Next Article in Journal
European Inter-Laboratory Proficiency Test for Dourine Antibody Detection Using the Complement Fixation Test
Previous Article in Journal
Seroprevalence of Equine Leptospirosis in the State of Goiás, Brazil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Appropriate Genetic Approaches for Heat Tolerance and Maintaining Good Productivity in Tropical Poultry Production: A Review

by
Jiraporn Juiputta
1,
Vibuntita Chankitisakul
1,2 and
Wuttigrai Boonkum
1,2,*
1
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
2
Network Center for Animal Breeding and Omics Research, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2023, 10(10), 591; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10100591
Submission received: 14 August 2023 / Revised: 16 September 2023 / Accepted: 22 September 2023 / Published: 25 September 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Tropical regions exhibit a wide range of climatic and environmental conditions. Therefore, to optimize the selection of genetic approaches to address heat stress affecting poultry productivity, this article compiles the different advantages and limitations of genetic methods for readers to have information to help them decide which method is suitable for their area and with genetic methods inevitably produces more sustainable results than other methods.

Abstract

Heat stress is a major environmental threat to poultry production systems, especially in tropical areas. The effects of heat stress have been discovered in several areas, including reduced growth rate, reduced egg production, low feed efficiency, impaired immunological responses, changes in intestinal microflora, metabolic changes, and deterioration of meat quality. Although several methods have been used to address the heat stress problem, it persists. The answer to this problem can be remedied sustainably if genetic improvement approaches are available. Therefore, the purpose of this review article was to present the application of different approaches to genetic improvement in poultry in the hope that users will find suitable solutions for their poultry population and be able to plan future poultry breeding programs.

1. Introduction

The food shortage crisis is a significant concern in many countries [1,2,3]. The FAO [4] reported that the number of people affected by global food shortages has increased from 8.0% of the world population in 2019 to 9.8% in 2021, equivalent to 828 million people worldwide. Countries with a steady population growth rate, such as the Republic of Burundi, Yemen, Venezuela, and India, will be more affected than countries with declining or non-increasing rates [5]. In addition, the World Population Data Sheet [6] forecasted that the world population will increase by approximately 2.4% by 2050. As a result, food demand will increase accordingly. Meat is one of the foods that is experiencing an increasing demand for consumption. Poultry is the most consumed kind of meat, accounting for 43% of the world’s total meat consumption, followed by pork (33%), beef (19%), and lamb and goat (5%) [7]. In addition, the OECD-FAO [8] forecasted that by 2025, world meat production will likely increase by 16%, with poultry being the primary driver of overall meat production growth to support demand. However, one of the significant hurdles that could result in inaccurate forecasting of such output numbers is global climate change influencing heat stress effects. According to Copernicus [9], the global average temperature has increased by 2 °C compared to the database year 1850–1900; in particular, the environments in hot and humid tropical areas have a high risk of animals being affected by heat stress. Heat stress resulted in lower poultry productivity due to less feed intake, slower growth rate, and reduced fertility. It involves the immune system and body functions that change from routine [10]. Ultimately, if the bird cannot manage, severe heat stress can lead to mass deaths, which have widespread consequences, especially economic losses [11].
Several approaches have been used to reduce the severity of heat stress in poultry. The surrounding environment was modified using natural shading and increasing drinking water points on the farm [12]. A well-ventilated house with exhaust fans was designed to circulate air and insulation to maintain a stable indoor temperature [13,14]. Feed management techniques have been tried, such as scheduling feeding when environmental temperatures are lowest to reduce metabolic heat during hot weather [15,16,17]. Recent research highlights diverse dietary strategies to enhance chicken health and performance. Gouda et al. [18] advocate for L-ascorbic and folic acids, which improve antioxidant status and growth. Selenium nanoparticles, as noted by Lochi et al. [19], benefit body weight and intestinal health. According to Ogbuagu and Ayo [20], L-serine enhances meat quality and bone characteristics under heat stress. Du et al. [21] suggested that symbiotics can boost growth, immunity, and intestinal function, while Abbass and Abid [22] recommend using peppermint and fenugreek as natural additives to combat heat stress and improve productivity in chickens. Moreover, supplementation of vitamin E and organic compounds such as selenium and zinc (Se and Zn) in the diet increased the growth efficiency of chickens and reduced heat-related mortality [23,24,25,26]. Moreover, wet feeding was found to reduce thermal stress [27,28]. However, the methods mentioned above give good results only in the short term and do not solve the problem sustainably. In addition, some methods require a long time and a high investment budget, which may not be suitable for areas with limited investment budgets. For this reason, genetic approaches have been developed to breed poultry with increased heat tolerance while maintaining high productivity. These genetic advancements promise the future of poultry farming in hot and humid regions.
Therefore, we aimed to provide a clear understanding and guidelines for its appropriate application. This review article aims to research and collect data on the effects of heat stress on chickens and propose methods for breeding chickens appropriate to an area’s hot and humid conditions for future poultry genetic improvement.

2. Heat Stress in Poultry

Heat stress is the body’s response to its inability to cope with the environment at high temperatures [29], which exceeds the animal’s ability to regulate temperature. This situation occurs due to the balance of the net heat energy transfer from the animal’s body to the surrounding environment and the amount of heat energy generated by the animal. As a result, the animal cannot adequately eliminate body heat [30,31]; consequently, the animal’s temperature rises, which results in heat stress. Heat stress is caused by changes in the animal’s surrounding environment, air temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, wind speed, and metabolic rate of the animal’s body [32,33]. However, these effects harm the animal depending on the severity and duration of exposure to high temperatures [34,35]. Each species and age of poultry has an appropriate temperature range (thermoneutral zone), which can produce different results [36,37,38,39]. Moreover, it is the temperature range in which the animal has the lowest energy loss because it does not need to expend energy cooling or warming its body. In poultry, the optimum temperature for efficiency is 19–22 °C in layers [40] and 18–22 °C in broilers [41,42,43]. Temperatures above this range (upper critical temperature) will cause thermal stress. The stress levels can be divided into three levels: mild stress, 25 °C; moderate stress, 30 °C (there were signs of fatigue and lethargy) [12]; and severe stress, 35 °C [44]. At severe stress, chickens cannot dissipate body heat, resulting in organ function failure and death [45] (Figure 1). For example, Welay et al. [46] revealed that broilers exposed to temperatures above 32 °C exhibited diminished feed intake and body weight gain, indicating a direct temperature effect on broiler growth. Sohail et al. [47] revealed that broilers are subjected to chronic heat stress by reduced feed intake, lower body weight, and higher feed conversion ratio. In addition, several studies have shown impaired growth performance and meat in broilers subjected to heat stress [35,48]. For layers, Attia et al. [49] demonstrated detrimental effects on layers, such as reduced egg production, lighter eggs, and poorer eggshell quality. In native chickens, Boonkum et al. [50] found the effects of heat stress on reduced growth rate and genetic parameters at the temperature-humidity index of 76; meanwhile, Loengbudnark et al. [51] found genetic impacts of heat stress on egg production of Thai native chickens.

3. Mechanism of Thermoregulation in Poultry

Poultry is warm-blooded, meaning it can maintain a constant body temperature despite changes in ambient temperature [52]. Poultry begins to exhibit behavioral responses to expel excess heat, as shown in Figure 2. The cooling mechanism in poultry can be divided into four processes: (1) Conduction processes, for example, being in contact with the floor, planks, sidewalls, and cage floors inside the house [53,54,55] with a temperature lower than the animal’s body temperature, which causes internal body heat to flow along the surface. (2) Convection processes such as dilating blood vessels, observed from the darkening of body parts such as crest and wattle [56], will increase blood supply to the skin area. The skin is exposed to air and is easily carried away by wind. In addition, chickens can remove heat from the body by gular flutter [57] to allow more air to flow over the skin. (3) The evaporation process is an animal’s natural cooling mechanism based on the principle of latent heat transfer caused by the transition of water from liquid to gas to lower body temperature through a process known as panting. Heat can be exhausted from the body up to 40% of the total cooling capacity [58,59]. (4) Radiation is the heat transfer process from the chicken’s body to the environment through electromagnetic radiation [13], depending on the air around the chicken. The radiating heat capacity is also lower if the ambient temperature is high. However, if the ambient temperature is lower than the chicken’s body temperature, the radiating heat capacity is greater [60]. If the ambient temperature is above 40 °C, the chicken cannot radiate out of the body at all. Radiant cooling accounts for approximately 5% of total cooling [61].
The mechanisms for the heat stress response of the nervous and endocrine systems are shown in Figure 2. The amount of time a bird spends in high temperatures can be classified into acute and chronic. Acute stress is distinct for short-lived and frequently developing in response to acute and temporally limited stress-inducing stimuli. Meanwhile, chronic stress is characterized by protracted and enduring stress conditions that last longer. Consequently, there exists a distinct variation in the hormonal response, which can be delineated as follows: (1) Acute heat stress is characterized by a swift and immediate response aimed at priming the individual for the “fight or flight” reaction [62]. The animal is at risk due to the interplay of its neurological systems and hormonal responses. The phenomenon of stress triggers the activation of the sympathetic nervous system stimulation secretion. Catecholamines (adrenaline and noradrenaline) are secreted from the adrenal medulla. Both adrenaline and noradrenaline lead to the mobilization of various glucose sources, which are promptly released in substantial amounts as a source of energy during a response to heat stress. This mobilization involves stimulating an increased heart rate, constricting blood vessels in the viscera and skin, dilating blood vessels in the heart and skeletal muscles, converting glycogen into glucose in the liver, and dilating the bronchial tubes. These two hormones also inhibit other energy-demanding bodily processes, including digestion, growth, immune, and reproductive functions [63]. (2) Chronic heat stress, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system (HPA) synthesizes corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), and hydrotropic-releasing hormone (TRH). These hormones are then released into the anterior pituitary gland to stimulate the synthesis of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), growth hormone (GH), and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), respectively, which is the hormone that stimulates the production of corticosterone in the adrenal cortex gland, IGFs in the liver, and thyroid hormones (triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4)) in the thyroid gland. Corticosterone, insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), and thyroid hormones help make glucocorticoids, widen blood vessels, break down fat and proteins, and reduce inflammation [64]. The primary hormone in the glucocorticoid group, corticosterone, stimulates hepatic gluconeogenesis by increasing the production of enzymes involved in converting the amino acids glycerol and lactate into glucose [65]. It is essential in regulating glucose, protein, and lipid metabolism, suppressing the immune response, and helping maintain blood pressure [66]. The increase in ACTH and glucocorticoid (GC) levels also inhibits other energy-consuming processes in the body, such as growth, immunity, reproduction, and digestion [67]. GC hormone can reduce protein synthesis and decrease cell lipolysis levels, increasing fat accumulation [68]. Therefore, chickens exposed to prolonged stress may develop muscle weakness and reduced antibody production and response, impairing immune function. Animals experiencing thermal stress are also exposed to higher levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can cause lipid peroxidation and oxidative protein changes [35]. These are major causes of cellular DNA damage, fats, proteins, carbohydrates, and other molecules [69,70], called heat shock [71].

4. Effects of Heat Stress on Poultry

Heat stress negatively impacts the global poultry industry, as thermoregulatory mechanisms cause heat stress effects. The effects of heat stress on physiological, metabolic, immunological, and productivity changes in poultry are presented in Table 1, and details are shown below.

4.1. Physiological Changes

Under heat stress conditions, birds utilize various methods for decreasing body temperature, including panting, to dissipate excess heat. By panting, birds increase the airflow over their respiratory surfaces, promoting evaporative cooling through the moist lining of the respiratory tract [72]. However, it is noted that rapid and shallow breathing leads to the loss of carbon dioxide and, subsequently, the imbalance of plasma bicarbonate [71]. The disturbance of acid–base balance affects eggshell mineralization by decreasing plasma-free calcium levels. Finally, it adversely affects laying hens by producing eggs with thin shells, misshapen eggs, or eggs with lower internal quality [73]. Heat stress can lead to alterations in blood circulation patterns in poultry [62]. Vasodilation enhances heat dissipation by transferring heat from the body’s core to the skin surface, promoting radiant and convective heat loss [74]. This redirection of blood can reduce blood flow to other organs and may impact the overall physiological functioning of various organ systems [75]. Heat stress can disrupt the electrolyte balance in poultry [76]. Birds lose essential electrolytes, such as sodium, potassium, and chloride, through increased panting. These electrolytes are crucial for maintaining proper cellular function, and imbalances can lead to physiological disturbances and potential health issues [77]. Under heat-stress conditions, birds might be dehydrated if adequate water is not available for rehydration [78]. Therefore, an increased demand for water consumption is required for thermoregulation and osmoregulation [79].

4.2. Metabolic Changes

Heat stress triggers hormonal responses in poultry, such as thyroid and GC. Thyroid hormone plays a crucial role in regulating the rate of protein breakdown and responses to maintain the body temperature. During heat stress conditions, the decrease of plasma T3 and T4 concentrations was observed to decrease metabolic heat production [80]. Meanwhile, releasing GC hormones, such as corticosterone, during heat stress conditions resulted in increased fat accumulation [81]. Therefore, the heat stress conditions lead to decreased and increased protein content and fat deposition in chicken meat muscles, declining meat quality [82]. Besides meat quality, the synthesis of proteins involved in growth, reproduction, and immune function may be reduced, leading to slower growth rates, compromised reproductive performance, and decreased immune response. Furthermore, heat stress conditions induced oxidative stress in poultry [83]. ROS production exceeds the bird’s antioxidant defense capacity, leading to oxidative damage to cells and tissues [84,85].

4.3. Immunological Changes

Heat stress significantly impacts the immune function of poultry birds, leading to changes in the proportion of leucocytes in the blood and an increase in the heterophil: lymphocyte (H/L) ratio [86,87]. Heterophils are essential for innate immunity and phagocytosis, acting as the first line of defense after infection. The H/L ratio is a widely used indicator of HS, with increasing numbers found in the blood during the initial phase of the inflammatory response [88,89]. Heat stress also decreases the weight of lymphoid organs and the thymus [90,91], reducing T and B lymphocytes and decreasing antibody production [92]. Mashay et al. [73] claimed that heat stress exposure reduced the number and activities of leukocytes, as indicated by lower total white blood cell count in the heat-stressed group. This reduction may be due to inflammatory cytokine production, which stimulates corticosterone production from the adrenal gland. Therefore, the incidence of diseases caused by different pathogens increased in birds under heat stress conditions [93,94,95]. The decrease in immunity and more susceptibility to pathogens suggest a link between the nervous system and the immune system [94,96,97]. It inferred that heat stress also suppresses immune function and impairs production performance.

4.4. Productivity Changes

Heat stress can have significant adverse effects on the productivity of poultry. When poultry experiences heat stress, birds often exhibit reduced feed intake, a phenomenon known as anorexia. The decreased appetite is a natural response to reduced metabolic heat production during digestion [98,99]. However, reduced feed intake can lead to inadequate nutrient intake, slower growth rates, and reduced weight gain [100], resulting in compromised performance and overall productivity [101]. This can have economic implications for poultry farmers. Furthermore, heat stress negatively impacts the feed conversion efficiency of poultry [102]. Feed conversion efficiency refers to the ability of birds to convert feed into body weight. In addition, Nanto-Hara et al. [103] reported that heat stress also results in intestinal damage, making it easier for bacteria to enter the circulatory system, causing infection [104], which would affect nutrient absorption of an already reduced volume of feed intake. In laying hens, it can lead to decreased egg production, reduced egg size, and poor egg quality [40,98,105]. Heat-stressed hens may produce smaller eggs with thin shells, misshapen eggs, or eggs with lower internal quality [73]. Additionally, heat stress can disrupt the egg-laying cycle, leading to irregular or decreased egg production. Additionally, heat stress can negatively affect the fertility of male and female breeding poultry [106]. High temperatures can impair sperm production and reduce sperm quality in males, decreasing fertility rates [107]. Heat stress in females can result in poor egg fertilization, decreased embryo development, and reduced hatchability rates [108]. Prolonged exposure to high temperatures can lead to increased mortality rates in poultry. Heat stress weakens birds, making them more susceptible to diseases, infections, and other health issues [77,109]. Mortality rates may rise due to heat-related complications, such as heat exhaustion, heat stroke, or increased disease susceptibility [109].
Table 1. The effects of heat stress on physiological changes, immune system, and productivity changes in poultry.
Table 1. The effects of heat stress on physiological changes, immune system, and productivity changes in poultry.
ParametersEffects of Heat StressReferences
Physiological changes
Acid–base imbalancerespiratory alkalosis can occur when the body’s pH is shifted towards alkalinity due to a reduction in blood carbon dioxide (CO2) levels.Popoola et al. [71]
Vasodilationincreases skin-surface blood vessel dilatation. this enhances radiative and convective heat loss from the core to the skin.Chaiyabutr et al. [62]; Mota-Rojas et al. [74]; Hall et al. [75]
Electrolyte Imbalancesweating and pant during heat stress, losing sodium chloride, potassium, and chloride.Nawab et al. [76]; Wasti et al. [77]
Dehydrationrapid respiration risks dehydration and electrolyte imbalances due to higher water loss.Khan et al. [78]
Metabolic changes
Thyroid activity declinesdiminished thyroid hormone levels can diminish poultry metabolic rates, affecting growth and performance.Del Vesco et al. [80]
Decreases Protein Metabolism growth, reproduction, and immunity may be affected by decreased protein synthesis.Zaboli et al. [82]
Increased Carbohydrate Metabolism heat stress can elevate blood glucose levels through stress hormone release, potentially causing hyperglycemia.Kikusato and Toyomizu [81]
The accumulation of fat increasessubcutaneous fat may decrease and abdominal fat rise. high temperatures reduce adipose tissue lipogenesis, altering meat quality and egg yolk composition.Zaboli et al. [82]
Increased ROS ROS from oxidative stress exceeds the bird’s antioxidant defenses. this damages tissues and cells.Song et al. [84] Nanto-Hara et al. [85]
Immune changes
A higher H/L ratio.heterophil to lymphocyte (h/l) ratios rise during heat stress, indicating immune system alterations.Soleimani et al. [88]; Al-Murrani et al. [89]
Bursa and thymus weight decline.prolonged heat stress can reduce bursa and thymus weights, affecting lymphoid organ growth and function.Hirakawa et al. [85]; Kammon et al. [91]
Reduced T and B lymphocyte activity.heat stress reduces t and b lymphocyte function, lowering the immune system’s ability to fight infections.Honda et al. [92]; Mashaly et al. [73]
Pathogen susceptibility rises.heat stress can decrease poultry immune systems, making them more susceptible to diseases.Alhenaky et al. [93]; Quinteiro-Filho et al. [94]; Ahmad et al. [95]
Productivity changes
Reduced Feed Intakelead to decreased appetite in poultry, resulting in lower feed consumption.Rowland et al. [98]; Mazzoni et al. [99]
Reduced body weightexposed to heat stress may experience slower growth rates and reduced body weight gain.Awad et al. [100]
Feed efficiency reductionThe impairment of feed conversion efficiency results in elevated feed costs.Sohao et al. [47]
Egg production declinelaying fewer eggs of reduced size and quality.Yan et al. [40]; Loengbudnark et al. [51]; Rowland et al. [98]
Reducing fertilityimpair the fertility of breeding poultry, leading to decreased hatchability.Donoghue et al. [105]; Olusegun and Alabi [106]
Mortality risesmortality rates can rise due to heat stress-induced physiological strain.Aguanta et al. [109]

5. Genetic Approaches to Address Heat Stress in Poultry

Presently, there are four genetic approaches to reducing heat stress to improve poultry productivity: (1) the traditional method (EBVs), (2) the use of marker-assisted selection (MAS), (3) genomic selection, and (4) OMICS technology (Figure 3). Hereinafter, we will discuss each method in detail, including comparing differences in different dimensions and suggestions that may help in future decision making.

5.1. Conventional Method

Mating between high-yielding chicken breeds and native chicken breeds for the benefit of environmental adaptation and heat tolerance is a method that is widely used in many countries [110,111], but it may make purebred chickens more productive. The number of purebred chickens is steadily decreasing, which may not be suitable for animal genetic stability. At the same time, the temperature and humidity, which are calculated as the temperature–humidity index (THI), are used to assess the heat stress threshold for which performance and production begin to decline and to regress phenotypic performance on the THI value to quantify the genetic parameters of thermotolerance. The identification and selection of heat-tolerant animals is an important strategy for minimizing the effects of heat stress on dairy cattle productivity [112,113]. Thus, it is crucial to include heat adaptive parameters in the selection objective of dairy cow populations. Traditional models for describing an animal’s production performance in response to increased heat stress, known as the broken line (BL) model, assume that production does not change in the thermoneutral zone, and after the threshold point, production decreases linearly [114]. An alternative is to model the animal’s productive response using a reaction norm that uses polynomials. This approach offers higher flexibility than the BL [115]. In poultry, THI that exceeds a particular threshold for poultry often leads to significant declines in feed intake and body weight, lowered fertility, and a significant increase in mortality rate and physiological response. Boonkum et al. [50] estimated the impact of heat stress on the genetic absolute growth rate (AGR) in Thai native chickens and Thai synthetic chickens (chickens that have undergone genetic enhancement through the crossbreeding of commercial chickens with indigenous chicken breeds) and found a THI of 76. Compared to that of native Thai chickens, Thai synthetic chickens’ growth rate decreased more dramatically. Additionally, Loengbudnark et al. [51] investigated the effects of heat stress on the genetics of monthly eggs and found that monthly egg production started to decrease when the THI was 74.

5.2. Molecular Method by Marker-Assisted Selection

Marker-assisted selection (MAS) is a breeding technique used in agriculture and genetics to improve the efficiency and precision of selecting desirable traits in plants, animals, and other organisms [116]. MAS combines traditional breeding methods with molecular markers, which are specific sequences of DNA that can be easily detected and associated with particular traits or characteristics. By utilizing MAS in selecting heat tolerance genes in poultry, breeders can more effectively and efficiently identify individuals with desirable heat tolerance traits [117,118]. This targeted selection based on genetic markers enables breeders to improve heat tolerance in poultry populations more rapidly than relying solely on phenotypic evaluations [119]. Ultimately, this can contribute to developing poultry breeds better adapted to withstand high-temperature environments, resulting in improved productivity, health, and welfare in heat-stressed conditions.
At present, many genes are involved with heat stress effects (Table 2), which can be divided into two types: (1) directly controlled genes, namely, the heat shock factor (HSF) and heat shock protein (HSP) gene families; these work together to help reduce protein folding and are involved in important cellular defense mechanisms during exposure to hot environments [120]. Most of the major regulatory genes, HSF1 and HSF3, are involved in the regulation of HSPs; HSP27, HSP60, HSP70, and HSP90 are classified according to their molecular weights [121]. Cedraz et al. [120] found that HSP70 expression in commercial broilers is higher than that in native broilers during heat stress, particularly in the expression of the HSF1 and HSF3 genes. Furthermore, Duangjinda et al. [122] investigated the influence of the HSP70 genotype on heat tolerance in native chickens and discovered that the HSP70 genotypes displayed various tolerances to heat stress. It was discovered that the C2C2 genotype is susceptible to heat stress. As a result, commercial poultry breeding programs may choose to use C1C1 or C1C2 genotypes to improve heat tolerance. (2) Indirectly regulated genes from previous studies found that the HSF and HPS genes play major roles in regulating the heat response, and other genes that play a role in the regulation of apoptosis (RB1CC1, BAG3) [116,123], energy uptake and metabolism (GLUT-2, FABP1, CD36, FGA, LOXL2, GINS1, RRM2) [124,125], and immune response (HS3ST5, NFAT5, PDK) [12,126,127,128]. Several candidate genes involved in arid adaptation play a role in the heat stress response, as shown in Table 2. Nevertheless, some genes have been identified, their function in relation to heat stress has not yet been determined, such as CEP78, MEF2C, VPS13A, and ARRDC3, which may play an important role in regulating heat stress in poultry [129].

5.3. Genomic Selection

Genomic selection (GS) is a breeding approach that uses genomic information to predict the genetic merit of individuals for specific traits [137]. It is a form of marker-assisted selection that leverages high-density genotyping or whole-genome sequencing data to estimate the breeding value of individuals based on their genomic profiles. This approach has gained popularity in plant and animal breeding because it enables a more accurate and efficient selection of desirable traits [138,139]. Genomic selection has revolutionized breeding programs in various plant and animal species, leading to accelerated genetic progress, more efficient use of resources, and the development of improved varieties or breeds with desired traits [130,140]. In the context of genomic selection (GS) [141], there are generally two main types or approaches (Table 3). (1) Marker-based genomic selection relies on the analysis of genetic markers, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), to predict the genetic merit of individuals. The markers are genotyped or sequenced across the genome, and statistical models are developed to estimate the genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) based on the marker profiles. These GEBVs are used for selection decisions, and individuals with higher GEBVs are preferred as parents for the next breeding cycle. (2) In whole-genome selection, also known as genomic prediction, the entire genome of individuals is analyzed rather than specific genetic markers. This approach involves high-density genotyping arrays or whole-genome sequencing to obtain comprehensive genetic information. Statistical models, such as genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) or Bayesian methods, are applied to estimate the genomic breeding values. The models capture the collective effects of numerous genetic markers distributed throughout the genome, allowing for the prediction of breeding values based on complete genomic information. Several studies have investigated the application of genomic selection to improve heat tolerance in chickens. For instance, researchers have used high-density genotyping arrays to identify genetic markers associated with heat tolerance traits and then applied genomic prediction models to estimate breeding values for heat tolerance. This approach enables the selection of individuals with higher genetic potential for heat tolerance, leading to more heat-resistant chicken lines [142]. In addition, Bjorkquist et al. [143] conducted studies to select improved adaptability to high temperatures in broiler chickens, which are bred for meat production. By combining genotyping data with phenotypic records of broilers reared under heat stress conditions, genomic selection models have been used to predict breeding values for heat tolerance. This allows breeders to identify and select broilers with enhanced thermotolerance traits, improving performance in high-temperature environments. Genomic selection has also been explored to improve the thermotolerance of laying hens raised for egg production [144]. By genotyping laying hens and employing genomic prediction models, breeders can predict the genetic merit of individuals for heat tolerance traits.

5.4. OMICS Technology

Several omics studies have been conducted in poultry to investigate the molecular mechanisms and genetic responses associated with heat stress (Figure 3). These studies have utilized genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and other omics approaches to gain insights into the physiological and molecular changes that occur in response to heat stress in poultry (Table 4). Genomic studies have examined the genetic variations and genomic regions associated with heat tolerance in poultry. These studies have involved genome-wide association studies (GWASs) or genomic selection approaches to identify candidate genes or genetic markers associated with heat tolerance traits [149]. Transcriptomic analyses have been used to investigate gene expression changes in response to heat stress in poultry. These studies have identified heat stress-responsive genes, pathways, and regulatory networks involved in thermoregulation, immune response, oxidative stress, metabolism, and other relevant processes. Transcriptomic data have been generated using microarray technology or next-generation sequencing techniques, such as RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) [150]. Proteomic studies have examined the changes in protein expression, posttranslational modifications, and protein–protein interactions in response to heat stress in poultry. These studies have identified heat shock proteins, antioxidant enzymes, and other proteins involved in stress responses and cellular defense mechanisms. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches have been employed to profile protein expression patterns under heat stress conditions [151]. Metabolomic analyses have been used to investigate the metabolic changes and alterations in metabolite profiles associated with heat stress in poultry. Metabolomics studies have revealed changes in energy metabolism, amino acid metabolism, lipid metabolism, and other metabolic pathways in response to heat stress. Metabolites have been analyzed using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry technique (LC–MS) [142]. These omics studies have provided valuable insights into poultry’s molecular and physiological responses to heat stress. They have helped identify potential biomarkers, pathways, and genetic markers associated with heat tolerance, which can inform breeding programs aimed at developing more thermotolerant poultry breeds and improving management strategies to mitigate the negative impacts of heat stress in poultry production.

6. Challenges of Improving Poultry Genetics in Tropical Areas

Genetically improving tropical poultry presents several challenges due to the specific environmental conditions and genetic traits of the birds. Some of the key challenges include the following: (1) Heat stress can negatively impact bird growth, feed conversion efficiency, and overall health. Therefore, one of the primary challenges is to develop poultry strains or breeds that are better adapted to hot and humid climates. (2) Genetic improvement programs aim to develop poultry breeds that are efficient in converting feed into body weight or egg production. This includes selecting birds with traits such as improved feed conversion ratios, increased feed intake to get better growth, and enhanced nutrient utilization. (3) High temperatures and humidity can adversely affect poultry reproductive performance, including reduced fertility rates and increased embryonic mortality. Genetic improvement efforts need to address these challenges by selecting birds with better reproductive traits, including improved egg production, hatchability, and fertility under tropical conditions. (4) Selective breeding programs need to consider the optimum body size and growth rate for tropical poultry that align with the local market demands. This may involve striking a balance between fast growth and efficient resource utilization, taking into account factors such as heat stress and feed availability. In addition, tropical regions exhibit a wide range of climatic and environmental conditions. Genetic improvement programs should consider the specific needs and challenges of different geographical regions within the tropics. Developing locally adapted poultry strains can help optimize performance and productivity under varying environmental conditions. Finally, ensuring genetic diversity is crucial for the long-term sustainability and adaptability of tropical poultry populations. Genetic improvement programs must carefully manage and maintain diverse genetic resources to prevent inbreeding depression and preserve the resilience of bird populations. Addressing these challenges requires a comprehensive approach that combines traditional breeding techniques, molecular genetics, and genomic selection methods, and we have compared the differences in using each method in Table 5 for readers to consider and use appropriately. In the end, collaboration between poultry breeders, geneticists, and researchers is essential to overcome these obstacles and achieve significant genetic improvements in tropical poultry.

7. Conclusions

The effects of climate change on poultry production are significant, particularly in terms of heat stress in birds. Although genetic improvement may not be the only method to reduce heat stress in poultry, it is unquestionably one that will produce long-term results and provide animals with the ability to improve their genetics in order to adapt to more severe weather in the future. The fact that each generation inherits the DNA of the previous generation is a crucial reason why thermophilic breeding is essential for the advancement of the global poultry production system. To address the challenge of sustaining a growing global population in a sustainable manner, particularly in regions with limited resources, it is essential to combine this strategy with practical, immediate measures. A holistic approach that incorporates multiple strategies will be the most effective way to ensure food security in the face of climate change and intensifying heat stress.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J., V.C. and W.B.; methodology, J.J., V.C. and W.B.; writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, J.J., V.C. and W.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Research Program of Khon Kaen University, Thailand, grant number RP66-3-001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon reasonable request from the Network Center for Animal Breeding and Omics Research, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Names of Genes and Their Full Names Given in Manuscript

GenesFull names of the genes
HSPA2Heat shock 70 kDa protein 2
HSPH1Heat shock 105 kDa/110 kDa protein 1,
HSP25Heat shock protein 25
RB1CC1RB1-inducible coiled-coil 1
BAG3BCL2-associated athanogene 3
CITED2Cbp/p300-interacting transactivator, with Glu/Asp-rich carboxy-terminal domain, 2
CTSECathepsin E
HSPD1Heat shock 60 kDa protein 1
ID1Inhibitor Of DNA binding 1
HSP90B1Heat shock protein 90 kDa beta member 1
HSP60Heat shock protein 60
PDIA2Protein disulfide isomerase family A member 2
HSPA5Heat Shock Protein Family A (Hsp70) Member 5
HSF1Heat shock factor protein 1
HSF3Heat shock factor protein 3
HSP70Heat shock protein 70 kDa
HSP90Heat shock protein 90 kDa
HSP40Heat shock protein 40 kDa
SERPINH1Serpin family H member 1
HSP47Heat shock protein 47
FABP2Fatty acid binding protein 2 [(human)]
RAMP3Receptor activity-modifying protein 3
SUGCTSuccinyl-CoA:Glutarate-CoA Transferase
TSHRthyroid stimulating hormone receptor
GLUT-2Glucose transporter 2
FABP1Fatty acid binding protein 1
CD36Cluster of differentiation 36
TRMT1LtRNA methyltransferase 1
HS3ST5Heparan sulfate-glucosamine 3-sulfotransferase 5
EOMESEomesodermin
NFAT5Nuclear factor of activated t-cells 5
NF-κBNuclear factor kappa b
MRPL42Mitochondrial ribosomal protein L42
EDN1Endothelin 1
ACSF3Acyl-coA synthetase family member 3
CYP4V2Cytochrome P450 4V2
PLCB4Phospholipase C beta 4
H1F0H1 histone family, member 0
ACYP1Acylphosphatase 1
JAK1Janus kinase 1
JAK2Janus kinase 2
TYK2Tyrosine kinase 2
FGAFibrinogen alpha chain
LOXL2Lysyl oxidase like 2
GINS1GINS Complex Subunit 1
RRM2Ribonucleotide reductase regulatory subunit M2
PDKPyruvate dehydrogenase kinase
PDKPyruvate dehydrogenase kinase
BVESBlood Vessel Epicardial Substance
SMYD1SET And MYND Domain Containing 1
IL18Interleukin 18
PDGFRAPlatelet Derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha
CORINCorin, Serine Peptidase
NRP1Neuropilin 1
SIM2SIM BHLH Transcription Factor 2
NALCNSodium Leak Channel, Non-Selective
CLPTM1LCLPTM1 Like
APPAmyloid Beta Precursor Protein
CRADDCASP2 And RIPK1 Domain Containing Adaptor With Death Domain
PARK2Parkin RBR E3 Ubiquitin Protein Ligase 2
AHRAryl Hydrocarbon Receptor
ESRRGEstrogen Related Receptor Gamma
FASFas Cell Surface Death Receptor
UBE4BUbiquitination Factor E4B
FABP1Fatty Acid Binding Protein 1
MAP3K3Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase Kinase 3
SOCS2Suppressor Of Cytokine Signaling 2
MAPKBP1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Binding Protein 1
SPON1Spondin 1
HSP25Heat Shock Protein 25
HSD17B1Hydroxysteroid 17-Beta Dehydrogenase 1
APOBApolipoprotein B
PRDX4Peroxiredoxin 4
SERPINH1Serpin Family H Member 1
CIRBPCold Inducible RNA Binding Protein
CYP19A1Cytochrome P450 Family 19 Subfamily A Member 1
SLC33A1Solute Carrier Family 33 Member 1
TSHRThyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor
NDUFS4NADH:Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase Subunit S4
CAMK1dCalcium/Calmodulin Dependent Protein Kinase ID
CCDC3Coiled-Coil Domain Containing 3
TIRAPTIR Domain Containing Adaptor Protein
ETS1ETS Proto-Oncogene 1, Transcription Factor
KIRREL3Kirre Like Nephrin Family Adhesion Molecule 3
JAK1Janus Kinase 1
JAK2Janus Kinase 2
TYK2Tyrosine Kinase 2
HSD17B7Hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 7
STARD4StAR-related lipid transfer domain containing 4
ACSBG2Acyl-CoA Synthetase Bubblegum Family Member 2
SCDStearoyl-CoA Desaturase
INSIG1Insulin Induced Gene 1
ATOX1Antioxidant 1 Copper Chaperone
SFTPA1Surfactant Protein A1
ELK1ETS-like 1
YY1Yin Yang 1
ZFXZinc finger X-chromosomal protein
IRF3interferon regulatory factor 3
MYLK2Myosin Light Chain Kinase 2
BDKRB1Bradykinin Receptor B1
FGGFibrinogen Gamma Chain
IL1R2Interleukin 1 Receptor Type 2
IL13RA2Interleukin 13 Receptor Subunit Alpha 2
BMP10Bone Morphogenetic Protein 10
MYH7Myosin Heavy Chain 7
PLK1Polo Like Kinase 1
GADD45BGrowth Arrest And DNA Damage Inducible Beta
S100A8S100 Calcium Binding Protein A8
FOSFos Proto-Oncogene, AP-1 Transcription Factor Subunit
CEBPDCCAAT Enhancer Binding Protein Delta
CBFBCore-Binding Factor Subunit Beta
SAT1Spermidine/Spermine N1-Acetyltransferase 1
MPP1MAGUK P55 Scaffold Protein 1
F8Coagulation Factor VIII
NMIN-Myc And STAT Interactor
USP18Ubiquitin Specific Peptidase 18
CMPK2Cytidine/Uridine Monophosphate Kinase 2
IFI27L2Interferon Alpha Inducible Protein 27 Like 2
DHX58DExH-Box Helicase 58
IL-1βInterleukin 1 Beta
IL-6Interleukin 6
TNF-αTumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha
IFN-αInterferon Alpha 1
CTSDCathepsin D
CHMP1BCharged Multivesicular Body Protein 1B
TNFAIP3TNF Alpha Induced Protein 3
PARP3Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Family Member 3
LUMLumican
PRKAA1Protein Kinase AMP-Activated Catalytic Subunit Alpha 1
LYNLYN Proto-Oncogene, Src Family Tyrosine Kinase
ABCA1ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily A Member 1
CAT1Catalase 1
DLDDihydrolipoamide Dehydrogenase
LDHBLactate Dehydrogenase B
ME1Malic Enzyme 1
PCK1Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase 1
PDHA1Pyruvate Dehydrogenase E1 Subunit Alpha 1
COX5ACytochrome C Oxidase Subunit 5A
COX6CCytochrome C Oxidase Subunit 6C
NDUFS3NADH:Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase Core Subunit S3
UQCRC1Ubiquinol-Cytochrome C Reductase Core Protein 1
ACO2Aconitase 2
ACAT1Acetyl-CoA Acetyltransferase 1
CHGAChromogranin A
CHGBChromogranin B
HSPA5Heat shock 70 kDa protein 5
HSPA8Heat shock 70 kDa protein 8
HSP90AA1Heat shock protein 90 kDa alpha, class A member 1
HSPA2Heat shock 70 kDa protein 2
FKBP4FK506 binding protein 4
HSP90αHeat shock protein 90 kDa alpha
HSP70Heat shock 70 kDa
FABP7Fatty Acid Binding Protein 7
FTH1Ferritin Heavy Chain 1
GSTA1Glutathione S-Transferase Alpha 1
ENO1Enolase 1
TUBBTubulin Beta Class I

References

  1. Attwood, S.; Hajat, C. How will the COVID-19 pandemic shape the future of meat consumption? Public Health Nutr. 2020, 23, 3116–3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Giller, K.E.; Hijbeek, R.; Andersson, J.A.; Sumberg, J. Regenerative agriculture: An agronomic perspective. Outlook Agric. 2021, 50, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fróna, D.; Szenderák, J.; Harangi-Rákos, M. Economic effects of climate change on global agricultural production. Nat. Conserv. 2021, 44, 117–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. FAO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2022. Repurposing Food and Agricultural Policies to Make Healthy Diets More Affordable; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Global Hunger Index Scores by 2021 GHI Rank. 2021. Available online: https://www.globalhungerindex.org/ranking.html (accessed on 4 July 2022).
  6. World Population Data Sheet. World Population Data Sheet Released. PRB. 2021. Available online: https://www.prb.org/news/2021-world-population-data-sheet-released (accessed on 4 July 2022).
  7. Whitton, C.; Bogueva, D.; Marinova, D.; Phillips, C.J.C. Are we approaching peak meat consumption? Analysis of meat consumption from 2000 to 2019 in 35 countries and its relationship to gross domestic product. Animals 2021, 11, 3466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. OECD-FAO. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2020–2029. 2021. Available online: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/29248f46-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/29248f46-en (accessed on 10 June 2022).
  9. Copernicus. Copernicus: Globally, the Seven Hottest Years on Record Were the Last Seven; Carbon Dioxide and Methane Concentrations Continue to Rise. 2022. Available online: https://climate.copernicus.eu/copernicus-globally-seven-hottest-years-record-were-last-seven (accessed on 25 March 2023).
  10. Kpomasse, C.C.; Oke, O.E.; Houndonougbo, F.M.; Tona, K. Broiler production challenges in the tropics: A review. Vet. Med. Sci. 2021, 7, 831–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. St-Pierre, N.R.; Cobanov, B.; Schnitkey, G. Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, E52–E77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pawar, S.S.; Basavaraj, S.; Dhansing, L.V.; Pandurang, K.N.; Sahebrao, K.A.; Vitthal, N.A.; Pandit, B.M.; Kumar, B.S. Assessing and mitigating the impact of heat stress in poultry. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2016, 4, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Scanes, C.G.; Dridi, S. Sturkie’s Avian Physiology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  14. Vandana, G.D.; Sejian, V.; Lees, A.M.; Pragna, P.; Silpa, M.V.; Maloney, S.K. Heat stress and poultry production: Impact and amelioration. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2021, 65, 163–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Syafwan, S.; Kwakkel, R.P.; Verstegen, M.W.A. Heat stress and feeding strategies in meat-type chickens. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2011, 67, 653–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Farghly, M.F.A.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Alagawany, M.; Saadeldin, I.M.; Swelum, A.A. Wet feed and cold water as heat stress modulators in growing Muscovy ducklings. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 1588–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Al-Sultan, S.I.; Abdel-Raheem, S.M.; Abd-Allah, S.M.S.; Edris, A.M. Alleviation of chronic heat stress in broilers by dietary supplementation of novel feed additive combinations. Slov. Vet. Res. 2019, 56, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gouda, A.; Amer, S.A.; Gabr, S.; Tolba, S.A. Effect of dietary supplemental ascorbic acid and folic acid on the growth performance, redox status, and immune status of broiler chickens under heat stress. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2020, 52, 2987–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lochi, G.M.; Shah, M.G.; Gandahi, J.A.; Gadahi, J.A.; Hadi, S.A.; Farooq, T.; Vistro, W.A.; Rahmani, M.M. Effect of selenium nanoparticles and chitosan on production performance and antioxidant integrity of heat-stressed broiler. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 1977–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ogbuagu, N.E.; Ayo, J.O. Effects of l-serine administration on meat quality, characteristics and mineral content of tibia bone in heat-stressed broiler. Vet. Integr. Sci. 2023, 21, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Du, M.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhao, H.; Wen, C.; Zhou, Y. Dietary supplementation with synbiotics improves growth performance, antioxidant status, immune function, and intestinal barrier function in broilers subjected to cyclic heat stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 18026–18038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Abbass, G.; Abid, A.R. Effect of peppermint, fenugreek and their mixture on production traits of heat stressed broiler chickens. J. Surv. Fish. Sci. 2023, 10, 2704–2716. [Google Scholar]
  23. Laganá, C.; Ribeiro, A.M.L.; Kessler, A.M.; Kratz, L.R.; Pinheiro, C.C. Effect of the supplementation of vitamins and organic minerals on the performance of broilers under heat stress. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2007, 9, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ghazi Harsini, S.; Habibiyan, M.; Moeini, M.M.; Abdolmohammadi, A.R. Effects of dietary selenium, vitamin E, and their combination on growth, serum metabolites, and antioxidant defense system in skeletal muscle of broilers under heat stress. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2012, 148, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Alagawany, M.; Noreldin, A.E. Managerial and nutritional trends to mitigate heat stress risks in poultry farms. In Sustainability of Agricultural Environment in Egypt: Part II. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; Volume 77, pp. 325–338. [Google Scholar]
  26. Calik, A.; Emami, N.K.; White, M.B.; Walsh, M.C.; Romero, L.F.; Dalloul, R.A. Influence of dietary vitamin E and selenium supplementation on broilers subjected to heat stress, Part I: Growth performance, body composition and intestinal nutrient transporters. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 101857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Awojobi, H.A.; Oluwole, B.O.; Adekunmisi, A.A.; Buraimo, R.A. Performance of finisher broilers fed wet mash with or without drinking water during wet season in the tropics. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2009, 8, 592–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saeed, M.; Abbas, G.; Alagawany, M.; Kamboh, A.A.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Khafaga, A.F.; Chao, S. Heat stress management in poultry farms: A comprehensive overview. J. Therm. Biol. 2019, 84, 414–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Polsky, L.; von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. Invited review: Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 8645–8657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. El-Kholy, M.S.; El-Hindawy, M.M.; Alagawany, M.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; El-Sayed, S.A.A. Use of acetylsalicylic acid as an allostatic modulator in the diets of growing Japanese quails exposed to heat stress. J. Therm. Biol. 2018, 74, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Farag, M.R.; Alagawany, M. Physiological alterations of poultry to the high environmental temperature. J. Therm. Biol. 2018, 76, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gonzalez-Rivas, P.A.; Chauhan, S.S.; Ha, M.; Fegan, N.; Dunshea, F.R.; Warner, R.D. Effects of heat stress on animal physiology, metabolism, and meat quality: A review. Meat Sci. 2020, 162, 108025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tokutake, Y.; Takanashi, R.; Kikusato, M.; Toyomizu, M.; Sato, K. Effect of dietary 4-phenylbuthyric acid supplementation on acute heat-stress-induced hyperthermia in broiler chickens. Animals 2022, 12, 2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zaboli, G.-R.; Rahimi, S.; Shariatmadari, F.; Torshizi, M.A.K.; Baghbanzadeh, A.; Mehri, M. Thermal manipulation during pre and post-hatch on thermotolerance of male broiler chickens exposed to chronic heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2017, 96, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lu, Z.; He, X.; Ma, B.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Jiang, Y.; Zhou, G.; Gao, F. Chronic heat stress impairs the quality of breast-muscle meat in broilers by affecting redox status and energy-substance metabolism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 11251–11258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Meltzer, A.; Goodman, G.; Fistool, J. Thermoneutral zone and resting metabolic rate of growing White Leghorn-type chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 1982, 23, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pace, N.; Rahlmann, D. Thermoneutral zone and scaling of metabolic rate on body mass in small mammals. Physiol. Suppl. 1983, 26, 19840041554. [Google Scholar]
  38. Silva, G.L.L.P.; Punyawardena, B.V.R.; Hettiarachchi, A.K.; Hulugalla, W.M.M.P.; Lokuge, G.M.S. Assessing thermal neutral zones in Sri Lanka for ten different dairy cattle breeds and crosses: An approach using temperature humidity index (THI). Int. J. Livest. Prod. 2021, 12, 112–121. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hadfield, J.; Hadfield, J.; Dallin, J.; Millward, L. Maintaining Pig Temperatures in the Summer and Winter Seasons; Utah State University Extension: Logan, UT, USA, 2023; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yan, L.; Hu, M.; Gu, L.; Lei, M.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, H.; Chen, R. Effect of heat stress on egg production, steroid hormone synthesis, and related gene expression in chicken preovulatory follicular granulosa cells. Animals 2022, 12, 1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Charles, D.R.; Walker, A.W. Poultry Environment Problems: A Guide to Solutions; University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus: Loughborough, UK, 2002; p. 88. [Google Scholar]
  42. Durmuş, İ.; Kamanli, S. Effects of cold and heat stress on egg quality traits of a newly developed native hybrid layer. Turk. J. Agric. Food. Sci. Technol. 2015, 3, 444–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Qaid, M.M.; Al-Garadi, M.A. Protein and amino acid metabolism in poultry during and after heat stress: A review. Animals 2021, 11, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cândido, M.G.L.; Tinôco, I.F.F.; Herker, L.P.; Ireno, T.F.P.; Andrade, R.R.; Gates, R.S. Evaluation of a low cost thermographic camera for poultry temperature. In Proceedings of the 10th International Livestock Environment Symposium (ILES X), Omaha, NE, USA, 25–27 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
  45. Shakeri, M.; Oskoueian, E.; Le, H.H.; Shakeri, M. Strategies to combat heat stress in broiler chickens: Unveiling the roles of selenium, vitamin E and vitamin C. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Welay, K.; Amaha, N.; Demeke, S.; Debusho, L.K.; Girma, M. Growth performance and carcass characteristics of Koekoek chickens exposed to temperature variation with supplementary coriander seed powder. J. Therm. Biol. 2023, 116, 103674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sohail, M.U.; Hume, M.E.; Byrd, J.A.; Nisbet, D.J.; Ijaz, A.; Sohail, A.; Shabbir, M.Z.; Rehman, H. Effect of supplementation of prebiotic mannanoligosaccharides and probiotic mixture on growth performance of broilers subjected to chronic heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 2235–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhao, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhao, F.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, X.; Geng, Z.; Zhang, C. Resveratrol attenuates heat stress-induced impairment of meat quality in broilers by regulating the Nrf2 signaling pathway. Animals 2022, 12, 1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Attia, Y.A.; Abd El-Hamid, A.E.-H.E.; Abedalla, A.A.; Berika, M.A.; Al-Harthi, M.A.; Kucuk, O.; Sahin, K.; Abou-Shehema, B.M. Laying performance, digestibility and plasma hormones in laying hens exposed to chronic heat stress as affected by betaine, vitamin C, and/or vitamin E supplementation. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Boonkum, W.; Duangjinda, M.; Kananit, S.; Chankitisakul, V.; Kenchaiwong, W. Genetic effect and growth curve parameter estimation under heat stress in slow-growing Thai native chickens. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Loengbudnark, W.; Chankitisakul, V.; Boonkum, W. The genetic impact of heat stress on the egg production of Thai native chickens (Pradu Hang dum). PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0281328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ribeiro, C.; Hennen-Bierwagen, T.A.; Myers, A.M.; Cline, K.; Settles, A.M. Engineering 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase improves grain yield in heat-stressed maize. Agric. Sci. 2020, 117, 33177–33185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Strong, R.A.; Hester, P.Y.; Eicher, S.D.; Hu, J.; Cheng, H.-W. The effect of cooled perches on immunological parameters of caged White Leghorn hens during the hot summer months. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hu, J.Y.; Hester, P.Y.; Xiong, Y.; Gates, R.S.; Makagon, M.M.; Cheng, H.W. Effect of cooled perches on the efficacy of an induced molt in White Leghorn laying hens previously exposed to heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 4290–4300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Raza, H.M.U.; Ashraf, H.; Shahzad, K.; Sultan, M.; Miyazaki, T.; Usman, M.; Shamshiri, R.R.; Zhou, Y.; Ahmad, R. Investigating applicability of evaporative cooling systems for thermal comfort of poultry birds in Pakistan. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Smit, B.; Zietsman, G.; Martin, R.O.; Cunningham, S.J.; McKechnie, A.E.; Hockey, P.A.R. Behavioural responses to heat in desert birds: Implications for predicting vulnerability to climate warming. Clim. Chang. Response 2016, 3, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ratnakaran, A.P.; Sejian, V.; Jose, V.S.; Vaswani, S.; Bagath, M.; Krishnan, G.; Beena, V.; Devi, P.I.; Varma, G.; Bhatta, R. Behavioral responses to livestock adaptation to heat stress challenges. Asian J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yang, L.; Tan, G.-Y.; Fu, Y.-Q.; Feng, J.-H.; Zhang, M.-H. Effects of acute heat stress and subsequent stress removal on function of hepatic mitochondrial respiration, ROS production and lipid peroxidation in broiler chickens. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010, 151, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shahzad, K.; Sultan, M.; Bilal, M.; Ashraf, H.; Farooq, M.; Miyazaki, T.; Sajjad, U.; Ali, I.; Hussain, M.I. Experiments on energy-efficient evaporative cooling systems for poultry farm application in Multan (Pakistan). Sustainability 2021, 13, 2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Iyasere, O.S.; Edwards, S.A.; Bateson, M.; Mitchell, M.; Guy, J.H. Validation of an intramuscularly-implanted microchip and a surface infrared thermometer to estimate core body temperature in broiler chickens exposed to heat stress. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 133, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wolf, B.O.; Walsberg, G.E. The role of the plumage in heat transfer processes of birds. Am. Zool. 2000, 40, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chaiyabutr, N. Physiological reactions of poultry to heat stress and methods to reduce its effects on poultry production. Thai J. Vet. Med. 2004, 34, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, S.; Yong, Y.; Ju, X. Effect of heat stress on growth and production performance of livestock and poultry: Mechanism to prevention. J. Therm. Biol. 2021, 99, 103019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nawaz, A.H.; Amoah, K.; Leng, Q.Y.; Zheng, J.H.; Zhang, W.L.; Zhang, L. Poultry response to heat stress: Its physiological, metabolic, and genetic implications on meat production and quality including strategies to improve broiler production in a warming world. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 699081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cockrem, J.F. Stress, corticosterone responses and avian personalities. J. Ornithol. 2007, 148, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kuo, T.; McQueen, A.; Chen, T.C.; Wang, J.C. Regulation of glucose homeostasis by glucocorticoids. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2015, 872, 99–126. [Google Scholar]
  67. Akalestou, E.; Genser, L.; Rutter, G.A. Glucocorticoid metabolism in obesity and following weight loss. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Magomedova, L.; Cummins, C.L. Glucocorticoids and metabolic control. Metabolic Control. In Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 73–93. [Google Scholar]
  69. Riezman, H. Why do cells require heat shock proteins to survive heat stress? Cell Cycle 2004, 3, 60–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ray, S.; Sharma, S.; Maheshwari, A.; Aneja, S.; Kumar, A. Heat stroke in an infant with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia: Brain magnetic resonance imaging findings. J. Child Neurol. 2013, 28, 538–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Popoola, I.O.; Popoola, O.R.; Ojeniyi, M.O.; Olajide, O.O.; Iyayi, E.A. The roles of key electrolytes in balancing blood acid-base and nutrient in broiler chickens reared under tropical conditions. Nat. Sci. 2020, 12, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Teeter, R.; Smith, M.; Owens, F.; Arp, S.; Sangiah, S.; Breazile, J. Chronic heat stress and respiratory alkalosis: Occurrence and treatment in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 1985, 64, 1060–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Mashaly, M.M.; Hendricks, G.L.; Kalama, M.A.; Gehad, A.E.; Abbas, A.O.; Patterson, P.H. Effect of heat stress on production parameters and immune responses of commercial laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 889–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Mota-Rojas, D.; Titto, C.G.; de Mira Geraldo, A.; Martínez-Burnes, J.; Gómez, J.; Hernández-Ávalos, I.; Casas, A.; Domínguez, A.; José, N.; Bertoni, A.; et al. Efficacy and function of feathers, hair, and glabrous skin in the thermoregulation strategies of domestic animals. Animals 2021, 11, 3472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hall, D.M.; Buettner, G.R.; Oberley, L.W.; Xu, L.; Matthes, R.D.; Gisolfi, C.V. Mechanisms of circulatory and intestinal barrier dysfunction during whole body hyperthermia. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2001, 280, H509–H521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nawab, A.; Ibtisham, F.; Li, G.; Kieser, B.; Wu, J.; Liu, W.; Zhao, Y.; Nawab, Y.; Li, K.; Xiao, M.; et al. Heat stress in poultry production: Mitigation strategies to overcome the future challenges facing the global poultry industry. J. Therm. Biol. 2018, 78, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wasti, S.; Sah, N.; Mishra, B. Impact of heat stress on poultry health and performances, and potential mitigation strategies. Animals 2020, 10, 1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Khan, R.U.; Naz, S.; Ullah, H.; Ullah, Q.; Laudadio, V.; Qudratullah; Bozzo, G.; Tufarelli, V. Physiological dynamics in broiler chickens under heat stress and possible mitigation strategies. Anim. Biotechnol. 2021, 34, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shakeri, M.; Le, H.H. Deleterious effects of heat stress on poultry production: Unveiling the benefits of betaine and polyphenols. Poultry 2022, 1, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Del Vesco, A.; Gasparino, E.; Zancanela, V.; Grieser, D.; Stanquevis, C.; Pozza, P.; Oliveira Neto, A. Effects of selenium supplementation on the oxidative state of acute heat stress-exposed quails. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 101, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kikusato, M.; Toyomizu, M. Mechanisms underlying the effects of heat stress on intestinal integrity, inflammation, and microbiota in chickens. Poult. Sci. J. 2023, 60, 2023021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zaboli, G.; Huang, X.; Feng, X.; Ahn, D.U. How can heat stress affect chicken meat quality?—A review. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 1551–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lin, H.; Decuypere, E.; Buyse, J. Acute heat stress induces oxidative stress in broiler chickens. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2006, 144, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Song, Z.H.; Cheng, K.; Zheng, X.C.; Ahmad, H.; Zhang, L.L.; Wang, T. Effects of dietary supplementation with enzymatically treated artemisia annua on growth performance, intestinal morphology, digestive enzyme activities, immunity, and antioxidant capacity of heat-stressed broilers. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 430–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Nanto-Hara, F.; Ohtsu, H.; Yamazaki, M.; Hirakawa, T.; Sato, K.; Murakami, H. Effects of dietary brown rice on the growth performance, systemic oxidative status, and splenic inflammatory responses of broiler chickens under chronic heat stress. J. Poult. Sci. 2021, 58, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Gil, M.G.; Gomez-Raya, L.; Torres, O.; Cigarroa-Vazquez, F.A.; Davila, S.G.; Rauw, W.M. Heterophil/Lymphocyte response of local spanish breeds of laying hens to cold stress, heat stress, and water restriction. J. Therm. Biol. 2023, 113, 103542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Videla, E.A.; Giayetto, O.; Fernández, M.E.; Chacana, P.A.; Marín, R.H.; Nazar, F.N. Immediate and transgenerational effects of thymol supplementation, inactivated salmonella and chronic heat stress on representative immune variables of Japanese quail. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Soleimani, A.F.; Zulkifli, I.; Omar, A.R.; Raha, A.R. Physiological responses of 3 chicken breeds to acute heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 1435–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Al-Murrani, W.; Kassab, A.; Al-Sam, H.; Al-Athari, A. Heterophil/Lymphocyte ratio as a selection criterion for heat resistance in domestic fowls. Br. Poult. Sci. 1997, 38, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hirakawa, R.; Nurjanah, S.; Furukawa, K.; Murai, A.; Kikusato, M.; Nochi, T.; Toyomizu, M. Heat stress causes immune abnormalities via massive damage to effect proliferation and differentiation of lymphocytes in broiler chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kammon, A.; Alzentani, S.; Tarhuni, O.; Asheg, A. Effect of some organic acids on body weight, immunity and cecal bacterial count of chicken during heat stress. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2019, 18, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Honda, B.T.B.; Calefi, A.S.; Costola-de-Souza, C.; Quinteiro-Filho, W.M.; da Silva Fonseca, J.G.; de Paula, V.F.; Palermo-Neto, J. Effects of Heat stress on peripheral T and B Lymphocyte profiles and IgG and IgM serum levels in broiler chickens vaccinated for Newcastle disease virus. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 2375–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Alhenaky, A.; Abdelqader, A.; Abuajamieh, M.; Al-Fataftah, A.-R. The effect of heat stress on intestinal integrity and salmonella invasion in broiler birds. J. Therm. Biol. 2017, 70, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Quinteiro-Filho, W.M.; Gomes, A.; Pinheiro, M.L.; Ribeiro, A.; Ferraz-de-Paula, V.; Astolfi-Ferreira, C.S.; Ferreira, A.J.P.; Palermo-Neto, J. Heat stress impairs performance and induces intestinal inflammation in broiler chickens infected with salmonella enteritidis. Avian Pathol. 2012, 41, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ahmad, R.; Yu, Y.-H.; Hsiao, F.S.-H.; Su, C.-H.; Liu, H.-C.; Tobin, I.; Zhang, G.; Cheng, Y.-H. Influence of heat stress on poultry growth performance, intestinal inflammation, and immune function and potential mitigation by probiotics. Animals 2022, 12, 2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ghulam Mohyuddin, S.; Khan, I.; Zada, A.; Qamar, A.; Arbab, A.A.I.; Ma, X.; Yu, Z.; Liu, X.-X.; Yong, Y.-H.; Ju, X.H.; et al. Influence of Heat Stress on Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Function, Tight Junction Protein, and Immune and Reproductive Physiology. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022, 2022, e8547379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Calefi, A.S.; QUINTEIRO-FILHO, W.M.; Ferreira, A.J.P.; Palermo-Neto, J. Neuroimmunomodulation and heat stress in poultry. Worlds. Poult. Sci. J. 2017, 73, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rowland, K.; Ashwell, C.M.; Persia, M.E.; Rothschild, M.F.; Schmidt, C.; Lamont, S.J. Genetic Analysis of production, physiological, and egg quality traits in heat-challenged commercial white egg-laying hens using 600k snp array data. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2019, 51, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mazzoni, M.; Zampiga, M.; Clavenzani, P.; Lattanzio, G.; Tagliavia, C.; Sirri, F. Effect of chronic heat stress on gastrointestinal histology and expression of feed intake-regulatory hormones in broiler chickens. Animals 2022, 16, 100600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Awad, W.A.; Ruhnau, D.; Hess, C.; Doupovec, B.; Schatzmayr, D.; Hess, M. Feeding of deoxynivalenol increases the intestinal paracellular permeability of broiler chickens. Arch. Toxicol. 2019, 93, 2057–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Khan, R.U.; Naz, S.; Nikousefat, Z.; Tufarelli, V.; Javdani, M.; Rana, N.; Laudadio, V. Effect of vitamin E in heat-stressed poultry. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2011, 67, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sohail, M.U.; Ijaz, A.; Yousaf, M.S.; Ashraf, K.; Zaneb, H.; Aleem, M.; Rehman, H. Alleviation of cyclic heat stress in broilers by dietary supplementation of mannan-oligosaccharide and lactobacillus-based probiotic: Dynamics of cortisol, thyroid hormones, cholesterol, c-reactive protein, and humoral immunity. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 1934–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Nanto-Hara, F.; Kikusato, M.; Ohwada, S.; Toyomizu, M. Heat stress directly affects intestinal integrity in broiler chickens. Jpn. Poult. Sci. 2020, 57, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tabler, T.W.; Greene, E.S.; Orlowski, S.K.; Hiltz, J.Z.; Anthony, N.B.; Dridi, S. Intestinal barrier integrity in heat-stressed modern broilers and their ancestor wild jungle fowl. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Donoghue, D.J.; Krueger, B.F.; Hargis, B.M.; Miller, A.M.; el Halawani, M. Thermal stress reduces serum luteinizing hormone and bioassayable hypothalamic content of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in hens. Biol. Reprod. 1989, 41, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Olusegun, O.; Alabi, O. Influence of high environmental temperature on egg production and shell quality: A review. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2010, 66, 739–749. [Google Scholar]
  107. McDaniel, C.D.; Bramwell, R.K.; Wilson, J.L.; Howarth, J.B. Fertility of male and female broiler breeders following exposure to an elevated environmental temperature. Poult. Sci. 1995, 74, 1029–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kamel, N.N.; Ahmed, A.M.H.; Mehaisen, G.M.K.; Mashaly, M.M.; Abass, A.O. Depression of leukocyte protein synthesis, immune function and growth performance induced by high environmental temperature in broiler chickens. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2017, 61, 1637–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Aguanta, B.N.; Fuller, A.L.; Milfort, M.C.; Williams, S.M.; Rekaya, R.; Aggrey, S.E. Histologic effects of concurrent heat stress and coccidial infection on the lymphoid tissues of broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 2018, 62, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chomchuen, K.; Tuntiyasawasdikul, V.; Chankitisakul, V.; Boonkum, W. Comparative study of phenotypes and genetics related to the growth performance of crossbred Thai indigenous (KKU1 vs. KKU2) chickens under hot and humid conditions. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Chomchuen, K.; Tuntiyasawasdikul, V.; Chankitisakul, V.; Boonkum, W. Genetic evaluation of body weights and egg production traits using a multi-trait animal model and selection index in Thai native synthetic chickens (Kaimook e-san2). Animals 2022, 12, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Rong, Y.; Zeng, M.; Guan, X.; Qu, K.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Chen, H.; Huang, B.; Lei, C. Association of HSF1 genetic variation with heat tolerance in Chinese cattle. Animals 2019, 9, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Sigdel, A.; Abdollahi-Arpanahi, R.; Aguilar, I.; Peñagaricano, F. Whole genome mapping reveals novel genes and pathways involved in milk production under heat stress in US Holstein cows. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Carabaño, M.J.; Logar, B.; Bormann, J.; Minet, J.; Vanrobays, M.L.; Díaz, C.; Tychon, B.; Gengler, N.; Hammami, H. Modeling heat stress under different environmental conditions. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 3798–3814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Pryce, J.E.; Nguyen, T.T.T.; Cheruiyot, E.K.; Marett, L.; Garner, J.B.; Haile-Mariam, M. Impact of hot weather on animal performance and genetic strategies to minimise the effect. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2022, 62, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wang, S.-H.; Cheng, C.-Y.; Tang, P.-C.; Chen, C.-F.; Chen, H.-H.; Lee, Y.-P.; Huang, S.-Y. Acute heat stress induces differential gene expressions in the testes of a broiler-type strain of Taiwan country chickens. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Van Goor, A.; Bolek, K.J.; Ashwell, C.M.; Persia, M.E.; Rothschild, M.F.; Schmidt, C.J.; Lamont, S.J. Identification of quantitative trait loci for body temperature, body weight, breast yield, and digestibility in an advanced intercross line of chickens under heat stress. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2015, 47, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Asadollahpour Nanaei, H.; Kharrati-Koopaee, H.; Esmailizadeh, A. Genetic diversity and signatures of selection for heat tolerance and immune response in Iranian native chickens. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Dekkers, J.; Hospital, F. The use of molecular genetics in the improvement of agricultural populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Cedraz, H.; Gromboni, J.G.G.; Junior, A.A.P.G.; Filho, R.V.F.; Souza, T.M.; de Oliveira, E.R.; de Oliveira, E.B.; do Nascimento, C.S.; Meneghetti, C.; Wenceslau, A.A. Heat stress induces expression of HSP genes in genetically divergent chickens. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Shehata, A.M.; Saadeldin, I.M.; Tukur, H.A.; Habashy, W.S. Modulation of heat-shock proteins mediates chicken cell survival against thermal stress. Animals 2020, 10, 2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Duangjinda, M.; Tunim, S.; Duangdaen, C.; Boonkum, W. Hsp70 genotypes and heat tolerance of commercial and native chickens reared in hot and humid conditions. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2017, 19, 07–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Luo, Q.B.; Song, X.Y.; Ji, C.L.; Zhang, X.Q.; Zhang, D.X. Exploring the molecular mechanism of acute heat stress exposure in broiler chickens using gene expression profiling. Gene 2014, 546, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Sun, X.; Zhang, H.; Sheikhahmadi, A.; Wang, Y.; Jiao, H.; Lin, H.; Song, Z. Effects of heat stress on the gene expression of nutrient transporters in the jejunum of broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Int. J. Biometeorol. 2015, 59, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, Z.; Shi, H.; Kang, Y.; Wang, J.; Huang, J.; Jiang, L. Effects of heat stress on respiratory burst, oxidative damage and SERPINH1 (HSP47) mRNA expression in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 42, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Tellechea, M.; Buxadé, M.; Tejedor, S.; Aramburu, J.; López-Rodríguez, C. NFAT5-regulated macrophage polarization supports the proinflammatory function of macrophages and T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 2018, 200, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Srikanth, K.; Kumar, H.; Park, W.; Byun, M.; Lim, D.; Kemp, S.; Te Pas, M.F.W.; Kim, J.M.; Park, J.E. Cardiac and skeletal muscle transcriptome response to heat stress in Kenyan chicken ecotypes adapted to low and high altitudes reveal differences in thermal tolerance and stress response. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Kumar, M.; Ratwan, P.; Dahiya, S.P.; Nehra, A.K. Climate change and heat stress: Impact on production, reproduction and growth performance of poultry and its mitigation using genetic strategies. J. Therm. Biol. 2021, 97, 102867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Asadollahi, H.; Torshizi, R.V.; Ehsani, A.; Masoudi, A.A. An association of CEP78, MEF2C, VPS13A and ARRDC3 genes with survivability to heat stress in an F2 chicken population. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2022, 139, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. De Maio, A.; Vazquez, D. Extracellular heat shock proteins: A new location, a new function. Shock 2013, 40, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Dewe, J.M.; Fuller, B.L.; Lentini, J.M.; Kellner, S.M.; Fu, D. TRMT1-catalyzed tRNA modifications are required for redox homeostasis to ensure proper cellular proliferation and oxidative stress survival. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2017, 37, e00214-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Walugembe, M.; Bertolini, F.; Dematawewa, C.M.B.; Reis, M.P.; Elbeltagy, A.R.; Schmidt, C.J.; Lamont, S.J.; Rothschild, M.F. Detection of selection signatures among Brazilian, Sri Lankan, and Egyptian chicken populations under different environmental conditions. Front. Genet. 2019, 9, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Szauter, K.M.; Jansen, M.K.; Okimoto, G.; Loomis, M.; Kimura, J.H.; Heller, M.; Ku, T.; Tiirikainen, M.; Boyd, C.D.; Csiszar, K.; et al. Persistent inflammatory pathways associated with early onset myocardial infarction in a medicated multiethnic Hawaiian cohort. Biochem. Insights 2011, 4, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zhang, J.; Marotel, M.; Fauteux-Daniel, S.; Mathieu, A.L.; Viel, S.; Marçais, A.; Walzer, T. T-bet and Eomes govern differentiation and function of mouse and human NK cells and ILC1. Eur. J. Immunol. 2018, 48, 738–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Tian, W.; Zheng, H.; Yang, L.; Li, H.; Tian, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lyu, S.; Brockmann, G.A.; Kang, X.; Liu, X. Dynamic expression profile, regulatory mechanism and correlation with egg-laying performance of ACSF gene family in chicken (Gallus gallus). Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Claire D’Andre, H.; Paul, W.; Shen, X.; Jia, X.; Zhang, R.; Sun, L.; Zhang, X. Identification and characterization of genes that control fat deposition in chickens. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2013, 4, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Meuwissen, T.; Hayes, B.; Goddard, M. Genomic selection: A paradigm shift in animal breeding. Anim. Front. 2016, 6, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Wang, Y.; Mette, M.F.; Miedaner, T.; Gottwald, M.; Wilde, P.; Reif, J.C.; Zhao, Y. The accuracy of prediction of genomic selection in elite hybrid rye populations surpasses the accuracy of marker-assisted selection and is equally augmented by multiple field evaluation locations and test years. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Dekkers, J.C.M. Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2007, 124, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ceballos, H.; Kawuki, R.S.; Gracen, V.E.; Yencho, G.C.; Hershey, C.H. Conventional breeding, marker-assisted selection, genomic selection and inbreeding in clonally propagated crops: A case study for cassava. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2015, 128, 1647–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Misztal, I.; Legarra, A.; Aguilar, I. Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. J. Dairy. Sci. 2009, 92, 4648–4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Guo, Y.; Liao, J.-H.; Liang, Z.-L.; Balasubramanian, B.; Liu, W.-C. Hepatic lipid metabolomics in response to heat stress in local broiler chickens breed (Huaixiang chickens). Vet. Med. Sci. 2021, 7, 1369–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Bjorkquist, A.; Ashwell, C.; Persia, M.; Rothschild, M.F.; Schmidt, C.; Lamont, S.J. QTL for body composition traits during heat stress revealed in an advanced intercross line of chickens. In Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 17–22 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  144. Zhuang, Z.X.; Chen, S.-E.; Chen, C.-F.; Lin, E.-C.; Huang, S.-Y. Genomic regions and pathways associated with thermotolerance in layer-type strain Taiwan indigenous chickens. J. Therm. Biol. 2020, 88, 102486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Zhuang, Z.-X.; Chen, S.-E.; Chen, C.-F.; Lin, E.-C.; Huang, S.-Y. Genome-wide association study on the body temperature changes of a broiler-type strain Taiwan country chickens under acute heat stress. J. Therm. Biol. 2019, 82, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Wolc, A.; Arango, J.; Settar, P.; Fulton, J.E.; O’Sullivan, N.P.; Dekkers, J.C.M. Genome wide association study for heat stress induced mortality in a white egg layer line. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Saelao, P.; Wang, Y.; Chanthavixay, G.; Gallardo, R.A.; Wolc, A.; Dekkers, J.C.M.; Lamont, S.J.; Kelly, T.; Zhou, H. Genetics and genomic regions affecting response to Newcastle disease virus infection under heat stress in layer chickens. Genes 2019, 10, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Wells, K.L.; Hadad, Y.; Ben-Avraham, D.; Hillel, J.; Cahaner, A.; Headon, D.J. Genome-wide SNP scan of pooled DNA reveals nonsense mutation in FGF20 in the scaleless line of featherless chickens. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Thudi, M.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Rathore, A.; Gaur, P.M.; Krishnamurthy, L.; Roorkiwal, M.; Nayak, S.N.; Chaturvedi, S.K.; Basu, P.S.; Gangarao, N.V.P.R.; et al. Genetic dissection of drought and heat tolerance in chickpea through genome-wide and candidate gene-based association mapping approaches. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Lowe, E.K.; Cuomo, C.; Arnone, M.I. Omics approaches to study gene regulatory networks for development in echinoderms. Brief. Funct. Genom. 2017, 16, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. O’Connell, K.; Gannon, J.; Doran, P.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteomic profiling reveals a severely perturbed protein expression pattern in aged skeletal muscle. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2007, 20, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Gu, J.; Liang, Q.; Liu, C.; Li, S. Genomic analyses reveal adaptation to hot arid and harsh environments in native chickens of China. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 582355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Asadollahi, H.; Torshizi, R.V.; Ehsani, A.; Masoudi, A. A genome-wide association study of survival to unexpected acute heat stress in a F2 chicken population. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2021, 23, 283–292. [Google Scholar]
  154. Cheng, C.Y.; Tu, W.L.; Chen, C.J.; Chan, H.J.; Chen, C.F.; Chen, H.H.; Tang, P.C.; Lee, Y.P.; Chen, S.E.; Huang, S.Y. Functional genomics study of acute heat stress response in the small yellow follicles of layer-type chickens. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Shi, S.; Shao, D.; Yang, L.; Liang, Q.; Han, W.; Xue, Q.; Qu, L.; Leng, L.; Li, Y.; Zhao, X.; et al. Whole genome analyses reveal novel genes associated with chicken adaptation to tropical and frigid environments. J. Adv. Res. 2023, 47, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Zahoor, I.; de Koning, D.-J.; Hocking, P.M. Transcriptional profile of breast muscle in heat stressed layers is similar to that of broiler chickens at control temperature. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2017, 49, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Wang, Y.; Jia, X.; Hsieh, J.C.F.; Monson, M.S.; Zhang, J.; Shu, D.; Nie, Q.; Persia, M.E.; Rothschild, M.F.; Lamont, S.J. Transcriptome response of liver and muscle in heat-stressed laying hens. Genes 2021, 12, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Saelao, P.; Wang, Y.; Chanthavixay, G.; Yu, V.; Gallardo, R.A.; Dekkers, J.C.M.; Lamont, S.J.; Kelly, T.; Zhou, H. Integrated proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of differential expression of chicken lung tissue in response to NDV infection during heat stress. Genes 2018, 9, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Chanthavixay, G.; Kern, C.; Wang, Y.; Saelao, P.; Lamont, S.J.; Gallardo, R.A.; Rincon, G.; Zhou, H. Integrated transcriptome and histone modification analysis reveals NDV infection under heat stress affects bursa development and proliferation in susceptible chicken line. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 567812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Kim, H.; Kim, H.; Seong, P.; Arora, D.; Shin, D.; Park, W.; Park, J.-E. Transcriptomic response under heat stress in chickens revealed the regulation of genes and alteration of metabolism to maintain homeostasis. Animals 2021, 11, 2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Monson, M.S.; Van Goor, A.G.; Persia, M.E.; Rothschild, M.F.; Schmidt, C.J.; Lamont, S.J. Genetic lines respond uniquely within the chicken thymic transcriptome to acute heat stress and low dose lipopolysaccharide. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Zhang, J.; Schmidt, C.J.; Lamont, S.J. Transcriptome analysis reveals potential mechanisms underlying differential heart development in fast- and slow-growing broilers under heat stress. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Park, W.; Srikanth, K.; Lim, D.; Park, M.; Hur, T.; Kemp, S.; Dessie, T.; Kim, M.S.; Lee, S.-R.; te Pas, M.F.W.; et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of Ethiopian indigenous chickens from low and high altitudes under heat stress condition reveals differential immune response. Anim. Genet. 2019, 50, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Ma, D.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, M.; Feng, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, X. iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics analysis of the spleen reveals innate immunity and cell death pathways associated with heat stress in broilers (Gallus gallus). J. Proteom. 2019, 196, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Tang, X.; Meng, Q.; Gao, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, M. Label-free quantitative analysis of changes in broiler liver proteins under heat stress using SWATH-MS technology. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Kang, D.; Shim, K. Early heat exposure effects on proteomic changes of the broiler liver under acute heat stress. Animals 2021, 11, 1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Zheng, H.-T.; Zhuang, Z.-X.; Chen, C.-J.; Liao, H.-Y.; Chen, H.-L.; Hsueh, H.-C.; Chen, C.-F.; Chen, S.-E.; Huang, S.-Y. Effects of acute heat stress on protein expression and histone modification in the adrenal gland of male layer-type country chickens. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Wang, S.-H.; Cheng, C.-Y.; Chen, C.-J.; Chan, H.-L.; Chen, H.-H.; Tang, P.-C.; Chen, C.-F.; Lee, Y.-P.; Huang, S.-Y. Acute heat stress changes protein expression in the testes of a broiler-type strain of Taiwan country chickens. Anim. Biotechnol. 2019, 30, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Park, J.S.; Kang, D.R.; Shim, K.S. Proteomic changes in broiler liver by body weight differences under chronic heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 101794. [Google Scholar]
  170. Goto, T.; Mori, H.; Shiota, S.; Tomonaga, S. Metabolomics approach reveals the effects of breed and feed on the composition of chicken eggs. Metabolites 2019, 9, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zampiga, M.; Laghi, L.; Zhu, C.; Cartoni Mancinelli, A.; Mattioli, S.; Sirri, F. Breast muscle and plasma metabolomics profile of broiler chickens exposed to chronic heat stress conditions. Animals 2021, 15, 100275. [Google Scholar]
  172. Lee, D.; Lee, H.J.; Jung, D.Y.; Kim, H.-J.; Jang, A.; Jo, C. Effect of an animal-friendly raising environment on the quality, storage stability, and metabolomic profiles of chicken thigh meat. Food. Res. Int. 2022, 155, 111046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Lu, Z.; He, X.; Ma, B.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Jiang, Y.; Zhou, G.; Gao, F. Serum metabolomics study of nutrient metabolic variations in chronic heat-stressed broilers. Br. J. Nutr. 2018, 119, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Ouchi, Y.; Chowdhury, V.S.; Cockrem, J.F.; Bungo, T. Effects of thermal conditioning on changes in hepatic and muscular tissue associated with reduced heat production and body temperature in young chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 7, 610319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Yin, C.; Xia, B.; Tang, S.; Cao, A.; Liu, L.; Zhong, R.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H. The effect of exogenous bile acids on antioxidant status and gut microbiota in heat-stressed broiler chickens. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 747136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Xiong, Y.; Dong, S.; Zhao, X.; Guo, K.J.; Gasco, L.; Zoccarato, I. Gene expressions and metabolomic research on the effects of polyphenols from the involucres of Castanea mollissima Blume on heat-stressed broilers chicks. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 1869–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Brown, C.L.J.; Zaytsoff, S.J.M.; Montina, T.; Inglis, G.D. Corticosterone-mediated physiological stress alters liver, kidney, and breast muscle metabolomic profiles in chickens. Animals 2021, 11, 3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Different ambient temperature zones for poultry.
Figure 1. Different ambient temperature zones for poultry.
Vetsci 10 00591 g001
Figure 2. Heat stress response mechanism and effects in poultry.
Figure 2. Heat stress response mechanism and effects in poultry.
Vetsci 10 00591 g002
Figure 3. Genetic approaches to address heat stress in poultry.
Figure 3. Genetic approaches to address heat stress in poultry.
Vetsci 10 00591 g003
Table 2. Gene markers that play a role in the response to heat stress in poultry.
Table 2. Gene markers that play a role in the response to heat stress in poultry.
GenesExpressionHeat Control FunctionsReferences
HSPA2, HSPH1, HSP25Increaseprovide cellular protection and healing.Wang et al. [116]
RB1CC1, BAG3, CITED2Increasenegative regulation of apoptosis and programmed cell death.Wang et al. [116]; Luo et al. [123]
ID1DecreaseIt plays a role in embryonic development, tissue regeneration, and the control of cell proliferation.Luo et al. [123]
HSP90B1, HSPD1, PDIA2, HSPA5Increasestabilize and refold denatured proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondrial.De Maio and Vazquez [130]
HSF1, HSF3Increaseprotects cells from heat damage.Cedraz et al. [120]; De Maio and Vazquez [130]
HSP70, HSP90, HSP40Increasestabilize and refold denatured proteins, which is crucial for heat-stress cell survival.
SERPINH1 Increasefacilitate protein folding, reduce aggregation, and recover misfolded proteins.Wang et al. [125]; De Maio and Vazquez [130]
GLUT-2, FABP1, CD36Decreasedecrease feed intake and intestinal damage.Sun et al. [124]
TRMT1LIncreaserequire for redox homeostasis to ensure proper cellular proliferation and oxidative stress survival.Dewe et al. [131]; Walugembe et al. [132]
HS3ST5Unknowninvolve immunity and defense molecular functions.Walugembe et al. [132]; Szauter et al. [133]
EOMESIncreasestimulate immunity and control homeostasis.Walugembe et al. [132]; Zhang et al. [134]
NFAT5, NF-κBIncreasestimulate the expression of various proinflammatory cytokines.Tellechea et al. [126]; Zhang et al. [134]
MRPL42Increasedisrupt of DNA synthesis, transcription, RNA processing, and translation.Van Goor et al. [117]
EDN1Unknownaugment apoptosis in cancer cells induced by mild hyperthermia.Wang et al. [116]
ACSFUnknownalter in energy metabolism during heat stress.Tian et al. [135]
CYP4V2Increaseincrease fat deposition.Claire De’Andre et al. [136]
PLCB4Increaseassist in the regulation of metabolic energyNanaei et al. [118]
H1F0, ACYPIncreasereduce heat-induced apoptosis and repair DNA damage.Srikanth et al. [127]
PDKIncreasemaintain glucose and reduce heat from combustion.Luo et al. [123]; Kumar et al. [128]
Table 3. Using GWAS and SNP to characterize heat resistance in poultry.
Table 3. Using GWAS and SNP to characterize heat resistance in poultry.
Number of SNPsThe Number of the GenotypeBreedsTraitsReferences
23,098 SNPs192Taiwan indigenous chickensPathways associated with thermotoleranceZhuang et al. [144]
580,954 SNPs200Taiwan country chickensBody temperature changeZhuang et al. [145]
113,344 SNPs118White Leghorn layer line.Mortality in a white egg layer lineWolc et al. [146]
304,500 SNPs526Hy-Line BrownControlling traits related to NDV infection during heat stressSaelao et al. [147]
56,702 SNPs206Scaleless chickensFeather developmentWells et al. [148]
210,117 SNPs458broiler × FayoumiBody temperature, body weight, breast yield, and digestibilityVan Goor et al. [117]
261,509 SNPs374White LeghornsProduction traits, feed intake, body weight, digestibility, egg qualityRowland et al. [98]
Table 4. A study of OMICS technologies related to heat stress in poultry.
Table 4. A study of OMICS technologies related to heat stress in poultry.
TechniquesChicken BreedsAnalyzedGenesFunctionsReferences
GenomicsNative ChickensBlood and MuscleBVES, SMYD1, IL18, PDGFRA, NRP1, CORINThe circulatory system and blood vessel developmentGu et al. [152]
SIM2, NALCNCentral nervous system development
CLPTM1L, APP, CRADD, PARK2Related to apoptosis
AHR, ESRRG, FAS, UBE4BResponded to stimuli
FABP1Fatty acid metabolism
FayoumisBloodMAP3K3, SOCS2Cellular response to stress
suppressing cytokine signaling.
Van Goor et al. [117]
BloodMAPKBP1, SPON1Response to heat stressAsadollahi et al. [153]
Taiwan country chickensBloodCTL, H4R0, H4R2, H4R6Response to acute heat stressCheng et al. [154]
Native ChickensBloodSLC33A1, TSHR, NDUFS4Biomarkers to assess the adaptation to extreme environments.Shi et al. [155]
Hy-Line BrownBloodCAMK1d, CCDC3 TIRAP, ETS1, KIRREL3Associated with response to NDV during heat stressSaelao et al. [147]
TranscriptomicsRoss 308,
White Leghorn
Muscle and meat qualityJAK1, 2JAK2, TYK2Wound healing and tissue regenerationZahoor et al. [156]
Hy-LineLiver and MuscleHSD17B7, STARD4, ACSBG2, SCD, INSIG1,Response to changes in energy metabolismWang et al. [157]
Leghorns, FayoumisLung TissueIL17RELCytokine-mediated signalingSaelao et al. [158]
NOX4, PRDX1, RAB7BThe phagosome maturation pathway.
Leghorns, FayoumisBursa tissueH3K27ac, H3K4me1Associated with cell cycle and receptor signaling of lymphocytes.Chanthavixay et al. [159]
Ross 308BloodMYLK2, BDKRB1Calcium signaling pathway, Response to inflammation and tissue damageKim et al. [160]
Fayoumi, broilersThymusFGG, IL18, IL1R2, IL13RA2The immune response.Monson et al. [161]
Ross 708, IllinoisHeartBMP10, MYH7, ANGPT2Related to cardiovascular functionZhang et al. [162]
Ethiopian chickensHeart, breast muscle, spleenIFI27L2, F8, USP18, CEBPDImmune responsePark et al. [163]
ProteomicsBroilersSpleenIL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-αReveals innate immunityMa et al. [164]
CTSD, PARP3, IAP3Related to apoptosis
CHMP1B, TNFAIP3, PARP3, IAP3Related to necroptosis
Arbor AcresLiverHSP90AA1, LUM, PRKAA1, LYN, ABCA1Regulate the phagocytic ability of macrophagesTang et al. [165]
Ross chicksLiverCAT1, DLD, LDHB, ME1, PCK1, PDHA1Carbohydrate metabolismKang and Shim [166]
COX5A, COX6C, NDUFS3, UQCRC1Energy metabolism
ACO2, ACAT1Lipid metabolism
Taiwan country chickensAdrenal glandH3K27me3Body temperature homeostasisZheng et al. [167]
Taiwan country chickensTestisHSP90α, HSPA5, HSPA8Attenuate the testicular injuryWang et al. [168]
Ross-308LiverMRP-126, FABP7, AGMAT, FTH1, GSTA1, TUBB, ENO1, HSP60Response to oxidative stressPark et al. [169]
MetabolomicsRhode Island Red and AustralorpEgg yolk and albumen Investigated breed and feed effects on 10 egg traitsGoto et al. [170]
Ross 308Breast muscle and plasma Body energy homeostasis, growth performance, and meat quality traitsZampiga et al. [171]
Cobb chicksThigh meat Comparing the physicochemical properties, storage stability, and metabolomic profile of thigh meat from broilersLee et al. [172]
Broiler chickensSerum Nutrient metabolic variationsLu et al. [173]
Young Chickens (Chunky)Hepatic and muscular tissue Study was to clarify the effect of thermal conditioning at young ages on heat production and heat dissipation in chickensOuchi et al. [174]
Huaixiang chickensSerum Lipid metabolismGuo et al. [142]
Arbor AcresBile acids Investigating whether HS alters the composition of the bile acids pool and
whether exogenous bile acids can alleviate heat stress by its characteristics described above.
Yin et al. [175]
Arbor AcresSerum and jejunum mucosa Analyze some growth and antioxidative related gene expressions of jejunum mucosaXiong et al. [176]
White leghornKidney, liver, and breast muscle Effects of CORT, on the metabolome of chicken kidney, liver, and breast muscleBrown et al. [177]
Table 5. Comparison of genetic approaches for addressing heat stress in poultry.
Table 5. Comparison of genetic approaches for addressing heat stress in poultry.
Methods/CriteriaMinium Data RecordsBudget (US Dollars)Analysis
Accuracy
Analysis TimeSuitability of the Area to Use the TechniqueTraitsApplication
Conventional≥1000 records≥100045–70%1–2 daysUnderdeveloped and developing countriesAny traitsEasy to farm animals of all sizes.
Molecular≥50 sample/gene≥500045–70%1 weekUnderdeveloped and developing countriesAny traitsEasy to farm animals of all sizes.
Genomic selection≥300 genotyped animal records≥100,000>70%At least 1 monthDeveloping and developed countriesEmphasis on yield and fertility traits as well as cost-reduce traitsUse in case GP and GGP farm
OMICS technology≥5 samples≥100,000>90%At least 1 monthDeveloped countriesFunctional traits
Longevity traits
Use in case GGP farm
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Juiputta, J.; Chankitisakul, V.; Boonkum, W. Appropriate Genetic Approaches for Heat Tolerance and Maintaining Good Productivity in Tropical Poultry Production: A Review. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10100591

AMA Style

Juiputta J, Chankitisakul V, Boonkum W. Appropriate Genetic Approaches for Heat Tolerance and Maintaining Good Productivity in Tropical Poultry Production: A Review. Veterinary Sciences. 2023; 10(10):591. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10100591

Chicago/Turabian Style

Juiputta, Jiraporn, Vibuntita Chankitisakul, and Wuttigrai Boonkum. 2023. "Appropriate Genetic Approaches for Heat Tolerance and Maintaining Good Productivity in Tropical Poultry Production: A Review" Veterinary Sciences 10, no. 10: 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10100591

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop