Assessing and Resolving Model Misspecifications in Metabolic Flux Analysis
AbstractMetabolic flux analysis (MFA) is an indispensable tool in metabolic engineering. The simplest variant of MFA relies on an overdetermined stoichiometric model of the cell’s metabolism under the pseudo-steady state assumption to evaluate the intracellular flux distribution. Despite its long history, the issue of model error in overdetermined MFA, particularly misspecifications of the stoichiometric matrix, has not received much attention. We evaluated the performance of statistical tests from linear least square regressions, namely Ramsey’s Regression Equation Specification Error Test (RESET), the F-test, and the Lagrange multiplier test, in detecting model misspecifications in the overdetermined MFA, particularly missing reactions. We further proposed an iterative procedure using the F-test to correct such an issue. Using Chinese hamster ovary and random metabolic networks, we demonstrated that: (1) a statistically significant regression does not guarantee high accuracy of the flux estimates; (2) the removal of a reaction with a low flux magnitude can cause disproportionately large biases in the flux estimates; (3) the F-test could efficiently detect missing reactions; and (4) the proposed iterative procedure could robustly resolve the omission of reactions. Our work demonstrated that statistical analysis and tests could be used to systematically assess, detect, and resolve model misspecifications in the overdetermined MFA. View Full-Text
- Supplementary File 1:
ZIP-Document (ZIP, 663 KB)
Share & Cite This Article
Gunawan, R.; Hutter, S. Assessing and Resolving Model Misspecifications in Metabolic Flux Analysis. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 48.
Gunawan R, Hutter S. Assessing and Resolving Model Misspecifications in Metabolic Flux Analysis. Bioengineering. 2017; 4(2):48.Chicago/Turabian Style
Gunawan, Rudiyanto; Hutter, Sandro. 2017. "Assessing and Resolving Model Misspecifications in Metabolic Flux Analysis." Bioengineering 4, no. 2: 48.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.