Next Article in Journal
Influence of Sociodemographic, Health-Related, and Behavioral Factors on Food Guidelines Compliance in Older Adults: A Hierarchical Approach from the Chilean National Health Survey 2016–17 Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Increased Knowledge of Adult-Onset Dystonia Amongst Medical Students via Brief Video Education: A Systematic Review and Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
Efficacy Comparison Study of Human Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) between Heberprot-P® and Easyef® in Adult Zebrafish and Embryo under Presence or Absence Combination of Diabetic Condition and Hyperlipidemia to Mimic Elderly Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aromatherapy Massage vs. Foot Reflexology on the Severity of Restless Legs Syndrome in Female Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis
 
 
Review

A Narrative Review of Specialist Parkinson’s Nurses: Evolution, Evidence and Expectation

1
Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1NU, UK
2
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Princess of Wales Hospital, Coity Road, Bridgend CF31 1RQ, UK
3
Older People’s Unit, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Tino Prell
Geriatrics 2022, 7(2), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics7020046
Received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 5 April 2022 / Accepted: 5 April 2022 / Published: 7 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Movement Disorders in Older Adults)
Extended nursing roles have existed since the 1940s. The first specialist nurse for Parkinson’s disease, a complex neurodegenerative disease, was appointed in the United Kingdom (UK) in 1989. A review was undertaken using MEDLINE and Cumulative Index to the Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), relating to the role and evidence for Parkinson’s disease nurse specialists (PDNSs). PDNSs fulfil many roles. Trials of their effectiveness have failed to show a positive benefit on health outcomes, but their input appears to improve the wellbeing of people with Parkinson’s. Now embedded in the UK Parkinson’s multidisciplinary team, this care model has since been adopted widely, including successful dissemination of training to countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. The lack of evidence to support the benefit of PDNSs may reflect an insufficient duration and intensity of the intervention, the outcome measures selected or the need to combine PDNS input with other evidence-based interventions. Whilst the current evidence base for their effectiveness is limited, their input appears to improve subjective patient wellbeing and they are considered a vital resource in management. Better evidence in the future will support the development of these roles and may facilitate the application of specialist nurses to other disease areas. View Full-Text
Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; nursing; effectiveness of care; caregivers Parkinson’s disease; nursing; effectiveness of care; caregivers
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Tenison, E.; James, A.; Ebenezer, L.; Henderson, E.J. A Narrative Review of Specialist Parkinson’s Nurses: Evolution, Evidence and Expectation. Geriatrics 2022, 7, 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics7020046

AMA Style

Tenison E, James A, Ebenezer L, Henderson EJ. A Narrative Review of Specialist Parkinson’s Nurses: Evolution, Evidence and Expectation. Geriatrics. 2022; 7(2):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics7020046

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tenison, Emma, Alice James, Louise Ebenezer, and Emily J. Henderson. 2022. "A Narrative Review of Specialist Parkinson’s Nurses: Evolution, Evidence and Expectation" Geriatrics 7, no. 2: 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics7020046

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop