1. Introduction
The topic of oncology in companion animals is of growing clinical and epidemiological importance [
1], with over 4.2 million dogs (approx. 5300/100,000 population rate) in the USA [
2] and 412 out of 100,000 cats being diagnosed with cancer annually [
3]. Common cancers in companion animals have been increasingly proposed as reliable and clinically relevant models of human disease [
1,
2] and the results acquired from companion animals with cancer would enable the scientific community to improve prevention strategies, diagnostic approaches, as well as the effectiveness and safety of new cancer therapy options for humans and for cancer-affected animal patients [
1,
4,
5].
Accurate cancer surveillance data are part of the foundation needed to make appropriate conclusions about this burden of cancer, to understand the role of companion animals as sentinels of human neoplastic diseases [
6,
7,
8,
9], to set cancer strategies for prevention and control, and to design analytic studies to identify causal associations between exposures and cancer risk [
10]. The first companion animal cancer registries were introduced in the 1960s [
11,
12], with several regional and country-level initiatives being developed over [
13]. Unfortunately, many initiatives have not been continued for different reasons. Currently, few registry systems for animal oncology are operating at the global level. Fortunately, the era of Big Data has opened vast opportunities for launching initiatives in this domain, such as the Small Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network (SAVSNET) [
14], the Veterinary Companion Animal Surveillance System (VetCompass) [
15] and The Veterinary Medical DataBase [
16].
This short communication aims to describe the Vet-OncoNet system, a Portuguese project inspired by the One Health vision and to report its existence. Vet-OncoNet focuses on animal cancer surveillance and is being developed with the ambition to produce evidence and knowledge not only on the veterinary oncology field, but also on comparative oncology, contributing to improve, in the medium and long term, both human and animal health.
2. The Vet-OncoNet project
Vet-OncoNet—The Veterinary Oncology Network [
17], was officially launched in December 2019, an initiative held by ICBAS in partnership with Public Health Institute (ISPUP), University of Porto and Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro University (UTAD). Vet-OncoNet’s mission is to produce scientific evidence and knowledge on animal oncology, bearing in mind the perspective of One Health, as well as to provide streamlined communication in animal oncology to veterinary clinics and pet owners. The project, initially driven by ICBAS, is an institutional initiative from the partners and was granted an internal grant intended to generate momentum. One permanent researcher was assigned, and intense networking and communication activities are key elements of daily routines. One of the core tasks is the creation of a system of registries on animal oncology, with particular emphasis on the Portuguese Animal Cancer Registry (ACR), similar in scope to those existing in the other countries [
18,
19,
20,
21,
22,
23]. Thus, some core activities of the Vet-OncoNet network are the collection, processing and analysis of data in databases dispersed across veterinary laboratories and veterinary clinical practices/hospitals.
The Vet-OncoNet developed its own information system (
Figure 1), using SQL, R and business intelligence tools. The system sets on three databases designed with the objective of collecting information from different and complementary sources. The variables collected for each database are listed in
Table 1.
2.1. Data Processing
After entering the system, the data undergoes a first stage of data cleaning and treatment that comprises editing, validation, standardization of the terms and classification (
Figure 1). Each tumor record is classified accordingly to the final draft of Vet-ICD-O classification, which classifies the tumor into a topography and a histological type (morphology). This classification system is being developed by an international group—the Global Initiative on Veterinary Cancer Surveillance (GIVCS) [
24], of which Vet-OncoNet members are included. This classification system is the canine counterpart of the human classification ICD-O-3.2, and it will allow comparability between veterinary and human cancer registries, supporting future comparative studies.
After the standardization of terms and classification of neoplasms, data is moved to the next step of epidemiological analysis and the interactive reports generation.
2.2. Data Delivery
Individualized interactive reports (dashboards) resulting from the treatment of data received, are an asset that all Vet-OncoNet partners can access permanently, via Web service (anytime, anywhere). These interactive reports allow each network partner to perform a dynamic visualization and analysis of their own data and a summarized real-time information.
3. Databases’ Preliminary Results
Vet-OncoNet has completed its first year of data recording in 2020. During that year, more than ten thousand neoplasms were reported from 6 VetLabs (70% of the Portuguese animal cancer diagnoses) and 27 VetPractices. Vet-OncoNet receives data from every animal group, however, the great majority of which comes from dogs (80.2%), with a higher proportion (60.0%) of females (
Table 2).
3.1. Animal Cancer Registry
The first database collects data from veterinary laboratories (VetLabs) producing the ACR [
25]. Each registry entering Vet-OncoNet represents a confirmed animal cancer diagnosis and is regarded as a pathology-based registry. The VetLabs partners in 2020 were: In Lisbon—DNATECH, VetPat
® and the Laboratory of Pathological Anatomy—Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon; at Porto—the Laboratory of Veterinary Pathology, University of Porto and SEGALAB; in Évora—the Laboratory of Veterinary Pathology, University of Évora (
Figure 2). Registries are localized based on postal code reported.
The first results of Portuguese ACR can be consulted in the first edition of the Portuguese Animal Oncological Registry [
25], which analyzed 8384 records from the database. After data analysis, results can be summarized as shown in
Table 3.
3.2. Clinical Oncology Registry
The data from the veterinary clinical practices/hospitals (VetPractices) are collected into a second database, independent from ACR: The Clinical Oncological Registry. The COR registers clinical information such as proportion of cancer diagnostics in clinical practice, method of diagnostic and therapeutic more frequently used, cancer staging and outcome of cases.
The first results from COR show that cytology is the most frequent method of diagnosis (40.3%), followed by histopathology (35.6%) and in combination accounted for 11.5%. Even with the high variability and heterogeneity in clinical records between Vet Practices, and problems associated with the lack of information, two patterns could be disclosed. First, a predominance of surgical interventions over chemical-based therapies (40.4% and 17.4%). Second, a broad range in the adherence of animal owners to cancer therapies: from less than 30% to up 80%.
We consider the information coming to Vet-OncoNet from Vet Practices extremely important. This information allows understanding the landscape of veterinary oncology practices in the country. Only through this part of the system will it be possible to understand the methods of diagnosis, the staging procedures and its results, as well as treatments and the respective outcomes. Obtaining more solid evidence from Vet Practices could contribute to help veterinary oncology to progress to a new era of screening and prevention. Furthermore, it is important to understand the reasons driving owners and veterinarians’ decisions, e.g., to not undertaking or giving up therapy options, and to devise alternatives to increase access to cancer treatment in oncologic pets.
3.3. Risk Factors Registry
Vet-OncoNet created an interface to establish a communication channel to the society, with particular emphasis on owners of oncologic pets: Pet-OncoNet. The platform provides reliable information to help owners understand to better the disease in their pets, and the appropriate care to be provided. A collaboration with the Oncowaf initiative [
26] was agreed to optimize efforts. Pet-OncoNet also provides a platform to collect data regarding cancer risk factors, from an online questionnaire available at the site. The RFR is a systematic collection of risk factors from owners with (case pets) and without cancer (control pets); it will collect extensive data from the entire country allowing us, in the future, to perform risk factors-based case–control studies.
4. Vet-OncoNet and Animal Census
Vet-OncoNet is a partner of the Portuguese Companion Animal Information System (SIAC), which is the Portuguese official site for compulsive registry of pets, providing the pet national census. Dogs, cats, and ferrets are the species included in the scope of SIAC. As a partner of SIAC since August 2021, Vet-OncoNet is responsible to perform the demographic treatment and analysis of the Portuguese pet population. The Portuguese pet census is available to Vet-OncoNet, after this partnership agreement, and allows calculating population-based cancer indicators. The adoption of the animal census in our calculations will be of utmost importance and an unprecedented achievement at the pet level. The use of the animal-based risk estimates will permit us to perform comparative studies of tumor risk incidence-based on human population and dog or cat cancer data.
The partnership agreement with SIAC is of utmost relevance because it will allow for the calculation of risk-based tumor incidence for pets, and it will permit comparisons between human and animal cancer occurrence
5. Conclusions
Animal cancer registries are a fundamental tool to produce evidence of the real occurrence and distributions of tumors in animals and should be progressively implemented across countries. Vet-OncoNet is a replicable tripartite animal cancer database aligned with the veterinary reality, using business intelligence tools to optimize the process of capturing, treating, and reporting animal cancer data.
Only with the participation, commitment, and work of all our partners—laboratories, Vet Practices, and owners—it was, and it will be, possible to create a data structure and a dimension that allows the generation of sound evidence, which would be impossible to produce with the current dispersed information.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, K.P. and J.N.-R.; methodology, K.P. and J.N.-R.; validation, K.P., I.P., A.F.C., P.T.C., A.S., A.d.M., F.Q. and J.N.-R.; formal analysis, K.P., J.N.-R.; investigation, K.P.; resources, J.N.-R.; data curation, J.N.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, K.P.; writing—review and editing, K.P., I.P., A.F.C., P.T.C., A.S., A.d.M., F.Q. and J.N.-R.; visualization, K.P.; supervision, J.N.-R.; project administration, K.P. and J.N.-R.; funding acquisition, J.N.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research is funded by ICBAS—Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Vet-OncoNet ethics approval was obtained from the Animal Welfare Ethics Committee (ORBEA) of the School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences—ICBAS, of the University of Porto (P310/2019/ORBEA).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
The Vet-OncoNet Network Coordination Group thanks all VetPractices and VetLabs partners involved in this pioneering initiative. It also thanks all the help of the partner entities: Magazine Veterinária Atual, Direção Geral de Alimentação e Veterinária (DGAV), Sindicato Nacional dos Médicos Veterinários (SNMV) and Associação Portuguesa de Médicos Veterinários Especialistas em Animais de Companhia (APMVEAC). Special thanks to the Board of Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), in particular to Henrique Cyrne de Carvalho, and Instituto de Saúde Pública from University of Porto (ISPUP) who believed in the importance of creating an animal cancer registry in Portugal. Our thanks to Laetitia Cicchelero, who devised the Oncowaf website, our partner in Pet-OncoNet.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to report.
References
- LeBlanc, A.K.; Mazcko, C.N. Improving human cancer therapy through the evaluation of pet dogs. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2020, 20, 727–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schiffman, J.D.; Breen, M. Comparative oncology: What dogs and other species can teach us about humans with cancer. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 370, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- MacVean, D.W.; Monlux, A.W.; Anderson, P.S., Jr.; Silberg, S.L.; Roszel, J.F. Frequency of canine and feline tumors in a defined population. Vet. Pathol. 1978, 15, 700–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gingrich, A.A.; Modiano, J.F.; Canter, R.J. Characterization and Potential Applications of Dog Natural Killer Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- LeBlanc, A.K.; Breen, M.; Choyke, P.; Dewhirst, M.; Fan, T.M.; Gustafson, D.L.; Helman, L.J.; Kastan, M.B.; Knapp, D.W.; Levin, W.J.; et al. Perspectives from man’s best friend: National Academy of Medicine’s Workshop on Comparative Oncology. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 324–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pastorinho, M.R.; Sousa, A.C. Pets as Sentinels, Forecasters and Promoters of Human Health, 1st ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; p. 375. [Google Scholar]
- Rabinowitz, P.; Scotch, M.; Conti, L. Human and animal sentinels for shared health risks. Vet. Ital. 2009, 45, 23–24. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Reif, J.S. Animal sentinels for environmental and public health. Public Health Rep. 2011, 126 (Suppl. 1), 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schmidt, P.L. Companion animals as sentinels for public health. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2009, 39, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Butler, L.M.; Bonnett, B.N.; Page, R. Epidemiology and the Evidence-Based Medicine Approach. In Withrow and MacEwen’s Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 5th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 81–97. [Google Scholar]
- Dorn, C.R.; Taylor, D.O.; Frye, F.L.; Hibbard, H.H. Survey of animal neoplasms in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California. I. Methodology and description of cases. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1968, 40, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Dorn, C.R.; Taylor, D.O.; Schneider, R.; Hibbard, H.H.; Klauber, M.R. Survey of animal neoplasms in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California. II. Cancer morbidity in dogs and cats from Alameda County. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1968, 40, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Nodtvedt, A.; Berke, O.; Bonnett, B.N.; Bronden, L. Current status of canine cancer registration—Report from an international workshop. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2012, 10, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- BSAVA. Small Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network (SAVSNET). Available online: https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/savsnet/ (accessed on 18 October 2021).
- Royal Veterinary College. The Veterinary Companion Animal Surveillance System (VetCompass). Available online: https://www.vetcompass.org/ (accessed on 18 October 2021).
- National Cancer Institute; College of Veterinary Medicine-University of Missouri. The Veterinary Medical DataBase. Available online: https://vmdb.org/ (accessed on 18 October 2021).
- ICBAS—Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar. Vet-OncoNet, Veterinary Oncology Network. Available online: www.vetonconet.pt (accessed on 26 January 2022).
- Arnesen, K.; Gamlem, H.; Glattre, E.; Moe, L.; Nordstoga, K. Registration of canine cancer. Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforening 1995, 115, 714–717. [Google Scholar]
- Baioni, E.; Scanziani, E.; Vincenti, M.C.; Leschiera, M.; Bozzetta, E.; Pezzolato, M.; Desiato, R.; Bertolini, S.; Maurella, C.; Ru, G. Estimating canine cancer incidence: Findings from a population-based tumour registry in northwestern Italy. BMC Vet. Res. 2017, 13, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bronden, L.B.; Nielsen, S.S.; Toft, N.; Kristensen, A.T. Data from the Danish veterinary cancer registry on the occurrence and distribution of neoplasms in dogs in Denmark. Vet. Rec. 2010, 166, 586–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gruntzig, K.; Graf, R.; Hassig, M.; Welle, M.; Meier, D.; Lott, G.; Erni, D.; Schenker, N.S.; Guscetti, F.; Boo, G.; et al. The Swiss Canine Cancer Registry: A retrospective study on the occurrence of tumours in dogs in Switzerland from 1955 to 2008. J. Comp. Pathol. 2015, 152, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Manuali, E.; Morgante, R.A.; Maresca, C.; Leonardi, L.; Purificato, I.; Giaimo, M.D.; Giovannini, G. A web-based tumor registration system for a regional Canine Cancer Registry in Umbria, central Italy. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita 2019, 55, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tedardi, M.V.; Veneziano, D.B.; Kimura, K.C.; Pedra-Mendonca, P.; Biondi, L.R.; Grandi, F.; Latorre Mdo, R.; Dagli, M.L. Sao Paulo Animal Cancer Registry, the first in Latin America. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2015, 13, 154–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pinello, K.C.; Queiroga, F.; de Matos, A.; Santos, A.; Ribeiro, J.N.; Guscetti, F.; Palmieri, C.; Soberano, M.; Momanyi, K.; Torres, J.R.; et al. The Global Initiative for Veterinary Cancer Surveillance (GIVCS): Report of the first meeting and future perspectives. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2020, 18, 141–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vet-OncoNet. Portuguese Animal Cancer Registry, 2020; Intituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto: Porto, Portugal, 2021; p. 10. [Google Scholar]
- Cicchelero, L.; Belgian Cancer Fund for Animals. Oncowaf. Available online: https://oncowaf.be/en/Home (accessed on 18 November 2021).
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).