Next Article in Journal
Engineered Microenvironments for 3D Cell Culture and Regenerative Medicine: Challenges, Advances, and Trends
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Tissue Engineering in Manufacturing Absorbable Membranes to Improve the Osteopromoting Potential of Collagen
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mice Placental ECM Components May Provide A Three-Dimensional Placental Microenvironment

by
Rodrigo da Silva Nunes Barreto
1,†,
Ana Claudia Oliveira Carreira
1,2,†,
Mônica Duarte da Silva
1,
Leticia Alves Fernandes
1,
Rafaela Rodrigues Ribeiro
1,
Gustavo Henrique Doná Rodrigues Almeida
1,
Bruna Tassia dos Santos Pantoja
1,
Milton Yutaka Nishiyama Junior
3 and
Maria Angelica Miglino
1,*
1
Department of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo Cidade Universitária, Butantã CEP 05508-270, Brazil
2
Center for Natural and Human Sciences (CCNH), Federal University of ABC, Santo André CEP 09210-580, Brazil
3
Laboratory for Applied Toxinology, CeTIS, Butantan Institute, São Paulo CEP 05503-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this study.
Bioengineering 2023, 10(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010016
Submission received: 13 October 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 6 December 2022 / Published: 22 December 2022

Abstract

:
Bioethical limitations impair deeper studies in human placental physiology, then most studies use human term placentas or murine models. To overcome these challenges, new models have been proposed to mimetize the placental three-dimensional microenvironment. The placental extracellular matrix plays an essential role in several processes, being a part of the establishment of materno-fetal interaction. Regarding these aspects, this study aimed to investigate term mice placental ECM components, highlighting its collagenous and non-collagenous content, and proposing a potential three-dimensional model to mimetize the placental microenvironment. For that, 18.5-day-old mice placenta, both control and decellularized (n = 3 per group) were analyzed on Orbitrap Fusion Lumos spectrometer (ThermoScientific) and LFQ intensity generated on MaxQuant software. Proteomic analysis identified 2317 proteins. Using ECM and cell junction-related ontologies, 118 (5.1%) proteins were filtered. Control and decellularized conditions had no significant differential expression on 76 (64.4%) ECM and cell junction-related proteins. Enriched ontologies in the cellular component domain were related to cell junction, collagen and lipoprotein particles, biological process domain, cell adhesion, vasculature, proteolysis, ECM organization, and molecular function. Enriched pathways were clustered in cell adhesion and invasion, and labyrinthine vasculature regulation. These preserved ECM proteins are responsible for tissue stiffness and could support cell anchoring, modeling a three-dimensional structure that may allow placental microenvironment reconstruction.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The placenta plays an essential role in conceptus maintenance in the uterine environment, supplying oxygen, and nutrients and protecting it against harmful exogenous agents present in maternal blood flow [1]. The materno-fetal interaction has been investigated to understand the appropriate conditions for embryo and fetal development [2]. Early complications during embryo implantation impacts directly on placental development leading to gestational losses [3].
Several studies attempted to comprehend the physiological aspects of human placentation, most of them using explants and derived progenitor cells from unsuccessful or term pregnancies [4]. Mice placenta has been considered a classic placental model for several approaches due to their similar hemochorial placenta, including the development of transgenic animals for functional and molecular in vivo and in vitro studies [5,6,7,8,9]. In addition, mice’s placenta advantages include easy manipulation, small size, short generation time, and genetic homogeneity, followed by several morphological and functional similarities [6].
Despite these advantages and similarities, new three-dimensional and more versatile models to better mimetize the human placental microenvironment. For this purpose, tissue bioengineering strategies, such as placental fragments reconstruction, and applying cells and biomaterials are being explored [10]. However, information about trophoblast cell culture in biological scaffolds is scarce.
Placental ECM not only contributes to structural support but also regulates cellular signaling-modulating processes such as proliferation and motility [11]. These models can also be applied for physiological and pharmacological assays, such as experimental vertical infections, toxic molecules investigation, and drug therapies [12]. However, the use of models that do not properly mimic the placenta environment leads to unreliable knowledge, which requires alternatives to characterize functional, structural, and molecular aspects of the placenta [13,14,15,16]. To overcome this problem, placental organoids from three-dimensional (3D) microenvironment culture, simulating the materno-fetal interactions, have been considered a reliable model to study molecular effects on the placenta [17,18,19,20,21]. Moreover, 3D cultures display better migration and invasion profiles, and resistance to viral and microbial infections [4,20,22,23,24].
Human and murine trophoblastic cell populations present a functional dynamism during placental development [25]. In mice, placental hormonal activity is restricted to the outer trophoblast layer (syncytiotrophoblast), while transport and barrier functions are majorly performed by the two inner layers (trophoblast giant cells and spongiotrophoblast) [6]. Mice’s placental transcriptional and proteomic profile during each embryonic stage elucidate several mechanisms in cell interactions, including its organization and maturation [26,27,28]. Differently, human placenta physiology cannot be precisely understood only by samples derived from term and unsuccessful pregnancies [4].
A suitable in vitro placental model is highly influenced by ECM tridimensional structure, where its architectural stiffness is essential [29]. As a transient organ, the placental ECM presents a unique plasticity profile due to short-time development and loss of function for placental release [30]. To produce a mouse placenta ECM as an innovative biomaterial to support cells growth and differentiation [31] is essential to know and maintain its composition profile based on structural proteins (collagens and elastin), adhesion glycoproteins (fibronectin, laminin, tenascins, and vitronectin), glycosaminoglycans (hyaluronic acid), proteoglycans (versican, syndecan, glypican, and perlecan), matricellular proteins (osteonectin, thrombospondin, tenascin, osteopontin) and metalloproteinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) [32]. Thus, this investigation considered and described the possibility of a new mice placental model, based on late pregnancy three-dimensional extracellular matrix microenvironment.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Decellularization Process

Placenta from E18.5 mice (N = 03, in each control and decellularized group) were obtained according to the protocol established by Barreto et al. [31]. The decellularization process was carried out using crescent concentrations of SDS (0.01%, 0.1%, and 1%), and 1% Triton X-100. This study was approved by the Ethical committee on the use of animals (No. 5669271015) from the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science of the University of Sao Paulo.

2.2. Mass Spectrometry Samples

Control (C1-C3) and decellularized (D1-D3) mice placenta biological replicates (n = 3) were processed accordingly established by Hedrick et al. [33], Matias et al. [34] and Barreto et al. [35]. Briefly, samples were homogenized with 1 mL (100 mM) ammonium bicarbonate solution (ABC); precipitated with acetone (1:4) at −20 °C for 16 h; reduced with 8 M urea and 10 mM DTT for 2 h at 37 °C; alkylated with 200 µM Iodoacetamide, digested with 0.1 µg/µL trypsin under a barocycler; and purified in C18 columns (300 Å, #SMM SS18V, The Nest Group, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA). The data generated by Orbitrap Fusion Lumos spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) were deposited in the Mendeley Data database in different datasets for control (doi:10.17632/yg5phbft32.1, accessed on 8 October, 2022) and decellularized (doi:10.17632/wkdsh9kf9t.1 accessed 8 October 2022) groups. The Orbitrap Fusion Lumos spectrometer has maximized instrument performance and flexibility allowing more confident, precise, and sensible detection even with a low sample number [36]. In addition, this instrument associated with a precise pipeline and batch analysis increases the data trustworthiness [37].

2.3. Data Collection and Bioinformatic Analysis

There was used the Label-Free Quantification MaxLFQ algorithm, a semi-quantitative protein analysis, from MaxQuant software (version v1.6.10.43) [38] with an FDR rate of 1% to compare the relative abundance of proteins based on the mice proteins database from Uniprot/Swissprot, for each control and decellularized mice placenta samples and respective replicates. Proteins identified in the contaminant database and the decoy database were removed. For the criterion for protein identification, it was considered that only peptides identified with the posterior error probability (PEP) ≤ 0.01 in at least one biological replicate, and the occurrence of at least one unique peptide. We considered the intensity values of the LFQ that are normalized by the Maxquant software based on the sum of the intensity of all peptides of all identified proteins. LFQ for each protein was considered when the intensity data were present in at least two out of three replicates. Further, the protein abundance and log2 fold change (log2(FC)) for each group were calculated based on the average quantification of biological replicates, identifying the significantly quantified proteins with a Fold Change higher than 1.5 (|log2(FC)| ≥ 0.585). Following there were conducted the ANOVA and T-test (p < 0.05) statistical tests to determine the protein p-values, using the Microsoft Excel software (Matias et al. [34]; Barreto et al. [35]). In addition, proteins that had a zero value in two of the three conditions were analyzed separately. The data quality was checked by means of correction graphs and principal component analysis. After, we selected ontologies related to ECM and cell junctions (Supplemental Table S1) on the cell component domain. Then, the filtered protein list was used for principal component analysis (PCA), which was applied to find which combinations of the differentially quantified proteins with a fold change higher than 1.5. The PCA analysis was performed using the R-statistics package FactoMineR [39] and Factoextra (http://www.sthda.com/english/rpkgs/factoextra, accessed on 8 October 2022) for graphical visualization. False Discovery Rate adjustment was calculated by the Bonferroni method. Enrichment analysis and functional classification for gene ontology terms (“enrichGO” function from R package clusterProfiler) [40]; proteins enrichment in KEGG pathways (“enrichKEGG” function from clusterProfiler package and Pathviews package from R) [41]; and biological network interactions of proteins (NetworkAnalyst [42]). The Clustering analysis was performed using R statistical software version 3.6.3 (http://www.R-project.org, accessed 8 October 2022). The set of protein dissimilarities were computed using the “Euclidean” distance with the function “dist” to the hierarchical clustering based on the package and function “hclust”. There was employed the agglomerative method with “ward.D2”. All bioinformatics analysis was performed as described by Matias et al. [34] and Barreto et al. [35].

