Next Article in Journal
Morphological Changes of Glial Lamina Cribrosa of Rats Suffering from Chronic High Intraocular Pressure
Next Article in Special Issue
Challenges and Opportunities for Extracellular Vesicles in Clinical Oncology Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Kinetics of Biodiesel Production from Microalgae Using Microbubble Interfacial Technology
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Bioengineering
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/bioengineering9120740
bioengineering-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Extracellular Vesicles in Gynecologic Cancer Treatment

by
Renwen Zhang
†,
Yixing Zou
† and
Jing Luo
*
Institute of Reproductive Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Bioengineering 2022, 9(12), 740; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120740
Submission received: 27 September 2022 / Revised: 13 November 2022 / Accepted: 17 November 2022 / Published: 29 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extracellular Vesicle for Tumor Targeting Delivery System and Tumor Immunotherapy)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancer are the three most common gynecological malignancies that seriously threaten women’s health. With the development of molecular biology technology, immunotherapy and targeted therapy for gynecologic tumors are being carried out in clinical treatment. Extracellular vesicles are nanosized; they exist in various body fluids and play an essential role in intercellular communication and in the regulation of various biological process. Several studies have shown that extracellular vesicles are important targets in gynecologic cancer treatment as they promote tumor growth, progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, chemoresistance, and immune system escape. This article reviews the progress of research into extracellular vesicles in common gynecologic tumors and discusses the role of extracellular vesicles in gynecologic tumor treatment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The three most common gynecologic malignancies, cervical cancer (CC), endometrial cancer (EC), and ovarian cancer (OC), seriously threaten women’s health [1]. According to cancer statistics in 2021, CC was the fourth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of women dying from cancer with about 604,100 new cases and 341,831 deaths worldwide in 2020 [2]. EC is one of the most common gynecologic cancers in countries with high human development indexes. Its morbidity and mortality are increasing globally, with about 417,367 new cases and 97,370 deaths worldwide in 2020 [1,2,3]. OC is one of the most lethal gynecologic malignancies, with about 313,959 new cases and 207,252 deaths worldwide in 2020. Compared with healthy cells, tumor cells release more EVs and have different types of physicochemical properties [4]. With the development of gynecologic oncology, EVs are receiving more attention in gynecologic tumor treatment [5].
Extracellular vesicles(EVs) are lipid vesicles that can be secreted by most cells. The outer layer of an extracellular vesicle is wrapped by a layer of lipid membrane; its inner layer contains different types of nucleic acids and proteins, and it has a biologically active function in transmitting information between cells [6,7,8]. EVs are a collective term for multiple subtypes, which exist in body fluids such as blood, semen, urine, saliva, breast milk, amniotic fluid, and ascites [9,10]. According to the nomenclature of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles, researchers should consider using operational terms for EV subtypes that refer to the physical characteristics of the EVs, their biochemical composition, and descriptions of the conditions or cell of origin, in place of terms such as exosome and microvesicle that have contradictory definitions and inaccurate biosignatures [11]. EVs, which are composed of phospholipids, were first identified in platelets in 1967 and were considered as waste products of cells [12]. In the following decades, an increasing number of studies found a correlation between the active components carried by exosomes secreted in the pathological setting and the development and prognosis of the pathological state, which can be applied to the detection, prognosis, and guidance of the treatment of early cancers [13,14,15]. Techniques for the detection and purification of extracellular vesicles are also developing and improving. Therefore, in this paper, we review the research progress into EVs in common gynecologic tumors and discuss the research prospects and directions of EVs in gynecologic tumor treatment (Table 1).

2. Progress of the Research into EVs in the Diagnosis and Treatment of OC

OC is a common malignant tumor in gynecology. It has been reported that epithelial OC is the most common type of OC, and because 60 percent of cases are diagnosed at stage III or IV, it is associated with a poor prognosis [101]. The 5-year survival rate of stage I OC can reach 89%, and it decreases to 20% after the disease develops to stage IV [101]. Due to the lack of typical symptoms and specific biomarkers, most patients with OC are not diagnosed until the advanced stages, making it the gynecologic cancer with the highest mortality [102,103]. Although several novel drugs have been developed and applied in clinical trials, the clinical cure rate for patients with advanced OC has not been significantly improved [104,105,106]. Therefore, improving the diagnostic rate of early stage disease and clinical treatment effect is crucial to reducing the morbidity and mortality of OC. Moreover, exosomes derived from OC have the potential to become new biomarkers and therapeutic targets [107].

2.1. OC Development and Metastasis

EVs play a vital role in the development and metastasis of OC. OC cells release exosomes into the surrounding environment, increasing the intercellular interaction with the cells related to tumor development, metastasis, and invasion. Currently, known metastatic pathways include hematogenous metastasis, lymphatic metastasis, and transperitoneal metastasis [108,109,110]. The major pathways spread to the greater omentum through the peritoneal cavity, and OC cells are shed and accumulate in the peritoneal fluid [111]. Many biomolecules have been identified in the EVs secreted by OC. These molecules affect cell signaling and alter the tumor microenvironment by inducing tumor growth and metastasis [112]. Proteomic analysis of OC-derived EVs has shown that many proteins common to EVs from various origins, including TSG101, Alix, heat shock proteins, tetraspanins, rabs, annexins, and cytoskeletal proteins, may be associated with the biogenesis, structure, and trafficking of EVs [113]. Proteins (ATF2, MTA1, ROCK1/2, and sE-cad) [16,17], long noncoding RNAs (MALAT1, lncRNA ATB) [48,49], microRNAs (miR-130a, miR-205, and miR-141-3p) [26,27,28], and a protein receptor (PKR1) [25] in EVs promote tumor angiogenesis, increase the vascular permeability, and provide a nutrient supply for tumor growth and metastasis. Arginase 1 (ARG-1) and phosphatidylserine (PS) released by EVs inhibited T cell activation and proliferation and promoted OC growth in the form of immunosuppression [50,51]. Tumor-derived extracellular vesicular miR-940 induced M2-type polarization in macrophages [29], and the M2-type macrophage extracellular vesicular miR-221-3p inhibited cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B and promoted OC proliferation and metastasis [30]. High metastatic OC cells conferred high metastatic properties to low metastatic cancer cells via extracellular vesicular circRNA051239, leading to the enhanced proliferation, migration, and invasion of the recipient cells [45]. Ascites-derived EVs transferred miR-6780b-5p to OC cells, which was shown to promote the onset of epithelial mesenchymal transition and accelerate OC metastasis [31]. Extracellular vesicular miR-21-5p inhibited the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase 6 and increased the volume, size, and weight of OC in vivo [32].
These findings demonstrate the role of EVs in promoting tumor development and metastasis and as potential targets for subsequent treatment.

2.2. Diagnosis and Prognosis of OC

Early precise diagnosis and late dynamic follow-up of gynecologic tumors have always been important topics. Through fluid sampling, liquid biopsy is significant for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and efficacy assessment. EVs secreted by tumor cells are available in various body fluids and can be distinguished from non-cancerous EVs, leading to their potential to be cancer biomarkers and becoming a part of the standard test for liquid biopsies [114]. In addition, the stability of EVs gives them a higher specificity and sensitivity [115].
A study first reported the diagnostic value of extracellular vesicular miRNAs in OC in 2008, identifying the upregulation of eight specific miRNAs in the serum EVs of OC patients; the study found that miR-200a/b/c was an effective indicator to identify benign and malignant ovarian tumors [33]. Research has shown that the claudin-4 protein is released from OC cells via EVs, and the claudin-4 protein obtained from peripheral blood EVs had a sensitivity of 51% and specificity of 98% differentiating between healthy people and OC patients [18]. In addition, a clinical study sample showed patients with OC had a higher expression of plasma EVs miR-21, miR-100, miR-200b, miR-320, and miR-1290 and a lower expression of miR-16, miR-93, miR-126, and miR-223 [34,35]. Similar studies showed that miR-1260a, miR-7977, and miR-192-5p expression in plasma EVs was significantly reduced in OC patients and could be used as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers [36]. Moreover, researchers utilizing a microfluidic device discovered that HGF, STAT3, and IL-6 were highly elevated in the serum EVs of patients with early stage high-grade serous OC, compared to the benign and late-stage HGSOC [19]. In ovarian cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs)-derived EVs, transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) was upregulated compared to the normal omentum fibroblasts [20]. The extracellular vesicular miR-21-5p, miR-29a-3p, and miR-30d-5p were significantly overexpressed in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary compared with normal cells [37].
In addition, EVs have the potential to be prognostic predictors of OC. It has been shown that the levels of miR-200a, miR-200b, miR-200c, and miR-1290 were increased in the ascites of OC patients, and the level of miR-200b was associated with overall survival rate [38]. As an EV-associated gene, the expression of fibroblast growth factor 9 (FGF9) in ovarian epithelial tissue was lower than that in normal ovarian tissue, and the downregulated FGF9 showed good prognostic value in patients with OC [21]. The plasma EV-derived fragile site-associated tumor suppressor (FATS) was significantly decreased in OC patients; meanwhile, low levels of plasma EVs-derived FATS were closely associated with the Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV, high grade, ascites, elevated CA-125, and lymph node metastasis and prognosis of OC patients [22]. The circRNA circular forkhead box protein P1 (circFoxp1) in the serum EVs of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) was significantly increased, particularly in those who presented with cisplatin resistance. CircFoxp1 expression was positively correlated with the FIGO stage, primary tumor size, lymphatic metastasis, distant metastasis, residual tumor diameter, and clinical response in OC, and was an independent predictor of survival and disease recurrence for patients with EOC [46]. The expression of circRNA Cdr1a in serum EVs derived from OC patients was less expressed in the cisplatin-resistant group than in the cisplatin-sensitive group, and Cdr1as enhanced the cisplatin chemosensitivity of OC in vivo. Therefore, extracellular vesicular Cdr1a in serum can serve as a promising biomarker for cisplatin-resistant OC patients [47]. The OC patients with simultaneously low serum extracellular vesicular miR-484 expression and high serum CA-125 levels tended to suffer the worst clinical outcomes. The multivariate analysis confirmed that the low serum extracellular vesicular miR-484 level was an independent indicator [39]. Serum extracellular vesicular metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) expression was higher in OC patients than in the healthy control group. High levels of extracellular vesicular MALAT1 were associated with an advanced FIGO stage, a high histological grade, and lymph node metastasis, indicating that serum extracellular vesicular MALAT1 could be used as a biomarker in the prognosis prediction of OC [48].
These results suggest that the active substances carried by EVs have the potential to become biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of OC.

2.3. Treatment of OC

Surgery and chemotherapy are the most commonly used methods for the treatment of OC. Conventional targeted drug-controlled systems for oncology treatment cause serious side effects, including organ toxicity and the attenuation of host immune response. It is easy to develop drug resistance in the late stage of chemotherapy, which adversely affects the treatment [116,117]. Based on the properties of EVs, their clinical value can be developed by regulating their secretion to strengthen antitumor immunity, making use of their homing effect, and using them as carriers for drug transport.
It was shown that overexpression of the plasma extracellular vesicular circFoxp1 could promote OC cell proliferation and reduce cisplatin sensitivity, while knockdown of circFoxp1 inhibited OC cell proliferation and enhanced chemotherapy effects [46]. In addition, extracellular vesicular miR21 conferred chemoresistance and an aggressive phenotype in OC cells through its transfer from neighboring stromal cells, indicating that preventing the extracellular vesicular transfer of miR21 from stromal cells could be a new strategy for suppressing OC growth [40]. In addition, studies have shown that the macrophage miR-7 is transferred to EOC cells by EVs and inhibits the EGFR/AKT/ERK1/2 signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting OC metastasis and invasiveness [41]. The transmembrane family protein 205 was considered to contribute to cellular platinum resistance via increased extracellular vesicular efflux of platinum agents, and one study used the transmembrane family protein 205 inhibitor L-2663 to selectively reduce the secretion of EVs and block the platinum efflux from platinum-resistant OC cells as a target for combination therapy [118]. Researchers isolated EVs from fresh milk, wrapped the chemotherapeutic drug cisplatin, and introduced the drug into cisplatin-resistant OC, which allowed the drug to escape endosomal capture and improved the anticancer effect of drug delivery on the cisplatin-resistant OC. Compared with the pure cisplatin treatment, it achieved a better therapeutic effect [23]. The OC cells’ extracellular vesicular miR-155-5p prevented the formation of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment by downregulating PD-L1 and other immunosuppressive factors, thus inhibiting OC development and macrophage infiltration [42]. Similarly, by downregulating the tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs)-derived EVs miR-29a-3, PD-L1 expression and OC cell proliferation and immune escape were inhibited [43].
As carriers of drug transport, EVs have low immunogenicity and toxicity, high circulating and tissue stability, and inherent homing ability [119]. One study used tumor-derived EVs to encapsulate miR497 to achieve targeted therapy and reduce drug resistance [44]. Another study improved vascular normalization by targeting miR-484 with RGD-modified EVs, thereby enhancing the OC chemosensitivity [24].
The pre-metastatic ecotone is a microenvironment formed by EVs secreted by tumors before extensive metastasis. The therapeutic effect of OC can be achieved using the homing ability of exosomes on primary cancer cells [120]. Researchers embedded OC ascites-derived EVs into 3D stents and implanted them in animal models to mimic pre-metastatic ecological sites. As a preferential site for cancer cell metastasis, promoting tumor cell adhesion in a nonpharmacological mode of action can prolong OC survival [121].

3. Progress in the Treatment of EVs in CC

CC is the fourth most common cancer in women after breast, colorectal, and lung cancer, and is one of the leading causes of female death worldwide, with most deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries [2,122]. There are two common histological subtypes of CC: cervical squamous cell carcinoma and cervical adenoma [123]. The FIGO staging, which combines physical examination, endoscopic surgery, and imaging, is the most commonly used staging of CC [124]. High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is a common virus, and most people will be infected with it at some point in their lives [125]. Numerous studies have confirmed that persistent HPV infection is a necessary etiology for the formation of CC [126,127,128]. Although the detection and prevention of CC have made great progress, the survival rate of patients has not changed significantly [129]. Studies have demonstrated that EVs are associated with HPV infection and can play an essential role in different stages of CC development by promoting cell proliferation, mediating immune escape, and remodeling the tumor microenvironment. Therefore, they have become important biomarkers for CC diagnosis and treatment [65,69].

3.1. Development and Metastasis of CC

Zhang et al. found that the cervical squamous carcinoma cell-derived EVs miR-223 could target and transform the 3’-UTR of transforming growth factor beta receptor 3 and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A synthase 1, inhibiting their expression, and promoting tumor growth. They also induced monocytes/macrophages to secrete IL-6, and the secretion of IL-6 activates the signal transducer and activator of transcription3 in cervical squamous cancer cells, expressing more miR-233, and accelerating tumor growth [57].
The role of EVs in CC angiogenesis has also been reported. The extracellular vesicular miR-221-3p secreted by CC cells promoted the invasion, migration, and angiogenesis of CC microvascular endothelial cells through downregulation of MAPK10 and THBS2 expression [58,59]. CC adenocyte-derived EVs were found to deliver tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin and epidermal growth factor homology domains 2 (TIE2) to macrophages and promote tumor angiogenesis [52]. EVs from CC cells, especially from high-risk HPV-positive cells, promoted angiogenic responses in neighboring endothelial cells through the upregulation of the Hedgehog–GLI signaling pathway [130]. Cervical cancer-derived EVs were found to deliver miR-663b to human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and inhibit vinculin expression, thereby promoting vascular growth and tumor growth [61]. Other research showed that the extracellular vesicular miR-221-3p secreted by CC cells promoted lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis through the downregulation of vasohibin-1 signaling [60].
EVs from human HPV-positive cell lines were more effective in promoting neurite growth than EVs from HPV-negative cell lines. Further studies revealed that EVs derived from HPV-positive CC cell lines effectively stimulated neurite growth and mediated tumor innervation, affecting the tumor microenvironment [131]. The CC cell-derived extracellular vesicular miRNAs, including let-7d-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-378a-3p, miR-423-3p, miR-7-5p, miR-92a-3p, and miR-21-5p, were regulated by viral E6/E7 oncogenes in HPV-positive tumor cells, thus affecting the growth of HPV-positive cancer cells [132]. The CC cell-derived extracellular vesicular Wnt2B, a member of the Wnt protein family, promoted the transformation of normal fibroblasts to CAFs by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, thereby promoting the growth and development of primary tumors [53]. The cancer cell-derived extracellular vesicular miR-663b was endocytosed by CC cells after TGF-β1 exposure and inhibited the expression of mannoside acetylglucosaminyltransferase 3, thus accelerating the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) process and ultimately promoting local and distant metastasis [62]. HIV-infected patients face a higher risk of HPV infection and CC [122]. It has been shown that T cell-derived extracellular vesicular miR-155-5p infected with HIV promoted the proliferation, migration, and invasion of CC cells [63]. The long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) LINC01305 was mainly distributed in EVs and was transferred to recipient cells to enhance CC progression [76]. The lncRNA AGAP2-AS1 from EVs was involved in CC cell proliferation by regulating the miR-3064-5P/SIRT1 signaling pathway [77]. EVs secreted by CSCC cells were found to deliver miR-142-5p to lymphatic endothelial cells via the ARID2-DNMT1 -IFN-γ signaling pathway, inducing the expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, thereby inhibiting CD8+ T cells [64].

3.2. Diagnosis and Prognosis of CC

CC cell-derived EVs can pass through the interstitial cells and tissue fluids, thus collecting in body fluids such as cervical vaginal lavage and blood. They are potential markers for the diagnosis and prognosis of CC because they contain characteristic substances that reflect the physiological state of CC cells.
One study sequenced 121 plasma samples from healthy volunteers, CC patients, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia patients for extracellular vesicular miRNA. The study found that plasma extracellular vesicular let-7d-3p and miR-30d-5p were differentially expressed in plasma samples and normal tissues adjacent to the tumor. They are potential biomarkers for the noninvasive screening of CC and precancerous lesions [65]. Liu et al. collected cervical vaginal lavage fluid specimens and isolated EVs from 45 CC patients, 25 HPV-positive subjects, and 32 HPV-negative subjects. They found increasing levels of miRNA-21 and miRNA-146a expression in extracellular vesicular from CC patients [66]. Another study collected 90 cervical vaginal lavages (30 CC patients, 30 HPV-positive non-cancerous volunteers, and 30 HPV-negative non-cancerous volunteers) and the Hox transcript antisense intergenic RNA (HOTAIR), MALAT1, and maternally expressed gene 3 (MEG3) of extracellular vesicular lncRNAs were extracted for quantification. These three lncRNAs were found to be clustered in CC EVs, with significant differences in expression between CC patients and non-cancerous patients, and had the potential for the detection and diagnosis of CC [78]. One study measured the expression level of miRNA in the plasma EVs of 97 patients with CC and 87 normal controls, and it was found that miR-146a-5p, miR-151a-3p, and miR-2110 were upregulated in plasma EVs, which were potential biomarkers [67]. In another study, plasma from CC patients and healthy controls was sequenced for extracellular vesicular miRNA, and the miR-125a-5p expression levels were significantly lower in CC patients than in healthy controls, which could be considered as a diagnostic marker for CC [68].
Pauline et al. identified multiple nuclear transporter proteins in CC cell-derived EVs and found that the combination of KPNβ1, CRM1, KPNα2, CAS, RAN, IPO5, and TNPO1 as a biomarker group had the highest diagnostic power for CC [54]. One study analyzed the transcriptional profiles of CC EVs and found significant differences in the tumor-promoting content and enrichment of mRNA from protumor cells and HPV E6, and these transcripts may serve as potential exosome biomarkers for CC [55]. Some scholars screened plasma extracellular vesicular RNAs from CC patients before and during cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy). They found that miRNA (miR-142-3p), mRNAs (CXCL5, KIF2A, RGS18, APL6IP5, and DAPP1), and snoRNAs (SNORD17, SCARNA12, SNORA6, SNORA12, SCRNA1, SNORD97, SNORD62, and SNORD38A) in combination could clearly distinguish between normal and tumor specimens and could be used for the diagnosis of CC [75]. They also compared plasma extracellular vesicular miRNA before and during cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy similarly and found a significant correlation between plasma extracellular vesicular miRNA and the degree of early tumor progression and metastasis [133].
Some scholars researched the serum extracellular vesicular lncRNA DLX6-AS1 levels in 111 patients with CC, 60 patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and 110 healthy women; it was found that the lncRNA DLX6-AS1 levels were significantly elevated in patients with CC. In addition, high expression of lncRNA DLX6-AS1 was positively correlated with lymph node metastasis, differentiation, FIGO staging, and shorter survival. Patients with a high expression of lncRNA DLX6-AS1 were prone to recurrence of CC. Therefore, serum extracellular vesicular lncRNA DLX6-AS1 is a potential marker for predicting the overall survival of CC patients [79]. One study reported that the CC cell-derived extracellular vesicular miR-1468-5p was highly expressed in peripheral serum blood and positively correlated with PD-L1+ lymphatic vessels and PD-1+ CD8+ T cells, thus being valuable in determining the prognosis of CC [69].

3.3. Treatment of CC

Exosomes are important in the proliferation, angiogenesis, and cell metastasis of CC, and are effective in the corresponding treatment. Jin et al. used 5-Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of CC and found that the therapy inhibited miR-34a expression and increased high mobility group box1 (HMGB1) EVs’ secretion, thereby inhibiting cell proliferation and promoting apoptosis [56]. Another study demonstrated that mifepristone inhibited the CC HeLa cell-derived extracellular vesicles by upregulating their ISG15 protein expression levels, thereby inhibiting CC metastasis [134]. Zhang et al. found that the EVs of HPV-16 E7-pulsed DCs inhibited the migration and M1 polarization of macrophages, thereby blocking CC progression [135]. Yan et al. found that the extracellular vesicle miR-423-3p could inhibit macrophage M2 polarization, thereby suppressing CC cell progression and tumor growth [70].
Sensitivity to radiotherapy tends to decrease in the later stages of tumor treatment. Taking EVs as the target, some scholars have addressed the problem by inhibiting or increasing the release of EVs. Raji et al. found that miR-106a/b in cisplatin-resistant Hepatocarcinoma cells exosomes could reduce the resistance of CC cells to cisplatin by upregulating the level of silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1) in the CC cells [71]. Fang et al. found that miR-1323 was transferred by EVs derived from CAFs. Downregulation of miR-1323 inhibited cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and increased cell radiosensitivity in CC [72]. Konishi et al. found that miR-22-enriched EVs could alter the expression of the c-Myc binding protein and human telomerase reverse transcriptase genes in CC cells, thereby improving the sensitivity of in vitro CC radiotherapy [73]. Zhou et al. found that miR-320a expression was low in cisplatin-resistant CC. Myeloid Cell Leukemia Sequence 1, a cisplatin-resistant molecule, was regulated by engineered miR-320a EVs, thereby reducing resistance to cisplatin therapy in CC [74].
EVs can also act as drug carriers to enhance drug targeting and biocompatibility. Aqil et al. used milk-derived EVs as nanodrug carriers to compare the efficacy of the direct oral administration of curcumin with EV delivery for treating CC mice. They found EVs as carriers achieved better efficacy, and there were no significant biocompatibility issues [136].

4. Progress in the Treatment of EVs in EC

EC is the sixth most common cancer among women [2]. Over the past 30 years, the number of cases has increased by 132% [137]. Aging, obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, and Lynch syndrome are common risk factors for EC [138]. Tumor metastasis is the main cause of death caused by EC. Most patients with early diagnosis of EC have a good prognosis, while about 20% of patients with local metastases and 10% of patients with distant metastases have poor survival results [139]. Over the past few decades, the treatment of EC has hardly changed, with surgery remaining the preferred modality. Adjuvant therapies include adjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy, and there are still few treatments for EC metastases [139,140]. Therefore, diagnosis and treatment in the early stages of EC are effective ways to reduce EC mortality.

4.1. Development and Metastasis of EC

There is evidence that EVs are associated with the angiogenesis, growth, and development of EC cells and the metastatic potential of EC [141].
Song et al. found that plasma EVs from EC patients contained lectin galactoside-binding soluble 3-binding protein (LGALS3BP), which promoted tumor growth and angiogenesis through the PI3K/Akt/VEGFA signaling pathway [80]. Li’s study found that CAFs-derived EVs had reduced miR-148b expression compared to NFs, thereby increasing EC invasiveness [83]. Maida et al. found that EC cells delivered small regulatory RNAs to endometrial fibroblasts via EVs, and that EC cells may alter the peripheral stroma by transferring extracellular vesicular RNA [84]. Shi et al. found that miR-133a, which may regulate the downregulation of FOXL2 in EC tissues, was present in EC cell-derived EVs and could be delivered to normal endometrial cells [85]. Jia et al. found that EC cell-derived EVs deleted in lymphocytic leukemia 1 (DLEU1) accelerated EC progression by regulating the miR-381-3p/E2F3 pathway [98]. Another study showed that serum extracellular vesicular miR-27a-5p in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome enhanced the migration of EC cells, which led patients with polycystic ovary syndrome to EC progression [86]. Fan et al. found that the lncRNA nuclear-enriched abundant transcript 1 (NEAT1) existed in the EVs of CAFs, which interfered with the microenvironment of EC through the miR-26a/b-5p-STAT3-YKL-40 signaling pathway and promoted the development of EC [99]. Xiao et al. found that EC cells under hypoxic conditions promoted M2-like macrophage polarization through the delivery of extracellular vesicular miRNA-21, which altered the tumor immune microenvironment and could be a potential mechanism for promoting EC progression [87].

4.2. Diagnosis and Prognosis of EC

The current clinical screening of EC relies on a vaginal ultrasound and endometrial tissue biopsy, but both of them lack specificity [142]. Therefore, a method that can screen EC early and accurately is needed. Several studies analyzed biological fluids from EC patients and identified extracellular vesicular biomarkers with diagnostic and prognostic values.
Herrero et al. found that the Annexin 2 (ANXA2) protein was elevated in the plasma EVs of EC patients with specificity and sensitivity. Moreover, the ANXA2 levels were positively correlated with the risk of recurrence, demonstrating that ANXA2 was a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker [81]. Song et al. detected Serpin family A member 5 (SERPINA5) protein levels in plasma EVs. It was found that circulating plasma levels of the extracellular vesicles of SERPINA5 were elevated in EC patients, SERPINA5 expression was reduced in EC patients with distant metastases, and low SERPINA5 expression indicated poor survival [82]. Zhou et al. compared plasma from healthy subjects and EC patients and found that the extracellular vesicles of miR-15a-5p, miR-106b-5p, and miR107 were significantly upregulated in the plasma of EC patients compared to healthy subjects. In particular, the expression of the extracellular vesicles of miR-15a-5p was associated not only with the depth of the infiltration and invasiveness of EC, but also with the reproductive levels of testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, which is promising for the early diagnosis of EC [88]. Srivastava et al. compared urine-derived extracellular vesicular miRNA expression profiles from patients with EC and patients with symptoms of EC but no diagnosis and found that 54 of the 84 miRNAs studied were amplified in the qPCR, with hsa-miR-200c-3p as the most enriched, suggesting it as a biomarker for the diagnosis of EC [89]. Zheng et al. isolated EVs from the sera of 100 EC cases and 100 healthy control patients and extracted RNA from them. They found that increased extracellular vesicles of miRNA-95 and decreased miRNA-205 were associated with reduced overall survival in EC patients and may be prognostic biomarkers for EC patients [92]. Wang et al. sequenced plasma EVs from EC patients and normal humans. They found that the plasma-derived extracellular vesicular miR-26a-5p levels were significantly lower in EC patients, especially in patients with combined lymph node metastasis. Human lymphatic endothelial cells took up the extracellular vesicular miR-26a-5p secreted by EC cells, which induced lymphatic vessel formation by activating Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1. This can be used as a biomarker for early identification of lymph node metastasis risk in EC patients [90]. Fan et al. analyzed plasma miRNA from 93 patients with EC and 79 normal subjects. The miR-142-3p, miR-146a-5p, and miR-151a-5p were significantly elevated in the plasma of EC patients, and miR-151a-5p expression was also considerably elevated in EVs, showing a potential for the noninvasive diagnosis of EC [91].

4.3. Treatment of EC

Exosomes play an essential role in the development and progression of EC and provide new ideas for the treatment of EC. Song et al. found that overexpression of the SERPINA5 protein in plasma EVs could inhibit the metastatic potential of EC cells in vivo by inhibiting the integrin β1/FAK signaling pathway. In addition, the extracellular vesicular SERPINA5 protein hindered tumor growth and metastasis in xenograft models. Thus, the SERPINA5 EVs may be a new strategy for treating metastatic EC [82]. Wang et al. found that upregulation of miR-192-5p by TAMs-derived EVs inhibited the IRAK1/NF-kB signaling pathway, effectively promoting apoptosis and impeding EMT in EC cells, thereby inhibiting EC progression. The results proved that the miR-192-5P-modified TAMs-derived EVs may be a potential target for EC therapy [93]. Mojtahedin et al. used LED irradiation to alter exosome ontogenesis, angiogenic capacity, and metastatic behavior to produce tumor-suppressive effects on Ishikawa cells [143]. Gu et al. found that TAMs-derived EVs acted as carriers of hsa_circ_0001610, transferring hsa_circ_0001610 to EC cells and releasing cyclin B1 expression through the adsorption of miR-139-5p, thereby reducing the radiosensitivity of EC cells. This suggests that hsa_circ_0001610 could serve as a potential intervention for EC radioresistance [100]. Park et al. used Aurea helianthus extract to induce extracellular vesicular miRNAs in EC cells to reach the goal of prevention and treatment of EC in five aspects: inhibiting migration and invasion, increasing drug sensitivity, reducing inflammation, and promoting cellular senescence [144]. Zhou et al. showed in vivo and in vitro studies where CD45RO-CD8+ T cell-derived EVs released high levels of miR-765 and modulated the miR-765/PLP2 signaling pathway to inhibit the pro-tumorigenic effects of estrogen on uterine corpus EC. Zhang et al. found that the miR-320a EVs secreted by CAFs inhibited the proliferation of Ishikawa and HEC-1B cells by downregulating the hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha/VEGFA signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting EC proliferation and improving the sensitivity of radiotherapy [94].
More scholars exploited the tumor homing effect of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUCMSCs) to explore the treatment of EC. Pan et al. investigated hUCMSCs-derived extracellular vesicular miRNA-503-3p and found that upregulation of EVs could inhibit mesoderm-specific transcript, thereby inhibiting EC growth [95]. Li et al. found that miR-302a delivered by hUCMSC-derived EV significantly reduced EC cell proliferation and migration by reducing the expression of AKT, reducing the phosphorylation of AKT, and downregulating the cyclin D1 expression, which may be an effective treatment for EV [96]. Liang et al. found that hUCMSCs-derived EVs delivered miR-499a-5p as a vector, which could be effectively taken up by Ishikawa cells and upregulate miR-499a-5p expression. miR-499a-5p EVs inhibited the proliferation of Ishikawa and HUVEC cells through VAV3 gene targeting. Moreover, they inhibited the pro-angiogenic ability of HUVECs cells, thus inhibiting tumor growth and angiogenesis in EC and exerting tumor suppressive effects [97].

5. Conclusions

Gynecological malignancies, especially OC, CC, and EC, cause high economic burdens and physical damage to patients across the globe. With the progress in the medical field, the diagnosis and treatment of gynecological malignant tumors are constantly developing and improving. EVs widely exist in living organisms, whose biological functions are gradually being recognized, and research involving their role in diagnosis and their therapeutic applications is being carried out. Understanding how EVs serve as biological markers, tumor-promoting factors, tumor-suppressing factors, and targeting vectors in the development of gynecologic tumor diseases can help to explain their biological functions more comprehensively and objectively and provide clinical assistance in the diagnosis and treatment of gynecologic tumors.
Although vesicle diagnosis and treatment techniques have shown great diagnostic and therapeutic potential for gynecologic tumors, research in the field is still at the exploratory stage. In addition, the immaturity of the research methods hinders its translation into clinical application. A deeper understanding of the formation and regulatory mechanisms of EVs will facilitate a better understanding of the biological functions, heterogeneity, and functional diversity of EVs, as well as efficiently prepare and improve unified and standardized EVs, therefore better realizing their clinical significance.

Author Contributions

R.Z. and Y.Z. contributed to this article equally. R.Z. and Y.Z. reviewed the literature and wrote the manuscript. J.L. designed the original idea and helped in reviewing the literature. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022, 72, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lortet-Tieulent, J.; Ferlay, J.; Bray, F.; Jemal, A. International Patterns and Trends in Endometrial Cancer Incidence, 1978–2013. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2018, 110, 354–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Marar, C.; Starich, B.; Wirtz, D. Extracellular vesicles in immunomodulation and tumor progression. Nat. Immunol. 2021, 22, 560–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hoshino, A.; Kim, H.S.; Bojmar, L.; Gyan, K.E.; Cioffi, M.; Hernandez, J.; Zambirinis, C.P.; Rodrigues, G.; Molina, H.; Heissel, S.; et al. Extracellular Vesicle and Particle Biomarkers Define Multiple Human Cancers. Cell 2020, 182, 1044–1061.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Théry, C.; Zitvogel, L.; Amigorena, S. Exosomes: Composition, biogenesis and function. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 2, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tkach, M.; Théry, C. Communication by Extracellular Vesicles: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go. Cell 2016, 164, 1226–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Tian, X.; Shen, H.; Li, Z.; Wang, T.; Wang, S. Tumor-derived exosomes, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and tumor microenvironment. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Neven, K.Y.; Nawrot, T.S.; Bollati, V. Extracellular Vesicles: How the External and Internal Environment Can Shape Cell-To-Cell Communication. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2017, 4, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Raposo, G.; Stoorvogel, W. Extracellular vesicles: Exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 200, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Théry, C.; Witwer, K.W.; Aikawa, E.; Alcaraz, M.J.; Anderson, J.D.; Andriantsitohaina, R.; Antoniou, A.; Arab, T.; Archer, F.; Atkin-Smith, G.K.; et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2018, 7, 1535750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wolf, P. The nature and significance of platelet products in human plasma. Br. J. Haematol. 1967, 13, 269–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, I.-H.; Xue, L.; Hsu, C.-C.; Paez, J.S.P.; Pan, L.; Andaluz, H.; Wendt, M.K.; Iliuk, A.B.; Zhu, J.-K.; Tao, W.A. Phosphoproteins in extracellular vesicles as candidate markers for breast cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 3175–3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Syn, N.; Wang, L.; Sethi, G.; Thiery, J.-P.; Goh, B.-C. Exosome-Mediated Metastasis: From Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition to Escape from Immunosurveillance. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2016, 37, 606–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wan, M.; Ning, B.; Spiegel, S.; Lyon, C.J.; Hu, T.Y. Tumor-derived exosomes (TDEs): How to avoid the sting in the tail. Med. Res. Rev. 2020, 40, 385–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yi, H.; Ye, J.; Yang, X.-M.; Zhang, L.-W.; Zhang, Z.-G.; Chen, Y.-P. High-grade ovarian cancer secreting effective exosomes in tumor angiogenesis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 5062–5070. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tang, M.K.S.; Yue, P.Y.K.; Ip, P.P.; Huang, R.-L.; Lai, H.-C.; Cheung, A.N.Y.; Tse, K.Y.; Ngan, H.Y.S.; Wong, A.S.T. Soluble E-cadherin promotes tumor angiogenesis and localizes to exosome surface. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Li, J.; Sherman-Baust, C.A.; Tsai-Turton, M.; Bristow, R.E.; Roden, R.B.; Morin, P.J. Claudin-containing exosomes in the peripheral circulation of women with ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer 2009, 9, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Dorayappan, K.D.P.; Gardner, M.L.; Hisey, C.L.; Zingarelli, R.A.; Smith, B.Q.; Lightfoot, M.D.S.; Gogna, R.; Flannery, M.M.; Hays, J.; Hansford, D.J.; et al. A microfluidic chip enables isolation of exosomes and establishment of their protein profiles and associated signaling pathways in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 3503–3513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, W.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Li, M.; Cao, C.; Tan, J.; Ma, D.; Gao, Q. TGFβ1 in fibroblasts-derived exosomes promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition of ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 96035–96047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Xu, Z.; Cai, Y.; Liu, W.; Kang, F.; He, Q.; Hong, Q.; Zhang, W.; Li, J.; Yan, Y.; Peng, J. Downregulated exosome-associated gene FGF9 as a novel diagnostic and prognostic target for ovarian cancer and its underlying roles in immune regulation. Aging 2022, 14, 1822–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hu, R.; Chen, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, B.; Pei, H.; Tu, F.; Liu, J.; Yu, H. Plasma exosome-derived fragile site-associated tumor suppressor as a powerful prognostic predictor for patients with ovarian cancer. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2022, 22, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhou, G.; Gu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Liu, W.; Xu, B.; Zhou, F.; Zhang, M.; Hua, K.; Wu, L.; et al. Exosome Mediated Cytosolic Cisplatin Delivery Through Clathrin-Independent Endocytosis and Enhanced Anti-cancer Effect via Avoiding Endosome Trapping in Cisplatin-Resistant Ovarian Cancer. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 810761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhao, Z.; Shuang, T.; Gao, Y.; Lu, F.; Zhang, J.; He, W.; Qu, L.; Chen, B.; Hao, Q. Targeted delivery of exosomal miR-484 reprograms tumor vasculature for chemotherapy sensitization. Cancer Lett. 2022, 530, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, X.; Sheng, Y.; Li, B.; Wang, Q.; Liu, X.; Han, J. Ovarian cancer derived PKR1 positive exosomes promote angiogenesis by promoting migration and tube formation in vitro. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2021, 39, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, Z.; Yan-Qing, W.; Xiao, Y.; Shi-Yi, L.; Meng-Qin, Y.; Shu, X.; Dong-Yong, Y.; Ya-Jing, Z.; Yan-Xiang, C. Exosomes secreted by chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells promote angiogenesis. J. Ovarian Res. 2021, 14, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. He, L.; Zhu, W.; Chen, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, X. Ovarian cancer cell-secreted exosomal miR-205 promotes metastasis by inducing angiogenesis. Theranostics 2019, 9, 8206–8220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Masoumi-Dehghi, S.; Babashah, S.; Sadeghizadeh, M. microRNA-141-3p-containing small extracellular vesicles derived from epithelial ovarian cancer cells promote endothelial cell angiogenesis through activating the JAK/STAT3 and NF-κB signaling pathways. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2020, 14, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, X.; Ying, X.; Wang, X.; Wu, X.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, X. Exosomes derived from hypoxic epithelial ovarian cancer deliver microRNA-940 to induce macrophage M2 polarization. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 522–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Li, X.; Tang, M. Exosomes released from M2 macrophages transfer miR-221-3p contributed to EOC progression through targeting CDKN1B. Cancer Med. 2020, 9, 5976–5988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cai, J.; Gong, L.; Li, G.; Guo, J.; Yi, X.; Wang, Z. Exosomes in ovarian cancer ascites promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition of ovarian cancer cells by delivery of miR-6780b-5p. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Mu, J.; Yang, D.; Gu, X.; Zhang, J. Exosomal miR-21-5p contributes to ovarian cancer progression by regulating CDK6. Hum. Cell 2021, 34, 1185–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Taylor, D.D.; Gercel-Taylor, C. MicroRNA signatures of tumor-derived exosomes as diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2008, 110, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pan, C.; Stevic, I.; Müller, V.; Ni, Q.; Oliveira-Ferrer, L.; Pantel, K.; Schwarzenbach, H. Exosomal microRNAs as tumor markers in epithelial ovarian cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2018, 12, 1935–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Jeon, H.; Seo, S.M.; Kim, T.W.; Ryu, J.; Kong, H.; Jang, S.H.; Jang, Y.S.; Kim, K.S.; Kim, J.H.; Ryu, S.; et al. Circulating Exosomal miR-1290 for Diagnosis of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 288–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, L.; Wang, K.; Li, L.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, F.; Chen, J.; Wang, S. Plasma exosomal miR-1260a, miR-7977 and miR-192-5p as diagnostic biomarkers in epithelial ovarian cancer. Future Oncol. 2022, 18, 2919–2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Horie, K.; Nanashima, N.; Yokoyama, Y.; Yoshioka, H.; Watanabe, J. Exosomal MicroRNA as Biomarkers for Diagnosing or Monitoring the Progression of Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Study. Molecules 2022, 27, 3953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Záveský, L.; Jandáková, E.; Weinberger, V.; Minář, L.; Hanzíková, V.; Dušková, D.; Drábková, L.Z.; Svobodová, I.; Hořínek, A. Ascites-Derived Extracellular microRNAs as Potential Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer. Reprod. Sci. 2019, 26, 510–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, W.; Su, X.; Li, S.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zeng, H. Low serum exosomal miR-484 expression predicts unfavorable prognosis in ovarian cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2020, 27, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Au Yeung, C.L.; Co, N.-N.; Tsuruga, T.; Yeung, T.-L.; Kwan, S.-Y.; Leung, C.S.; Li, Y.; Lu, E.S.; Kwan, K.; Wong, K.-K.; et al. Exosomal transfer of stroma-derived miR21 confers paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer cells through targeting APAF1. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hu, Y.; Li, D.; Wu, A.; Qiu, X.; Di, W.; Huang, L.; Qiu, L. TWEAK-stimulated macrophages inhibit metastasis of epithelial ovarian cancer via exosomal shuttling of microRNA. Cancer Lett. 2017, 393, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, X.; Wang, S.; Mu, W.; Barry, J.; Han, A.; Carpenter, R.L.; Jiang, B.-H.; Peiper, S.C.; Mahoney, M.G.; Aplin, A.E.; et al. Reactive oxygen species reprogram macrophages to suppress antitumor immune response through the exosomal miR-155-5p/PD-L1 pathway. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 41, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lu, L.; Ling, W.; Ruan, Z. TAM-derived extracellular vesicles containing microRNA-29a-3p explain the deterioration of ovarian cancer. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2021, 25, 468–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, L.; He, D.; Guo, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Ru, D.; Wang, L.; Gong, K.; Liu, F.; Duan, Y.; Li, H. Exosome-liposome hybrid nanoparticle codelivery of TP and miR497 conspicuously overcomes chemoresistant ovarian cancer. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ma, R.; Ye, X.; Cheng, H.; Cui, H.; Chang, X. Tumor-derived exosomal circRNA051239 promotes proliferation and migration of epithelial ovarian cancer. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021, 13, 1125–1139. [Google Scholar]
  46. Luo, Y.; Gui, R. Circulating exosomal circFoxp1 confers cisplatin resistance in epithelial ovarian cancer cells. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2020, 31, e75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhao, Z.; Ji, M.; Wang, Q.; He, N.; Li, Y. Circular RNA Cdr1as Upregulates SCAI to Suppress Cisplatin Resistance in Ovarian Cancer via miR-1270 Suppression. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2019, 18, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Qiu, J.-J.; Lin, X.-J.; Tang, X.-Y.; Zheng, T.-T.; Lin, Y.-Y.; Hua, K.-Q. Exosomal Metastasis-Associated Lung Adenocarcinoma Transcript 1 Promotes Angiogenesis and Predicts Poor Prognosis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 14, 1960–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Yuan, D.; Guo, T.; Zhu, D.; Ge, H.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, A.; Wang, X.; Cao, X.; He, C.; Qian, H.; et al. Exosomal lncRNA ATB Derived from Ovarian Cancer Cells Promotes Angiogenesis via Regulating miR-204-3p/TGFβR2 Axis. Cancer Manag. Res. 2022, 14, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kelleher, R.J.; Balu-Iyer, S.; Loyall, J.; Sacca, A.J.; Shenoy, G.N.; Peng, P.; Iyer, V.; Fathallah, A.M.; Berenson, C.S.; Wallace, P.K.; et al. Extracellular Vesicles Present in Human Ovarian Tumor Microenvironments Induce a Phosphatidylserine-Dependent Arrest in the T-cell Signaling Cascade. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2015, 3, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Czystowska-Kuzmicz, M.; Sosnowska, A.; Nowis, D.; Ramji, K.; Szajnik, M.; Chlebowska-Tuz, J.; Wolinska, E.; Gaj, P.; Grazul, M.; Pilch, Z.; et al. Small extracellular vesicles containing arginase-1 suppress T-cell responses and promote tumor growth in ovarian carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Du, S.; Qian, J.; Tan, S.; Li, W.; Liu, P.; Zhao, J.; Zeng, Y.; Xu, L.; Wang, Z.; Cai, J. Tumor cell-derived exosomes deliver TIE2 protein to macrophages to promote angiogenesis in cervical cancer. Cancer Lett. 2022, 529, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liang, L.-J.; Yang, Y.; Wei, W.-F.; Wu, X.-G.; Yan, R.-M.; Zhou, C.-F.; Chen, X.-J.; Wu, S.; Wang, W.; Fan, L.-S. Tumor-secreted exosomal Wnt2B activates fibroblasts to promote cervical cancer progression. Oncogenesis 2021, 10, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Van der Watt, P.J.; Okpara, M.O.; Wishart, A.; Parker, M.I.; Soares, N.C.; Blackburn, J.M.; Leaner, V.D. Nuclear transport proteins are secreted by cancer cells and identified as potential novel cancer biomarkers. Int. J. Cancer 2022, 150, 347–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bhat, A.; Yadav, J.; Thakur, K.; Aggarwal, N.; Chhokar, A.; Tripathi, T.; Singh, T.; Jadli, M.; Veerapandian, V.; Bharti, A.C. Transcriptome analysis of cervical cancer exosomes and detection of HPVE6*I transcripts in exosomal RNA. BMC Cancer 2022, 22, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jin, Y.; Guan, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Zeng, R.; Xu, L.; Cao, P. ALA-PDT promotes HPV-positive cervical cancer cells apoptosis and DCs maturation via miR-34a regulated HMGB1 exosomes secretion. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2018, 24, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, J.; Jiang, M.; Qian, L.; Lin, X.; Song, W.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, Y. The STAT3-miR-223-TGFBR3/HMGCS1 axis modulates the progression of cervical carcinoma. Mol. Oncol. 2020, 14, 2313–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, L.; Li, H.; Yuan, M.; Li, M.; Zhang, S. Cervical Cancer Cells-Secreted Exosomal microRNA-221-3p Promotes Invasion, Migration and Angiogenesis of Microvascular Endothelial Cells in Cervical Cancer by Down-Regulating MAPK10 Expression. Cancer Manag. Res. 2019, 11, 10307–10319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Wu, X.-G.; Zhou, C.-F.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Yan, R.-M.; Wei, W.-F.; Chen, X.-J.; Yi, H.-Y.; Liang, L.-J.; Fan, L.-S.; Liang, L.; et al. Cancer-derived exosomal miR-221-3p promotes angiogenesis by targeting THBS2 in cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Angiogenesis 2019, 22, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhou, C.-F.; Ma, J.; Huang, L.; Yi, H.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Wu, X.-G.; Yan, R.-M.; Liang, L.; Zhong, M.; Yu, Y.-H.; et al. Cervical squamous cell carcinoma-secreted exosomal miR-221-3p promotes lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis by targeting VASH1. Oncogene 2019, 38, 1256–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. You, X.; Sun, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, A.; Liu, L.; Han, S.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, J.; Guo, L.; et al. Cervical cancer-derived exosomal miR-663b promotes angiogenesis by inhibiting vinculin expression in vascular endothelial cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2021, 21, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. You, X.; Wang, Y.; Meng, J.; Han, S.; Liu, L.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, J.; Sun, S.; Li, X.; Sun, W.; et al. Exosomal miR-663b exposed to TGF-β1 promotes cervical cancer metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting MGAT3. Oncol. Rep. 2021, 45, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Li, H.; Chi, X.; Li, R.; Ouyang, J.; Chen, Y. HIV-1-infected cell-derived exosomes promote the growth and progression of cervical cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 15, 2438–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Zhou, C.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, R.; Huang, L.; Mellor, A.L.; Yang, Y.; Chen, X.; Wei, W.; Wu, X.; Yu, L.; et al. Exosome-derived miR-142-5p remodels lymphatic vessels and induces IDO to promote immune privilege in the tumour microenvironment. Cell Death Differ. 2021, 28, 715–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zheng, M.; Hou, L.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wang, F.; Cheng, B.; Wang, W.; Lu, B.; Liu, P.; Lu, W.; et al. Exosomal let-7d-3p and miR-30d-5p as diagnostic biomarkers for non-invasive screening of cervical cancer and its precursors. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Liu, J.; Sun, H.; Wang, X.; Yu, Q.; Li, S.; Yu, X.; Gong, W. Increased exosomal microRNA-21 and microRNA-146a levels in the cervicovaginal lavage specimens of patients with cervical cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 758–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Ma, G.; Song, G.; Zou, X.; Shan, X.; Liu, Q.; Xia, T.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, W. Circulating plasma microRNA signature for the diagnosis of cervical cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2019, 26, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lv, A.; Tu, Z.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Xie, B. Circulating exosomal miR-125a-5p as a novel biomarker for cervical cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2021, 21, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhou, C.; Wei, W.; Ma, J.; Yang, Y.; Liang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Huang, L.; Wang, W.; et al. Cancer-secreted exosomal miR-1468-5p promotes tumor immune escape via the immunosuppressive reprogramming of lymphatic vessels. Mol. Ther. 2021, 29, 1512–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yan, X.; Zhang, S.; Jia, J.; Yang, J.; Song, Y.; Duan, H. Exosomal MiR-423-3p inhibits macrophage M2 polarization to suppress the malignant progression of cervical cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2022, 235, 153882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Raji, G.R.; Sruthi, T.V.; Edatt, L.; Haritha, K.; Sharath Shankar, S.; Sameer Kumar, V.B. Horizontal transfer of miR-106a/b from cisplatin resistant hepatocarcinoma cells can alter the sensitivity of cervical cancer cells to cisplatin. Cell Signal. 2017, 38, 146–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fang, F.; Guo, C.; Zheng, W.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, L. Exosome-Mediated Transfer of miR-1323 from Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Confers Radioresistance of C33A Cells by Targeting PABPN1 and Activating Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway in Cervical Cancer. Reprod. Sci. 2022, 29, 1809–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Konishi, H.; Hayashi, M.; Taniguchi, K.; Nakamura, M.; Kuranaga, Y.; Ito, Y.; Kondo, Y.; Sasaki, H.; Terai, Y.; Akao, Y.; et al. The therapeutic potential of exosomal miR-22 for cervical cancer radiotherapy. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2020, 21, 1128–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhou, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Q.; Zhu, X.; Jiang, P.; Jiang, N.; Zhao, W.; Li, B. Engineered Exosomes-Mediated Transfer of hsa-miR-320a Overcomes Chemoresistance in Cervical Cancer Cells via Targeting MCL1. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 883445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Cho, O.; Kim, D.-W.; Cheong, J.-Y. Screening Plasma Exosomal RNAs as Diagnostic Markers for Cervical Cancer: An Analysis of Patients Who Underwent Primary Chemoradiotherapy. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Huang, X.; Liu, X.; Du, B.; Liu, X.; Xue, M.; Yan, Q.; Wang, X.; Wang, Q. LncRNA LINC01305 promotes cervical cancer progression through KHSRP and exosome-mediated transfer. Aging 2021, 13, 19230–19242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, M.; Wang, J.; Ma, H.; Gao, L.; Zhao, K.; Huang, T. Extracellular Vesicles Long Non-Coding RNA AGAP2-AS1 Contributes to Cervical Cancer Cell Proliferation Through Regulating the miR-3064-5p/SIRT1 Axis. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 684477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, J.; Liu, S.-C.; Luo, X.-H.; Tao, G.-X.; Guan, M.; Yuan, H.; Hu, D.-K. Exosomal Long Noncoding RNAs are Differentially Expressed in the Cervicovaginal Lavage Samples of Cervical Cancer Patients. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2016, 30, 1116–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Ding, X.-Z.; Zhang, S.-Q.; Deng, X.-L.; Qiang, J.-H. Serum Exosomal lncRNA DLX6-AS1 Is a Promising Biomarker for Prognosis Prediction of Cervical Cancer. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2021, 20, 1533033821990060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Song, Y.; Wang, M.; Tong, H.; Tan, Y.; Hu, X.; Wang, K.; Wan, X. Plasma exosomes from endometrial cancer patients contain LGALS3BP to promote endometrial cancer progression. Oncogene 2021, 40, 633–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Herrero, C.; de la Fuente, A.; Casas-Arozamena, C.; Sebastian, V.; Prieto, M.; Arruebo, M.; Abalo, A.; Colás, E.; Moreno-Bueno, G.; Gil-Moreno, A.; et al. Extracellular Vesicles-Based Biomarkers Represent a Promising Liquid Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Song, Y.; Ye, L.; Tan, Y.; Tong, H.; Lv, Z.; Wan, X.; Li, Y. Therapeutic exosomes loaded with SERPINA5 attenuated endometrial cancer cell migration via the integrin β1/FAK signaling pathway. Cell. Oncol. 2022, 45, 861–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Li, B.-L.; Lu, W.; Qu, J.-J.; Ye, L.; Du, G.-Q.; Wan, X.-P. Loss of exosomal miR-148b from cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes endometrial cancer cell invasion and cancer metastasis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 2943–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Maida, Y.; Takakura, M.; Nishiuchi, T.; Yoshimoto, T.; Kyo, S. Exosomal transfer of functional small RNAs mediates cancer-stroma communication in human endometrium. Cancer Med. 2016, 5, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Shi, S.; Tan, Q.; Feng, F.; Huang, H.; Liang, J.; Cao, D.; Wang, Z. Identification of core genes in the progression of endometrial cancer and cancer cell-derived exosomes by an integrative analysis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Che, X.; Jian, F.; Chen, C.; Liu, C.; Liu, G.; Feng, W. PCOS serum-derived exosomal miR-27a-5p stimulates endometrial cancer cells migration and invasion. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2020, 64, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Xiao, L.; He, Y.; Peng, F.; Yang, J.; Yuan, C. Endometrial Cancer Cells Promote M2-Like Macrophage Polarization by Delivering Exosomal miRNA-21 under Hypoxia Condition. J. Immunol. Res. 2020, 2020, 9731049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhou, L.; Wang, W.; Wang, F.; Yang, S.; Hu, J.; Lu, B.; Pan, Z.; Ma, Y.; Zheng, M.; Zhou, L.; et al. Plasma-derived exosomal miR-15a-5p as a promising diagnostic biomarker for early detection of endometrial carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 2021, 20, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Srivastava, A.; Moxley, K.; Ruskin, R.; Dhanasekaran, D.N.; Zhao, Y.D.; Ramesh, R. A Non-invasive Liquid Biopsy Screening of Urine-Derived Exosomes for miRNAs as Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer Patients. AAPS J. 2018, 20, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, J.; Gong, X.; Yang, L.; Li, L.; Gao, X.; Ni, T.; Yang, X.; Fan, Q.; Sun, X.; Wang, Y. Loss of exosomal miR-26a-5p contributes to endometrial cancer lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis. Clin. Transl. Med. 2022, 12, e846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fan, X.; Cao, M.; Liu, C.; Zhang, C.; Li, C.; Cheng, W.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, W. Three plasma-based microRNAs as potent diagnostic biomarkers for endometrial cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2021, 31, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zheng, W.; Yang, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X. Exosomal miRNA-93 and miRNA-205 expression in endometrial cancer. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2020, 32, 1111–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wang, Y.; Ma, H.; Li, Y.; Su, R. MiR-192-5p-Modified Tumor-Associated Macrophages-Derived Exosome Suppressed Endometrial Cancer Progression Through Targeting IRAK1/NF-κB Signaling. Reprod. Sci. 2022, 29, 436–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhang, N.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Shen, W. Extracellular vesicle encapsulated microRNA-320a inhibits endometrial cancer by suppression of the HIF1α/VEGFA axis. Exp. Cell Res. 2020, 394, 112113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Pan, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Yan, P.; Zhang, H. Human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomal microRNA-503-3p inhibits progression of human endometrial cancer cells through downregulating MEST. Cancer Gene Ther. 2022, 29, 1130–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Li, X.; Liu, L.; Yao, J.; Wang, K.; Ai, H. Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Inhibit Endometrial Cancer Cell Proliferation and Migration through Delivery of Exogenous miR-302a. Stem Cells Int. 2019, 2019, 8108576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Jing, L.; Hua, X.; Yuanna, D.; Rukun, Z.; Junjun, M. Exosomal miR-499a-5p Inhibits Endometrial Cancer Growth and Metastasis via Targeting VAV3. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020, 12, 13541–13552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jia, J.; Guo, S.; Zhang, D.; Tian, X.; Xie, X. Exosomal-lncRNA DLEU1 Accelerates the Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion of Endometrial Carcinoma Cells by Regulating microRNA-E2F3. OncoTargets Ther. 2020, 13, 8651–8663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Fan, J.-T.; Zhou, Z.-Y.; Luo, Y.-L.; Luo, Q.; Chen, S.-B.; Zhao, J.-C.; Chen, Q.-R. Exosomal lncRNA NEAT1 from cancer-associated fibroblasts facilitates endometrial cancer progression via miR-26a/b-5p-mediated STAT3/YKL-40 signaling pathway. Neoplasia 2021, 23, 692–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Gu, X.; Shi, Y.; Dong, M.; Jiang, L.; Yang, J.; Liu, Z. Exosomal transfer of tumor-associated macrophage-derived hsa_circ_0001610 reduces radiosensitivity in endometrial cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Torre, L.A.; Trabert, B.; DeSantis, C.E.; Miller, K.D.; Samimi, G.; Runowicz, C.D.; Gaudet, M.M.; Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.L. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Szajnik, M.; Czystowska-Kuźmicz, M.; Elishaev, E.; Whiteside, T.L. Biological markers of prognosis, response to therapy and outcome in ovarian carcinoma. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2016, 16, 811–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Reid, B.M.; Permuth, J.B.; Sellers, T.A. Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: A review. Cancer Biol. Med. 2017, 14, 9–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Poveda, A.; Floquet, A.; Ledermann, J.A.; Asher, R.; Penson, R.T.; Oza, A.M.; Korach, J.; Huzarski, T.; Pignata, S.; Friedlander, M.; et al. Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21): A final analysis of a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021, 22, 620–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Tewari, K.S.; Burger, R.A.; Enserro, D.; Norquist, B.M.; Swisher, E.M.; Brady, M.F.; Bookman, M.A.; Fleming, G.F.; Huang, H.; Homesley, H.D.; et al. Final Overall Survival of a Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Primary Treatment of Ovarian Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 2317–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hamanishi, J.; Mandai, M.; Ikeda, T.; Minami, M.; Kawaguchi, A.; Murayama, T.; Kanai, M.; Mori, Y.; Matsumoto, S.; Chikuma, S.; et al. Safety and Antitumor Activity of Anti-PD-1 Antibody, Nivolumab, in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 4015–4022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Dorayappan, K.D.P.; Wallbillich, J.J.; Cohn, D.E.; Selvendiran, K. The biological significance and clinical applications of exosomes in ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2016, 142, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Pradeep, S.; Kim, S.W.; Wu, S.Y.; Nishimura, M.; Chaluvally-Raghavan, P.; Miyake, T.; Pecot, C.V.; Kim, S.-J.; Choi, H.J.; Bischoff, F.Z.; et al. Hematogenous Metastasis of Ovarian Cancer: Rethinking Mode of Spread. Cancer Cell 2014, 26, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Harter, P.; Heitz, F.; Ataseven, B.; Schneider, S.; Baert, T.; Prader, S.; du Bois, A. How to manage lymph nodes in ovarian cancer. Cancer 2019, 125, 4573–4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Tan, D.S.; Agarwal, R.; Kaye, S.B. Mechanisms of transcoelomic metastasis in ovarian cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2006, 7, 925–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mikuła-Pietrasik, J.; Uruski, P.; Tykarski, A.; Książek, K. The peritoneal “soil” for a cancerous “seed”: A comprehensive review of the pathogenesis of intraperitoneal cancer metastases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 509–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Khan, S.; Jutzy, J.M.S.; Aspe, J.R.; McGregor, D.W.; Neidigh, J.W.; Wall, N.R. Survivin is released from cancer cells via exosomes. Apoptosis 2011, 16, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Liang, B.; Peng, P.; Chen, S.; Li, L.; Zhang, M.; Cao, D.; Yang, J.; Li, H.; Gui, T.; Li, X.; et al. Characterization and proteomic analysis of ovarian cancer-derived exosomes. J. Proteom. 2013, 80, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Tang, M.K.S.; Wong, A.S.T. Exosomes: Emerging biomarkers and targets for ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015, 367, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhang, W.; Peng, P.; Kuang, Y.; Yang, J.; Cao, D.; You, Y.; Shen, K. Characterization of exosomes derived from ovarian cancer cells and normal ovarian epithelial cells by nanoparticle tracking analysis. Tumour Biol. 2016, 37, 4213–4221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Holmes, D. Ovarian cancer: Beyond resistance. Nature 2015, 527, S217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Kuroki, L.; Guntupalli, S.R. Treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. BMJ 2020, 371, m3773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Calo, C.A.; Smith, B.Q.; Dorayappan, K.D.P.; Saini, U.; Lightfoot, M.; Wagner, V.; Kalaiyarasan, D.; Cosgrove, C.; Wang, Q.-E.; Maxwell, G.L.; et al. Aberrant expression of TMEM205 signaling promotes platinum resistance in ovarian cancer: An implication for the antitumor potential of DAP compound. Gynecol. Oncol. 2022, 164, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. EL Andaloussi, S.; Mäger, I.; Breakefield, X.O.; Wood, M.J.A. Extracellular vesicles: Biology and emerging therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013, 12, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Li, K.; Chen, Y.; Li, A.; Tan, C.; Liu, X. Exosomes play roles in sequential processes of tumor metastasis. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 144, 1486–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. De la Fuente, A.; Alonso-Alconada, L.; Costa, C.; Cueva, J.; Garcia-Caballero, T.; Lopez-Lopez, R.; Abal, M. M-Trap: Exosome-Based Capture of Tumor Cells as a New Technology in Peritoneal Metastasis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2015, 107, djv184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Castle, P.E.; Einstein, M.H.; Sahasrabuddhe, V.V. Cervical cancer prevention and control in women living with human immunodeficiency virus. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 505–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Cohen, P.A.; Jhingran, A.; Oaknin, A.; Denny, L. Cervical cancer. Lancet 2019, 393, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Lee, S.I.; Atri, M. 2018 FIGO Staging System for Uterine Cervical Cancer: Enter Cross-sectional Imaging. Radiology 2019, 292, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Screening for cervical cancer. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 347–348. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. WHO. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans Human papillomaviruses. IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risks Hum. 2007, 90, 1–636. [Google Scholar]
  127. Revathidevi, S.; Murugan, A.K.; Nakaoka, H.; Inoue, I.; Munirajan, A.K. APOBEC: A molecular driver in cervical cancer pathogenesis. Cancer Lett. 2021, 496, 104–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Small, W., Jr.; Bacon, M.A.; Bajaj, A.; Chuang, L.T.; Fisher, B.J.; Harkenrider, M.M.; Jhingran, A.; Kitchener, H.C.; Mileshkin, L.R.; Viswanathan, A.N.; et al. Cervical cancer: A global health crisis. Cancer 2017, 123, 2404–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Suran, M. Why US Cervical Cancer Survival Rates Haven’t Improved for Decades. JAMA 2022, 327, 1943–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bhat, A.; Yadav, J.; Thakur, K.; Aggarwal, N.; Tripathi, T.; Chhokar, A.; Singh, T.; Jadli, M.; Bharti, A.C. Exosomes from cervical cancer cells facilitate pro-angiogenic endothelial reconditioning through transfer of Hedgehog-GLI signaling components. Cancer Cell Int. 2021, 21, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lucido, C.T.; Wynja, E.; Madeo, M.; Williamson, C.S.; Schwartz, L.E.; Imblum, B.A.; Drapkin, R.; Vermeer, P.D. Innervation of cervical carcinoma is mediated by cancer-derived exosomes. Gynecol. Oncol. 2019, 154, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Honegger, A.; Schilling, D.; Bastian, S.; Sponagel, J.; Kuryshev, V.; Sültmann, H.; Scheffner, M.; Hoppe-Seyler, K.; Hoppe-Seyler, F. Dependence of intracellular and exosomal microRNAs on viral E6/E7 oncogene expression in HPV-positive tumor cells. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Cho, O.; Kim, D.-W.; Cheong, J.-Y. Plasma Exosomal miRNA Levels after Radiotherapy Are Associated with Early Progression and Metastasis of Cervical Cancer: A Pilot Study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Sang, L.; Wang, X.; Zhao, X. Mifepristone Inhibits the Migration of Cervical Cancer Cells by Inhibiting Exocrine Secretion. Pharmacology 2018, 101, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhang, G.; Liao, Y.; Pan, X.; Zhang, X. Exosomes from HPV-16 E7-pulsed dendritic cells prevent the migration, M1 polarization, and inflammation of macrophages in cervical cancer by regulating catalase 2 (CAT2). Ann. Transl. Med. 2022, 10, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Aqil, F.; Munagala, R.; Jeyabalan, J.; Agrawal, A.K.; Gupta, R. Exosomes for the Enhanced Tissue Bioavailability and Efficacy of Curcumin. AAPS J. 2017, 19, 1691–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Gu, B.; Shang, X.; Yan, M.; Li, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, C. Variations in incidence and mortality rates of endometrial cancer at the global, regional, and national levels, 1990–2019. Gynecol. Oncol. 2021, 161, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Sobel, M.; Simpson, A.N.; Ferguson, S.E. Endometrial cancer. CMAJ 2021, 193, E1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lewin, S.N.; Herzog, T.J.; Barrena Medel, N.I.; Deutsch, I.; Burke, W.M.; Sun, X.; Wright, J.D. Comparative performance of the 2009 international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics’ staging system for uterine corpus cancer. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 116, 1141–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Braun, M.M.; Overbeek-Wager, E.A.; Grumbo, R.J. Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer. Am. Fam. Physician 2016, 93, 468–474. [Google Scholar]
  141. Esfandyari, S.; Elkafas, H.; Chugh, R.M.; Park, H.-S.; Navarro, A.; Al-Hendy, A. Exosomes as Biomarkers for Female Reproductive Diseases Diagnosis and Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Urick, M.E.; Bell, D.W. Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets in Endometrial Cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2019, 19, 510–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Mojtahedin, S.; Nasimi, F.S.; Tajalli, H.; Ebrahimi, S.; Alimohammadzadeh, B.; Rahbarghazi, R.; Mahdipour, M. Light-emitting diode photomodulation of uterine adenocarcinoma cells inhibited angiogenesis capacity via the regulation of exosome biogenesis. Lasers Med. Sci. 2022, 37, 3193–3201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Park, Y.; Lee, K.; Kim, S.W.; Lee, M.W.; Kim, B.; Lee, S.G. Effects of Induced Exosomes from Endometrial Cancer Cells on Tumor Activity in the Presence of Aurea helianthus Extract. Molecules 2021, 26, 2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Role of EV biomarkers in the gynecologic cancer microenvironment.
Table 1. Role of EV biomarkers in the gynecologic cancer microenvironment.
Marker TypeCancer TypeEV MarkerEV SourceFunctionPotential Clinical ApplicationRef.
ProteinOCATF2CellsEnhance angiogenesisTherapeutic target[16]
MTA1
ROCK1/2
sE-cadSerum, ascitesEnhance angiogenesis[17]
claudin-4CellsBiomarkerEarly detection[18]
HGFSerumBiomarker[19]
STAT3Biomarker
IL-6Biomarker
TGFβCellsBiomarker[20]
FGF9CellsBiomarkerPrognosis prediction[21]
FATSPlasmaBiomarker[22]
ClathrinMilkEnhance the anti-cancer effectiveness of cisplatinNanocarrier[23]
LAMP2BCellsEnhance the sensitivity of chemotherapy[24]
Protein receptorPKR1SerumEnhance angiogenesisTherapeutic target[25]
miRNAmiR-130aCellsEnhance angiogenesis[26]
miR-205CellsEnhance angiogenesis[27]
miR-141-3pCellsEnhance angiogenesis[28]
miR-940AscitesStimulate TAM polarization[29]
miR-221-3pSerumPromote cancer cells invasion and migration[30]
miR-6780b-5pAscitesPromote cancer cells invasion and migration[31]
miR-21-5pCells, PlasmaPromote cancer cells invasion and migration[32]
miR-21SerumBiomarkerEarly detection[33]
miR-141SerumBiomarker
miR-200aSerumBiomarker
miR-200bSerumBiomarker
miR-200cSerumBiomarker
miR-203SerumBiomarker
miR-205SerumBiomarker
miR-214SerumBiomarker
miR-21PlasmaBiomarker[34]
miR-100PlasmaBiomarker
miR-200bPlasmaBiomarker
miRNAOCmiR-320PlasmaBiomarkerEarly detection[34]
miR-16PlasmaBiomarker
miR-93PlasmaBiomarker
miR-126PlasmaBiomarker
miR-223PlasmaBiomarker
miR-1290SerumBiomarker[35]
miR-1260aPlasmaBiomarker[36]
miR-7977PlasmaBiomarker
miR-192-5pPlasmaBiomarker
miR-21-5pCellsBiomarker[37]
miR-29a-3pCellsBiomarker
miR-200aAscitesBiomarkerPrognosis prediction[38]
miR-200bAscitesBiomarker
miR-200cAscitesBiomarker
miR-1290AscitesBiomarker
miR-484SerumBiomarker[39]
miR21CellsIncrease chemoresistanceTherapeutic target[40]
miR-7CellsInhibit cancer cells invasion and migration[41]
miR-155-5pCellsInhibit cancer cells invasion and migration[42]
miR-29a-3pCellsPromote cancer cells invasion and migration[43]
miR497CellsReduce cisplatin resistanceNanocarrier[44]
circRNAcircRNA051239PlasmaPromote cancer cells invasion and migrationTherapeutic target[45]
circFoxp1SerumBiomarker and increase cisplatin resistancePrognosis prediction and therapeutic target[46]
Cdr1asSerumBiomarkerPrognosis prediction[47]
LncRNAMALAT1SerumEnhance angiogenesis and biomarkerTherapeutic target and prognosis prediction[48]
lncRNA ATBCellsEnhance angiogenesisTherapeutic target[49]
LipidPSAscitesInhibit T cell activation[50]
EnzymeARG-1Plasma, ascitesInhibit T cell proliferation[51]
ProteinCCTIE2CellsEnhance angiogenesis[52]
Wnt2BCellsEnhance stroma remodeling and cancer progression[53]
KPNβ1SerumBiomarkerEarly detection[54]
CRM1
CAS
IPO5
TNPO1
HPV E6CellsBiomarkerEarly detection[55]
HMGB1CellsInhibit cell proliferation and promote cell apoptosisTherapeutic target[56]
miRNAmiR-223CellsActivates STAT3 signals[57]
miR-221-3pCellsEnhance angiogenesis[58,59]
CellsEnhance lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis[60]
miR-663bCellsEnhance angiogenesis[61]
CellsEnhance the metastatic ability of cancer cells[62]
miR-155-5pCellsPromote cancer cells invasion and migration[63]
miR-142-5pCellsSuppress and exhaust CD8 T cells[64]
Let-7d-3pPlasmaBiomarkerEarly detection[65]
miR-30d-5p
miR-21Cervicovaginal lavage sampleBiomarker[66]
miR-146a
miR-146a-5pPlasmaBiomarker[67]
miR-151a-3p
miR-2110
miR-21-5p
miR-125a-5pPlasmaBiomarker[68]
miR-1468-5pCellsBiomarkerPrognosis prediction[69]
miRNACCmiR-423-3pPlasmaInhibit the macrophage M2 polarizationTherapeutic target[70]
miR-106aCellsReduce cisplatin resistance[71]
miR-106b
miR-1323CellsEnhance cancer progression and radioresistance[72]
miR-22CellsEnhance the sensitivity of radiotherapy[73]
miR-320aCellsReduce cisplatin resistanceNanocarrier[74]
miR-142-3pPlasmaBiomarkerEarly detection[75]
mRNACXCL5
KIF2A
RGS18
APL6IP5
DAPP1
snoRNASNORD17
SCARNA12
SNORA6
SNORA12
SCRNA1
SNORD97
SNORD62
SNORD38A
lncRNALINC01305CellsEnhance cancer progressionTherapeutic target[76]
AGAP2-AS1CellsPromote cancer cells invasion and migration[77]
HOTAIRCervicovaginal lavage sampleBiomarkerEarly detection[78]
MALAT1
MEG3
DLX6-AS1SerumBiomarkerPrognosis prediction[79]
ProteinECLGALS3BPPlasmaPromote cancer cells invasion and migration, enhance angiogenesisTherapeutic target[80]
ANXA2PlasmaBiomarkerEarly detection[81]
SERPINA5PlasmaBiomarkerPrognosis prediction[82]
miRNAmiR-148bCellsInhibit cancer cells invasion and migrationTherapeutic target[83]
miR-141-3pCellsIntercellular communication between cancer cells and neighboring fibroblasts[84]
miR-200b-3pCells
miR-133aCellsEnhance cancer progression[85]
miR-27a-5pSerumPromote cancer cells invasion and migration[86]
miRNA-21CellsEnhance the macrophage M2 polarization[87]
miR-15a-5pPlasmaBiomarkerEarly detection[88]
miR-200cUrineBiomarker[89]
miR-26a-5pPlasmaBiomarker[90]
miR-142-3pPlasmaBiomarker[91]
miR-146a-5p
miR-151a-5p
miRNA-93SerumBiomarkerPrognosis prediction[92]
miRNA-205
miR-192-5pCellsInhibit cancer cells EMT and metastasisTherapeutic target[93]
miR-320aCellsInhibit cancer cells invasion and migration[94]
miR-503-3pCellsInhibit cancer cells invasion and migration[95]
miR-302aCellsInhibit cancer cells invasion and migration[96]
miR-499a-5pCellsInhibit cancer cells invasion and migration, inhibit angiogenesis[97]
lncRNADLEU1CellsPromote cancer cells invasion and migration[98]
NEAT1[99]
circRNAhsa_circ_0001610CellsReduce the sensitivity of radiotherapy[100]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, R.; Zou, Y.; Luo, J. Application of Extracellular Vesicles in Gynecologic Cancer Treatment. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120740

AMA Style

Zhang R, Zou Y, Luo J. Application of Extracellular Vesicles in Gynecologic Cancer Treatment. Bioengineering. 2022; 9(12):740. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120740

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Renwen, Yixing Zou, and Jing Luo. 2022. "Application of Extracellular Vesicles in Gynecologic Cancer Treatment" Bioengineering 9, no. 12: 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120740

APA Style

Zhang, R., Zou, Y., & Luo, J. (2022). Application of Extracellular Vesicles in Gynecologic Cancer Treatment. Bioengineering, 9(12), 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120740

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop