Next Article in Journal
Identification of Fungi Involved in Onychomycosis in Patients of a Spanish Rural Area
Next Article in Special Issue
Diversity of Colletotrichum Species Associated with Olive Anthracnose Worldwide
Previous Article in Journal
Severe Posaconazole-Induced Glucocorticoid Deficiency with Concurrent Pseudohyperaldosteronism: An Unfortunate Two-for-One Special
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Species of Trichoderma Isolated as Endophytes and Saprobes from Southwest China
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Wheat Resistance to Stripe and Leaf Rusts Conferred by Introgression of Slow Rusting Resistance Genes

J. Fungi 2021, 7(8), 622; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7080622
by Reda Ibrahim Omara 1, Atef Abdelfattah Shahin 1, Shaimaa Mahmoud Ahmed 2, Yasser Sabry Mostafa 3, Saad Abdulrahman Alamri 3,4, Mohamed Hashem 3,5 and Mohsen Mohamed Elsharkawy 6,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Fungi 2021, 7(8), 622; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7080622
Submission received: 3 July 2021 / Revised: 27 July 2021 / Accepted: 28 July 2021 / Published: 31 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Biodiversity and Ecology 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please, carefully examine the corrections and the suggestions provided in the pdf file to improve the scientific quality of the manuscript.

Attention needs to be paid for the following:

  1. Many terms in plant pathology were misused (e.g., virulence, tolerance, disease incidence vs. disease severity, races of the disease, and many others highlighted in the pdf file).
  2. The Results section should mention only the data obtained, avoiding any discussion which should be transferred to the Discussion section.
  3. The Discussion needs to be improved. The paragraph looks like a literature review.
  4. The figures need to have their design improved for clarity. The use of letters in each graphic will help the reader follow the information easily.
  5. English needs to be reviewed to make the reading more pleasurable. Several grammatical errors were found.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Sir,

            Thank you very much for the valuable revision to our manuscript submitted to the Journal of fungi. Attached here is the revised version of the manuscript amended according to the suggestions of the referees. All changes were highlighted. Please also find our point-by-point response to their comments.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Prof. Mohsen Elsharkawy

Many terms in plant pathology were misused (e.g., virulence, tolerance, disease incidence vs. disease severity, races of the disease, and many others highlighted in the pdf file).

 Done. All the suggested changes were done according to reviewers comments.

The Results section should mention only the data obtained, avoiding any discussion which should be transferred to the Discussion section.

 Done.

The Discussion needs to be improved. The paragraph looks like a literature review.

Done. We summarized the first paragraph and kept only the necessary information that is needed in explaining the results.

The figures need to have their design improved for clarity. The use of letters in each graphic will help the reader follow the information easily.

Done. All figures were amended according to your valuable suggestions. Thank you

English needs to be reviewed to make the reading more pleasurable. Several grammatical errors were found.

Done. The manuscript was reviewed, and all unnecessary sentences were deleted, and the whole manuscript was improved.

Thank you very much for your valuable revision.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Manuscript ID: jof-1306013

Title: “Wheat resistance to stripe and leaf rusts conferred by introgression of slow rusting resistance genes” 

General

This is an interesting study and the authors have collected a unique dataset concerning the subject. The paper is generally well written and structured. Below I have provided numerous remarks to improve the text language. In several instances, I also suggested to cite more relevant and recent literature.

Introduction

Line 35: stable CORRECT TO staple

Line 37: due to CORRECT TO because of

Lines 49 and 50: A limited genetic base, in comparison to broad genetic diversity, is a serious im-49 pediment to breeding for various biotic and abiotic stresses REPLACE BY Compared to broad genetic diversity, a limited genetic base is a serious im-49 pediment to breeding for various biotic and abiotic stresses.

Lines 51 – 54: However, wheat cultivars developed with larger genetic bases are very effective in improving the yield under several agro-climatic environments and resist the spread of diseases in new released cultivars [5]. REPLACE BY However, wheat cultivars developed with larger genetic bases effectively improve the yield under several agro-climatic environments and resist t the main objectives he spread of diseases in new released cultivars [5].

Line 55: more than CORRECT TO over

Line 62: due to CORRECT TO because of

Line 68: Furthermore, genomic DELETE Furthermore

Line 69: possible use DELETE possible

Line 75: In general, using DELETE In general

Line 76: Consequently, incorporating DELETE Consequently

Line 78: the main objectives COPRRECT TO the major objectives

Materials and Methods

Line 83: were conducted COPRRECT TO was conducted

Line 85: at adult COPRRECT TO at an adult

Line 86, 87: Additionally, the molecular DELETE Additionally

Line 95: seven-days-old COPRRECT TO seven-day-old

line 98: strip rust CORRECT TO stripe rust

Line 99: While, they were envaulted CORRECT TO While they were evaluated

Line 104: On the other hand, data of leaf rust  DELETE On the other hand

Line 111: belt CORRECT TO belts

Line 120: Area CORRECT TO The area

Line 135: 30s CORRECT TO the 30s

Line 147: production CORRECT TO the production

Line 152: the two CORRECT TO two

Results

Line 210: high infection type CORRECT TO acute infection type

Line 210: On the other hand, the rest of wheat CORRECT TO The rest of the wheat

Line 212: was able to CORRECT TO could

Line 220: adult stage CORRECT TO the adult stage

Line 225: On the other hand, Misr-1, CORRECT TO Misr-1,

Line 232: On the other hand, Giza-139, CORRECT TO Giza-139,

Line 237: On the other hand, Sakha-94 CORRECT TO Sakha-94

Line 238: adult stage CORRECT TO the adult stage

Line 253: important role CORRECT TO an important role

Line 254: clearly indicate CORRECT TO clearly show

Line 255: evaluating the presence of resistance genes CORRECT TO evaluating resistance genes

Line 269: On the other hand, DELETE

Lines 279, 180: On the other hand, DELETE

Discussion

Line 370: Breeding programs CORRECT TO breeding programs

Line 402: On the other hand DELETE

Line 416: play important role CORRECT TO which play an important role

Figures

Figure 5: It is not clear at 285 bp

 

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Dear Sir,

            Thank you very much for the valuable revision to our manuscript submitted to the Journal of Fungi. Attached here is the revised version of the manuscript amended according to the suggestions of the referees. Please also find our point-by-point response to their comments.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Prof. Mohsen Elsharkawy

Introduction

Line 35: stable CORRECT TO staple

 DONE.

Line 37: due to CORRECT TO because of

 DONE.

Lines 49 and 50: A limited genetic base, in comparison to broad genetic diversity, is a serious im-49 pediment to breeding for various biotic and abiotic stresses REPLACE BY Compared to broad genetic diversity, a limited genetic base is a serious im-49 pediment to breeding for various biotic and abiotic stresses.

 DONE.

Lines 51 – 54: However, wheat cultivars developed with larger genetic bases are very effective in improving the yield under several agro-climatic environments and resist the spread of diseases in new released cultivars [5]. REPLACE BY However, wheat cultivars developed with larger genetic bases effectively improve the yield under several agro-climatic environments and resist t the main objectives he spread of diseases in new released cultivars [5].

 DONE.

Line 55: more than CORRECT TO over

 DONE.

Line 62: due to CORRECT TO because of

 DONE.

Line 68: Furthermore, genomic DELETE Furthermore

 DONE.

Line 69: possible use DELETE possible

 DONE.

Line 75: In general, using DELETE In general

 DONE.

Line 76: Consequently, incorporating DELETE Consequently

 DONE.

Line 78: the main objectives COPRRECT TO the major objectives

  DONE.

Materials and Methods

Line 83: were conducted COPRRECT TO was conducted

 DONE.

Line 85: at adult COPRRECT TO at an adult

 DONE.

Line 86, 87: Additionally, the molecular DELETE Additionally

 DONE.

Line 95: seven-days-old COPRRECT TO seven-day-old

 DONE.

line 98: strip rust CORRECT TO stripe rust

 DONE.

Line 99: While, they were envaulted CORRECT TO While they were evaluated

 DONE.

Line 104: On the other hand, data of leaf rust  DELETE On the other hand

 DONE.

Line 111: belt CORRECT TO belts

 DONE.

Line 120: Area CORRECT TO The area

 DONE.

Line 135: 30s CORRECT TO the 30s

 DONE.

Line 147: production CORRECT TO the production

 DONE.

Line 152: the two CORRECT TO two

  DONE.

Results

Line 210: high infection type CORRECT TO acute infection type

 DONE.

Line 210: On the other hand, the rest of wheat CORRECT TO The rest of the wheat

 DONE.

Line 212: was able to CORRECT TO could

 DONE.

Line 220: adult stage CORRECT TO the adult stage

 DONE.

Line 225: On the other hand, Misr-1, CORRECT TO Misr-1,

 DONE.

Line 232: On the other hand, Giza-139, CORRECT TO Giza-139,

 DONE.

Line 237: On the other hand, Sakha-94 CORRECT TO Sakha-94

 DONE.

Line 238: adult stage CORRECT TO the adult stage

 DONE.

Line 253: important role CORRECT TO an important role

 DONE.

Line 254: clearly indicate CORRECT TO clearly show

 DONE.

Line 255: evaluating the presence of resistance genes CORRECT TO evaluating resistance genes

 DONE.

Line 269: On the other hand, DELETE

 DONE.

Lines 279, 180: On the other hand, DELETE

 DONE.

 

Discussion

Line 370: Breeding programs CORRECT TO breeding programs

 DONE.

Line 402: On the other hand DELETE

 DONE.

Line 416: play important role CORRECT TO which play an important role

 DONE.

Figures

Figure 5: It is not clear at 285 bp

We improved the figure to make it clear.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop