Next Article in Journal
Revisiting Cent-Fonts Fluviokarst Hydrological Properties with Conservative Temperature Approximation
Previous Article in Journal
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Hydrology in 2016
Article

Spatial and Temporal Variability of Potential Evaporation across North American Forests

1
Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
2
Pacific Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, 506 West Burnside Road, Victoria, BC V8Z 1M5, Canada
3
Competitiveness and Innovation Branch, Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resources Operations, Victoria, BC V8W 9C2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Matthew McCabe
Hydrology 2017, 4(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology4010005
Received: 18 October 2016 / Revised: 2 January 2017 / Accepted: 4 January 2017 / Published: 11 January 2017
Given the widespread ecological implications that would accompany any significant change in evaporative demand of the atmosphere, this study investigated spatial and temporal variation in several accepted expressions of potential evaporation (PE). The study focussed on forest regions of North America, with 1 km-resolution spatial coverage and a monthly time step, from 1951–2014. We considered Penman’s model (EPen), the Priestley–Taylor model (EPT), ‘reference’ rates based on the Penman–Monteith model for grasslands (ERG), and reference rates for forests that are moderately coupled (ERFu) and well coupled (ERFc) to the atmosphere. To give context to the models, we also considered a statistical fit (EPanFit) to measurements of pan evaporation (EPan). We documented how each model compared with EPan, differences in attribution of variance in PE to specific driving factors, mean spatial patterns, and time trends from 1951–2014. The models did not agree strongly on the sensitivity to underlying drivers, zonal variation of PE, or on the magnitude of trends from 1951–2014. Sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit (Da) differed among models, being absent from EPT and strongest in ERFc. Time trends in reference rates derived from the Penman–Monteith equation were highly sensitive to how aerodynamic conductance was set. To the extent that EPanFit accurately reflects the sensitivity of PE to Da over land surfaces, future trends in PE based on the Priestley–Taylor model may underestimate increasing evaporative demand, while reference rates for forests, that assume strong canopy-atmosphere coupling in the Penman–Monteith model, may overestimate increasing evaporative demand. The resulting historical database, covering the spectrum of different models of PE applied in modern studies, can serve to further investigate biosphere-hydroclimate relationships across North America. View Full-Text
Keywords: potential evaporation; evaporative demand; pan evaporation; climate trends potential evaporation; evaporative demand; pan evaporation; climate trends
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hember, R.A.; Coops, N.C.; Spittlehouse, D.L. Spatial and Temporal Variability of Potential Evaporation across North American Forests. Hydrology 2017, 4, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology4010005

AMA Style

Hember RA, Coops NC, Spittlehouse DL. Spatial and Temporal Variability of Potential Evaporation across North American Forests. Hydrology. 2017; 4(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology4010005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hember, Robbie A., Nicholas C. Coops, and David L. Spittlehouse 2017. "Spatial and Temporal Variability of Potential Evaporation across North American Forests" Hydrology 4, no. 1: 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology4010005

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop