3.1. Trace Element Analyses of Straw Fermentation Medium with ‘Synthetic Manure’
Gradual purging of the trace elements in the inoculum sludge, technical modifications, and process stabilization occurred in the start-up phase of about 140 days and an HRT of 18 d (see
Section 2.5), which was continued after the commencement of the study to 340 days in
Figure 2 and 370 days in
Figure 3. Simultaneously, the monitoring for the fermentation campaign of the three mesophilic (41 °C) and three thermophilic (58 °C) fermenters was executed, which lasted for 640 days. The objective was to determine the trace element requirement for straw digestion, as well as maximum methane yields under defined conditions. The analysis of the straw, as shown in
Table 1, indicated that there was sufficient cobalt concentration in the wheat straw substrate. This is also demonstrated by the continuously monitored dissolved cobalt concentration in the fermenters (
Figure 2 and
Figure 3 and
Table 3). However, tungsten supplementation was required, as it was estimated to be below detection limit in the dry mass,
Table 1. The appreciable nickel concentration of 0.58 mg/kg in dry matter (
Table 1) is a good example to show that the elemental content of dried substrate (with or without fermentation medium) could be deceptive. It was later found that the amount of dissolved nickel was not sufficient for the entire fermentation period, see
Figure 2 and
Figure 3. Therefore, supplementation with these elements was considered in the fermentation experiment. Furthermore, the safe limit of OLR or HRT for straw digestion under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions was evaluated, according to the fermentation program in
Figure 1B. The following terms for OLRs were used: 4.5 as ‘low’, 7.5 as ‘medium’, and 9.0 gVS/L/d as ‘high’. The resulting HRT was diminished congruently by the OLR to 18, 10, or 8 days, respectively, because it was coupled with the liquid 10% straw suspension as substrate.
The molecular formula of the wheat straw used was found to be C
3.71H
6.04O
2.79N
0.044S
0.005 (
Table 1). Based on this formula, the theoretical maximum BMPth was calculated to be 293.4 mL
STP/gVS straw, with a theoretical methane content of 51.8% in the biogas (measured 51.5%). To obtain the index values of the molecular formula, the percentage-content of the elements (
Table 1) were divided by the corresponding atomic number of C, H, O, N, S, and P.
The alkalinity of the six parallel fermenters were in the range of 7000 and 9600 mg CaCO
3-eq./L during the fermentation, as it was influenced by the OLR. Therefore, the buffer capacity of the fermentation medium was marginally lower than that of the ‘synthetic manure’ (
Section 2.2 and
Table 2), but the buffer capacity was almost always twice the value (4000 mg CaCO
3-eq./L) required to guarantee a pH of around 7.0 [
38]. The resulting pH value was between 7.3–7.4 (mesophilic) and 7.4–7.6 (thermophilic). There was an excess phosphate from the straw substrate, because the phosphate concentration increased from about 140 mg/L up to 260 mg/L during the entire fermentation period.
The ammonium concentration of the fermentation media was controlled mainly by the defined ‘synthetic manure’ (
Table 2), it was about 1940 mg/L or 108 mmol L
−1 [
22]. The highest ammonia value obtained was 800 mg/L for the thermophilic fermenter F5. Its concentration was mainly influenced by the different temperatures of the fermenters, according to [
28], as the pH was stable (
Figure 2,
Figure 3 and
Figure 4). However, even at this level of 800 mg/L, there should be no inhibition, as the cultures adapted and acclimatized well. This assumption was based on the recent review by [
39] because thermophilic systems with temperatures around 55 °C can carry out efficient anaerobic digestion, without any sign of inhibition, at ammonia concentrations up to 1000–1500 mg/L.
Table 3 shows the concentration of the dissolved ions of Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, Ni, and W during the 640 days of fermentation. The potassium cation was chosen as a reference ion, as it does not form precipitates with the common anions. Calcium was taken as the second reference ion because it can precipitate as carbonate. Both reference ions are light elements with atomic number of 19 and 20, respectively, and can determined with TXRF with uncertainty. Interestingly, in the case of calcium, less than half of the concentration, being present in the mesophilic fermenters, was estimated in the thermophilic fermenters. No significant difference was seen for cobalt, copper, and zinc ions, with regard to the different fermentation temperatures. Low dissolved ions concentration of around 0.05 mg/L was found during the fermentation process. However, dissolved nickel and tungsten concentrations were below the detection limit (less than 0.002 mg/L [
9]) under both temperature conditions. There was only a small difference between the iron concentration of all the six fermenters, as the average concentration was about 9.1 for mesophilic and 7.8 mg/L for thermophilic fermenters, respectively (
Table 3).
Nonetheless, it was obvious that the concentration of manganese ions in the thermophilic fermenters was significantly higher than in the mesophilic fermenters. The selective character made sedimentation an unlikely cause. Therefore, the observed six times less manganese concentration in the thermophilic fermenters could mean that there was a higher consumption of manganese by the thermophilic microbial population or even thermophilic methanogens (
Table 3). So far, data (with respect to this phenomenon) have not been found in literature. Furthermore, data from literature generally refer to the whole fermenter content, including substrate and digestate, as well, and do not differentiate between dissolved or undissolved precipitations. The six-fold, relatively low concentration of manganese in the thermophilic fermenters for the methanogenic population remains a phenomenon, which could possibly be investigated in a separate study.
3.3. Methane Yields of Anaerobic Straw Digestion
A trend of the specific methane gas production (mL
STP CH
4/gVS) in fermenter F1 (mesophilic) and F2 (thermophilic) is presented in
Figure 4A, to show the efficiency of substrate conversion into methane. Alternatively, in
Figure 4B, the volumetric biogas production (sum of CH
4 + CO
2, with CH
4 being 51.5%) of fermenter F3 (mesophilic) and F6 (thermophilic) is pictured to demonstrate more the dynamics of gas production during mesophilic and thermophilic straw fermentation (L biogas/L fermenter volume FV).
Fermenters F1 and F2 were successively supplemented with nickel in four periods and then, finally, supplemented with tungsten, as shown in
Figure 2. In the first fermentation period until 330 d (
Figure 2), a mixed situation with an incomplete washout of trace elements occurred, the highest specific GPR was observed for the thermophilic fermenter F2 and F6 at around 300 days, with a low OLR of 4.5 gVS/L/d and HRT 18 days (
Figure 4A). Both fermenters generated 254 mL
STP CH
4/gVS/L/d. Remarkably, at the low OLR of 4.5 g/L/d, the thermophilic fermenters F2 and F6 both showed higher methane yields than the mesophilic fermenter F1 and F3, with 224 and 227 mL
STP CH
4/gVS, respectively (see the first column in
Table 6 and
Table 7). The highest methane yields of the mesophilic fermenter F1 and F3 were observed at a medium OLR of 7.5 gVS/L/d and after supplementation with nickel, then later with tungsten. F1 and F3 achieved a specific GPR of 230 and 242 mL
STP CH
4/gVS, respectively. However, the yields of the thermophilic fermenters F2 and F6 continuously declined, both from 254 to 179 and 182 mL
STP CH
4/gVS, respectively. This occurred in the subsequent fermentation period with an OLR 7.5 gVS/L/d (
Table 6 and
Table 7). It seemed that the hydrolysis of straw was complete at a low OLR, but this was more pronounced under thermophilic conditions. However, without the supplementation of nickel and tungsten, the specific GPR in the mesophilic, fermenter F4 decreased, finally, to 148 mL
STP CH
4/gVS, and that of the thermophilic reference fermenter F5 decreased to 139 mL
STP CH
4/gVS (
Table 6 and
Table 7). Additionally, the VFA production and resulting level of VFA were negatively affected by the absence of nickel and tungsten in the reference fermenters. They showed the highest VFA levels, with 5000–9000 (fermenter F4) and 3000–6000 (fermenter F5) at the end of the fermentation campaign after 640 days (
Figure 4A, B,
Table 6 and
Table 7, column 4). The initial strategy was to induce trace elements requirement, by increasing the OLR from 7.5 (HRT of 10 days) to 9.0 gVS/L/d (HRT of 8 days). However, this led to indications of instability (
Figure 4A, period 4 from 440–570 d), as the VFA increased from 300 to 4000 in the mesophilic fermenter F1 and from 2000 to 6000 mg/L in the thermophilic fermenter F2. The VFA concentration in the mesophilic reference fermenter F4, without supplementation, was between 5000–9000 mg/L, whereas the VFA concentration in the thermophilic reference fermenter F5 ranged between 3000–6000 mg/L after 640 d (
Table 6 and
Table 7).
However, the pH was stable between 7.3–7.6 and cell counts still increased between 440–570 days (
Table 5, sampling time 423 and 521 d). It showed that the sensitive VFA level alone should not be indicator of process imbalance. The buffer capacity should also be considered. However, the buffer capacity is a very slow indicator [
10]. Furthermore, after adding tungsten in the last fermentation period 5, the specific GPR increased in the mesophilic fermenter F1 from about 0.155 to 0.230 L/gVS, whereas it slightly increased in the thermophilic fermenter F2 from 0.146 up to 0.179 L/gVS (
Figure 4A). Thereby, as expected, the VFA concentration decreased from 4000 to 1000 mg/l in the mesophilic fermenter F1 and decreased from 6000 to 2000 mg/L in the thermophilic fermenter F2 (
Table 6 and
Table 7, column 4).
However, successive addition of nickel alone during fermentation periods 1–4 in mesophilic fermenter F1 and thermophilic fermenter F2 (
Figure 2) did not cause any increase in methane production, if compared with
Figure 4A. This is somewhat in contrast to the slow increase of methanogenic cells of
Figure 2 and
Table 5. However, an obvious increase in specific GPR occurred after tungsten was added in period 5 (
Figure 4A,
Table 7). The GPR increase was directly related to a huge increase of the number of methanogenic cells by 200–300% (
Figure 2 and
Figure 3 and
Table 5), but only to a low or moderate rise of total cell counts. It seems that the limited number of methanogenic cells in the range of 10
8 mL
−1 was a ‘bottleneck’ for the maximum possible methane production, as well as for VFA-consumption (mainly acetic acid, >80%).
Besides the methanogens, hydrolytic and syntrophic acetate oxidizing bacteria could be limiting in the anaerobic food chain [
41,
42]. The much lower increase of total bacterial cell counts (
Table 4 and
Table 5) could be an indication, that the presence of syntrophic bacteria was already adequate. This somewhat contradicts the old dogma of the rate-limiting step of polymeric carbohydrate degradation by hydrolytic bacteria (and not methanogens), as shown with cellulose and dissolved starch, glucose, and acetic acid [
43]. Notably, in the case of straw, the cellulose biodegradation is much more recalcitrant for hydrolytic bacteria, as it is additionally complexed by lignin [
44].
A somewhat different situation, with respect to VFA levels and methane production, was seen after fermentation, day 315, during the combined supplementation of nickel and tungsten in F3 (mesophilic) and F6 (thermophilic), with the constant OLR of 7.5 gVS/L/day after 315 d (
Figure 3 and
Figure 4B). There was a permanent increase in the volumetric biogas production (L/L fermenter volume FV) from F3 by 23% to about 3.7 L/L/d and 16% in F6 to about 2.8 L/L/d (
Figure 4B,
Table 6 and
Table 7). As outlined under
Figure 3, 0.05 mg W/L was first added in period 1 (370–405 day); after that, a combination of 0.05 mg/L [Ni + W] and EDTA was added to both F3 and F6 in period 2 (405–540 day). Then, finally, an increased concentration of 0.15 mg/L [Ni + W] + EDTA was added to both fermenters F3 and F6 in period 3 (540–640 day). As shown in
Figure 3, the supplementation caused a sudden increase in the dissolved concentration of nickel and tungsten to reach 0.125 mg/L in fermentation period 3 (
Figure 3). That was accompanied by an obvious increase in the specific GPR, as well by the number of methanogenic cells, which increased only in this period after tungsten was added. It seems that a concentration of dissolved tungsten (0.05 mg/L) was insufficient and, thus, indicated a threshold concentration of about 0.1 mg/L dissolved tungsten was necessary to reach the optimum for space-time methane yields and low VFA levels (
Figure 4B). As already shown, the increase of the specific GPR/gVS was accompanied by a permanent simultaneous decline of the VFA-level in the mesophilic fermenter F3, even from 2000 mg/L to 200 mg/L. A similar VFA decrease was seen during successive supplementation of nickel and later tungsten in the mesophilic fermenter F1 (
Figure 2 and
Figure 4A,
Table 6 and
Table 7). The VFA level in the more sensitive thermophilic fermenter F2 and F6 declined only from 6000 or 4000 to ± 2000 mg/L (
Table 7). The composition of VFA in all fermenters was similar and consisted mainly of acetic acid (>80%), propionic acid (<15%), and a lesser amount of butyric acid (2.5%).
Table 6 and
Table 7 show a summary of average values for maximum specific GPR/gVS, together with the average VFA levels of all six continuously stirred straw fermenters with buffered ‘synthetic manure’.
3.6. Microbial Community Composition
The distinct effect of tungsten is known from studies with a pure culture of
Methanocorpusculum grown mesophilic on H
2-CO
2 [
19] and later from biochemical properties, as reviewed by [
15,
18].
Methanocorpusculum belongs to the order
Methanomicrobiales like
Methanoculleus, Figure 5. However, apparently, hydrogenotrophic species of the thermophilic genus
Methanobacterium also require tungsten [
17]. Furthermore, tungsten dependence of fermentative bacteria is also indicated, mainly by biochemical data [
18,
20].
Figure 5 shows the NGS-data for methanogens.
Methanothermobacter was found to be exclusively dominant in the thermophilic fermenter F2 on day 269 d. The thermophilic genus
Methanothermobacter belongs to the class of
Methanobacteria and exhibited a relative abundance of 6–22%. However, the microscopic quantification (
Table 4 and
Table 5) showed that methanogens represented only 4–9% of the relative abundance. Such a divergence is not unusual, as the NGS-data are only qualitatively exact and manipulated by activities such as DNA extraction, choice of the right primer, PCR amplification, and, last but not least, the used software program of the database used [
54]. A low proportion of methanogens, in the range of 5–10%, is also not unusual for complex substrates with a high percentage of hydrolytic bacteria. It reflects a high activity and functionality of the anaerobic community, as presented in other studies, too [
31,
32,
55,
56].
Methanothermobacter is a methanogen that uses only H
2 and CO
2. It is mostly found to be dominant in agricultural-based, thermophilic biogas plants [
57,
58]. This occurrence corresponds to the general assumption that a high substrate load and/or thermophilic conditions leads to an increase in partial hydrogen pressure and extends the energetically more favourable thermophilic H
2-CO
2 consumers [
32,
58]. The successive addition of nickel, after 340 d and tungsten on 570 d, did not change the sole dominance of
Methanothermobacter (
Figure 5), but it increased the cell number of methanogens tremendously (
Figure 2,
Table 5).
In contrast to thermophilic conditions, the NGS analysis of mesophilic archaea revealed a 3–7% abundance of the class
Methanomicrobia, including the order
Methanomicrobiales, with the genus
Methanoculleus, furthermore, the order
Methanosarcinales, with the genus
Methanosaeta, as the most dominant representatives (>1%, pie charts of
Figure 5). Currently, the genus of
Methanoculleus comprises a group of at least 12 species, with a typical diameter of >2 µm and exclusively H
2/CO
2 consumers. In addition, some methanogens use formate as substrate [
59], not found here. The genus
Methanosaeta is a typical acetotrophic methanogen and metabolizes acetate as sole source of energy. It comprises of four species [
59].
As shown in the top row of
Figure 5, for the mesophilic fermenter F1, the relation of the genera
Methanosaeta and
Methanoculleus was with 55: 45% at the beginning of the fermentation campaign on day 269 d and changed slightly to 60: 40% on fermentation day 316 d. However, the mesophilic fermenter F1 was first supplemented with a small amount of nickel (0.05 mg/L) in fermentation period 3 (405–440 day), whereas the thermophilic fermenter F2 had started to supplement the same amount of nickel already in the previous fermentation periods 1 and 2 (340–405 day),
Figure 2. In fermentation period 4 (440–570 day), the added amount of nickel was tripled, together with EDTA, to improve the availability of the bivalent nickel ions. At the end of the monitored fermentation campaign, that is after the successive addition of nickel in four periods (340–570 day) and final addition of tungsten in period 5 (after 570 day), the methanogenesis in the mesophilic fermenter F1 was clearly shifted in favour of the H
2-CO
2 consuming
Methanoculleus with 85: 15% over
Methanosaeta. However, after nickel supplementation, between 405 d and day 518 d (
Figure 2), a slight dominance of
Methanoculleus over
Methanosaeta could be recognized, increasing from 45% to about 55% (
Figure 5). This was accompanied by a slight increase of methanogens and total cell counts (
Table 4 and
Table 5). However, the sensitive VFA-level arose in this fermentation period 4, remarkably from 100–300 to 1000 to 4000 mg/L, as caused by the increased OLR of 9.0 gVS/L/d, with the reduced HRT of 8 days (fermenter F1,
Table 7). The threefold VFA level might also result in a raise of the partial H
2 pressure, in favour of hydrogenotrophic methanogens, such as
Methanoculleus. However, the final decrease of VFA in period 5 down to 1000 mg/L occurred only after tungsten addition (
Table 7). Additionally, after final tungsten supplementation, the number of methanogenic cells jumped abruptly by a factor of 330% (
Figure 2 and
Table 5). Coincidently, the proportion of
Methanoculleus increased by tungsten from 55% to 90% on fermentation day 598 d (period 5), and at the same time, the portion of
Methanosaeta decreased to about 10% (
Figure 5). Therefore, it can be concluded that, during the sudden rise in the number of methanogenic cells, the hydrogenotrophic genus
Methanoculleus replaced the acetotrophic genus
Methanosaeta. Consequentially, the methanogenesis must have switched from acetotrophic (
Methanosaeta) to hydrogenotrophic growth (
Methanoculleus),
Figure 5. It is noteworthy that only H
2-CO
2 consuming methanogens need the CO
2 activating formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase, which could be a constitutive tungsten enzyme [
15,
18]. However, apparently, a threshold of about 0.1 mg/L dissolved tungsten was required, as revealed independently by the two different OLR regimes with successive (
Figure 2) and combined supplementation (
Figure 3). Parallel, the specific GPR in the fermenter F1, F2, F3, and F6 increased after tungsten supplementation and induced a simultaneous reduction of the VFA level (
Table 6 and
Table 7). Meanwhile, the specific GPR of the un-supplemented reference fermenter F4 and F5 continuously dropped down and remained at a modest level, but with a high VFA level of 6000–9000 mg/L (
Table 6 and
Table 7).
Overall, it seems worthwhile to emphasize that the study demonstrated trace element dependency, only after a very long time of fermentation. The monitoring of dissolved trace elements during the fermentation campaign revealed that 290 days are needed for complete washout of the nickel-peak of inoculum (
Figure 2 and
Figure 3,
Table 3; 140 d pre-fermentation period and 150 d fermentation with an HRT of 18 d, see
Section 2.5). Therefore, contrary results with no increase in the number of methanogens by trace element addition during fermentation of grass silage for only 70 days could be due to insufficient washout of trace elements [
60,
61]. In their study [
60,
61], the supplemented trace elements (Co, Fe, and Ni) were added in concentrations of around 10 mg/L, being at least 100 times higher than the optimum concentrations found in this study with wheat straw and ‘synthetic manure’.
Similar experiments, studying the contribution of methanogens during biogas production in laboratory fermenters, were also conducted by [
62]. The authors investigated the varying relationship between
Methanosarcina and
Methanoculleus during methanogenic fermentation of the protein-rich leftover of an alcoholic yeast fermentation, referred to as ‘distillers grain’ [
62]. They monitored the process for a period of 532 days (76 weeks), in order to investigate the influence of a suggested cocktail of trace elements (a mix of Co, Mo, Mn, and W). The initial deprivation of the system of trace elements resulted in a decline of Co and Mo, from 2.9 and 0.8 mg/L to 0.9 and 0.2 mg/L, respectively. Mn decreased from 38 to 1.8 mg/L and W decreased from 1.4 to 0.2 mg/L [
61]. This was a high washout, but presumably not enough to provoke a deficiency, if compared with the optimum concentrations found in the present work and for pure cultures of methanogens, in the range of 0.1 mg/L, as summarized by [
6]. Accordingly, after their washout period, the authors of [
60] measured only a slight drop down of 5% by
Methanosarcina, from 72% to 67% and a concomitant increase of
Methanoculleus. Therefore, the results in [
61], with a much higher concentrated mix of at least 4 elements (including tungsten), cannot be compared with the results of this study.
Additional NGS-microbiome data, with respect to the involved major players of bacterial classes and genera, have been presented in
Figure 6 and
Figure 7A–C. Their occurrence will be compared with the related literature data regarding the anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic substrates. The percentage of classes with a relative occurrence of less than 1% is extremely low, both in the mesophilic microbial communities and, especially, in the thermophilic composition. Thus, the sum of the classes that occur more than 1% is over 90%. The mesophilic fermenters F1, F3, and F4 exhibited a spectrum of 7 relevant bacterial classes with >1% abundance, containing 17 major bacterial genera in the genus list >3% abundance. The thermophilic fermenters F2, F5, and F6 were mainly restricted to only two dominant classes >1%, but with 11 major bacterial genera in the genus list >3% abundance. Such a dominance of only two bacterial, thermophilic classes (
Clostridia and
Mollicutes) in the thermophilic fermenter F2, F5, and F6 is quite unique and not previously found in literature related to methanogenic fermentation of biomass. The genera
Syntrophaceticus,
Defluviitalea,
Ruminiclostridium, and
Haloplasma were observed entirely in thermophilic fermenter F2, F5, and F6, whereas the bacterial genus
Herbinix and uncultured genus ‘UCG_001_ge’ appeared only in the mesophilic fermenter F1, F3, and F4. It is noteworthy that a total of 285 mesophilic and 167 thermophilic genera <1% were identified through NGS-analysis. Thus, a high bacterial diversity still existed as a gene reservoir in the background, but a strong selection must have occurred in this long-term, CSTR fermentation with straw under defined fermenter conditions and ‘synthetic manure’ (
Table 2).
The bacterial class
Clostridia of the phylum
Firmicutes (bright blue) was dominant in the mesophilic, as well as in the thermophilic fermenters.
Clostridia represented a contingent of 30–55% of the >1% abundant classes at the beginning of the supplementation period (45 d) and continued over the whole fermentation period, until the last sample of fermentation day 598 d (
Figure 6). However, this outstanding dominant contribution by the clostridial
Firmicutes during mesophilic straw fermentation was even surpassed in the thermophilic fermenters, with about 75–85% abundance.
Firmicutes also dominated in other thermophilic biogas fermenter system with wheat straw as the sole substrate, as investigated by [
63,
64]. In contrast, the class
Bacteroidia (phylum Bacteroidetes, orange) occurred only under mesophilic conditions in fermenter F1, F3, and F4. They gained importance and reached up to 45% abundance in the classes with >1% abundance.
Firmicutes and
Bacteroidetes are known to be involved in the hydrolytic degradation of cellulosic compounds. Hence, they were found to be dominant in agricultural-based biogas plants or biogas fermenters fed with cellulosic compounds [
55,
56,
58,
65,
66,
67,
68,
69]. Both phyla,
Firmicutes and
Bacteroidetes, can be exchanged with each other, as shown by [
57], in a long-term fermentation period of 1750 days, with fodder beet silage as a mono-substrate. Interestingly, in this work they were not major players right from the beginning, as they first appeared in the sample on fermentation day 269 d (
Figure 6). Notably, also the dominant occurrence of the class
Cloacimonadia (bright green) was restricted to the mesophilic fermenters, just as the
Bacteroidia (
Figure 6). They presented major players of straw digestion, with up to 30%, as shown in
Figure 6. The outstanding genus candidatus ‘W5 group of
Cloacimonas’ in the mesophilic fermenters will be discussed later, with respect to further relevant genera. The class
Synergistia (grey) decreased during the entire fermentation period, from nearly 20% to 2–3%.
Synergistia are sugar fermenting bacteria and consist largely of different
Anaerobaculum species, synonymous with
Acetomicrobium [
70]. In a recent paper of a combined enzymatic and anaerobic digestion process, with the lignocellulosic substrate “cedarwood”, the
Synergistia belonged to the four most relevant classes, making up 6–44% relative frequency, besides
Methanobacteria,
Clostridia, and
Thermotogae.
The bacterial phyla of the thermophilic fermenter F2, F6, and reference F5 seemed to be more restricted or specialized than the phyla of the mesophilic fermenter F1, F3, and F4. Only two dominant bacterial groups, the class
Clostridia (bright blue, phylum
Firmicutes) and osmotolerant
Mollicutes (violet, phylum
Tenericutes) were found, under thermophilic conditions, to account for 1–9% of the classes, with an abundance > 1%, besides the archaeal methanogens. However,
Mollicutes were also recognized in the mesophilic fermenter F1, F3, and F4 (
Figure 6). Furthermore,
Mollicutes have been observed in some agricultural-based biogas plants [
58] and a thermophilic biowaste digester [
56]. The clostridial
Defluviitalea belongs to the
Mollicutes and was found to be present here, with 4–14% as the sole thermophilic genus of this group with an abundance >3% (bright green,
Figure 7A). This fermentative genus, with two different species, is able to grow on carbohydrates and was already observed in a rice straw fermenter [
71].
As already mentioned, no major role of the class
Bacteroidia >1% was noticed under the thermophilic conditions. On the other side,
Thermotogae (>1% abundance) are well known from thermophilic biogas plants [
31,
56]. However, here, they were found to occur only in the thermophilic, unsupplemented reference fermenter F5 on fermentation day 598 d (
Figure 6). The classes
Clostridia,
Mollicutes, and
Bacteroidia played a relevant role (>1% abundance) for both mesophilic and thermophilic straw fermentation. The Mollicutes accommodate the order
Haloplasmatales, with
Haloplasma as the sole genus. The exclusive appearance of the genus
Haloplasma was seen in the list of relevant players >3%, with an abundance up to 9% (
Figure 7C). However, this genus was only related to the thermophilic fermenter F2, F5, and F6 (
Figure 7C). However, the occurrence of
Haloplasmatales in anaerobic biomass digesters has been rarely observed. The authors [
72] found them in 1.5-L laboratory biogas fermenters (55 °C, 200 days), using lignocellulosic switch grass as the mono-substrate. The genus
Haloplasma has no cell wall and was also seen as a major player in thermophilic 100 mL biogas batch assays at 55 °C, but with different kinds of paper-cellulose as the substrate [
73]. Interestingly, the clostridial
Halocella is an osmotolerant bacterium similar to
Haloplasma, too, but with a cell wall.
Halocella was observed to be a major player in full-scale, thermophilic biogas plants, as well [
31,
56,
65,
72]. Seemingly,
Haloplasma could replace
Halocella in thermophilic anaerobic digesters with cellulosic material. This finding is quite unique and not previously found in literature. It may be an indication that the ‘synthetic manure’, with a similar osmolarity to natural cow manure (
Table 2), forced osmotolerant genera in the same manner.
Another outstanding detection of a representative of the
Cloacimonadia was the W5 group of
Cloacimonas, with up to 29% occurrence in the list with >3% abundance of mesophilic genera (
Figure 7C). The order
Cloacimonadales was just recently found as a major player in different mesophilic agricultural-based biogas plants, by [
69]. However, another genus of this group was found to be relevant in a thermophilic agricultural-based biogas plant [
55]. The authors [
55] designated it as genus ‘
Cloacimonetes WWE1’. Possibly,
Cloacimonadia plays an important role as propionate oxidizers. Some members of Cloacimonetes are known to be propionate oxidizers [
73], which live in obligate syntrophy with hydrogenotrophic methanogens [
41]. Their presence could explain that the increase of VFA during the slight imbalanced states of the fermentation campaign was restricted, mainly due to acetic acid. Only a minor part <15% propionic acid contributed to the VFA level (
Table 6 and
Table 7).
Another remarkable finding was the discovery of the mesophilic, cellulolytic genus
Ruminiclostridium_1, with 28–44% occurrence (yellow) in the thermophilic fermenters. However, this genus occurred to a smaller extent (5%), as well as in all mesophilic fermenters (
Figure 7A). The authors [
26], with their 100 mL batch straw assays, as well as the authors [
69], with their study of 20 full-scale agricultural biogas plants, found this genus as a major player, too.
The high frequency of the clostridial cluster genus MBA03_ge, with 6–29% abundance in the list of the major genera with >3% abundance, was also outstanding. MBA03_ge was recently reported to play a dominant role, with up to 21% abundance in the anaerobic degradation of lignocellulosic grass [
61] and during anaerobic degradation of a typical municipal thermophilic biowaste, including assorted lignocellulosic garden and vegetarian kitchen residues [
56]. Our discovery of this genus was more a coincidence. First, this novel genus was not detected in all samples, as the Silva database nr119 (from 2017) was applied (see
Section 2.4). However, the re-assessed informatics evaluation of the same molecular sample, with the more updated Silva database nr132 (version from 2019), exhibited the unexpectedly high abundance of MBA03_ge, as seen in
Figure 7A.
Furthermore, the list of major players (>3%) for straw digestion could be continued, with the abundance of 3–25% by the mesophilic
Caldicoprobacter and up to 7% by the unclassified Clostridium genus DTU014_ge. Additionally, the syntrophic thermophilic
Syntrophaceticus played, with 3–9% contribution of the abundance list >3%, a major role (
Figure 7A). Interestingly, these three genera, including MBA03_ge, were observed in a thermophilic municipal biowaste digester study, too [
56]. According to the authors [
56], the probable reason for the abundance of the three genera, during the long-term fermentation of biowaste, was the replacement of acetoclastic methanogenesis by syntrophic acetate oxidation, combined with hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. This view coincides quite well with the parallel, predominant occurrence of the hydrogenotrophic genus
Methanoculleus and
Methanothermobacter, under both mesophilic and thermophilic conditions of straw digestion (
Figure 5).
Another major player, observed under both fermentation temperatures, was the prementioned hydrolytic genus
Ruminiclostridium _1 (yellow), as well as the related ‘R. spec’ (
Figure 7A, B, orange), as also found by [
26,
73]. Similar to
Ruminiclostridium, the hydrolytic
Ruminofilibacter belongs to the hydrolytic class
Bacteroidia/family
Rikenellaceae [
65] and made up to 12% of the major players here (
Figure 7B). It also seems worthy to note that the dominant occurrence of the novel uncultured genus “UCG-001_ge”, which belongs to the order
Bacteroidales, made up almost 25% of the genera with >3% abundance, but only in the mesophilic straw fermenters (
Figure 7B).
As already mentioned, the hemicellulolytic
Herbinix was found with high abundance in the mesophilic fermenter F1, F3, and F4 (
Figure 7A, green). Its presence has also been reported in full-scale biogas plants, by [
26,
31,
67] and in this work (
Figure 7A–C).
Finally, saccharolytic, fermentative genera played a relevant role during the investigated long-term straw fermentation under CSTR conditions. Besides the unclassified genus of
Bacteroidia UCG-001_ge, the saccharolytic genus
Fermentimonas [
31,
49], fermentative genus
Proteiniphilum [
26,
32,
49,
56,
67,
74], and novel genus ‘DMER64′ played a major role. The authors of [
49] worked with a mesophilic (35 °C) batch system, using milled rice straw and pig manure as substrates. They found over 60% abundance of
Bacteroidetes (phylum level) and about 40–55% abundance of this novel genus ‘DMER64′ [
49]. In fact, ‘DMER64′ seems to be an excellent degrader of lignocellulosic biomass. Thus, a future microbiological characterisation study could validate the efficiency of this genus or its species.
Worth mentioning is the relevant occurrence of
Treponema_2, belonging to the class
Spirochaetia of the phylum
Spirochaetes, because it fits in the category of a highly selected straw degrading population (
Figure 7C). This genus was noted to degrade cellulosic biomass in full-scale anaerobic digesters [
75] and the rumen of a red deer [
76]. Additionally, some relevant genera failed to be assigned to known genera. For example, unclassified clostridial genera, designated as 1 (only mesophilic) and 2 (both meso- and thermophilic), were found to be major players, too (
Figure 7A).