Next Article in Journal
Isolation and Characterization Through Whole-Genome Sequencing of STEC Strains from Free-Ranging Red Deer
Previous Article in Journal
Organic Glycinate Trace Minerals Improve Hatchability, Bone and Eggshell Breaking Strength, and Mineral Uptake During Late Laying Cycle in Layer Breeders
Previous Article in Special Issue
Trypanosomosis by Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) vivax in Ruminants in Brazil: Epidemiology, Clinical Signs, Pathology, Diagnosis, and Control
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Acute Immune Response in Sheep Following Immunization with Toxoplasma gondii Tachyzoites or Parasite-Derived Glycoconjugates

by
Patrícia Oliveira Meira-Santos
1,
Gabriela Cruz Piedade
2,
Maria Tereza Guedes
2,
Dan Loureiro
2,
José Tadeu Raynal
2,
Roberto Meyer
2,
Letícia Vicentini
3,
Luiz Soares
3,
Blima Fux
3 and
Ricardo Wagner Portela
2,*
1
Veterinary Medicine Department, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49107-230, SE, Brazil
2
Laboratory of Immunology and Molecular Biology, Health Sciences Institute, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador 40110-100, BA, Brazil
3
Tropical Medicine Unit, Health Sciences Center, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória 29047-105, ES, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2025, 12(10), 928; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12100928
Submission received: 15 August 2025 / Revised: 18 September 2025 / Accepted: 23 September 2025 / Published: 24 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Detection of Parasitic Diseases in Livestock)

Simple Summary

Toxoplasmosis is a parasitic disease that affects both animals and humans, posing a particular risk to sheep by causing reproductive losses and serving as a source of infection for people through contaminated meat. In this study, we evaluated how the sheep’s immune system responds after exposure to live parasites or glycoconjugated molecules extracted from the parasite. The objective was to determine whether these purified molecules could stimulate immune responses similar to those triggered by the infection. Sheep were assigned to three groups: one received a saline solution (control), another was infected with live parasites, and the third was immunized with the parasite-derived molecules. Over a period of 60 days, we monitored the production of antibodies and the behavior of immune cells in all groups. Both infection and immunization activated the immune system, with the immunized group showing significant responses even without previous exposure to the live parasite. These findings suggest that parasite-derived glycoconjugated molecules may be useful for developing safer diagnostic tools or vaccines for toxoplasmosis in livestock, helping to prevent economic losses in animal production and reduce the risk of transmission to humans.

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis is a relevant parasitic infection in sheep, with ovine meat an important source of human exposure. Accurate detection of the early immune response to Toxoplasma gondii is essential for preventing reproductive losses and improving diagnostic strategies. This study evaluated the kinetics of the acute immune response in eighteen sheep experimentally exposed to live tachyzoites or immunized with parasite-derived glycoconjugates (GlyC). Animals were divided into three groups and injected with saline solution, tachyzoites, or glycoconjugates combined with an adjuvant. Infected sheep developed specific IgM antibodies against both lysate and glycoconjugate antigens from day 4, and IgG against glycoconjugates from day 12 post-infection. Glycoconjugate-immunized sheep produced IgM against lysate antigens from day 4, and IgG against both antigens from day 12. Flow cytometry revealed a significant increase in circulating CD8+ T cells and a reduction in MHC class II+ cells on day 60 in the infected group. These findings demonstrate the early humoral and cellular immune response profiles following infection or GlyC immunization. This supports their future application in diagnostic tests or as vaccine candidates against toxoplasmosis in sheep.

1. Introduction

The phylum Apicomplexa comprises obligate intracellular parasites, including Toxoplasma gondii, a causative agent of significant medical and veterinary diseases. Infection by T. gondii in sheep is associated with abortions, stillbirths, and congenital diseases, resulting in substantial impacts on animal health and economic losses in sheep farming worldwide [1]. In Brazil, the prevalence of T. gondii infection in sheep ranges from 7% to 85%, indicating widespread parasite circulation [2].
In sheep, infection occurs through ingestion of oocysts or transplacental transmission, followed by the formation of tissue cysts containing bradyzoites, which maintain the infectious cycle [3]. The T. gondii infection is usually asymptomatic in non-pregnant ruminants; some animals can present nonspecific symptoms, such as fever, apathy, anorexia, diarrhea, appetite loss, nasal discharge, and coughing for a few days [4]. Pregnant mammals that become prime-infected during pregnancy can present an immunomodulatory response, which favors the vertical transmission of the parasite; this situation expresses the fact that the response to T. gondii can vary depending on the animal’s health history or infectious status [5].
The kinetics of the immune responses against the parasite in sheep are still poorly understood. IgM is the first antibody to be produced against the parasite, and can be detected in the early stages of the infection with T. gondii, being considered an acute phase marker of toxoplasmosis. Parasite-specific IgG is produced soon after IgM, and its production can last longer than IgM, being in this way considered a marker of the chronic phase of the infection. However, it is noteworthy that there are individual variations in detecting these immunoglobulins, since sheep experimentally infected with the parasite may not present detectable levels of IgM and IgG [6].
The cellular immune response against T. gondii is correlated with a protective immune profile. It is mediated by the interaction of Th1, Th2, and Treg cells and their cytokines (IFN-γ and TNF, IL4, and IL10, respectively), which can generate either pro- or anti-inflammatory responses depending on the stimulus [7]. Specifically, MHC I+ and MHC II+ cells can present T. gondii-derived epitopes to CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, respectively, mediating the activation of these lymphocytes; CD8+ cells are responsible for the killing of parasite-infected cells with a consequent inhibition of its proliferation, and CD4+ cells produce cytokines that orchestrate the acquired immune response to the protozoan [8].
The immunodiagnosis of the T. gondii infection is a matter of discussion among researchers. Indirect immunofluorescence techniques using whole tachyzoites and immunoenzymatic assays employing total lysate antigen have been used to detect parasite-specific antibodies in humans and animals. Still, they may present problems with sensitivity and specificity [9]. In this way, recombinant proteins are being proposed as molecules that can confer higher levels of specificity [10]; in addition, it was already described that the use of parasite-derived glycoconjugates (GlyC) in ELISA resulted in enhanced levels of sensitivity, especially for the detection of specific IgM in the acute phase of toxoplasmosis [11].
Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI), a molecule characterized by a conserved core structure of phosphatidylinositol–lipid linked to a glycan consisting of non-acetylated glucosamine and mannose residues [12], is essential for the survival of T. gondii, and GPI-anchored proteins have been implicated in host cell attachment and modulation of the immune response [13]. GPIs from various protozoa are recognized by toll-like receptors, leading to the production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin-12 (IL-12), and nitric oxide by macrophages [14]. T. gondii tachyzoites-derived GPIs stimulate inflammatory responses by inducing macrophage TNF production through NF-kB activation [15]. In addition, only T. gondii GPIs bearing the unique glucose-N-acetylgalactosamine side branch are immunogenic, and this structure is widely distributed among T. gondii isolates [12]. Given that GPI-anchored proteins are abundant on the surface of T. gondii and play a crucial role in immunomodulation [16], they represent promising targets for immunological studies.
Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the kinetics of the acute humoral and cellular immune responses in sheep infected with T. gondii tachyzoites or immunized with parasite-derived GPI-anchored proteins, intending to contribute to the development of more effective diagnostic and vaccine strategies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Thirty male and female sheep were selected through clinical examination and transported to an experimental farm. Further clinical evaluations (rectal temperature, body score, occurrence of lymphadenomegaly, mucosal integrity and color, occurrence of nasal or ocular discharges, skin turgor), fecal examinations (presence of gastrointestinal parasites’ eggs in feces), and indirect immunofluorescence assays (IFAT) for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum–specific antibodies, were conducted to confirm health status and absence of prior exposure.
Fourteen animals were excluded due to the presence of anti-T. gondii IgG, indicating previous infection. The remaining sixteen animals received preventive anti-helminthic treatment and underwent additional clinical examinations before the start of the experiments. Throughout the study, animals were maintained under semi-intensive management with daily access to mineral salt, forage, and water ad libitum.

2.2. Parasites

T. gondii RH strain tachyzoites were maintained both in vivo and in vitro. Female Swiss mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 106 tachyzoites suspended in saline. Five days post-inoculation, mice were euthanized, and parasites were harvested from the peritoneal fluid using saline solution. These tachyzoites were used for the in vitro culture.
VERO kidney epithelial cells were maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in RPMI medium (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with antibiotics (5 mg/mL penicillin, 5 mg/mL streptomycin, 10 mg/mL neomycin; Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) and 10% horse serum (Gibco). VERO cells were cultured until reaching approximately 90% confluence. Subsequently, the tachyzoites that were recovered in vivo were added to the cultures following medium replacement. Parasite recovery was performed after three days by washing the cultures three times with sterile physiological solution, followed by centrifugation at 2500 rpm for ten minutes. These parasites were used for the experimental animals’ infection and for obtaining GlyC. Also, a pellet containing 1010 tachyzoites was sonicated on ice five times for 30 s each and resuspended in saline solution to produce T. gondii lysate antigen (LA); the LA was obtained to conduct immunoenzymatic assays (ELISAs). Protein concentration was quantified using the Micro BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham MA, USA).

2.3. Glycoconjugate Extraction

Glycoconjugates derived from T. gondii were purified following the method described by Portela et al. [16]. Briefly, the 1010 tachyzoite pellet was subjected to partitioning with a chloroform–methanol–water solution (5:10:4) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by centrifugation at 5000× g for 15 min at 10 °C. This step was repeated twice on the resulting pellet. Subsequently, the pellets were partitioned with 9% butan-1-ol in water and centrifuged as described above for three consecutive cycles. The resulting supernatants were pooled and concentrated by rotary evaporation at 4 °C, 45 °C, and 85.5 kPa, generating the fraction designated F3. This fraction contains the parasite’s glycoconjugates, and protein concentrations were determined as described for lysate antigen (LA). F3 was stored at −20 °C until use.

2.4. Experimental Design

The sixteen remaining animals were between 8 and 18 months old. Female sheep underwent ultrasound examination to confirm the absence of pregnancy. The animals were divided into three groups: G1, saline control (n = 4); G2, immunized with GlyC (n = 5); and G3, infected with live tachyzoites (n = 7). G1 received 1.0 mL of sterile saline solution per animal. G2 was injected subcutaneously with 250 µg of glycoconjugates combined with 1.5 mg of saponin in 1.0 mL of saline solution, per animal. G3 was infected subcutaneously with 1 × 106 T. gondii RH strain tachyzoites per animal in 1.0 mL of saline solution [17]. All administrations were performed in the dorsal neck region. Saponin was chosen as an adjuvant since it is an adequate adjuvant for the hydrophobic profile of the GlyC solution, and it has already been shown to be a proper adjuvant to be used in sheep [18,19].
Blood samples for humoral immune response evaluation were collected from the jugular vein using Vacutainer tubes without anticoagulant on days 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, and 60 post-inoculations (p.i.). For cellular immune response analysis, blood was collected in EDTA-containing tubes on days 0, 7, 15, 30, and 60 p.i. All procedures were conducted by veterinarians to ensure proper clinical monitoring and adherence to protocols.

