Next Article in Journal
Utilization of Sugarcane Bagasse by Halogeometricum borinquense Strain E3 for Biosynthesis of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)
Previous Article in Journal
Additive Manufacturing of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate)/poly(ε-caprolactone) Blend Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Macroscopic Dynamic Modeling of Sequential Batch Cultures of Hybridoma Cells: An Experimental Validation
Article Menu
Issue 2 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Bioengineering 2017, 4(2), 48;

Assessing and Resolving Model Misspecifications in Metabolic Flux Analysis

Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Xueyang Feng
Received: 14 March 2017 / Revised: 30 April 2017 / Accepted: 22 May 2017 / Published: 24 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applying Systems Biotechnology Tools to Study Cell Metabolism)
Full-Text   |   PDF [851 KB, uploaded 24 May 2017]   |  


Metabolic flux analysis (MFA) is an indispensable tool in metabolic engineering. The simplest variant of MFA relies on an overdetermined stoichiometric model of the cell’s metabolism under the pseudo-steady state assumption to evaluate the intracellular flux distribution. Despite its long history, the issue of model error in overdetermined MFA, particularly misspecifications of the stoichiometric matrix, has not received much attention. We evaluated the performance of statistical tests from linear least square regressions, namely Ramsey’s Regression Equation Specification Error Test (RESET), the F-test, and the Lagrange multiplier test, in detecting model misspecifications in the overdetermined MFA, particularly missing reactions. We further proposed an iterative procedure using the F-test to correct such an issue. Using Chinese hamster ovary and random metabolic networks, we demonstrated that: (1) a statistically significant regression does not guarantee high accuracy of the flux estimates; (2) the removal of a reaction with a low flux magnitude can cause disproportionately large biases in the flux estimates; (3) the F-test could efficiently detect missing reactions; and (4) the proposed iterative procedure could robustly resolve the omission of reactions. Our work demonstrated that statistical analysis and tests could be used to systematically assess, detect, and resolve model misspecifications in the overdetermined MFA. View Full-Text
Keywords: metabolic flux analysis; model misspecification; constraint-based model; stoichiometric model; Chinese hamster ovary cell culture metabolic flux analysis; model misspecification; constraint-based model; stoichiometric model; Chinese hamster ovary cell culture

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material


Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Gunawan, R.; Hutter, S. Assessing and Resolving Model Misspecifications in Metabolic Flux Analysis. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 48.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Bioengineering EISSN 2306-5354 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top