Hemogram Findings in Cats from an Area Endemic for Leishmania infantum and Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Infections
by
, , , and
Marisa Masucci
1,*
,
Giulia Donato
1,*,
Maria Flaminia Persichetti
1,
Vito Priolo
1,
Germano Castelli
2,
Federica Bruno
2 and
Maria Grazia Pennisi
1 1
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, Italy
2
National Reference Center for Leishmaniasis (C.Re.Na.L.), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia, 90129 Palermo, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(9), 508; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9090508
Submission received: 22 August 2022
/
Revised: 8 September 2022
/
Accepted: 14 September 2022
/
Published: 16 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Food Safety and Zoonosis)
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Some cats positive for Leishmania infantum (Li) show clinical signs and clinicopathological changes, including hemogram abnormalities. However, co-infections or co-morbidities are often detected in cats with leishmaniosis, and they can have a role in the clinical abnormalities observed. In feline Leishmania infantum infections and in clinical cases of feline leishmaniosis, a significant association with feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) has been detected, but the role of this co-infection is controversial. The aims of this study were to retrospectively evaluate hemogram changes in cats from areas endemic for Leishmania infantum and feline immunodeficiency virus infections (Sicily and Calabria regions, Southern Italy) and to analyze the role of both pathogens in the abnormalities detected. A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out on 496 cats. Hematological changes in cats positive for Leishmania infantum were found, particularly abnormalities compatible with chronic inflammation including moderate anemia, monocytosis, and morphologically activated monocytes. Moreover, some abnormalities, such as thrombocytosis, seem to arise when cats are co-infected with FIV. Feline leishmaniosis should be considered when some hemogram abnormalities compatible with chronic inflammation are detected.
Abstract
In feline Leishmania infantum (Li) infection and in clinical cases of feline leishmaniosis, co-infection with feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) has been reported. However, the role of the retroviral co-infection in the impairment of feline clinical health is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate hemogram changes in cats from regions endemic for both Li and FIV infection. Four hundred and ninety-six cats tested for Li (EDTA blood polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescence antibody test) and for FIV infection (enzyme-linked immune assay) were retrospectively evaluated. Hemogram results including blood smear morphological evaluation were statistically compared considering four infection patterns: Li+FIV+, Li+FIV−, Li−FIV+, and Li−FIV−. Significantly lower values of erythrocytes (Li+FIV−: p = 0.0248; Li−FIV+: p = 0.0392) and hemoglobin (Li+FIV: p = 0.0086; Li−FIV+: p = 0.0249) were found in both infections when compared to Li−FIV− cats, and severity of anemia was more frequently moderate in Li-positive cats (p = 0.0206) and severe in FIV infection (p = 0.024). Li infection was associated with monocytosis (p = 0.0013) and morphologically activated monocytes (p = 0.0209). Moreover, FIV infection was associated with the presence of inflammatory leukogram (p = 0.023), and an association between thrombocytosis and the co-infection was found (p = 0.0347). Li infection in cats induces hematological changes compatible with chronic inflammation, some of which are due to co-infection with FIV.
Keywords:
feline; Leishmania infantum; FIV; complete blood count; anemia; monocytes; inflammation; thrombocytosis; South Italy1. Introduction
Leishmaniosis is considered an emerging feline disease probably due to a higher level of cat veterinary care in endemic areas and more sensitive diagnostic techniques available than in the past [1]. Infection in cats is due to the same Leishmania species affecting dogs, and Leishmania infantum (Li) infection has been detected in cats from areas endemic for canine leishmaniosis, particularly in Mediterranean countries (Italy, Spain, Portugal, France, Greece, Turkey, Cyprus, Israel) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8], Latin America (Brazil) [1,6], and Asia (Iran) [1,6].
However, both Li infection and leishmaniosis are less frequent in cats compared to dogs [1,8]. It is likely that most of the infected cats do not develop a disease, possibly due to their innate or adaptive immune response [1,6]. Nevertheless, some cats show a variety of clinical signs [1,6,9] and clinicopathological changes [1,6]. Among the latter, complete blood count (CBC) abnormalities, such as anemia [9,10,11,12,13,14], leukocytosis [12,15,16] with neutrophilia [16], monocytosis [14], eosinophilia [14,15,17], leukopenia [9,10,18], and thrombocytopenia [9,10,19,20] have been reported. However, co-infections or co-morbidities are often detected in cats with leishmaniosis, and they can have a role in the clinical picture observed in cats positive to Li [1,4].
Most cats affected by leishmaniosis are suspected to have an impaired immune response due to concomitant infectious and immune-mediated diseases, or treatment with immunosuppressive drugs [1,6]. In feline Li infections and in clinical cases of feline leishmaniosis (FeL), a significant association with feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) has been detected, but the role of this co-infection is controversial and still under study [1,2,6,14]. Hematological changes are among the most common abnormalities caused by FIV infection. They are caused by different pathomechanisms such as myelosuppression, immunosuppression, autoimmunity, and secondary infections. Anemia [21,22,23], leukopenia [22,23], neutropenia [21,22,24], lymphopenia [21,22], leukocytosis [22], neutrophilia [22], monocytosis [21,22], lymphocytosis [21], and thrombocytopenia [23] have been described.
Few studies compared hematological abnormalities between Li-positive and -negative cats, and they did not find significant differences [5,8]. Spada et al. (2020) evaluated co-infections, but they found only one case of FIV co-infection in that study [5]. In a recent study reporting clinical signs and hematological abnormalities associated with Li and FIV co-infection, no CBC abnormalities were significantly associated with this co-infection [14].
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Power and Sample Size
Assuming an expected Li antibody prevalence of 14%, Li molecular prevalence of 4%, and FIV seroprevalence of 12.9% in Sicily and Calabria regions, a sample size of 499 (Li antibody prevalence), 159 (Li molecular prevalence), and 467 (FIV antibody prevalence) cats were required (99% CI; 4% level of precision) [29,30].
2.2. Study Sites, Cat Enrollment, and Clinical Classification and Sampling Procedures
A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out, analyzing results from three studies already published [28,29,30]. Cats were sampled between 2012 and 2019 at four veterinary clinics in Sicily (Ospedale Veterinario Universitario Didattico, Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Messina, Messina; Ambulatorio Veterinario S. Lucia, Lipari, Messina) and Calabria (Clinica Veterinaria Camagna, Reggio Calabria; Ambulatorio Dr. Cardone, Gioia Tauro, Reggio Calabria) regions. Signalment, history, and physical examination findings were registered in a clinical form. According to physical examination, cats were classified as apparently healthy, affected by signs compatible with feline leishmaniosis [1], and affected by other signs. Clinical manifestations considered compatible with feline leishmaniosis were lymph node enlargement, skin and/or mucocutaneous lesions (mainly ulcerative or nodular), ocular lesions (mainly uveitis), oral lesions, weight loss, anorexia, lethargy, dehydration, pale mucous membranes, hepatomegaly, icterus, cachexia, fever, diarrhea, chronic nasal discharge, splenomegaly, polyuria/polydipsia, itching, dyspnea, wheezing, abortion, and hypothermia [1]. In most cases, cats included in this category showed multiple signs among those listed above. Signs and pathologies categorized as “other signs” were overweight, otitis, cystitis, and cough.
Cats were phlebotomized under physical restraint, and from each cat, about five milliliters of venous blood was collected. One milliliter was placed into a K3EDTA tube and used for CBC evaluation within two hours after collection or stored at +4 °C and used after a maximum of 24 h. The leftover K3EDTA blood was then stored at −20 °C until analyzed for detection of Li DNA or feline leukemia virus infection (FeLV) RNA. The remaining blood was used to make blood smears and to obtain serum after clotting in a dry tube and centrifugation. Each aliquot of serum was stored at −20 °C until analyzed for Li and FIV antibody detection, and FeLV p27 antigen.
Informed consent was obtained from owners, and approval of the ethics committee from the author’s academic institution was obtained.
2.3. Complete Blood Count
Complete blood count was performed using a laser hematology analyzer ProCyte Dx (IDEXX laboratories, Westbrook, ME, USA). Reference intervals of CBC parameters are shown in Table 1. Blood smears were stained by May–Grünwald–Giemsa stain (Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and evaluated microscopically at oil immersion ×1000 magnification [32].
Low platelet count as well as any “smart flag” message reported by the analyzer about leukocyte or platelet count (i.e., inability of the analyzer to make the count or inaccuracy of the analyzer count) were correspondingly confirmed or settled after microscopic examination of blood smears. Blood smears were also examined for cell morphological abnormalities and to exclude as thrombocytopenic samples where platelet clumps were observed.
Cats were considered anemic when hemoglobin concentration was lower than 9.8 g/dL. Anemia severity was classified according to hematocrit (HCT) values as mild (HCT ≥ 20%), moderate (HCT 14–19%), or severe (HCT ≤ 13%) [33]. Anemia was considered regenerative or non-regenerative when reticulocyte count was higher or ≤ 50,000/µL, respectively. According to the mean cell volume (MCV), anemia was then classified into macrocytic (MCV > 53.1 fL), normocytic (MVC 35.9–53.1 fL), or microcytic (MCV < 35.9 fL) and according to the mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) in normochromic (MCHC 28.1–35.8 g/dL) or hypochromic (MCHC < 28.1 mg/dL) cases.
2.4. Diagnosis of L. infantum Infection
Anti-Li immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies (Ab) were tested by immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT) using Li (strain MHOM/IT/80/IPT1) antigen slides produced by CReNaL (Centro di Referenza Nazionale per la Leishmaniosi, Palermo, Italy) following Office International des Epizooties (OIE) Terrestrial Manual protocol [36]. Fluoresceinated rabbit anti-cat IgG Ab (working anti-feline IgG (H+L)-FITC, Füller Laboratories, Fullertone, CA, USA) or fluoresceinated goat anti-cat IgG antibody (anti-cat IgG-FITC conjugate, SIGMA, Sant Louis, MI, USA) were used. The manufacturer’s protocol was followed, and the end-point titer of positive samples was determined preparing PBS serial twofold dilutions of serum. The cut off dilution value for positivity was set at 1:80 [37,38].
2.5. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
DNA was extracted from blood EDTA using the PureLink Genomic DNA kit (Invitrogen, California, USA) in different steps. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, 200 µL of whole blood was employed for DNA extraction. At the end of the extraction procedure, DNA was eluted in 100 µL of PureLink genomic elution buffer and stored at −20 °C until used. The PCR test was targeted at the constant region in the minicircle Kinetoplast DNA (NCBI accession number AF291093). Real-time polymerase chain reaction of blood EDTA was developed by the CFX96 Real-time System (Bio-Rad Laboratories s.r.l.) using TaqMan Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). A multiplex PCR was optimized including an internal DNA control with specific probe and primer according to the VIC internal PC kit (Applied Biosystems). Real-time PCR was carried out in a final volume of 20 µL including a final concentration 1× of TaqMan Master Mix (Applied Biosystems); 0.3 µM of each primer (5′AAAATGGCATTTTCGGGCC-3′ and 5′-GGCGTTCTGCGAAAACCG-3′); 0.25 µM of the fluorogenic probe (5′-FAM-TGGGTGCAGAAATCCCGTTCA3′-BHQ1); and 50 ng of DNA, 1× Exo IPC Mix, and 1× Exo IPC DNA. The thermal cycle conditions consisted of 150 s initial incubation at 50 °C and 10 min of initial denaturation at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and annealing–polymerization at 60 °C for 35 s according to the protocol of Castelli et al. [39]. Samples were amplified in a single 96-well plate, and in each one, a positive control containing genomic L. infantum DNA and a negative control without DNA were included. Each standard, sample, and negative control was analyzed in duplicate for each run. Cycle threshold (Ct) value was calculated for each sample by determining the point of the fluorescence value exceeding the threshold limit. The parasitic DNA load was defined in each examined sample by comparison of the data with a specific standard curve on the basis of the number of Leishmania per milliliter of extracted volume. Standard curves were prepared for both the Leishmania gene target and the internal PC (IPC Applied Biosystems). A stock solution of L. infantum DNA was obtained by extraction from 109 promastigotes/mL. Tenfold serial dilutions of the DNA stock solution were performed to obtain the six points of the curve spanning from 106 to 101 DNA equivalent cells. The standard curve, calculated by independent experiments, was linear over at least 6 log ranges of DNA concentration points with an average correlation coefficient of 0.988. The difference for each point of the curve was one log factor [39].
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 7.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Distribution of continuous variables was evaluated by D’Agostino–Pearson omnibus normality test, and descriptive statistics was performed for all the evaluated variables.
Cats were classified according to four infection patterns: Li positive (IFAT and/or PCR) and FIV positive (Li+FIV+), Li positive and FIV negative (Li+FIV−), Li negative (IFAT and PCR) and FIV positive (Li−FIV+), and Li negative and FIV negative (Li−FIV−).
Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate associations between the four infection patterns considered and signalment, history, clinical examination findings, CBC with blood smear morphological examination, degree of anemia, and its classification (regenerative/non regenerative, mycro/normo/macrocytic, hypo/normochromic). Parameters with 0 frequency were excluded from Fisher’s exact test.
Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test were used to compare CBC values among the four infection patterns observed. This was performed for all cats enrolled as well as for those with CBC alterations.
The Spearman’s rank correlation test was used to assess the correlation between antibody titer and hemogram values of cats with CBC abnormalities.
p-values < 0.05 were considered significant.
3. Results
3.1. Cat Population Demographic and Clinical Data
Four hundred and ninety-six cats were enrolled: 319 from Calabria and 177 from Sicily regions. Signalment, history, and clinical data collected are shown in Table 2. Cats were aged between 5 and 228 months (median = 36 months, 25% percentile = 12 months, 75% percentile = 74 months).
Prevalence of males was significantly higher in Li−FIV+ than both Li+FIV− and Li−FIV− cats (Table 2 and Table 3). Moreover, prevalence of males was higher in Li+FIV+ than Li−FIV− animals (Table 2 and Table 3). Prevalence of adult cats was higher, when compared to young cats, in Li+FIV+ and Li−FIV+ than Li−FIV− (Table 2 and Table 3). Finally, prevalence of senior cats was higher compared to young cats in Li+FIV+, Li+FIV−, and Li−FIV+ than Li−FIV− (Table 2 and Table 3).
3.2. L. infantum and Retroviral Infections
Anti-Li antibodies were detected in 69 (13.9%) cats, Li DNA was found in 16 (3.2%) animals, and anti-FIV antibodies were detected in 50 (10.1%) cats. The four infection patterns were observed as follows: Li+FIV+ (n = 16), Li+FIV− (n = 61), Li−FIV+ (n = 34), and Li−FIV− (n = 385). All cats were FeLV negative.
3.3. Complete Blood Count
Lower values of erythrocytes were detected in Li+FIV− and in Li−FIV+ cats compared to Li−FIV− cats (Table 4 and Table 5). Additionally, Li−FIV+ cats had lower values of hemoglobin than Li−FIV− cats (Table 4 and Table 5) and lower values of MCHC than Li+FIV+, Li+FIV−, and Li−FIV− cats (Table 4 and Table 5). When only anemic cats were considered, lower values of hemoglobin were detected in Li+FIV− cats (median = 7.05; 25–75° percentile = 6.05–8.2) than in Li−FIV− cats (median = 8.7; 25–75° percentile = 8–9.1) (Table 5).
Moderate anemia was more frequently observed when compared with mild anemia in Li+FIV− cats than Li−FIV− cats (Table 6 and Table 7). Moreover, severe anemia was more frequently found when compared to mild anemia in Li−FIV+ cats than Li−FIV− cats (Table 6 and Table 7). Finally, hypochromic anemia was more frequently found in Li−FIV+ (30.77%) than in Li−FIV− cats (7.53%), and macrocytic anemia was more frequently found in Li−FIV+ cats (36.36% and 50%, respectively) when compared to normocytic and microcytic cases than Li−FIV− cats (4.82% and 12.9%, respectively) (Table 7).
Data regarding reticulocyte hemoglobin content (Retic-Hb) were available for 113 hemograms (median = 14.6, range = 13–23.2; 25–75° percentile = 13.6–15.6). Normal Retic-Hb values were detected in 5 Li+FIV+ cats, 9 Li+FIV− cats, 7 Li−FIV+ cats, and in 91 Li−FIV− cats, and a low value was observed in only one cat. This domestic shorthair, male, young cat was apparently healthy and Li−FIV−, and neutropenia was the unique abnormality found in the CBC.
Monocytosis and morphologically activated monocytes were more frequently observed in Li+FIV− cats compared to Li−FIV− cats (Table 8 and Table 9). Inflammatory leukogram was more frequently detected in Li−FIV+ cats than Li−FIV− cats (Table 8 and Table 9).
Frequency of thrombocytosis was significantly higher in Li+FIV+ cats than Li−FIV− cats (Table 8 and Table 9).
No correlation was found between antibody titer against Li and CBC values.
A statistical evaluation of the association between clinical signs and hematological alterations was not made because almost all the examined cats showed at least one clinical sign compatible with leishmaniosis (Table 10).
4. Discussion
In this retrospective cross-sectional study, a prevalence of 13.9% for Li antibody and 3.2% for Li DNA detection in blood samples was found, and 10.1% of cats had antibodies against FIV. Conversely, no cats were FeLV positive. These results confirm that Southern Italy, particularly Sicily and Calabria, is an endemic area for Li and FIV, while FeLV is sporadic.
According to the results of the present study, there was no significant association between anemia and infections with Li or FIV; however, significantly lower values of erythrocytes (Li+FIV− and Li−FIV+) and hemoglobin (Li−FIV+) were found in both infections when considering all results, and significantly lower values of hemoglobin were detected in Li infection (Li+FIV−) when only anemic cats were considered. Co-infection did not cause significantly lower values compared to the other patterns. However, the number of Li+FIV+ cats was small (16), and a higher number of co-infected cats should be analyzed. Severity of anemia was more frequently moderate in cats infected with Li and severe in the case of FIV infection. A considerable percentage of Li−FIV− cats had anemia (28.8%), and it was mostly a mild anemia (88.2%). However, only 21.3% of Li−FIV− cats were apparently healthy at physical examination and, unfortunately, we could not analyze data about other pathogens and pathologies potentially causing anemia in the studied cats. Additionally, FIV-infected cats had more frequently lower MCHC values and presented hypochromic and macrocytic anemia.
Mild-to-severe normocytic normochromic non-regenerative anemia is the most frequent hematological abnormality reported in clinical cases of feline leishmaniosis [1,6]. Anemia is also one of the most common laboratory findings in dogs with leishmaniosis with multiple and not fully known pathomechanisms [40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. In fact, blood loss, hemolysis, renal failure, chronic inflammation, and bone marrow alterations may be responsible for anemia in dogs with leishmaniosis. Erythroid hypoplasia [19,47,48,49]; erythroid dysplasia [50]; myelophthisis with infiltration of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and macrophages [19]; and erythrophagocytosis of erythroblasts [50] are the bone marrow alterations found in canine leishmaniosis. Interleukins produced by Th1 cells, such as IFN-γ, would play a role in the pathogenesis of anemia through inhibition of the earliest stages of erythroid differentiation and proliferation [51], alteration of iron homeostasis, induction of iron retention in macrophages, and consequent limitation of iron availability during erythropoiesis [49,51,52]. Moreover, the increased number of activated macrophages typical of leishmaniosis can promote erythrophagocytosis [53]. Changes in erythrocyte membrane fluidity, which may lead to their sequestration in the spleen, was also related to anemia in canine leishmaniosis [54]. Currently, there is a lack of data on the possible pathogenesis of anemia in feline leishmaniosis.
Both regenerative and non-regenerative anemia are commonly observed in FIV-infected cats because of a direct pathogenic effect of the virus. Multifactorial mechanisms have been proposed: ineffective hematopoiesis due to FIV infection of the bone marrow stromal cells that alters normal hematopoietic functions [55] and immunomediated destruction of erythrocytes due to an overactive immune response [56,57]. However, concomitant diseases often play an important role. This is the case of hemolytic anemia caused by hemotropic mycoplasmas [58,59]. Moreover, suppression of the immune system induced by FIV is associated with chronic opportunistic infections responsible for various hematological changes included normocytic normochromic non-regenerative anemia [23].
Most of the morphological alterations of erythrocytes were very rare and, when it was possible to use Fisher’s exact test, no significant differences were found according to the infection pattern.
We found that Li infection was associated with monocytosis and with the occurrence of morphologically activated monocytes. Monocytosis has rarely been reported in Li-infected cats [14]. Conversely, it is considered a finding consistent with leishmaniosis in dogs [46], and higher monocyte concentrations have been detected in dogs with positive splenic culture when compared with dogs with negative spleen culture [49], in dogs with leishmaniosis when compared to healthy dogs [60], and in oligosymptomatic Li-infected dogs when compared to non-infected dogs [47].
Monocytes play a crucial role in Leishmania infection, contributing to both innate immune defense and adaptative immune responses [47,61,62]. Moreover, monocytosis occurs in many conditions in cats, including acute and chronic inflammation and tissue destruction due to trauma-related injuries, suppuration, necrosis, pyogranulomatous inflammation, hemolysis, malignancy, and immune-mediated disorders [34].
In the present study, FIV infection was associated with the presence of inflammatory leukogram. FIV-induced immunosuppression could have facilitated a secondary or opportunistic infection, to which an appropriate inflammatory response was made [22]. Many FIV-infected cats, with concomitant or secondary infections, still have an appropriate hematological response and show leukocytosis, neutrophilia, and left shift in association with purulent or inflammatory processes [59]. Neutrophilia and monocytosis were common hematological abnormalities seen in cats with naturally occurring FIV infection in previous studies [14,21,22,63]. We could not evaluate the clinical stage of FIV-positive cats under study but, on the basis of the association of the retroviral infection with the occurrence of inflammatory leukograms, they were not in the end stage of disease.
We found an association between thrombocytosis and the co-infection by Li and FIV, although this infection pattern involved only 11 cats, and this abnormality affected a small number of cats (2/11). Thrombocytosis has never been described before in cats with Li or FIV infection and in the case of co-infection. Thrombocytosis has been found in dogs with Li infection, and it was assumed that it can be related to the chronic inflammatory process [44]. The so-called reactive thrombocytosis is the most common form of thrombocytosis in dogs and cats, and it is caused by a high level of inflammatory cytokines that stimulate thrombopoiesis [64]. Importantly, the two cases of thrombocytosis occurred in cats with an inflammatory leukogram. This supports the hypothesis of a reactive mechanism for thrombocytosis of cats coinfected with Li and FIV.
We evaluated for the first time the reticulocyte hemoglobin content in Li- and FIV-positive cats. The rationale for investigating this index was that chronic inflammation is associated with functional iron deficiency and can cause a non-regenerative normocytic normochromic anemia. Reticulocyte hemoglobin content is one of the reticulocyte indices considered as markers of iron deficiency and has been recently included in the hemogram variables investigated by veterinary laser hematology analyzers. As it was introduced in the analyzer used in this study in 2019, we were able to include this variable in a limited number of cats (113). Most of them (81%) were negative to both the investigated infections, and a low value was found in only one negative cat. As far as we know, only two studies investigated reticulocyte hemoglobin content in cats, and Keiner et al. (2020) found that sensitivity for iron-limited erythropoiesis was low [65,66]. Further clinical studies about cat reticulocyte indices are indeed needed.
As previously reported, a significant association between Li antibody positivity and old age was detected [1,6,31]. This finding can be explained by a long-lasting course of antibody positivity after cat seroconversion and a good life expectancy for antibody-positive cats. When these two latter conditions are met, in Li-endemic areas where no preventative measures are implemented, the number of seropositive cats can increase year by year, and prevalence will be higher according to the number of transmission seasons the cat passed.
Moreover, male sex [22,24,67] and adulthood or old age were found to be risk factors for FIV infection [21,22,67], as largely reported in the literature.
This study has some limitations, and they are related to the retrospective approach. In fact, this has prevented the possibility to better assess relationships between hematological changes and the clinical status of cats. In particular, the stage of the disease was not considered for FIV-positive cats. This could have been a bias, as most cats do not exhibit immunosuppressive or myelosuppressive effects for a long time [56], and hematological sequelae of co-infection possibly depend on the cat FIV stage. Moreover, apart from FeLV infection, other pathogens were not considered, as well as co-morbidities affecting the hemogram. Additionally, methods used for testing retroviral infections were inhomogeneous. However, all the different tests we used have high sensitivity and specificity and are widely used in relevant studies regarding feline pathogens [68,69,70]. Finally, despite the high prevalence found for Li and FIV, the infection pattern that included co-infected cats (Li+FIV+) consisted of a small number of subjects. A more homogeneous number of samples is required in each category to obtain a robust analysis of results.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, Li infection in cats is associated with hematological changes; is compatible with a chronic inflammation; and includes moderate anemia, monocytosis, and morphologically activated monocytes. Some of them, such as thrombocytosis, arise in the case of co-infection with FIV and should be further investigated. The hemogram obtained with a routine test such as CBC can therefore provide clinicians with data supporting a suspicion of feline leishmaniosis when alterations suggestive of chronic inflammation are found.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, G.D.; methodology, G.D., M.M. and M.G.P.; validation, G.D. and M.M.; formal analysis, G.D. and M.M.; investigation, F.B., G.C., G.D., M.M., M.F.P. and V.P.; data curation, G.D., M.M., M.F.P. and V.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, F.B., G.C., G.D., M.G.P. and M.F.P.; visualization, M.M.; supervision, M.G.P.; project administration, M.G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics and Welfare Committee of the Department of Veterinary Science, University of Messina (UniMe) (protocol code 018_2017 approved on 20 November 2017).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data set analyzed for the current study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
Clinica Veterinaria Camagna (Reggio Calabria, Italy) for clinical support and free use of equipment, and Angela Burrascano for technical support.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Pennisi, M.G.; Cardoso, L.; Baneth, G.; Bourdeau, P.; Koutinas, A.; Miró, G.; Oliva, G.; Solano-Gallego, L. LeishVet update and recommendations on feline leishmaniosis. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iatta, R.; Mendoza-Roldan, J.A.; Latrofa, M.S.; Cascio, A.; Brianti, E.; Pombi, M.; Gabrielli, S.; Otranto, D. Leishmania tarentolae and Leishmania infantum in humans, dogs and cats in the Pelagie archipelago, southern Italy. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0009817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baneth, G.; Nachum-Biala, Y.; Zuberi, A.; Zipori-Barki, N.; Orshan, L.; Kleinerman, G.; Shmueli-Goldin, A.; Bellaiche, M.; Leszkowicz-Mazuz, M.; Salant, H.; et al. Leishmania infection in cats and dogs housed together in an animal shelter reveals a higher parasite load in infected dogs despite a greater seroprevalence among cats. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chatzis, M.K.; Xenoulis, P.G.; Leontides, L.; Kasabalis, D.; Mylonakis, M.E.; Andreadou, M.; Ikonomopoulos, J.; Saridomichelakis, M.N. Evaluation of clinicopathological abnormalities in sick cats naturally infected by Leishmania infantum. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spada, E.; Perego, R.; Vitale, F.; Bruno, F.; Castelli, G.; Tarantola, G.; Baggiani, L.; Magistrelli, S.; Proverbio, D. Feline Leishmania spp. infection in a non-endemic area of Northern Italy. Animals 2020, 10, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, A.; Maia, C. Leishmania infection in cats and feline leishmaniosis: An updated review with a proposal of a diagnosis algorithm and prevention guidelines. Curr. Res. Parasitol. Vector Borne Dis. 2021, 1, 100035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cardoso, L.; Schallig, H.; Persichetti, M.F.; Pennisi, M.G. New Epidemiological aspects of animal leishmaniosis in Europe: The role of vertebrate hosts other than dogs. Pathogens 2021, 10, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urbani, L.; Tirolo, A.; Salvatore, D.; Tumbarello, M.; Segatore, S.; Battilani, M.; Balboni, A.; Dondi, F. Serological, molecular and clinicopathological findings associated with Leishmania infantum infection in cats in Northern Italy. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2020, 22, 935–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pennisi, M.G.; Venza, M.; Reale, S.; Vitale, F.; Lo Giudice, S. Case report of leishmaniasis in four cats. Vet. Res. Commun. 2004, 28, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcos, R.; Santos, M.; Malhão, F.; Pereira, R.; Fernandes, A.C.; Montenegro, L.; Roccabianca, P. Pancytopenia in a cat with visceral leishmaniasis. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 2009, 38, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pimenta, P.; Alves-Pimenta, S.; Barros, J.; Barbosa, P.; Rodrigues, A.; Pereira, M.J.; Maltez, L.; Gama, A.; Cristóvão, J.M.; Campino, L.; et al. Feline leishmaniosis in Portugal: 3 cases (year 2014). Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2015, 1–2, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brianti, E.; Celi, N.; Napoli, E.; Abbate, J.M.; Arfuso, F.; Gaglio, G.; Iatta, R.; Giannetto, S.; Gramiccia, M.; Otranto, D. Treatment and long-term follow-up of a cat with leishmaniosis. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Gallego, A.; Feo Bernabe, L.; Dalmau, A.; Esteban-Saltiveri, D.; Font, A.; Leiva, M.; Ortuñez-Navarro, A.; Peña, M.T.; Tabar, M.D.; Real-Sampietro, L.; et al. Feline leishmaniosis: Diagnosis, treatment and outcome in 16 cats. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2020, 22, 993–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Priolo, V.; Masucci, M.; Donato, G.; Solano-Gallego, L.; Martínez-Orellana, P.; Persichetti, M.F.; Raya-Bermúdez, A.; Vitale, F.; Pennisi, M.G. Association between feline immunodeficiency virus and Leishmania infantum infections in cats: A retrospective matched case-control study. Parasit. Vectors 2022, 15, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozon, C.; Marty, P.; Pratlong, F.; Breton, C.; Blein, M.; Lelièvre, A.; Haas, P. Disseminated feline leishmaniosis due to Leishmania infantum in Southern France. Vet. Parasitol. 1998, 75, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva, S.M.; Rabelo, P.F.; Gontijo, N.d.F.; Ribeiro, R.R.; Melo, M.N.; Ribeiro, V.M.; Michalick, M.S. First report of infection of Lutzomyia longipalpis by Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum from a naturally infected cat of Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 174, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hervás, J.; De Lara, F.C.-M.; Sánchez-Isarria, M.A.; Pellicer, S.; Carrasco, L.; Castillo, J.A.; Gómez-Villamandos, J.C. Two cases of feline visceral and cutaneous leishmaniosis in Spain. J. Feline Med. Surg. 1999, 1, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhtardanesh, B.; Sharifi, I.; Mohammadi, A.; Mostafavi, M.; Hakimmipour, M.; Pourafshar, N.G. Feline visceral leishmaniasis in Kerman, southeast of Iran: Serological and molecular study. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2017, 54, 96–102. [Google Scholar]
- Pimenta da Costa-Val, A.; Roris Cavalcanti, R.; de Figueiredo Gontijo, N.; Marques Michalick, M.M.; Alexander, B.; Williams, P.; Melo, M.N. Canine visceral leishmaniasis: Relationships between clinical status, humoral immune response, haematology and Lutzomyia (Lutzomyia) longipalpis infectivity. Vet. J. 2007, 174, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, A.; Valente, J.; Parreira, R.; Cristovão, J.M.; Azinheira, S.; Campino, L.; Maia, C. An unusual case of feline leishmaniosis with involvement of the mammary glands. Top. Companion Anim. Med. 2019, 37, 100356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hopper, C.D.; Sparkes, A.H.; Gruffydd-Jones, T.J.; Crispin, S.M.; Muir, P.; Harbour, D.A.; Stokes, C.R. Clinical and laboratory findings in cats infected with feline immunodeficiency virus. Vet. Rec. 1989, 125, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sparkes, A.H.; Hopper, C.D.; Millard, W.G.; Gruffydd-Jones, T.J.; Harbour, D.A. Feline immunodeficiency virus infection. Clinicopathologic findings in 90 naturally occurring cases. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 1993, 7, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- da Costa, F.V.A.; Valle, D.d.F.; Machado, G.; Corbellini, L.G.; Coelho, E.M.; Rosa, R.B.; González, F.H.D. Hematological findings and factors associated with feline leukemia virus (FeLV) and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) positivity in cats from southern Brazil. Pesq. Vet. Bras. 2017, 37, 1531–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gleich, S.; Hartmann, K. Hematology and serum biochemistry of feline immunodeficiency virus-infected and feline leukemia virus-infected cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2009, 23, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pennisi, M.G.; Masucci, M.; Catarsini, O. Presenza di Anticorpi Anti-Leishmania in Gatti FIV+ che Vivono in Zona Endemica. In Proceedings of the LII Convegno Società italiana Scienze Veterinarie, Silvi Marina, Italy, 17–19 September 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Pennisi, M.G.; Lupo, T.; Malara, D.; Masucci, M.; Migliazzo, A.; Lombardo, G. Serological and molecular prevalence of Leishmania infantum infection in cats from Southern Italy. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2012, 14, 656–657. [Google Scholar]
- Otranto, D.; Napoli, E.; Latrofa, M.S.; Annoscia, G.; Tarallo, V.D.; Greco, G.; Lorusso, E.; Gulotta, L.; Falsone, L.; Basano, F.S.; et al. Feline and canine leishmaniosis and other vector-borne diseases in the Aeolian Islands: Pathogen and vector circulation in a confined environment. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 236, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Persichetti, M.F.; Pennisi, M.G.; Vullo, A.; Masucci, M.; Migliazzo, A.; Solano-Gallego, L. Clinical evaluation of outdoor cats exposed to ectoparasites and associated risk for vector-borne infections in southern Italy. Parasit. Vectors 2018, 11, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priolo, V.; Martínez-Orellana, P.; Pennisi, M.G.; Masucci, M.; Prandi, D.; Ippolito, D.; Bruno, F.; Castelli, G.; Solano-Gallego, L. Leishmania infantum-specific IFN-γ production in stimulated blood from cats living in areas where canine leishmaniosis is endemic. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donato, G.; Masucci, M.; De Luca, E.; Alibrandi, A.; De Majo, M.; Berjaoui, S.; Martino, C.; Mangano, C.; Lorusso, A.; Pennisi, M.G. Feline Morbillivirus in Southern Italy: Epidemiology, Clinico-Pathological Features and Phylogenetic Analysis in Cats. Viruses 2021, 13, 1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iatta, R.; Furlanello, T.; Colella, V.; Tarallo, V.D.; Latrofa, M.S.; Brianti, E.; Trerotoli, P.; Decaro, N.; Lorusso, E.; Schunack, B.; et al. A nationwide survey of Leishmania infantum infection in cats and associated risk factors in Italy. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piaton, E.; Fabre, M.; Goubin-Versini, I.; Bretz-Grenier, M.F.; Courtade-Saïdi, M.; Vincent, S.; Belleannée, G.; Thivolet, F.; Boutonnat, J.; Debaque, H.; et al. Guidelines for May-Grünwald-Giemsa staining in haematology and non-gynaecological cytopathology: Recommendations of the French Society of Clinical Cytology (SFCC) and of the French Association for Quality Assurance in Anatomic and Cytologic Pathology (AFAQAP). Cytopathology 2016, 27, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Tvedten, H. Laboratory and Clinical Diagnosis of Anemia. In Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology, 6th ed.; Weiss, D.J., Wardrop, K.J., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2010; pp. 152–161. [Google Scholar]
- Valenciano, A.C.; Decker, L.S.; Cowell, R.L. Interpretation of Feline Leucocyte Responses. In Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology, 6th ed.; Weiss, D.J., Wardrop, K.J., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2010; pp. 335–344. [Google Scholar]
- Harvey, J.W. Evaluation of Leukocyte Disorders. In Veterinary Hematology: A Diagnostic Guide and Color Atlas, 1st ed.; Elsevier Saunders: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2012; pp. 122–176. [Google Scholar]
- Office International des Epizooties (OIE) Terrestrial Manual Protocol. Available online: https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/fr/Health_standards/tahm/3.01.11_LEISHMANIOSIS.pdf (accessed on 20 August 2022).
