Next Article in Journal
Risk Factors of Secondary Cardiovascular Events in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Malaysia
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of the Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft for Aortic Valve Replacement: Is It Still an Option?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCDD
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/jcdd10060249
jcdd-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Frequency and Clinical Impact of Family History of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Vasospastic Angina

by
Hiroki Teragawa
*,
Yuko Uchimura
,
Chikage Oshita
,
Yu Hashimoto
and
Shuichi Nomura
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, JR Hiroshima Hospital, 3-1-36, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku, Hiroshima 732-0057, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10(6), 249; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10060249
Submission received: 7 May 2023 / Revised: 1 June 2023 / Accepted: 7 June 2023 / Published: 8 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Clinical Research)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Family history (FH) of coronary artery disease (CAD) [FH-CAD] is a well-known risk factor for atherosclerotic CAD. However, FH-CAD frequency in patients with vasospastic angina (VSA) remains unknown, and the clinical characteristics and prognosis of VSA patients with FH-CAD are unclear. Therefore, this study compared FH-CAD frequency between patients with atherosclerotic CAD and those with VSA and examined the clinical characteristics and prognosis of VSA patients with FH-CAD. Methods: Coronary angiography and spasm provocation tests (SPT) were used to investigate chest pain of coronary artery origin in patients classified into atherosclerotic CAD (362 cases), VSA (221 cases; positive for SPT) and non-VSA (73 cases; negative for SPT) groups, with FH-CAD being defined. In the VSA group, flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) and nitroglycerin-independent vasodilation (NID) via brachial artery echocardiography and clinical symptoms in the groups with and without FH-CAD were checked, with Kaplan–Meier curves revealing major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiac death and rehospitalisation for cardiovascular disease) between the two groups. Results: The atherosclerotic CAD group had a significantly lower FH-CAD frequency (12%, p = 0.029) than the VSA (19%) and non-VSA groups (19%). FH-CAD was more common in females in the VSA and non-VSA groups than in the atherosclerotic CAD group (p < 0.001). Nonpharmacological treatment for CAD in FH-CAD was more common in the atherosclerotic CAD group (p = 0.017). In the VSA group, FH-CAD tended to be more common in females (p = 0.052). Although no differences in FMD of the brachial artery were observed between the groups, the FH-CAD (+) group had significantly higher NID than the FH-CAD (−) group (p = 0.023). Kaplan–Meier’s analysis revealed a similar prognosis between the two groups, and other clinical characteristics did not differ. Conclusion: Patients with VSA have a higher FH-CAD frequency than those with atherosclerotic CAD, especially in females. Although FH-CAD may affect vascular function in patients with VSA, its effect on the severity and prognosis of VSA appears to be minimal. FH-CAD and its confirmation may assist in CAD diagnosis, especially in female patients.

1. Introduction

Vasospastic angina (VSA) is a disease in which epicardial coronary arteries constrict, resulting in myocardial ischemia that induces resting angina pectoris or exertional angina, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure and sudden death [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Recently, more emphasis has been placed on the aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of VSA as a cause of ischemia and myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Several risk factors, including serum biomarkers, for coronary spasms have been reported [7,8,9], among which smoking is considered an important risk factor [3,10,11].
Family history (FH) of CAD [FH-CAD] is a risk factor for atherosclerotic CAD [12,13,14,15,16,17], and some reports have demonstrated that FH-CAD may also be a risk factor for VSA, especially in female patients [18,19,20]. However, studies comparing FH-CAD frequency between patients with VSA and those with atherosclerotic CAD while exploring FH-CAD effects on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with VSA remain scarce. Therefore, this study investigates whether the frequency of FH-CAD in patients with VSA differs from that in patients with other CAD types, especially atherosclerotic CAD, among patients who underwent coronary angiography in our hospital, and how it affects the clinical characteristics and prognosis in patients with VSA.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

This was an observational and retrospective study involving 781 patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) for the evaluation of possible CAD-related chest pain. Initially, cases of aortic stenosis and other valvular diseases, as well as cases of dilated, hypertrophic, restrictive and takotsubo cardiomyopathies performed to exclude CAD, were excluded from the study. For patients undergoing repeat CAG, the initially obtained data were used. Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (n = 4) were excluded from the study. The electrocardiogram revealed no cases of Brugada syndrome or QT prolongation syndrome. Cases with missing FH or blood test data were also excluded (n = 28). Among the remaining 749 patients, 78 patients without significant atherosclerotic stenosis on CAG did not undergo a spasm provocation test (SPT) due to symptoms or at the discretion of the attending physician, and they were excluded. There were 377 patients with established CAD (significant coronary stenosis with any findings suggestive of myocardial ischemia) or with a previous history of CAD and 294 patients with no significant coronary stenosis who underwent SPT due to their symptoms. Fifteen patients with significant coronary stenosis who had been diagnosed with coronary spasms after SPT based on their symptoms were also excluded from the study. The final analysis was performed on 656 patients (408 males and 248 females; mean age, 68 years; Figure 1). Based on the results of CAG and/or SPT, 656 patients were divided into three groups: atherosclerotic CAD group (n = 362), VSA group (n = 221) and non-VSA group (n = 73) (Figure 1).
The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of our institution. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

2.2. Coronary Angiography (CAG) and Spasm Provocation Test (SPT)

Patients with documented coronary stenosis detected via cardiac computed tomography, positive ischemic findings discovered via exercise stress electrocardiograms (ECG) or pharmacological stress myocardial perfusion imaging or typical ischemic chest symptoms during exercise continued to take all prescribed medications. Using radial artery or brachial artery approaches, a diagnostic CAG was conducted using 4-French gage (4-Fr) or 5-French Judkins diagnostic catheters. In addition, 300-µg nitroglycerin (NTG) was administered intravenously or intracoronarily immediately following the sheath’s placement. An autoinjector (ZoneMaster, Sheen Man, Osaka, Japan) capable of injecting 5 mL of contrast media at 2.5 mL/s was used to create an angiogram from several projections. After an intravenous infusion of adenosine triphosphate, we measured the fractional flow reserve (FFR) to determine the functionality of organic stenosis in cases where a moderate atherosclerotic lesion was identified on angiograms (Prime-Wire Prestige Plus Guide Wire or Verrata Pressure Guide Wire, Phillips Volcano Therapeutics Inc., Rancho Cordova, CA, USA) [21].
In patients with suspected VSA or with chest symptoms at rest alone, during exercise, or both at rest and during exercise, except for sublingual NTG, which was only withheld starting 1 h before catheterisation, all antianginal medications were stopped at least 48 h prior to catheterisation. Using the percutaneous brachial route, we conducted an SPT following the usual diagnostic CAG. Through inserting it through the medial cubital vein or internal jugular vein, a 5-Fr transient pacing catheter (Bipolar Balloon Catheter, Bebrawn, Melsungen, Germany) was set to 50 beats per minute. Using a multichannel recorder, continuous monitoring and recording of arterial pressure, heart rate and ECG measurements were performed (Polygraph 1600, Nihon Electric Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
The conduct of routine SPT has been previously described [22,23,24]. Briefly, after the initial CAG, acetylcholine (ACh) doses of 20 or 50 µg were injected into the right coronary artery (RCA) for 20 s, with 3 min breaks in between doses. If the 50 µg dose failed to induce coronary spasms, a maximum of 80 µg ACh was injected into the RCA. The highest ACh infusion or induction of coronary spasms was followed by instantaneous CAG. After inducing a spasm in the RCA, we injected 50 or 100 µg ACh into the left coronary artery (LCA) for 20 s, with 3 min breaks in between doses. A maximum of 200 µg ACh was injected into the LCA, with or without 20, 40 or 60 µg of methylergometrine, if 200 µg ACh induced no coronary spasms. The highest ACh infusion or induction of coronary spasms was followed by instantaneous CAG. We completed the last CAG of the LCA after intracoronary administration of 300 µg NTG. If the patient’s haemodynamics remained unstable, small doses of catecholamines were given intravenously or via the coronary artery. The RCA and LCA received 20 µg and 50 µg, respectively, of low dosages of ACh (L-ACh) in this investigation.

2.3. Definition of CAG and Coronary Spasm-Related Factors

Strategies for measuring coronary artery diameters have been described in [23,24]. For a quantitative investigation, we selected spastic and atherosclerotic segments. A single researcher who was blinded to the clinical information evaluated the luminal diameters in each case using an end-diastolic frame in a computer-assisted coronary angiographic analysis system (CAAS II/QUANTCOR; Siemens, Berlin, Germany). Measurements were made three times, and analysis was performed using the average value. Changes in coronary artery diameter induced via ACh and NTG infusions were expressed as percentage changes from baseline angiographic data.
Lesions with stenosis exceeding 20% were classified as atherosclerotic lesions. Organic stenosis was defined as a percent stenosis value exceeding 50% and/or an FFR value of 0.8. We looked for myocardial bridging (MB) [25,26], a well-known associator of VSA. An MB was defined as a systolic narrowing of the coronary artery diameter by more than 20% compared to that in diastole [27]. Variant angina (VA) was defined as angina with an ECG spontaneous ST elevation. VSA was identified during the SPT as 90% constriction of the coronary arteries on angiograms, as well as the presence of characteristic chest pain and/or an ST-segment deviation on the ECG [28]. Multivessel spasm (MVS) was characterised as coronary spasms involving two major coronary arteries, whereas single-vessel spasms were classified as involving just one major coronary artery. Because we could not ascertain whether the SPT obtained a negative result in another coronary artery after the necessary use of NTG in one coronary artery with coronary spasms during the SPT, such patients were excluded from the analysis of the frequency of MVS. According to the American Heart Association, a focal spasm is characterised by a transitory vessel narrowing of >90% within the boundaries of a single isolated coronary segment. A 90% diffuse vasoconstriction in two adjacent coronary segments of the coronary arteries was used to characterise a diffuse spasm [29]. Focal spasms are considered one of the poor prognostic factors in VSA [29,30], and this study investigated the frequency of focal spasms. A focal spasm was considered to have occurred in either coronary artery in the instance of MVS. The following characteristics were also examined: the frequencies of L-ACh-induced spasms, total occlusion (TOC) of a coronary artery caused by spasms and ST elevation on ECG.

2.4. Definitions of FH-CAD

FH-CAD was determined through interviewing patients and their family members or through using information from their electronic medical records. The first question asked whether any family members (first-degree relatives) had suffered from angina pectoris or myocardial infarction or had died suddenly of heart problems, thus confirming the presence of FH-CAD in first-degree relatives [17]. Second, even if the information was unavailable due to parental divorce or if parents did not have such FH-CAD, second-degree relatives, especially siblings, were asked if there were two or more patients from angina, myocardial infarction or sudden cardiac death, and such second-degree relatives were included in the FH-CAD in this study. A history of non-pharmacologic treatment for CAD, such as percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft, and probable sudden death of presumed cardiac origin were also investigated in first- and second-degree relatives. Some of the sudden deaths were unclear to be of cardiac origin based on the interview, but if information was obtained during the interview that the sudden death was due to cerebrovascular disease, that information was adopted and excluded from the FH-CAD in this study. The FH of premature onset of CAD (males aged <55 years and females aged <65 years) was not adopted in this study because patients and other family members could not accurately determine the age of onset of the disease of relatives or because we did not check the age of onset in some of the cases. Nevertheless, the onset of CAD and sudden cardiac death in clearly elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) were excluded from our definition of FH-CAD.

2.5. Parameters

The patients’ current smoking behaviour, especially as active smokers, was documented. Alcohol consumption was defined as drinking at least once per week [31]. A systolic blood pressure of at least 140 mmHg, a diastolic blood pressure of at least 90 mmHg or the uses of antihypertensive medication were all considered indicators of hypertension. Before CAG, blood chemistry parameters were examined in a fasted state in the morning. The existence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was determined using accepted criteria, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2) was computed using the accepted formula [32]. A low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of less than 120 mg/dL or the use of drugs for dyslipidaemia was considered dyslipidaemia. A fasting blood sugar level of more than 126 mg/dL, an Hb A1c level morethan 6.5% or the use of antidiabetic drugs were considered indicators of diabetes mellitus (DM). In order to calculate the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), cardiac ultrasonography was used. As previously mentioned [33,34], the functions of endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and endothelium-independent NTG-induced dilation (NID) were evaluated.
The frequency of VA or other significant symptoms (such as cold sweating and syncope) as well as anginal attacks that happened at rest or after physical exercise were also examined as associated parameters of VSA. Although only one angina attack occurred in some cases, the total number of angina attacks was determined through estimating the frequency of angina episodes each month between the onset of chest discomfort and hospital admission. The time of onset of the anginal attack was estimated and the time to hospitalisation was used as the estimated diseased duration.
After discharge, patients received follow-up care at our facility, with at least one follow-up visit for each study participant. Follow-up assessments included medication details recorded from patients’ medication diaries, as well as the number of angina events and use of coronary vasodilators in the previous three months (per month). The final data collection was planned to end in March 2023. The number of coronary vasodilators was assessed at the last follow-up. Cardiac events were tracked, including readmission for angina or other cardiovascular problems, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were defined as death from cardiac causes or readmission for cardiovascular reasons [24,33,34].

2.6. Statistical Analyses

Mean and standard deviation were used to convey regularly distributed data, while median was used to express normally distributed but non-continuous data (interquartile range). Using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Student’s unpaired t-test or Chi-square test, the groups’ initial characteristics were compared. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve and log-rank test were used to analyse MACEs. All statistical analyses were performed utilising JMP Ver. 16 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The cutoff for statistical significance was a p value of 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Patients’ Characteristics and Frequency of FH-CAD of the Three Groups

The atherosclerotic CAD, VSA and non-VSA groups included 362, 221 and 73 patients, respectively (Figure 1). Table 1 presents the patients’ characteristics. While the atherosclerotic CAD group had older patients than the VSA and non-VSA groups, it had significantly higher frequencies of men, dyslipidaemia, DM and CKD and significantly lower LVEF on echocardiography. Active smokers were less frequent in the non-VSA group (p = 0.012). Notably, body mass index and hypertension did not differ significantly among the three groups (Table 1).
Table 2 lists the obtained FH-CAD frequencies, which were 12%, 19% and 19% in the atherosclerotic CAD, VSA and non-VSA groups, respectively, with a significantly lower incidence of FH-CAD in the atherosclerotic CAD group (p = 0.029, Figure 2). The VSA and non-VSA groups had comparable FH-CAD frequencies.
When only patients with FH-CAD were included in the analysis, the three groups had different frequencies of male and female patients (p < 0.001), with the atherosclerotic CAD group having a higher frequency of male patients. The frequency of first-degree relatives only, second-degree relatives only and sudden cardiac death did not differ between the three groups. However, the atherosclerotic CAD group had a greater frequency of nonpharmacologic treatment for CAD than the other two groups (p = 0.017, Table 2).

3.2. Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis in VSA Patients Based on the Presence of FH-CAD

As noted above, FH-CAD was present in 42 patients with VSA (19%, FH-CAD (+) VSA group) and absent in 179 patients (81%, FH-CAD (−) VSA group). Table 3 presents the clinical characteristics in the two groups. Age did not differ significantly between the two groups, although a trend existed toward more female patients (p = 0.052). No significant differences were observed in conventional coronary risk factors, CKD frequency, or LVEF between the two groups.
As determined via brachial ultrasonography, the brachial artery diameter at baseline and FMD did not significantly differ between the two groups; however, NID was significantly greater in the FH-CAD (+) group than in the FH-CAD (−) group (p = 0.023). While both groups showed no difference in other symptoms related to coronary spasms, including occurrence time, estimated duration, number of monthly anginal pain and VA frequency, they also did not differ in the frequency of atherosclerotic lesions or MB in CAG. Notably, no difference was observed in the frequency of coronary spasms induced via L-ACh, TOC, focal spasms, MVS, ST elevation during SPT and unavoidable use of NTG during SPT (Table 4).

3.3. Prognosis in VSA Patients Based on FH-CAD

The median (interquartile range) follow-up period was 88 (45, 112) months. The average number of monthly anginal attacks and number of coronary vasodilators at the final follow-up were not different between the two groups (n = 135 and 35 in the FH-CAD (−) and FH-CAD (+) groups, respectively; Table 4). The thirty-four confirmed MACE cases included one for cardiac arrest, six for heart failure, four for percutaneous coronary intervention, eighteen for rehospitalisation due to unstable angina, one for acute myocardial infarction, one for mitral valve plasty, one for the need of an implantation of a permanent pacemaker, one for endovascular therapy for lower extremity arterial disease and one for cerebrovascular disease. No difference was observed in the frequency of MACEs between the two groups (log-rank, p = 0.923; Figure 3).

4. Discussion

This study examined FH-CAD frequency among patients diagnosed with VSA and determined whether any differences existed in terms of frequency and characteristics when compared to patients with atherosclerotic CAD. Patients with VSA had a higher FH-CAD frequency than those with atherosclerotic CAD, with this frequency being more prevalent in female patients. The FH-CAD content also varied between the two groups. While female patients with VSA tended to exhibit a higher FH-CAD frequency than their male counterparts, peripheral ultrasonography revealed that VSA patients with FH-CAD responded better to NTG. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that FH-CAD is not an indicator of coronary spasm severity or prognosis. In patients with possible coronary spasms, especially female patients, FH-CAD and its description during the interview may be clues for VSA diagnosis.
FH-CAD, especially young-onset CAD, is undeniably a risk factor for atherosclerotic CAD [12,13,14,15,16,17]. According to research, 12.2% of patients over the age of 20 had a parent or sibling who had suffered a heart attack or angina pectoris before turning 50 [35]. A significant issue with FH-CAD is its lack of a uniform definition, and its frequency depends on its definition [17]. Its frequency may also differ based on how the target patient population is defined and whether it is limited to younger age groups [36]. Regarding VSA, several studies have demonstrated the importance of FH-CAD in patients with VSA [18,19,20,29,37], with many finding FH-CAD frequency in the 10% range [18,19,29,37], although this frequency seems to exceed 52% when the definition of FH-CAD that includes stroke is used [20]. Until now, only a few studies have compared FH-CAD frequency in patients with atherosclerotic CAD and VSA. The definition employed in the present study included not only first-degree relatives but also second-degree relatives with CAD or sudden cardiac death, constituting a rather broad definition. Certainly, this expansive definition could have yielded a higher FH-CAD frequency than those reported previously [18,19,29,37]. However, the strength of our study lies in its use of a uniform definition, which revealed a higher FH-CAD frequency in patients with VSA than in those with atherosclerotic CAD. In addition, we reported the sex differences as well as differences in FH-CAD content when comparing the two groups. While patients with atherosclerotic CAD had more nonpharmacological treatments in their FH, the VSA and non-VSA groups had fewer nonpharmacological treatments in their FH-CAD. While interviewing about FH-CAD, we confirmed not only the presence or absence of FH-CAD but also the sex difference in relatives with CAD and the treatment received by relatives with CAD. This information for FH-CAD may help differentiate the presence of atherosclerotic CAD or coronary artery dysfunction, such as VSA. Future studies are needed to confirm the novelty of this study in a multi-centre registry or in other studies.
Despite the abundance of studies on the heritability of VSA, including polymorphisms in eNOS [38,39] and aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 [40,41], sex differences in abnormalities of these genes remain unexplored. VSA patients with and without FH-CAD showed no significant sex differences (p = 0.052), although a trend toward a higher FH-CAD frequency in females existed, corroborating previous clinical findings [18,19,20]. Although VSA pathogenesis may be diverse and not singly deterministic, the possibility of a hereditary component, especially in women, is an important finding in VSA diagnosis. Notably, FH-CAD effects on the clinical manifestations of VSA are unknown. In the present study, although not all patients were evaluated, the subject group examined for brachial artery peripheral vascular function showed no difference in FMD, but a significant increase in NID was observed. Whether this indicates relative vascular endothelial dysfunction or vascular smooth muscle dysfunction at baseline is unclear, but some vascular dysfunction may be present in VSA patients with FH-CAD. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between FH-CAD and vascular function in patients with VSA in a multi-centre registry and/or the relationship between genetic abnormalities in eNOS, FH-CAD and vascular dysfunction in specialised centres. While studies have not explored the FH-CAD effect on the prognosis of patients with VSA [19,29,37,42], our study examined reported prognostic factors for coronary spasms, including VA, focal spasms and MVS [24,29,30,42], but did not find any association between FH-CAD and these prognostic factors. Based on the Kaplan–Meier curve for the MACE-free event rate, we concluded that an insignificant association existed between FH-CAD and prognosis in patients with VSA.
The present study also showed that the FH-CAD frequency in patients without significant stenosis and negative SPT (non-VSA group) was similar to that in the VSA group. The frequency of FH in sudden cardiac death may be lower in the non-VSA group (7%), although this difference was not significant compared with the VSA group (26%). Although the number of cases in the non-VSA group was quite small to allow for sufficient analysis, the occurrence of sudden cardiac death might help in differentiating patients with VSA from those without VSA. On the contrary, some studies have reported a higher FH-CAD frequency in patients with VSA than in those without VSA [29,37,43]. This discrepancy may be due to differences in the definition of FH-CAD or in the characteristics of the studied patients (a paper [43] examined coronary spasms and FH-CAD in patients with MINOCA). In addition, the non-VSA group did not undergo coronary microvascular function tests, which are commonly administered these days [44], during this study. Therefore, important pathological types such as microvascular spasms and/or coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) could not be differentiated [28,45]. Given the existence of a relationship between FH-CAD and CMD [46], future studies are needed clarify the FH-CAD effect on clinical symptoms and prognosis of microvascular spasms and/or CMD after differentiating the pathologic type.
This study has several limitations. First, it was conducted using a small sample size and was retrospectively performed at only one institution, raising questions about the generalisability of the results. Second, FH-CAD lacks a standard definition [17]. The definition of FH-CAD often uses cases occurring in the first degree of consanguinity, but we included cases in the second degree of consanguinity due to the potential for heritability. The variability in the FH-CAD definition, which affects its frequency [17], highlights the need for standardised definitions in future research. The reliability of FH-CAD appears to be decreasing [47] due to difficulties in rigorously examining FH in clinical research. In addition, the age of onset is often ambiguously defined as being in the 50s or 60s and because of our lack of confirmation of the age of onset, evaluating premature FH-CAD accurately in this study is difficult. Third, although coronary spasms can occur even with organic stenosis in daily clinical practice [48], such cases were excluded from this study (n = 15) because the frequency of FH-CAD in patients between atherosclerotic CAD and VSA was separated. However, we only excluded patients who had atherosclerotic CAD and a positive SPT result based on symptoms, such as chest pain at rest. Previous studies have also reported coronary spasms after implantation of drug-eluting stents [28,49]. Thus, this group of patients with atherosclerotic CAD will test positive for coronary spasms if they undergo SPT. In addition, 78 patients without significant coronary stenosis were excluded based on their symptoms or according to the judgment of their attending physicians. However, if we had conducted an SPT in this group, they would have been included in the VSA and non-VSA groups, and the results might have been different. Fourth, the Achilles tendon was touched but not measured, and patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and Brugada syndrome could not be ruled out based on a single ECG because the ECG may change from day to day. Fifth, the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and other methods for evaluating the quality of chest pain are available, but we could not evaluate them in this study. Finally, insufficient prognostic information may have been collected since we failed to follow the patients closely enough.

5. Conclusions

We investigated FH-CAD frequency in patients with VSA and determined whether any differences existed in terms of frequency and characteristics when compared to patients with atherosclerotic CAD. Patients with VSA exhibited a higher FH-CAD frequency than patients with atherosclerotic CAD, with this frequency being more prevalent in female patients. The FH-CAD content also differed between the two groups. While female patients with VSA tended to exhibit a higher FH-CAD frequency than their male counterparts, peripheral ultrasonography revealed that VSA patients with FH-CAD responded better to NTG. Notably, this study revealed that FH-CAD is not an indicator of coronary spasm severity or prognosis. FH-CAD and its description during the interview may aid in VSA diagnosis in patients with possible coronary spasms, especially female patients. A multi-centre registry should confirm the effect of FH-CAD on its frequency and clinical manifestations in patients with CMD and VSA.

Author Contributions

H.T., Y.U., C.O., Y.H. and S.N. were involved in patient enrolment and the collection of clinical data. H.T. wrote the whole manuscript, and Y.U., C.O., Y.H. and S.N. checked the manuscript before submission. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the JR Hiroshima Hospital (protocol code: 2023-1; date of approval: 11 April 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all patients who underwent SPT before the procedure. The opt-out method was adopted due to the retrospective design of the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the entire staff of the cardiac catheterisation room and the entire nursing staff of the Cardiovascular Medicine Ward, JR Hiroshima Hospital.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yasue, H.; Kugiyama, K. Coronary spasm: Clinical features and pathogenesis. Intern. Med 1997, 36, 760–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Yasue, H.; Nakagawa, H.; Itoh, T.; Harada, E.; Mizuno, Y. Coronary artery spasm--clinical features, diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment. J. Cardiol. 2008, 51, 2–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Group, J.C.S.J.W. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of patients with vasospastic angina (Coronary Spastic Angina) (JCS 2013). Circ. J. 2014, 78, 2779–2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Jewulski, J.; Khanal, S.; Dahal, K. Coronary vasospasm: A narrative review. World J. Cardiol. 2021, 13, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rehan, R.; Weaver, J.; Yong, A. Coronary Vasospastic Angina: A Review of the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management. Life 2022, 12, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, L.; Shen, Y.; Yu, B.; Xu, C.; Zhao, X.; Lin, X.; Lin, Z. Coronary Artery Spasm: Risk Factors, Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Novel Diagnostic Approaches. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 23, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Watanabe, K.; Shishido, T.; Otaki, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Sugai, T.; Toshima, T.; Takahashi, T.; Yokoyama, M.; Kinoshita, D.; Murase, T.; et al. Increased plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity deteriorates coronary artery spasm. Heart Vessel. 2019, 34, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, X.; Lin, Z.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Z.; Xu, C.; Yu, B.; Gao, P.; Wang, Z.; Ge, J.; Shen, Y.; et al. Serum SELENBP1 and VCL Are Effective Biomarkers for Clinical and Forensic Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Spasm. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, B.; Xu, C.; Tang, X.; Liu, Z.; Lin, X.; Meng, H.; Shi, C.; Ma, K.; Xiao, B.; Li, L. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-related secretory proteins as biomarkers of early myocardial ischemia-induced sudden cardiac deaths. Int. J. Legal. Med. 2022, 136, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nobuyoshi, M.; Abe, M.; Nosaka, H.; Kimura, T.; Yokoi, H.; Hamasaki, N.; Shindo, T.; Kimura, K.; Nakamura, T.; Nakagawa, Y.; et al. Statistical analysis of clinical risk factors for coronary artery spasm: Identification of the most important determinant. Am. Heart J. 1992, 124, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sugiishi, M.; Takatsu, F. Cigarette smoking is a major risk factor for coronary spasm. Circulation 1993, 87, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kannel, W.B.; Feinleib, M.; McNamara, P.M.; Garrison, R.J.; Castelli, W.P. An investigation of coronary heart disease in families. The Framingham offspring study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1979, 110, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shea, S.; Ottman, R.; Gabrieli, C.; Stein, Z.; Nichols, A. Family history as an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1984, 4, 793–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Hopkins, P.N.; Williams, R.R.; Kuida, H.; Stults, B.M.; Hunt, S.C.; Barlow, G.K.; Ash, K.O. Family history as an independent risk factor for incident coronary artery disease in a high-risk cohort in Utah. Am. J. Cardiol. 1988, 62, 703–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jorde, L.B.; Williams, R.R. Relation between family history of coronary artery disease and coronary risk variables. Am. J. Cardiol. 1988, 62, 708–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Myers, R.H.; Kiely, D.K.; Cupples, L.A.; Kannel, W.B. Parental history is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease: The Framingham Study. Am. Heart J. 1990, 120, 963–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Patel, J.; Al Rifai, M.; Scheuner, M.T.; Shea, S.; Blumenthal, R.S.; Nasir, K.; Blaha, M.J.; McEvoy, J.W. Basic vs More Complex Definitions of Family History in the Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2018, 93, 1213–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Takagi, Y.; Yasuda, S.; Tsunoda, R.; Ogata, Y.; Seki, A.; Sumiyoshi, T.; Matsui, M.; Goto, T.; Tanabe, Y.; Sueda, S.; et al. Clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis of vasospastic angina patients who survived out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Multicenter registry study of the Japanese Coronary Spasm Association. Circ. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2011, 4, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kawana, A.; Takahashi, J.; Takagi, Y.; Yasuda, S.; Sakata, Y.; Tsunoda, R.; Ogata, Y.; Seki, A.; Sumiyoshi, T.; Matsui, M.; et al. Gender differences in the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with vasospastic angina—A report from the Japanese Coronary Spasm Association. Circ. J. 2013, 77, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ong, P.; Pirozzolo, G.; Athanasiadis, A.; Sechtem, U. Epicardial Coronary Spasm in Women With Angina Pectoris and Unobstructed Coronary Arteries Is Linked With a Positive Family History: An Observational Study. Clin. Ther. 2018, 40, 1584–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Teragawa, H.; Oshita, C.; Ueda, T. History of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Heart Vessel. 2019, 34, 1631–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Suzuki, S.; Kaikita, K.; Yamamoto, E.; Jinnouchi, H.; Tsujita, K. Role of acetylcholine spasm provocation test as a pathophysiological assessment in nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc. Interv. Ther. 2021, 36, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Teragawa, H.; Oshita, C.; Orita, Y. Clinical significance of prolonged chest pain in vasospastic angina. World J. Cardiol. 2020, 12, 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Teragawa, H.; Oshita, C.; Uchimura, Y. Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Multi-Vessel Coronary Spasm in Comparison with Those in Patients with Single-Vessel Coronary Spasm. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Teragawa, H.; Oshita, C.; Ueda, T. The Myocardial Bridge: Potential Influences on the Coronary Artery Vasculature. Clin. Med. Insights Cardiol. 2019, 13, 1179546819846493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Teragawa, H.; Oshita, C.; Uchimura, Y. The Impact of Myocardial Bridging on the Coronary Functional Test in Patients with Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Life 2022, 12, 1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Teragawa, H.; Fukuda, Y.; Matsuda, K.; Hirao, H.; Higashi, Y.; Yamagata, T.; Oshima, T.; Matsuura, H.; Chayama, K. Myocardial bridging increases the risk of coronary spasm. Clin. Cardiol. 2003, 26, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hokimoto, S.; Kaikita, K.; Yasuda, S.; Tsujita, K.; Ishihara, M.; Matoba, T.; Matsuzawa, Y.; Mitsutake, Y.; Mitani, Y.; Murohara, T.; et al. JCS/CVIT/JCC 2023 Guideline Focused Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Vasospastic Angina (Coronary Spastic Angina) and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction. Circ. J. 2023, 87, 879–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sato, K.; Kaikita, K.; Nakayama, N.; Horio, E.; Yoshimura, H.; Ono, T.; Ohba, K.; Tsujita, K.; Kojima, S.; Tayama, S.; et al. Coronary vasomotor response to intracoronary acetylcholine injection, clinical features, and long-term prognosis in 873 consecutive patients with coronary spasm: Analysis of a single-center study over 20 years. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2013, 2, e000227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Nishimiya, K.; Suda, A.; Fukui, K.; Hao, K.; Takahashi, J.; Matsumoto, Y.; Mitsuishi, K.; Watanabe, T.; Ohyama, K.; Sugisawa, J.; et al. Prognostic Links Between OCT-Delineated Coronary Morphologies and Coronary Functional Abnormalities in Patients With INOCA. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2021, 14, 606–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Teragawa, H.; Fukuda, Y.; Matsuda, K.; Higashi, Y.; Yamagata, T.; Matsuura, H.; Chayama, K. Effect of alcohol consumption on endothelial function in men with coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 2002, 165, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Matsuo, S.; Imai, E.; Horio, M.; Yasuda, Y.; Tomita, K.; Nitta, K.; Yamagata, K.; Tomino, Y.; Yokoyama, H.; Hishida, A.; et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2009, 53, 982–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Teragawa, H.; Oshita, C.; Uchimura, Y. Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Vasospastic Angina Subjected to the Spasm Provocation Test and the Unavoidable Use of Nitroglycerin. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Teragawa, H.; Oshita, C.; Uchimura, Y. Vasospastic angina in women: Clinical backgrounds and prognoses of patients younger than and older than 60 years. World J. Cardiol. 2023, 15, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Benjamin, E.J.; Blaha, M.J.; Chiuve, S.E.; Cushman, M.; Das, S.R.; Deo, R.; de Ferranti, S.D.; Floyd, J.; Fornage, M.; Gillespie, C.; et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017, 135, e146–e603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pohjola-Sintonen, S.; Rissanen, A.; Liskola, P.; Luomanmaki, K. Family history as a risk factor of coronary heart disease in patients under 60 years of age. Eur. Heart J. 1998, 19, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ishii, M.; Kaikita, K.; Sato, K.; Tanaka, T.; Sugamura, K.; Sakamoto, K.; Izumiya, Y.; Yamamoto, E.; Tsujita, K.; Yamamuro, M.; et al. Acetylcholine-Provoked Coronary Spasm at Site of Significant Organic Stenosis Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients With Coronary Vasospastic Angina. J. Am. Coll Cardiol. 2015, 66, 1105–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Yoshimura, M.; Yasue, H.; Nakayama, M.; Shimasaki, Y.; Sumida, H.; Sugiyama, S.; Kugiyama, K.; Ogawa, H.; Ogawa, Y.; Saito, Y.; et al. A missense Glu298Asp variant in the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene is associated with coronary spasm in the Japanese. Hum. Genet. 1998, 103, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yoshimura, M.; Nakayama, M.; Shimasaki, Y.; Ogawa, H.; Kugiyama, K.; Nakamura, S.; Ito, T.; Mizuno, Y.; Harada, E.; Yasue, H.; et al. A T-786-->C mutation in the 5’-flanking region of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene and coronary arterial vasomotility. Am. J. Cardiol. 2000, 85, 710–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mizuno, Y.; Harada, E.; Morita, S.; Kinoshita, K.; Hayashida, M.; Shono, M.; Morikawa, Y.; Murohara, T.; Nakayama, M.; Yoshimura, M.; et al. East asian variant of aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 is associated with coronary spastic angina: Possible roles of reactive aldehydes and implications of alcohol flushing syndrome. Circulation 2015, 131, 1665–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mizuno, Y.; Harada, E.; Kugimiya, F.; Shono, M.; Kusumegi, I.; Yoshimura, M.; Kinoshita, K.; Yasue, H. East Asians Variant Mitochondrial Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2 Genotype Exacerbates Nitrate Tolerance in Patients With Coronary Spastic Angina. Circ. J. 2020, 84, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Takagi, Y.; Takahashi, J.; Yasuda, S.; Miyata, S.; Tsunoda, R.; Ogata, Y.; Seki, A.; Sumiyoshi, T.; Matsui, M.; Goto, T.; et al. Prognostic stratification of patients with vasospastic angina: A comprehensive clinical risk score developed by the Japanese Coronary Spasm Association. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013, 62, 1144–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Pirozzolo, G.; Seitz, A.; Athanasiadis, A.; Bekeredjian, R.; Sechtem, U.; Ong, P. Microvascular spasm in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction without culprit lesion (MINOCA). Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2020, 109, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Teragawa, H.; Oshita, C.; Uchimura, Y.; Akazawa, R.; Orita, Y. Coronary Microvascular Vasodilatory Function: Related Clinical Features and Differences According to the Different Coronary Arteries and Types of Coronary Spasm. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 11, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kunadian, V.; Chieffo, A.; Camici, P.G.; Berry, C.; Escaned, J.; Maas, A.; Prescott, E.; Karam, N.; Appelman, Y.; Fraccaro, C.; et al. An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 3504–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Schachinger, V.; Britten, M.B.; Elsner, M.; Walter, D.H.; Scharrer, I.; Zeiher, A.M. A positive family history of premature coronary artery disease is associated with impaired endothelium-dependent coronary blood flow regulation. Circulation 1999, 100, 1502–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Berg, A.O.; Baird, M.A.; Botkin, J.R.; Driscoll, D.A.; Fishman, P.A.; Guarino, P.D.; Hiatt, R.A.; Jarvik, G.P.; Millon-Underwood, S.; Morgan, T.M.; et al. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Family History and Improving Health: 24–26 August 2009. NIH Consens. State Sci. Statements 2009, 26, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  48. Teragawa, H.; Oshita, C.; Ueda, T. Coronary spasm: It’s common, but it’s still unsolved. World J. Cardiol. 2018, 10, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hokimoto, S.; Mizuno, Y.; Sueta, D.; Morita, S.; Akasaka, T.; Tabata, N.; Harada, E.; Arima, Y.; Yamamuro, M.; Tanaka, T.; et al. High incidence of coronary spasm after percutaneous coronary interventions: Comparison between new generation drug-eluting stent and bare-metal stent. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015, 182, 171–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcdd 10 00249 g001 550
Figure 1. Study flowchart. CAD, coronary artery disease; CAG, coronary angioography; FH-CAD, family history of coronary artery disease; SPT, spasm provocation test; VSA, vasospastic angina.
Figure 1. Study flowchart. CAD, coronary artery disease; CAG, coronary angioography; FH-CAD, family history of coronary artery disease; SPT, spasm provocation test; VSA, vasospastic angina.
Jcdd 10 00249 g001
Jcdd 10 00249 g002 550
Figure 2. FH-CAD frequencies in the three groups. CAD, coronary artery disease; FH-CAD, family history of coronary artery disease; VSA, vasospastic angina.
Figure 2. FH-CAD frequencies in the three groups. CAD, coronary artery disease; FH-CAD, family history of coronary artery disease; VSA, vasospastic angina.
Jcdd 10 00249 g002
Jcdd 10 00249 g003 550
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curve for MACE-free survival during the follow-up period for the FH-CAD (+) and FH-CAD (−) groups. FH-CAD, family history of coronary artery disease; M, month; MACE, major adverse cardiac event.
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curve for MACE-free survival during the follow-up period for the FH-CAD (+) and FH-CAD (−) groups. FH-CAD, family history of coronary artery disease; M, month; MACE, major adverse cardiac event.
Jcdd 10 00249 g003
Table
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics among the three groups.
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics among the three groups.
Atherosclerotic CADVSANon-VSAp Value
No. 36222173
Age (years)69 ± 1167± 1166 ± 130.004
Male/Female270/92114/10724/49<0.001
Body mass index24.2 ± 4.724.2 ± 4.224.4 ± 3.80.933
Coronary risk factors (%)
Active smoker86 (24)47 (21)6 (8)0.012
Hypertension264 (73)158 (71)50 (68)0.731
Dyslipidaemia294 (81)138 (62)42 (58)<0.001
Diabetes mellitus159 (45)49 (22)15 (21)<0.001
CKD (%)188 (53)66 (30)25 (35)<0.001
LVEF on UCG (%)62 ± 1266 ± 968 ± 6<0.001
Numbers were expressed as the numbers (percentage) and values were expressed as the mean with standard deviation. CAD, coronary artery disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; No., number; UCG, ultrasonic echocardiography; VSA, vasospastic angina.
Table
Table 2. FH-CAD in the three groups.
Table 2. FH-CAD in the three groups.
Atherosclerotic CADVSANon-VSAp Value
FH-CAD (No., %)42 (362,12)42 (221, 19)14 (73, 19)0.029
Male patients (No., %)33 (270, 12)16 (114, 14)4 (24, 17)0.764
Female patients (No., %)9 (92, 10)26 (107, 24)10 (49, 20)0.027
Patients with FH-CAD
No.424214
Male/Female33/916/264/10<0.001
First-degree relative (%)31 (74)31 (74)10 (71)0.983
Only second-degree
relative (%)		11 (26)11 (26)4 (29)0.983
Non-pharmacological
therapy for CAD (%)		24 (52)12 (29)4 (29)0.017
Probable sudden
cardiac death (%)		7 (17)11 (26)1 (7)0.248
Numbers were expressed as the numbers (percentage). CAD, coronary artery disease; FH-CAD, family history of coronary artery disease; No., number; VSA, vasospastic angina.
Table
Table 3. Clinical characteristics in VSA patients with/without FH-CAD.
Table 3. Clinical characteristics in VSA patients with/without FH-CAD.
FH-CAD (−) VSA GroupFH-CAD (+) VSA Groupp Value
No. (%)179 (81)42 (19)
Age (years)68 ± 1165 ± 120.178
Male/Female98/8116/260.052
Body mass index22.4 ± 4.124.2 ± 4.50.978
Coronary risk factors (%)
Active smoker39 (22)8 (19)0.696
Hypertension128 (72)30 (31)0.992
Dyslipidaemia112 (63)26 (62)0.936
Diabetes mellitus40 (22)9 (21)0.898
Alcoholic drinker (%)73 (41)11 (26)0.080
CKD (%)51 (28)15 (36)0.357
LVEF on UCG (%)66 ± 1068 ± 60.364
Numbers were expressed as the numbers (percentage) and values were expressed as the mean with standard deviation. CKD, chronic kidney disease; FH-CAD, family history of coronary artery disease; LVEF, Left ventricular ejection fraction; No., number; UCG, echocardiography; VSA, vasospastic angina.
Table
Table 4. The results of brachial ultrasonography and VSA-related parameters in VSA patients with/without FH-CAD.
Table 4. The results of brachial ultrasonography and VSA-related parameters in VSA patients with/without FH-CAD.
FH-CAD (−)
VSA Group		FH-CAD (+) VSA Groupp Value
Brachial ultrasonography
No.15240
Brachial artery diameter
at baseline (mm)		3.9 ± 0.63.7 ± 0.70.073
FMD (%)3.9 ± 3.13.4 ± 3.00.384
NID (%)14.0 ± 6.016.7 ± 8.40.023
VSA-related symptoms
At rest/on exercise/both146/18/1534/6/20.554
Estimated diseased period (M)6 (2, 20)5 (2, 36)0.518
No. of anginal attack/M4 (2, 10)5 (2, 10)0.321
VA (%)6 (4)0 (0)0.229
CAG
Atherosclerosis (%)109 (61)23 (55)0.476
MB (%)24 (13)8 (14)0.350
SPT
L-ACh-induced spasms (%)43 (24)12 (29)0.539
TOC (%)15 (8)5 (12)0.474
Focal spasms (%)51 (28)14 (33)0.533
MVS (No, %)98 (152, 64)28 (38, 74)0.283
ST elevation during SPT (%)29 (16)5 (12)0.487
Unavoidable use of NTG (%)50 (32)11 (27)0.551
Follow-up
Follow-up period (M)89 (38, 113)87 (55, 108)0.843
No. of anginal attack/M 0 (0, 1)
(No. = 135)		0 (0, 1)
(No. = 35)		0.864
No. coronary vasodilators1.4 ± 0.9
(No. = 135)		1.6 ± 1.1
(No. = 35)		0.266
Cardiac death (%)1 (0.6)0 (0)0.622
Readmission for heart (%)26 (15)7 (15)0.726
Numbers were expressed as the numbers (percentage), and values were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). CAD, coronary artery disease; CAG, coronary angiography; FH-CAD, family history of coronary artery disease; FMD, flow-mediated dilation; L-ACh, low dose of acetylcholine; M, months; MB, myocardial bridging; MVS, multivessel spasm; NID, nitroglycerin-induced dilation; No., number; TOC, total occlusion due to spasms; SPT, spasm provocation test; VA, variant angina; VSA, vasospastic angina.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Teragawa, H.; Uchimura, Y.; Oshita, C.; Hashimoto, Y.; Nomura, S. Frequency and Clinical Impact of Family History of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Vasospastic Angina. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10, 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10060249

AMA Style

Teragawa H, Uchimura Y, Oshita C, Hashimoto Y, Nomura S. Frequency and Clinical Impact of Family History of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Vasospastic Angina. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2023; 10(6):249. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10060249

Chicago/Turabian Style

Teragawa, Hiroki, Yuko Uchimura, Chikage Oshita, Yu Hashimoto, and Shuichi Nomura. 2023. "Frequency and Clinical Impact of Family History of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Vasospastic Angina" Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 10, no. 6: 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10060249

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop