A 3D Tissue-Engineering Model of Craniosynostosis to Study the Microenvironmental Signals Leading to Premature Suture Ossification
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Tissue Collection and Cell Isolation
2.2. Characterization of Cells Isolated from Patent Sutures, Fused Sutures and Calvarial Bone
2.2.1. Cell Characterization by Flow Cytometry
2.2.2. Cell Characterization by Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
2.2.3. Determination of Cell Intrinsic Osteogenic Potential Through ALP Activity and Calcium Production
2.2.4. Determination of Cell Intrinsic Chondrogenic Potential Through Sulphated Glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) Deposition
2.3. Fabrication of the 3D Culture Scaffolds
2.3.1. Bone-Mimicking Scaffolds
2.3.2. Suture-Mimicking Scaffolds
2.4. Cell Seeding on 3D Scaffolds
2.5. Characterization of Scaffolds
2.5.1. Evaluation of the Porous Architecture of 3D Scaffolds Using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
2.5.2. Assessment of ALP Activity and Calcium Production
2.5.3. Assessment of GAG Deposition
2.5.4. Histological Analysis of ECM Synthesis by Cells on 3D Scaffolds
2.6. Histological Analysis of Native Tissues
2.7. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Cells from Patent Sutures Retain Their Lineage-Specificity and Show Higher Multilineage Differentiation Potential than Fused Sutures
3.2. Calvarial Bone, Fused Suture and Patent Suture Tissues Showed Individualized Distinct Morphology, with Enhanced Mineralization in Fused Sutures
3.3. Cells Isolated from Fused Sutures Have the Strongest Osteogenic Response When Exposed to Osteoinductive Growth Factors
3.4. In 2D Culture, Cells Isolated from Fused and Patent Sutures Showed a Significant Enhanced Chondrogenic Response When Exposed to Chodroinductive Growth Factors
3.5. Tissue-Engineered Bone and Suture-Mimicking Scaffolds Displayed Distinct Microarchitectural Features Which Supported Cell Distribution Throughout the Culture Surface
3.6. Cells from Fused Sutures Are the Most Sensitive to Osteoinductive Growth Factors, When Cultured on Suture-Mimicking Scaffolds
3.7. Cells from Calvarial Bone and Sutures Showed Higher Chondrogenic Activity When Cultured in the 3D Suture-Mimicking Scaffolds and Simultaneously Exposed to Osteogenic Growth Factors
3.8. Cells from Calvarial Bone and Sutures Showed an Increased Sensitivity to Chondrogenic Growth Factors in Response to the 3D Chondroinductive Culture Conditions
3.9. Cells from Calvarial Bone and Sutures Showed an Enhanced Sensitivity to Chondrogenic Growth Factors, When Cultured on a 3D Chondroinductive Microenvironment
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Opperman, L.; Gakunga, P.; Carlson, D. Genetic Factors Influencing Morphogenesis and Growth of Sutures and Synchondroses in the Craniofacial Complex. Semin. Orthod. 2005, 11, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beederman, M.; Farina, E.M.; Reid, R.R. Molecular basis of cranial suture biology and disease: Osteoblastic and osteoclastic perspectives. Genes Dis. 2014, 1, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferguson, J.W.; Atit, R.P. A tale of two cities: The genetic mechanisms governing calvarial bone development. Genesis 2019, 57, e23248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, S.-W.; Sim, K.-B.; Kim, S.-D. Development and Growth of the Normal Cranial Vault: An Embryologic Review. J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 2016, 59, 192–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Doro, D.H.; Grigoriadis, A.E.; Liu, K.J. Calvarial Suture-Derived Stem Cells and Their Contribution to Cranial Bone Repair. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Fan, Y.; Ouchi, T.; Zhao, Z.; Li, L. Cranial Suture Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Insights and Advances. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stanton, E.; Urata, M.; Chen, J.F.; Chai, Y. The clinical manifestations, molecular mechanisms and treatment of craniosynostosis. Dis. Model. Mech. 2022, 15, dmm049390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lenton, K.A.; Nacamuli, R.P.; Wan, D.C.; Helms, J.A.; Longaker, M.T. Cranial suture biology. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2005, 66, 287–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barreto, S.; González-Vázquez, A.; Cameron, A.R.; O’Brien, F.J.; Murray, D.J. Identification of stiffness-induced signalling mechanisms in cells from patent and fused sutures associated with craniosynostosis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quarto, N.; Menon, S.; Griffin, M.; Huber, J.; Longaker, M.T. Harnessing a Feasible and Versatile ex vivo Calvarial Suture 2-D Culture System to Study Suture Biology. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 823661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Rekabi, Z.; Cunningham, M.L.; Sniadecki, N.J. Cell Mechanics of Craniosynostosis. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 3, 2733–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saini, D.; Williams, Q.L., Jr.; Alkureishi, L.; Patel, P.; Zhao, L.; Banerjee, P.; Huang, J.; Mathew, M. A systematic review of the latest technologies in Cranial Vault Remodeling and its outcomes for correction of craniosynostosis. Surg. Res. J. 2021, 1, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yapijakis, C.; Pachis, N.; Sotiriadou, T.; Vaila, C.; Michopoulou, V.; Vassiliou, S. Molecular Mechanisms Involved in Craniosynostosis. In Vivo 2023, 37, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thompson, D.N.; Malcolm, G.P.; Jones, B.M.; Harkness, W.J.; Hayward, R.D. Intracranial pressure in single-suture craniosynostosis. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 1995, 22, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kajdic, N.; Spazzapan, P.; Velnar, T. Craniosynostosis—Recognition, clinical characteristics, and treatment. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2018, 18, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rufai, S.R.; Jeelani, N.U.O.; McLean, R.J. Early Recognition of Raised Intracranial Pressure in Craniosynostosis Using Optical Coherence Tomography. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2021, 32, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thompson, D.N.; Jones, B.M.; Harkness, W.; Gonsalez, S.; Hayward, R.D. Consequences of cranial vault expansion surgery for craniosynostosis. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 1997, 26, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oppenheimer, A.J.; Rhee, S.T.; Goldstein, S.A.; Buchman, S.R. Force-induced craniosynostosis in the murine sagittal suture. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009, 124, 1840–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garrocho-Rangel, A.; Manriquez-Olmos, L.; Flores-Velazquez, J.; Rosales-Berber, M.A.; Martinez-Rider, R.; Pozos-Guillen, A. Non-syndromic craniosynostosis in children: Scoping review. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 2018, 23, e421–e428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, H.J.; Rice, D.P.; Kettunen, P.J.; Thesleff, I. FGF-, BMP- and Shh-mediated signalling pathways in the regulation of cranial suture morphogenesis and calvarial bone development. Development 1998, 125, 1241–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rice, D.P.; Aberg, T.; Chan, Y.; Tang, Z.; Kettunen, P.J.; Pakarinen, L.; Maxson, R.E.; Thesleff, I. Integration of FGF and TWIST in calvarial bone and suture development. Development 2000, 127, 1845–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Topa, A.; Rohlin, A.; Andersson, M.K.; Fehr, A.; Lovmar, L.; Stenman, G.; Kölby, L. NGS targeted screening of 100 Scandinavian patients with coronal synostosis. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2020, 182, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fitzpatrick, D.R. Filling in the gaps in cranial suture biology. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 231–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Veistinen, L.K.; Mustonen, T.; Hasan, M.R.; Takatalo, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Kesper, D.A.; Vortkamp, A.; Rice, D.P. Regulation of Calvarial Osteogenesis by Concomitant De-repression of GLI3 and Activation of IHH Targets. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sanchez-Lara, P.A.; Carmichael, S.L.; Graham, J.M.; Lammer, E.J.; Shaw, G.M.; Ma, C.; Rasmussen, S.A. Fetal constraint as a potential risk factor for craniosynostosis. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2010, 152A, 394–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chaicharoenaudomrung, N.; Kunhorm, P.; Noisa, P. Three-dimensional cell culture systems as an in vitro platform for cancer and stem cell modeling. World J. Stem Cells 2019, 11, 1065–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haugh, M.G.; Murphy, C.M.; O’Brien, F.J. Novel freeze-drying methods to produce a range of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds with tailored mean pore sizes. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2010, 16, 887–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cunniffe, G.M.; Dickson, G.R.; Partap, S.; Stanton, K.T.; O’Brien, F.J. Development and characterisation of a collagen nano-hydroxyapatite composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2010, 21, 2293–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cunniffe, G.M.; Curtin, C.M.; Thompson, E.M.; Dickson, G.R.; O’Brien, F.J. Content-Dependent Osteogenic Response of Nanohydroxyapatite: An in Vitro and in Vivo Assessment within Collagen-Based Scaffolds. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 23477–23488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- O’Brien, F.J.; Harley, B.A.; Yannas, I.V.; Gibson, L. Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 1077–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matsiko, A.; Levingstone, T.J.; O’Brien, F.J.; Gleeson, J.P. Addition of hyaluronic acid improves cellular infiltration and promotes early-stage chondrogenesis in a collagen-based scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2012, 11, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Levingstone, T.J.; Thompson, E.; Matsiko, A.; Schepens, A.; Gleeson, J.P.; O’Brien, F.J. Multi-layered collagen-based scaffolds for osteochondral defect repair in rabbits. Acta Biomater. 2016, 32, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Intini, C.; Hodgkinson, T.; Casey, S.M.; Gleeson, J.P.; O’Brien, F.J. Highly Porous Type II Collagen-Containing Scaffolds for Enhanced Cartilage Repair with Reduced Hypertrophic Cartilage Formation. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Isern, J.; García-García, A.; Martín, A.M.; Arranz, L.; Martín-Pérez, D.; Torroja, C.; Sánchez-Cabo, F.; Méndez-Ferrer, S. The neural crest is a source of mesenchymal stem cells with specialized hematopoietic stem cell niche function. eLife 2014, 3, e03696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maruyama, T.; Jeong, J.; Sheu, T.J.; Hsu, W. Stem cells of the suture mesenchyme in craniofacial bone development, repair and regeneration. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, H.; Feng, J.; Ho, T.V.; Grimes, W.; Urata, M.; Chai, Y. The suture provides a niche for mesenchymal stem cells of craniofacial bones. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Katsianou, M.A.; Adamopoulos, C.; Vastardis, H.; Basdra, E.K. Signaling mechanisms implicated in cranial sutures pathophysiology: Craniosynostosis. BBA Clin. 2016, 6, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, D.; Jiang, X.; Xiao, J.; Liu, C. A novel perspective of calvarial development: The cranial morphogenesis and differentiation regulated by dura mater. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2024, 12, 1420891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.; Adachi, T. Cell Condensation Triggers the Differentiation of Osteoblast Precursor Cells to Osteocyte-Like Cells. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alvarez-Barreto, J.; Márquez, K.; Gallardo, E.; Moret, J.; Benítez, N.; Meyer, M.; Marsiccobetre, S.; Zujur, D. Mesenchymal stem cell culture on composite hydrogels of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles & photo-crosslinking chitosan. Rev. Mex. Ing. Biomed. 2017, 38, 524–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regelsberger, J.; Milovanovic, P.; Schmidt, T.; Hahn, M.; Zimmermann, E.A.; Tsokos, M.; Zustin, J.; Ritchie, R.O.; Amling, M.; Busse, B. Changes to the cell, tissue and architecture levels in cranial suture synostosis reveal a problem of timing in bone development. Eur. Cell Mater. 2012, 24, 441–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rona O’Rahilly, E.G. The Initial Appearance of Ossification in Staged Human Embryos. Am. J. Anat. 1972, 134, 291–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bok, S.; Yallowitz, A.R.; Sun, J.; McCormick, J.; Cung, M.; Hu, L.; Lalani, S.; Li, Z.; Sosa, B.R.; Baumgartner, T.; et al. A multi-stem cell basis for craniosynostosis and calvarial mineralization. Nature 2023, 621, 804–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Opperman, L.A.; Adab, K.; Gakunga, P.T. Transforming growth factor-beta 2 and TGF-beta 3 regulate fetal rat cranial suture morphogenesis by regulating rates of cell proliferation and apoptosis. Dev. Dyn. 2000, 219, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homayounfar, N.; Park, S.S.; Afsharinejad, Z.; Bammler, T.K.; MacDonald, J.W.; Farin, F.M.; Mecham, B.H.; Cunningham, M.L. Transcriptional analysis of human cranial compartments with different embryonic origins. Arch. Oral Biol. 2015, 60, 1450–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]












Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Meyer, M.; Rist Jonsdottir, H.; Amado, I.; Gutierrez Gonzalez, J.; Bracken, S.; Kaur, K.; Hodgkinson, T.; Murray, D.J.; González-Vázquez, A.; O’Brien, F.J. A 3D Tissue-Engineering Model of Craniosynostosis to Study the Microenvironmental Signals Leading to Premature Suture Ossification. Bioengineering 2026, 13, 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13070746
Meyer M, Rist Jonsdottir H, Amado I, Gutierrez Gonzalez J, Bracken S, Kaur K, Hodgkinson T, Murray DJ, González-Vázquez A, O’Brien FJ. A 3D Tissue-Engineering Model of Craniosynostosis to Study the Microenvironmental Signals Leading to Premature Suture Ossification. Bioengineering. 2026; 13(7):746. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13070746
Chicago/Turabian StyleMeyer, Mariangela, Holmfridur Rist Jonsdottir, Isabel Amado, Javier Gutierrez Gonzalez, Shirley Bracken, Kulwinder Kaur, Tom Hodgkinson, Dylan J. Murray, Arlyng González-Vázquez, and Fergal J. O’Brien. 2026. "A 3D Tissue-Engineering Model of Craniosynostosis to Study the Microenvironmental Signals Leading to Premature Suture Ossification" Bioengineering 13, no. 7: 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13070746
APA StyleMeyer, M., Rist Jonsdottir, H., Amado, I., Gutierrez Gonzalez, J., Bracken, S., Kaur, K., Hodgkinson, T., Murray, D. J., González-Vázquez, A., & O’Brien, F. J. (2026). A 3D Tissue-Engineering Model of Craniosynostosis to Study the Microenvironmental Signals Leading to Premature Suture Ossification. Bioengineering, 13(7), 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13070746