3. Results

ECM proteomic profiles from control and decellularized mice placenta were analyzed to determine if the remaining proteins could provide a tridimensional cell culture microenvironment. Principal component analysis (PCA, Spearman correlation) initially displayed that control and decellularized samples were spaced and clustered by biological replicates in separated quadrants, consistent with their respective condition (Figure 1). On PCA, decellularized quadrant enriched several collagen types, whereas the control quadrant enriched proteins related to cell adhesion (i.e., Vtn, Nid1, Lamc, and Ckap4).
The MaxQuant assembling of mass spectrometry detected peptides, generating a list of 2317 proteins and 118 (5.1%) proteins resulting from ECM and cell junction-related ontologies filtering. From those proteins, using fold change (higher than 1.5) and p-value (0.05), 40 (33.9%) proteins were overregulated in control mice placenta, whereas 76 (64.4%) had no significant differential expression between control and decellularized conditions. However, 2 (1.7%) of those were upregulated in decellularized mice placenta (Supplemental Table S2). From those, there were 76 proteins with no significant differential expression, several ECM proteins were preserved: collagens (Col1a1, Col4a1, Col4a2, Col6a1, Col6a2, Col6a3, Col14a1, Col18a1); laminins (Lama1, Lama4, Lama5, Lamb2, Lamc1); Fibrillin (Fbn1); Fibronectin (Fn1); glycoproteins [Bgn, Hspg2, Nid1] and cell junction-related proteins [Arvcf, Coch, Emilin1, Esam, Igf2bp1, Itga6, Lad1, Lims1, Mpp5, Parvb, Pak2, Pdlim1, Pdlim2, Pkp2, Plg, Pvr, Serpine1, Sorbs1, Tjp1, Tjp2, Utrn, Vasp, Vtn]. In addition, two collagens (Col1a2 and Col5a2) were upregulated in the decellularized placenta. Among the upregulated proteins in the control condition, some were related to ECM modulation (Htra1, Htra3, Plod3, Sparc), or cell adhesion (F11r, Itga2b, Itga5, Itgav, Lgals3bp).
In total, 25 ontologies of the cellular component domain were closely related, forming a unique interaction, with some inferred relationships (dotted lines) (Supplemental Figure S1). On the biological process domain, 63 ontologies were closely interacted (Supplemental Figure S2), while on the molecular function domain only 21 were interconnected (Supplemental Figure S3).
Inside the 30 more relevant ontologies from each of the three domains, we found 11 (36.7%) ontologies related to cell junction in the cellular component domain, six (20%) related to collagen, and another six (20%) related to lipoprotein particles (Supplemental Figure S4). In the biological process domain, 10 (33.3%) ontologies were related to cell adhesion, six (20%) to the vasculature, five (16.7%) to proteolysis, and three (10%) to ECM organization (Supplemental Figure S5). Finally, among the molecular function domain, 16 (53.3%) were related to protein binding, 11 (36.7%) to protein activity, and three (10%) with ECM resistance (Supplemental Figure S6).
The major pathways which enriched more proteins were: Focal adhesion (30.5%), ECM-receptor interaction (28.0%), Human papillomavirus infection (28.0%), PI3K-Akt signaling pathway (26.8%), Complement and coagulation cascades (19.5%) and Proteoglycans in cancer (14.6%) (Figure 2). Together those pathways enriched several collagen types and integrins. Other pathways were also enriched on several proteins (Supplemental Figure S7). The constructed String DB interactome assembled 80 (68%) proteins in just one cluster (Figure 3), showing the proteins’ major amounts are interconnected and have interacted function.

4. Discussion

This study described the ECM-related protein profile on late gestation mice placenta after the decellularization process to verify if the derived scaffold was suitable to provide a tridimensional microenvironment model for cell culture and bioengineering.
Several proteins were kept after the decellularization process, demonstrated by similar detection in control and decellularized tissues. Within those proteins, the different collagen types observed are involved in fibril-forming (Col1a1), basement membrane (Col4a1 and Col4a2), beaded filament-forming (Col6a1, Col6a2a, and Col6a3), anchoring fibril-forming (Col6a1, Col6a2a, Col6a3, and Col14a1), and multiplexing (Col18a1) collagens [43]. The collagen type presence on decellularized placenta attests to the tridimensional architecture preservation, since this architecture is assembled by collagen fibers, where the thicker ones (60–330 nm) are supportive, and the thinner ones (15–30 nm) complement the ECM lattice structure, keeping labyrinthine capillary net and other structures [31,44]. Furthermore, different collagen fibers stabilize the structure by anchoring themselves with other ECM molecules and neighbor cells [45].
Other non-collagen proteins that also present structural and adhesive functions, such as laminins (Lama1, Lama4, Lama5, Lamb2, Lamc1), fibrillin (Fbn1), and fibronectin (Fn1), were preserved as well. These proteins usually have binding domains to several collagen types, adding strength to the tridimensional structure maintenance [46]. Results related to the ECM architecture and ultrastructural organization after decellularization were already shown in mice and other rodents [31,44], bovine [35,47], and canine [48,49], which described the vascular architecture maintenance, and basement membrane proteins preservation. In addition, laminin, fibronectin, and vitronectin, together, interact with integrin receptors of trophoblastic cells, promoting their adhesion [50,51]. Integrin spatial distribution is variable in different placental compartments, like villous and extravillous trophoblasts in humans [52] and labyrinth, junctional zone, and decidua in mice [53]. Moreover, trophoblast cell lines migration and invasion depend on integrins, which are transmembrane glycoprotein receptors that regulate cell differentiation, motility, and adhesion by cytoskeletal reorganization [54,55,56]. Altogether, those preserved collagens and non-collagenous proteins are enough to support several phases of tissue reconstruction, providing the basic microstructure for adhesion, migration, and cell differentiation [48,57].
From the cellular component domain, the ontologies related to cell junction, collagen, and lipoprotein particles were the most enriched ones. These collagen types bind to domains of several adhesive and transmembrane proteins, attaching the cells to each other, to the basement membrane, or to ECM [46]. Cell junction and collagen ontologies are related to each other, and their proteins were maintained in decellularized mice placenta. Placental lipoprotein particle ontology is also essential for syncytiotrophoblast hormonal metabolism, as well as for high fetal requirements [58].
From the biological process domain, the enriched ontologies were related to vasculature, cell adhesion, proteolysis, and ECM organization. For vasculature modulation, such as ECM organization, the microenvironment modulation is dependent on the proteolysis, by hydrolytic proteins, to degrade the natural ECM structure, and control ECM deposition [45]. Furthermore, one of the control mechanisms for cell adhesion and detachment is the proteolysis of adhesive proteins, which is responsible for binding the cell membrane to the ECM structure [59,60]. Additionally, in the molecular function domain, the protein binding, protein activity, and ECM resistance ontologies were enriched. These three ontologies are closely related, because the ECM resistance is more dependent on their protein structural arrangement, instead of protein amount [61,62].
From the enriched pathways, we could cluster them in cell adhesion and invasion, and labyrinthine vasculature regulation for placental nutrition. The focal adhesion pathway was the one with more proteins enriched, being closely related to key signaling for cell adhesion or detachment. Focal adhesion is a multi-protein complex structure on the cell membrane that anchors the cytoskeleton directly to ECM, giving the ability for the cell to respond to chemical or physical changes [63]. ECM-receptor interaction pathway mediates the direct or indirect interaction between ECM and transmembrane molecules (majorly integrins and proteoglycans), to control several cell functions and invasiveness [64]. Proteoglycans in the cancer pathway play an important role in cellular adhesion and invasion and control proteoglycan location and function through microenvironment enzyme alterations [65]. The human papillomavirus infection pathway in the placental microenvironment can be related to increased cell proliferation and p53 signaling inhibition. Likewise, the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway regulates trophoblast cell proliferation by decreasing apoptosis [66,67]. Complement and coagulation cascades pathway are related to support unclothed blood in the labyrinthine blood sinus to maintain syncytiotrophoblast nutrition and support hypercoagulation during labor [68,69].
The ECM biology supports placental physiology, and any placental dysfunctions rapidly lead to ECM modification in structure and/or composition, such as in preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction [70,71,72,73], hypoxia [74], and cloned pregnancies [35,75]. Even in normal placentation, the placental ECM is plastic and intensely modulated due to decidualization, placental development, and fetal requirement [45].
Furthermore, the placental ECM protein content is a key to in vitro placental modeling [76]. Decellularized placental ECM has a large potential to be used for modeling materno-fetal interface due to several difficulties in conducting in vitro experiments using primary placental cells and chorionic villous explants [77]. Besides ECM composition, ECM stiffness also influences cell physiology, which can range from 0.2 kPa in the brain to 106 kPa in bone. Generally, the substrates used in cell culture have a stiffness different from the placenta tissues and directly influence placental cell survival [29]. For example, Matrigel® has a stiffness of 331 Pa, whereas decidua basalis and parietalis have 1250 and 171 Pa, respectively [29]. The placental ability for materno-fetal circulation gas exchange [78], and their complex vascular network [79] can be translated to lung modeling [80]. In addition, the placenta can be approached for clinical translation, optimizing in vitro barrier models for vertical transmission studies, and elucidating the effect of harmful molecules and pharmaceutical therapies.
Moreover, the ECM can influence normal and/or abnormal cell progression [81], such as in tumor progression and metastasis. However, ECM structure and stiffness can be altered by tumoral development (Barreto, unpublished data). On the other hand, bronchial asthmatic ECM received smooth muscle cells and they recellularized the bronchial scaffold, showing success [82]. Another example refers to ECM-derived hydrogel’s positive effects on pulmonary fibrosis treatment [83]. However, several in vitro models do not perfectly mimetize a species-specific placental environment [84,85]. Altogether, herein the detected ECM proteins, ontologies, and pathways support the idea that the decellularized mice placenta preserve a stable tridimensional microenvironment for materno-fetal in vitro modeling to reach multiple approaches on placental biology.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bioengineering10010016/s1, Please see the Supplementary Figures S1–S7 and Tables S1 and S2.

Author Contributions

R.d.S.N.B.: conceptualization, funding, data analysis, writing and revision; A.C.O.C.: data analysis, M.D.d.S., L.A.F., R.R.R., G.H.D.R.A. and B.T.d.S.P.: writing and revision; M.Y.N.J.: data analysis; M.A.M.: funding, writing and revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by The Sao Paulo Research Foundation [grant numbers 2014/50844-3 and 2015/14535-9] and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel [grant PNPD 88887.474193/2020-00 and PROEX 88882.327806/2014-01].

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethical committee on the use of animals (No. 5669271015) from the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science of the University of Sao Paulo.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data is available within the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brosens, I.; Pijnenborg, R.; Vercruysse, L.; Romero, R. The “Great Obstetrical Syndromes” Are Associated with Disorders of Deep Placentation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 204, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Schmid, B.P.; Honegger, P.; Kucera, P. Embryonic and Fetal Development: Fundamental Research. Reprod. Toxicol. 1993, 7, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zohni, K.M.; Gat, I.; Librach, C. Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Comprehensive Review. Minerva Ginecol. 2016, 68, 653–667. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Cherubini, M.; Erickson, S.; Haase, K. Modelling the Human Placental Interface in Vitro—A Review. Micromachines 2021, 12, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Carter, A.M. Evolution of the Placenta and Fetal Membranes Seen in the Light of Molecular Phylogenetics. Placenta 2001, 22, 800–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Carter, A.M. Animal Models of Human Placentation—A Review. Placenta 2007, 28, S41–S47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hemberger, M.; Hanna, C.W.; Dean, W. Mechanisms of Early Placental Development in Mouse and Humans. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2020, 21, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Moffett, A.; Loke, C. Immunology of Placentation in Eutherian Mammals. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 584–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leiser, R.; Kaufmann, P. Placental Structure: In a Comparative Aspect. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. 1994, 102, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Z.; Kurosawa, O.; Iwata, H. A Novel Human Placental Barrier Model Based on Trophoblast Stem Cells Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Tissue Eng.–Part A 2020, 26, 780–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kuo, C.Y.; Guo, T.; Cabrera-Luque, J.; Arumugasaamy, N.; Bracaglia, L.; Garcia-Vivas, A.; Santoro, M.; Baker, H.; Fisher, J.; Kim, P. Placental Basement Membrane Proteins Are Required for Effective Cytotrophoblast Invasion in a Three-Dimensional Bioprinted Placenta Model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.–Part A 2018, 106, 1476–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Carter, A.M. Animal Models of Human Pregnancy and Placentation: Alternatives to the Mouse. Reproduction 2020, 160, R129–R143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Arora, N.; Sadovsky, Y.; Dermody, T.S.; Coyne, C.B. Microbial Vertical Transmission during Human Pregnancy. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 21, 561–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Megli, C.J.; Coyne, C.B. Infections at the Maternal–Fetal Interface: An Overview of Pathogenesis and Defence. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 20, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sheridan, M.A.; Zhou, J.; Franz, A.W.E.; Schust, D.J. Modeling the Human Placenta to Investigate Viral Infections during Pregnancy. Front. Virol. 2022, 2, 831754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Roberts, D.J.; Edlow, A.G.; Romero, R.J.; Coyne, C.B.; Ting, D.T.; Hornick, J.L.; Zaki, S.R.; Das Adhikari, U.; Serghides, L.; Gaw, S.L.; et al. A Standardized Definition of Placental Infection by SARS-CoV-2, a Consensus Statement from the National Institutes of Health/Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development SARS-CoV-2 Placental Infection Workshop. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 225, 593.e1–593.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jaklin, M.; Zhang, J.D.; Barrow, P.; Ebeling, M.; Clemann, N.; Leist, M.; Kustermann, S. Focus on Germ-Layer Markers: A Human Stem Cell-Based Model for in Vitro Teratogenicity Testing. Reprod. Toxicol. 2020, 98, 286–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fliedel, L.; Alhareth, K.; Mignet, N.; Fournier, T.; Andrieux, K. Placental Models for Evaluation of Nanocarriers as Drug Delivery Systems for Pregnancy Associated Disorders. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, M.; Gong, J.; Gao, L.; Zou, T.; Kang, J.; Xu, H. Advanced Human Developmental Toxicity and Teratogenicity Assessment Using Human Organoid Models. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 235, 113429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tutar, R.; Çelebi-Saltik, B. Modeling of Artificial 3D Human Placenta. Cells Tissues Organs 2022, 211, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Almeida, G.H.D.; Iglesia, R.P.; Araujo, M.S.; Carreira, A.C.O.; Dos Santos, E.X.; Calomeno, C.V.A.Q.; Miglino, M.A. Uterine Tissue Engineering: Where We Stand and the Challenges Ahead. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2022, 28, 861–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Turco, M.Y.; Gardner, L.; Kay, R.G.; Hamilton, R.S.; Prater, M.; Hollinshead, M.S.; McWhinnie, A.; Esposito, L.; Fernando, R.; Skelton, H.; et al. Trophoblast Organoids as a Model for Maternal–Fetal Interactions during Human Placentation. Nature 2018, 564, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Sheridan, M.A.; Zhao, X.; Fernando, R.C.; Gardner, L.; Perez-Garcia, V.; Li, Q.; Marsh, S.G.E.; Hamilton, R.; Moffett, A.; Turco, M.Y. Characterization of Primary Models of Human Trophoblast. Development 2021, 148, dev199749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Haider, S.; Meinhardt, G.; Saleh, L.; Kunihs, V.; Gamperl, M.; Kaindl, U.; Ellinger, A.; Burkard, T.R.; Fiala, C.; Pollheimer, J.; et al. Self-Renewing Trophoblast Organoids Recapitulate the Developmental Program of the Early Human Placenta. Stem Cell Rep. 2018, 11, 537–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Bischof, P.; Campana, A. Trophoblast Differentiation and Invasion: Its Significance for Human Embryo Implantation. Early Pregnancy 1997, 3, 81–95. [Google Scholar]
  26. Majewska, M.; Lipka, A.; Paukszto, L.; Jastrzebski, J.P.; Myszczynski, K.; Gowkielewicz, M.; Jozwik, M.; Majewski, M.K. Transcriptome Profile of the Human Placenta. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2017, 17, 551–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Kim, J.; Zhao, K.; Jiang, P.; Lu, Z.-X.; Wang, J.; Murray, J.C.; Xing, Y. Transcriptome Landscape of the Human Placenta. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Abdulghani, M.; Song, G.; Kaur, H.; Walley, J.W.; Tuteja, G. Comparative Analysis of the Transcriptome and Proteome during Mouse Placental Development. J. Proteome Res. 2019, 18, 2088–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abbas, Y.; Carnicer-Lombarte, A.; Gardner, L.; Thomas, J.; Brosens, J.J.; Moffett, A.; Sharkey, A.M.; Franze, K.; Burton, G.J.; Oyen, M.L. Tissue Stiffness at the Human Maternal-Fetal Interface. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 1999–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Benedictus, L.; Thomas, A.J.; Jorritsma, R.; Davies, C.J.; Koets, A.P. Two-Way Calf to Dam Major Histocompatibility Class I Compatibility Increases Risk for Retained Placenta in Cattle. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2012, 67, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barreto, R.S.N.; Romagnolli, P.; Fratini, P.; Mess, A.M.; Miglino, M.A. Mouse Placental Scaffolds: A Three-Dimensional Environment Model for Recellularization. J. Tissue Eng. 2019, 10, 2041731419867962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pfarrer, C.D. Characterization of the Bovine Placenta by Cytoskeleton, Integrin Receptors, and Extracellular Matrix. Methods Mol. Med. 2006, 121, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hedrick, V.E.; LaLand, M.N.; Nakayasu, E.S.; Paul, L.N. Digestion, Purification, and Enrichment of Protein Samples for Mass Spectrometry. Curr. Protoc. Chem. Biol. 2015, 7, 201–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Matias, G.S.S.; Barreto, R.d.S.N.; Carreira, A.C.O.; Nishiyama-Junior, M.Y.; Ferreira, C.R.; Fratini, P.; Miglino, M.A. Proteomic Profile of Extracellular Matrix from Native and Decellularized Chorionic Canine Placenta. J. Proteom. 2022, 256, 104497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Barreto, R.d.S.N.; Matias, G.d.S.S.; Junior, M.Y.N.; Carreira, A.C.O.; Miglino, M.A. ECM Proteins Involved in Cell Migration and Vessel Formation Compromise Bovine Cloned Placentation. Theriogenology 2022, 188, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Levy, M.J.; Washburn, M.P.; Florens, L. Probing the Sensitivity of the Orbitrap Lumos Mass Spectrometer Using a Standard Reference Protein in a Complex Background. J. Proteome Res. 2018, 17, 3586–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Piehowski, P.D.; Petyuk, V.A.; Orton, D.J.; Xie, F.; Moore, R.J.; Ramirez-Restrepo, M.; Engel, A.; Lieberman, A.P.; Albin, R.L.; Camp, D.G.; et al. Sources of Technical Variability in Quantitative LC-MS Proteomics: Human Brain Tissue Sample Analysis. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 3586–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Cox, J.; Mann, M. MaxQuant Enables High Peptide Identification Rates, Individualized p.p.b.-Range Mass Accuracies and Proteome-Wide Protein Quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 1367–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lê, S.; Josse, J.; Husson, F. FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 2008, 25, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yu, G.; Wang, L.G.; Han, Y.; He, Q.Y. ClusterProfiler: An R Package for Comparing Biological Themes among Gene Clusters. Omi. A J. Integr. Biol. 2012, 16, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luo, W.; Brouwer, C. Pathview: An R/Bioconductor Package for Pathway-Based Data Integration and Visualization. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 1830–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhou, G.; Soufan, O.; Ewald, J.; Hancock, R.E.W.; Basu, N.; Xia, J. NetworkAnalyst 3.0: A Visual Analytics Platform for Comprehensive Gene Expression Profiling and Meta-Analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W234–W241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Shi, J.W.; Lai, Z.Z.; Yang, H.L.; Yang, S.L.; Wang, C.J.; Ao, D.; Ruan, L.Y.; Shen, H.H.; Zhou, W.J.; Mei, J.; et al. Collagen at the Maternal-Fetal Interface in Human Pregnancy. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 16, 2220–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Favaron, P.O.; Borghesi, J.; Mess, A.M.; Castelucci, P.; Schiavo Matias, G.d.S.; Barreto, R.D.S.N.; Miglino, M.A. Establishment of 3-Dimensional Scaffolds from Hemochorial Placentas. Placenta 2019, 81, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Katz, S.G. Extracellular Breakdown of Collagen by Mice Decidual Cells. A Cytochemical and Ultrastructural Study. Biocell 2005, 29, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Amenta, P.S.; Gay, S.; Vaheri, A.; Martinez-Hernandez, A. The Extracellular Matrix Is an Integrated Unit: Ultrastructural Localization of Collagen Types I, III, IV, V, VI, Fibronectin, and Laminin in Human Term Placenta. Coll. Relat. Res. 1986, 6, 125–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Barreto, R.d.S.N.; Romagnolli, P.; Mess, A.M.; Miglino, M.A. Decellularized Bovine Cotyledons May Serve as Biological Scaffolds with Preserved Vascular Arrangement. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2018, 12, e1880–e1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Matias, G.d.S.S.; Carreira, A.C.O.; Batista, V.F.; de Carvalho, H.J.C.; Miglino, M.A. Paula Fratini In Vivo Biocompatibility Analysis of the Recellularized Canine Tracheal Scaffolds with Canine Epithelial and Endothelial Progenitor Cells. Bioengineered 2021, 13, 3551–3565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Matias, G.d.S.S.; Rigoglio, N.N.; Carreira, A.C.O.; Romagnolli, P.; Barreto, R.d.S.N.; Mess, A.M.; Miglino, M.A.; Fratini, P. Optimization of Canine Placenta Decellularization: An Alternative Source of Biological Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine. Cells Tissues Organs 2018, 205, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kiyozumi, D.; Nakano, I.; Sato-Nishiuchi, R.; Tanaka, S.; Sekiguchi, K. Laminin Is the ECM Niche for Trophoblast Stem Cells. Life Sci. Alliance 2020, 3, e201900515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Seguin, L.; Desgrosellier, J.S.; Weis, S.M.; Cheresh, D.A. Integrins and Cancer: Regulators of Cancer Stemness, Metastasis, and Drug Resistance. Trends Cell Biol. 2015, 25, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Weitzner, O.; Seraya-Bareket, C.; Biron-Shental, T.; Fishamn, A.; Yagur, Y.; Tzadikevitch-Geffen, K.; Farladansky-Gershnabel, S.; Kidron, D.; Ellis, M.; Ashur-Fabian, O. Enhanced Expression of AVβ3 Integrin in Villus and Extravillous Trophoblasts of Placenta Accreta. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2021, 303, 1175–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nguyen, S.L.; Ahn, S.H.; Greenberg, J.W.; Collaer, B.W.; Agnew, D.W.; Arora, R.; Petroff, M.G. Integrins Mediate Placental Extracellular Vesicle Trafficking to Lung and Liver in Vivo. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ruoslahti, E.; Reed, J.C. Anchorage Dependence, Integrins, and Apoptosis. Cell 1994, 77, 477–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Humphries, J.D.; Chastney, M.R.; Askari, J.A.; Humphries, M.J. Signal Transduction via Integrin Adhesion Complexes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2019, 56, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Herdl, S.; Huebner, H.; Volkert, G.; Marek, I.; Menendez-Castro, C.; Noegel, S.C.; Ruebner, M.; Rascher, W.; Hartner, A.; Fahlbusch, F.B. Integrin A8 Is Abundant in Human, Rat, and Mouse Trophoblasts. Reprod. Sci. 2017, 24, 1426–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hill, A.B.T.; Alves, A.A.S.; Barreto, R.d.S.N.; Bressan, F.F.; Miglino, M.A.; Garcia, J.M. Placental Scaffolds Have the Ability to Support Adipose-Derived Cells Differentiation into Osteogenic and Chondrogenic Lineages. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2020, 14, 1161–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yañez, M.J.; Leiva, A. Human Placental Intracellular Cholesterol Transport: A Focus on Lysosomal and Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Friedl, P.; Bröcker, E.B. The Biology of Cell Locomotion within Three-Dimensional Extracellular Matrix. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2000, 57, 41–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chapman, H.A. Plasminogen Activators, Integrins, and the Coordinated Regulation of Cell Adhesion and Migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1997, 9, 714–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Smith, L.R.; Pichika, R.; Meza, R.C.; Gillies, A.R.; Baliki, M.N.; Chambers, H.G.; Lieber, R.L. Contribution of Extraellular Matrix Components to the Stiffness of Skeletal Muscle Contractures in Patients with Cerebral Palsy. Connect. Tissue Res. 2021, 62, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. López, B.; Querejeta, R.; González, A.; Larman, M.; Díez, J. Collagen Cross-Linking but Not Collagen Amount Associates with Elevated Filling Pressures in Hypertensive Patients with Stage C Heart Failure: Potential Role of Lysyl Oxidase. Hypertension 2012, 60, 677–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Murphy, K.N.; Brinkworth, A.J. Manipulation of Focal Adhesion Signaling by Pathogenic Microbes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhang, Q.J.; Li, D.Z.; Lin, B.Y.; Geng, L.; Yang, Z.; Zheng, S.S. SNHG16 Promotes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development via Activating ECM Receptor Interaction Pathway. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2022, 21, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Iozzo, R.V.; Sanderson, R.D. Proteoglycans in Cancer Biology, Tumour Microenvironment and Angiogenesis. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2011, 15, 1013–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ji, J.; Chen, L.; Zhuang, Y.; Han, Y.; Tang, W.; Xia, F. Fibronectin 1 Inhibits the Apoptosis of Human Trophoblasts by Activating the PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2020, 46, 1908–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Xu, Y.; Sui, L.; Qiu, B.; Yin, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X. ANXA4 Promotes Trophoblast Invasion via the PI3K/Akt/ENOS Pathway in Preeclampsia. Am. J. Physiol.—Cell Physiol. 2019, 316, C481–C491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ducat, A.; Vargas, A.; Doridot, L.; Bagattin, A.; Lerner, J.; Vilotte, J.L.; Buffat, C.; Pontoglio, M.; Miralles, F.; Vaiman, D. Low-Dose Aspirin Protective Effects Are Correlated with Deregulation of HNF Factor Expression in the Preeclamptic Placentas from Mice and Humans. Cell Death Discov. 2019, 5, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Pinheiro, M.B.; Gomes, K.B.; Dusse, L.M.S. Fibrinolytic System in Preeclampsia. Clin. Chim. Acta 2013, 416, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, J.; Khalil, R.A. Matrix Metalloproteinases in Normal Pregnancy and Preeclampsia. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2017, 148, 87–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Qu, H.; Khalil, R.A. Vascular Mechanisms and Molecular Targets in Hypertensive Pregnancy and Preeclampsia. Am. J. Physiol.—Heart Circ. Physiol. 2020, 319, H661–H681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ji, S.; Gumina, D.; McPeak, K.; Moldovan, R.; Post, M.D.; Su, E.J. Human Placental Villous Stromal Extracellular Matrix Regulates Fetoplacental Angiogenesis in Severe Fetal Growth Restriction. Clin. Sci. 2021, 135, 1127–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Moore, K.H.; Murphy, H.A.; Chapman, H.; George, E.M. Syncytialization Alters the Extracellular Matrix and Barrier Function of Placental Trophoblasts. Am. J. Physiol.—Cell Physiol. 2021, 321, C694–C703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Cartwright, J.E.; Keogh, R.J.; Patot, M.C.T. Hypoxia and Placental Remodelling. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2007, 618, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Barreto, R.D.S.N.; Miglino, M.A.; Meirelles, F.V.; Visintin, J.A.; da Silva, S.M.; Burioli, K.C.; da Fonseca, R.; Bertan, C.; de Assis Neto, A.C.; Pereira, F.T.V. Caracterização Da Fusão Caruncular Em Gestações Naturais e de Conceptos Bovinos Clonados. Pesqui. Veterinária Bras. 2009, 29, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mess, A.; Carter, A.M. Evolution of the Placenta during the Early Radiation of Placental Mammals. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.—A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2007, 148, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Aplin, J.D. Developmental Cell Biology of Human Villous Trophoblast: Current Research Problems. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2010, 54, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Carter, A.M. Factors Affecting Gas Transfer across the Placenta and the Oxygen Supply to the Fetus. J. Dev. Physiol. 1989, 12, 305–322. [Google Scholar]
  79. Barreto, R.S.N.; Romagnolli, P.; Cereta, A.D.; Coimbra-Campos, L.M.C.; Birbrair, A.; Miglino, M.A. Pericytes in the Placenta: Role in Placental Development and Homeostasis. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; Volume 1122, pp. 125–151. [Google Scholar]
  80. Fallon, B.P.; Mychaliska, G.B. Development of an Artificial Placenta for Support of Premature Infants: Narrative Review of the History, Recent Milestones, and Future Innovation. Transl. Pediatr. 2021, 10, 1470–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Myllyharju, J.; Kivirikko, K.I. Collagens and Collagen-Related Diseases. Ann. Med. 2001, 33, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ben Hamouda, S.; Vargas, A.; Boivin, R.; Miglino, M.A.; da Palma, R.K.; Lavoie, J.-P. Recellularization of Bronchial Extracellular Matrix With Primary Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021, 96, 103313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Evangelista-Leite, D.; Oliveira Carreira, A.C.; Gilpin, S.E.; Miglino, M.A. Protective Effects of Extracellular Matrix Derived Hydrogels in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2021, 28, 517–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Walker, C.K.; Krakowiak, P.; Baker, A.; Hansen, R.L.; Ozonoff, S.; Hertz-Picciotto, I. Preeclampsia, Placental Insufficiency, and Autism Spectrum Disorder or Developmental Delay. JAMA Pediatr. 2015, 169, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Walker, N.; Filis, P.; Soffientini, U.; Bellingham, M.; O’Shaughnessy, P.J.; Fowler, P.A. Placental Transporter Localization and Expression in the Human: The Importance of Species, Sex, and Gestational Age Difference. Biol. Reprod. 2017, 96, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Principal component analysis (PCA, Spearman correlation) plot from control (C1–C3) and decellularized (D1–D3) mice placenta. Those graphs show the consistency of each sample with their condition (control and decellularized).
Figure 1. Principal component analysis (PCA, Spearman correlation) plot from control (C1–C3) and decellularized (D1–D3) mice placenta. Those graphs show the consistency of each sample with their condition (control and decellularized).
Bioengineering 10 00016 g001
Figure 2. Six most relevant KEGG pathways enriched from detected filtered proteins on control versus decellularized mice placenta. The upregulated proteins are in red color and the downregulated ones in green color. (A). Proteoglycans in cancer pathway. (B) Focal adhesion pathway. (C) PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. (D) ECM-receptor interaction. (E) Complement and coagulation cascades pathway. (F) Human papillomavirus infection pathway.
Figure 2. Six most relevant KEGG pathways enriched from detected filtered proteins on control versus decellularized mice placenta. The upregulated proteins are in red color and the downregulated ones in green color. (A). Proteoglycans in cancer pathway. (B) Focal adhesion pathway. (C) PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. (D) ECM-receptor interaction. (E) Complement and coagulation cascades pathway. (F) Human papillomavirus infection pathway.
Bioengineering 10 00016 g002
Figure 3. Protein-protein interactions of the 118 proteins on control and decellularized mice placenta, according to the STRING database. Most proteins were connected in one big cluster, suggesting a strong functional relationship between them. The connecting nodes indicate protein-protein interactions with medium interaction confidence of 0.4.
Figure 3. Protein-protein interactions of the 118 proteins on control and decellularized mice placenta, according to the STRING database. Most proteins were connected in one big cluster, suggesting a strong functional relationship between them. The connecting nodes indicate protein-protein interactions with medium interaction confidence of 0.4.
Bioengineering 10 00016 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barreto, R.d.S.N.; Carreira, A.C.O.; Silva, M.D.d.; Fernandes, L.A.; Ribeiro, R.R.; Almeida, G.H.D.R.; Pantoja, B.T.d.S.; Nishiyama Junior, M.Y.; Miglino, M.A. Mice Placental ECM Components May Provide A Three-Dimensional Placental Microenvironment. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010016

AMA Style

Barreto RdSN, Carreira ACO, Silva MDd, Fernandes LA, Ribeiro RR, Almeida GHDR, Pantoja BTdS, Nishiyama Junior MY, Miglino MA. Mice Placental ECM Components May Provide A Three-Dimensional Placental Microenvironment. Bioengineering. 2023; 10(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barreto, Rodrigo da Silva Nunes, Ana Claudia Oliveira Carreira, Mônica Duarte da Silva, Leticia Alves Fernandes, Rafaela Rodrigues Ribeiro, Gustavo Henrique Doná Rodrigues Almeida, Bruna Tassia dos Santos Pantoja, Milton Yutaka Nishiyama Junior, and Maria Angelica Miglino. 2023. "Mice Placental ECM Components May Provide A Three-Dimensional Placental Microenvironment" Bioengineering 10, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010016

APA Style

Barreto, R. d. S. N., Carreira, A. C. O., Silva, M. D. d., Fernandes, L. A., Ribeiro, R. R., Almeida, G. H. D. R., Pantoja, B. T. d. S., Nishiyama Junior, M. Y., & Miglino, M. A. (2023). Mice Placental ECM Components May Provide A Three-Dimensional Placental Microenvironment. Bioengineering, 10(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010016

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop