1. Introduction
Contamination of food commodities by toxigenic fungi and the presence of mycotoxins during pre-harvest and post-harvest has attracted the attention of scientific, political, and economic organizations. Mycotoxins are toxins produced naturally by several types of molds [
1]. Among the group of mycotoxins (aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2) produced by
Aspergillus flavus and
Aspergillus parasiticus, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) has been classified as a class I human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and is reportedly the most toxic [
2,
3]. The aflatoxins produced by these two species are known to affect crops such as peanut, maize, yams, cassava, and cereals, recognized as basic staple diets globally, particularly in Africa [
4]. It is estimated that 25% or more of global food crops are destroyed annually due to aflatoxins [
5]. These economic losses are suffered at a global level with significant public health consequences, and it is estimated that losses due to aflatoxin contamination in the corn industry are between USD 52.1 million and USD 1.68 billion annually [
6].
More specifically, AFB1 production is a serious problem in peanut-growing countries where the crops are produced under rain-fed conditions [
7]. In the United States (US), the impact of aflatoxins could cost the peanut industry up to USD 58 million annually [
8], making it an expensive problem for the agricultural industry. The US remains one of the largest producers of peanuts in the world, with more than USD 2 billion at the retail level and a farm value of over one billion dollars [
9]. Lawley [
10] reported that
A. flavus is the most common fungus contaminating peanuts by producing carcinogenic aflatoxins, which destroy peanut shells before they are harvested. These bacteria also produce aflatoxins, which are both highly toxic and carcinogenic, thereby threatening humans and livestock. Pitt et al. [
11] reported systemic infection of peanuts by
A. flavus in soil and contaminated seeds, and Achar et al. [
12] demonstrated, for the first time using electron microscopy, the seed-borne nature of
A. flavus in Georgia peanuts and the establishment of the mycelium in seed tissues.
Despite the recognized impact and consequences of aflatoxin-producing fungi in peanut production, the measures in place to address this global issue remain limited [
12,
13]. Current strategies to control this fungus rely heavily on synthetic fungicides or preservatives belonging to the aromatic hydrocarbons, benzimidazoles [
14]. Extensive use of these substances might produce several side effects, such as carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, and toxicity to consumers, as well as increased risk of high-level toxic residues in food products [
15]. Chemical methods require sophisticated equipment and expensive chemicals or reagents [
16].
The WHO recommends an integrated approach to control and prevent aflatoxin-affected crops at different stages of production (pre and post-harvest), policies and regulation on the levels of aflatoxin allowed, targeted farming practices, as well as seeking ways to remove the contamination [
1]. A recent development in the field of biological management of aflatoxin in pre and post-harvested crops includes the successful application of competitive nontoxigenic strains of
A. flavus and
A. parasiticus [
17]. The introduction of nontoxigenic strains of
Aspergillus spp. in field studies of peanut and cotton has led to a significant reduction in aflatoxin contamination [
17,
18,
19].
In addition, there is an increased interest in sourcing safer alternate natural products instead of synthetic chemical fungicides to combat
Aspergillus spp. in the food chain. The use of essential oils with antifungal and anti-aflatoxigenic activity, which are environmentally friendly, generally regarded as safe (GRAS), and do not pose health risks, are currently being explored or used as biocontrol agents against this fungus. Several studies have reported antifungal properties of essential oils, with evidence of historical and long-term use of essential oils in human, health, and food settings for the prevention and management of fungal infections [
14,
16,
20,
21,
22,
23].
We investigated the antifungal activities of plant-based essential oils against
A. flavus in Georgia peanuts. The peanut variety used in this study is the Tifguard, runner-type, which is highly recommended for peanut farmers by the United States Department of Agriculture [
24]. It is the first peanut variety known to be resistant to two difficult pathogens; the peanut root-knot nematode (
Meloidogyne arenaria (Neal) Chitwood race 1) and the tomato spotted wilt tospovirus [
25]. In addition, we investigated the mode of action of selected essential oils on the morphological and ultrastructural changes in
A. flavus and their impact on aflatoxin (AFB1) production. Hence, this study moves towards a novel, sustainable, eco-friendly solution to a serious problem of fungal contamination of peanuts and AFB1 production by the
A. flavus in Georgia, USA and other peanut farming communities worldwide.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Isolation of A. flavus from Peanuts
Peanut seeds, variety Tifguard, runner-type, courtesy of Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Tifton, Georgia, US, were incubated on moist filter paper for seven days.
A. flavus was isolated from a contaminated peanut and were directly plated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the plates were incubated with alternate periods of 12 h light and 12 h darkness for seven days. In addition, isolates from the contaminated peanut were compared to standard strains of
A. flavus (ATCC 11498) from the American Type Culture Collection. The fungal colonies were observed under a light microscope (Leica, M13595, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and were identified based on their macro and morphological characteristics such as the color of the colony, conidial heads, vesicle, phialides and conidia, using fungal keys and manuals [
7,
10,
26,
27,
28,
29]. Standard spore suspension of
A. flavus was freshly prepared by the suspension of a loop full of spores from a 5-day-old pure culture plate in 5 mL of sterile water. The cell concentration of 10
−6/mL in photo calorimeter was adjusted by diluting further with sterile water so that the optical density (OD) of the suspension was 0.01 at 460 nm. Yeast extract sucrose (YES) agar was used as a medium for aflatoxin production [
30]. The isolated
A. flavus was inoculated to YES agar medium, and the plates were sealed and incubated at a temperature of 27 °C in a CO
2 incubator (Fisher Scientific, Isotemp, Waltham, MA, USA) for 10–15 days. After incubation, the plates were observed under ultraviolet light (UV) (Spectroline CC-80, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to detect the presence of aflatoxin production. If the mold fluoresced under UV light, it was considered aflatoxin positive and confirmed as an aflatoxigenic form of
A. flavus.
2.2. Selection of Plant-Based Essential Oils
Essentials oils (EOs) reported having antifungal properties against a myriad of Aspergillus spp. were selected. Fifteen essential oils were utilized in this study as follows: cedarwood (Cedrus atlantica), cumin (Cuminum cyminum), citronella (Cymbopogon winterianus), black pepper (Piper nigrum), cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum), cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum), ginger (Zingiber officinale), lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus), orange (Citrus sinensis), spearmint (Mentha spicata), thyme (Thymus vulgaris), clove (Syzygium aromaticum), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus), lavender (Lavandula dentata) and peppermint (Mentha piperita). All essential oils were purchased from Fisher Scientific and Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. The essential oils were emulsified with 0.5% Tween 20 (v/v) stock concentrations of 10,000 ppm for further use.
2.3. Antifungal Activity Assay of Essential Oils
The in vitro antifungal activities of each of the essential oils (EO) from above, at different concentrations, were evaluated by the poisoned food technique [
9]. Known volumes of EO and a commercial fungicide, prothioconazole (positive control), were incorporated into the potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium along with 0.5% of Tween 20 (
v/
v), which acts as an emulsifying agent to get the required concentrations of 125–4000 ppm. Further, the plates consisting of agar medium mixed with 0.5% of Tween 20 (
v/
v) without any essential oil was considered as blank control. A 5–10 µL conidial suspension from a 4–6-day-old
A. flavus culture was inoculated in the center of the agar plates by using a capillary tube. The plates were incubated at 28 ± 2 °C, with an alternating period of 12 h of dark and light for 7 days until the mycelial growth in the control plates reached the edge of the plates. The efficacy of each EO as an antifungal agent was evaluated by measuring fungal colony diameter using a centimeter scale. Percentage inhibition of the radial growth with different oils compared to control was calculated using the following formula: Percentage mycelial inhibition (%) = [(
dc −
dt)/
dc] × 100, where
dc is the mean colony diameter for the control sets and
dt is the mean colony diameter for the treatment sets.
2.4. Gas Chromatographic-Mass Spectrometry of Clove Oil
Based on the antifungal activity of all EOs from above, clove oil was selected and analyzed for its major composition using GC-MS (Shimadzu QP 2010 Plus, Tokyo, Japan), fitted with a flame ionization detector (FID) and Japan capillary column (0.32 mm i.d., length: 30 m, film thickness 0.25 µm). Injector temperature and ion source temperature were maintained at 280 and 230 °C, respectively. The oil sample (0.2 µL) was injected into the column with a split ratio of 80:1. The temperature program comprised 60 °C for 2 min, raised to 250 °C for 5 min at 10 °C/min and 280 °C for 15 min at 10 °C/min. The composition (%) was estimated with peak normalization and assuming its equal detector response for each run. The range of mass acquisition was 40–650 m/z. The peaks were detected by comparing the individual mass spectra with the reference database at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST12 or NIST62) and Wiley 229 mass spectrometry libraries.
2.5. Transmission Electron Microscopy
Sporulating A. flavus mycelia treated with 500 ppm of clove EO were observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Untreated mycelia served as the control. All samples were infiltrated with 1:1 then 1:2 ratios of ethanol to resin in a vacuum from four hours to overnight, then two changes of 100% resin under vacuum four hours to overnight. The samples were then fixed and allowed to evacuate overnight before being placed into an oven to polymerize for three to four days. The samples were trimmed and thin sectioned (~70 to 80 nm) using a diamond knife and RMC PT-XL Ultramicrotome (RMC Corporation, Tucson, AZ, USA). The sections were post stained with 7.5% uranyl acetate and Reynolds’s lead citrate. TEM micrographs of the samples were taken using JEM-1210 TEM instrument (JEOL USA Inc., Peabody, MA, USA) and operated at 90 kV. Ultrastructural alterations of the somatic and reproductive structures of treated and untreated samples were compared to assess the effect of clove EO against A. flavus.
2.6. Scanning Electron Microscopy
Sporulating A. flavus treated mycelia, with 500 ppm of clove EO, were also used for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using standard chemical fixation and critical point drying methods. Untreated mycelia served as the control. Samples were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution overnight at 4 °C. Thereafter, the samples were washed with 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.2) three times for 20 min each. Following this, the samples were dehydrated in ascending ethanol series ending in three changes of 100% dry ethanol for about 45 min. Samples were dried in liquid carbon dioxide and were mounted on a silver stub and gold-covered by cathodic spraying (Polaron gold). The morphology of the fungus was observed using Topcon DS-130F Field Emission SEM/STEM (Topcon Technologies, Inc., Paramus, NJ, USA) and operated at 20 kV. Morphological alterations in the somatic and reproductive structures of treated and untreated samples were compared to assess the effect of clove EO against A. flavus.
2.7. Detection of Aflatoxin by Qualitative Methods
2.7.1. Ammonia Vapor Method
ATCC 11498 is a toxigenic strain of
A. flavus. The ammonia vapor (AV) method was used to confirm the aflatoxigenic form of
A. flavus in contaminated peanuts, variety Tifguard, following protocol of Saito, et al. [
31]. In addition, we determined the effect of clove EO on mycelial growth at different concentrations of the oil. Briefly, yeast extract sucrose (YES) agar plates were prepared by supplementing different concentrations of clove EO: 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 ppm, respectively. YES plates without EO were treated as control. Ten microliters of the fungal spore suspension were inoculated at the center of the YES plates and were incubated at 25 ± 2 °C for five days. Following incubation, each dish was inverted, and approximately 200 µL of ammonium hydroxide solution (25%) was placed on the inside of the lid. The YES plates containing fungal mycelium and spores with different concentrations of clove EO were then inverted on the plates containing the ammonium hydroxide. EO-treated and untreated plates with active colonies were observed hourly for color change. A plum-red color change on the undersides of the plated colonies was an indication of aflatoxin producing strain of
A. flavus isolate. No color change was categorized as a non-toxin producing strain. Mycelial growth was also monitored for plates impregnated with different concentrations of clove EO.
2.7.2. Coconut Milk Agar Method
The coconut milk agar (CMA) method was used to further confirm the presence of aflatoxin in the aflatoxigenic form of
A. flavus in contaminated peanuts, variety Tifguard, following the protocol of Davis et al. [
32]. In addition, we determined the effect of clove EO on mycelial growth at different concentrations of the oil. CMA plates were prepared by supplementing with different concentrations of clove oil: 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 ppm, respectively. CMA plates without oil were treated as control. Ten microliters of the fungal spore suspension were inoculated onto the solidified agar plates and were incubated at 25 ± 2 °C for five days. Following incubation, plates were exposed to 460 nm UV light and observed for fluorescence.
2.7.3. Quantification of Aflatoxin by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
Following incubation of clove EO-treated and untreated mycelia and spores of
A. flavus on YES medium at 25 ± 2 °C for five days, extraction and purification of AFB1 were performed using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC; Waters 2790 HPLC-Photodiode Array UV detector, Milford, MA, USA) in accordance with standard protocols, using methanol as the solvent. Thirty grams of treated (500–2500 ppm) and untreated samples were collected from YES plates and homogenized with 30 mL of HPLC grade methanol. The mixture was vortexed for 5 min, followed by extraction and centrifugation. Extracts of 3 replicates were collected into a rotary evaporator flask, following which methanol was eliminated by evaporation under reduced pressure. The purified AFB1 from the treated samples was placed under a UV light along with AFB1 standard (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) that caused aflatoxin to fluoresce. Purified samples were stored at 4 °C in the dark for a couple of days prior to HPLC injection. A Waters 2790 Separations Module reversed- phase HPLC equipped with a photodiode array detector 2996 set between 200 and 500 nm was employed to capture the AFB1 spectrum in the sample. A Lunar C
18 separation column, 100 mm by 4.6 mm internal diameter, with 5 µm packing material was used. A methanol/ultrapure water (60:40) mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min was used according to Vosough et al. [
33] with minor modifications. The AFB1 standard equation was based on a four-point calibration curve and yielding the equation
Y = 16976X + 8060.1, with a regression coefficient of
R2 = 0.9957. The peak areas obtained from the fungal extracts for the control and clove EO treated samples were used in the regression equation to calculate the concentrations of AFB1.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
Data analysis was performed using statistical software SPSS for windows version 10.0.1 to calculate the means, standard errors, and standard deviations. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to the data to determine differences between treatments with significance levels set at p = 0.05. To check substantial differences between the levels of the mean factor, Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were applied to determine the levels of significance at 5% significance was applied.
4. Discussion
Fungal contamination of peanuts is of utmost concern globally as peanuts are a rich and economical source of protein. The use of synthetic fungicides remains the common measure to reduce fungal contamination in the peanut industry in the US and elsewhere. It is widely known that these synthetic fungicides not only affect peanut consumers, but they can also be detrimental to the environment. Many strategies, including natural control, biological control, control of insect pests, development of resistant cultivar, have been studied for the management of contamination and aflatoxin production in crops. According to Reddy et al. [
34], health hazards from exposure to toxic chemicals and economic considerations make natural plant extracts ideal alternatives to protect food and feed from fungal contamination. Plant-based antimicrobial compounds such as essential oils (EOs) and their bioactive compounds have been identified as potential biological control agents in the reduction/control of fungal contamination and toxin production, and more specifically as alternatives to synthetic fungicides against toxin-producing molds [
35,
36,
37,
38].
In our study, we screened fifteen essential oils at different concentrations against the mycelial growth of
A. flavus in peanuts. The results demonstrate a dose-dependent inhibitory activity of all the EOs tested on the target fungus. Strong antifungal activity was observed in most of the EOs, demonstrated by the growth inhibition zones and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values on the agar media. However, clove EO was the most effective of the EOs tested, against
A. flavus mycelial growth and development, with a fungicidal effect at concentration 500 ppm. The commercial fungicide, prothioconazole, completely inhibited
A. flavus at all tested concentrations ranging from 125 to 4000 ppm. In fact, the fungicide completely inhibited fungal growth at concentrations far below the reported ones. Similarly, previous studies have also demonstrated antifungal, inhibitory, and fungicidal action of different plants, including clove, thyme, cinnamon, lemongrass, tea tree, citronella, peppermint, and oregano oils [
38,
39,
40,
41,
42,
43,
44]. Furthermore, earlier reports have demonstrated greater antifungal activity of thyme, lemongrass, and tea tree EOs against
Aspergillus spp. compared to clove EO [
42,
45,
46]. This is in contrast with our findings, as clove EO was more effective than all tested EOs and caused total inhibition of the mycelial growth. It is worth noting that our study focused on
A. flavus in contaminated peanuts, which is different from several other studies that have investigated the antifungal activity of EOs against
Aspergillus spp. in other hosts. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the antifungal activity of clove EOs has been demonstrated against
A. flavus in contaminated peanuts, variety Tifguard, and our data pave the way to investigate other varieties of peanuts in Georgia.
It is widely known that the antimicrobial activity of essential oils is caused by various components that vary in their composition within the specific oil or other factors, which include plant type, seasonality, region, or location of where the plant is grown. Prindle and Wright [
28] reported that the effect of essential oils (phenolic compounds) is concentration-dependent. At low concentrations, phenolic compounds affect enzyme activity, and at higher concentrations, they cause protein denaturation. Our GC-MS analysis showed that the clove EO was characterized by high amounts of eugenol (83.25%), with E-caryophyllene (13.36%) and α-humulene (2.18%) as marker compounds comprising approximately 99% of the whole oil. The predominantly high concentration of the eugenol is similar to that observed in the study by Pinto et al. [
47]. In a recent study, the authors [
44] found the IC
50 of clove and cinnamon EOs to be >2000 µg/mL; however, the concentration of eugenol in the clove EO was determined to be 54% of the whole EO. This might explain the variations in the dose-responses between their study and ours, with a four-fold difference in the effective dose of clove EO (ppm) required for inhibition of mycelial growth of the
A. flavus.
We further investigated the effects of the clove EO on mycelia and conidia of
A. flavus by electron microscopy. A crucial observation of the ultrastructural changes, under TEM analysis, was cell wall lysis, thinning of the cell wall, cell membranes, and extreme vacuolization of the cytoplasmic matrix of hyphal cells. The most prominent observation was the damage to mitochondria and complete disintegration of other cell organelles, and most importantly, the nucleus was absent. Our observations corroborate the findings by Khosravi et al. [
48]. These authors found changes in the cellular contents, including the cell wall, plasma membrane, and membranous organelles such as the nuclei and mitochondria of
A. fumigatus and
A. flavus, following exposure to the different EOs. According to [
49], the antifungal activity of dill oil results from its ability to disrupt the permeability barrier of the plasma membrane and from the mitochondrial dysfunction-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation in
A. flavus. They further stated that mitochondrial damage leads to loss of ATP synthesis process in the cell, which is required for the fungi. We noticed excess vacuolization in our clove EO treated cells. It is reported that fungal vacuoles are responsible for the synthesis of many enzymes involved in glyoxylate pathways and fatty acid oxidation; thus, damage to vacuoles results in loss of these functions [
50]. The review by Miri et al. [
51] on the effect of essential oils on growth and aflatoxin production by
A. flavus summarized that EOs could also coagulate the cytoplasm and damage lipids, proteins, cell walls and membranes that can lead to the leakage of macromolecules and the lysis. Data from our TEM analysis clearly showed that clove EO caused ultrastructural modifications of
A. flavus hyphal cells leading to destruction and disintegration of the cellular matrix, and these changes may be attributed to a disruption in the enzymatic system of these cells by clove EO. Destruction of the cytoplasmic content might have certainly resulted in disruptions in metabolic activities of affected hyphal cells, ultimately affecting normal mycelial growth as observed in our study. In addition, since in our study, clove EO showed a negative impact on the conidial structural integrity, such changes certainly might have contributed to the mycelial growth of
A. flavus.
The negative impact of clove EO on the mycelia and conidia of
A. flavus was also observed in our SEM study. Our findings demonstrate that morphological alterations were prominent in both somatic and reproductive structures. Zambonelli et al. [
52] observed inhibition of fungal growth, in addition to degeneration of fungal hyphae after treating them with
Thymus vulgaris,
Lavandula R.C. hybrid, and
Mentha piperita essential oils. This type of damage to the hyphal morphology of plant pathogenic fungi following exposure to essential oils has also been reported by others [
53,
54] after exposure to EOs of the
Cymbopogon species. Similar to our observations, the SEM study of
A. ochraceus cells fumigated with natural cinnamaldehyde, citral, and eugenol showed alteration in the morphology of the hyphae, which appeared collapsed, with abnormal branching of hyphae in the apical region and loss of linearity [
55].
Another key finding of our study was that growth inhibitions of the
A. flavus were consistent with corresponding morphological changes of the hyphae and reproductive structures exposed to clove EO. The changes in hyphal morphology were certainly related to the loss of structural integrity of the cell wall supported by our TEM analysis, and further suggests that clove EO might have interfered with fungal wall synthesis directly or indirectly. It has been reported that several compounds of EOs, due to their lipophilic nature, cross fungal cell walls and membranes, interacting with membrane proteins and enzymes, disrupting cell metabolism, ultimately leading to cell death [
56,
57]. That clove EO, an antifungal agent, resulted in both morphological and ultrastructural alterations of
A. flavus mycelium and spores is demonstrated for the first time by electron microscopy in our contaminated peanuts, variety Tifguard.
In addition, after confirming the presence of aflatoxin producing isolates of
A. flavus in the contaminated peanuts by qualitative methods, we further established that clove EO also had an inhibitory effect on AFB1 production by this fungus. Similar to our studies, HPLC has been employed previously to detect aflatoxin production by
A. flavus cultured on CMA and other differential media exposed to ammonia vapor pressure [
58,
59,
60]. Other reports using such techniques demonstrated the potential of antifungal plant extracts against
A. flavus growth and aflatoxin production in crops of economic importance [
16,
34,
37,
61,
62,
63,
64]. Among these studies, some have found that clove oil inhibited the mycelial growth and aflatoxin production of
A. flavus in rice [
16,
65]. The findings in our study support the conclusions of the previous research on the effect of clove EO on other crops, and at 500 ppm and above, a dose-dependent effect was observed, leading to a significant reduction in mycelial growth and AFB1 production. Hence, our study showed for the first time that clove EO showed both antifungal and antitoxigenic properties against
A. flavus in the contaminated peanuts, variety Tifguard.
In the United States, the State of Georgia is recognized for approximately 50% of the national peanut supply, thus aiding the global recognition of the US as the third largest peanut producer [
66]. Despite extensive research by the peanut industry in the US, the use of synthetic fungicides to combat contamination and aflatoxin production is very much in use on a large scale. The roles of essential oils as a biocontrol agent against
Aspergillus spp. growth and toxin production in peanuts are largely unexplored, and our study offers new insight into this area. In addition, none of the earlier reports indicate that clove EOs have been tested for their fungi-toxic and antiaflatoxigenic potential against
A. flavus in peanut growing states. Moreover, we are not aware of any published studies investigating the antifungal effect of essential oils or, in particular, clove against
A. flavus in peanuts of the variety, Tifguard. Hence, we demonstrated for the first time the implication of clove EO on the deleterious morphological and ultrastructural alterations of somatic and reproductive structures of
A. flavus and its ability to reduce AFB1 production by
A. flavus in one variety of peanut. Our findings increase the possibility of exploiting the clove EO as an effective alternative to synthetic chemicals and as an effective bio-control and non-toxic bio-preservative to increase the quality and safety of peanuts varieties in the US and possibly around the globe. Most importantly, eugenol, the main compound in clove EO, can be further exploited to determine the EO mechanism of action and obtained data on its in vitro efficacy in both liquid and vapor form, and possibly finds its way as a lead compound in integrated pest management (IPM) to control
A. flavus and to eliminate the carcinogenic aflatoxin B1 in peanuts.