Next Article in Journal
Reflections on Menisporopsis, Multiguttulispora and Tainosphaeria Using Molecular and Morphological Data
Previous Article in Journal
Potential of Anti-Cancer Activity of Secondary Metabolic Products from Marine Fungi
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vitro and In Vivo Anti-Candida Activity and Structural Analysis of Killer Peptide (KP)-Derivatives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Antifungal Peptides

Department of Oral Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
J. Fungi 2021, 7(6), 437; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7060437
Submission received: 25 May 2021 / Accepted: 27 May 2021 / Published: 31 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Peptides 2020)
Fungal infections represent an increasing public health crisis. Not only is there the constant increase in resistance to existing antifungal drugs but there is also the emergence of new pathogenic fungi, most notably the multi-drug-resistant Candida auris. As the most recently developed class of antifungal drugs, the echinocandins, were unveiled nearly 30 years ago, there is obviously a great need for new therapies. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), also called host defense peptides, have been studied for over 40 years as potential therapeutic agents for microbial infections. While the primary focus of research was initially against bacterial pathogens, both the discovery of strongly antifungal peptides, especially in plants and in human saliva, has allowed for the expansion of this research into their antifungal activity. In this Special Issue, numerous peptide classes, both naturally occurring and synthetic, are examined experimentally for their activity in vitro and in vivo against a variety of fungal pathogens. One striking observation is the wide variety of natural sources for the peptides. Ciociola et al. [1] describe the in vitro and in vivo activity of a synthetic peptide that mimics a yeast killer toxin against C. albicans. Further expanding on this concept, Woodburn et al. [2] demonstrated potent activity of novel peptides whose sequences were designed based on the β-defensin structure. Activity was shown against a wide variety of fungal pathogens, from Candida, Aspergillus, Absidia, Fusarium and Mucor species. As plants represent a major source of antifungal peptides, Bleackley et al. [3] focus on a novel subset of plant defensin sequences that are enriched in histidine residues. These peptides exhibit potent activity against both Fusarium and Candida species. A novel source of new antifungal peptides are filamentous fungi. Holzknecht et al. [4] demonstrate the potent activity of a peptide from Penicillium chrysogenum against C. albicans, which acts through both the membrane disruption mechanism common to most AMPs and intracellularly. In contrast to most AMPs, the human saliva-derived peptide, histatin 5, is highly specific for its activity against Candida species. Furthermore, its mechanism of action differs from most peptides, being primarily intracellular. Norris et al. [5] demonstrate a novel mechanism in the presence of zinc that involves the fungal membrane, expanding the numbers of potential pathogenic targets. Finally, Ryan et al. [6] describe a novel method for in vivo testing of antifungal drugs, using small molecule mimics of AMPs in a mouse strain deficient in a β-defensin. Three review articles are also published in this issue, providing the most recent literature on the activity of peptides and their potential as antifungal drugs. Basso et al. [7] discuss a wide variety of AMPs, both naturally occurring and synthetic, that exhibit potent antifungal activity, and which could serve as a template for new drugs. The article by Su et al. [8] reviews the most recent literature on the class of potent antifungal peptides from plants known as Snakins. Finally, Candido et al. [9] discuss the activity of echinocandins and their potential use in synergy with other antifungal drugs against C. auris. We would like to thank all of the authors and reviewers who contributed to this issue, and we hope the information will contribute to the further development of important new antifungal therapies.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ciociola, T.; Pertinhez, T.A.; De Simone, T.; Magliani, W.; Ferrari, E.; Belletti, S.; D’Adda, T.; Conti, S.; Giovati, L. In Vitro and In Vivo Anti-Candida Activity and Structural Analysis of Killer Peptide (KP)-Derivatives. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Woodburn, K.W.; Jaynes, J.M.; Clemens, L.E. Designed Antimicrobial Peptides Against Trauma-Related Cutaneous Invasive Fungal Wound Infections. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bleackley, M.R.; Vasa, S.; Harvey, P.J.; Shafee, T.M.A.; Kerenga, B.K.; Soares da Costa, T.P.; Craik, D.J.; Lowe, R.G.T.; Anderson, M.A. Histidine-Rich Defensins from the Solanaceae and Brasicaceae Are Antifungal and Metal Binding Proteins. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Holzknecht, J.; Kuhbacher, A.; Papp, C.; Farkas, A.; Varadi, G.; Marcos, J.F.; Manzanares, P.; Toth, G.K.; Galgoczy, L.; Marx, F. The Penicillium chrysogenum Q176 Antimicrobial Protein PAFC Effectively Inhibits the Growth of the Opportunistic Human Pathogen Candida albicans. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Norris, H.L.; Kumar, R.; Ong, C.Y.; Xu, D.; Edgerton, M. Zinc Binding by Histatin 5 Promotes Fungicidal Membrane Disruption in C. albicans and C. glabrata. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ryan, L.K.; Hise, A.G.; Hossain, C.M.; Ruddick, W.; Parveen, R.; Freeman, K.B.; Weaver, D.G.; Narra, H.P.; Scott, R.W.; Diamond, G. A Novel Immunocompetent Mouse Model for Testing Antifungal Drugs Against Invasive Candida albicans Infection. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Basso, V.; Tran, D.Q.; Ouellette, A.J.; Selsted, M.E. Host Defense Peptides as Templates for Antifungal Drug Development. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Su, T.; Han, M.; Cao, D.; Xu, M. Molecular and Biological Properties of Snakins: The Foremost Cysteine-Rich Plant Host Defense Peptides. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Candido, E.S.; Affonseca, F.; Cardoso, M.H.; Franco, O.L. Echinocandins as Biotechnological Tools for Treating Candida auris Infections. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Diamond, G. Antifungal Peptides. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7060437

AMA Style

Diamond G. Antifungal Peptides. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(6):437. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7060437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Diamond, Gill. 2021. "Antifungal Peptides" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 6: 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7060437

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop