Next Article in Journal
Training of Artificial Neural Networks Using Information-Rich Data
Previous Article in Journal
Net Snowpack Accumulation and Ablation Characteristics in the Inland Temperate Rainforest of the Upper Fraser River Basin, Canada
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Hydrology 2014, 1(1), 20-39;

Evaluating Three Hydrological Distributed Watershed Models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT

1,†,* , 1,†
Department of Bioresources Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H9X 3V9, Canada
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 December 2013 / Revised: 29 March 2014 / Accepted: 4 April 2014 / Published: 28 May 2014
Full-Text   |   PDF [2214 KB, uploaded 28 May 2014]   |  


Selecting the right model to simulate a specific watershed has always been a challenge, and field testing of watersheds could help researchers to use the proper model for their purposes. The performance of three popular Geographic Information System (GIS)-based watershed simulation models (European Hydrological System Model (MIKE SHE), Agricultural Policy/Environmental Extender (APEX) and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)) were evaluated for their ability to simulate the hydrology of the 52.6 km2 Canagagigue Watershed located in the Grand River Basin in southern Ontario, Canada. All three models were calibrated for a four-year period and then validated using an independent four-year period by comparing simulated and observed daily, monthly and annual streamflow. The simulated flows generated by the three models are quite similar and closely match the observed flow, particularly for the calibration results. The mean daily/monthly flow at the outlet of the Canagagigue Watershed simulated by MIKE SHE was more accurate than that simulated by either the SWAT or the APEX model, during both the calibration and validation periods. Moreover, for the validation period, MIKE SHE predicted the overall variation of streamflow slightly better than either SWAT or APEX. View Full-Text
Keywords: hydrology; MIKE SHE; APEX; SWAT; Canagagigue hydrology; MIKE SHE; APEX; SWAT; Canagagigue

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Golmohammadi, G.; Prasher, S.; Madani, A.; Rudra, R. Evaluating Three Hydrological Distributed Watershed Models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT. Hydrology 2014, 1, 20-39.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Hydrology EISSN 2306-5338 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top