- Persichetti, M.F.; Solano-Gallego, L.; Serrano, L.; Altet, L.; Reale, S.; Masucci, M.; Pennisi, M.G. Detection of vector-borne pathogens in cats and their ectoparasites in southern Italy. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Persichetti, M.F.; Solano-Gallego, L.; Vullo, A.; Masucci, M.; Marty, P.; Delaunay, P.; Vitale, F.; Pennisi, M.G. Diagnostic performance of ELISA, IFAT and Western blot for the detection of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in cats using a Bayesian analysis without a gold standard. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Castelli, G.; Bruno, F.; Reale, S.; Catanzaro, S.; Valenza, V.; Vitale, F. Molecular diagnosis of leishmaniasis: Quantification of parasite load by a real-time PCR assay with high sensitivity. Pathogens 2021, 10, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Slappendel, R.J. Canine leishmaniasis. A review based on 95 cases in The Netherlands. Vet. Q. 1988, 10, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carneiro de Freitas, J.C.; Sousa Nunes-Pinheiro, D.C.; Lopes Neto, B.E.; Lemon Santos, G.J.; Amaral de Abreu, C.R.; Rocha Braga, R.; de Morais Campos, R.; Fernandes de Oliveira, L. Clinical and laboratory alterations in dogs naturally infected by Leishmania chagasi. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2012, 45, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solano-Gallego, L.; Miró, G.; Koutinas, A.; Cardoso, L.; Pennisi, M.G.; Ferrer, L.; Bourdeau, P.; Oliva, G.; Baneth, G. The LeishVet Group. LeishVet guidelines for the practical management of canine leishmaniosis. Parasit. Vectors 2011, 4, 86. [Google Scholar]
- Figueredo, L.A.; de Paiva-Cavalcanti, M.; Almeida, E.L.; Brandão-Filho, S.P.; Dantas-Torres, F. Clinical and hematological findings in Leishmania braziliensis-infected dogs from Pernambuco, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2012, 21, 418–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirschmann Caruccio, L.; Simon Ferreira, C.; Brod Soares, C.; Radin, J.; Rosa Saydelles, C.; Recuero Coelho, A.L. Clinical and hematological evaluation of leishmaniasis serum-positive dogs in Rio Grande do Sul. Sci. Anim. Heath 2016, 4, 179–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Argôlo Montargil, S.M.; Santos Carvalho, S.; Sena de Oliveira, G.M.; Días Munhoz, A.; Alberto Carlos, R.S.; Arias Wenceslau, A. Clinical, Hematological and Biochemical Profiles of Dogs with Leishmania infantum. Acta Sci. Vet. 2018, 46, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paltrinieri, S.; Solano-Gallego, L.; Fondati, A.; Lubas, G.; Gradoni, L.; Castagnaro, M.; Crotti, A.; Maroli, M.; Oliva, G.; Roura, X.; et al. Canine Leishmaniasis Working Group, Italian Society of Veterinarians of Companion Animals. Guidelines for diagnosis and clinical classification of leishmaniasis in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2010, 236, 1184–1191. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Trópia de Abreu, R.; Carvalho, M.D.; Carneiro, C.M.; Giunchetti, R.C.; Teixeira-Carvalho, A.; Martins-Filho, O.A.; Coura-Vital, W.; Corrêa-Oliveira, R.; Reis, A.B. Influence of clinical status and parasite load on erythropoiesis and leucopoiesis in dogs naturally infected with leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Carvalho Nicolato, R.; Trópia de Abreu, R.; Mendes Roatt, B.; de Oliveira Aguiar-Soares, R.D.; Soares Reis, L.E.; das Graças Carvalho, M.; Martins Carneiro, C.; Cordeiro Giunchetti, R.; Maduro Bouillet, L.E.; Silveira Lemos, D.; et al. Clinical forms of canine visceral Leishmaniasis in naturally Leishmania infantum-infected dogs and related myelogram and hemogram changes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82947. [Google Scholar]
- Almeida, V.; Lima, I.; Fraga, D.; Carrillo, E.; Moreno, J.; Dos-Santos, W.L.C. Hematological changes in dogs with visceral leishmaniasis are associated with increased IFN-γ and TNF gene expression levels in the bone marrow. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Foglia Manzillo, V.; Restucci, B.; Pagano, A.; Gradoni, L.; Oliva, G. Pathological changes in the bone marrow of dogs with leishmaniosis. Vet. Rec. 2006, 158, 690–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Bruin, A.M.; Voermans, C.; Nolte, M.A. Impact of interferon-γ on hematopoiesis. Blood 2014, 124, 2479–2486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weiss, G. Iron metabolism in the anemia of chronic disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1790, 682–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zoller, E.E.; Lykens, J.E.; Terrell, C.E.; Aliberti, J.; Filipovich, A.H.; Henson, P.M.; Jordan, M.B. Hemophagocytosis causes a consumptive anemia of inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 1203–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Luna, R.; Ferrante, M.; Severino, L.; Ambrosio, R.; Piantedosi, D.; Gradoni, L.; Lucisano, A.; Persechino, A. Decreased lipid fluidity of the erythrocyte membrane in dogs with leishmaniasis-associated anaemia. J. Comp. Pathol. 2000, 122, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanabe, T.; Yamamoto, J.K. Phenotypic and functional characteristics of FIV infection in the bone marrow stroma. Virology 2001, 282, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, K. Clinical aspects of feline retroviruses: A review. Viruses 2012, 4, 2684–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fujino, Y.; Horiuchi, H.; Mizukoshi, F.; Baba, K.; Goto-Koshino, Y.; Ohno, K.; Tsujimoto, H. Prevalence of hematological abnormalities and detection of infected bone marrow cells in asymptomatic cats with feline immunodeficiency virus infection. Vet. Microbiol. 2009, 136, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Linenberger, M.L.; Abkowitz, J.L. Haematological disorders associated with feline retrovirus infections. Baillieres. Clin. Haematol. 1995, 8, 73–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sparkes, A.; Papasouliotis, K. Infezioni da retrovirus nel gatto. In Ematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale Nel Cane e nel Gatto, 1st ed.; Day, M., Mackin, A., Littlewood, J.D., Eds.; UTET: Torino, Italy, 2004; pp. 162–170. [Google Scholar]
- Meléndez-Lazo, A.; Ordeix, L.; Planellas, M.; Pastor, J.; Solano-Gallego, L. Clinicopathological findings in sick dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum: Comparison of five different clinical classification systems. Res. Vet. Sci. 2018, 117, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Loría-Cervera, E.N.; Andrade-Narvaez, F. The role of monocytes/macrophages in Leishmania infection: A glance at the human response. Acta Trop. 2020, 207, 105456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa-da-Silva, A.C.; Nascimento, D.O.; Ferreira, J.R.M.; Guimarães-Pinto, K.; Freire-de-Lima, L.; Morrot, A.; Decote-Ricardo, D.; Filardy, A.A.; Freire-de-Lima, C.G. Immune Responses in Leishmaniasis: An Overview. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lutz, H.; Hoise, M. Feline Immunodeficiency Virus. In Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology, 6th ed.; Weiss, D.D., Wardrop, K.J., Eds.; Wiley-Blakwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2010; pp. 393–399. [Google Scholar]
- Stokol, T. Essential thrombocythemia and reactive thrombocytosis. In Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology, 6th ed.; Weiss, D.J., Wardrop, K.J., Eds.; Wiley-Blakwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2010; pp. 605–611. [Google Scholar]
- Keiner, M.; Fuchs, J.; Bauer, N.; Moritz, A. Evaluation of reticulocyte hemoglobin content (RETIC-HGB) for the diagnosis of iron-limited erythropoiesis in cats. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 2020, 49, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunt, A.; Jugan, M.C. Anemia, iron deficiency, and cobalamin deficiency in cats with chronic gastrointestinal disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2021, 35, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liem, B.P.; Dhand, N.K.; Pepper, A.E.; Barrs, V.R.; Beatty, J.A. Clinical findings and survival in cats naturally infected with feline immunodeficiency virus. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2013, 27, 798–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Luca, E.; Crisi, P.E.; Marcacci, M.; Malatesta, D.; Di Sabatino, D.; Cito, F.; D’Alterio, N.; Puglia, I.; Berjaoui, S.; Colaianni, M.L.; et al. Epidemiology, pathological aspects and genome heterogeneity of feline morbillivirus in Italy. Vet. Microbiol. 2020, 240, 108484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, K.; Griessmayr, P.; Schulz, B.; Greene, C.E.; Vidyashankar, A.N.; Jarrett, O.; Egberink, H.F. Quality of different in-clinic test systems for feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus infection. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2007, 9, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rivas, A.K.; Alcover, M.; Martínez-Orellana, P.; Montserrat-Sangrà, S.; Nachum-Biala, Y.; Bardagí, M.; Fisa, R.; Riera, C.; Baneth, G.; Solano-Gallego, L. Clinical and diagnostic aspects of feline cutaneous leishmaniosis in Venezuela. Parasit. Vectors 2018, 11, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table 1.
IDEXX ProCyte Dx reference intervals of complete blood count (CBC) parameters considered for statistical evaluation.
Table 1.
IDEXX ProCyte Dx reference intervals of complete blood count (CBC) parameters considered for statistical evaluation.
| Parameters | Unit of Measure | Reference Interval |
|---|---|---|
| Red blood cells | M/µL | 6.54–12.2 |
| Hematocrit | % | 30.3–52.3 |
| Hemoglobin | g/dL | 9.8–16.2 |
| MCV | fL | 35.9–53.1 |
| MCHC | g/dL | 28.1–35.8 |
| Reticulocytes | K/µL | 3–50 |
| Retic-Hb | pg | 13.2–20.8 |
| White blood cells | K/µL | 2.87–17.02 |
| Neutrophils | K/µL | 2.3–10.29 |
| Lymphocytes | K/µL | 0.92–6.88 |
| Monocytes | K/µL | 0.05–0.67 |
| Eosinophils | K/µL | 0.17–1.57 |
| Basophils | K/µL | 0.01–0.26 |
| Platelets | K/µL | 151–600 |
MCV = mean cell volume; MCHC = mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; Retic-Hb = reticulocyte hemoglobin content.
Table 2.
Data from signalment, history, and clinical examination (n (%)) of total enrolled cats (total) and of the cats classified according to their infection pattern (Li+FIV+; Li+FIV−; Li−FIV+; Li−FIV−).
Table 2.
Data from signalment, history, and clinical examination (n (%)) of total enrolled cats (total) and of the cats classified according to their infection pattern (Li+FIV+; Li+FIV−; Li−FIV+; Li−FIV−).
| Signalment, History, and Clinical Data | Total | Li+FIV+ | Li+FIV− | Li−FIV+ | Li−FIV− |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | |||||
| Calabria | 319 (64.3) | 8/16 (50) | 42/61 (68.8) | 25/34 (73.5) | 244/385 (63.4) |
| Sicily | 177 (35.7) | 8/16 (50) | 19/61 (31.1) | 9/34 (26.5) | 141/385 (36.6) |
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 212 (42.7) | 11/16 * (68.7) | 25/61 * (41) | 22/34 * (64.7) | 154/385 * (40) |
| Female | 284 (57.3) | 5/16 (31.2) | 36/61 (59) | 12/34 (35.3) | 231/385 (60) |
| Breed | |||||
| DSH and mixed breed | 473 (95.4) | 16/16 (100) | 58/61 (95.1) | 34/34 (100) | 365/385 (94.8) |
| Pure breed | 23 (4.6) | 0/16 | 3/61 (4.9) | 0/34 | 20/385 (5.2) |
| Age group | |||||
| Young | 230 (46.4) | 2/16 (12.5) | 23/61 (37.7) | 6/34 (17.6) | 199/380 (52.4) |
| Adult | 182 (36.7) | 8/16 * (50) | 23/61 (37.7) | 16/34 * (47.1) | 135/380 * (35.5) |
| Senior | 79 (15.9) | 6/16 * (37.5) | 15/61* (24.6) | 12/34 * (35.3) | 46/380 * (12.1) |
| Not known | 5 (1) | ||||
| Lifestyle | |||||
| Indoor | 166 (33.5) | 3/16 (18.75) | 21/60 (35) | 9/34 (26.5) | 133/384 (34.6) |
| Outdoor | 328 (66.1) | 13/16 (81.25) | 39/60 (65) | 25/34 (73.5) | 251/384 (65.4) |
| Not known | 2 (0.4) | ||||
| Clinical status | |||||
| Apparently healthy | 94 (18.9) | 1/16 (6.25) | 8/61 (13.1) | 3/34 (8.8) | 82/385 (21.3) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 367 (74) | 15/16 (93.7) | 51/61 (83.6) | 31/34 (91.2) | 270/385 (70.1) |
| Other signs | 35 (7.1) | 0/16 | 2/61 (3.3) | 0/34 | 33/385 (8.6) |
DSH: domestic shorthair; young ≤ 24 months, adult 25–96 months, senior > 96 months; FeL: feline leishmaniosis; * = significant difference.
Table 3.
p-value, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the significant differences concerning signalment, history, and clinical examination.
Table 3.
p-value, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the significant differences concerning signalment, history, and clinical examination.
| Signalment, History, and Clinical Data | p | OR | 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Male | Li−FIV+ vs. Li+FIV− | 0.0333 | 2.64 | 1.13–6.11 |
| Female | Li−FIV+ vs. Li−FIV− | 0.0063 | 2.75 | 1.33–5.60 |
| Li+FIV+ vs. Li−FIV− | 0.0350 | 3.30 | 1.11–8.67 | |
| Age group | ||||
| Young | Li+FIV+ vs. Li−FIV− ° | 0.0190 | 5.90 | 1.42–27.83 |
| Adult | Li−FIV+ vs. Li−FIV− ° | 0.0036 | 3.93 | 1.53–9.92 |
| Senior | Li+FIV+ vs. Li−FIV− # | 0.0012 | 12.98 | 3.08–63.97 |
| Li+FIV− vs. Li−FIV− # | 0.0095 | 2.82 | 1.34–5.87 | |
| Li−FIV+ vs. Li-FIV−# | <0.0001 | 8.65 | 3.09–23.97 | |
° adult vs. young; # senior vs. young.
Table 4.
Median (minimum–maximum) (25° percentile; 75° percentile) of complete blood count (CBC) values of cats classified according to their infection patterns considered (Li+FIV+; Li+FIV−; Li−FIV+; Li−FIV−).
Table 4.
Median (minimum–maximum) (25° percentile; 75° percentile) of complete blood count (CBC) values of cats classified according to their infection patterns considered (Li+FIV+; Li+FIV−; Li−FIV+; Li−FIV−).
| CBC Parameters | Li+FIV+ | Li+FIV− | Li−FIV+ | Li−FIV− |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red blood cells (M/µL) | 7.92 | 7.39 * | 7.17 * | 8.31 * |
| (4–9.75) | (3.78–11.81) | (2.03–17.41) | (2.42–16.78) | |
| [5.49–9.08] | [5.92–9.02] | [6.01–8.9] | [7.11–9.38] | |
| Hematocrit (%) | 30.45 | 31.4 | 32.85 | 34.4 |
| (16–41.1) | (14.8–49.7) | (9.8–73.4) | (10.1–82.4) | |
| [22.95–36.5] | [26.95–36.75] | [25.78–38.68] | [29.15–38.6] | |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 10.65 | 10.5 | 10.1 * | 11.3 * |
| (6.3–12.6) | (4.8–16.3) | (3.4–22.4) | (3.4–22.8) | |
| [7.65–12.38] | [8.2–12.1] | [8.5–11.35] | [9.5–12.85] | |
| MCV (fL) | 39.8 | 40.8 | 42.6 | 40.8 |
| (34–58) | (32.9–61.4) | (31–61.6) | (24.9–64.1) | |
| [38.05–42.03] | [39.1–42.8] | [37.08–49.93] | [37.8–43.75] | |
| MCHC (g/dL) | 34 * | 33.9 * | 30.65 * | 33.4 * |
| (30.2–47.8) | (26.5–40.2) | (26–42.3) | (14.1–68.5) | |
| [32.23–36.55] | [31.6–34.85] | [28.85–34.23] | [31.1–34.9] | |
| White blood cells (K/µL) | 12.48 | 11.87 | 13.72 | 11.77 |
| (4.24–25.9) | (3.4–56.85) | (7.19–32.01) | (0.1–74.96) | |
| [8.13–16.31] | [8.61–16.46] | [9.95–19.58] | [8.42–16.26] | |
| Neutrophils (K/µL) | 7.91 | 6.57 | 8.34 | 6.85 |
| (2.07–19.86) | (1.42–41.1) | (2.98–27.85) | (0.02–70.92) | |
| [4.86–11.4] | [4.3–10.43] | [5.89–12] | [4.51–10.88] | |
| Lymphocytes (K/µL) | 2.68 | 3.24 | 3.11 | 2.96 |
| (0.72–8.5) | (0.76–11.75) | (0.14–13.14) | (0.05–14.12) | |
| [1.85–4.91] | [2.43–4.29] | [2.12–4.24] | [2.15–4.32] | |
| Monocytes (K/µL) | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.37 |
| (0.12–1.07) | (0.06–5.39) | (0–1.68) | (0–52) | |
| [0.28–0.87] | [0.28–0.81] | [0.34–0.75] | [0.25–0.56] | |
| Eosinophils (K/µL) | 0.48 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.64 |
| (0–0.95) | (0–4.15) | (0–2) | (0–7.47) | |
| [0.16–0.58] | [0.37–0.93] | [0.2–0.9] | [0.36–0.96] | |
| Basophils (K/µL) | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| (0–0.07) | (0–0.31) | (0–0.18) | (0–0.63) | |
| [0.01–0.04] | [0.04–0.1] | [0.02–0.08] | [0.03–0.09] | |
| Platelets (K/µL) | 367 | 297 | 336.5 | 276 |
| (151–641) | (3–670) | (9–1051) | (0–844) | |
| [224–525] | [212–407.5] | [227–496.3] | [172–376] |
* = significant difference; MCV = mean cell volume; MCHC = mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration.
Table 5.
p-values for the significant differences concerning CBC values.
| CBC Parameters | p |
|---|---|
| Red blood cells (M/ µL) | Li+FIV− vs. Li−FIV− = 0.0248 Li−FIV+ vs. Li-FIV− = 0.0392 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | Li−FIV+ vs. Li−FIV− = 0.0249 Li+FIV− vs. Li−FIV− = 0.0086 ° |
| MCHC (g/dL) | Li−FIV+ vs. Li+FIV+ = 0.0486 Li−FIV+ vs. Li+FIV− = 0.0418 Li−FIV+ vs. Li−FIV− = 0.0168 |
° p-value obtained when only anemic cats were considered; MCHC = mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration.
Table 6.
Prevalence of different types of anemia (n (%)) of cats classified according to their infection pattern (Li+FIV+; Li+FIV−; Li−FIV+; Li−FIV−).
Table 6.
Prevalence of different types of anemia (n (%)) of cats classified according to their infection pattern (Li+FIV+; Li+FIV−; Li−FIV+; Li−FIV−).
| Type of Anemia | Li+FIV+ | Li+FIV− | Li−FIV+ | Li−FIV− |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | 4/6 (66.7) | 14/20 (70) | 11/15 (73.3) | 97/110 (88.2) |
| Moderate | 2/6 (33.3) | 6/20 * (30) | 1/15 (6.7) | 10/110 * (9.1) |
| Severe | 0/6 | 0/20 | 3/15 * (20) | 3/110 * (2.7) |
| Non-regenerative | 6/6 (100) | 15/20 (75) | 12/15 (80) | 102/110 (92.7) |
| Regenerative | 0/6 | 5/20 (25) | 3/15 (20) | 6/110 (5.4) |
| Missing data | 0/6 | 0 | 0/15 | 2/110 (1.8) |
| Microcytic hypochromic | 0/6 | 0/20 | 0/15 | 0/110 |
| Microcytic normochromic | 0/6 | 2/20 (10) | 3/15 (20) | 17/110 (15.4) |
| Normocytic hypochromic | 0/6 | 2/20 (10) | 1/15 (6.7) | 4/110 (3.6) |
| Normocytic normochromic | 4/6 (66.7) | 14/20 (70) | 5/15 (33.3) | 68/110 (61.8) |
| Macrocytic hypochromic | 0/6 | 0/20 | 3/15 (20) | 3/110 (2.7) |
| Macrocytic normochromic | 0/6 | 0/20 | 1/15 (6.7) | 1/110 (0.9) |
| Microcytic ° | 1/6 (16.7) | 1/20 (5) | 1/15 (6.7) | 10/110 (9.1) |
| Normocytic ° | 1/6 (16.7) | 1/20 (5) | 1/15 (6.7) | 7/110 (6.4) |
* Significant difference; ° incomplete classification of sample because of mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration value over upper reference level.
Table 7.
p-value, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the significant differences concerning the types of anemia.
Table 7.
p-value, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the significant differences concerning the types of anemia.
| Type of Anemia | p | OR | 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | Li+FIV− vs. Li−FIV− ° | 0.0206 | 4.16 | 1.21–13.65 |
| Moderate | ||||
| Severe | Li−FIV+ vs. Li−FIV− # | 0.0240 | 8.82 | 1.82–40.03 |
| Hypochromic | Li−FIV+ vs. Li−FIV− | 0.0282 | 5.46 | 1.52–19.48 |
| Normochromic | ||||
| Microcytic | Li−FIV+ vs. Li−FIV− ^ | 0.0058 | 11.29 | 2.68–43.78 |
| Normocytic | ||||
| Macrocytic | Li−FIV+ vs. Li−FIV− & | 0.0410 | 6.75 | 1.38–38.52 |
° mild vs. moderate; # mild vs. severe; ^ macrocytic vs. normocytic; & macrocytic vs. microcytic.
Table 8.
Prevalence of complete blood count (CBC) abnormalities (n (%)) in total enrolled cats (total) and of cats classified according to their infection pattern (Li+FIV+; Li+FIV−; Li−FIV+; Li−FIV−).
Table 8.
Prevalence of complete blood count (CBC) abnormalities (n (%)) in total enrolled cats (total) and of cats classified according to their infection pattern (Li+FIV+; Li+FIV−; Li−FIV+; Li−FIV−).
| CBC Abnormalities | Total § | Li+FIV+ # | Li+FIV− # | Li−FIV+ # | Li−FIV− # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia | 151/496 (30.4) | 6/16 (37.5) | 20/60 (33.3) | 15/33 (45.4) | 110/382 (28.8) |
| Erythrocytosis | 5/496 (1) | 0/10 | 1/41 (2.4) | 1/19 (5.3) | 3/275 (1.1) |
| Leukopenia | 3/493 (0.6) | 0/13 | 0/47 | 0/23 | 3/298 (1) |
| Leukocytosis | 112/493 (22.7) | 3/16 (18.7) | 14/61 (22.9) | 11/34 (32.3) | 84/379 (22.2) |
| Neutropenia | 26/492 (5.3) | 1/10 (10) | 3/45 (6.7) | 0/22 | 22/280 (7.9) |
| Neutrophilia | 135/492 (27.4) | 6/15 (40) | 16/58 (27.6) | 12/34 (35.3) | 101/359 (28.1) |
| Lymphopenia | 22/492 (4.5) | 2/16 (12.5) | 1/60 (1.7) | 2/31 (6.4) | 17/373 (4.6) |
| Lymphocytosis | 12/492 (2.4) | 0/14 | 1/60 (1.7) | 3/32 (9.4) | 8/364 (2.2) |
| Monocytosis | 94/492 (19.1) | 5/16 (31.2) | 21/61 * (34.4) | 9/32 (28.1) | 59/368 * (16) |
| Eosinopenia | 53/489 (10.8) | 4/15 (26.7) | 6/54 (11.1) | 6/32 (18.7) | 37/345 (10.7) |
| Eosinophilia | 43/489 (8.8) | 0/11 | 7/55 (12.7) | 1/27 (3.7) | 35/343 (10.2) |
| Basophilia | 11/489 (2.2) | 0/14 | 1/59 (1.7) | 0/30 | 10/336 (3) |
| Thrombocytopenia | 34/471 (7.2) | 0/9 | 4/53 (7.5) | 1/29 (3.4) | 29/363 (8) |
| Thrombocytosis | 17/471 (3.6) | 2/11 * (18.2) | 4/53 (7.5) | 3/31 (9.7) | 8/342 * (2.3) |
| Polychromasia | 11/411 (2.7) | 0/8 | 2/48 (4.2) | 2/29 (6.9) | 7/326 (2.1) |
| Poykilocytosis | 6/411 (1.4) | 0/8 | 0/48 | 0/29 | 6/326 (1.8) |
| Acanthocytes | 2/411 (0.5) | 0/8 | 1/48 (2.1) | 0/29 | 1/326 (0.3) |
| Keratocytes | 2/411 (0.5) | 0/8 | 0/48 | 0/29 | 2/326 (0.6) |
| Spherocytes | 4/411 (1) | 0/8 | 0/48 | 0/29 | 4/322 (1.2) |
| Ghost cells | 3/411 (0.7) | 0/8 | 0/48 | 0/29 | 3/326 (0.9) |
| Knizocytes | 1/411 (0.2) | 0/8 | 0/48 | 0/29 | 1/326 (0.3) |
| Ovalocytes | 2/411 (0.5) | 0/8 | 0/48 | 0/29 | 2/326 (0.6) |
| Dacryocytes | 3/411 (0.7) | 0/8 | 0/48 | 0/29 | 3/326 (0.9) |
| Schistocytes | 1/411 (0.2) | 0/8 | 0/48 | 0/29 | 1/326 (0.3) |
| Heinz bodies | 1/411 (0.2) | 0/8 | 0/48 | 0/29 | 1/326 (0.3) |
| Howell–Jolly bodies | 24/411 (5.8) | 0/8 | 3/48 (6.2) | 2/29 (6.9) | 19/326 (5.8) |
| Nucleated erythrocytes | 15/411 (3.6) | 0/8 | 3/48 (6.2) | 3/29 (10.3) | 9/326 (2.8) |
| Morphologically activated monocytes | 18/411 (4.4) | 1/7 (14.3) | 5/47 * (10.6) | 3/29 (10.3) | 9/328 * (2.7) |
| Inflammatory leukogram | 78/411 (19) | 2/7 (28.6) | 10/47 (21.3) | 12/29 * (41.4) | 54/328 * (16.5) |
* = significant difference; § prevalence of individual anomalies was evaluated on different numbers of cats because some parameters have not been evaluated in some samples for technical reasons; # the denominator refers to the sum of the animals that presented the alteration and of that had normal values.
Table 9.
p-value, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the significant differences concerning the CBC abnormalities.
Table 9.
p-value, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the significant differences concerning the CBC abnormalities.
| CBC Abnormalities | p | OR | 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monocytosis | Li+FIV− vs. Li−FIV− | 0.0013 | 2.75 | 1.51–4.91 |
| Thrombocytosis | Li+FIV+ vs. Li−FIV− | 0.03470 | 9.28 | 1.75–40.41 |
| Morphologically activated monocytes | Li+FIV− vs. Li−FIV− | 0.0209 | 4.22 | 1.51–12.90 |
| Inflammatory leukogram | Li−FIV+ vs. Li−FIV− | 0.0230 | 3.58 | 1.58–8.03 |
Table 10.
Description of hematological abnormalities observed in total enrolled cats with number of cats (n) presenting each of them. The prevalence of each abnormality is reported (n (%)) in cats classified according to their infection pattern (Li+FIV+; Li+FIV−; Li−FIV+; Li−FIV−) and clinical status (apparently healthy, signs compatible with FeL, different/other signs).
Table 10.
Description of hematological abnormalities observed in total enrolled cats with number of cats (n) presenting each of them. The prevalence of each abnormality is reported (n (%)) in cats classified according to their infection pattern (Li+FIV+; Li+FIV−; Li−FIV+; Li−FIV−) and clinical status (apparently healthy, signs compatible with FeL, different/other signs).
| Hematological Abnormalities and Cat Clinical Classification | Li+FIV+ | Li+FIV− | Li−FIV+ | Li−FIV− |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia (151) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 1/6 (16.7) | 2/20 (10) | 0/15 | 18/110 (16.4) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 5/6 (83.3) | 18/20 (90) | 15/15 (100) | 85/110 (77.3) |
| Other signs | 0/6 | 0/20 | 0/15 | 7/110 (6.4) |
| Erythrocytosis (5) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 0/0 | 1/1(100) | 0/0 | 0/4 |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 0/0 | 0/1 | 1/1(100) | 3/3(100) |
| Other signs | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/3 |
| Neutropenia (26) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 1/1 (100) | 0/3 | 0/0 | 5/22(22.7) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 0/1 | 3/3(100) | 0/0 | 15/22(68.2) |
| Other signs | 0/1 | 0/3 | 0/0 | 2/22 (9.1) |
| Neutrophilia (135) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 0/6 | 3/16 (18.75) | 0/12 | 14/101 (13.9) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 6/6 (100) | 13/16 (81.25) | 12/12 (100) | 83/101 (82.2) |
| Other signs | 0/6 | 0/16 | 0/12 | 4/101 (4) |
| Lymphopenia (22) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/2 | 2/17 (11.8) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 2/2 (100) | 1/1 (100) | 2/2 (100) | 14/17 (82.3) |
| Other signs | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/2 | 1/17 (5.9) |
| Lymphocytosis (12) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 0/0 | 1/1 (100) | 0/3 | 2/8 (25) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 0/0 | 0/1 | 3/3 (100) | 6/8 (75) |
| Other signs | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Monocytosis (94) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 0/5 | 3/21 (14.3) | 0/9 | 13/59 (22) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 5/5 (100) | 18/21 (85.7) | 9/9 (100) | 42/59 (71.2) |
| Other signs | 0/5 | 0/21 | 0/9 | 4/59 (6.8) |
| Eosinopenia (53) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 1/4 (25) | 0/6 | 0/6 | 3/37 (8.1) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 3/4 (75) | 6/6 (100) | 6/6 (100) | 32/37 (86.5) |
| Other signs | 0/4 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 2/37 (5.4) |
| Eosinophilia (43) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 0/0 | 1/7 (14.3) | 0/1 | 9/35 (25.7) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 0/0 | 6/7 (85.7) | 1/1 (100) | 25/35 (71.4) |
| Other signs | 0/0 | 0/7 | 0/1 | 1/35 (2.9) |
| Basophilia (11) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 0/0 | 1/1 (100) | 0/0 | 1/10 (10) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 9/10 (90) |
| Other signs | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Thrombocytopenia (34) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 0/0 | 0/4 | 1/1 (100) | 9/29 (31) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 0/0 | 4/4 (100) | 0/1 | 20/29 (69) |
| Other signs | 0/0 | 0/4 | 0/1 | 0/29 |
| Thrombocytosis (17) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 0/2 | 2/4 (50) | 0/3 | 3/8 (37.5) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 2/2 (100) | 2/4 (50) | 3/3 (100) | 5/8 (62.5) |
| Other signs | 0/2 | 0/4 | 0/3 | 0/8 |
| Howell–Jolly bodies (24) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 0/0 | 0/2 | 0/3 | 1/19 (5.3) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 0/0 | 2/2 (100) | 3/3 (100) | 17/19 (89.5) |
| Other signs | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/19 (5.3) |
| Nucleated erythrocytes (15) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 0/0 | 0/3 | 1/3 (33.3) | 0/9 |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 0/0 | 3/3 (100) | 2/3 (66.7) | 7/9 (77.8) |
| Other signs | 0/0 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 2/9 (22.2) |
| Morphologically activated monocytes (18) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 0/1 | 2/5 (40) | 1/3 (33.3) | 2/9 (22.2) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 1/1 (100) | 3/5 (60) | 2/3 (67.7) | 6/9 (66.7) |
| Other signs | 0/1 | 0/5 | 0/3 | 1/9 (11.1) |
| Inflammatory leukogram (78) | ||||
| Apparently healthy | 0/2 | 1/10 (10) | 1/12 (8.3) | 7/54 (13) |
| Signs compatible with FeL | 2/2 (100) | 9/10 (90) | 11/12 (91.7) | 44/54 (81.5) |
| Other signs | 0/2 | 0/10 | 0/12 | 3/54 (5.5) |
FeL= feline leishmaniosis.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Masucci, M.; Donato, G.; Persichetti, M.F.; Priolo, V.; Castelli, G.; Bruno, F.; Pennisi, M.G. Hemogram Findings in Cats from an Area Endemic for Leishmania infantum and Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Infections. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9090508
AMA Style
Masucci M, Donato G, Persichetti MF, Priolo V, Castelli G, Bruno F, Pennisi MG. Hemogram Findings in Cats from an Area Endemic for Leishmania infantum and Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Infections. Veterinary Sciences. 2022; 9(9):508. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9090508
Chicago/Turabian StyleMasucci, Marisa, Giulia Donato, Maria Flaminia Persichetti, Vito Priolo, Germano Castelli, Federica Bruno, and Maria Grazia Pennisi. 2022. "Hemogram Findings in Cats from an Area Endemic for Leishmania infantum and Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Infections" Veterinary Sciences 9, no. 9: 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9090508
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
