Next Article in Journal
Application of HEC-HMS in a Cold Region Watershed and Use of RADARSAT-2 Soil Moisture in Initializing the Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Flood Warning System and Flood Inundation Mapping Using Field Survey and LiDAR Data for the Grand River near the City of Painesville, Ohio
Previous Article in Journal
Exact and Approximate Solutions of Fractional Partial Differential Equations for Water Movement in Soils
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydrodynamic Modeling of Nokoué Lake in Benin
Open AccessArticle

A Multi-Faceted Debris-Flood Hazard Assessment for Cougar Creek, Alberta, Canada

BGC Engineering Inc., Suite 500-980 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 0C8, Canada
BGC Engineering Inc., Suite 200-1121 Centre Street, NW Calgary, AB T2E 7K6, Canada
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Angelica Tarpanelli
Hydrology 2017, 4(1), 7;
Received: 14 November 2016 / Revised: 6 January 2017 / Accepted: 16 January 2017 / Published: 25 January 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Floods and Landslide Prediction)
A destructive debris flood occurred between 19 and 21 June 2013 on Cougar Creek, located in Canmore, Alberta. Cougar Creek fan is likely the most densely developed alluvial fan in Canada. While no lives were lost, the event resulted in approximately $40 M of damage and closed both the Trans-Canada Highway (Highway 1) and the Canadian Pacific Railway line for a period of several days. The debris flood triggered a comprehensive hazard assessment which is the focus of this paper. Debris-flood frequencies and magnitudes are determined by combining several quantitative methods including photogrammetry, dendrochronology, radiometric dating, test pit logging, empirical relationships between rainfall volumes and sediment volumes, and landslide dam outburst flood modeling. The data analysis suggests that three distinct process types act in the watershed. The most frequent process is normal or “clearwater” floods. Less frequent but more damaging are debris floods during which excessive amounts of bedload are transported on the fan, typically associated with rapid and extensive bank erosion and channel infilling and widening. The third and most destructive process is interpreted to be landslide dam outbreak floods. This event type is estimated to occur at return periods exceeding 300 years. Using a cumulative magnitude frequency technique, the data for conventional debris floods were plotted up to the 100–300s year return period. A peak-over-threshold approach was used for landslide dam outbreak floods occurring at return periods exceeding 300 years, as not all such events were identified during test trenching. Hydrographs for 6 return period classes were approximated by using the estimated peak discharges and fitting the hydrograph shape to integrate to the debris flood volumes as determined from the frequency-magnitude relationship. The fan volume was calculated and compared with the integrated frequency-magnitude curve to check of the validity of the latter. A reasonable match was accomplished, verifying the overall relationship. The findings from this work were later used as input to a risk assessment seeking to quantify risk to loss of life and economic losses. The risk assessment then formed the basis for design of debris-flood mitigation structures. View Full-Text
Keywords: flood; debris; debris flood; debris flow; dendrogeomorphology; hazard assessment; watershed; landslide; rainfall; alluvial fan flood; debris; debris flood; debris flow; dendrogeomorphology; hazard assessment; watershed; landslide; rainfall; alluvial fan
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Jakob, M.; Weatherly, H.; Bale, S.; Perkins, A.; MacDonald, B. A Multi-Faceted Debris-Flood Hazard Assessment for Cougar Creek, Alberta, Canada. Hydrology 2017, 4, 7.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop