rate of all common nosocomial pathogens [1,5]. While the annual incidence and fatality rate have decreased over the past decade, candidemia remains an important cause of morbidity, mortality and healthcare expenditure [6,7].
Candida bloodstream infection (CBSI) is thought to arise endogenously from the gastrointestinal tract, with the skin being a less frequent source of infection [8]. Candida spp. frequently colonize the skin and mucosal surfaces, and factors contributing to dysbiosis and fungal overgrowth, breaches in the integrity of the mucosal barrier or skin, and impaired innate immunity may lead to fungal invasion of the bloodstream and sepsis [2]. Well characterized risk factors include exposure to broad spectrum antibiotics, gastrointestinal surgery, chemotherapy-induced mucositis, central venous catheterization and neutropenia [2].
While Candida spp. are frequently isolated from the urine of hospitalized patients, the urinary tract is regarded as an infrequent source of CBSI in adults [9]. Patients with candiduria typically have multiple comorbidities, notably diabetes mellitus, malignancy and recent antibiotic treatment, and most have indwelling bladder catheters [9,10]. Most cases of candiduria clear spontaneously or after removal of a bladder catheter [9]. In longitudinal studies, the frequency of candidemia among patients with candiduria ranged from 1.3% in a general hospital population [9] to 8% in ICU patients [11]. Ascending infection and candidemia are usually associated with urinary tract obstruction and stasis [9,10,12,13].
Nosocomial candiduria is increasing in frequency [14], with some centers now reporting Candida spp. as the most frequent pathogens cultured from the urine of critically ill patients [15]. This trend, driven by extensive use of bladder catheters in elderly debilitated patients [16], together with improved prevention of vascular catheter-related bloodstream infections [7], may increase the importance of the urinary tract as a source of candidemia. In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency of the urinary tract as a source of candidemia, and to compare risk factors, clinical features and outcomes between candidemia of urinary and non-urinary origin.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Population
This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with microbiologically diagnosed Candida bloodstream infection, admitted to the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (TASMC), a tertiary-level academic hospital in Tel Aviv, Israel. The aim was to compare risk factors, clinical features and outcomes between patients with urinary source (U-) CBSI and non-urinary source (NU-) CBSI. We included hospitalized adults (≥18 years) with CBSI, defined as at least one blood culture growing Candida spp., admitted from January 2017 to December 2020. Patients meeting study inclusion criteria were identified by querying the computerized microbiology laboratory databases.
We defined U-CBSI based on criteria proposed by Cuervo et al. [17], with modification: An episode of candidemia fulfilling at least two of the following criteria, concomitant with the onset of candidemia: 1. Signs and symptoms of upper urinary tract infection (flank pain and tenderness); 2. transurethral instrumentation; 3. recovery of the same Candida species from blood and urine cultures obtained within 24 h of the onset of candidemia; and 4. radiological (ultrasound or computed tomography) findings supporting UTI (abscess, evidence of pyelonephritis, etc.); and no alternative explanation for CBSI. The microbiological criterion (criterion 3) was not a requirement. We therefore defined U-CBSI as probable if the same Candida species was recovered from urine and blood, and presumptive if this criterion was not met. Cases of NU-CBSI were further classified as candidemia originating from the gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary tract, central vascular catheter associated candidemia and candidemia of undetermined origin (Table S1). All cases were reviewed by two study investigators (RB and ME), and their classification was agreed upon based on microbiological and clinical data.
Clinical outcomes compared between groups were 30 day mortality, length of hospitalization, presence of metastatic Candida infection (endophthalmitis, endocarditis or infection of other organs or sterile sites), hemodynamic shock and need for vasopressor treatment, need for mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury (assessed using RIFLE criteria [18]), duration of fever ≥38.0 °C and relapsed infection. Relapsed infection was defined as a second episode of candidemia that occurred at least 7 days after the last positive blood culture positive for Candida spp. and within 90 days of the first candidemia episode.
This study was reviewed and approved by the TASMC ethics committee (approval no. 0059-18-TLV). Requirement for informed consent was waived considering the retrospective observational nature of the study.
2.2. Data Collection
Data were retrieved from the hospital electronic medical record system and laboratory computerized database. Collected covariates included demographic data, comorbidities (quantified using the Charlson comorbidity score [19]), general risk factors for CBSI (central vascular catheterization, parenteral nutrition, hemodialysis, abdominal surgery, gastrointestinal leak, neutropenia, ICU stay, chemotherapy and other immunosuppressive therapy) and specific risk factors for urogenital candidiasis (urinary Candida colonization, urinary tract obstruction, bladder catheterization and other urologic procedures). Severity of sepsis was assessed using the Pitt bacteremia score [20].
CBSI was defined as hospital-acquired when the index culture was collected >48 h after admission. Presence of metastatic infection, including ocular candidiasis and endocarditis, was determined from medical records. Endocarditis was defined according to Dukes criteria [21].
2.3. Microbiological Methods
Blood culture bottles were incubated in the BacT/Alert Virtuo system (bioMerieux, Marcy L’Etoile, France) for up to 5 days. Culture time-to-positivity was determined and recorded by the BacT/Alert system. Semi-quantitative urine cultures were performed using the Diaslide device (Novamed, Jerusalem, Israel), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Colony densities consistent with ≥103 CFU/mL were reported as positive. Semiquantitative culture of extracted central vascular catheter tips was performed using the plate-roll method [22]. The tip was considered positive if 15 or more colonies were detected after overnight incubation on blood agar. Candida species were identified using growth on CHROMagar Candida (CHROMagar, Paris, France), the Vitek 2 system with the ID-YST card (bioMerieux) and VITEK MS (bioMerieux). Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed using Vitek 2 and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints [23]. Concomitant bacterial bloodstream infection was defined as the presence of pathogenic bacteria in blood culture taken 72 h before or after index Candida culture. Non-recurring growth in blood culture of bacteria included on the NHSN list of common commensals [24] was considered a contaminant.
2.4. Statistical Analyses
Patient, disease and treatment variables were described within each patient cohort (U-CBSI and NU-CBSI), using number (percentage) for categorical variables, and value (interquartile range (IQR)) for continuous variables. Between-group differences were assessed using Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, and Student’s t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test for normally and non-normally distributed continuous variables, respectively.
Survival analyses were performed by plotting Kaplan–Meier curves and using the log-rank test to determine the effect of source of candidemia and other covariates on survival curves. Variables found to be significantly associated with all-cause mortality (p < 0.1) were further assessed using Cox proportional hazards modeling. The proportional hazards assumption was checked for each model by testing the time-dependence of covariates and by assessing Schoenfeld residuals after model fitting.
A type I error of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Calculations were done in Stata 15.0 (Statacorp, College Station, TX, USA).
3. Results
The study cohort included 134 patients with CBSI (median age was 71 years, range, 18–95 years, 53 (39.5%) females and 81 (60.4%) males). Twenty-eight patients (20.8%) met the criteria for U-CBSI; 23 patients (17.1%) had probable U-CBSI and 5 (3.7%) had presumptive U-CBSI (Tables S1 and S2). Among the 106 patients with NU-CBSI, 55 (41.7%) had an identifiable source of candidemia: 34 (32.0%) with vascular catheter-related candidemia, 14 (13.2%) with gastrointestinal origin and 7 (6.6%) with hepatobiliary origin of candidemia. Neutropenia was present in 16 patients (11.9%) (Table 1 and Table S2).
Patients with U-CBSI were older than patients with NU-CBSI (median age, 80 years versus 69.5 years, p = 0.011) and had higher rates of dementia (42.8% versus 16.0%, p = 0.004). Compared to patients with NU-CBSI, patients with U-CBSI were more likely to be hospitalized in medicine wards and less likely to be in intensive care units or the hematology department (p = 0.004) (Table 1). Candidemia occurred earlier in the hospital stay for U-CBSI compared to NU-CBSI (median time from admission, 2.5 days versus 11 days, respectively; p = 0.0002). CBSI was detected within 2 days of hospital admission in 14 patients U-CBSI (50%) and 18 patients (16.9%) with NU-CBSI (p < 0.0001). Most cases of U-CBSI on admission were observed in patients admitted with urinary bladder outlet obstruction and treated with insertion of a bladder catheter or exchange of an obstructed catheter (Table S2).
Most known risk factors for invasive candidiasis, including abdominal surgery, gastrointestinal leak, intraabdominal infection, enteral feeding, neutropenia, ICU stay and mechanical ventilation, were significantly less frequent in patients with U-CBSI than in those with NU-CBSI (Table 1). Sixteen patients (11.9%) had Candida urinary colonization prior to infection, with no difference between groups. Prior urologic surgery was more frequent for U-CBSI than NU-CBSI (28.5% versus 6.6%, respectively; p = 0.003). Bladder catheter was present at the time of infection in 93 patients (69.4%), with no significant difference between groups. However, bladder catheterization for urinary retention was significantly more frequent for U-CBSI (odds ratio (OR) 5.0, p = 0.002), whereas bladder catheter insertion for monitoring urinary output was more frequent for NU-CBSI (OR 0.6, p = 0.033). Nephrostomy tubes and ureteral stents were significantly more frequent for patients with U-CBSI (OR 13.2, p < 0.0001 and OR 4.5, p = 0.011, respectively; Table 1).
The severity of sepsis, assessed using the Pitt bacteremia score, was greater for NU-CBSI than for U-CBSI (median score, 3 versus 1, p = 0.014). Patients with U-CBSI were more likely to be febrile than were patients with NU-CBSI (67.8% versus 41.5%, p = 0.019). Other clinical features, including proportion of patients with hemodynamic shock, acute kidney injury and duration of fever, were similar between groups (Table 1).
The main Candida species in this cohort were C. glabrata (n = 58, 43.3%), C. albicans (n = 40, 29.8%), C. tropicalis (n = 15, 11.2%), C. parapsilosis (n = 11, 8.2%) and C. krusei (n = 7, 5.2%) (Table 2). Time to blood culture positivity was similar between groups (Table 1). Twenty-one patients (15.6%) had concurrent bacteremia, which was more frequent for U-CBSI than for NU-CBSI (28.5% versus 12.2%, p = 0.044). Fourteen isolates (10.5%) were resistant to fluconazole (C. krusei, n = 7; C. parapsilosis, n = 4; and one each of C. albicans, C. glabrata and C. tropicalis). None of the isolates were resistant to echinocandins. All fluconazole resistant isolates were from patients with NU-CBSI (13.2% versus 0%; p = 0.041).
Primary antifungal treatment consisted of an echinocandin (58 patients, 43.2%), fluconazole (50 patients, 37.3%) and liposomal amphotericin B (3 patients, 2.2%) (Table 1). Twenty-three patients (17.1%) did not receive any antifungal treatment, most due to death before the detection of yeast in blood cultures or decision to provide only palliative care. Use of antifungal drugs was not significantly different for U-CBSI and NU-CBSI.
Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower for U-CBSI versus NU-CBSI (32.1% versus 53.7%, log-rank test, p = 0.033). Within the NU-CBSI group, 30-day mortality was 44.1%, 47.6% and 62.7% for candidemia associated with vascular catheter, gastrointestinal tract and undetermined source, respectively (Table 3, Figure 1). CBSI of undetermined source remained significantly associated with mortality in a Cox regression survival model, which included as covariates age, Pitt bacteremia score, neutropenia and infection with C. tropicalis (Table 4). The mortality rate was not significantly different for primary treatment with echinocandins versus fluconazole for either U-CBSI or NU-CBSI.
The median time to clearance of Candida spp. from the bloodstream was 6 days (interquartile range, 4 to 9 days), and was similar between groups. Patients with U-CBSI had significantly shorter hospital stays compared to patients with NU-CBSI (median of 17 days versus 32 days, p = 0.007). The rates of metastatic infection (endocarditis and endophthalmitis) were low (6.9% and 2.2%, respectively) with no difference between the groups. Seven patients had relapse of candidemia within 90 days, all of them with NU-CBSI (p = 0.3) (Table 3).
4. Discussion
In this single-center observational study, the urinary tract was a frequent source of candidemia, accounting for 20.8% of cases, second to vascular catheter-related candidemia, and more frequent than candidemia originating from the gastrointestinal tract. U-CBSI had distinct risk factors and clinical features, and lacked association with many of the well-described risk factors for candidemia, such as vascular catheters, abdominal surgery and ICU stay. Candidemia at the time of hospital admission was strongly associated with U-CBSI, requiring a high level of clinical suspicion to avoid delays in treatment.
The frequency of U-CBSI in this cohort was higher than that reported in other studies that analyzed sources of candidemia. Ang et al. [10] reviewed data from the Mayo clinic, 1985 to 1987, and found that 26 of 249 episodes of candidemia (10.4%) originated in the urinary tract. Cuervo et al. [17] analyzed cases of candidemia from 9 hospitals in Spain and Argentina (2006 to 2015), using case definitions which we adopted and modified; 128 of 2176 episodes of candidemia (5.8%) were classified as originating in the urinary tract. The higher frequency of U-CBSI in the present study may represent regional differences in the utilization of bladder catheters and variable case definitions. It is notable, however, that there are relatively few epidemiological data on the frequency of U-CBSI. For example, clinical studies of invasive candidiasis often do not specifically address the source of candidemia as a relevant variable, and contain no information on procedures involving the urinary tract [25,26,27].
Our findings suggest that the source of candidemia affects both the clinical presentation and outcome of bloodstream infection. Patients with U-CBSI were significantly older and more debilitated than patients with NU-CBSI. However, U-CBSI was associated with significantly lower severity of sepsis, measured using the Pitt bacteremia score. The 30-day mortality rate was lowest for candidemia originating in the urinary tract and highest for candidemia of undetermined origin. Candidemia of undetermined origin was significantly associated with higher mortality in Cox regression survival analysis, possibly due to difficulty in achieving adequate source control in these cases.
Previous studies have found even lower 30-day mortality rates for U-CBSI (14% to 19% [10,17], versus 32.1% in the present study). A potential explanation for this relatively favorable outcome is that U-CBSI is associated with a less exuberant systemic inflammatory response than NU-CBSI, as reflected in the lower Pitt scores of patients with U-CBSI. Similarly, mortality was lower for gram-negative bloodstream infection originating in the urinary tract than in cases associated with other sources, including the peritoneum [28].
Ang et al. [10] reported that U-CBSI is generally brief (median duration, one day) and low-grade (median 1.5 CFU per 10 mL blood). In contrast, we found no difference in the time to blood culture positivity between patients with U-CBSI and NU-CBSI and the median time to blood culture sterilization was six days in both groups. It should be noted, however, that C. glabrata was the most frequent causative species of U-CBSI in the present cohort, whereas C. albicans accounted for more than 50% of cases in previous studies [10,17]. We hypothesize that C. glabrata is associated with a more indolent clinical course than is C. albicans, which may result in delayed detection of candidemia and more advanced deep-seated renal involvement. In addition, concurrent bacteremia occurred frequently in this cohort, and might preclude reliable assessment of time to Candida culture positivity. An association between C. tropicalis and mortality, as seen in this cohort, has been observed in other studies [29], possibly reflecting the intrinsic virulence of this species.
The optimal treatment of U-CBSI has not been defined. Echinocandins have been shown to be superior to fluconazole for the treatment of invasive candidiasis [25,30]. However, pharmacokinetic considerations may favor fluconazole for the treatment of Candida urinary tract infections. Echinocandins achieve poor concentrations in urine, but accumulate in the renal parenchyma at high concentrations [31]. In contrast, about 80% of a fluconazole dose is excreted unchanged in the urine [31]. In the present cohort, there was no significant difference in the outcome of U-CBSI treated with echinocandins or fluconazole. Similar findings were reported by Cuervo et al. [17].
Limitations of this study include its single-center setting and small cohort size. The high frequency of U-CBSI observed may reflect local use of bladder catheters and urologic procedures. Further studies are needed to assess whether similar trends are seen in other settings. In addition, drug susceptibility was tested using an automated system (Vitek 2) and not using broth microdilution.
In summary, we found a high proportion of Candida bloodstream infections attributable to the urinary tract. U-CBSI was associated with bladder catheterization for urinary retention, urological drainage devices and surgery. Patients with U-CBSI were older and more debilitated than those with NU-CBSI. Patients with these risk factors who have candiduria and signs of sepsis should be evaluated for candidemia, and empirical antifungal treatment should be considered while awaiting results of blood cultures. The source of candidemia is an independent predictor of patient survival and should be considered in epidemiologic studies and clinical trials of invasive candidiasis.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8020123/s1, Table S1: Definitions used for sources of Candida bloodstream infection; Table S2: Clinical features of patients with urinary-origin Candida bloodstream infection.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization and supervision, R.B.-A.; methodology A.C. and R.B.-A.; investigation, M.E. and R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.B.-A. and M.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (protocol code 0059-18-TLV).
Informed Consent Statement
Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective observational nature of the study.
Data Availability Statement
Supporting data is available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Wisplinghoff, H.; Bischoff, T.; Tallent, S.M.; Seifert, H.; Wenzel, R.P.; Edmond, M.B. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: Analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 39, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pappas, P.G.; Lionakis, M.S.; Arendrup, M.C.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Kullberg, B.J. Invasive candidiasis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 18026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kullberg, B.J.; Arendrup, M.C. Invasive Candidiasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1445–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Magill, S.S.; Edwards, J.R.; Bamberg, W.; Beldavs, Z.G.; Dumyati, G.; Kainer, M.A.; Lynfield, R.; Maloney, M.; McAllister-Hollod, L.; Nadle, J.; et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 1198–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ben-Ami, R.; Rahav, G.; Elinav, H.; Kassis, I.; Shalit, I.; Gottesman, T.; Megged, O.; Weinberger, M.; Ciobotaro, P.; Shitrit, P.; et al. Distribution of fluconazole-resistant Candida bloodstream isolates among hospitals and inpatient services in Israel. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2013, 19, 752–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Strollo, S.; Lionakis, M.S.; Adjemian, J.; Steiner, C.A.; Prevots, D.R. Epidemiology of Hospitalizations Associated with Invasive Candidiasis, United States, 2002–2012(1). Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016, 23, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Suzuki, H.; Perencevich, E.N.; Diekema, D.J.; Livorsi, D.J.; Nair, R.; Kralovic, S.M.; Roselle, G.A.; Goto, M. Temporal Trends of Candidemia Incidence Rates and Potential Contributions of Infection Control Initiatives over 18 Years within the US Veteran Health Administration System: A Joinpoint Time-Series Analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, 689–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nucci, M.; Anaissie, E. Revisiting the source of candidemia: Skin or gut? Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 33, 1959–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kauffman, C.A.; Vazquez, J.A.; Sobel, J.D.; Gallis, H.A.; McKinsey, D.S.; Karchmer, A.W.; Sugar, A.M.; Sharkey, P.K.; Wise, G.J.; Mangi, R.; et al. Prospective multicenter surveillance study of funguria in hospitalized patients. The National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Mycoses Study Group. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000, 30, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ang, B.S.; Telenti, A.; King, B.; Steckelberg, J.M.; Wilson, W.R. Candidemia from a urinary tract source: Microbiological aspects and clinical significance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1993, 17, 662–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bougnoux, M.E.; Kac, G.; Aegerter, P.; d’Enfert, C.; Fagon, J.Y. Candidemia and candiduria in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units in France: Incidence, molecular diversity, management and outcome. Intensive Care Med. 2008, 34, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lundstrom, T.; Sobel, J. Nosocomial candiduria: A review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 32, 1602–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kauffman, C.A. Candiduria. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 41 (Suppl. S6), S371–S376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sobel, J.D.; Fisher, J.F.; Kauffman, C.A.; Newman, C.A. Candida urinary tract infections–epidemiology. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 52 (Suppl. S6), S433–S436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aubron, C.; Suzuki, S.; Glassford, N.J.; Garcia-Alvarez, M.; Howden, B.P.; Bellomo, R. The epidemiology of bacteriuria and candiduria in critically ill patients. Epidemiol. Infect. 2015, 143, 653–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Colli, J.; Tojuola, B.; Patterson, A.L.; Ledbetter, C.; Wake, R.W. National trends in hospitalization from indwelling urinary catheter complications, 2001–2010. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2014, 46, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuervo, G.; Garcia-Vidal, C.; Puig-Asensio, M.; Vena, A.; Meije, Y.; Fernandez-Ruiz, M.; Gonzalez-Barbera, E.; Blanco-Vidal, M.J.; Manzur, A.; Cardozo, C.; et al. Echinocandins Compared to Fluconazole for Candidemia of a Urinary Tract Source: A Propensity Score Analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 64, 1374–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellomo, R.; Ronco, C.; Kellum, J.A.; Mehta, R.L.; Palevsky, P. Acute renal failure—Definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: The Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit. Care 2004, 8, R204–R212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Charlson, M.E.; Pompei, P.; Ales, K.L.; MacKenzie, C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chronic. Dis. 1987, 40, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korvick, J.A.; Marsh, J.W.; Starzl, T.E.; Yu, V.L. Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in patients undergoing liver transplantation: An emerging problem. Surgery 1991, 109, 62–68. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.S.; Sexton, D.J.; Mick, N.; Nettles, R.; Fowler, V.G., Jr.; Ryan, T.; Bashore, T.; Corey, G.R. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000, 30, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maki, D.G.; Weise, C.E.; Sarafin, H.W. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 1977, 296, 1305–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, 4th ed.; Approved Standard M27; National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Wayne, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- NHSN Commensal List. Available online: www.cdc.gov/nhsn/xls/master-organism-com-commensals-lists.xlsx (accessed on 30 April 2021).
- Reboli, A.C.; Rotstein, C.; Pappas, P.G.; Chapman, S.W.; Kett, D.H.; Kumar, D.; Betts, R.; Wible, M.; Goldstein, B.P.; Schranz, J.; et al. Anidulafungin versus fluconazole for invasive candidiasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 2472–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kullberg, B.J.; Viscoli, C.; Pappas, P.G.; Vazquez, J.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Rotstein, C.; Sobel, J.D.; Herbrecht, R.; Rahav, G.; Jaruratanasirikul, S.; et al. Isavuconazole Versus Caspofungin in the Treatment of Candidemia and Other Invasive Candida Infections: The ACTIVE Trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 68, 1981–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pappas, P.G.; Rotstein, C.M.; Betts, R.F.; Nucci, M.; Talwar, D.; De Waele, J.J.; Vazquez, J.A.; Dupont, B.F.; Horn, D.L.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; et al. Micafungin versus caspofungin for treatment of candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45, 883–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kang, C.I.; Kim, S.H.; Park, W.B.; Lee, K.D.; Kim, H.B.; Kim, E.C.; Oh, M.D.; Choe, K.W. Bloodstream infections caused by antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacilli: Risk factors for mortality and impact of inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy on outcome. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 760–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kang, S.J.; Kim, S.E.; Kim, U.J.; Jang, H.C.; Park, K.H.; Shin, J.H.; Jung, S.I. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality in adult patients with persistent candidemia. J. Infect. 2017, 75, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andes, D.R.; Safdar, N.; Baddley, J.W.; Playford, G.; Reboli, A.C.; Rex, J.H.; Sobel, J.D.; Pappas, P.G.; Kullberg, B.J. Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: A patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, 1110–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felton, T.; Troke, P.F.; Hope, W.W. Tissue penetration of antifungal agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 68–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1.
Survival analysis by source of candidemia Kaplan–Meier plot comparing the survival of patients with candidemia originating in the urinary tract (urine), central vascular catheter (cvc), gastrointestinal tract (gi) or an undetermined source (unknown). p value was calculated with the log-rank method for the comparison of all groups.
Figure 1.
Survival analysis by source of candidemia Kaplan–Meier plot comparing the survival of patients with candidemia originating in the urinary tract (urine), central vascular catheter (cvc), gastrointestinal tract (gi) or an undetermined source (unknown). p value was calculated with the log-rank method for the comparison of all groups.
Table 1.
Characteristics of patients with Candida bloodstream infection of urinary and non-urinary origin.
Table 1.
Characteristics of patients with Candida bloodstream infection of urinary and non-urinary origin.
| Characteristic | U-CBSI | NU-CBSI | All Patients | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 28 | N = 106 | N = 134 | ||
| Age, years | 88 (66–88.5) | 69.5 (58–81) | 71 (59–83) | 0.011 |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 19 (67.8) | 62 (58.4) | 81 (60.4) | 0.39 |
| Female | 9 (32.1) | 44 (41.5) | 53 (39.5) | |
| Charlson comorbidity score | 3 (1–6) | 3 (2–5) | 3 (2–5) | 0.74 |
| Dementia | 12 (42.8) | 17 (16.0) | 29 (21.6) | 0.004 |
| Functional status | ||||
| Independent | 14 (50.0) | 54 (51.4) | 68 (51.1) | 0.13 |
| Requires help | 4 (14.2) | 28 (26.6) | 32 (24.0) | |
| Fully dependent | 10 (35.7) | 23 (21.7) | 33 (24.8) | |
| LTCF residence | 6 (27.2) | 15 (16.1) | 21 (15.67) | 0.23 |
| Previous hospitalization (90 days) | 11 (39.2) | 52 (49.0) | 63 (47.01) | 0.40 |
| Hospital unit | ||||
| Urology | 3 (10.7) | 2 (1.9) | 5 (3.7) | 0.004 |
| Internal medicine | 19 (67.8) | 46 (43.4) | 65 (48.5) | |
| Hematology | 0 (0) | 18 (16.9) | 18 (13.4) | |
| Surgery | 1 (3.5) | 7 (6.6) | 8 (6) | |
| ICU | 2 (7.1) | 25 (23.5) | 27 (20.15) | |
| Source of infection | ||||
| Urinary tract a | 28 (100) | |||
| Probable | 23 (82.1) | |||
| Presumptive | 5 (17.8) | |||
| Central venous catheter | 34 (32.0) | |||
| Gastrointestinal tract | 14 (13.2) | |||
| Hepatobiliary | 7 (6.6) | |||
| Undetermined | 51 (48.1) | |||
| Presence of bladder catheter | 20 (71.4) | 73 (68.8) | 93 (69.4) | 1.0 |
| Acute obstruction | 8 (28.5) | 6 (5.6) | 14 (10.4) | 0.002 |
| Monitoring urine output | 11 (39.2) | 66 (62.2) | 77 (57.4) | 0.033 |
| Other indication | 1 (3.5) | 1 (0.9) | 2 (1.4) | 0.3 |
| Nephrostomy | 7 (25.0) | 2 (1.9) | 9 (6.7) | <0.0001 |
| Ureteral stent | 6 (21.4) | 5 (4.7) | 11 (8.2) | 0.011 |
| Ileal conduit | 4 (14.2) | 5 (4.7) | 9 (6.7) | 0.091 |
| Long-term bladder catheter | 1 (3.5) | 6 (5.6) | 7 (5.2) | 1.0 |
| Time from admission to BSI, days | 11 (5–25) | 2.5 (0–12.5) | 10 (3–23) | 0.0002 |
| Time to culture positivity, hours | 47.7 (29–71) | 38.5 (26–60) | 40.5 (28.5–63.5) | 0.11 |
| Presence of fever ≥ 38 °C | 19 (67.8) | 44 (41.5) | 63 (47) | 0.019 |
| Duration of fever (days) | 2.5 (2–3) | 1.5 (1–3) | 2 (1–3) | 0.4 |
| Severity of sepsis b | ||||
| Acute kidney injury | 7 (25.0) | 22 (20.7) | 21 (15.6) | 0.6 |
| Hypotension | 7 (25.0) | 44 (41.5) | 51 (38.0) | 0.12 |
| Duration of hypotension (days) | 3 (2–4) | 3.5 (2–7) | 3 (2–6) | 0.3 |
| Pitt score | 1 (0–2) | 3 (0–6) | 2 (0–6) | 0.014 |
| Concurrent bacteremia | 8 (28.5) | 13 (12.2) | 21 (15.6) | 0.044 |
| Risk factors for candidemia | ||||
| Abdominal surgery | 1 (3.5) | 25 (23.5) | 26 (19.4) | 0.015 |
| Urologic surgery | 8 (28.5) | 7 (6.6) | 15 (11.2) | 0.003 |
| Chemotherapy | 5 (18.5) | 38 (35.8) | 43 (32.3) | 0.10 |
| Neutropenia | 0 (0) | 16 (15.0) | 16 (11.9) | 0.024 |
| TPN | 0 (0) | 10 (9.4) | 10 (7.5) | 0.1 |
| Enteral feeding | 6 (21.4) | 60 (56.6) | 66 (49.3) | 0.001 |
| ICU stay | 2 (7.1) | 37 (34.9) | 39 (29.1) | 0.004 |
| Mechanical ventilation | 3 (10.7) | 47 (44.3) | 50 (37.3) | 0.001 |
| Gastrointestinal leak | 0 (0) | 14 (13.2) | 14 (10.5) | 0.041 |
| Candida urinary colonization | 5 (17.8) | 11 (10.3) | 16 (11.9) | 0.3 |
| Hemodialysis | 1 (3.5) | 20 (18.8) | 21 (15.7) | 0.075 |
| Abdominal infection | 0 (0) | 17 (16.0) | 17 (12.7) | 0.023 |
| Necrotizing pancreatitis | 0 (0) | 2 (1.8) | 2 (1.5) | 1.0 |
| Primary antifungal treatment | ||||
| Echinocandin | 10 (35.7) | 48 (45.2) | 58 (43.2) | 0.3 |
| Fluconazole | 14 (50.0) | 36 (33.9) | 50 (37.3) | 0.1 |
| Liposomal AMB | 0 (0) | 3 (2.8) | 3 (2.2) | 1.0 |
| No antifungal treatment | 4 (14.2) | 19 (17.9) | 23 (17.1) | 0.7 |
| Time to antifungal treatment (days) | 3 (2–4) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (2–3) | 0.081 |
Categorical variables are presented as number of patients (percent) and continuous variables are presented as median (interquartile range), unless stated otherwise. LTCF: Long term care facility; ICU: Intensive care unit; TPN: Total parenteral nutrition. a Definitions of probable and presumptive U-CBSI in Methods section and Table S1. b Assessed during 72 h after the onset of candidemia.
Table 2.
Candida species distribution among urinary and non-urinary candidemia episodes.
| Species | U-CBSI | NU-CBSI | All Patients |
|---|---|---|---|
| N = 28 | N = 106 | N = 134 | |
| C. albicans | 9 (32.1) | 31 (29.2) | 40 (29.8) |
| C. glabrata | 17 (60.7) | 41 (38.6) | 58 (43.3) |
| C. parapsilosis | 0 (0) | 11 (10.3) | 11 (8.2) |
| C. tropicalis | 2 (7.1) | 13 (12.2) | 15 (11.2) |
| C. krusei | 0 (0) | 7 (6.6) | 7 (5.2) |
| C. lusitaniae | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.75) |
| C. dubliniensis | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.75) |
| Mixed species | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.75) |
Differences in species distributions among urinary and non-urinary bloodstream infection episodes were not statistically significant (p = 0.3).
Table 3.
Outcomes of urinary and non-urinary source candidemia.
| Characteristic | U-CBSI | NU-CBSI | All Patients | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 28 | N = 106 | N = 134 | ||
| 30-day mortality | 9 (32.1) | 57 (53.7) | 66 (49.2) | 0.033 |
| Metastatic infection a | ||||
| Endocarditis | 0/16 (0) | 3/27 (11.1) | 3/43 (6.9) | 0.2 |
| Endophthalmitis | 1/15 (6.67) | 0/30 (0) | 1/45 (2.2) | 0.3 |
| Time to first sterile blood culture, days, median (IQR) | 6 (3–7) | 3 (2–6) | 6 (2–6) | 0.9 |
| Length of hospitalization, days, median (IQR) | 17 (9–30) | 32 (15–62) | 25.5 (13–53) | 0.007 |
| Relapse of candidemia in 90 days | 0 (0) | 7 (6.6) | 7 (5.2) | 0.3 |
All values represent number of cases (percent within group), unless stated otherwise. a Percentage calculated out of number of patients who underwent echocardiography and ophthalmoscopy.
Table 4.
Univariate survival analyses and Cox regression.
| Variable | Hazard Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate | |||
| Age (years) | 1.02 | 1.007–1.037 | 0.003 |
| Pitt score | 1.16 | 1.10–1.23 | <0.0001 |
| Source of candidemia | |||
| Urinary tract | 0.53 | 0.29–0.96 | 0.039 |
| CVC | 0.78 | 0.47–1.30 | 0.35 |
| Gastrointestinal | 0.90 | 0.48–1.66 | 0.73 |
| Undetermined | 2.40 | 1.54–3.71 | <0.0001 |
| Neutropenia (previous 30 days) | 2.13 | 1.15–3.94 | 0.016 |
| Primary antifungal therapy | |||
| Echinocandin | 0.69 | 0.45–1.08 | 0.10 |
| Fluconazole | 0.71 | 0.45–1.12 | 0.15 |
| Amphotericin B | 2.29 | 0.72–7.28 | 0.15 |
| Lack of source control | 1.47 | 0.77–2.80 | 0.23 |
| Candida species | |||
| C. albicans | 1.23 | 0.77–1.95 | 0.37 |
| C. tropicalis | 1.87 | 0.99–3.55 | 0.052 |
| C. glabrata | 0.74 | 0.48–1.16 | 0.19 |
| C. parapsilosis | 0.78 | 0.34–1.79 | 0.56 |
| Cox proportional hazards model | |||
| Candidemia of undetermined source | 2.04 | 1.28–3.26 | 0.003 |
| Pitt score | 1.14 | 1.073–1.21 | <0.0001 |
| Candida tropicalis | 2.08 | 1.084–4.013 | 0.028 |
| Age (years) | 1.02 | 1.0053–1.038 | 0.009 |
| Neutropenia (previous 30 days) | 3.28 | 1.69–6.33 | <0.0001 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Elbaz, M.; Chikly, A.; Meilik, R.; Ben-Ami, R. Frequency and Clinical Features of Candida Bloodstream Infection Originating in the Urinary Tract. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020123
AMA Style
Elbaz M, Chikly A, Meilik R, Ben-Ami R. Frequency and Clinical Features of Candida Bloodstream Infection Originating in the Urinary Tract. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(2):123. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020123
Chicago/Turabian StyleElbaz, Meital, Amanda Chikly, Ronnie Meilik, and Ronen Ben-Ami. 2022. "Frequency and Clinical Features of Candida Bloodstream Infection Originating in the Urinary Tract" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 2: 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020123
APA StyleElbaz, M., Chikly, A., Meilik, R., & Ben-Ami, R. (2022). Frequency and Clinical Features of Candida Bloodstream Infection Originating in the Urinary Tract. Journal of Fungi, 8(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020123
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
