Next Article in Journal
Primary Broiler Hepatocytes for Establishment of a Steatosis Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Expression of Angiogenic Factors in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Domestic Cats
Previous Article in Journal
Growth Performance, Blood Metabolites, Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality in Finishing Wagyu Crossbred Beef Cattle Receiving Betaine–Biotin–Chromium (BBC) Supplementation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Successful Treatment of Vertebral Osteosarcoma in a Cat Using Marginal Surgical Excision and Chemotherapy

1
Veterinary Medical Centre, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
2
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
3
Centre for Animal Health and Welfare, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(7), 315; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9070315
Submission received: 31 May 2022 / Revised: 18 June 2022 / Accepted: 20 June 2022 / Published: 23 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spotlight on Feline Oncology)

Abstract

:
A three-year-old male neutered Norwegian Forest cat was referred for bilateral ambulatory paraparesis and spinal pain. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a mass involving the right epaxial muscles with vertebral canal invasion and causing marked extradural spinal cord compression was identified. At surgery, the mass was debulked and a right hemilaminectomy was performed. Histopathology was diagnostic of fibroblastic osteosarcoma. Residual osteolytic lesions of the osteosarcoma were present at the level of the spinous process of the second lumbar vertebra. Four cycles of adjuvant doxorubicin chemotherapy were administered followed by oral toceranib phosphate. Neurological signs improved gradually over weeks to months and the lesion in the spinous process was no longer visible on radiographs. At one year from diagnosis, an MRI of the T3-L3 (3rd thoracic vertebra to the 3rd lumbar vertebra) spinal region and a whole-body computer tomography (CT) scan found no evidence of the osteosarcoma in the spine or of any metastasis. All medications were stopped and, at the time of writing 16 months later, the patient is neurologically normal with no signs of cancer recurrence. This is the first case report documenting the complete resolution of vertebral osteosarcoma lesions after treatment with doxorubicin followed by toceranib phosphate. The treatment also prevented tumor recurrence and was associated with an exceptionally long-term survival time.

1. Case Description

A three-year-old male neutered Norwegian Forest cat was referred for ambulatory paraparesis and spinal pain. The neurological signs had been slowly progressive over the previous 4–6 weeks.
On neurological examination, the abnormal findings were confined to the pelvic limbs. The cat sat with the right pelvic limb splaying sideways, and the hindquarters were moderately crouched during standing. An abnormal gait was characterized as an asymmetrical paraparesis worse in the right pelvic limb. Bilateral postural reaction deficits were identified; extensor postural thrust was absent in the right pelvic limb and reduced in the left, hopping was reduced in the right pelvic limb, and proprioception was absent in both pelvic limbs. Muscle tone and spinal reflexes were normal. Pain was evident on palpation of the lumbar spine, and a mild bulge was palpated in the right cranial lumbar area. The neurological findings were consistent with a lesion localized to T3-L3 (3rd thoracic vertebra to the 3rd lumbar vertebra) spinal cord segment. Physical examination was otherwise unremarkable.

2. Materials and Methods

Hematology, biochemistry and urinalysis were within normal limits, and serological testing for feline immunodeficiency virus, feline leukaemia virus, and Toxoplasma gondii (immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M) were all negative. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the T3-L3 spinal cord, a multilobulated, well-demarcated mass (3 cm × 1.5 cm × 1.25 cm) was seen in the right epaxial muscles invading the second and third lumbar vertebrae and causing extradural spinal cord compression at L2 (2nd lumbar) and L2/3 (2nd to 3rd lumbar) intervertebral space (Figure 1).
The relatively homogeneous mass was T1W, T2W, and T2W IDEAL (fat suppression sequence) hyperintense and presented strong diffuse contrast enhancement on MRI. The spinous process and dorsal lamina of the second lumbar vertebra had a thin, irregular cortex and contrast enhancement of the medulla, suggestive of bone invasion and lysis. An irregular spiculated periosteal reaction was seen at the left dorsal aspect of the lamina of L2 (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
The mass extended around the articular processes of L2/3 (right more than left) and in the right epaxial muscles up to the caudal aspect of L3 (3rd lumbar vertebra). Some lysis of the right articular processes of L2/L3 was suspected, and marked invasion of the vertebral canal was observed. (Figure 4).
The mass occupied up to two thirds of the canal at the dorsal and lateral aspects of the compressed spinal cord, from the mid aspect of L2 to the cranial aspect of L3. Expansion of the vertebral canal due to the presence of the mass just cranial to L2/3 could be visualized. Mild dilation of the central canal and subtle T2W spinal hyperintensity of the spinal cord suggestive of mild oedema was evident around the site of extradural compression. (Figure 5).
Presurgical thoracic radiographs, in three views, to screen for metastatic disease were unremarkable. At surgery, the mass was debulked, and a right L2–L3 hemilaminectomy was performed to decompress the spinal cord. The cat recovered well, and neurological signs improved in the following weeks, apart from mild spinal hyperesthesia at the surgical site and reluctance to jump. The patient was started on pain management with gabapentin 4 mg/kg twice a day and, 2 weeks post-surgery, prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg daily was added and progressively reduced to every other day. The hyperesthesia responded well to the treatment, but occasional discomfort was suspected by the owner during the following 5 months.
Histopathology of the mass revealed an unencapsulated, infiltrative, and poorly demarcated neoplasm with several irregular, anastomosing lamella bone spicules with lacunae of osteocytes. Neoplastic cells were spindle to polygonal with indistinct margins, had pale eosinophilic cytoplasm, fusiform nuclei, and two distinct nucleoli (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Neoplastic cells extended to all the surgical margins.
Adjuvant chemotherapy comprised intravenous doxorubicin, 1mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles in total. Due to the lytic lesions in the vertebral spinous process of L2, the patient was also started on alendronate 1 mg/kg twice a week. Gabapentin and prednisolone treatments were progressively reduced, then stopped 8 weeks post-surgery due to resolution of spinal pain. Due to the persistence of the L2 lytic lesions on radiography, the alendronate was continued. Every 3 weeks before doxorubicin administration, the cat was examined and hematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis were performed. Spinal radiographs were repeated at 6 weeks and at the end of the doxorubicin chemotherapy protocol, 12 weeks later.
On completion of doxorubicin treatment, toceranib phosphate 10 mg was prescribed once every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Patient monitoring was continued every 4 and 6 weeks with clinical examination, hematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis, including urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPC) and spinal radiographs. The lytic lesions in the L2 gradually improved with complete resolution one year after surgery.

3. Results

A whole-body CT scan and an MRI of the T3-L3 spine were repeated 12 months post-surgery. On both MRI and CT scans, the only significant abnormality was a focal bone defect involving the articular facets on the right side of L2–L3, which was attributed to the previous hemilaminectomy. Specifically, no evidence of the previously diagnosed osteosarcoma was identified, and the complete resolution of the osteolytic lesions in L2 was also confirmed (Figure 8). Medical treatment was stopped, and at the time of writing, 16 months after diagnosis, the cat is clinically well and neurologically normal with no signs of cancer recurrence.

4. Discussion

Primary bone tumors are rare in cats, but osteosarcoma is the most common tumor type, affecting both the appendicular and axial skeleton [1,2]. Osteosarcoma usually affects older cats with a reported median age of 8–10 years, although young cats can be also affected [3,4]. Whether the age of the patient in this report could have influenced the prognosis is not clear. In cats with osteosarcoma, there are no reported differences in prognosis between young and older patients [3,4]. In people, young patients with osteosarcoma have better outcomes compared to older people; however, this may be related to a more aggressive treatment reserved for younger patients [5,6]. In dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma, there is no clear difference in survival between young and old patients, but interestingly, young dogs could have a worse prognosis [7]. In canine axial osteosarcoma, age is not shown to significantly affect survival [8].
Appendicular osteosarcoma has a low metastatic rate in cats compared with dogs, and amputation is often curative, so adjuvant treatments are usually not required in feline cases [4]. Axial osteosarcomas are more difficult to resect completely, and prognosis is less favorable than for appendicular osteosarcoma [4]. The mean survival for vertebral osteosarcoma treated with surgery, with or without radiotherapy, is around 6 months, and local tumor progression is the principal cause of treatment failure [4,9].
Evidence of the effect of adjunctive, post-surgical radiotherapy or chemotherapy for feline axial osteosarcoma on outcomes is lacking. Only a few case reports and retrospective studies have evaluated the role of adjuvant treatment for axial and extra-skeletal osteosarcoma, but some survival benefits have been hypothesized [4,10,11]. Similarly, in dogs, the benefit of adjuvant treatment for spinal osteosarcoma has yet to be formally evaluated, but improvement in survival with a multimodal treatment approach is likely [8,12,13]. Radiotherapy was not available locally at the time this case was diagnosed. Thus, doxorubicin followed by toceranib was used to attempt to reduce tumor recurrence. Doxorubicin is reported to achieve clinical objective response and possibly to decrease recurrence rate and increase survival in feline soft tissue sarcomas and in particular in feline injection site sarcoma [14,15,16,17,18]. Its effect, if any, in feline osteosarcoma is not known. Toceranib, a multi-kinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenic property, is effective as a single agent in a wide range of solid tumors in dogs [19,20]. One of the cellular targets of toceranib is vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR), and high VEGFR expression has been demonstrated in soft tissue sarcoma in dogs [21]. Targeting VEGFR could decrease blood supply to the tumor, potentially reducing tumor growth. Toceranib also inhibits KIT (stem cell factor) and PDGFR (platelet derived growth factor), which have direct cytotoxic effects and contribute to the anti-angiogenic effect [22]. However, Toceranib has not been proven to be effective in the local control of the disease in injection site sarcoma [22]. The efficacy of toceranib in more slowly growing sarcomas, such as feline osteosarcoma, is not yet known. The potential benefits of toceranib in feline osteosarcoma relate to its broad anti-angiogenic properties, especially in tumors with high VEGFR expression.
Bisphosphonates, such as alendronate, are a class of compounds used to treat osteoclast-mediated bone loss. These compounds are known to inhibit osteoclast activity, and also to exhibit anti-angiogenic properties and anticancer effects in vitro [23].
Bisphosphonates have multiple direct growth inhibitory effects on osteosarcoma cells through the activation of apotosis and inhibition of proliferation. Bisphosphonates have anti-angiogenic activity and direct inhibition on endothelial cells via inhibition of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) and VEGFR [23]. However significant clinical tumor response or survival improvement in both dogs and cats with osteosarcoma have never been reported.
In this patient, alendronate in combination with doxorubicin followed by toceranib treatment may have contributed to the resolution of the osteosarcoma bone lesions.
In this case report, in contrast to previous reports [4,9], the tumor did not recur, and the cat remains clinically well 16 months from diagnosis. It is interesting to note that the neoplastic lytic lesions affecting L2 resolved completely after toceranib treatment and were no longer visible on either radiographs, and later MRI and CT scan, suggesting a complete response to toceranib. The efficacy of toceranib in axial osteosarcoma in cats has never been reported, and it is possible that this drug could be beneficial in unresectable osteosarcoma or, as in this case, in the treatment of residual disease after debulking surgery.

5. Conclusions

Incomplete resection or debulking surgery for feline axial osteosarcoma is generally considered a negative prognostic factor, and survival is usually limited due to local recurrence [3,4,9]. Here, adjunctive alendronate and doxorubicin chemotherapy, followed by toceranib, are likely to have contributed to the excellent outcome and the complete resolution of the residual tumor. However, a longer follow up is needed, as late recurrence of the osteosarcoma is still possible.
Evidence gained from prospective, controlled clinical studies would be valuable to guide treatment decision-making in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G.; methodology, A.G.; investigation, V.D.B. and D.D.A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G.; writing—review and editing, K.W.L.N.; review V.D.B., D.D.A.L. and J.A.B.; supervision, J.A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for this research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study involved a client-owned animal patient and followed the internationally recognized high standards (best practice) of individual veterinary clinical patient care. Ethical approval from a committee was therefore not needed.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the owner of the animal described in this case report for the procedures undertaken.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank May P. Y. Tse for her expertise in pathology and contribution to the images in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors state that there has been no conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Dorn, C.R.; Taylor, D.O.N.; Frye, F.L.; Hibbard, H.H. Survey of Animal Neoplasms in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California. i. Methodology and Description of Cases. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1968, 40, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, S.-K.; Dorfman, H.D.; Patnaik, A.K. Primary and Secondary Bone Tumours in the Cat. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1974, 15, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dimopoulou, M.; Kirpensteijn, J.; Moens, H.; Kik, M. Histologic Prognosticators in Feline Osteosarcoma: A Comparison with Phenotypically Similar Canine Osteosarcoma. Vet. Surg. 2008, 37, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Heldmann, E.; Anderson, M.A.; Wagner-Mann, C. Feline Osteosarcoma: 145 Cases (1990–1995). J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 2000, 36, 518–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Grimer, R.J.; Cannon, S.R.; Taminiau, A.M.; Bielack, S.; Kempf-Bielack, B.; Windhager, R.; Dominkus, M.; Saeter, G.; Bauer, H.; Meller, I.; et al. Osteosarcoma over the Age of Forty. Eur. J. Cancer 2003, 39, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tsuchie, H.; Emori, M.; Nagasawa, H.; Miyakoshi, N.; Murahashi, Y.; Shimizu, J.; Mizushima, E.; Yamashita, T.; Shimada, Y. Prognosis of Primary Osteosarcoma in Elderly Patients: A Comparison between Young and Elderly Patients. Med. Princ. Pract. 2019, 28, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Spodnick, G.J.; Berg, J.; Rand, W.M.; Schelling, S.H.; Couto, G.; Harvey, H.J.; Henderson, R.A.; MacEwen, G.; Mauldin, N.; McCaw, D.L. Prognosis for Dogs with Appendicular Osteosarcoma Treated by Amputation Alone: 162 Cases (1978–1988). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1992, 200, 995–999. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Dixon, A.; Chen, A.; Rossmeisl, J.H.; Sturges, B.; Vernau, K.; Levine, J.M.; Otamendi, A.; Early, P.; Partnow, A.; Curtis, L.; et al. Surgical Decompression, with or without Adjunctive Therapy, for Palliative Treatment of Primary Vertebral Osteosarcoma in Dogs. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2019, 17, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rossmeisl, J.H.; Lanz, O.I.; Waldron, D.R.; Shires, P.K.; Zimmerman, K.L.; Sego, L.H. Surgical Cytoreduction for the Treatment of Non-Lymphoid Vertebral and Spinal Cord Neoplasms in Cats: Retrospective Evaluation of 26 Cases (1990–2005). Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2006, 4, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dhaliwal, R.S.; Johnson, T.O.; Kitchell, B.E. Primary Extraskeletal Hepatic Osteosarcoma in a Cat. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2003, 222, 340–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Spugnini, E.P.; Ruslander, D.; Bartolazzi, A. Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma in a Cat. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2001, 219, 60–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dernell, W.S.; van Vechten, B.J.; Straw, R.C.; LaRue, S.M.; Powers, B.E.; Withrow, S.J. Outcome Following Treatment of Vertebral Tumors in 20 Dogs (1986–1995). J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 2000, 36, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Walter, C.U.; Dernell, W.S.; LaRue, S.M.; Lana, S.E.; Lafferty, M.H.; LaDue, T.A.; Withrow, S.J. Curative-Intent Radiation Therapy as a Treatment Modality for Appendicular and Axial Osteosarcoma: A Preliminary Retrospective Evaluation of 14 Dogs with the Disease. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2005, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hahn, K.A.; Endicott, M.M.; King, G.K.; Harris-King, F.D. Evaluation of Radiotherapy Alone or in Combination with Doxorubicin Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Cats with Incompletely Excised Soft Tissue Sarcomas: 71 Cases (1989–1999). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2007, 231, 742–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Poirier, V.J.; Thamm, D.H.; Kurzman, I.D.; Jeglum, K.A.; Chun, R.; Obradovich, J.E.; O’Brien, M.; Fred, R.M.; Phillips, B.S.; Vail, D.M. Liposome-Encapsulated Doxorubicin (Doxil) and Doxorubicin in the Treatment of Vaccine-Associated Sarcoma in Cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2002, 16, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barber, L.G.; Sørenmo, K.U.; Cronin, K.L.; Shofer, F.S. Combined Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy for Nonresectable Feline Fibrosarcoma. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 2000, 36, 416–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Troedson, K.; Hossann, M.; Hirschberger, J.; Ratzlaff, C.; Baer, S.; Meyer-Lindenberg, A.; Winger, K.; Wess, G.; Doerfelt, R.; Schweiger, M.; et al. Neoadjuvant Therapy of Locally Advanced Feline Injection Site Sarcoma with Thermosensitive Doxorubicin-Containing Phosphatidyldiglycerol Liposomes or Free Doxorubicin in Combination with Regional Hyperthermia. In Proceedings of the 28. Jahrestagung der FG “Innere Medizin und Klinische Labordiagnostik” der DVG (InnLab)—Teil 1: Vorträge, Online, 28–29 January 2020; Volume 48. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bray, J.; Polton, G. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Anatomical Resection of Feline Injection-Site Sarcoma: Results in 21 Cats. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2016, 14, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Frezoulis, P.; Harper, A. The Role of Toceranib Phosphate in Dogs with Non-Mast Cell Neoplasia: A Systematic Review. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2022, 20, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. London, C.; Mathie, T.; Stingle, N.; Clifford, C.; Haney, S.; Klein, M.K.; Beaver, L.; Vickery, K.; Vail, D.M.; Hershey, B.; et al. Preliminary Evidence for Biologic Activity of Toceranib Phosphate (Palladia®) in Solid Tumours. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2012, 10, 194–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Al-Dissi, A.N.; Haines, D.M.; Singh, B.; Kidney, B.A. Immunohistochemical Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor in Canine Cutaneous Fibrosarcomas. J. Comp. Pathol. 2009, 141, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Holtermann, N.; Kiupel, M.; Hirschberger, J. The Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Toceranib in Feline Injection Site Sarcoma: Efficacy and Side Effects. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2017, 15, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ohba, T.; Cates, J.M.; Cole, H.A.; Slosky, D.A.; Haro, H.; Ichikawa, J.; Ando, T.; Schwartz, H.S.; Schoenecker, J.G. Pleiotropic effects of bisphosphonates on osteosarcoma. Bone 2014, 63, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Right para-sagittal pre-contrast T1W image of the mass showing the T1W hyperintense mass in the right epaxial muscle dorsal to L2 and L3 (blue arrows).
Figure 1. Right para-sagittal pre-contrast T1W image of the mass showing the T1W hyperintense mass in the right epaxial muscle dorsal to L2 and L3 (blue arrows).
Vetsci 09 00315 g001
Figure 2. Post-contrast transverse T1W image showing contrast enhancement, thinning, and irregularity of the spinous process (yellow arrow) and dorsal lamina of L2 together with the invasion of the vertebral canal by the mass (blue arrows).
Figure 2. Post-contrast transverse T1W image showing contrast enhancement, thinning, and irregularity of the spinous process (yellow arrow) and dorsal lamina of L2 together with the invasion of the vertebral canal by the mass (blue arrows).
Vetsci 09 00315 g002
Figure 3. Post-contrast dorsal T1W image showing the contrast enhancement of the lamina of L2 in the middle of the mass (blue arrow).
Figure 3. Post-contrast dorsal T1W image showing the contrast enhancement of the lamina of L2 in the middle of the mass (blue arrow).
Vetsci 09 00315 g003
Figure 4. Post-contrast transverse T1W image showing the lysis of the right articular processes of L2/3 (blue arrow), expansion of the mass in the vertebral canal, and severe flattening of the spinal cord (yellow arrowhead).
Figure 4. Post-contrast transverse T1W image showing the lysis of the right articular processes of L2/3 (blue arrow), expansion of the mass in the vertebral canal, and severe flattening of the spinal cord (yellow arrowhead).
Vetsci 09 00315 g004
Figure 5. Sagittal T2W image of the spine showing the compression of the spinal cord by the extradural mass, which invades the dorsal lamina and spinous process of L2 (blue arrow). Note the dilation of the central canal and the hyperintensity of the spinal cord around the mass.
Figure 5. Sagittal T2W image of the spine showing the compression of the spinal cord by the extradural mass, which invades the dorsal lamina and spinous process of L2 (blue arrow). Note the dilation of the central canal and the hyperintensity of the spinal cord around the mass.
Vetsci 09 00315 g005
Figure 6. Histologic findings of the vertebral body mass. Neoplastic spindle cells are forming disorganized streams from fine to occasional dense fibrovascular stroma. Hematoxylin and eosin stain (×100 magnification).
Figure 6. Histologic findings of the vertebral body mass. Neoplastic spindle cells are forming disorganized streams from fine to occasional dense fibrovascular stroma. Hematoxylin and eosin stain (×100 magnification).
Vetsci 09 00315 g006
Figure 7. Histologic findings of the vertebral body mass. Occasional multinucleated cells (red arrows) and osteoid islands (black arrows) are noted. Hematoxylin and eosin stain (×400 magnification).
Figure 7. Histologic findings of the vertebral body mass. Occasional multinucleated cells (red arrows) and osteoid islands (black arrows) are noted. Hematoxylin and eosin stain (×400 magnification).
Vetsci 09 00315 g007
Figure 8. Sagittal T2W image of the spinal cord performed on 22 January 2022 showing no extradural and no epaxial mass.
Figure 8. Sagittal T2W image of the spinal cord performed on 22 January 2022 showing no extradural and no epaxial mass.
Vetsci 09 00315 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giuliano, A.; De Busscher, V.; Lu, D.D.A.; Ng, K.W.L.; Beatty, J.A. Successful Treatment of Vertebral Osteosarcoma in a Cat Using Marginal Surgical Excision and Chemotherapy. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9070315

AMA Style

Giuliano A, De Busscher V, Lu DDA, Ng KWL, Beatty JA. Successful Treatment of Vertebral Osteosarcoma in a Cat Using Marginal Surgical Excision and Chemotherapy. Veterinary Sciences. 2022; 9(7):315. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9070315

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giuliano, Antonio, Virginie De Busscher, Diane D. A. Lu, Karen W. L. Ng, and Julia A. Beatty. 2022. "Successful Treatment of Vertebral Osteosarcoma in a Cat Using Marginal Surgical Excision and Chemotherapy" Veterinary Sciences 9, no. 7: 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9070315

APA Style

Giuliano, A., De Busscher, V., Lu, D. D. A., Ng, K. W. L., & Beatty, J. A. (2022). Successful Treatment of Vertebral Osteosarcoma in a Cat Using Marginal Surgical Excision and Chemotherapy. Veterinary Sciences, 9(7), 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9070315

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop