Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Anomalies Due to the ENSO and Long-Term Changes in Extreme Precipitation Indices Using Data from Ground Stations
Previous Article in Journal
Agricultural Water Footprints and Productivity in the Colorado River Basin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Performance of a Citizen Science Based Water Quality Monitoring Program for Nitrates Using Test Strips Implemented in the Medjerda Hydrosystem in Northern Tunisia

1
Department of Planning and Environment, UR-GDRES, High School of Engineers of Medjez El Bab, University of Jendouba, Km 05 Route du Kef, Medjez El Bab 9070, Tunisia
2
Earth and Life Institute, GERU-Université Catholique de Louvain, Croix du Sud 2, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hydrology 2024, 11(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11010006
Submission received: 2 November 2023 / Revised: 20 November 2023 / Accepted: 23 November 2023 / Published: 1 January 2024

Abstract

:
Recent technological progress in water management of hydrosystems has been made to deploy efficient and effective water quality monitoring systems (WQMS). Among these, a citizen science (CS)-based water quality monitoring (WQM) program using test strips is considered as a smart tool that may aid in the production of reliable, continuous, and comprehensive data on the water quality resources of hydrosystems over a broad range of spatial and temporal scales. In this case study, the objective is to evaluate the performance of a CS-based WQM for nitrates assessment using test water quality strips for the Medjerda watershed in Northern Tunisia. Overall, 137 samples were collected from 24 sampling sites and were analyzed by 33 participants. Citizens involved in the program were regrouped in five citizen types according to their socio-economic characteristics. Statistical tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple correspondence analyses (MCA) were achieved to survey the goodness of fit of CS as a contribution to data collection in terms of the socio-economic profile of the participant. The results show that this tool could be reliable for obtaining the levels of nitrate in water samples. Water quality test trips can conveniently be used by citizens for WQM of nitrates when they are rigorously following the manufacturer’s instructions. Additional efforts in communication and training could help to improve the performance of this CS-WQM program for nitrate in the Medjerda watershed.

1. Introduction

Problems of environmental degradation, diseases, and economic stagnation caused by water pollution are increasing rapidly with population growth, urbanization, industrialization, and anthropogenic activities [1]. Pressures on water resources jeopardize the Africa Water Vision 2025 [2] and the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Most African countries have very limited experience of pollution control measures, and efficient pollution control strategies require efficient and effective water quality monitoring. Many additional monitoring efforts are needed to make pollution control measures effective and reach development goals related to water [3]. Hence, this WQM issue concerns all African countries, as the water quality of hydrosystems is central to human wellbeing and socio-economic development [2,4]. Water quality assessment is a prerequisite for evaluating SDG indicator 6.3 to ensure access for all to water, sanitation, and hygiene services. SDGs target 6.6 points to bolster and reinforce the interest of local communities in moving forward water and sanitation management and to inform on the most common pressures on water quality at the global level [5,6,7]. In order to reach this target, participatory WQM methods are suggested to be deployed [8,9].
Recent technological progress has been made to deploy efficient and effective water quality monitoring systems (WQMSs). Technological innovation in this area includes online automated data that capture pollutant sources monitoring [10], novel transmission networks [11], advanced data analysis software [12], remote sensing [13,14], the internet of things [15], smart sensors [16], paper strips, and kit tests [17,18,19,20]. Such technological innovation may aid in the production of reliable, continuous, and comprehensive data on water quality resources over a broad range of spatial and temporal scales. Furthermore, by developing community science techniques, any citizen may participate in WQM. With respect to CS-based WQM, data implications, success factors, and stories of CS-based WQM projects are reported in the literature [21,22,23,24,25,26]. In contributory projects, citizens are essentially included in data collection. In a collaborative structure, more types of partners are included. Citizens have control that is more decisional in this administrative structure. Such projects may be successful if there is adequate community and stakeholder support.
We assess in this case study the performance of a CS-based WQM program for nitrate based on test water quality strips for the Medjerda hydrosystem. Different citizen types (students, researchers, water operators, agricultural hand labor, farmers, and volunteers belonging to different social layers) were involved in CS-WQM data collection. We therefore analyze the performance in terms of citizen types and propose a correction mechanism of WQ observations in terms of citizen type.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area Description

Tunisia and Algeria share the waters of several transboundary rivers, notably the Medjerda River, which accounts for 37% of Tunisia’s surface water and 22% of its renewable water resources [27]. The present study focuses on the Medjerda catchment on Tunisian soil. The Medjerda River Basin (MRB) begins in North-Eastern Algeria and flows eastwards to Tunisia, at that point entering the Inlet of Utic in the Mediterranean Sea [28]. The population within the Medjerda hydrosystem was estimated to be 2.453 million in 2021 (20.8% of Tunisia’s population) [29], while the basin occupies 9.8% of the land area of Tunisia. Water resources produced were estimated at around one km3 of water per year, which is effective for domestic water production, irrigated agriculture and transfer to the eastern regions of the country. The precipitation average in the basin is about 350–600 mm/year, reaching more than 1000 mm/year in a small area and for 40 to 70 days of rain. The most common irrigation technique in the area is drip and surface irrigation. Irrigated perimeters are exploited at a rate of 73%, while existing perimeters are intensified at a rate of 80% [27]. The MRB faces many agro-hydrological challenges, in particular the deterioration of water quality due to inappropriate fertilizer use.
The sampling stations considered in this study are mainly from surface water resources. Yet, some groundwater resources are also considered (Figure 1). The first sub-watershed of Wadi Khalled has its outlet located just downstream of the Sidi Salem dam. The second sub-watershed is that of the Wadi Siliana, the outlet of which is located in the western city of Testour. The third sub-watershed corresponds to the medium valley of the Medjerda watershed located between Testour and Medjez El Bab. The last sub-watershed is the Lahmar wadi. Several samples were collected from other tributaries such as Wadi Mellegue, Wadi Tessa, Wadi BouHertma, Wadi Beja, and Wadi Zarga, located in the High Valley of Medjerda.

2.2. Sampling Sites and Nitrates Analysis

Overall, 137 samples were collected from 24 sampling sites and were analyzed by 33 citizens. Samples should be analyzed as soon as possible after sampling, preferably within a few hours. Sample bottles were cooled during the 24 h period between field sampling and laboratory analysis according to EN ISO 5667-3 standards [30]. Sampling sites were selected based on the distribution of the volunteers and the availability of reference WQM stations. For groundwater sampling, samples were collected directly from well discharge pipes and boreholes for at least a quarter of an hour during the pump operation. Low cost nitrate measurements were conducted using commercially available Velda Aqua Test Strips (6:1). Nitrate sample measurements were achieved by immersion of the test strips in the bottles for 5 s, waiting for approximately 1 min, and by referring to the color chart of the pads provided with the test strip. A short guideline to test strip use was consulted by the citizen trainers. In parallel, nitrate concentrations were also analyzed following the standard sodium salicylate method in the laboratory. Filters free of contaminants with an appropriate pore size, e.g., 0.40 µm Whatman filters, were used before laboratory standard nitrate analysis. In this method, nitrate reacts with available salicylate to yield the yellow-colored sodium paranitrosalicylate susceptible to spectrophotometric determination at 415 nm [31].

2.3. Participant Recruitment, Training and Socio-Economic Characteristics

The participants were recruited with the aid of local officers of the water sector (regional agricultural services, water treatment authority, national company for the exploitation and distribution of drinking water, etc.); through personal contacts with motivated and available volunteers mainly in the vicinity of Medjez El Bab city and through social media. The main socio-economic characteristics of the involved citizens are summarized in Table 1. Before their commitment, we first explained to the citizens the aim and purpose of the project. In addition, students from the School of Engineers of Medjez El Bab participated and were allowed to practice the use of the analytical test strips within the classroom under the assistance of the trainer, who was able to supply input and reply questions.
The methodological approach of this study consists of the following steps (Figure 2):
  • Organization of workshops and mini meetings to explain detailed procedures, precautions and operating techniques that will be used to perform the nitrates test strip measurements. This allowed complying with the participatory principle of a CS-WQM program.
  • Organization of a mixture of both theoretical and practical training activities (literature overview and demonstration of the test strips analysis using water samples). Training quizzes, periodic testing, and review of data for all participants were investigated to ensure reliability of test strip readings and to check that the use of test strips’ water quality met the training requirements. These activities enhance the level of training of the CS-WQM program and can affect the quality of the gathered data. It also ensures that the CS collected data consistently meet the standard requirements.
  • Organization of a Likert scale survey as a rating scale with a series of answer statements following interest and questions during training, volunteers’ commitment, and volunteers’ participation.

2.4. Statistical Data Analysis

Statistical correlation coefficients and ANOVA and MCA analysis were used to evaluate the goodness of fit of citizens’ data. Cronbach’s alpha is one of the most widely used indices to assess the reliability or internal consistency of questions asked during a survey. The MCA on the qualitative variables made it possible to construct a typology of citizens. To proceed with the typology of citizens, the Ward’s aggregation criterion according to Chebyshev’s metric was adopted. In order to represent the variations in the observations collected by the participants, we adopted the analysis of variance, which is a statistical tool measuring the dispersion of a set of data in relation to its mean. We also carried out a descriptive analysis of the data making it possible to summarize a set of data as a box plot. Descriptive statistics were additionally applied to the data collected by the citizens and those from the laboratory. Regression analyses were established in order to predict the observations obtained according to the standard protocols and those collected by the citizens. The regressions envisaged, of the linear type, were carried out for nitrates and those for each type of citizen and for two ranges of turbidity. Other variables, participation in the collection of samples, involved in the water sector, gender, eyeglasses and valuing the project’ objectives, were binary, and yes or no were used.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Variation Patterns of Nitrates Measurements

Across the reach of the sampling sites in the Medjerda watershed, nitrates levels measurements recorded using test strips and standard laboratory analysis indicated that the water quality is good in 98.5% (n = 135) of samples ([NO3] < 50.0 mg/L) and of low quality in 1.5% (n = 2) of samples ([NO3] > 50.0 mg/L) according to the national environmental hydrosystems’ water quality standards for nitrates in Tunisia. For the purposes of US-EPA standards, nitrates values of <1.0 mg/L indicate high-quality water. Excess nitrates values at higher concentrations of more than 10.0 mg/L, indicative of lower quality, can cause low levels of dissolved oxygen (hypoxia) and can become eco-toxic for hydrosystems under certain conditions. Variations in nitrates level measurements recorded seem to be related to fluctuations in turbidity (values exceeded 50 NTU and more than 1000 NTU). This is because turbidity values depend on rainfall and therefore on sampling dates and sites. Nitrates may be flushed across the reach of lower water quality sampling sites in Medjerda than other sites of the river by runoff from urban and agricultural surfaces during precipitation events. There are also spatial differences in nitrate concentrations across the sample sites on the Medjerda River (Table 2). The analysis of variance indicates that the citizen type and the water sampling sites significantly affect the nitrate measurements, with a probability lower than 5%. The hydrologic season does not significantly affect nitrate concentration. The only significant interaction is the citizen type x water source with a probability lower than 5%. Thus, the nitrate level is mainly related to the water source.

3.2. Reliability and Agreement between Nitrates Test Strips and Field Standard

Results show a high correlation between data collected from CS-water quality test strips and those obtained by standard methods (Figure 3). Nitrate-sensitive water quality test strips seem to be reliable in the 0–125 mg/L concentration range. Agreement between the citizen’s readings and the standard methods is observed by the comparison of the means and standard deviations of nitrate contents. The results show moderate to very good agreement between the results of citizen-based monitoring and the standard methods. Results also show a high correlation between data collected from CS-groundwater compared to CS-surface water quality test strips and those obtained by standard methods. Nitrate surface water quality test strips seem to be sensitive to variations in turbidity value.
Nitrate test strips provide slight reliability in the 0–10 mg/L nitrate concentration range where zero nitrates are indicated while the standard revealed measurable concentrations. However, the agreements are best for intermediate to high nitrates concentrations (i.e., 10 to 25 mg/L nitrates). Previous results revealed the critical importance of the interpretation of the test strip readings, especially in the range of 10 mg/L nitrates, i.e., the upper health advisory limit for nitrates in ground water [32]. Common interfering colloids agents may affect the reliability of nitrate test strips compared to standard methods. Good agreement was also obtained between nitrate data collected by citizens using test strips’ measurements and those from measurements by high performance liquid chromatography and colorimetric analysis [32], ion-selective electrodes, the Szechrome reagent method [33], and molecular absorption spectrometry [19,20].

3.3. Compensation of Turbidity Interference in Nitrate Measurements

In view of turbidity interference that leads to inaccuracy in nitrate measurements using test strips and standard laboratory analysis, a bias correction is made to compensate for the turbidity interference. The bias correction was specific for each citizen type and for two ranges of turbidity (Table 3). Despite potential interferences, standard method and test strips measurements were reliable as shown in a strong consistency across a wide range of turbidity values (R and R2 > 0.9). Nitrate measurements from the laboratory standard correlated well with nitrate test strips for each citizen types for turbidity values under 50 NTU. For each citizen types and for all citizens, equations slopes are significantly close to one, and intercepts are significantly close to zero at p < 0.05. Nitrate measurements from laboratory standard and test strips are affected by turbidity interference for values exceeding 50 NTU. For each citizen types and for all citizens, equation slopes are significantly different from zero (0.8 to 0.9), and intercepts are not significantly close to zero (from 0.6 to 6) at p < 0.05. It seems that suspended particles and other dissolved substances lead to an overestimation of nitrate measurements, which alters the appearance of the linear regression. Turbidity interference caused by many particles and dissolved solids, which soak up light as ultraviolet, highlights the need for checking test strips data to correct values under turbidity variation of samples and to enhance the performance of nitrate test strips measurements for the final data product. The presence of particles and other suspended solids that cause light scattering leads to a general overestimation of nitrate measurements and thus influences the color change in strip bands and absorption over the entire spectrum [19,34]. A sedimentation time of more than 15 min is operationally recommended to allow particulates and other suspended substances to become settled before reading the samples.

3.4. Citizen’s Typology for Nitrates Water Quality Monitoring

Projections of the citizens in the factorial plan are composed of the two main correspondence axes. The citizen types are defined according to the Ward criterion using the Chebyshev measure. The representation of citizens in the factorial plan shows the dispersion of five types of volunteers around the two axes (Figure 4). Regarding the personal interest of citizens in data collection on WQM in Medjerda, the factor that most motivates them is learning about the water quality analysis (57.6% of interest during training). The correlation matrix for transformed variables related to citizens involved in nitrates’ assessment using a strip test indicates that motivation and commitment levels are correlated with all the variables except for employment, wearing glasses, mode of observation and the relationship with the project team (Table 4). The factorial correspondence axis, explained variance, and eigenvalues of the citizens involved in nitrates’ assessment are summarized in Table 5 Two factorial correspondence axes with correlated variables of the citizens involved in nitrates’ assessment are identified:
  • Axis 1: Relevance of the project to the citizen’s attitude. Participants involved in the water sector showed commitment to the CS-WQM project, an interest during training sessions by addressing questions, and by following the water strip test learning instructions.
  • Axis 2: Citizen identification. Motivation levels of the participants are linked to their education level, main occupation, and relation with the project team and age.
We studied and categorized five types of citizens based on their education, commitment, motivation, socio-economic background, and how they were recruited into the group. Type 1, being motivated volunteers, have the lowest inertia while Type 3, being students with high and low inertia, considering the second and first axis. Regarding the personal interest of these types in data collection (57.6% of interest during training), previously achieved using the Likert scale survey, learning about water quality test strips analysis as a new easy tool for the WQM of Medjerda is considered the most important motivation factor in the project involvement. Citizens belonging to Type 2, mainly representing agricultural hand labor, have moderate inertia considering both axes. Types 4 and 5, being to researchers and water operators, have the highest values of inertia theses axis.
Typologies of citizen science based on involvement in research steps and goals are crucial. Success factors for CS in environmental monitoring may be considered during project steps (design, start, and during implementation) [34]. In previous studies, the level of involvement and influence in CS-WQM programs were categorized into three levels based on the Cornell Lab of Ornithology (CLO) (contribution, collaboration, and co-creation) [35]. A vast majority of the CS-WQM projects in previous case studies are of the contributory type, including most that collect water quality data, where citizens are responsible for gathering data information, while the scientists or experts are the ones who come up with the question and plan for the research. Goal-setting and data analysis should be reached at the citizen participation level [36,37]. The participation of citizens in other steps should lead to other typologies of CS than the CLO model. Education, resource management, and data collection are the goals distinguished for knowledge increase and outreach creation [38]. Participants who took part in the project felt like they belonged to the community and they were more likely to do things such as talking to people they know about the project or going to public meetings [39]. In this participative CS approach, levels of harmony, trust, and cooperation in society should be enhanced [40].
Box plots of nitrates collected by citizens using strips and those obtained by conventional methods for each citizen type and for two turbidity ranges across all sites in the Medjerda watershed are presented in Figure 5. Variations in nitrate level measurements recorded seem to be related to turbidity variations and citizen types. Besides turbidity interference in readings samples, educational, socio-economic background, and recruitment modality of citizens as well as the amount of nitrate had an influence on variations in nitrates’ measurements.

3.5. Futures Implications of CS-WQM

Because most African countries have very limited experience of CS-hydrological monitoring and pollution control, much effort is needed to build data collection capacity in WQM. An overview of CS related to hydrological monitoring and WQM in some African countries is presented in Table 6.
The African capacity is still often very poor compared to other continents as a component of WQM. Hence, Tunisia, like all African countries, should be concerned with the promotion of efficient use of such tools and a CS-based WQM approach for their socio-economic sustainable development and for tackling CC-related challenges. The CS-based WQM program in the Medjerda hydrosystem provides opportunities and benefits in terms of powerful smart tools for tackling CC challenges and their impact on water management. The CS-WQM approach in Medjerda has the potential to enhance conservation efforts by providing knowledge, motivating the public to take action, supporting scientific research, and involving citizens actively. The CS-WQM approach also provides a cheap way to gain knowledge and feedback on water monitoring and related policies by using non-traditional data sources and analytical skills, and by involving citizens. CS-WQM as a flexible and robust participative approach can induce socio-economic and institutional transformation, reduce water resource uses, increase ecosystem health, and induce functionality, resilience and integration of the ecosystem.
More community initiatives have to be undertaken progressively to monitor water quality across the Medjerda watershed. Besides contribution involvement of volunteers in data collection, participation should lead to collaboration and co-creation levels. We should be more engaged if we want to use CS to improve water governance and get citizens involved in local problems. We need to put more effort into improving communication, training, feedback, motivation, and connection to make this participatory approach in WQM even better. The attitudes of the citizens, their type and complete acceptance of test strips’ tools are the main factors that determine the success of a CS-based nitrates WQM program. This kind of CS-WQM approach has great potential for identifying local sources of nitrate contamination, which could ultimately be used to reduce the community’s impact on the Medjerda watershed.

4. Conclusions

This study presents the assessment of a ready-to-use, low-cost, and reliable test strips method used for monitoring nitrate water quality according to the CS approach for sustainable water resource management and assistance in decision-making in the Medjerda watershed. The results show that this tool could be reliable for obtaining the levels of nitrate in water samples. It can be concluded that, while standard methods are more reliable, rapid and simple measurements using the test trips can conveniently be used by citizens for the WQM of nitrates if citizens follow rigorously the manufacturer’s instructions. With adequate training of users, the test strips should allow for reliable, sensitive, and accurate nitrate water quality measurements. Motivation of citizens, recruitment, contribution, collaboration, and co-creation involvement levels will be a key factor in enhancing the CS-WQM program in Medjerda. Participant data collection of nitrate measurements can be used with governmental conventional data in supporting the monitoring of surface and groundwater water resources in the Medjerda watershed. The results of this case study will help in better design of CS activities in the Medjerda WQM and facilitate the achievement of the UN SDG.

Author Contributions

For research articles with several authors, S.C.: Water sampling, Data collection, Training citizens, Writing—original draft. K.R.: Water sampling, Data collection, Training citizens. S.K.: Water sampling, Review and editing, Supervision. E.S.: Water sampling, Data collection, Training citizens. M.V.: Review and editing, Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors received funding from the project ‘Smart Medjerda’ 1.1.2, partnership between ESIM, UCLouvain, and CERTE, from the “WBI” and Tunisia Joint Commission 2019–2023 and EauSIRIS Project C-5-3.2-35 “Programme IEV de coopération transfrontalière Italie Tunisie 2014–2020”. This research was realized at the Sustainable Management of Water and Soil Resources (GDRES).

Data Availability Statement

Data used for the WQM-CS of the Medjerda watershed presented in this study are available upon request from the author Safa Chaabane. Data are not publicly available and should be provided upon specific request.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge all participant volunteers for their contributions to the WQS readings during this investigation. The authors are also grateful to the water operators (CRDA, SONEDE, ONAS) for their collaboration.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Helmer, R.; Hespanhol, I. Water Pollution Control: A Guide to the Use of Water Quality Management Principles. WHO/UNEP. 1997. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/41967 (accessed on 14 December 2022).
  2. United Nations-Water/Africa (Agency); United Nations—Economic Commission for Africa; African Union; African Development Bank. The Africa Water Vision for 2025: Equitable and Sustainable Use of Water for Socioeconomic Development; Economic Commission for Africa: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  3. Peletz, R.; Kisiangani, J.; Bonham, M.; Ronoh, P.; Delaire, C.; Kumpel, E.; Marks, S.; Khush, R. Why Do Water Quality Monitoring Programs Succeed or Fail? A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Regulated Testing Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2018, 221, 907–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Koop, S.H.; Grison, C.; Eisenreich, S.J.; Hofman, J.; van Leeuwen, K. Integrated water resources management in cities in the world: Global solutions. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 86, 104137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nshimbi, C.C. SDGs and decentralizing water management for transformation: Normative policy coherence for water security in SADC river basin organizations. Phys. Chem. Earth 2019, 111, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. United Nations Environment Programme. Monitoring Methodology for SDG Indicator 6.6.1. 2020. Available online: https://wesr.unep.org/media/docs/projects/6_6_1_methodology_final.pdf (accessed on 22 January 2023).
  7. Hegarty, S.; Hayes, A.; Regan, F.; Bishop, I.; Clinton, R. Using citizen science to understand river water quality while filling data gaps to meet United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 6 objectives. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 783, 146953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mehdi, B.; Lehner, B.; Gombault, C.; Michaud, A.; Beaudin, I.; Sottile, M.F.; Blondlot, A. Simulated impacts of climate change and agricultural land use change on surface water quality with and without adaptation management strategies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 213, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Almendinger, J.E.; Huang, M.; Chen, X.; Leng, G.; Li, X. Climate change will pose challenges to water quality management in the st. Croix River basin. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 251, 302–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Meyer, A.M.; Fuenfrocken, E.; Kautenburger, R.; Cairault, A.; Beck, H.P. Detecting pollutant sources and pathways: High-frequency automated online monitoring in a small rural French/German transborder catchment. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 290, 112619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Shahmirnoori, A.; Saadatpour, M.; Rasekh, A. Using mobile and fixed sensors for optimal monitoring of water distribution network under dynamic water quality simulations. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 82, 103875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gunia, M.; Laine, M.; Malve, O.; Kallio, K.; Kervinen, M.; Anttila, S.; Kotamäki, N.; Siivola, E.; Kettunen, J.; Kauranne, T. Data fusion system for monitoring water quality: Application to chlorophyll-a in Baltic sea coast. Environ. Model. Softw. 2022, 155, 105465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, K.; Zhang, Y.; Li, N.; Wang, W.; Qin, B. Monitoring water quality using proximal remote sensing technology. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 803, 149805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Caballero, I.; Román, A.; Tovar-Sánchez, A.; Navarro, G. Water quality monitoring with Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 satellites during the 2021 volcanic eruption in La Palma (Canary Islands). Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 822, 153433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jamroen, C.; Yonsiri, N.; Odthon, T.; Wisitthiwong, N.; Janreung, S. A standalone photovoltaic/battery energy-powered water quality monitoring system based on narrowband internet of things for aquaculture: Design and implementation. Smart Agric. Technol. 2023, 3, 100072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Garrido-Momparler, V.; Peris, M. Smart sensors in environmental/water quality monitoring using IoT and cloud services. Trends Environ. Anal. Chem. 2022, 35, e00173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ormaza-González, F.I.; Villalba-Flor, A.P. The measurement of nitrite, nitrate and phosphate with test kits and standard procedures: A comparison. Water Res. 1994, 28, 2223–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. D’Alessio, M.; Rushing, G.; Gray, T.L. Monitoring water quality through citizen science while teaching STEM undergraduate courses during a global pandemic. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 779, 146547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chaabane, S.; Fehri, R.; Riahi, K.; Khlifi, S.; Vanclooster, M. Involvement of citizens in the measurements of water salinity using test kits in the Medjerda watershed (Northern Tunisia). In Water-Energy-Nexus in the Ecological Transition. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation; Naddeo, V., Choo, K.H., Ksibi, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chaabane, S.; Fehri, R.; Riahi, K.; Khlifi, S.; Vanclooster, M. Assessment of Citizen’s Measurements Using Test Strips for Water Quality Monitoring in Medjerda Watershed (Northern Tunisia). In UNESCO: Youth and Water Security in Africa. Youth and Water Security in Africa—UNESCO Bibliothèque Numérique; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jollymore, A.; Haines, M.J.; Satterfield, T.; Johnson, M.S. Citizen Science for water quality monitoring: Data implications of citizen perspectives. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 200, 456–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Capdevila, A.S.L.; Kokimova, A.; Ray, S.S.; Avellán, T.; Kim, J.; Kirschke, S. Success factors for citizen science projects in water quality monitoring. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 728, 137843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Quinlivan, L.; Chapman, D.V.; Sullivan, T. Applying citizen science to monitor for the Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 6.3.2: A review. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fehri, R.; Khlifi, S.; Vanclooster, M. Testing a citizen science water monitoring approach in Tunisia. Environ. Sci. Policy 2020, 104, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fehri, R.; Bogaert, P.; Khlifi, S.; Vanclooster, M. Data fusion of citizen-generated smartphone discharge measurements in Tunisia. J. Hydrol. 2020, 590, 125518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schäfer, B.; Beck, C.; Rhys, H.; Soteriou, H.; Jennings, P.; Beechey, A.; Heppell, C.M. Machine learning approach towards explaining water quality dynamics in an urbanised river. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 12346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rajosoa, A.S.; Abdelbaki, C.; Mourad, K.A. Water assessment in transboundary river basins: The case of the Medjerda River Basin. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 2021, 7, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hamdi, Y.; Chebana, F.; Ouarda, T.B.M.J. Bivariate drought frequency analysis in the Medjerda River Basin, Tunisia. J. Civ. Environ. Eng. 2016, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Institut National des Statistiques. Rapport Annuel sur les Indicateurs d’Infrastructure 2021. 2023, 1737–6386. Available online: http://www.ins.tn/sites/default/files/publication/pdf/infrastructure%202021.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  30. ISO 5667-3. Water Quality—Sampling—Part 3: Preservation and Handling of Water Samples. 2018, 5, 46. Available online: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/fr/#iso:std:iso:5667:-3:ed-5:v1:en (accessed on 21 November 2023).
  31. Rodier, J. L’Analyse de l’eau. Eaux Naturelles, eaux Résiduelles, eau de mer, 8th ed.; DUNOD: Paris, France, 1996; 1383p. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bischoff, M.A.; Hiar, A.M.; Turco, R.F. Evaluation of nitrate analysis using test strips: Comparison with two analytical laboratory methods. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1996, 27, 2765–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Naigaga, S.; Boyd, C.E.; Gaillard, P.; Abdelrahman, H.A.; Molnar, J.J. Assessing the reliability of water-test kits for use in pond aquaculture. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2016, 48, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Snyder, L.; Potter, J.D.; McDowell, W.H. An Evaluation of Nitrate, fDOM, and Turbidity Sensors in New Hampshire Streams. Water Resour. Res. 2018, 54, 2466–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Minkman, E. Citizen Science in Water Quality Monitoring Developing Guidelines for Dutch Water Authorities for Contributory Mobile Crowd Sensing. Master’s Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2015; 218p. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bonney, R.; Cooper, C.B.; Dickinson, J.; Kelling, S.; Phillips, T.; Rosenberg, K.V.; Shirk, J. Citizen Science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience 2009, 59, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cooper, J.O.; Heron, T.E.; Heward, W.L. Applied Behavior Analysis, 2nd ed.; Pearson: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wiggins, A.; Crowston, K. From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science. In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA, 4–7 January 2011; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Overdevest, C.; Orr, C.H.; Stepenuck, K. Volunteer Stream Monitoring and Local Participation in Natural Resource Issues. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 2004, 11, 177–185. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24707677 (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  40. Tulloch, A.I.T.; Hugh, P.P.; Liana, N.; Judit, S.; Tara, G.M. Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 165, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Weeser, B.; Stenfert Kroese, J.; Jacobs, S.R.; Njue, N.; Kemboi, Z.; Ran, A.; Breuer, L. Citizen science pioneers in Kenya—A crowdsourced approach for hydrological monitoring. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 631–632, 1590–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rufino, M.M.; Bez, N.; Brind’Amour, A. Integrating spatial indicators in the surveillance of exploited marine ecosystems. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Njue, N.; Stenfert Kroese, J.; Gräf, J.; Jacobs, S.R.; Weeser, B.; Breuer, L.; Rufino, M.C. Citizen science in hydrological monitoring and ecosystem services management: State of the art and future prospects. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 693, 133531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gomani, M.C.; Dietrich, O.; Lischeid, G.; Mahoo, H.; Mahay, F.; Mbilinyi, B.; Sarmett, J. Establishment of a hydrological monitoring network in a tropical African catchment: An integrated participatory approach. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2010, 35, 648–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Walker, D.; Forsythe, N.; Parkin, G.; Gowing, J. Filling the observational void: Scientific value and quantitative validation of hydrometeorological data from a community-based monitoring programme. J. Hydrol. 2016, 538, 713–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zemadim, B.; McCartney, M.; Langan, S.; Sharma, B. A Participatory Approach for Hydrometeorological Monitoring in the Blue Nile River Basin of Ethiopia; IWMI Research Report 155; International Water Management (IWMI): Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2013; 32p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kongo, V.M.; Kosgei, J.R.; Jewitt, G.P.W.; Lorentz, S.A. Establishment of a catchment-monitoring network through a participatory approach in a rural community in South Africa. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 14, 2507–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kosgei, J.R.; Jewitt, G.P.W.; Kongo, V.M.; Lorentz, S.A. The influence of tillage on field scale water fluxes and maize yields in semi-arid environments: A case study of Potshini catchment, South Africa. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2007, 32, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gräf, J. Potentials and Limitations of Community Based Water Monitoring—A Case Study in the Sondu Catchment, Kenya. Master’s Thesis, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Location of the sampling sites along the mainstream of the Medjerda watershed and its tributaries in Tunisian territories.
Figure 1. Location of the sampling sites along the mainstream of the Medjerda watershed and its tributaries in Tunisian territories.
Hydrology 11 00006 g001
Figure 2. Participants training and reading test strips nitrates measurements. (A) Guidelines for water quality test strips; (B) Demonstration of test strips reading for water operators; (C,D) Volunteers reading strips; (E) Training in site for agricultural hand labor; (F) Test strips for nitrates analysis (G) Theoretical training for scientists.
Figure 2. Participants training and reading test strips nitrates measurements. (A) Guidelines for water quality test strips; (B) Demonstration of test strips reading for water operators; (C,D) Volunteers reading strips; (E) Training in site for agricultural hand labor; (F) Test strips for nitrates analysis (G) Theoretical training for scientists.
Hydrology 11 00006 g002
Figure 3. Plot for nitrates CS test strips versus field standard methods.
Figure 3. Plot for nitrates CS test strips versus field standard methods.
Hydrology 11 00006 g003
Figure 4. Projection of the citizens in the factorial plan composed of the two main correspondence axes. The citizen types are defined according to the Ward criterion using the Chebyshev measure.
Figure 4. Projection of the citizens in the factorial plan composed of the two main correspondence axes. The citizen types are defined according to the Ward criterion using the Chebyshev measure.
Hydrology 11 00006 g004
Figure 5. Box plots of nitrates collected by citizen using strips and those obtained from conventional methods for each citizen type (A) Turbidity < 50 NTU; (B) Turbidity > 50 NTU. Type 1: Motivated volunteers; Type 2: Agricultural hand labor; Type 3: Students; Type 4: Researchers; Type 5: Water operators.
Figure 5. Box plots of nitrates collected by citizen using strips and those obtained from conventional methods for each citizen type (A) Turbidity < 50 NTU; (B) Turbidity > 50 NTU. Type 1: Motivated volunteers; Type 2: Agricultural hand labor; Type 3: Students; Type 4: Researchers; Type 5: Water operators.
Hydrology 11 00006 g005
Table 1. Main socio-economic characteristics of the involved citizens (%).
Table 1. Main socio-economic characteristics of the involved citizens (%).
Age (Year)<2525–4545–6060<
18.248.527.36.1
Main OccupationAgricultural LaborEngineer or StaffStudentResearcher
18.248.521.212.1
Number of Observed Samples<1515–2525–3030<
24.227.342.46.1
Educational LevelPrimarySecondaryHigher
27.315.257.6
Table 2. ANOVA analysis of nitrates collected by citizens under various variables.
Table 2. ANOVA analysis of nitrates collected by citizens under various variables.
Citizen Nitrates’ MeasurementsFp Value
Citizen type3.2720.011
Water source sampling sites31.1540.000
Hydrologic season (wet and dry season)2.5590.110
Citizen type × Water source2.7320.004
Citizen type × Hydrologic season0.7210.539
Citizen type × Water source × Hydrologic season2.0090.092
Table 3. Nitrates’ assessment in water samples according to citizen type for two turbidity ranges.
Table 3. Nitrates’ assessment in water samples according to citizen type for two turbidity ranges.
Citizen TypeNcitizensNsamplesEquationF Testp ValueR
Motivated volunteers9* 171Nlab = 1.052 × Nstrip + 0.114 × Turbidity1108.30.0000.9640.929
** 152Nlab = 0.868 × Nstrip − 0.028 × Turbidity + 6.094437.40.0000.9480.898
Agricultural hand labor7* 109Nlab = 1.073 × Nstrip − 0.067 × Turbidity927.50.0000.9720.945
** 46Nlab = 0.940 × Nstrip + 0.008 × Turbidity − 1.342233.30.0000.9710.942
Students6* 106Nlab = 1.000 × Nstrip + 0.597 × Turbidity262.20.0000.9400.884
** 50Nlab = 1.000 × Nstrip + 0.296 × Turbidity − 0.683155.00.0000.9530.908
Researchers4* 82Nlab = 1.000 × Nstrip − 0.645 × Turbidity408.80.0000.9690.953
** 8Nlab = 1.000 × Nstrip + 0.285 × Turbidity − 0.62938.40.0000.9790.958
Water operators7* 17Nlab = 0.917 × Nstrip − 0.059 × Turbidity34.50.0000.9380.881
** 52Nlab = 0.907 × Nstrip + 0.004 × Turbidity72.20.0000.9010.811
All citizens33* 485Nlab = 1.036 × Nstrip − 0.040 × Turbidity1890.70.0000.9600.922
** 308Nlab = 0.882 × Nstrip − 0.001 × Turbidity436.60.0000.9550.911
* Turbidity less than 50 NTU. ** Turbidity more than 50 NTU.
Table 4. Correlation matrix for transformed variables related to citizens involved in nitrates‘ assessment using strip test.
Table 4. Correlation matrix for transformed variables related to citizens involved in nitrates‘ assessment using strip test.
VariableMotivation LevelEducation LevelInvolved in Water SectorMain OccupationRelation with the Project StaffInterest during TrainingQuestions during TrainingCommitmentStrip Learning ModeNumber of Observed SamplesParticipation in Collection of SamplesAge * Gender* Eyeglasses* Valuing the Project’s Objectives
Motivation level
Education level0.123
Involved in water sector0.1760.186
Main occupation0.3980.4850.629
Relation with the project staff0.427−0.0400.4160.374
Interest during training0.2180.4050.6230.6030.017
Questions during training0.411−0.0190.6930.5850.4020.597
Commitment0.3930.4780.7170.6360.4250.4760.529
Strip learning mode0.4960.0510.6450.5430.4770.6550.8580.541
Number of observed samples0.419−0.0790.6260.4420.6250.3990.7710.5240.807
Participation in collection of samples0.1100.2890.4860.382−0.1400.6630.5680.3390.4720.254
Age 0.241−0.4100.156−0.0770.225−0.0410.2960.2010.2520.498−0.066
* Gender0.081−0.1130.0970.2340.2990.0020.1780.0500.1580.234−0.2310.048
* Eyeglasses0.2300.0290.5830.4040.3960.1600.5560.4470.4450.6030.2830.3540.056
* Valuing the project’s objectives0.2240.1810.3490.339−0.1480.7150.5910.2050.5410.2430.750−0.055−0.012−0.015
* Supplementary variable; bold coefficients are significant at 5% level.
Table 5. Factorial correspondence axis, explained variance, and eigenvalues of the citizens involved in nitrates’ assessment.
Table 5. Factorial correspondence axis, explained variance, and eigenvalues of the citizens involved in nitrates’ assessment.
VariableAxis 1: Relevance to the CitizenAxis 2: Citizen Identification
Motivation level0.2760.387
Education level0.0740.284
Involved in water sector0.6920.004
Main occupation0.5850.745
Relation with the project staff0.2790.317
Interest during training0.5300.516
Questions during training0.7720.718
Commitment0.6040.538
Strip learning mode0.7870.180
Number of observed samples0.6540.363
Participation in collection of samples0.3170.367
Age0.0650.490
* Gender0.0220.129
* Eyeglasses0.3260.033
* Valuing the project’s objectives0.2690.752
Cronbach’s Alpha0.9060.828
Active eigenvalue5.6354.909
% of Variance46.95740.908
* Supplementary variable.
Table 6. Overview of CS-related to hydrological monitoring and WQM in African countries.
Table 6. Overview of CS-related to hydrological monitoring and WQM in African countries.
CountryNumber of Sites/ParticipantsTime ScaleMonitoring FocusTrainingType of ProjectProgramReferences
Tunisia2 sites/8 participants1 yearDischarge measurementsYesCollaborativeTogether4Water projectFehri et al. [24]
3 sites/7 participants10 monthsRainfall monitoring Fehri et al. [25]
Kenya13 sites/ 125 participants1 yearWater levelyesContributoryn.a.Weeser et al. [41]
13 sites1 yearWater levelyesContributoryn.a.Rufino et al. [42]
Tanzania24 sites6 yearsWater flowyesCo-createdIMoMo/GINjue et al. [43]
39 sitesn.a.Water level & flow precipitationn.s.CollaborativeRACCGomani et al. [44]
Ethiopia8 sites>1 yearPrecipitation, stream water & groundwater levelsyesCollaborativeAMGRAFWalker et al. [45]
28 sitesn.a.Precipitation, water levelyesCollaborativen.a.Zemadim et al. [46]
South African.a.2 yearsStream flows & precipitationyesCollaborativen.a.Kongo et al. [47]
3 sites1 yearPrecipitationyesCollaborativen.a.Kosgei et al. [48]
Water quality monitoring
Kenya6 sites<1 yearWater qualityyesContributoryn.a.Gräf [49]
Tunisia12 sites/3 participants1 yearWater quality (Nitrates, Total alkalinity, and Sodium chloride)yesCollaborativeSmart Medjerda ProjectChaabane et al. [19]
12 sites/3 participants6 monthsWater SalinityyesCollaborativeChaabane et al. [20]
24 sites/33 participants1 yearWater quality (Nitrates)YesCollaborativeThis study
n.a.: not available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chaabane, S.; Riahi, K.; Khlifi, S.; Slama, E.; Vanclooster, M. Assessing the Performance of a Citizen Science Based Water Quality Monitoring Program for Nitrates Using Test Strips Implemented in the Medjerda Hydrosystem in Northern Tunisia. Hydrology 2024, 11, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11010006

AMA Style

Chaabane S, Riahi K, Khlifi S, Slama E, Vanclooster M. Assessing the Performance of a Citizen Science Based Water Quality Monitoring Program for Nitrates Using Test Strips Implemented in the Medjerda Hydrosystem in Northern Tunisia. Hydrology. 2024; 11(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chaabane, Safa, Khalifa Riahi, Slaheddine Khlifi, Emna Slama, and Marnik Vanclooster. 2024. "Assessing the Performance of a Citizen Science Based Water Quality Monitoring Program for Nitrates Using Test Strips Implemented in the Medjerda Hydrosystem in Northern Tunisia" Hydrology 11, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11010006

APA Style

Chaabane, S., Riahi, K., Khlifi, S., Slama, E., & Vanclooster, M. (2024). Assessing the Performance of a Citizen Science Based Water Quality Monitoring Program for Nitrates Using Test Strips Implemented in the Medjerda Hydrosystem in Northern Tunisia. Hydrology, 11(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11010006

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop