Next Article in Journal
Effects of Graft Bending Angle on the Tensile Behavior of Bone Tunnel-Graft Constructs for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon–Bone Graft
Previous Article in Journal
Running Velocity as a Methodological Factor in Footwear Testing: Fixed Versus Self-Selected Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Viscoelastic Modeling for Failure Analysis of Human Vertebral Bone Undergoing Quasi-Static and Dynamic Compression
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

In Vivo Mechanical Demands on Vertebral Body Replacements During Rehabilitation Exercises: A Multidimensional and Longitudinal Analysis

1
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Metropolitana, 16132 Genoa, Italy
2
Department of Integrated Surgical Diagnostic Sciences (DISC), Orthopedic Clinic, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
3
Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
4
Department of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2026, 13(7), 753; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13070753 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 3 June 2026 / Revised: 23 June 2026 / Accepted: 24 June 2026 / Published: 26 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioengineering Technologies for Spine Research)

Abstract

Background: Mechanical complications remain a concern after vertebral body replacement (VBR), especially during rehabilitation. Yet exercise prescription is often guided by body posture or single loading measures. This study characterized mechanical demands during rehabilitation exercises after VBR and examined the effects of posture and postoperative time. Methods: Telemetric in vivo load data from instrumented VBRs in the OrthoLoad database were analyzed. A total of 119 trials across 21 exercises, performed in supine, prone, seated, and standing positions, were collected from five patients over 0.1–63 postoperative months. Mechanical demand was quantified across six biomechanical domains and integrated into a composite SafetyIndex. Posture- and time-related effects were assessed using linear mixed-effects models. Worst-case demand was defined as the 95th percentile of SafetyIndex values. Results: SafetyIndex showed a right-skewed distribution (median 8.5, IQR 3.7–14.1), with marked inter-exercise variability. Composite SafetyIndex did not differ between postures (all p > 0.13). However, posture-dependent effects emerged at the domain level: peak shear ratio was greater in prone than in sitting, standing, and supine positions (all p < 0.05); peak force was greater in standing than prone (p = 0.007 and p = 0.013 in unadjusted and adjusted models); and peak resultant moment was smaller in supine than prone (p = 0.036 and p = 0.046). Postoperative time was positively associated with peak force (β = +0.40 %BW/month, p = 0.042), peak resultant moment (β = +0.025 Nm/month, p < 0.001), and SafetyIndex (β = +0.25/month, p = 0.011), but not peak shear ratio (p = 0.879). Worst-case SafetyIndex_P95 values ranged from 0.6 to 85.0, with stable ranking across percentile thresholds (Spearman’s ρ = 0.995–0.997). Conclusions: Mechanical demand after VBR is task-specific and domain-dependent and cannot be inferred from posture alone. Axial and bending-related components increased over postoperative time, whereas shear-related loading remained task-dependent.
Keywords: vertebral body replacement; spine biomechanics; rehabilitation; implant loading; in vivo measurements; mechanical stratification vertebral body replacement; spine biomechanics; rehabilitation; implant loading; in vivo measurements; mechanical stratification

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

May, M.C.; Zanirato, A.; Puce, L.; Formica, M.; Biz, C.; Ruggieri, P. In Vivo Mechanical Demands on Vertebral Body Replacements During Rehabilitation Exercises: A Multidimensional and Longitudinal Analysis. Bioengineering 2026, 13, 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13070753

AMA Style

May MC, Zanirato A, Puce L, Formica M, Biz C, Ruggieri P. In Vivo Mechanical Demands on Vertebral Body Replacements During Rehabilitation Exercises: A Multidimensional and Longitudinal Analysis. Bioengineering. 2026; 13(7):753. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13070753

Chicago/Turabian Style

May, Maria Cesarina, Andrea Zanirato, Luca Puce, Matteo Formica, Carlo Biz, and Pietro Ruggieri. 2026. "In Vivo Mechanical Demands on Vertebral Body Replacements During Rehabilitation Exercises: A Multidimensional and Longitudinal Analysis" Bioengineering 13, no. 7: 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13070753

APA Style

May, M. C., Zanirato, A., Puce, L., Formica, M., Biz, C., & Ruggieri, P. (2026). In Vivo Mechanical Demands on Vertebral Body Replacements During Rehabilitation Exercises: A Multidimensional and Longitudinal Analysis. Bioengineering, 13(7), 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13070753

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop