Utility of Follow-Up Surveillance Echocardiograms in Uncomplicated Surgical Closures of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects: A Preliminary Analysis
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Population and Data Collection
2.2. Clinical Characteristic and Patient Demographics
2.3. Study Outcomes
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Limitations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hoffman, J.I.E.; Kaplan, S. The Incidence of Congenital Heart Disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 39, 1890–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chaudhry, T.A.; Younas, M.; Baig, A. Ventricular septal defect and associated complications. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2011, 61, 1001–1004. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Minette, M.S.; Sahn, D.J. Ventricular Septal Defects. Circulation 2006, 114, 2190–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scully, B.B.; Morales, D.L.; Zafar, F.; McKenzie, E.D.; Fraser, C.D., Jr.; Heinle, J.S. Current expectations for surgical repair of isolated ventricular septal defects. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2010, 89, 544–549, discussion 50–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meijboom, F.; Szatmari, A.; Utens, E.; Deckers, J.W.; Roelandt, J.R.; Bos, E.; Hess, J. Long-term follow-up after surgical closure of ventricular septal defect in infancy and childhood. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1994, 24, 1358–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sachdeva, R.; Valente, A.M.; Armstrong, A.K.; Cook, S.C.; Han, B.K.; Lopez, L.; Lui, G.K.; Pickard, S.S.; Powell, A.J.; Bhave, N.M.; et al. ACC/AHA/ASE/HRS/ISACHD/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/SOPE 2020 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging During the Follow-Up Care of Patients with Congenital Heart Disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 75, 657–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Menting, M.E.; Cuypers, J.A.; Opic, P.; Utens, E.M.; Witsenburg, M.; van den Bosch, A.E.; van Domburg, R.T.; Meijboom, F.J.; Boersma, E.; Bogers, A.J.; et al. The unnatural history of the ventricular septal defect: Outcome up to 40 years after surgical closure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015, 65, 1941–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baumgartner, H.; De Backer, J. The ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Adult Congenital Heart Disease 2020. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 4153–4154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anderson, B.R.; Stevens, K.N.; Nicolson, S.C.; Gruber, S.B.; Spray, T.L.; Wernovsky, G.; Gruber, P.J. Contemporary outcomes of surgical ventricular septal defect closure. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2013, 145, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gurvitz, M.; Krieger, E.V.; Fuller, S.; Davis, L.L.; Kittleson, M.M.; Aboulhosn, J.A.; Bradley, E.A.; Buber, J.; Daniels, C.J.; Dimopoulos, K.; et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/HRS/ISACHD/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2025, 87, 822–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baumgartner, H.; De Backer, J.; Babu-Narayan, S.V.; Budts, W.; Chessa, M.; Diller, G.P.; Lung, B.; Kluin, J.; Lang, I.M.; Meijboom, F.; et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 563–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]


| Characteristic | Primary Closure N (%) = 9 | Patch Closure N (%) = 108 | Overall N (%) = 117 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at Surgery (months) | |||
| Mean (SD) | 17 (23) | 18 (34) | 18 (33) |
| Median (Q1, Q3) | 10 (4, 13) | 6 (4, 14) | 6 (4, 13) |
| Min, Max | 4, 75 | 1, 230 | 1, 230 |
| Total Echoes obtained >1 year post-op | |||
| Mean (SD) | 1.33 (1.12) | 1.81 (1.40) | 1.78 (1.38) |
| Median (Q1, Q3) | 2.00 (0.00, 2.00) | 2.00 (1.00, 2.00) | 2.00 (1.00, 2.00) |
| Min, Max | 0.00, 3.00 | 0.00, 7.00 | 0.00, 7.00 |
| Follow-up Outcome | |||
| Follow with Cardiology | 6 (67%) | 79 (73%) | 85 (73%) |
| Discharged from Cardiology | 1 (11%) | 3 (2.8%) | 4 (3.4%) |
| Lost to Follow-up | 2 (22%) | 26 (24%) | 28 (24%) |
| Deceased | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Characteristic | Pre-op Echo N (%) = 117 | Immediate Post-op N (%) = 117 | >1 Year Post-op N (%) = 116 | Most Recent Post-op N (%) = 117 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time Since Surgery (Months) | ||||
| Mean (SD) | −2 (1) | 0 (0) | 22 (27) | 94 (70) |
| Median (Q1, Q3) | −1 (−2, −1) | 0 (0, 0) | 13 (6, 22) | 83 (35, 135) |
| Min, Max | −6, 0 | 0, 1 | 1, 143 | 12, 266 |
| VSD | ||||
| No | 0 (0%) | 80 (70%) | 115 (100%) | 117 (100%) |
| Yes | 117 (100%) | 35 (30%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| LA Dilation | ||||
| None | 19 (16%) | 50 (43%) | 102 (88%) | 115 (98%) |
| Mild | 51 (44%) | 59 (50%) | 13 (11%) | 2 (1.7%) |
| Moderate | 43 (37%) | 8 (6.8%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) |
| Severe | 4 (3.4%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| LV Dilation | ||||
| None | 33 (28%) | 83 (71%) | 114 (98%) | 117 (100%) |
| Mild | 44 (38%) | 25 (21%) | 2 (1.7%) | 0 (0%) |
| Moderate | 34 (29%) | 8 (6.8%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Severe | 6 (5.1%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Mitral Regurgitation | ||||
| None | 106 (92%) | 101 (88%) | 110 (97%) | 111 (99%) |
| Mild | 7 (6.1%) | 13 (11%) | 3 (2.7%) | 1 (0.9%) |
| Moderate | 2 (1.7%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Severe | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Unknown | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| RA Dilation | ||||
| None | 107 (91%) | 107 (92%) | 114 (98%) | 116 (99%) |
| Mild | 10 (8.5%) | 9 (7.8%) | 2 (1.7%) | 1 (0.9%) |
| Moderate | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Severe | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| RV Dilation | ||||
| None | 107 (91%) | 112 (96%) | 116 (100%) | 117 (100%) |
| Mild | 10 (8.5%) | 5 (4.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Moderate | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Severe | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Tricuspid Regurgitation | ||||
| None | 101 (87%) | 91 (78%) | 107 (92%) | 106 (91%) |
| Mild | 13 (11%) | 24 (21%) | 9 (7.8%) | 11 (9.4%) |
| Moderate | 2 (1.7%) | 2 (1.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Severe | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Unknown | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Morbidities/ Complications | ||||
| No | 113 (97%) | 75 (64%) | 114 (98%) | 113 (97%) |
| Yes | 3 (2.6%) | 42 (36%) | 2 (1.7%) | 4 (3.4%) |
| Unknown | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Atrial Arhythmias | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Ventricular Arrhythmias | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.9%) |
| Pulmonary HTN | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Decreased LV Function | 0 (0%) | 30 (26%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.9%) |
| LVOTO | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.9%) |
| RVOTO | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Effusion | 0 (0%) | 9 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Other | 3 (2.6%) | 3 (2.6%) | 2 (1.7%) | 2 (1.7%) |
| Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complications | ||||
| Time since surgery | 48 months | 29 months | 73 months | 34 months |
| TTE finding | Non-obstructive subaortic ridge | Mild pulmonary vein stenosis | Pinhole residual VSD | Ventricular ectopy with dysfunction |
| Symptomatic | No | No | No | Yes |
| Last Clinic Visit | ||||
| Number of TTEs post-repair | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Last TTE post-repair | 85 months | 29 months | 161 months | 80 months |
| TTE finding | Subaortic ridge still present | Stable RLPV gradient | Resolution of the residual VSD | Persistent ectopy and dysfunction |
| Change in management | No | No | No | Medication and RVOT ablation |
| Outcome | Follows with cardiology | Follows with cardiology | Discharged from cardiology | Lost to follow-up |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Maney, M.; Richardson, C.; Kistler, I.; Fichtner, S.; Jacobs, H.; Aldrich, J.B.; Cua, C.L. Utility of Follow-Up Surveillance Echocardiograms in Uncomplicated Surgical Closures of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects: A Preliminary Analysis. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2026, 13, 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd13060281
Maney M, Richardson C, Kistler I, Fichtner S, Jacobs H, Aldrich JB, Cua CL. Utility of Follow-Up Surveillance Echocardiograms in Uncomplicated Surgical Closures of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects: A Preliminary Analysis. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2026; 13(6):281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd13060281
Chicago/Turabian StyleManey, Macala, Carson Richardson, Isaac Kistler, Samantha Fichtner, Hannah Jacobs, Julie B. Aldrich, and Clifford L. Cua. 2026. "Utility of Follow-Up Surveillance Echocardiograms in Uncomplicated Surgical Closures of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects: A Preliminary Analysis" Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 13, no. 6: 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd13060281
APA StyleManey, M., Richardson, C., Kistler, I., Fichtner, S., Jacobs, H., Aldrich, J. B., & Cua, C. L. (2026). Utility of Follow-Up Surveillance Echocardiograms in Uncomplicated Surgical Closures of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects: A Preliminary Analysis. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 13(6), 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd13060281