2.5. IgM ELISA

Anti-LA and anti-GlyC IgM levels were quantified using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [11]. Antigens (10 µg/mL for LA and 6 µg/mL for GlyC) were diluted in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) and coated onto high-binding microtiter plates (100 µL/well; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark). Plates were incubated at 4 °C for 16 h in a humid chamber, then washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T). Plates were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 2 h at 37 °C. After three washes, serum samples and standards were diluted 1:50 (LA) or 1:100 (GlyC) in PBS with 1% BSA (PBS-BSA) and added in triplicate. Plates were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C, followed by six washes with PBS-T. Anti-sheep IgM horseradish peroxidase–conjugated antibody (Bethyl Laboratories), diluted 1:10,000 in PBS-BSA, was added (100 µL/well) and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After six washes, substrate solution containing 4 mg/mL o-phenylenediamine (OPD, Sigma), 0.04% H2O2 in 10 mM Na2HPO4 and 100 mM citric acid (pH 5.0) was added (100 µL/well). Color development proceeded in the dark for 10 min (LA) or 15 min (GlyC), then the reaction was stopped by adding 100 µL of 1.5 M H2SO4. Optical density was measured at 492 nm using an ELISA plate reader (Multiskan, Titertek, Huntsville, AL, USA).
Positive and negative controls consisted of pools of 10 IgM-positive and 10 IgM-negative sera, respectively, taken from sheep bred in Bahia state (Brazil) and previously defined by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFAT). All samples and controls were tested in triplicate, and mean absorbance values were calculated.

2.6. IgG ELISA

ELISA was employed to detect anti-LA and anti-GlyC specific IgG [11]. Antigens (2 µg/mL for LA and 10 µg/mL for GlyC) were diluted in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) and coated onto high-binding microtiter plates (100 µL/well; Nunc). The protocol followed that of the IgM-ELISA, with modifications in blocking and diluents: nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 5% casein from cow’s milk, and serum samples and antibody conjugates were diluted in PBS containing 1% casein (PBS-M).
For ELISA with LA, serum samples and controls were diluted 1:400, and the conjugated antibody was diluted 1:20,000. For GlyC ELISA, samples and standards were diluted 1:200, and the conjugated antibody was diluted 1:10,000. Positive and negative controls comprised pools of 10 sheep serum samples previously characterized by IFAT for specific IgG. All samples and controls were tested in triplicate, and mean absorbance values were calculated.

2.7. Flow Cytometry

The percentages of CD4+, CD8+, and MHC class I and II positive cells were assessed by flow cytometry. Three animals from G1, four from G2, and five from G3 were selected for this analysis. Blood samples were collected in EDTA-containing vacutainer tubes on days 0, 7, 15, 30, and 60 post-injections. Aliquots of 100 µL blood were incubated with 1:50 dilutions of mouse monoclonal IgG1 antibodies against CD4 and CD8 (VMRD Inc., Pullman, WA, USA) for 15 min. Subsequently, samples were incubated in the dark for 15 min with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Rockland Immunochemicals Inc., Pottstown, PA, USA) diluted 1:100. Red blood cell lysing buffer (1:10 dilution, 500 µL per tube) was added and incubated for 20 min in the dark. After washing with 1 mL PBS, samples were centrifuged at 2200× g for 3 min, supernatants discarded, and pellets resuspended in 500 µL 0.9% sodium chloride.
A similar protocol was used for MHC class I and II detection. Mouse anti-sheep MHC class II DQ/DR R-phycoerythrin-conjugated monoclonal antibody and mouse anti-sheep MHC class I FITC-conjugated monoclonal antibody (AbD Serotec, Kidlington, United Kingdom) were added at 2.5 µL (200 µg/mL) per tube. The subsequent steps followed those described above.
Data was acquired using a FACScalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) using CellQuest software version 5.1 (Becton Dickinson, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Data analysis was conducted with FlowJo software version 10 (Tree Star Inc., Chico, CA, USA).

2.8. Statistical Analyses

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 12.0. The Mann–Whitney U test was applied to assess differences in specific IgG and IgM production and immune cell marker expression among experimental groups, with significance set at p < 0.05.

2.9. Ethical Aspects

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use in Experimentation (CEUA) of the Federal University of Ceará, Cariri Campus, under protocol number 001/2013.

3. Results

3.1. Parasite Glycoconjugate Production

The concentrations of 2.3 mg/mL and 1.8 mg/mL were achieved in the production of LA and GlyC antigens, respectively. The efficiency of GlyC extraction and purification was confirmed by SDS-PAGE (Supplementary Figure S1), and the molecular profile was the same as the one previously observed for the GlyC solution extracted using the same methodology described herein [20]. The immune recognition profile of the GlyC solution was confirmed by Western blot (Supplementary Figure S2), using serum samples with positive and negative results for T. gondii-specific antibody detection, as previously defined by IFAT, and also showed previously described profiles [11,16].

3.2. Clinical Signs and Humoral Immune Response

During the experimental period, veterinarians from the farm where the animals were allocated monitored the sheep for the occurrence of nasal discharges, apathy, diarrhea, skin lesions, and cutaneous reactions due to the inoculations. None of these clinical signs was detected.
On day 4 p.i., an increase in anti-LA IgM levels was observed in G2 and G3 compared to the control group. In G3, specific antibody levels remained elevated throughout the 60-day follow-up, whereas in G2, levels began to decline after day 25 (Figure 1A). A significant increase in IgM against GlyC was observed in G3, peaking on day 8, compared to the control group and G2; however, this increase was not sustained over time, and those differences disappeared after day 12 (Figure 1B).
A significant increase in IgG anti-LA levels in G2 began on day 12 p.i., remaining statistically different from G1 and G3 between days 12 and 60; G3 did not present significant production of IgG anti-LA (Figure 2A). IgG anti-GlyC levels increased in G2 and G3 starting on day 12 p.i., reaching a peak on day 15 in G2 and on day 12 in G3. Significant levels of IgG anti-GlyC were detected in both groups until the end of the experimental period (60 days p.i.) (Figure 2B).

3.3. Cellular Immune Response

No significant statistical differences were seen between the experimental groups for the percentages of CD4+ cells (Figure 3A). On day 60 post-inoculation (p.i.), CD8+ cell counts in the GlyC-immunized group (G2) were modestly, but significantly, higher when compared to the control group (G1) (p = 0.034, and a 1.857-fold change) (Figure 3B). The tachyzoite-inoculated group (G3) also showed increased CD8+ counts (a 1.625-fold change compared to the control group) at day 60 p.i., but without statistical significance (Figure 3B).
Regarding MHC I+ cells, it was not possible to observe significant statistical differences between the groups during the experimental period (Figure 3C). Throughout the evaluated time points, MHC class II+ cell counts in groups G2 and G3 were consistently lower than those in the control group. However, a statistically significant difference between G1 and G2 (with a 0.52-fold change) was observed only at day 60 p.i. (Figure 3D).

4. Discussion

The use of glycoconjugates as vaccine antigens is becoming more explored in the scientific literature, since it was already described that they can stimulate the production of IgM, IgG [11], and IgA [16], and they can also stimulate the cellular immune response when linked to proteins, being considered as promising new adjuvants [21]. As T. gondii is covered by GPI-anchored proteins [22], and toxoplasmosis is a disease of significant importance for small ruminants, we investigated the immune stimulation induced by a GPI-anchored protein-enriched solution in sheep. As described below, a single immunization with GlyC derived from T. gondii tachyzoites induced an immune response in these animals.
The animals injected with 250 µg of GlyC (G2) produced detectable levels of IgM and IgG antibodies against LA. The presence of IgM antibodies against whole-tachyzoite antigens is indicative of recent infection and is commonly used in diagnostic tests to identify acute toxoplasmosis. Some studies have evaluated the presence of IgM antibodies against lysate antigen or recombinant multiepitope peptides (rMEP) in humans. However, they did not analyze the kinetics of the response due to the difficulty in determining the time of infection [23].
GPIs are relevant molecules to all eukaryotes, playing a key role in the T. gondii infectious process and in the immune response against the parasite, since they are essential targets of IgM antibodies [16,22]. A protein known as SAG1 (or p30) accounts for almost 5% of all T. gondii antigens, being a GPI-anchored, immunodominant, and stage-specific antigen present in the tachyzoite stage but absent in the bradyzoite stage. It is one of the first antigens recognized by IgM antibodies in humans and mice during recent toxoplasmosis, although specific SAG1 antibodies can also be found during chronic infection [24]. Additionally, it has been observed that the primary targets of IgM antibodies against T. gondii in humans are glycoinositolphospholipids (GIPLs), which are free GPI-anchors without proteins [11]. These authors developed an IgM ELISA using purified GIPLs as antigens, achieving 95.5% specificity and 81.8% sensitivity. They also found that IgG antibodies preferentially target GPI-anchored proteins, making them helpful in discriminating between infected and uninfected individuals. This situation can explain the lack of significant anti-GlyC IgM antibody production in sheep immunized with the GPI-anchored enriched solution, since GIPLs are present in LA but not in the GlyC solution used herein [16,20]; also, it must be considered that the GPI anchor is highly hydrophobic, and can make hydrophobic interactions with the ELISA plates, exposing the proteins, and with a consequent masking of the GPI motif and lack of binding with the serum specific IgM antibodies.
Although specific IgM antibodies are the main serological markers for diagnosing acute toxoplasmosis, their levels can persist for several months post-infection [25]. In animals, few studies have evaluated the IgM response during the acute phase of T. gondii infection in sheep or following vaccination [26,27]. A previous work assessing DNA immunization with genes encoding T. gondii antigens in sheep focused on humoral immune response by measuring IgG production [28]. Therefore, our study is important when evaluating the kinetics of IgM production following immunization.
Immunization of sheep with GlyC induced significant production of IgG antibodies against both LA and GlyC. IgG antibodies against GlyC were also detected in animals inoculated with T. gondii tachyzoites. A weak specific IgG peak was found in sheep immunized with T. gondii-derived SAG1 and SAG2 proteins (both GPI-anchored) 12 days after inoculation, in a similar way to what was found in our study [29]. Corroborating our results, but in an experiment conducted in mice, SAG1 and SAG3 (another GPI-anchored protein) induced specific IgG detectable levels from 15 days after inoculation [30]. However, it is noteworthy that it was not possible to detect significant anti-LA IgG levels in sheep infected with live tachyzoites, while anti-GlyC IgG antibodies were significantly produced by those animals. This situation may be related to a limitation of sensitivity when using LA as an antigen in immunodiagnostic assays [31], to the inoculum dosage and the route of infection, or even to the fact that Group 3 received a GPI-anchored protein-enriched solution, which can lead to an enhanced immunologic stimulation. In addition, our results confirm the fact that GlyC-based immunodiagnostic assays have an improved sensitivity in the detection of anti-T. gondii IgG, as already described for humans [11].
IgG antibodies against GlyC have also been reported in humans, with increased production of IgG subclasses associated with Th1 cellular responses (IgG1 and IgG3) [16]. Although IgG subclasses were not analyzed in this study, it is possible that the IgG response induced by infection or immunization with GlyC is a consequence of the activation of the Th1 profile, similar to that observed in humans. However, it is noteworthy that the presence of T. gondii-specific antibodies alone is not correlated with protection, being mainly considered as a marker of infection [32].
In immunocompetent hosts, antibodies contribute to immunity, but control of T. gondii infection is predominantly mediated by cellular immune responses. CD8+ T cells act as effector cells, while CD4+ T cells play a central role in regulating immunity against T. gondii [33]. Protective immunity against T. gondii typically involves a Th1-type response, characterized by IFN-γ production by effector T cells; however, excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines can cause tissue damage, leading to the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines that may promote parasite proliferation [34]. Also, during the acute phase of toxoplasmosis, CD4+ T cells expand less efficiently than CD8+ T cells [35], and infected CD4+ T cells undergo rapid apoptosis through mechanisms such as caspase inhibition and with a consequent lack of antigenic stimulation, resulting in reduced responsiveness and favoring persistence of the protozoan [36,37]. This mechanism may explain the absence of significant changes in circulating CD4+ T cell percentages observed in our study.
Our experiment demonstrated a significant increase in CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood 60 days after GlyC injection, although no changes in MHC class I+ cells were detected. Previous studies indicate that direct antigen presentation by infected cells in the host tissues activates CD8+ T cells [38]. Indeed, activated dendritic cells can cross-present antigens to CD8+ T cells in lymph nodes [39]. The absence of increased MHC class I+ cells in our study may be related to these specific activation mechanisms at those tissues, since we screened blood cells.
MHC presentation plays a critical role in toxoplasmosis resolution. In mice, the MHC class I allele d efficiently presents GRA6, a key T cell epitope [40]. In humans, the influence of MHC is more subtle; for example, increased susceptibility to congenital infection has been associated with the DQ3 haplotype of MHC class II. Unlike murine models, MHC class I genes do not appear to correlate with human susceptibility [41]. Larger studies involving different sheep breeds and crossbreeds, preferably including MHC polymorphism analysis, are necessary to determine whether these molecules have a similar role in sheep.
Sixty days after GlyC inoculation, a statistically significant decrease in MHC class II+ cells was observed in peripheral blood. It has been demonstrated that T. gondii inhibits MHC class II synthesis in macrophages pre-activated with IFN-γ, affecting both infected and neighboring uninfected cells, independently of IL-10, TGF-β, nitric oxide, or prostaglandin E2 synthesis [42]. This inhibition has also been reported in various cell types from mice, rats, and humans, including immature dendritic cells, potentially delaying lymphocyte activation [43].
In mice, vaccination with recombinant adenovirus encoding the circumsporozoite protein (CS) of Plasmodium yoelii lacking the GPI-anchoring motif elicited a Th1 protective immunity. The CS protein without GPI showed more uniform intracellular distribution and was preferentially processed by cytosolic proteases, indicating that the GPI anchor may impair immune responses in vivo. Also, a preferential production of IgG2 and IFN-γ secretion by CD8+ T lymphocytes was reported in mice immunized with CS with partial or no GPI anchoring. Although GPI did not affect CS expression or secretion, its deletion enhanced B and T cell responses by altering CS intracellular distribution and processing [44]. In Schistosoma mansoni, cleavage of the GPI anchor followed by immunization with the anchorless protein induced a mixed immune response, increasing IgG, IgG1, IgG2, and IgE levels 30 days post-administration. IFN-γ, TNF, and IL-10 production were also elevated seven days after the second booster, with vaccinated mice showing partial protection against parasite challenge and reduced liver pathology [45]. In our study, the significant humoral response induced suggests that the GPI anchors present in the GlyC-enriched preparation did not impair the immune activation.
In summary, GlyC derived from T. gondii effectively induced humoral immunity, with high levels of IgG production and increased CD8+ T cell numbers in peripheral blood. These findings support the immunogenicity of T. gondii-derived GlyC in sheep and suggest their potential use as diagnostic markers for acute toxoplasmosis as well as components in vaccine development.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vetsci12100928/s1, Figure S1: Molecular profile of the GPI-anchored protein-enriched solution used in this study; Figure S2: Recognition of the GPI-anchored proteins from the glycoconjugate solution used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.O.M.-S., R.M., and R.W.P.; methodology, P.O.M.-S., M.T.G., D.L., J.T.R., and G.C.P.; validation, P.O.M.-S., M.T.G., and R.W.P.; formal analysis, P.O.M.-S., M.T.G., R.M., and R.W.P.; investigation, P.O.M.-S., M.T.G., J.T.R., D.L., and G.C.P.; resources, R.M. and R.W.P.; data curation, P.O.M.-S. and R.W.P.; writing—original draft preparation, P.O.M.-S. and G.C.P.; writing—review and editing, R.M., L.S., L.V., B.F. and R.W.P.; supervision, R.W.P. and R.M.; project administration, R.M. and R.W.P.; funding acquisition, R.M. and R.W.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa e Extensão (FAPEX) through continuous resources obtained through extension projects. R.P. (Proc. 310058/2022-8) is a technological development fellow of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This work had the approval of the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals in Experimentation (CEUA) of the Federal University of Ceará, Campus Cariri, number 001/2013, date 15 March 2013.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Francisca Soares (Laboratory of Immunology and Molecular Biology of the Health Sciences Institute of the Federal University of Bahia) for technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

BSABovine Serum Albumin
CD4+Cluster of Differentiation 4 positive cells
CD8+Cluster of Differentiation 8 positive cells
CEUAEthics Committee on Animal Use in Experimentation
CSCircumsporozoite Protein
EDTAEthylenediaminetetraacetic Acid
ELISAEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
F3Fraction 3 (from glycoconjugate extraction process)
FITCFluorescein Isothiocyanate
GIPLsGlycosylinositolphospholipids
GlyCGlycoconjugates
GPIGlycosylphosphatidylinositol
GRA6Dense Granule Antigen 6
IFATIndirect Fluorescent Antibody Test
IFN-γInterferon-gamma
IgImmunoglobulin E
ILInterleukin
LALysate Antigen
MAG1Matrix Antigen 1
MHCMajor Histocompatibility Complex
NK cellsNatural Killer Cells
OPDo-Phenylenediamine
p.i.Post-inoculation
PBSPhosphate-Buffered Saline
rpmRevolutions per Minute
SAG1Surface Antigen 1
SPSSStatistical Package for the Social Sciences
Th1T helper type 1
TNFTumor Necrosis Factor

References

  1. de Barros, R.A.M.; Torrecilhas, A.C.; Marciano, M.A.M.; Mazuz, M.L.; Pereira-Chioccola, V.L.; Fux, B. Toxoplasmosis in Human and Animals Around the World: Diagnosis and Perspectives in the One Health Approach. Acta Trop. 2022, 231, 106432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lugoch, G.; Noro, M.; Andrade, J. Meta-análise da prevalência de toxoplasmose em gatos e ovinos no Brasil. Rev. Ciênc. Vet. Saúde Pública 2018, 6, 041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vicentini, L.P.P.; Pereira-Chioccola, V.L.; Fux, B. Involvement of Extracellular Vesicles in the Interaction of Hosts and Toxoplasma gondii. In Extracellular Vesicles from Basic Research to Clinical Applications, 1st ed.; Torrecilhas, A.C., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; Volume 94, pp. 133–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hassan Abdullah, S.; Othman Dyary, H.; Ismael Dana, O.; Hasanvand, M. Ovine Toxoplasmosis Sero-Status, Risk Factors Analysis, and Estimation of Haematological and Serum Biochemical Alterations. Vet. Med. Sci. 2025, 11, e70220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Entrican, G. Immune regulation during pregnancy and host-pathogen interactions in infectious abortion. J. Comp. Pathol. 2002, 126, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Verhelst, D.; De Craeye, S.; Entrican, G.; Dorny, P.; Cox, E. Parasite distribution and associated immune response during the acute phase of Toxoplasma gondii infection in sheep. BMC Vet. Res. 2014, 10, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hasan, T.; Nishikawa, Y. Advances in vaccine development and the immune response against toxoplasmosis in sheep and goats. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 951584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Innes, E.A.; Panton, W.R.; Sanderson, A.; Thomson, K.M.; Wastling, J.M.; Maley, S.; Buxton, D. Induction of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses in efferent lymph responding to Toxoplasma gondii infection: Analysis of phenotype and function. Parasit. Immunol. 1995, 17, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, M.J.; Park, S.J.; Park, H. Trend in serological and molecular diagnostic methods for Toxoplasma gondii infection. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2024, 29, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Holec-Gąsior, L.; Sołowińska, K. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Small Ruminants: Old Problems, and Current Solutions. Animals 2023, 13, 2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Giraldo, M.; Portela, R.W.; Snege, M.; Leser, P.G.; Camargo, M.E.; Mineo, J.R.; Gazzinelli, R.T. Immunoglobulin M (IgM)-glycoinositolphospholipid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: An immunoenzymatic assay for discrimination between patients with acute toxoplasmosis and those with persistent parasite-specific IgM antibodies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 1400–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Striepen, B.; Zinecker, C.F.; Damm, J.B.; Melgers, P.A.; Gerwig, G.J.; Koolen, M.; Vliegenthart, J.F.; Dubremetz, J.F.; Schwarz, R.T. Molecular structure of the “low molecular weight antigen” of Toxoplasma gondii: A glucose alpha 1-4 N-acetylgalactosamine makes free glycosyl-phosphatidylinositols highly immunogenic. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 266, 797–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nayeri, T.; Sarvi, S.; Daryani, A. Effective Factors in the Pathogenesis of Toxoplasma gondii. Heliyon 2024, 10, e31558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Paing, M.M.; Tolia, N.H. Multimeric Assembly of Host-Pathogen Adhesion Complexes Involved in Apicomplexan Invasion. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Debierre-Grockiego, F.; Azzouz, N.; Schmidt, J.; Dubremetz, J.F.; Geyer, H.; Geyer, R.; Weingart, R.; Schmidt, R.R.; Schwarz, R.T. Roles of glycosylphosphatidylinositols of Toxoplasma gondii: Induction of tumor necrosis factor-alpha production in macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 32987–32993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Portela, R.W.D.; Bethony, J.; Costa, M.I.; Gazzinelli, A.; Vitor, R.W.A.; Hermeto, F.M.; Correa-Oliveira, R.; Gazzinelli, R.T. A Multihousehold Study Reveals a Positive Correlation between Age, Severity of Ocular Toxoplasmosis, and Levels of Glycoinositolphospholipid-Specific Immunoglobulin A. J. Infect. Dis. 2004, 190, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lopes, W.D.; da Costa, A.J.; Santana, L.F.; Dos Santos, R.S.; Rossanese, W.M.; Lopes, W.C.; Costa, G.H.; Sakamoto, C.A.; Dos Santos, T.R. Aspects of Toxoplasma infection on the reproductive system of experimentally infected rams (Ovis aries). J. Parasitol. Res. 2009, 2009, 602803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. de Jesus, I.B.; Droppa-Almeida, D.; Ferreira, C.; Nascimento, R.J.M.; Portela, R.W.; de Oliveira Silva, M.T.; Alves, M.S.D.; Dos Santos, G.S.; Azevedo, V.; Padilha, F.F.; et al. Immunization of mice and goats with Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis-derived rPTS, rRBN, and rCP40 recombinant proteins. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025, 41, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barral, T.D.; Kalil, M.A.; Mariutti, R.B.; Arni, R.K.; Gismene, C.; Sousa, F.S.; Collares, T.; Seixas, F.K.; Borsuk, S.; Estrela-Lima, A.; et al. Immunoprophylactic properties of the Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis-derived MBP:PLD:CP40 fusion protein. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 8035–8051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Giraldo, M.; Cannizzaro, H.; Ferguson, M.A.; Almeida, I.C.; Gazzinelli, R.T. Fractionation of membrane components from tachyzoite forms of Toxoplasma gondii: Differential recognition by immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG present in sera from patients with acute or chronic toxoplasmosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 1453–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gong, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, F.; Zhu, B. Polysaccharides and glycolipids of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their induced immune responses. Scand. J. Immunol. 2023, 97, e13261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Morotti, A.L.M.; Martins-Teixeira, M.B.; Carvalho, I. Protozoan Parasites Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchors: Structures, Functions and Trends for Drug Discovery. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019, 26, 4301–4322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Araújo, P.R.B.; Ferreira, A.W. High Diagnostic Efficiency of IgM-ELISA with the Use of Multiple Antigen Peptides (MAP1) from T. gondii ESA (SAG-1, GRA-1 and GRA-7), in Acute Toxoplasmosis. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 2010, 52, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rachinel, N.; Buzoni-Gatel, D.; Dutta, C.; Mennechet, F.J.; Luangsay, S.; Minns, L.A.; Grigg, M.E.; Tomavo, S.; Boothroyd, J.C.; Kasper, L.H. The induction of acute ileitis by a single microbial antigen of Toxoplasma gondii. J. Immunol. 2004, 173, 2725–2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sołowińska, K.; Holec-Gąsior, L. IgM Antibody Detection as a Diagnostic Marker for Acute Toxoplasmosis: Current Status of Studies and Main Limitations. Antibodies 2025, 14, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qi, T.; Ai, J.; Sun, Y.; Ma, H.; Kang, M.; You, X.; Li, J. Application of Toxoplasma gondii-specific SAG1, GRA7 and BAG1 proteins in serodiagnosis of animal toxoplasmosis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 1029768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Deshmukh, A.S.; Gurupwar, R.; Mitra, P.; Aswale, K.; Shinde, S.; Chaudhari, S. Toxoplasma gondii Induces Robust Humoral Immune Response against Cyst Wall Antigens in Chronically Infected Animals and Humans. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 152, 104643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, B.; Oledzka, G.; McFarlane, R.G.; Spellerberg, M.B.; Smith, S.M.; van Gelder, F.B.; Kur, J.; Stankiewicz, M. Immunological Response of Sheep to Injections of Plasmids Encoding Toxoplasma gondii SAG1 and ROP1 Genes. Parasite Immunol. 2010, 32, 671–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lundén, A. Immune responses in sheep after immunization with Toxoplasma gondii antigens incorporated into iscoms. Vet. Parasitol. 1995, 56, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cong, H.; Zhang, M.; Xin, Q.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Zhou, H.; He, S. Compound DNA vaccine encoding SAG1/ SAG3 with A2/B subunit of cholera toxin as a genetic adjuvant protects BALB/c mice against Toxoplasma gondii. Parasit. Vectors 2013, 6, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ferra, B.; Holec-Gąsior, L.; Kur, J. Serodiagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection in farm animals (horses, swine, and sheep) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using chimeric antigens. Parasitol. Int. 2015, 64, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasmosis in sheep—The last 20 years. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 163, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Denkers, E.Y.; Gazzinelli, R.T. Regulation and function of T-cell-mediated immunity during Toxoplasma gondii infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 11, 569–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ihara, F.; Yamamoto, M. The Role of IFN-γ-Mediated Host Immune Responses in Monitoring and the Elimination of Toxoplasma gondii Infection. Int. Immunol. 2024, 36, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sklenar, I.; Jones, T.C.; Alkan, S.; Erb, P. Association of symptomatic human infection with Toxoplasma gondii with imbalance of monocytes and antigen-specific T cell subsets. J. Infect. Dis. 1986, 153, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sana, M.; Rashid, M.; Rashid, I.; Akbar, H.; Gomez-Marin, J.E.; Dimier-Poisson, I. Immune Response against Toxoplasmosis—Some Recent Updates: Toxoplasma gondii Immune Response. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2022, 36, 3946320221078436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shallberg, L.A.; Hunter, C.A. T Cell Surveillance of Toxoplasma gondii: Basic Insights into How T Cells Operate in the Central Nervous System. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2022, 77, 102640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dzierszinski, F.; Pepper, M.; Stumhofer, J.S.; LaRosa, D.F.; Wilson, E.H.; Turka, L.A.; Halonen, S.K.; Hunter, C.A.; Roos, D.S. Presentation of Toxoplasma gondii Antigens via the Endogenous Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Nonprofessional and Professional Antigen-Presenting Cells. Infect. Immun. 2007, 75, 5200–5209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Goldszmid, R.S.; Coppens, I.; Lev, A.; Caspar, P.; Mellman, I.; Sher, A. Host ER–Parasitophorous Vacuole Interaction Provides a Route of Entry for Antigen Cross-Presentation in Toxoplasma gondii-Infected Dendritic Cells. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Blanchard, N.; Gonzalez, F.; Schaeffer, M.; Joncker, N.T.; Cheng, T.; Shastri, A.J.; Robey, E.A.; Shastri, N. Immunodominant, protective response to the parasite Toxoplasma gondii requires antigen processing in the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9, 937–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mack, D.G.; Johnson, J.J.; Roberts, F.; Roberts, C.W.; Estes, R.G.; David, C.; Grumet, F.C.; McLeod, R. HLA-Class II Genes Modify Outcome of Toxoplasma gondii Infection. Int. J. Parasitol. 1999, 29, 1351–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lüder, C.G.K.; Lang, C.; Giraldo-Velasquez, M.; Algner, M.; Gerdes, J.; Gross, U. Toxoplasma gondii Inhibits MHC Class II Expression in Neural Antigen-Presenting Cells by Down-Regulating the Class II Transactivator CIITA. J. Neuroimmunol. 2003, 134, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. McKee, A.S.; Dzierszinski, F.; Boes, M.; Roos, D.S.; Pearce, E.J. Functional Inactivation of Immature Dendritic Cells by the Intracellular Parasite Toxoplasma gondii. J. Immunol. 2004, 173, 2632–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ophorst, O.; Radošević, K.; Ouwehand, K.; van Beem, W.; Mintardjo, R.; Sijtsma, J.; Kaspers, J.; Companjen, A.; Holterman, L.; Goudsmit, J.; et al. Expression and Immunogenicity of the Plasmodium falciparum Circumsporozoite Protein: The Role of GPI Signal Sequence. Vaccine 2007, 25, 1426–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Martins, V.P.; Pinheiro, C.S.; Figueiredo, B.C.P.; Assis, N.R.G.; Morais, S.B.; Caliari, M.V.; Azevedo, V.; Castro-Borges, W.; Wilson, R.A.; Oliveira, S.C. Vaccination with Enzymatically Cleaved GPI-Anchored Proteins from Schistosoma mansoni Induces Protection against Challenge Infection. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2012, 2012, 962538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Specific IgM levels against (A) lysate antigen and (B) T. gondii-derived glycoconjugates. Sheep were injected once, subcutaneously, with saline solution (G1), GlyC + saponin (G2), or live tachyzoites (G3). Values are presented as means ± standard errors. Significant differences between G2 or G3 and G1 groups, determined by the Mann–Whitney test, are indicated by an asterisk (*) at p < 0.05. The box in (B) shows the period of significant differences between G3 and G1 regarding antibody levels.
Figure 1. Specific IgM levels against (A) lysate antigen and (B) T. gondii-derived glycoconjugates. Sheep were injected once, subcutaneously, with saline solution (G1), GlyC + saponin (G2), or live tachyzoites (G3). Values are presented as means ± standard errors. Significant differences between G2 or G3 and G1 groups, determined by the Mann–Whitney test, are indicated by an asterisk (*) at p < 0.05. The box in (B) shows the period of significant differences between G3 and G1 regarding antibody levels.
Vetsci 12 00928 g001
Figure 2. Specific IgG levels against (A) lysate antigen and (B) T. gondii-derived glycoconjugates. Sheep were injected once, subcutaneously, with saline solution (G1), glycoconjugates plus saponin (G2), or live tachyzoites (G3). Values are presented as means ± standard errors. The symbol “*” indicates significant differences between the control group (G1) and the treatment groups (G2 and G3) in both panels, according to the Mann–Whitney test, with p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Specific IgG levels against (A) lysate antigen and (B) T. gondii-derived glycoconjugates. Sheep were injected once, subcutaneously, with saline solution (G1), glycoconjugates plus saponin (G2), or live tachyzoites (G3). Values are presented as means ± standard errors. The symbol “*” indicates significant differences between the control group (G1) and the treatment groups (G2 and G3) in both panels, according to the Mann–Whitney test, with p < 0.05.
Vetsci 12 00928 g002
Figure 3. Percentages of (A) CD4+, (B) CD8+, (C) MHC class I+, and (D) MHC class II+ cells in peripheral blood of sheep inoculated with saline (control group, G1), Toxoplasma gondii-derived glycoconjugates (G2), or T. gondii RH strain tachyzoites (G3). Significant differences between groups G2 or G3 compared to G1, determined by the Mann–Whitney test, are indicated by an asterisk (*), with significance set at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Percentages of (A) CD4+, (B) CD8+, (C) MHC class I+, and (D) MHC class II+ cells in peripheral blood of sheep inoculated with saline (control group, G1), Toxoplasma gondii-derived glycoconjugates (G2), or T. gondii RH strain tachyzoites (G3). Significant differences between groups G2 or G3 compared to G1, determined by the Mann–Whitney test, are indicated by an asterisk (*), with significance set at p < 0.05.
Vetsci 12 00928 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meira-Santos, P.O.; Piedade, G.C.; Guedes, M.T.; Loureiro, D.; Raynal, J.T.; Meyer, R.; Vicentini, L.; Soares, L.; Fux, B.; Portela, R.W. The Acute Immune Response in Sheep Following Immunization with Toxoplasma gondii Tachyzoites or Parasite-Derived Glycoconjugates. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12100928

AMA Style

Meira-Santos PO, Piedade GC, Guedes MT, Loureiro D, Raynal JT, Meyer R, Vicentini L, Soares L, Fux B, Portela RW. The Acute Immune Response in Sheep Following Immunization with Toxoplasma gondii Tachyzoites or Parasite-Derived Glycoconjugates. Veterinary Sciences. 2025; 12(10):928. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12100928

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meira-Santos, Patrícia Oliveira, Gabriela Cruz Piedade, Maria Tereza Guedes, Dan Loureiro, José Tadeu Raynal, Roberto Meyer, Letícia Vicentini, Luiz Soares, Blima Fux, and Ricardo Wagner Portela. 2025. "The Acute Immune Response in Sheep Following Immunization with Toxoplasma gondii Tachyzoites or Parasite-Derived Glycoconjugates" Veterinary Sciences 12, no. 10: 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12100928

APA Style

Meira-Santos, P. O., Piedade, G. C., Guedes, M. T., Loureiro, D., Raynal, J. T., Meyer, R., Vicentini, L., Soares, L., Fux, B., & Portela, R. W. (2025). The Acute Immune Response in Sheep Following Immunization with Toxoplasma gondii Tachyzoites or Parasite-Derived Glycoconjugates. Veterinary Sciences, 12(10), 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12100928

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop