Next Article in Journal
Detection of Fluconazole Resistance in Candida parapsilosis Clinical Isolates with MALDI-TOF Analysis: A Proof-of-Concept Preliminary Study
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Mycoinsecticides: Advances in Formulation, Regulatory Challenges and Market Trends for Entomopathogenic Fungi
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

From the Ground to the Clinic: The Evolution and Adaptation of Fungi

by
Dario Corrêa-Junior
1,2,
Daniel Zamith-Miranda
2,
Susana Frases
1,3 and
Joshua D. Nosanchuk
2,*
1
Laboratório de Biofísica de Fungos, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
2
Departments of Medicine (Division of Infectious Diseases) and Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
3
Rede Micologia, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro—FAPERJ, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2026, 12(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010008 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 5 November 2025 / Revised: 8 December 2025 / Accepted: 16 December 2025 / Published: 23 December 2025

Abstract

Fungi constitute a diverse kingdom of eukaryotic organisms with remarkable adaptability, ranging from saprophytic decomposers to lethal human pathogens. This review synthesizes current insights into fungal adaptations that underline pathogenesis, focusing on enzymatic strategies including hydrolytic enzymes, metabolic and physiological plasticity such as thermotolerance and nutrient flexibility, and evasion of host immunity via mechanisms like melanin production and biofilm formation. We detail fungal survival tactics including spore formation and genomic and epigenetic plasticity, which contribute to resilience and evolution under environmental and host-imposed stresses. The escalating emergence of antifungal resistance and the global impact of environmental changes underscore urgent clinical challenges. Advances in diagnostics, novel therapeutics incorporating AI-assisted drug discovery, and integrated One Health approaches are poised to combat this growing threat. This comprehensive overview aims to guide future research and inform clinical management of fungal infections in an era of dynamic microbial evolution and environmental upheaval.

1. Introduction: Why Study Fungal Adaptations in Pathogenic Fungi

The fungal kingdom comprises eukaryotic, heterotrophic organisms with chitinous cell walls and diverse morphologies, ranging from unicellular yeasts to filamentous fungi and dimorphic species capable of switching forms depending on environmental and/or host conditions [1]. Estimates suggest 2.2 to 3.8 million fungal species exist, but only about 120,000 have been formally described [2]. Among these, some are pathogenic to humans and animals, underscoring the medical relevance of fungal adaptation.
Human pathogenic fungi exploit diverse ecological niches, from soil and water to host-associated environments, showing remarkable physiological and metabolic plasticity. They have evolved strategies to survive hostile conditions, evade host immune responses, produce bioactive secondary metabolites, and transition between saprophytic and parasitic lifestyles [3]. These adaptations underpin their ability to cause infections ranging from superficial cutaneous mycoses to invasive systemic diseases [4].
The capacity to transition from environmental reservoirs to human or animal hosts involves complex evolutionary adaptations enabling survival under stresses such as temperature, oxidative stress, and immune defenses [5]. Genetic variation and regulatory flexibility facilitate antifungal resistance and emergence of novel pathogenic strains [5]. Metabolic and morphological plasticity, including switching between yeast and filamentous forms, support survival in host tissues and persistence under antifungal treatment [6]. This review focuses on adaptation mechanisms in pathogenic fungal species, emphasizing enzymatic strategies, temperature tolerance, and physiological adaptations facilitating host colonization, integrating ecological, molecular, and genetic perspectives.

2. Hydrolytic Enzymes

Fungi play a vital role in decomposing terrestrial organic matter such as lignocellulose, significantly contributing to nutrient cycling [7]. Their capacity to secrete diverse extracellular enzymes allows for the breakdown of recalcitrant compounds unusable by other organisms [8]. Mycorrhizal fungi mobilize nitrogen and phosphorus from organic sources, influencing nutrient cycles [9]. Decomposer succession with varied catabolic capabilities promotes fungal diversity over time, with soil fauna also impacting decomposer community functioning [7]. Biologically active metabolites suppress competitors and/or predators, shaping community dynamics during organic matter decomposition. Fungal enzymatic diversity underlies ecological success across habitats, including extreme environments, by facilitating nutrient mobilization, substrate degradation, and interactions with other organisms. For instance, hyphal growth and resource partitioning contribute to ecosystem stability and fungal persistence [10].
Pathogenic fungi use hydrolytic enzymes to degrade host tissues nutrient acquisition as well as for facilitating colonization and invasion. Many of these enzymes are homologous to those involved in environmental decomposition but are co-opted to breach human host barriers. Carbohydrate-active enzymes such as cellulases, hemicellulases, pectinases, chitinases, glucanases, and proteases are key players [11]. For example, phytopathogenic fungi use cellulases and pectinases to penetrate cell walls, whereas entomopathogens secrete chitinases and proteases to degrade insect exoskeletons [8], and human pathogens produce glucanases and proteases for tissue invasion and immune evasion [12]. Fungi can utilize a broad spectrum of carbon sources, including simple sugars (glucose, fructose, galactose), amino acids, organic acids, and host-derived macromolecules such as lipids and polysaccharides [13,14,15]. The production of these enzymes is finely regulated by global gene expression in response to host-derived substrates and environmental factors, adjusting fungal metabolism secreting effectors, enzymes, and secondary metabolites to withstand immunity and environmental stress [16].
A key feature exhibited by fungi that survive in different environments is their remarkable metabolic flexibility that allows them to adapt to the variable and often nutritionally limited conditions within host environments. For example, Candida albicans, a species that has adapted to become a human commensal, exhibits versatile carbon metabolism enabling colonization of mucosal surfaces, bloodstream, and internal tissues by metabolizing diverse sugars and amino acids. In contrast, Nakaseomyces glabrata (formerly Candida glabrata), another human commensal, shows a narrower substrate range due to loss of certain metabolic pathways, such as the ability to catabolize galactose or allantoin, reflecting evolutionary adaptations to its specialized host niches. Aspergillus fumigatus, an environmental saprobe and opportunistic pathogen, retains a broad capacity to exploit various fermentable and non-fermentable carbon compounds, which aids survival in both environmental reservoirs and human hosts [17].
Nitrogen metabolism in fungal pathogens is equally versatile. Fungi can assimilate preferred nitrogen sources like ammonium and glutamine but are also capable of utilizing urea, peptides, amino acids, polyamines, and other nitrogen-containing compounds. This is critical within host tissues where nitrogen sources are often limited by nutritional immunity. For instance, Cryptococcus neoformans modulates capsule synthesis, a key virulence factor, in response to nitrogen availability, demonstrating a direct link between nitrogen metabolism and pathogenicity [18,19,20]. Additionally, fungal pathogens employ protein recycling and autophagy pathways to overcome nitrogen starvation during infection. C. albicans upregulates vacuolar proteases and ubiquitin-dependent degradation pathways to recycle intracellular proteins under nutrient-limited conditions, supporting survival within macrophages and contributing to virulence [21]. Similarly, pathogens such as N. glabrata and C. neoformans rely on autophagy for full virulence, reflecting their preference for intracellular lifestyle adaptations [22]. The broad metabolic diversity and resource acquisition strategies of various species are further summarized (see Table 1 for detailed examples).
The role of degradative enzymes as virulence factors is a central concept in fungal pathogenesis, largely established through foundational studies in Candida albicans. In this archetypal pathogen, secreted aspartic proteinases (Saps) are key virulence factors, facilitating tissue invasion by degrading host cell membranes, surface glycoproteins, and extracellular matrix components. Therefore, the presence of similar proteinase activity in environmental or emerging fungi, such as those isolated in this study, is considered a strong indicator of potential virulence [36,37].
The C. albicans genome contains a multigene family encoding at least 10 SAP proteins, which are differentially expressed during distinct infection stages, enabling precise regulation of proteolytic activity to suit environmental and host cues [38]. Notably, genes such as SAP4, SAP5, and SAP6 are predominantly upregulated during tissue invasion and systemic infection, highlighting their role in pathogenic progression [39]. Besides C. albicans, other fungal pathogens also rely on extracellular enzymes for host tissue penetration. Dermatophytes secrete keratinases, specialized proteases that degrade keratin in skin and nails, facilitating superficial mycoses [40]. A. fumigatus produces elastases that are critical for pulmonary tissue invasion and dissemination, especially in immunocompromised patients [41]. Additionally, phospholipases secreted by Candida and Cryptococcus species contribute to host membrane disruption and immune evasion, underscoring their multifaceted role in fungal pathogenesis [40,41,42].
The functional importance of these enzymes in infection is further supported by gene disruption studies, wherein mutants deficient in key hydrolytic enzymes exhibit attenuated virulence, reduced tissue invasion, and impaired biofilm formation. These findings not only clarify enzyme roles in fungal pathogenicity but also highlight promising therapeutic targets for antifungal drug development [42]. The dual roles of these enzymes in decomposition, invasion, and immune evasion are exemplified across major pathogenic species (Table 2).
Fungal biofilms are structured communities embedded in extracellular matrix and adhere to biotic and abiotic surfaces, including medical devices like catheters and prosthetics [48,49]. Biofilms confer survival advantages including resistance to antifungal agents and host immune defenses [50]. Fungi such as Candida spp., Aspergillus fumigatus, and C. neoformans form structured biofilms involving extracellular matrix production and secretion of hydrolytic enzymes, aiding adhesion, invasion, and persistence [51,52]. During biofilm development, Candida species, filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus, and encapsulated yeasts like Cryptococcus produce a variety of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes, including proteases, phospholipases, and lipases, that facilitate key processes such as adhesion to surfaces, tissue invasion, and nutrient acquisition [53]. This coordinated expression is tightly linked with fungal morphogenetic transitions (e.g., yeast-to-hyphae switch in C. albicans) and stress response pathways, enhancing the fungi’s ability to survive and thrive in hostile host microenvironments [51]. Additionally, hydrolytic enzymes serve in biofilm maturation by modulating the extracellular matrix composition, facilitating dispersal of fungal cells. Enzymatic degradation of host tissues also allows invasion beyond the biofilm’s immediate niche, contributing to systemic dissemination [54].
C. neoformans secretes enzymes that modulate its polysaccharide capsule structure and mask pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), dampening recognition by host immune cells and promoting immune evasion, by reduced phagocytosis and impairment of inflammatory responses [55]. Alternatively, A. fumigatus produces an array of proteases, including elastases and metalloproteases, that degrade pulmonary tissue not only promoting tissue invasion but also fostering immunosuppression [43]. Recent studies also revealed cell wall-associated glucanases and other hydrolases from entomo- and phytopathogenic fungi that remodel surface PAMPs, which reduces immune activation by avoiding detection, interfering with immune signaling, and protecting against oxidative bursts by immune cells [56].
The role of hydrolytic enzymes and metabolic flexibility in fungal virulence is well-established, yet clinical progress is hindered by knowledge gaps in enzymatic regulation, particularly the “master switches” that control the transition between saprophytic metabolism and tissue aggression in opportunistic pathogens. There is a controversy regarding the actual quantitative contribution of specific enzymes in vivo, as functional redundancy and high enzymatic plasticity suggest that the loss of one pathway can be compensated by others, necessitating continuous reassessment of virulence profiles, such as in the case of the reclassification of Candidozyma auris. Future directions must employ omics and single-cell approaches to map the enzymatic and metabolic dynamics within host microenvironments, aiming to identify inhibitors that can selectively modulate enzyme families or disrupt metabolic switches crucial for host survival, paving the way for the development of next-generation antifungals.

3. Thermotolerance

Fungi exhibit remarkable resilience in extreme habitats inhospitable to most life forms [57]. Extremotolerant species, such as black fungi exemplified by Exophiala dermatitidis, thrive in deserts, high UV exposure zones, and oligotrophic niches, aided by protective melanin pigments, mycosporines, and carotenoids [58]. Melanin shields against UV radiation and oxidative stress, also potentially converting radiation into metabolic energy [59]. Some black fungi demonstrate enhanced growth under ionizing radiation, evidencing extraordinary adaptability [60]. Deep-sea fungi from high-pressure, low-temperature, and nutrient-poor sediments contribute to carbon cycling, with species like Aspergillus terreus adapting by producing cold-active enzymes [61,62]. These findings underscore fungi’s contributions to biogeochemical cycles even in extreme ecosystems.
Thermotolerance underpins fungal pathogenicity by facilitating adaptation to 37 °C and febrile conditions, enabling fungi such as C. albicans, A. fumigatus, and C. neoformans to colonize and invade hosts [63]. A deeper molecular perspective reveals that the transcription factor Hsf1 is the master regulator responsible for initiating the heat shock response, directly controlling the expression of numerous Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs) like Hsp90. Hsp90, in turn, acts as a molecular chaperone essential for maintaining the stability and function of key fungal kinases and signaling proteins required for morphogenesis (e.g., yeast-to-hyphae switch in C. albicans) and virulence at 37 °C. Furthermore, adaptation to high temperatures requires precise remodeling of the cell membrane by adjusting the ratio of saturated to unsaturated fatty acids to maintain membrane fluidity and integrity, a process governed by dedicated desaturase enzymes. This coordinated molecular response, far beyond simple protein folding, is what truly enables survival at mammalian temperatures [64,65].
A. fumigatus tolerates temperatures above 50 °C through adaptations including not only heat shock proteins (HSPs), but also thermostable enzymes and membrane lipid remodeling [63,66]. Thermotolerance is a pivotal virulence factor enabling survival at mammalian body temperatures, a prerequisite for many infections [61,67]. Thermotolerance is a pivotal virulence factor enabling survival at mammalian body temperatures, a prerequisite for many infections. The diverse temperature thresholds and underlying mechanisms of clinically relevant fungi are summarized (Table 3).
While thermotolerance is a well-established prerequisite for pathogenicity, significant knowledge gaps persist regarding the signaling hierarchy that links host temperature detection (37 °C/febrile conditions) to the precise regulation of key virulence factors and metabolic adaptation. A key controversy is whether thermotolerance is merely a prerequisite for survival or an actively modulated virulence mechanism, especially in emerging pathogens like Candiozyma auris which tolerates >40 °C. This debate informs the clinical relevance of targeting highly conserved stress responses like Hsp90. Future directions should focus on identifying fungus-specific vulnerabilities within the thermal stress response, such as non-conserved components of membrane lipid regulation or the unique metabolic pathways of extremotolerant fungi. Developing adjuvant therapies that target the major regulators of these systems, like Hsf1, may offer a promising strategy to disarm fungal virulence without incurring the systemic toxicity associated with targeting highly conserved proteins.

4. Melanin and Stress Resistance

The most studied melanization pathway, the L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) pathway, relies on the critical enzyme laccase (Lac1) in Cryptococcus neoformans. Laccase catalyzes the polymerization of DOPA-like precursors derived from catechols found in the environment (e.g., bird droppings) into the mature melanin polymer. Conversely, many filamentous fungi, such as Aspergillus fumigatus, utilize the 1,8-dihydroxynaphthalene (DHN) pathway, which involves several reductase and dehydratase enzymes (like the polyketide synthase PksP/Alb1) to produce the pigment. The genetic control of these pathways is a central virulence mechanism, as melanin masks Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs), directly interfering with phagocyte recognition and clearance [74,75].
Melanized fungi evade immune clearance by scavenging reactive oxygen species and modulating host responses [76]. Melanin also reduces antifungal efficacy by binding drugs such as amphotericin B [77]. Its dual role in environmental resilience and pathogenesis emphasizes melanin as a key adaptive molecule for fungi inhabiting diverse and hostile niches [78]. Its dual role in environmental resilience and pathogenesis emphasizes melanin as a key adaptive molecule for fungi inhabiting diverse and hostile niches. Examples of melanized fungi, their protective factors, and their adaptive roles are detailed in Table 4.
Although melanin is crucial for both environmental resilience and fungal virulence, significant knowledge gaps persist in understanding the precise mechanisms by which it scavenges reactive oxygen species and modulates host immune responses, particularly the quantitative relationship between melanin density and effective clearance by macrophages. A key controversy lies in the exact mechanism of melanin’s anti-antifungal action, including whether it reduces Amphotericin B efficacy primarily through direct drug binding or by altering cell wall properties that impede drug entry. Future directions should focus on elucidating the melanin biosynthetic pathway as a specific therapeutic target. Research should aim to develop novel compounds that selectively inhibit key melanogenesis enzymes, thereby disarming fungal protection without causing host toxicity.

5. Fungal Adaptive Plasticity: Genomic, Epigenetic, and Survival Strategies

Fungal asexual spores (conidia) and sexual spores are highly resistant structures that ensure survival under adverse conditions including extreme temperature, desiccation, UV radiation, and nutrient scarcity. Conidia, ascospores, and basidiospores enable dispersal, dormancy, and infection of hosts. In many medically relevant fungi that lack a known sexual cycle, such as Aspergillus species, conidia are the primary infectious propagules and highly resistant survival forms [83]. Molecular mechanisms governing spore formation and persistence are being elucidated, revealing crucial roles in fungal propagation and pathogenicity [84]. Spore melanization further enhances resistance to environmental and host-derived stresses, contributing to long-term survival and disease transmission [85].
Fungal pathogens exhibit extensive genomic and epigenetic plasticity enabling rapid adaptation to environmental and host pressures [86]. Mechanisms include ploidy variations, chromosome rearrangements, copy number variations, and epigenetic changes such as DNA methylation and histone modifications [87,88]. Such plasticity underlies antifungal resistance and virulence modulation, with epigenetic regulation increasingly recognized as a target for novel therapies [89,90].
A hallmark of opportunistic fungal pathogens is their ecological plasticity, allowing them to transition between saprophytic or commensal states and a parasitic lifestyle. Whether originating from the external environment or as a member of the host’s microbiota, this switch to a pathogenic state involves a complex modulation of metabolism, gene expression, and morphology in response to host cues [91]. Successful infection requires the deployment of virulence factors such as hydrolytic enzymes and biofilm formation, enabling tissue invasion and immune evasion [1]. Understanding this duality enhances insights into fungal pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets.
The rapid adaptability of fungi is frequently controlled by Epigenetic Mechanisms that modify gene expression without altering the underlying DNA sequence. Changes in DNA methylation or histone modifications (acetylation and methylation), mediated by enzymes like histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and deacetylases (HDACs), can quickly silence or activate entire virulence programs, contributing significantly to antifungal resistance and morphological transition [92]. Furthermore, certain cytosolic enzymes exhibit “moonlighting” multifunctions, where they assume non-canonical roles, typically on the cell surface, in response to host cues. For instance, housekeeping proteins involved in glycolysis, such as Enolase or Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase, are frequently found anchored to the fungal cell wall of Candida and Histoplasma capsulatum [93]. In this extracellular location, they function as adhesins, plasminogen receptors, or immunomodulators, promoting colonization and tissue invasion. This relocalization, often triggered by stress or host-derived signals, is a highly conserved adaptive strategy for rapid pathogenesis [12].
Recognizing plasticity as central to virulence, significant knowledge gaps persist regarding the specific host signals that acutely trigger genomic and epigenetic rearrangements during infection, and whether this plasticity is a stochastic or rigidly programmed event. A key controversy surrounds the causality between ploidy events and antifungal resistance: is genomic variation a primary defense mechanism or merely a consequence of drug selective pressure? Future directions must utilize single-cell sequencing technologies to map genomic and epigenetic changes in real-time during the commensal-to-pathogen transition, aiming to develop epigenetic drugs that can “lock” the fungus in its saprophytic state, thereby preventing the expression of virulence.
Comprehending this adaptive plasticity offers essential insights into fungal pathogenesis and identifies new points for therapeutic intervention. A comprehensive overview of medically important fungal species, categorized by their ecological lifestyle and associated pathogenic infections, is provided (Table 5).

6. Human-Associated Risk Factors and Changes in Fungal Disease Dynamics

The incidence of fungal infections is rising, driven by factors such as population aging, increased use of immunosuppressants, broad-spectrum antibiotics, invasive procedures, and comorbidities including HIV, diabetes, and cancer [118,119]. These conditions disrupt host defenses and create niches favorable to fungal colonization and infection.
Environmental changes, including urbanization, as well as increased international travel and global trade, facilitate the emergence and spread of novel and resistant fungi, complicating diagnosis and treatment [120]. Surveillance and public health measures integrating One Health approaches, acknowledging human, animal, and environmental linkages, are essential [121,122].
Environmental changes, including urbanization, as well as increased international travel and global trade, facilitate the emergence and spread of novel and resistant fungi, complicating diagnosis and treatment. Surveillance and public health measures integrating One Health approaches, acknowledging human, animal, and environmental linkages, are essential. Specific human-associated factors that increase susceptibility to fungal infections are detailed in Table 6.
The emergence of fungal infections is also strongly linked to occupational and environmental exposures, creating specific risk profiles often overlooked in clinical settings. For example, exposure to airborne conidia of Aspergillus is significantly higher among construction workers due to disturbed soil and insulation materials [130]. Similarly, individuals engaged in farming, caving, or landscaping face elevated risk of exposure to environmental pathogens like Histoplasma capsulatum (found in bird and bat droppings) [131] and Coccidioides immitis (found in arid soils) [132]. Recognizing these ecological and occupational links is vital for implementing targeted surveillance and prevention, aligning with the One Health paradigm.
Despite the clear recognition of host-associated risk factors, significant knowledge gaps persist in the precise quantification of each factor’s contribution (e.g., antibiotic use vs. comorbidity) to the individual risk of developing invasive mycosis. A key controversy lies in the practical application of the One Health approach: how to integrate environmental surveillance and sampling (soil, water, animals) into hospital clinical protocols in a cost-effective and scalable manner to prevent outbreaks of emerging and resistant fungi like Candiozyma auris? Future directions require the implementation of Machine Learning systems to analyze vast sets of clinical, microbiological, and environmental data. The goal is to develop robust predictive models that can identify high-risk patients before fungal infection and optimize public health interventions that effectively link environmental factors to human health outcomes.

7. The Landscape of Antifungal Therapy: From Current Guidelines to Future Innovations

Treating fungal infections remains a significant clinical challenge, compounded by a limited antifungal arsenal and increasing pathogen resistance [133]. The therapeutic landscape is defined by established clinical guidelines for current agents, promising investigational drugs, and revolutionary technologies poised to shape future treatments. Current management of invasive fungal infections relies on three main classes of antifungal drugs, each targeting different fungal cellular mechanisms.
Polyenes: Amphotericin B is polyene used clinically for invasive mycoses. The drug targets ergosterol, causing the disruption of the fungal cell membrane and compromising its integrity. It is highly effective against a broad range of pathogens, including Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., making it a cornerstone for severe systemic infections. Modern lipid formulations have significantly reduced its characteristic nephrotoxicity, allowing for higher doses and improved outcomes [134].
Azoles: The triazoles, including fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and others, function by inhibiting the enzyme lanosterol 14α-demethylase, which blocks ergosterol biosynthesis and disrupts membrane integrity [135]. Fluconazole, for example, is widely used for candidiasis due to its favorable safety profile, but it has limited efficacy against intrinsically resistant species like N. glabrata and Candida krusei [28,100].
Echinocandins: This class, which includes caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin, offers a high degree of selectivity by inhibiting β-(1,3)-d-glucan synthesis, a critical component for the synthesis of the fungal cell wall, a machinery that is absent in animal cells [136]. Due to their proven efficacy and safety, echinocandins are recommended as first-line therapy for invasive fungal infections such as candidemia [137]. When they are unavailable or contraindicated, alternatives like a triazole or liposomal amphotericin B are selected based on infection severity and species susceptibility [137,138]. According to current guidelines, the treatment duration for candidemia typically extends for 14 days after the first negative blood culture, necessitating serial monitoring to confirm the clearance of the pathogen [139].
In parallel with established protocols, innovative modalities are under intense investigation to address the rise of antifungal resistance. Recently available and forthcoming drugs are targeting novel fungal processes to overcome the limitations of conventional agents. Promising new antifungals, such as the once-weekly echinocandin rezafungin, the novel triterpenoid ibrexafungerp, and the first-in-class agent fosmanogepix, show broad efficacy against resistant yeasts and molds [133,140]. Beyond new molecules, adjunctive strategies are also being explored. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), which uses photosensitizers activated by light to generate reactive oxygen species, has shown promise in disrupting biofilms and enhancing the susceptibility of resistant Candida strains to traditional antifungals like amphotericin B [141].
The increasing burden of fungal disease has catalyzed a wave of innovation, leveraging cutting-edge technologies to advance diagnostics and drug development.
Artificial intelligence (AI): Modern antifungal research is driven by a synergy between large-scale data analysis and precise genetic engineering. Advances in genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic analyses generate massive datasets that elucidate pathogen virulence and resistance pathways [142]. AI then harnesses this information, using machine learning to rapidly identify novel compounds, predict resistance mutations, and optimize therapeutic regimens [143]. Complementing these computational strategies, gene-editing tools like CRISPR/Cas provide the means for functional validation, allowing researchers to precisely dissect fungal pathogenicity and confirm novel therapeutic targets in preclinical models [144,145]. Together, these technologies are creating a powerful pipeline for developing personalized antifungal therapies.
Nanotechnology and Biomaterials: Nanoparticles, hydrogels, and polymer-based materials are being developed for targeted drug delivery and the prevention of biofilm formation on medical devices [146]. Materials like silver nanoparticles can disrupt fungal membranes, representing a promising adjunctive therapy [147]. Similarly, novel platforms such as biodegradable, nitric oxide (NO)-releasing microparticles have emerged as a powerful strategy, proving effective against a wide range of pathogenic fungi and their biofilms [148].
Immunotherapy and Vaccines: Emerging immunotherapies, including monoclonal antibodies and fungal vaccines, are under development to enhance host immunity. These approaches aim to prevent infection or serve as adjuncts to traditional antifungals, offering a powerful new strategy in the fight against fungal pathogens [149].
Diagnostic Innovations: Advances in rapid molecular diagnostics, combined with machine learning analysis of clinical and imaging data, are set to improve the timely detection and personalized treatment of fungal infections [150,151].
Finally, the effective and sustainable use of this entire therapeutic arsenal, both current and future, depends on robust control strategies. Antifungal stewardship programs, often managed by clinical pharmacists and infectious diseases physicians, are essential to curb the development of resistance and optimize patient outcomes. These programs, combined with epidemiological surveillance and continuous education for healthcare providers, are critical components for managing fungal infections effectively in both hospital and community settings [152].
Despite the promise of new agent classes (like rezafungin and ibrexafungerp) and emerging technologies (AI, nanotechnology), a critical knowledge gap is the lack of understanding of fungal compensatory mechanisms activated when primary target pathways are blocked, which explains the rapid emergence of cross-resistance. A central controversy lies in the clinical efficacy of emerging adjunctive therapies (such as PDT and immunotherapy), which still lack robust, large-scale clinical trials to determine their role as the standard of care compared to conventional monotherapy. Future directions must focus on optimizing strategies that attack multiple pathways simultaneously—using AI to design drug combinations that overcome metabolic redundancy, nanotechnology to ensure the targeted and non-toxic delivery of these cocktails, and immunotherapies (vaccines) that provide long-term protection against common opportunistic pathogens like C. albicans and A. fumigatus.

8. Advances in Diagnosis of Fungal Infections

Accurate and timely diagnosis of fungal infections remains a critical challenge in clinical mycology. Conventional methods such as direct microscopy, histopathology, and culture remain gold standards but are limited by low sensitivity, slow turnaround times, and difficulty in species-level identification [153].
Recent advances include molecular diagnostic assays such as PCR-based tests and proteomic technologies like MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry that enable rapid and precise species identification within hours instead of days or weeks [154]. MALDI-TOF has revolutionized fungal diagnostics by accurately identifying over 50 fungal species from clinical specimens, dramatically reducing the diagnostic window and allowing earlier targeted antifungal therapy [155].
Non-invasive biomarkers such as 1,3-β-d-glucan and galactomannan assays provide useful adjuncts for invasive fungal infection detection, especially in high-risk patients. While these biomarkers exhibit high negative predictive values, their specificity and positive predictive values remain limited, necessitating integration with clinical and radiological findings [156]. Current guidelines recommend combining biomarker assays with molecular diagnostics for optimal management. Integration of advanced imaging modalities (e.g., CT, MRI) with AI-driven image analysis algorithms offers promising tools for early detection and differentiation of fungal infections, facilitating personalized care [157].
Despite these advances, limitations in accessibility, cost, and standardization constrain widespread implementation, particularly in low-resource settings. Research efforts are ongoing to develop point-of-care diagnostics, multiplex assays, and digital health solutions to address these gaps and improve global fungal infection management [158].
Despite the speed of MALDI-TOF and the utility of biomarkers, a critical knowledge gap in fungal diagnosis is the validity and sensitivity of molecular assays (PCR) directly in blood specimens for non-candidemic fungemias and deep invasive fungal infections, often limited by low fungal loads and PCR inhibitors. A key controversy lies in the interpretation and standardization of pan-fungal biomarkers, whose positive results can be influenced by non-infection-related clinical procedures or drugs. Future directions must focus on developing low-cost, high-sensitivity point-of-care (POC) tests that combine molecular detection with multiplex biomarker analysis, leveraging AI to integrate imaging and clinical findings. This is crucial for overcoming accessibility constraints and enabling timely detection and personalized therapies globally.

9. Future Prophylaxis: Immunotherapy and Vaccine Development

Preventing fungal infections is a crucial public health priority, considering the increasing incidence and limited therapeutic options [159]. Effective prevention strategies target both environmental and host-related factors. Maintaining personal hygiene, reducing exposure to contaminated surfaces, and avoiding sharing of personal items are fundamental. For example, avoiding walking barefoot in communal areas, keeping skin dry, and using breathable clothing help prevent dermatophytosis and candidiasis [160,161]. Proper cleaning and disinfection in healthcare settings are essential to limit nosocomial fungal transmission, particularly of opportunistic pathogens like Candida and Aspergillus spp. [160,161]. Minimizing fungal spore exposure in high-risk environments via air filtration, humidity control, and protective equipment reduces the risk of invasive infections, especially in immunocompromised patients [162].
Beyond direct-acting antifungal agents, a significant frontier is the modulation of the host’s own immune system. Although no licensed fungal vaccines currently exist, research into candidates targeting major pathogens is advancing, offering hope for future prophylaxis in vulnerable populations [163]. In parallel, immunotherapies designed to augment host defenses, such as monoclonal antibodies, checkpoint inhibitors, and engineered immune cells, are under active development to improve the host’s ability to resist and clear invasive fungal infections. Public health strategies for fungal diseases are increasingly aligned with major global health paradigms. For example, modeled on the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets for HIV, the World Health Organization (WHO) advocates for a ‘95-95’ approach to manage cryptococcal meningitis, a leading cause of death in people with advanced HIV disease. This initiative aims to ensure 95% of eligible patients are screened for the cryptococcal antigen and 95% of positive cases receive effective antifungal therapy [164].
Despite the importance of prevention, a major knowledge gap lies in the identification of optimal antigenic targets for the development of fungal vaccines. The poor understanding of protective immunity mechanisms against fungi (host–fungus immunology) hinders the rational design of universal candidates. A key controversy is the efficacy and safety of prophylactic and preemptive antifungal use in low-to-moderate-risk patients; generalization may increase selective pressure and resistance without clear benefit. Future directions must focus on advanced phase trials of therapeutic vaccines and specific immunological adjuvants, such as monoclonal antibodies targeting virulence molecules or surface antigens. Furthermore, the application of goal-based prevention programs (like the WHO’s ‘95-95’ initiative) needs to be expanded and adapted to other endemic and opportunistic mycoses to become a global paradigm.

10. Challenges and Future Perspectives in Fungal Infection Research and Treatment

Fungal infections pose a growing global health threat, a challenge formally recognized by the World Health Organization’s (WHO) inaugural Fungal Priority Pathogens List. This threat is further complicated by rising antifungal resistance, climate change, and evolving host and environmental factors [165,166]. Despite advances in diagnostics and therapeutics, significant barriers remain, including limited drug classes, diagnostic delays, and insufficient understanding of complex host–pathogen interactions [167].
Recent approvals of new antifungal agents targeting unique fungal pathways provide hope for overcoming multidrug resistance. Research into natural products, drug repurpose, immunotherapies, and nanotechnology-based formulations are ongoing to expand our therapeutic arsenal [145,168]. Emerging molecular diagnostics and biomarker assays offer faster, more accurate detection, enabling earlier interventions [169]. Meanwhile, combined antifungal therapies and stewardship programs improve treatment outcomes and mitigate resistance emergence [170]. Effective management of fungal diseases requires integrated “One Health” efforts across human health, veterinary medicine, and environmental science, recognizing the interconnectedness of ecosystems influencing fungal epidemiology [171].
Despite the global recognition of the fungal threat by the WHO Priority Pathogens List, a major knowledge gap lies in the mechanistic understanding of the triadic interaction (fungus-host-environment). It remains unclear how climate change and pollution predictably modulate fungal virulence and drug resistance. A central controversy is the economic and logistical feasibility of implementing the One Health concept on a large scale, as environmental surveillance and high-resolution genomic sequencing are not yet routine or accessible in low-resource clinical settings. Future directions must focus on creating global surveillance networks that integrate genomic, environmental, and clinical data, leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) to predict outbreaks and optimize antifungal stewardship strategies. The emphasis should shift towards developing a universal pan-fungal vaccine or utilizing precision therapies guided by host-response biomarkers to modulate patient immunity, rather than relying solely on new antifungal agents.

11. Conclusions

Fungal pathogens demonstrate extraordinary versatility through an array of biochemical, morphological, and genetic adaptations that enable survival across diverse environments and host niches. Hydrolytic enzymes play pivotal roles in nutrient acquisition, tissue invasion, and immune evasion, while metabolic flexibility and stress tolerance augment pathogenic potential. The emergence of antifungal resistance, driven by genetic mutations, epigenetic shifts, and biofilm-associated tolerance, complicates treatment and necessitates innovative therapeutic strategies. The time for incremental advancements in clinical mycology has passed. Fungal pathogens represent a quintessential One Health threat, leveraging complex genomic and epigenetic plasticity to bridge the gap “From the Ground to the Clinic.” The central challenge is recognizing that fungal virulence is not static but a dynamic, environment-driven phenomenon mediated by specific molecular switches—from the Lac1-driven melanization to Hsf1-regulated thermotolerance. Understanding these complex interactions between host, pathogen, and environment is essential to enhance diagnosis, prevention, and management of fungal diseases. To curtail the escalating global crisis of antifungal resistance, we must move beyond the current limited therapeutic arsenal. Future efforts must be bold: harnessing AI and single-cell omics to decode the host–pathogen-environment triad, designing precision epigenetic drugs to “lock” the fungus in its non-pathogenic state, and prioritizing the long-sought goal of an effective pan-fungal vaccine. Only by integrating molecular authority with a global surveillance strategy can we hope to contain this adaptable and ever-evolving threat.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.C.-J., S.F. and J.D.N.; literature search, D.C.-J.; writing—original draft preparation, D.C.-J.; writing—review and editing, D.C.-J., D.Z.-M., S.F. and J.D.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by R21AI156104, RO1AI171093 (JN and DZM), a Seed Fund from Albert Einstein College of Medicine (DCJ, JN and DZM), RO1AI183314 (JN), Brazilian agencies Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (D.C.J. and S.F.), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES), Finance Code 001 (D.C.J. and S.F.), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) (D.C.J. and S.F.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the above-mentioned funding agencies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AIArtificial Intelligence
AI-drivenArtificial Intelligence-driven
CNSCentral Nervous System
CRISPR/CasClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated system
CTComputed Tomography
DNADeoxyribonucleic Acid
HIV/AIDSHuman Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
HSPsHeat Shock Proteins
MALDI-TOFMatrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight
MRIMagnetic Resonance Imaging
NONitric Oxide
PAMPsPathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns
PCRPolymerase Chain Reaction
PDTPhotodynamic Therapy
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
SAPSsSecreted Aspartic Proteinases
UNAIDSJoint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS
UVUltraviolet
WHOWorld Health Organization

References

  1. Naranjo-Ortiz, M.A.; Gabaldón, T. Fungal Evolution: Major Ecological Adaptations and Evolutionary Transitions. Biol. Rev. 2019, 94, 1443–1476. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hawksworth, D.L.; Lücking, R. Fungal Diversity Revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 Million Species. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rokas, A. Evolution of the Human Pathogenic Lifestyle in Fungi. Nat. Microbiol. 2022, 7, 607–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Denham, S.T.; Wambaugh, M.A.; Brown, J.C.S. How Environmental Fungi Cause a Range of Clinical Outcomes in Susceptible 474 Hosts. J. Mol. Biol. 2019, 431, 2982–3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lionakis, M.S. Genetic Susceptibility to Fungal Infections in Humans. Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 2012, 6, 11–22. [Google Scholar]
  6. Fernandes, K.E.; Carter, D.A. Cellular Plasticity of Pathogenic Fungi during Infection. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sánchez, C. Lignocellulosic Residues: Biodegradation and Bioconversion by Fungi. IOSR J. 2009, 27, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pereira, J.L.; Noronha, E.F.; Miller, R.N.G.; Franco, O.L. Novel Insights in the Use of Hydrolytic Enzymes Secreted by Fungi with Biotechnological Potential. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 44, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Read, D.J.; Perez-Moreno, J. Mycorrhizas and Nutrient Cycling in Ecosystems—A Journey towards Relevance? New Phytol. 2003, 157, 475–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gloer, J.B. The Chemistry of Fungal Antagonism and Defense. Can. J. Bot. 1995, 73, 1265–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Van Den Brink, J.; De Vries, R.P. Fungal Enzyme Sets for Plant Polysaccharide Degradation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 91, 1477–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. de Groot, P.W.J.; Bader, O.; de Boer, A.D.; Weig, M.; Chauhan, N. Adhesins in Human Fungal Pathogens: Glue with Plenty of Stick. Eukaryot. Cells 2013, 12, 470–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Amore, A.; Giacobbe, S.; Faraco, V. Regulation of Cellulase and Hemicellulase Gene Expression in Fungi. Curr. Genom. 2013, 14, 230–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brown, N.A.; Ries, L.N.A.; Goldman, G.H. How Nutritional Status Signalling Coordinates Metabolism and Lignocellulolytic Enzyme Secretion. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2014, 72, 48–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Peñalva, M.A.; Arst, H.N. Regulation of Gene Expression by Ambient PH in Filamentous Fungi and Yeasts. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66, 426–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prusky, D.; Yakoby, N. Pathogenic Fungi: Leading or Led by Ambient PH? Mol. Plant Pathol. 2003, 4, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Liu, Z.; Li, M.; Xie, Q.; Liu, Y.; Huang, J.; Zeng, Q.; Li, X.; Rao, K.; Ning, J.; Zhao, M.; et al. Eradicating Fungal Biofilm-Based Infections by Ultrasound-Assisted Semiconductor Sensitized Upconversion Photodynamic Therapy. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 6499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Frazzitta, A.E.; Vora, H.; Price, M.S.; Tenor, J.L.; Betancourt-Quiroz, M.; Toffaletti, D.L.; Cheng, N.; Perfect, J.R. Nitrogen Source-Dependent Capsule Induction in Human-Pathogenic Cryptococcus Species. Eukaryot. Cells 2013, 12, 1439–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kim, J.N.; Henriksen, E.D.C.; Cann, I.K.O.; Mackie, R.I. Nitrogen Utilization and Metabolism in Ruminococcus Albus 8. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 3095–3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tudzynski, B. Nitrogen Regulation of Fungal Secondary Metabolism in Fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fan, F.M.; Liu, Y.Q.; Liu, Y.Q.; Lv, R.X.; Sun, W.; Ding, W.J.; Cai, Y.X.; Li, W.W.; Liu, X.; Qu, W. Candida Albicans Biofilms: Antifungal Resistance, Immune Evasion, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2022, 60, 106673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Romero, O.; Gutierrez-Gongora, D.; Geddes-McAlister, J. Cryptococcus Neoformans Biofilm Formation and Quantification. Curr. Protoc. 2025, 5, e70133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Sugui, J.A. Aspergillus Fumigatus-What Makes the Species a Ubiquitous Human Fungal Pathogen? PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mayer, F.L.; Wilson, D.; Hube, B. Candida Albicans Pathogenicity Mechanisms. Virulence 2013, 4, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Radhakrishnan, R.; Kang, S.M.; Baek, I.Y.; Lee, I.J. Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Traits of Penicillium Species Against the Effects of High Soil Salinity and Root Disease. J. Plant Interact. 2014, 9, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mayer, F.L.; Kronstad, J.W. Cryptococcus Neoformans; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 28, pp. 163–164. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuruvilla, T.; Dias, M. Fusarium Solani: A Causative Agent of Skin and Nail Infections. Indian J. Dermatol. 2012, 57, 308–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jamiu, A.T.; Albertyn, J.; Sebolai, O.M.; Pohl, C.H. Update on Candida Krusei, a Potential Multidrug-Resistant Pathogen. Med. Mycol. 2021, 59, 14–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, C.; Zhuang, W.Y. Carbon Metabolic Profiling of Trichoderma Strains Provides Insight into Potential Ecological Niches. Mycologia 2020, 112, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fazili, A.B.A.; Shah, A.M.; Zan, X.; Naz, T.; Nosheen, S.; Nazir, Y.; Ullah, S.; Zhang, H.; Song, Y. Mucor Circinelloides: A Model Organism for Oleaginous Fungi and Its Potential Applications in Bioactive Lipid Production. Microb. Cell Factories 2022, 21, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Daly, P.; Peng, M.; Mitchell, H.D.; Kim, Y.M.; Ansong, C.; Brewer, H.; de Gijsel, P.; Lipton, M.S.; Markillie, L.M.; Nicora, C.D.; et al. Colonies of the Fungus Aspergillus Niger Are Highly Differentiated to Adapt to Local Carbon Source Variation. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 1154–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gugnani, H.C. A Review of Zygomycosis Due to Basidiobolus Ranarum. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 1999, 15, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kirchhoff, L.; Olsowski, M.; Rath, P.M.; Steinmann, J. Exophiala Dermatitidis: Key Issues of an Opportunistic Fungal Pathogen. Virulence 2019, 10, 984–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tamez-Castrellón, A.; Romeo, O.; García-Carnero, L.; Lozoya-Pérez, N.; Mora-Montes, H. Virulence Factors in Sporothrix Schenckii, One of the Causative Agents of Sporotrichosis. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2020, 21, 295–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bauer, H.; Flanagan, J.F.; Sheldon, W.H. The Effects of Metabolic Alterations on Experimental Rhizopus Oryzae (Mucormycosis) Infection. Yale J. Biol. Med. 1956, 29, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
  36. Naglik, J.; Albrecht, A.; Bader, O.; Hube, B. Candida Albicans Proteinases and Host/Pathogen Interactions. Cell. Microbiol. 2004, 6, 915–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schaller, M.; Borelli, C.; Korting, H.C.; Hube, B. Hydrolytic Enzymes as Virulence Factors of Candida Albicans. Mycoses 2005, 48, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stehr, F.; Felk, A.; Kretschmar, M.; Schaller, M.; Schäfer, W.; Hube, B. Extrazelluläre Hydrolytische Enzyme Und Ihre Relevanz Bei Candida-Albicans-Infektionen. Mycoses 2000, 43, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  39. LaFleur, M.D. Candida Albicans Biofilms, Heterogeneity and Antifungal Drug Tolerance. Open Mycol. J. 2011, 5, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mercer, D.K.; Stewart, C.S. Keratin Hydrolysis by Dermatophytes. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kothary, M.H.; Chase, T.; MacMillan, J.D. Correlation of Elastase Production by Some Strains of Aspergillus Fumigatus with Ability to Cause Pulmonary Invasive Aspergillosis in Mice. Infect. Immun. 1984, 43, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ghannoum, M.A. Potential Role of Phospholipases in Virulence and Fungal Pathogenesis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 13, 122–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hernández-Chávez, M.J.; Pérez-García, L.A.; Niño-Vega, G.A.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Fungal Strategies to Evade the Host Immune Recognition. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kaufman, G.; Horwitz, B.; Duek, L.; Ullman, Y.; Berdicevsky, I. Infection Stages of the Dermatophyte Pathogen Trichophyton: Microscopic Characterization and Proteolytic Enzymes. Med. Mycol. 2007, 45, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sáenz, V.; Alvarez-Moreno, C.; Pape, P.L.; Restrepo, S.; Guarro, J.; Ramírez, A.M.C. A One Health Perspective to Recognize Fusarium as Important in Clinical Practice. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Valdez, A.F.; Miranda, D.Z.; Guimarães, A.J.; Nimrichter, L.; Nosanchuk, J.D. Pathogenicity & Virulence of Histoplasma Capsulatum—A Multifaceted Organism Adapted to Intracellular Environments. Virulence 2022, 13, 1900–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Resnick, S.; Pappagianis, D.; McKerrow, J.H. Proteinase Production by the Parasitic Cycle of the Pathogenic Fungus Coccidioides Immitis. Infect. Immun. 1987, 55, 2807–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ramage, G.; Mowat, E.; Jones, B.; Williams, C.; Lopez-Ribot, J. Our Current Understanding of Fungal Biofilms. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 35, 340–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kernien, J.F.; Snarr, B.D.; Sheppard, D.C.; Nett, J.E. The Interface between Fungal Biofilms and Innate Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2018, 8, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. de Cássia Orlandi Sardi, J.; Silva, D.R.; Soares Mendes-Giannini, M.J.; Rosalen, P.L. Candida Auris: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Virulence, Resistance, and Therapeutic Options. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 125, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Staniszewska, M. Virulence Factors in Candida Species. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2019, 21, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fanning, S.; Mitchell, A.P. Fungal Biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sharma, S.; Mohler, J.; Mahajan, S.D.; Schwartz, S.A.; Bruggemann, L.; Aalinkeel, R. Microbial Biofilm: A Review on Formation, Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, Control Measures, and Innovative Treatment. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Breslawec, A.P.; Liang, T.; Deng, Z.; Kuperman, L.L.; Yu, Q. Strategy to Combat Biofilms: A Focus on Biofilm Dispersal Enzymes. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2023, 9, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Leopold Wager, C.M.; Hole, C.R.; Wozniak, K.L.; Wormley, F.L. Cryptococcus and Phagocytes: Complex Interactions That Influence Disease Outcome. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 180340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, H.; Lu, Z.; Keyhani, N.O.; Deng, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, S.; Luo, Z.; Jin, K.; Zhang, Y. Insect Fungal Pathogens Secrete a Cell Wall-Associated Glucanase That Acts to Help Avoid Recognition by the Host Immune System. PLoS Pathog. 2023, 19, e1011578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Selbmann, L.; Egidi, E.; Isola, D.; Onofri, S.; Zucconi, L.; de Hoog, G.S.; Chinaglia, S.; Testa, L.; Tosi, S.; Balestrazzi, A.; et al. Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation of Fungi in Extreme Environments. Plant Biosyst. 2013, 147, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gostinčar, C.; Grube, M.; De Hoog, S.; Zalar, P.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Extremotolerance in Fungi: Evolution on the Edge. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 71, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Casadevall, A.; Cordero, R.J.B.; Bryan, R.; Nosanchuk, J.; Dadachova, E. Melanin, Radiation, and Energy Transduction in Fungi. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Robertson, K.L.; Mostaghim, A.; Cuomo, C.A.; Soto, C.M.; Lebedev, N.; Bailey, R.F.; Wang, Z. Adaptation of the Black Yeast Wangiella Dermatitidis to Ionizing Radiation: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Raghukumar, C.; Damare, S. Deep-Sea Fungi. In High-Pressure Microbiology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 265–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kiel Reese, B.; Sobol, M.S.; Bowles, M.W.; Hinrichs, K.U. Redefining the Subsurface Biosphere: Characterization of Fungi Isolated from Energy-Limited Marine Deep Subsurface Sediment. Front. Fungal Biol. 2021, 2, 727543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bhabhra, R.; Askew, D.S. Thermotolerance and Virulence of Aspergillus Fumigatus: Role of the Fungal Nucleolus. Med. Mycol. 2005, 43, S87–S93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Leach, M.D.; Cowen, L.E. Surviving the Heat of the Moment: A Fungal Pathogens Perspective. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, X.; St. Leger, R.J.; Fang, W. Pyruvate Accumulation Is the First Line of Cell Defense against Heat Stress in a Fungus. mBio 2017, 8, e01284-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Adav, S.S.; Ravindran, A.; Sze, S.K. Proteomic Analysis of Temperature Dependent Extracellular Proteins from Aspergillus Fumigatus Grown Under Solid-State Culture Condition. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 2715–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Leach, M.D.; Klipp, E.; Cowen, L.E.; Brown, A.J.P. Fungal Hsp90: A Biological Transistor That Tunes Cellular Outputs to Thermal Inputs. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rhodes, J.C. Aspergillus Fumigatus: Growth and Virulence. Med. Mycol. 2006, 44, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Brandt, M.E.; Gomez, B.L.; Warnock, D.W. Histoplasma, Blastomyces, Coccidioides, and Other Dimorphic Fungi Causing Systemic Mycoses. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 10th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022; Volume 2, pp. 1902–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kim, J.S.; Cha, H.; Bahn, Y.S. Comprehensive Overview of Candida Auris: An Emerging Multidrug-Resistant Fungal Pathogen. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 34, 1365–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Perfect, J.R. Cryptococcus Neoformans: The Yeast That Likes It Hot. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006, 6, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Arantes, T.D.; Bagagli, E.; Niño-Vega, G.; San-Blas, G.; Theodoro, R.C. Paracoccidioides Brasiliensis e Paracoccidioides Lutzii, Um Caso Secreto de Amor. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 2015, 57, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pruksaphon, K.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Ratanabanangkoon, K.; Youngchim, S. Talaromyces Marneffei Infection: Virulence, Intracellular Lifestyle and Host Defense Mechanisms. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Eisenman, H.C.; Casadevall, A. Synthesis and Assembly of Fungal Melanin; NIH Public Access: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2012; Volume 93, pp. 931–940. [Google Scholar]
  75. Smith, D.F.Q.; Casadevall, A. The Role of Melanin in Fungal Pathogenesis for Animal Hosts; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; Volume 422, pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  76. Heinekamp, T.; Thywißen, A.; Macheleidt, J.; Keller, S.; Valiante, V.; Brakhage, A.A. Aspergillus Fumigatus Melanins: Interference with the Host Endocytosis Pathway and Impact on Virulence. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gómez, B.L.; Nosanchuk, J.D. Melanin and Fungi. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 16, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Liu, S.; Youngchim, S.; Zamith-Miranda, D.; Nosanchuk, J.D. Fungal Melanin and the Mammalian Immune System. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wang, Y.; Aisen, P.; Casadevall, A. Melanin, Melanin “Ghosts,” and Melanin Composition in Cryptococcus Neoformans. Infect. Immun. 1996, 64, 2420–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Abbo, A.S.H. The Dark Side of Fungal Melanin; Alternaria Alternata as Example. In Proceedings of the Conference on International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development Organized, Göttingen, Germany, 19–21 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
  81. van de Sande, W.W.J.; de Kat, J.; Coppens, J.; Ahmed, A.O.A.; Fahal, A.; Verbrugh, H.; van Belkum, A. Melanin Biosynthesis in Madurella Mycetomatis and Its Effect on Susceptibility to Itraconazole and Ketoconazole. Microbes Infect. 2007, 9, 1114–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Coelho, R.A.; Figueiredo-Carvalho, M.H.G.; Silva, J.V.D.S.; Correa-Junior, D.; Frases, S.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M.; Freitas, D.F.S.; Almeida-Paes, R. Does DHN-Melanin Always Protect Fungi against Antifungal Drugs? The Fonsecaea/Micafungin Paradigm. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 13, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Dijksterhuis, J. Fungal Spores: Highly Variable and Stress-Resistant Vehicles for Distribution and Spoilage. Food Microbiol. 2019, 81, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Huang, M.; Hull, C.M. Sporulation: How to Survive on Planet Earth (and Beyond). Curr. Genet. 2017, 63, 831–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Gorbushina, A. Microcolonial Fungi: Survival Potential of Terrestrial Vegetative Structures. Astrobiology 2003, 3, 543–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Beekman, C.N.; Ene, I.V. Short-Term Evolution Strategies for Host Adaptation and Drug Escape in Human Fungal Pathogens. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Vande Zande, P.; Zhou, X.; Selmecki, A. The Dynamic Fungal Genome: Polyploidy, Aneuploidy and Copy Number Variation in Response to Stress. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 77, 341–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, Y.; Yu, W.; Lu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Ouyang, Z.; Tu, Y.; He, B. Epigenetic Regulation of Fungal Secondary Metabolism. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Tarek, A.A.; Hassan, M.N.; Tartor, Y. The Role of Epigenetic Mechanisms in Modulating Antifungal Resistance in Fungi. Zagazig Vet. J. 2024, 52, 411–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lai, Y.; Wang, L.; Zheng, W.; Wang, S. Regulatory Roles of Histone Modifications in Filamentous Fungal Pathogens. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Ene, I.V.; Brunke, S.; Brown, A.J.P.; Hube, B. Metabolism in Fungal Pathogenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 4, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Patra, S.; Raney, M.; Pareek, A.; Kaur, R. Epigenetic Regulation of Antifungal Drug Resistance. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Arvizu-Rubio, V.J.; García-Carnero, L.C.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Moonlighting Proteins in Medically Relevant Fungi. PeerJ 2022, 10, e14001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Venugopal, P.V.; Venugopal, T.V. Pale Grain Eumycetomas in Madras. Australas. J. Dermatol 1995, 36, 149–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. De Mers, M. Alternaria Alternata as Endophyte and Pathogen. Microbiology 2022, 168, 001153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Amaike, S.; Keller, N.P. Aspergillus Flavus. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2011, 49, 107–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Fleming, R.V.; Walsh, T.J.; Anaissie, E.J. Emerging and Less Common Fungal Pathogens. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2002, 16, 915–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Karkowska-Kuleta, J.; Rapala-Kozik, M.; Kozik, A. Fungi Pathogenic to Humans: Molecular Bases of Virulence of Candida Albicans, Cryptococcus Neoformans and Aspergillus Fumigatus. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2009, 56, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Spivak, E.S.; Hanson, K.E. Candida Auris: An Emerging Fungal Pathogen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e01588-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Silva, S.; Negri, M.; Henriques, M.; Oliveira, R.; Williams, D.W.; Azeredo, J. Candida Glabrata, Candida Parapsilosis and Candida Tropicalis: Biology, Epidemiology, Pathogenicity and Antifungal Resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 288–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. AlMatar, M.; Makky, E.A. Cladosporium Cladosporioides from the Perspectives of Medical and Biotechnological Approaches. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hagen, F.; Khayhan, K.; Theelen, B.; Kolecka, A.; Polacheck, I.; Sionov, E.; Falk, R.; Parnmen, S.; Lumbsch, H.T.; Boekhout, T. Recognition of Seven Species in the Cryptococcus Gattii/Cryptococcus Neoformans Species Complex. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015, 78, 16–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Nucci, M.; Anaissie, E. Fusarium Infections in Immunocompromised Patients. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Omotayo, O.P.; Babalola, O.O. Corrigendum: Fusarium Verticillioides of Maize Plant: Potentials of Propitious Phytomicrobiome as Biocontrol Agents. Front. Fungal Biol. 2023, 4, 1298350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Konsoula, A.; Tsioutis, C.; Markaki, I.; Papadakis, M.; Agouridis, A.P.; Spernovasilis, N. Lomentospora Prolificans: An Emerging Opportunistic Fungal Pathogen. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lunder, M. Is Microsporum Canis Infection About to Become A Serious Dermatological Problem? Dermatology 1992, 184, 87–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Junior, D.C.; Ramos, M.L.M.; Almeida-Paes, R.; Frases, S. New Insights in Dermatophytes: Microsporum Spp. and Nannizzia Spp. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2022, 9, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Duong, T.A. Infection Due to Penicillium Marneffei, an Emerging Pathogen: Review of 155 Reported Cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1996, 23, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sokulska, M.; Kicia, M.; Wesołowska, M.; Hendrich, A.B. Pneumocystis Jirovecii—From a Commensal to Pathogen: Clinical and Diagnostic Review. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 3577–3585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Steinbrink, J.M.; Miceli, M.H. Mucormycosis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 35, 435–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mello, T.P.; Aor, A.C.; Gonçalves, D.S.; Seabra, S.H.; Branquinha, M.H.; Santos, A.L.S. Assessment of Biofilm Formation by Scedosporium Apiospermum, S.; Aurantiacum, S. Minutisporum and Lomentospora Prolificans. Biofouling 2016, 32, 737–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Valdez, A.F.; Corrêa-Junior, D.; Bonilla, J.J.A.; Zamith-Miranda, D.; Frases, S.; Freitas, D.F.S.; Almeida-Paes, R.; Nimrichter, L.; Nosanchuk, J.D. A Review on Sporotrichosis and the Emergence of Sporothrix Brasiliensis as a Pathogen. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2023, 10, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Costa-Orlandi, C.B.; Sardi, J.C.O.; Santos, C.T.; Fusco-Almeida, A.M.; Mendes, M. In Vitro Characterization of Trichophyton Rubrum and T. Mentagrophytes Biofilms. Biofouling 2014, 30, 719–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. de Andrade, I.B.; Figueiredo-Carvalho, M.H.G.; Chaves, A.L.d.S.; Coelho, R.A.; Almeida-Silva, F.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M.; Frases, S.; Brito-Santos, F.; Almeida-Paes, R. Metabolic and Phenotypic Plasticity May Contribute for the Higher Virulence of Trichosporon Asahii over Other Trichosporonaceae Members. Mycoses 2023, 66, 430–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Milan, E.P.; Silva-Rocha, W.P.; De Almeida, J.J.S.; Fernandes, T.U.G.; De Araújo Prudente, A.L.; De Azevedo, M.F.; Francisco, E.C.; De Azevedo Melo, A.S.; Colombo, A.L.; Chaves, G.M. Trichosporon Inkin Meningitis in Northeast Brazil: First Case Report and Review of the Literature. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Lacasse, A.; Cleveland, K.O. Trichosporon Mucoides Fungemia in a Liver Transplant Recipient: Case Report and Review: Case Report. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2009, 11, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lanver, D.; Tollot, M.; Schweizer, G.; Lo Presti, L.; Reissmann, S.; Ma, L.S.; Schuster, M.; Tanaka, S.; Liang, L.; Ludwig, N.; et al. Ustilago Maydis Effectors and Their Impact on Virulence. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Boral, H.; Metin, B.; Döğen, A.; Seyedmousavi, S.; Ilkit, M. Overview of Selected Virulence Attributes in Aspergillus Fumigatus, Candida Albicans, Cryptococcus Neoformans, Trichophyton Rubrum, and Exophiala Dermatitidis. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2018, 111, 92–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Jenks, J.D.; Cornely, O.A.; Chen, S.C.A.; Thompson, G.R.; Hoenigl, M. Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infections: Who Is at Risk? Mycoses 2020, 63, 1021–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Perlin, D.S.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A. The Global Problem of Antifungal Resistance: Prevalence, Mechanisms, and Management. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, e383–e392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Konopka, J.B.; Casadevall, A.; Taylor, J.W.; Heitman, J.; Cowen, L. One Health: Fungal Pathogens of Humans, Animals, and Plants; American Society for Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Naz1, G.; Rasheed, M.; Sarwar, A.; Mehmood, S.; Farooq, W.; Imran, U.; Uroos, A.; Javed, J. A One-Health Approach to Combat Common Pet-Associated Fungal Zoonosis. Int. J. Agric. Biosci. 2023, 4, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Giles, C.; Lamont-Friedrich, S.J.; Michl, T.D.; Griesser, H.J.; Coad, B.R. The Importance of Fungal Pathogens and Antifungal Coatings in Medical Device Infections. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 264–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Arastehfar, A.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Garcia-Rubio, R.; Daneshnia, F.; Ilkit, M.; Boekhout, T.; Gabaldon, T.; Perlin, D.S. The Quiet and Underappreciated Rise of Drug-Resistant Invasive Fungal Pathogens. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Casadevall, A. Fungal Diseases in the 21st Century: The near and Far Horizons. Pathog. Immun. 2018, 3, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kauffman, C.A. Fungal Infections in Older Adults. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 33, 550–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Malavia, D.; Crawford, A.; Wilson, D. Nutritional Immunity and Fungal Pathogenesis: The Struggle for Micronutrients at the Host–Pathogen Interface. In Advances in Microbial Physiology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; Volume 70, pp. 85–103. [Google Scholar]
  128. Fridkin, S.K. The Changing Face of Fungal Infections in Health Care Settings. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 41, 1455–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Yii, A.C.A.; Koh, M.S.; Lapperre, T.S.; Tan, G.L.; Chotirmall, S.H. The Emergence of Aspergillus Species in Chronic Respiratory Disease. Front. Biosci.—Sch 2017, 9, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sabino, R.; Veríssimo, C.; Viegas, C.; Viegas, S.; Brandão, J.; Alves-Correia, M.; Borrego, L.M.; Clemons, K.V.; Stevens, D.A.; Richardson, M. The Role of Occupational Aspergillus Exposure in the Development of Diseases. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, S196–S205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. de Perio, M.A.; Benedict, K.; Williams, S.L.; Niemeier-Walsh, C.; Green, B.J.; Coffey, C.; Di Giuseppe, M.; Toda, M.; Park, J.H.; Bailey, R.L.; et al. Occupational Histoplasmosis: Epidemiology and Prevention Measures. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Coccidioidomycosis in Workers at an Archeologic Site—Dinosaur National Monument, Utah, June-July 2001. Arch. Dermatol. 2002, 138, 424–425. [CrossRef]
  133. Vanreppelen, G.; Wuyts, J.; Van Dijck, P.; Vandecruys, P. Sources of Antifungal Drugs. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Hoenigl, M.; Lewis, R.; van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Verweij, P.E.; Cornely, O.A. Liposomal Amphotericin B-the Future. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2022, 77, II21–II34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Price, C.L.; Parker, J.E.; Warrilow, A.G.; Kelly, D.E.; Kelly, S.L. Azole Fungicides—Understanding Resistance Mechanisms in Agricultural Fungal Pathogens. Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 71, 1054–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Sedik, S.; Wolfgruber, S.; Hoenigl, M.; Kriegl, L. Diagnosing Fungal Infections in Clinical Practice: A Narrative Review. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2024, 22, 935–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Mroczyńska, M.; Brillowska-Dąbrowska, A. Review on Current Status of Echinocandins Use. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Healey, K.R.; Perlin, D.S. Fungal Resistance to Echinocandins and the MDR Phenomenon in Candida Glabrata. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lone, S.A.; Ahmad, A. Candida Auris—the Growing Menace to Global Health. Mycoses 2019, 62, 620–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Shaw, K.J.; Ibrahim, A.S. Fosmanogepix: A Review of the First-in-Class Broad Spectrum Agent for the Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Nunes, I.P.F.; Crugeira, P.J.L.; Sampaio, F.J.P.; de Oliveira, S.C.P.S.; Azevedo, J.M.; Santos, C.L.O.; Soares, L.G.P.; Samuel, I.D.W.; Persheyev, S.; de Ameida, P.F.; et al. Evaluation of Dual Application of Photodynamic Therapy-PDT in Candida Albicans. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2023, 42, 103327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Cohen, A.; Bont, L.; Engelhard, D.; Moore, E.; Fernández, D.; Kreisberg-Greenblatt, R.; Oved, K.; Eden, E.; Hays, J.P. A Multifaceted ‘Omics’ Approach for Addressing the Challenge of Antimicrobial Resistance. Future Microbiol. 2015, 10, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. El-Maradny, Y.A.; Hajji-Hedfi, L.; Ismail, R.E.; Daraghmeh, H.M.; Aldib, L.; Mohamed, K.I.; Enairat, A.L.E.; Abdel-Azeem, A.M. Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Combatting Fungal Diseases: Diagnosis, Antifungal Resistance, and Therapeutic Strategies. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Machine Intelligence and Smart Innovation, ICMISI 2025—Proceedings, Cairo, Egypt, 10–12 May 2025; pp. 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Li, Y.; Qiao, Y.; Ma, Y.; Xue, P.; Ding, C. AI in Fungal Drug Development: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Outlook. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2025, 15, 1610743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Niño-Vega, G.A.; Padró-Villegas, L.; López-Romero, E. New Ground in Antifungal Discovery and Therapy for Invasive Fungal Infections: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Naik, K.; Srivastava, P.; Deshmukh, K.; Monsoor, M.S.; Kowshik, M. Nanomaterial-Based Approaches for Prevention of Biofilm-Associated Infections on Medical Devices and Implants. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 10108–10119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Velazco-Medel, M.A.; Camacho-Cruz, L.A.; Lugo-González, J.C.; Bucio, E. Antifungal Polymers for Medical Applications. Med. Devices Sens. 2021, 4, e10134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Valdez, A.F.; Bohner, F.; Goldman, J.P.; Jaquiery, A.B.; Amaral, E.V.C.d.; Correa-Junior, D.; Draganski, A.; Nimrichter, L.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Zamith-Miranda, D. Candida Auris Antifungal Resistance, Virulence and Susceptibility to a Novel Nitric Oxide-Releasing Microparticle and Its Correlations to Clade Identification. Microbiol. Res. 2025, 16, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Williams, T.J.; Harvey, S.; Armstrong-James, D. Immunotherapeutic Approaches for Fungal Infections. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Weiss, Z.F.; Leon, A.; Koo, S. The Evolving Landscape of Fungal Diagnostics, Current and Emerging Microbiological Approaches. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Fang, W.; Wu, J.; Cheng, M.; Zhu, X.; Du, M.; Chen, C.; Liao, W.; Zhi, K.; Pan, W. Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections: Challenges and Recent Developments. J. Biomed. Sci. 2023, 30, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Akbar, Z.; Aamir, M.; Saleem, Z. Optimizing Antifungal Therapy: A Systematic Review of Pharmacist Interventions, Stewardship Approaches, and Outcomes. Front. Med. 2024, 11, 1489109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Kumar, P.B.N. Recent Diagnostic Techniques in Mycology. J. Med. Microbiol. Diagn 2014, 3, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Florio, W.; Tavanti, A.; Barnini, S.; Ghelardi, E.; Lupetti, A. Recent Advances and Ongoing Challenges in the Diagnosis of Microbial Infections by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 338393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Hendrickx, M. MALDI-TOF MS and Filamentous Fungal Identification: A Success Story? Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 2017, 11, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Lass-Florl, C.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Gupta, R.; Chakroborti, A. Interpretation, Pitfalls of Biomarkers in Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Diseases. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2022, 40, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Kim, J.; Boo, J.; Park, C.O. Artificial Intelligence Applications in Medical Mycology: Current and Future. J. Mycol. Infect. 2024, 29, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Rajbongshi, J.; Mangayarkarasi, V.; Durairaj, E. Antifungal Stewardship—Principles, Current Practices, Limitations, and Potential Solutions: A Narrative Review. J. Antimicrob. Steward. Pract. Infect. Dis. 2025, 3, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Smith, D.J.; Gold, J.A.W.; Benedict, K.; Wu, K.; Lyman, M.; Jordan, A.; Medina, N.; Lockhart, S.R.; Sexton, D.J.; Chow, N.A.; et al. Public Health Research Priorities for Fungal Diseases: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Save Lives. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Sabino, R. Exposure to Fungi in Health Care Facilities. Encycl. Mycol. 2021, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Peng, B.; Gupta, A.K.; Taylor, D.; Wang, T.; Cooper, E.A.; Saunte, D.M.L.; Gupta, A.K.; Taylor, D.; Wang, T.; Cooper, E.A.; et al. Hygiene Practices Against Dermatophytic Fungi: A Review of Strategies to Combat Antifungal Resistance. Biology 2025, 14, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Araujo, R.; Cabral, J.P.; Araujo, R.; Cabral, J.P. Fungal Air Quality in Medical Protected Environments. In Air Quality; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Agbadamashi, D.J.; Price, C.L. Novel Strategies for Preventing Fungal Infections—Outline. Pathogens 2025, 14, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Denning, D.W. The Ambitious ‘95–95 by 2025’ Roadmap for the Diagnosis and Management of Fungal Diseases. Thorax 2015, 70, 613–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. George, M.E.; Gaitor, T.T.; Cluck, D.B.; Henao-Martínez, A.F.; Sells, N.R.; Chastain, D.B. The Impact of Climate Change on the Epidemiology of Fungal Infections: Implications for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Public Health Strategies. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2025, 12, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. World Health Organization. WHO Fungal Priority Pathogens List to Guide Research, Development and Public Health Action; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 1, pp. 1–48. [Google Scholar]
  167. Lydon, E.C.; Ko, E.R.; Tsalik, E.L. The Host Response as a Tool for Infectious Disease Diagnosis and Management. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn 2018, 18, 723–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Hetta, H.F.; Melhem, T.; Aljohani, H.M.; Salama, A.; Ahmed, R.; Elfadil, H.; Alanazi, F.E.; Ramadan, Y.N.; Battah, B.; Rottura, M.; et al. Beyond Conventional Antifungals: Combating Resistance Through Novel Therapeutic Pathways. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Friedman, D.Z.P.; Schwartz, I.S. Emerging Diagnostics and Therapeutics for Invasive Fungal Infections. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2023, 37, 593–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Ciotti, M.; Nicolai, E.; Pieri, M. Development and Optimization of Diagnostic Assays for Infectious Diseases. LabMed Discov. 2024, 1, 100032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Pepi, M.; Barretta, R.; Simões, D.; De Andrade, E.; Sabino, R. Fungi in a One Health Perspective. Encyclopedia 2023, 3, 900–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Examples of competitive strategies for resource acquisition in fungi.
Table 1. Examples of competitive strategies for resource acquisition in fungi.
FungusPrimary Carbon SourcesCarbon Metabolism StrategyEnvironmental AdaptabilityReference
Aspergillus fumigatusAmino acids, organic acids, simple sugarsVersatile use of fermentable and non-fermentable compounds; Urea/Nitrogen metabolismThrives in decaying organic matter and human lungs[23]
Candida albicansGlucose, lipids, host-derived sugars (e.g., galactose)Versatile metabolism of diverse sugars/amino acids; Fermentation and respiration linked to oxygenAdapts to mucosal surfaces and systemic infections[24]
Penicillium spp.Cellulose, ligninAmmonium, nitrate, amino acidsDecomposes plant material in soil and organic matter[25]
Cryptococcus neoformansGlucose, lactate, fatty acidsUrea and diverse nitrogen metabolism; Capsule synthesis linked to N availabilitySurvives in the brain during cryptococcal meningitis[26]
Fusarium solaniPolysaccharides, organic acidsAmino acids, peptidesAdapts to nitrogen-poor soil and plant infections[27]
Pichia kudriavzeviiAcetate, glycerolAcidic environment adaptationColonizes mucosal surfaces, resists antifungals[28]
Trichoderma spp.Lignocellulosic materialVarious organic and inorganic nitrogen sourcesDominates soil microbiomes, biological control agent[29]
Mucor circinelloidesSugars, organic acids, alcoholsFermentation and respiration based on oxygenSaprophytic growth in decomposing organic matter[30]
Aspergillus nigerStarch, cellulose, pectinDiverse nitrogen assimilationOutcompetes microbes in nutrient-rich environments[31]
Basidiobolus ranarumLipids, proteins, carbohydratesAdapted to varied nitrogen sourcesFound in soil, decaying matter, amphibian hosts[32]
Exophiala dermatitidisHydrocarbons, phenolic compounds, simple sugarsFlexible nitrogen metabolismSurvives in extreme environments (hot springs, pollution)[33]
Sporothrix schenckiiHost-derived amino acids, lipidsMelanin production for protectionAdapts to host tissues, causing sporotrichosis[34]
Rhizopus oryzaeStarches, lipids, proteinsRapid colonization of decaying materialGrows on spoiled food and agricultural waste[35]
Table 2. Examples of fungal strategies for organic matter decomposition, tissue invasion, and immune evasion.
Table 2. Examples of fungal strategies for organic matter decomposition, tissue invasion, and immune evasion.
FungusOrganic Material BreakdownHuman Tissue InvasionHydrolytic Enzyme Production & RegulationBiofilm FormationHost Defense EvasionReference
Aspergillus nigerProduces proteases, amylases, and cellulases to decompose organic matterProduces collagenases for tissue invasionRegulated by nutrient availability and environmental cuesForms biofilms on decaying matter and in tissuesProteases evade immune response, promoting infection[43]
Trichophyton speciesDegrades keratin and produces amylase for substrate breakdownKeratinase production for skin and nail infectionsGene expression activated during skin invasionForms biofilms on skin and nailsKeratinases allow penetration into skin and nails[44]
Candida albicansDegrades lipids and proteins for biofilm and tissue invasionPhospholipases aid mucosal invasion, SAPs for biofilm formationEnzyme production triggered by host signalsKnown for biofilm formation on medical devicesSAPs degrade immune proteins, evading immune response[24]
Fusarium speciesBreaks down plant materials with cellulases and amylasesCollagenases invade deeper tissues in immunocompromised hostsDual regulation: by host immune system & environmental cues (pH, nutrients).Forms biofilms in tissues, contributing to chronic infectionsCollagenases assist in evading immune defenses[45]
Aspergillus fumigatusBreaks down organic matter with proteases and lipasesElastases and collagenases invade lung and vascular tissueRegulated by inflammation and immune responsesBiofilm formation in lung tissue and other surfacesProteases degrade immune molecules, evading phagocytosis[23]
Histoplasma capsulatumProduces proteases and lipases for tissue invasionInvades lung tissue using proteases and lipasesRegulated by host immune signals during infectionBiofilm formation in host tissuesDegrades immune molecules to evade immunity[46]
Coccidioides immitisProduces proteases for organic material breakdownCollagenase production for lung tissue invasionRegulated by host environmental cuesForms biofilms in the lung and other tissuesProtease production aids immune evasion[47]
Sporothrix schenckiiProduces elastases and proteases for tissue invasionUses elastases and collagenases to invade connective tissueRegulated by immune responses and environmental stressForms biofilms on skin and connective tissue; bioinformatic predictions suggest potential for biofilm formation, though experimental validation is necessaryElastases help the fungus penetrate host tissues[34]
Table 3. Examples of thermotolerance mechanisms in medically relevant fungi.
Table 3. Examples of thermotolerance mechanisms in medically relevant fungi.
FungusMaximum Growth TemperatureKey Thermotolerance MechanismsReference
Aspergillus fumigatus~50 °C
-
Membrane lipid stability
-
Heat-responsive gene expression
[68]
Blastomyces dermatitidis~39 °C
-
Dimorphic switching (mold to yeast)
-
Upregulation of HSPs and stress-response genes
[69]
Candida albicans~37 °C
-
Heat shock protein (HSP) production
-
Morphological switching (yeast to hyphae)
[24]
Candiozyma auris~42 °C
-
Membrane modifications to withstand heat
-
High resilience against environmental and thermal stresses
[70]
Coccidioides immitis~42 °C
-
Transition to spherule form at human body temperature
-
Stress
-
Response proteins to manage thermal stress
[47]
Cryptococcus neoformans~40 °C
-
Melanin production for cellular stability under heat
[71]
Histoplasma capsulatum~37 °C
-
Thermal dimorphism (yeast form at 37 °C)
[69]
Paracoccidioides brasiliensis~37 °C
-
Dimorphic behavior (mold to yeast)
-
HSPs and oxidative stress management
[72]
Sporothrix schenckii~37 °C
-
Adaptations for growth at elevated temperatures
-
Altered cell wall composition for thermal stress tolerance
[34]
Talaromyces marneffei~37 °C
-
Thermal dimorphism
-
Regulation of key genes during temperature transitions
[73]
Table 4. Examples of melanized fungi: UV protection, oxidative stress resistance, and pathogenic factors.
Table 4. Examples of melanized fungi: UV protection, oxidative stress resistance, and pathogenic factors.
FungusUV ProtectionImmune Response ModulationEnvironmental AdaptationReference
Cryptococcus neoformansProtects against UV radiation in bird droppingsInhibits phagocytosisSurvives in diverse niches, including the human body[79]
Exophilia dermatitidisResists UV radiation in aquatic environmentsInhibits phagocytosisSurvives in aquatic and soil environments[60]
Alternaria alternataProtects against UV, surviving in outdoor environmentsModulates host immune response to promote fungal persistence.Survives in various environments, including plants[80]
Exophiala dermatitidisSurvives in outdoor environments with UV radiationModulates immune response via melanin and intracellular survivalAdaptable to aquatic and terrestrial environments[33]
Madurella mycetomatisUV resistance in soil environmentsIt scavenges ROS from immune cells and masks cell wall β-glucans to prevent immune recognition.Survives in extreme environmental conditions[81]
Fonsecaea pedrosoiProtects against UV in soil and human skinForms phagocytosis-resistant muriform cells; its melanin layer also scavenges ROS and masks PAMPsUV resistant, adapts to soil and human skin[82]
Table 5. Examples of medically important fungal species, their lifestyles, and associated infections.
Table 5. Examples of medically important fungal species, their lifestyles, and associated infections.
SpeciesLifestylePathogenic InfectionReference
Acremonium falciformeSaprophytic (soil, decaying organic matter)Cutaneous, corneal infections[94]
Alternaria alternataSaprophytic (decaying vegetation)Pulmonary infections, allergic reactions[95]
Aspergillus fumigatusSaprophytic (decaying vegetation)Pulmonary infection, invasive aspergillosis[68]
Aspergillus flavusSaprophytic (soil, decaying matter)Aspergillosis, keratitis, otomycosis[96]
Aspergillus nigerSaprophytic (decaying vegetation)Otomycosis, pulmonary aspergillosis[31]
Blastomyces dermatitidisSaprophytic (decaying wood, soil)Pulmonary and disseminated infection[69]
Bipolaris spp.Saprophytic (plants)Respiratory and cutaneous infections[97]
Candida albicansNormal microbiota (skin, mouth, gastrointestinal tract)Oral, vaginal and systemic[98]
Candidozyma aurisOpportunistic pathogen; colonizes skin, serving as a reservoir for healthcare-associated infectionsSkin colonization and disseminated infection[99]
Nakaseomyces glabrataNormal microbiota (gastrointestinal tract)Invasive candidiasis[100]
Candida tropicalisNormal microbiotaInvasive candidiasis[100]
Cladosporium cladosporioidesSaprophytic (decaying organic matter)Respiratory infections, allergies[101]
Coccidioides immitisSaprophytic (arid soil)Pulmonary and disseminated infection[69]
Cryptococcus neoformansSaprophytic (soil, excrement)Meningoencephalitis, pneumonia, CNS infection[98]
Cryptococcus gattiiSaprophytic (trees, soil)Meningoencephalitis, pneumonia, CNS infection[102]
Exophiala dermatitidisSaprophytic (soil, organic matter)Cutaneous, subcutaneous infections[33]
Fusarium spp.Saprophytic (soil, decaying plants)Keratitis, onychomycosis, disseminated infection[103]
Fusarium verticillioidesSaprophytic (decaying plants)Pulmonary and systemic infections[104]
Histoplasma capsulatumSaprophytic (soil contaminated with bird and bat droppings)Pulmonary infection, disseminated infection[69]
Lomentospora prolificansSaprophytic (soil, organic matter)Invasive infections (post-transplant, leukemia)[105]
Microsporum canisZoophilicDermatophytosis (tinea capitis, tinea corporis)[106]
Nannizzia gypsea (ex-Microsporum gypseum)Geophilic saprophyte; lives on keratin in soil.Dermatophytosis (tinea corporis, tinea capitis)[107]
Paracoccidioides brasiliensisSaprophytic (tropical soil, organic matter)Pulmonary and disseminated infection[72]
Paracoccidioides lutziiSaprophytic (soil)Pulmonary and disseminated infection[72]
Talaromyces marneffeiSaprophytic (soil, organic matter)Systemic infections (HIV/AIDS patients)[108]
Pneumocystis jiroveciiOpportunistic pathogen; asymptomatically colonizes the respiratory tract of immunocompetent hosts.Pneumonia in immunocompromised patients[109]
Rhizopus spp. (Mucormycetes)Saprophytic (decaying organic matter)Skin, sinuses and lung infections[110]
Scedosporium apiospermumSaprophytic (soil, water)Pulmonary and CNS infection[111]
Sporothrix schenckiiSaprophytic (soil, wood)Skin and lymphocutaneous infection[112]
Sporothrix brasiliensisSaprophytic (soil, wood) and ZoonoticSkin and lymphocutaneous infection[112]
Trichophyton mentagrophytesZoophilicDermatophytosis (tinea corporis, tinea capitis)[113]
Trichosporon asahiiNormal microbiota (skin, gastrointestinal tract)Invasive trichosporonosis, bloodstream and urinary tract infections[114]
Trichosporon inkinNormal microbiota (skin)White piedra, superficial infections, meningitis[115]
Trichosporon mucoidesNormal microbiota (skin, mucosa)Skin/hair, bloodstream infection[116]
Ustilago maydisSaprophytic (organic matter)Rarely pathogenic to humans; phytopathogen[117]
Table 6. Examples of human risk factors and their impact on fungal infections.
Table 6. Examples of human risk factors and their impact on fungal infections.
Risk FactorDescriptionFungal Infections AssociatedReference
ImmunosuppressionWeakened immune system due to HIV, cancer treatments, etc.Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus[16]
Use of Medical DevicesDevices that breach body barriers (e.g., catheters, implants)Candida (candidemia), Aspergillus, Mucor[123]
Broad-Spectrum AntibioticsDisruption of normal microbiota leading to fungal overgrowthCandida (oral thrush, vaginal candidiasis), Aspergillus, Fusarium[124]
Chronic DiseasesConditions like diabetes, liver/kidney diseaseCandida (candidiasis), Mucor (mucormycosis)[125]
AgeVulnerabilities due to immature or declining immune systemsCandida, Aspergillus[126]
Nutritional DeficienciesPoor nutrition weakening immune defensesInvasive fungal infections like Aspergillus[127]
Hospital SettingsHigh exposure to fungi in intensive care unitsAspergillus, Candida, Mucor[128]
Smoking & Chronic Lung DiseasesRespiratory damage (increased fungal infection risk)Aspergillus[129]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Corrêa-Junior, D.; Zamith-Miranda, D.; Frases, S.; Nosanchuk, J.D. From the Ground to the Clinic: The Evolution and Adaptation of Fungi. J. Fungi 2026, 12, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010008

AMA Style

Corrêa-Junior D, Zamith-Miranda D, Frases S, Nosanchuk JD. From the Ground to the Clinic: The Evolution and Adaptation of Fungi. Journal of Fungi. 2026; 12(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Corrêa-Junior, Dario, Daniel Zamith-Miranda, Susana Frases, and Joshua D. Nosanchuk. 2026. "From the Ground to the Clinic: The Evolution and Adaptation of Fungi" Journal of Fungi 12, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010008

APA Style

Corrêa-Junior, D., Zamith-Miranda, D., Frases, S., & Nosanchuk, J. D. (2026). From the Ground to the Clinic: The Evolution and Adaptation of Fungi. Journal of Fungi, 12(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010008

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop