Detailed Kinematic Analysis Reveals Subtleties of Recovery from Contusion Injury in the Rat Model with DREADDs Afferent Neuromodulation

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in long-term locomotor impairments, and strategies to enhance functional recovery remain limited. While epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has shown clinical promise, our understanding of the mechanisms by which it improves function remains incomplete. Here, we use genetic tools in an animal model to perform neuromodulation and treadmill rehabilitation in a manner similar to EES, but with the benefit of the genetic tools and animal model allowing for targeted manipulation, precise quantification of the cells and circuits that were manipulated, and the gathering of extensive kinematic data. We used a viral construct that selectively transduces large diameter afferent fibers (LDAFs) with a designer receptor exclusively activated by a designer drug (hM3Dq DREADD; a chemogenetic construct) to increase the excitability of large fibers specifically, in the rat contusion SCI model. As changes in locomotion with afferent stimulation can be subtle, we carried out a detailed characterization of the kinematics of locomotor recovery over time. Adult Long-Evans rats received contusion injuries and direct intraganglionic injections containing AAV2-hSyn-hM3Dq-mCherry, a viral vector that has been shown to preferentially transduce LDAFs, or a control with tracer only (AAV2-hSyn-mCherry). These neurons then had their activity increased by application of the designer drug Clozapine-N-oxide (CNO), inducing tonic excitation during treadmill training in the recovery phase. Kinematic data were collected during treadmill locomotion across a range of speeds over nine weeks post-injury. Data were analyzed using a mixed effects model chosen from amongst several models using information criteria. That model included fixed effects for treatment (DREADDs vs. control injection), time (weeks post injury), and speed, with random intercepts for rat and time point nested within rat. Significant effects of treatment and treatment interactions were found in many parameters, with a sometimes complicated dependence on speed. Generally, DREADDs activation resulted in shorter stance duration, but less reduction in swing duration with speed, yielding lower duty factors. Interestingly, our finding of shorter stance durations with DREADDs activation mimics a past study in the hemi-section injury model, but other changes, including the variability of anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) height, showed an opposite trend. These may reflect differences in injury severity and laterality (i.e., in the hemi-section injury the contralateral limb is expected to be largely functional). Furthermore, as with that study, withdrawal of DREADDs activation in week seven did not cause significant changes in kinematics, suggesting that activation may have dwindling effects at this later stage. This study highlights the utility of high-resolution kinematics for detecting subtle changes during recovery, and will enable the refinement of neuromechanical models that predict how locomotion changes with afferent neuromodulation, injury, and recovery, suggesting new directions for treatment of SCI.