Exploration of the Hungarian Version of Test Your Memory in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Correlational Study of a Convenience Sample of Middle-Aged and Older Adults
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants and Location
2.2. The Study Instrument
2.3. Aim of the Study
2.4. Statistics
2.5. Ethical Approval
3. Results
3.1. Descriptive Data
3.2. Results of the Correlation of Subtest and Total Test Scores with Demographic Characteristics
3.3. Results of Lower-Than-Expected Scores on Each Subtest in Different Age Groups
4. Discussion
5. Strengths and Limitations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Leifer, B.P. Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease: Clinical and Economic Benefits. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2003, 51, S281–S288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gaugler, J.E.; Yu, F.; Krichbaum, K.; Wyman, J.F. Predictors of nursing home admission for persons with dementia. Med. Care 2009, 47, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mittelman, M.S.; Ferris, S.H.; Shulman, E.; Steinberg, G.; Levin, B. A family intervention to delay nursing home placement of patients with Alzheimer disease. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1996, 276, 1725–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brodaty, H.; Green, A.; Koschera, A. Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for caregivers of people with dementia. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2003, 51, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alzheimer’s Disease International. Available online: https://www.alzint.org (accessed on 31 January 2023).
- Hu, C.; Yu, D.; Sun, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, L.; Qin, H. The prevalence and progression of mild cognitive impairment among clinic and community populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2017, 29, 1595–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luck, T.; Then, F.S.; Schroeter, M.L.; Witte, V.; Engel, C.; Loeffler, M.; Thiery, J.; Villringer, A.; Riedel-Heller, S.G. Prevalence of DSM-5 Mild Neurocognitive Disorder in Dementia-Free Older Adults: Results of the Population-Based LIFE-Adult-Study. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2017, 25, 328–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petersen, R.C.; Caracciolo, B.; Brayne, C.; Gauthier, S.; Jelic, V.; Fratiglioni, L. Mild cognitive impairment: A concept in evolution. J. Intern. Med. 2014, 275, 214–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prince, M.; Bryce, R.; Albanese, E.; Wimo, A.; Ribeiro, W.; Ferri, C.P. The global prevalence of dementia: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2013, 9, 63–75.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiest, K.M.; Roberts, J.I.; Maxwell, C.J.; Hogan, D.B.; Smith, E.E.; Frolkis, A.; Cohen, A.; Kirk, A.; Pearson, D.; Pringsheim, T.; et al. The Prevalence and Incidence of Dementia Due to Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2016, 43, S51–S82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papp, E.; Pákáski, M.; Drótos, G.; Kálmán, J. Az Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale kognitiv alskala (ADAS-Cog) validalasa enyhe kognitiv zavarban [Validation of the Hungarian version of Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) in patients with mild cognitive impairment]. Psychiatr. Hung. 2012, 27, 426–434. [Google Scholar]
- Volosin, M.; Janacsek, K.; Németh, D. A Montreal Kognitiv Felmérés (MoCA) magyar nyelvű adaptálása egészséges, enyhe kognitiv zavarban és demenciában szenvedő idős személyek körében [Hungarian version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for screening mild cognitive impairment]. Psychiatr. Hung. 2013, 28, 370–392. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Drótos, G.; Pákáski, M.; Papp, E.; Kálmán, J. Pszeudo-e a demencia? Az ADAS-Cog validálása Magyarországon [Is it pseudo-dementia? The validation of the Adas-Cog questionnaire in Hungary]. Psychiatr. Hung. 2012, 27, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Dudas, R.B.; Berrios, G.E.; Hodges, J.R. The Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination (ACE) in the differential diagnosis of early dementias versus affective disorder. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2005, 13, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaszás, B.; Fekete, J. Validation of the Hungarian Version of Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination for Detecting Major and Mild Neurocognitive Disorders. Int. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2020, 14, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartosh, O. Social protection of people with dementia in Hungary. Soc. Work. Educ. 2018, 5, 6–18. [Google Scholar]
- Alapellátásfejlesztési Igazgatóság—Praxisközösségek Működését Segítő Szakmai Anyago. Available online: https://alapellatas.okfo.gov.hu/praxiskozossegek-mukodeset-segito-szakmai-anyagok/ (accessed on 31 January 2023).
- Balogh, R.; Imre, N.; Papp, E.; Kovács, I.; Heim, S.; Karádi, K.; Hajnal, F.; Pákáski, M.; Kálmán, J. Dementia in Hungary: General practitioners’ routines and perspectives regarding early recognition. Eur. J. Gen. Pract. 2020, 26, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heim, S.; Busa, C.; Pozsgai, É.; Csikós, Á.; Papp, E.; Pákáski, M.; Kálmán, J.; Hajnal, F.; Karádi, K. Hungarian general practitioners’ attitude and the role of education in dementia care. Prim. Health Care Res. Dev. 2019, 20, e92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Egészségügyi Szakmai Kollégium Tagozatai és Tanácsai—Szakmai Irányelvek. Available online: https://kollegium.aeek.hu/Iranyelvek/Index (accessed on 31 January 2023).
- Brown, J.; Pengas, G.; Dawson, K.; Brown, L.A.; Clatworthy, P. Self administered cognitive screening test (TYM) for detection of Alzheimer’s disease: Cross sectional study. BMJ 2009, 338, b2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kolozsvári, L.R.; Kovács, Z.G.; Szőllősi, G.J.; Harsányi, S.; Frecska, E.; Égerházi, A. Validation of the Hungarian version of the Test Your Memory. Ideggyogy. Sz. 2017, 70, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garbóczy, S.; Magócs, É.; Szőllősi, G.J.; Harsányi, S.; Égerházi, A.; Kolozsvári, L.R. The use of the Hungarian Test Your Memory (TYM-HUN), MMSE, and ADAS-Cog tests for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in a Hungarian population: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 2020, 20, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ersek, K.; Kárpáti, K.; Kovács, T.; Csillik, G.; Gulácsi, A.L.; Gulácsi, L. A dementia epidemiológiája magyarországon [Epidemiology of dementia in Hungary]. Ideggyogy. Sz. 2010, 63, 175–182. [Google Scholar]
- Balázs, N.; Ajtay, A.; Oberfrank, F.; Bereczki, D.; Kovács, T. Dementia epidemiology in Hungary based on data from neurological and psychiatric specialty services. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovács, G.G.; Kovári, V.; Nagy, Z. Dementiával járó kórképek gyakorisága az Országos Pszichiátriai és Neurológiai Intézet hároméves neuropatológiai anyagában [Frequency of different forms of dementia at the Department of Neuropathology of the Hungarian National Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology during a 3-year period]. Ideggyogy. Sz. 2008, 61, 24–32. [Google Scholar]
- Imre, N.; Balogh, R.; Papp, E.; Kovács, I.; Heim, S.; Karádi, K.; Hajnal, F.; Kálmán, J.; Pákáski, M. Knowledge of general practitioners on dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A cross-sectional, questionnaire study from Hungary. Educ. Gerontol. 2019, 45, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubois, B.; Albert, M.L. Amnestic MCI or prodromal Alzheimer’s disease? Lancet Neurol. 2004, 3, 246–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grundman, M.; Petersen, R.C.; Ferris, S.H.; Thomas, R.G.; Aisen, P.S.; Bennett, D.A.; Foster, N.L.; Jack, C.R., Jr.; Galasko, D.R.; Doody, R.; et al. Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study. Mild cognitive impairment can be distinguished from Alzheimer disease and normal aging for clinical trials. Arch. Neurol. 2004, 61, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsoi, K.K.; Chan, J.Y.; Hirai, H.W.; Wong, A.; Mok, V.C.; Lam, L.C.; Kwok, T.C.; Wong, S.Y. Recall Tests Are Effective to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 108 Diagnostic Studies. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2017, 18, 807.e17–807.e29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, A.J.; Shiri-Feshki, M. Rate of progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia--meta-analysis of 41 robust inception cohort studies. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2009, 119, 252–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruscoli, M.; Lovestone, S. Is MCI really just early dementia? A systematic review of conversion studies. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2004, 16, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer, P.; Jungwirth, S.; Zehetmayer, S.; Weissgram, S.; Hoenigschnabl, S.; Gelpi, E.; Krampla, W.; Tragl, K.H. Conversion from subtypes of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer dementia. Neurology 2007, 68, 288–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Központi Statisztikai Hivatal—Magyarország Népességének Száma Nemek és életkor Szerint. Available online: https://www.ksh.hu/interaktiv/korfak/orszag.html (accessed on 31 January 2023).
- Zekry, D.; Herrmann, F.R.; Grandjean, R.; Vitale, A.M.; De Pinho, M.F.; Michel, J.P.; Gold, G.; Krause, K.H. Does dementia predict adverse hospitalization outcomes? A prospective study in aged inpatients. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2009, 24, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reyniers, T.; Deliens, L.; Pasman, H.R.; Morin, L.; Addington-Hall, J.; Frova, L.; Cardenas-Turanzas, M.; Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.; Naylor, W.; Ruiz-Ramos, M.; et al. International variation in place of death of older people who died from dementia in 14 European and non-European countries. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2015, 16, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takacs, R.; Ungvari, G.S.; Gazdag, G. Reasons for acute psychiatric admission of patients with dementia. Neuropsychopharmacol. Hung. 2015, 17, 141–145. [Google Scholar]
- Phelan, E.A.; Borson, S.; Grothaus, L.; Balch, S.; Larson, E.B. Association of incident dementia with hospitalizations. JAMA 2012, 307, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Érsek, K.; Kovács, T.; Wimo, A.; Kárpati, K.; Brodszky, V.; Péntek, M.; Jönsson, L.; Gustavsson, A.; McDaid, D.; Kenigsberg, P.A.; et al. Costs of dementia in Hungary. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2010, 14, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teri, L. Training families to provide care: Effects on people with dementia. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 1999, 14, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabins, P.V.; Mace, N.L.; Lucas, M.J. The impact of dementia on the family. JAMA 1982, 248, 333–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caamaño-Isorna, F.; Corral, M.; Montes-Martínez, A.; Takkouche, B. Education and dementia: A meta-analytic study. Neuroepidem 2006, 26, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharp, E.S.; Gatz, M. Relationship between education and dementia: An updated systematic review. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 2011, 25, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dufouil, C.; Pereira, E.; Chêne, G.; Glymour, M.M.; Alpérovitch, A.; Saubusse, E.; Risse-Fleury, M.; Heuls, B.; Salord, J.C.; Brieu, M.A.; et al. Older age at retirement is associated with decreased risk of dementia. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 29, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cordell, C.B.; Borson, S.; Boustani, M.; Chodosh, J.; Reuben, D.; Verghese, J.; Thies, W.; Fried, L.B.; Medicare Detection of Cognitive Impairment Workgroup. Alzheimer’s Association recommendations for operationalizing the detection of cognitive impairment during the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit in a primary care setting. Alzheimers Dement. 2013, 9, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Screening for Dementia—Recommendations and Rationale—U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Available online: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/T-DyWdyD67ktDMJGDp3jpm (accessed on 31 January 2023).
- Van Mierlo, L.D.; Wouters, H.; Sikkes, S.A.; Van der Flier, W.M.; Prins, N.D.; Bremer, J.A.; Koene, T.; Van Hout, H.P. Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia with Automated, Anonymous Online and Telephone Cognitive Self-Tests. J. Alzheimers. Dis. 2017, 56, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Z.; Zhang, D.; Lee, A.T.C.; Sit, R.W.S.; Wong, C.; Lee, E.K.P.; Yip, B.H.K.; Tiu, J.Y.S.; Lam, L.C.W.; Wong, S.Y.S. A pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial on combining mind-body physical exercise, cognitive training, and nurse-led risk factor modification to reduce cognitive decline among older adults with mild cognitive impairment in primary care. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sabbagh, M.N.; Perez, A.; Holland, T.M.; Boustani, M.; Peabody, S.R.; Yaffe, K.; Bruno, M.; Paulsen, R.; O’Brien, K.; Wahid, N.; et al. Primary prevention recommendations to reduce the risk of cognitive decline. Alzheimers Dement. 2022, 18, 1569–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woods, R.T.; Moniz-Cook, E.; Iliffe, S.; Campion, P.; Vernooij-Dassen, M.; Zanetti, O.; Franco, M.; INTERDEM (Early Detection and Intervention in Dementia) Group. Dementia: Issues in early recognition and intervention in primary care. J. R. Soc. Med. 2003, 96, 320–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
N | Missing | |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Female | 223 | 0 |
Male | 145 | |
Age groups | ||
≤65 | 116 | 0 |
66–75 | 147 | |
≥76 | 105 | |
Education | ||
Primary education or less | 103 | 1 |
Secondary education | 153 | |
Bachelor’s or higher | 111 | |
Marital status | ||
In a relationship | 225 | 1 |
Divorced | 55 | |
Single | 24 | |
Widowed | 63 | |
Number of persons living in the same household | ||
0 | 73 | 118 |
1 | 111 | |
2 | 40 | |
3 | 12 | |
4 or more | 14 | |
Occupation | ||
Active worker | 42 | 113 |
Retired | 213 | |
Type of occupation | ||
Passive mental work | 63 | 135 |
Active mental work | 82 | |
Physical work | 88 | |
Doing sports for 3 × 45 min/week | ||
Yes | 85 | 117 |
No | 166 | |
Depressed mood | ||
Yes | 51 | 5 |
No | 312 | |
Self-detected memory problems | ||
Yes | 137 | 114 |
No | 117 | |
Memory problems detected by others | ||
Yes | 45 | 112 |
No | 211 | |
Number of children | ||
0 | 5 | 256 |
1 | 26 | |
2 | 60 | |
3 or more | 21 |
TYM-HUN Scores | Number of Cases | Percentage |
---|---|---|
50–45 | 248 | 67.4 |
44–36 | 93 | 25.3 |
35 or less | 27 | 7.3 |
Total | 368 | 100 |
Demographic Factors | Orientation | Copying | Facts | Sums | Fluencies | Similarities | Naming | Visuospatial Skills | Clock Drawing | Recall | Help | Total | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | ** | * | ** | * | ** | * | ** | * | ** | * | ** | * | ** | * | ** | * | ** | * | ** | * | ** | * | ** | |
Gender | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Female | 10 | 9.65 | 2 | 1.83 | 3 | 2.63 | 4 | 3.61 | 4 | 3.68 | 4 | 6.62 | 5 | 4.8 | 3 | 2.46 | 4 | 3.35 | 6 | 4.78 | 5 | 4.64 | 47 | 45.04 |
Male | 10 | 10 | 2 | 1.84 | 3 | 2.7 | 4 | 3.48 | 4 | 3.69 | 4 | 3.55 | 5 | 4.7 | 3 | 2.57 | 4 | 3.36 | 5 | 4.36 | 5 | 4.61 | 46 | 44.42 |
p-value | 0.321 | 0.976 | 0.105 | 0.137 | 0.772 | 0.478 | 0.131 | 0.450 | 0.682 | 0.106 | 0.653 | 0.120 | ||||||||||||
Education | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Primary education or less | 10 | 9.48 | 2 | 1.68 | 3 | 2.45 | 4 | 3.27 | 4 | 3.5 | 4 | 3.28 | 5 | 4.67 | 3 | 2.21 | 4 | 3.16 | 5 | 3.79 | 5 | 4.39 | 44 | 41.87 |
Secondary education | 10 | 9.71 | 2 | 1.91 | 3 | 2.66 | 4 | 3.64 | 4 | 3.71 | 4 | 3.71 | 5 | 4.85 | 3 | 2.54 | 4 | 3.47 | 6 | 4.9 | 5 | 4.69 | 47 | 45.77 |
Bachelor’s or higher | 10 | 9.66 | 2 | 1.87 | 3 | 2.86 | 4 | 3.71 | 4 | 3.81 | 4 | 3.71 | 5 | 4.72 | 3 | 2.68 | 4 | 3.38 | 6 | 4.98 | 5 | 4.77 | 47 | 46.14 |
p-value | 0.116 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.202 | 0.002 | 0.150 | 0.001 | 0.031 | 0.000 | 0.013 | 0.000 | ||||||||||||
Marital status | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
In a relationship | 10 | 9.59 | 2 | 1.86 | 3 | 2.71 | 4 | 3.52 | 4 | 3.65 | 4 | 3.61 | 5 | 4.78 | 3 | 2.56 | 4 | 2.42 | 6 | 4.75 | 5 | 4.7 | 47 | 45.14 |
Divorced | 10 | 9.71 | 2 | 1.85 | 3 | 2.55 | 4 | 3.64 | 4 | 3.71 | 4 | 3.58 | 5 | 4.78 | 3 | 2.4 | 4 | 3.4 | 6 | 4.67 | 5 | 4.6 | 47 | 44.89 |
Single | 10 | 9.83 | 2 | 1.79 | 3 | 2.75 | 4 | 3.71 | 4 | 3.71 | 4 | 3.58 | 5 | 4.5 | 3 | 2.25 | 3 | 2.88 | 5 | 4.13 | 5 | 4.58 | 46 | 43.71 |
Widowed | 10 | 9.65 | 2 | 1.78 | 3 | 2.59 | 4 | 3.6 | 4 | 3.75 | 4 | 3.54 | 5 | 4.78 | 3 | 2.43 | 4 | 3.25 | 5 | 4.29 | 5 | 4.44 | 45 | 44.1 |
p-value | 0.289 | 0.512 | 0.132 | 0.896 | 0.657 | 0.820 | 0.071 | 0.242 | 0.054 | 0.241 | 0.080 | 0.108 | ||||||||||||
Occupation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Active worker | 10 | 9.64 | 2 | 1.93 | 3 | 2.76 | 4 | 3.67 | 4 | 3.79 | 4 | 3.83 | 5 | 4.76 | 3 | 2.88 | 4 | 3.67 | 6 | 5.38 | 5 | 4.9 | 48,5 | 47.21 |
Retired | 10 | 9.57 | 2 | 1.77 | 3 | 2.58 | 4 | 3.49 | 4 | 3.67 | 4 | 3.6 | 5 | 4.69 | 3 | 2.38 | 4 | 3.23 | 5 | 4.49 | 5 | 4.5 | 46 | 43.97 |
p-value | 0.808 | 0.095 | 0.110 | 0.302 | 0.711 | 0.019 | 0.721 | 0.003 | 0.018 | 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.000 | ||||||||||||
Type of occupation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Passive mental work | 10 | 9.63 | 2 | 1.87 | 3 | 2.71 | 4 | 3.78 | 4 | 3.7 | 4 | 3.75 | 5 | 4.84 | 3 | 2.6 | 4 | 3.33 | 6 | 5.03 | 5 | 4.52 | 47 | 45.78 |
Active mental work | 10 | 9.6 | 2 | 1.84 | 3 | 2.66 | 4 | 3.62 | 4 | 3.79 | 4 | 3.74 | 5 | 4.71 | 3 | 2.56 | 4 | 3.41 | 6 | 4.96 | 5 | 4.76 | 47 | 45.66 |
Physical work | 10 | 9.53 | 2 | 1.69 | 3 | 2.51 | 4 | 3.31 | 4 | 3.52 | 4 | 3.44 | 5 | 4.59 | 3 | 2.31 | 4 | 3.19 | 5 | 4.05 | 5 | 4.49 | 45 | 42.64 |
p-value | 0.571 | 0.073 | 0.084 | 0.005 | 0.200 | 0.081 | 0.496 | 0.165 | 0.350 | 0.006 | 0.394 | 0.106 | ||||||||||||
Doing sports for 3 × 45 min/week | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | 10 | 9.66 | 2 | 1.82 | 3 | 2.58 | 4 | 3.35 | 4 | 3.71 | 4 | 3.67 | 5 | 4.62 | 3 | 2.48 | 4 | 3.27 | 6 | 4.76 | 5 | 4.72 | 47 | 44.65 |
No | 10 | 9.55 | 2 | 1.8 | 3 | 2.65 | 4 | 3.61 | 4 | 3.67 | 4 | 3.61 | 5 | 4.74 | 3 | 2.46 | 4 | 3.3 | 5 | 4.58 | 5 | 4.51 | 47 | 44.48 |
p-value | 0.316 | 0.571 | 0.278 | 0.039 | 0.980 | 0.871 | 0.391 | 0.785 | 0.548 | 0.253 | 0.126 | 0.495 | ||||||||||||
Depressed mood | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | 10 | 9.27 | 2 | 1.65 | 3 | 2.53 | 4 | 3.41 | 4 | 3.59 | 4 | 3.61 | 5 | 4.76 | 3 | 2.24 | 4 | 3.31 | 5 | 4.33 | 5 | 4.49 | 45 | 43.2 |
No | 10 | 9.71 | 2 | 1.88 | 3 | 2.68 | 4 | 3.58 | 4 | 3.7 | 4 | 3.58 | 5 | 4.76 | 3 | 2.55 | 4 | 3.36 | 6 | 4.67 | 5 | 4.65 | 47 | 45.11 |
p-value | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.127 | 0.119 | 0.383 | 0.483 | 0.737 | 0.045 | 0.410 | 0.026 | 0.408 | 0.038 | ||||||||||||
Self-detected memory problems | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | 10 | 9.51 | 2 | 1.79 | 3 | 2.57 | 4 | 3.55 | 4 | 3.65 | 4 | 3.62 | 5 | 4.63 | 3 | 2.37 | 4 | 3.34 | 5 | 4.47 | 5 | 4.52 | 46 | 44.01 |
No | 10 | 9.68 | 2 | 1.82 | 3 | 2.67 | 4 | 3.49 | 4 | 3.74 | 4 | 3.66 | 5 | 4.79 | 3 | 2.57 | 4 | 3.26 | 6 | 4.87 | 5 | 4.62 | 47 | 45.17 |
p-value | 0.144 | 0.424 | 0.344 | 0.598 | 0.433 | 0.514 | 0.332 | 0.186 | 0.914 | 0.043 | 0.902 | 0.022 | ||||||||||||
Memory problems detected by others | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | 10 | 9.42 | 2 | 1.6 | 3 | 2.47 | 4 | 3.64 | 4 | 3.47 | 4 | 3.71 | 5 | 4.47 | 3 | 2.24 | 4 | 3.16 | 5 | 3.53 | 5 | 4.31 | 45 | 42.02 |
No | 10 | 9.62 | 2 | 1.84 | 3 | 2.64 | 4 | 3.5 | 4 | 3.73 | 4 | 3.62 | 5 | 4.75 | 3 | 2.51 | 4 | 3.33 | 6 | 4.88 | 5 | 4.63 | 47 | 45.05 |
p-value | 0.805 | 0.060 | 0.150 | 0.470 | 0.037 | 0.546 | 0.103 | 0.314 | 0.407 | <0.001 | 0.143 | 0.017 |
Demographic Factors | Orientation | Copying | Facts | Sums | Fluencies | Similarities | Naming | Visuospatial Skills | Clock Drawing | Recall | Help | Total Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | −0.089 | −0.221 ** | −0.133 * | −0.116 * | −0.530 | −0.161 * | −0.148 * | −0.260 ** | −0.268 ** | −0.269 ** | −0.322 ** | −0.401 ** |
Number of children | 0.030 | 0.008 | 0.017 | −0.121 | 0.033 | −0.165 | 0.175 | 0.092 | −0.035 | 0.092 | −0.145 | 0.012 |
Number of persons in the same household | −0.066 | 0.034 | −0.030 | 0.047 | −0.022 | −0.005 | −0.079 | 0.071 | 0.048 | 0.128 * | 0.166 * | 0.121 |
Subtest | Age (Years) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Orientation | ≤65 | 66–75 | 76≤ | Total | Chi-Square Test | |
10 points | Count | 90 | 111 | 72 | 273 | χ2(2) = 2.563; p = 0.278 |
Expected Count | 86.1 | 109.1 | 77.9 | |||
Less than 10 points | Count | 26 | 36 | 33 | 95 | |
Expected Count | 29.9 | 37.9 | 27.1 | |||
Total | 116 | 147 | 105 | 368 | ||
Copying | Age (years) | |||||
≤65 | 66–75 | 76≤ | Total | Fisher’s Exact Test | ||
2 points | Count | 112 | 132 | 84 | 328 | p(2) = 15.687; p < 0.001 |
Expected Count | 103.4 | 131 | 93.6 | |||
Less than 2 points | Count | 4 | 15 | 21 | 40 | |
Expected Count | 12.6 | 16 | 11.4 | |||
Total | 116 | 147 | 105 | 368 | ||
Facts | Age (years) | |||||
≤65 | 66–75 | 76≤ | Total | Chi-Square Test | ||
3 points | Count | 89 | 103 | 66 | 258 | χ2(2) = 5.057; p = 0.080 |
Expected Count | 81.3 | 103.1 | 73.6 | |||
Less than 3 points | Count | 27 | 44 | 39 | 110 | |
Expected Count | 34.7 | 43.9 | 31.4 | |||
Total | 116 | 147 | 105 | 368 | ||
Sums | Age (years) | |||||
≤65 | 66–75 | 76≤ | Total | Chi-Square Test | ||
4 points | Count | 91 | 100 | 68 | 259 | χ2(2) = 5.602; p = 0.061 |
Expected Count | 81.6 | 103.5 | 73.9 | |||
Less than 4 points | Count | 25 | 47 | 37 | 109 | |
Expected Count | 34.4 | 43.5 | 31.1 | |||
Total | 116 | 147 | 105 | 368 | ||
Fluencies | Age (years) | |||||
≤65 | 66–75 | 76≤ | Total | Chi-Square Test | ||
4 points | Count | 93 | 117 | 81 | 291 | χ2(2) = 0.345; p = 0.842 |
Expected Count | 91.7 | 116.2 | 83 | |||
Less than 4 points | Count | 23 | 30 | 24 | 77 | |
Expected Count | 24.3 | 30.8 | 22 | |||
Total | 116 | 147 | 105 | 368 | ||
Similarities | Age (years) | |||||
≤65 | 66–75 | 76≤ | Total | Chi-Square Test | ||
4 points | Count | 96 | 114 | 65 | 275 | χ2(2) = 13.724; p = 0.001 |
Expected Count | 86.7 | 109.9 | 78.5 | |||
Less than 4 points | Count | 20 | 33 | 40 | 93 | |
Expected Count | 29.3 | 37.1 | 26.5 | |||
Total | 116 | 147 | 105 | 368 | ||
Naming | Age (years) | |||||
≤65 | 66–75 | 76≤ | Total | Chi-Square Test | ||
5 points | Count | 105 | 122 | 83 | 310 | χ2(2) = 5.747; p = 0.056 |
Expected Count | 97.7 | 123.8 | 88.5 | |||
Less than 5 points | Count | 11 | 25 | 22 | 58 | |
Expected Count | 18.3 | 23.2 | 16.5 | |||
Total | 116 | 147 | 105 | 368 | ||
Visuospatial Skills | Age (years) | |||||
≤65 | 66–75 | 76≤ | Total | Chi-Square Test | ||
3 points | Count | 104 | 113 | 64 | 281 | χ2(2) = 25.188; p < 0.001 |
Expected Count | 88.6 | 112.2 | 80.2 | |||
Less than 3 points | Count | 12 | 34 | 41 | 87 | |
Expected Count | 27.4 | 34.8 | 24.8 | |||
Total | 116 | 147 | 105 | 368 | ||
Clock Drawing | Age (years) | |||||
≤65 | 66–75 | 76≤ | Total | Chi-Square Test | ||
4 points | Count | 91 | 89 | 49 | 229 | χ2(2) = 23.979; p < 0.001 |
Expected Count | 72.2 | 91.5 | 65.3 | |||
Less than 4 points | Count | 25 | 58 | 56 | 139 | |
Expected Count | 43.8 | 55.5 | 39.7 | |||
Total | 116 | 147 | 105 | 368 | ||
Recall | Age (years) | |||||
≤65 | 66–75 | 76≤ | Total | Chi-Square Test | ||
6 points | Count | 74 | 74 | 39 | 187 | χ2(2) = 15.684; p < 0.001 |
Expected Count | 58.9 | 74.7 | 53.4 | |||
Less than 6 points | Count | 42 | 73 | 66 | 181 | |
Expected Count | 57.1 | 72.3 | 51.6 | |||
Total | 116 | 147 | 105 | 368 | ||
Help | Age (years) | |||||
≤65 | 66–75 | 76≤ | Total | Chi-Square Test | ||
5 points | Count | 108 | 116 | 63 | 287 | χ2(2) = 35.304; p < 0.001 |
Expected Count | 90.5 | 114.6 | 81.9 | |||
Less than 5 points | Count | 8 | 31 | 42 | 81 | |
Expected Count | 25.5 | 32.4 | 23.1 | |||
Total | 116 | 147 | 105 | 368 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Garbóczy, S.; Mohos, A.; Égerházi, A.; Szemán-Nagy, A.; Zsuffa, J.A.; Heim, S.; Rekenyi, V.; Kolozsvári, L.R. Exploration of the Hungarian Version of Test Your Memory in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Correlational Study of a Convenience Sample of Middle-Aged and Older Adults. Geriatrics 2024, 9, 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics9030074
Garbóczy S, Mohos A, Égerházi A, Szemán-Nagy A, Zsuffa JA, Heim S, Rekenyi V, Kolozsvári LR. Exploration of the Hungarian Version of Test Your Memory in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Correlational Study of a Convenience Sample of Middle-Aged and Older Adults. Geriatrics. 2024; 9(3):74. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics9030074
Chicago/Turabian StyleGarbóczy, Szabolcs, András Mohos, Anikó Égerházi, Anita Szemán-Nagy, János András Zsuffa, Szilvia Heim, Viktor Rekenyi, and László Róbert Kolozsvári. 2024. "Exploration of the Hungarian Version of Test Your Memory in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Correlational Study of a Convenience Sample of Middle-Aged and Older Adults" Geriatrics 9, no. 3: 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics9030074
APA StyleGarbóczy, S., Mohos, A., Égerházi, A., Szemán-Nagy, A., Zsuffa, J. A., Heim, S., Rekenyi, V., & Kolozsvári, L. R. (2024). Exploration of the Hungarian Version of Test Your Memory in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Correlational Study of a Convenience Sample of Middle-Aged and Older Adults. Geriatrics, 9(3), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics9030074