Next Article in Journal
A Preliminary Study on the “Hitchhiking” of Radionuclides on Microplastics: A New Threat to the Marine Environment from Compound Pollution
Previous Article in Journal
Chronic Low-Dose Phoxim Exposure Impairs Silk Production in Bombyx mori L. (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae) by Disrupting Juvenile Hormone Signaling-Mediated Fibroin Synthesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Indoor Dust from South China and the Midwestern United States

1
College of Environment and Climate, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
2
SCIEX (China) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510623, China
3
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
4
College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan
5
MOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2025, 13(6), 428; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13060428
Submission received: 9 April 2025 / Revised: 11 May 2025 / Accepted: 21 May 2025 / Published: 23 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Identification of Emerging Pollutants and Human Exposure)

Abstract

In the present study, liquid chromatography–quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) was employed to analyze chlorinated paraffin (CP) homolog distributions and concentrations in household dust from South China and the Midwestern United States. The median levels of short-, medium-, and long-chain CPs (∑SCCPs, ∑MCCPs, ∑LCCPs) in South China were quantified as 23.1, 36.2, and 32.8 μg/g, respectively. Comparatively, the corresponding values in the Midwestern U.S. samples were 9.4, 39.5, and 15.4 μg/g, respectively. Notably, ∑LCCP concentrations in South China significantly exceeded those in the U.S. (p < 0.05), while no difference was found for ∑SCCPs and ∑MCCPs. Additionally, very short-chain CPs (C≤9) were detected in 13% of samples across both regions. The distribution of CP homologues in the dust samples from the two regions was similar, with C13, C14, and C18 groups as the predominant carbon homologue and Cl7-8, Cl7-9, and Cl9-10 as the predominant chlorine homologue of SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs, respectively. Risk assessment indicated dust ingestion-derived CP intakes for adults and toddlers were 2–5 orders of magnitude below reference doses. However, given other exposure pathways and the combined effects of CP monomers, the potential health risks from exposure via dust should not be underestimated.

1. Introduction

Chlorinated paraffins (CPs), a class of synthetic chlorinated hydrocarbons derived from paraffin, typically contain 40–70% chlorine by mass [1]. According to chain length, CPs are categorized into three classes: short-chain (SCCPs, C10-13), medium-chain (MCCPs, C14-17), and long-chain compounds (LCCPs, C ≥ 18) [1]. Owing to their exceptional thermal stability and chemical inertness, these compounds have become industrial high-production-volume chemicals, widely applied as flame retardants in polyvinyl chloride products, plasticizers in sealants/adhesives, and lubricant additives in metalworking fluids [1,2,3,4]. Consequently, extensive industrial production and usage have led to their ubiquitous presence across environmental matrices such as atmospheric particulates, terrestrial sediments, and biota [5,6,7,8]. Human biomonitoring studies further demonstrate pervasive exposure, with CPs detected in placental tissues, blood serum, and breast-milk samples [9,10].
Given the persistence, bioaccumulation, and long-distance mobility, great concern has been raised about the occurrence and pollution of SCCPs in recent years [11,12,13]. The manufacture and application of SCCPs are subject to strict controls in regions such as the U.S., Japan, Canada, and the European Union [5]. In May 2017, the Stockholm Convention classified SCCPs under Annex A as persistent organic pollutants, reinforcing global regulatory measures [14]. Despite the restrictions on SCCPs, the utilization and disposal of products containing them continue to permit their persistence in the environment for extended durations. Concurrently, regulatory limitations on SCCPs have led to increased reliance on MCCPs and LCCPs [15]. A limited number of studies have shown that MCCPs and LCCPs also have certain toxic effects and adverse health effects. For example, Deng et al. demonstrated that LCCP exposure impairs proliferation and autophagy in chicken embryo hepatocytes via oxidative stress [16]. Nevertheless, available environmental monitoring data for LCCPs remain significantly scarcer than for SCCPs.
House dust has been examined as an effective tool for assessing indoor environmental contamination and external human exposure risks [17]. Numerous studies have documented the widespread presence of diverse chemical contaminants in residential dust matrices [18,19]. Recent studies have demonstrated that dust ingestion serves as a significant external exposure pathway to CPs in the general population, ranking second only to dietary intake [5,20]. The occurrence of CPs, especially LCCPs, in house dust is limited. The complexity of mixtures and the difficulty of separation are the main challenges in analyzing CPs. Currently, systematic reports on LCCPs in indoor dust exist only for South Africa, Norway, Japan, and Australia, while data from China and the U.S. remain absent [2,21,22,23].
Recently, we have developed a method based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (QTOF-MS) to simultaneously detect SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs in ambient PM2.5 [24]. In the present study, we employed this method to measure the concentrations of CPs in house dust collected from South China and the Midwestern U.S. and compared the homologous profiles of CPs in the two regions. We also assessed external exposure of CPs via dust ingestion and dermal absorption. Our study addresses the deficiency of LCCPs in house dust from China and the United States and establishes a foundation for subsequent human health risk assessment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Chlorinated paraffin reference materials were obtained from Ehrenstorfer GmbH (Augsburg, Germany), including SCCP mixtures (C10-13; chlorine content: 51.5%, 55.5%, 63%), MCCP mixtures (C14-17; 42%, 52%, 57%), and LCCP mixtures (C18-20; 36%, 49%). Isotopically labeled standards of 13C10-trans-chlordane and tert-butyl-paraben-d9 were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Andover, MA, USA) and Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto, Canada), respectively. HPLC-grade solvents were primarily sourced from Oceanpak (Gothenburg, Sweden), with cyclohexane being the exception (Fisher Scientific, Hanover Park, IL, USA). Silica gel (63–100 μm), anhydrous sodium sulfate, and florisil (60–100 mesh) were all obtained from Merck (Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA). Before use, the florisil and silica gel were activated at 130 °C overnight. The acid silica gel (44%) was prepared by thoroughly mixing 44 g concentrated sulfuric acid with 56 g activated silica gel.

2.2. Sample Collection

A total of 38 house dust samples in Guangzhou, South China, from 2015 to 2016, and 15 house dust samples in Carbondale, Illinois, U.S., in 2017, were collected (Supplementary Table S1). Floor dust samples from the bedroom and the living room were collected using a commercial vacuum cleaner [25]. A custom-made nylon bag (25 μm pore size) was affixed to the vacuum cleaner nozzle (Electrolux, ZMO1511, 1400 W, Stockholm, Sweden) and vacuumed for 15 to 30 min at each dwelling. Prior to sampling, all the bags were ultrasonically cleaned with HPLC-grade methanol for 30 min. After collection, the nylon bag was removed from the cleaner, wrapped in aluminum foil, placed in a sealed bag, and transported back to the laboratory. The dust samples were removed from the nylon bag and sieved through a 125 μm stainless steel sieve, then stored at −20 °C until analysis. Field blanks were prepared using pre-cleaned sodium sulfate, undergoing identical vacuuming and processing protocols as the dust samples.

2.3. Sample Pretreatment and Analysis

Approximately 50 mg of sieved dust was fortified with 5 ng of 13C10-trans-chlordane as a recovery standard. The spiked samples underwent ultrasonic-assisted extraction using 3 mL of a dichloromethane/n-hexane mixture (1:1, v/v) for 20 min. After extraction, the supernatant was collected by centrifugation (4000 rpm for 5 min) and then transferred to a clean glass tube, and the extraction process was performed twice. The combined extraction solution was concentrated to 2 mL under gentle nitrogen. A multi-layered chromatographic column (1.5 cm i.d.) was prepared with the following stationary phases (bottom to top): 14 g florisil (deactivated with 1.5% of water), 2 g neutral silica gel, 10 g acid silica gel, and 4 g anhydrous sodium sulfate. Prior to sample loading, the column was pre-conditioned with 50 mL n-hexane to remove potential interferents. The concentrated extract was then introduced onto the column and eluted in two sequential fractions: 60 mL n-hexane and 80 mL n-hexane/dichloromethane (1:1, v/v). The second fraction was concentrated to near-dryness using rotary evaporation and reconstituted in 100 μL methanol for instrumental analysis.
The analysis of the CPs was conducted using UPLC paired with an X500R QTOF mass spectrometer (AB Sciex, Vaughan, ON, Canada), operating in full-scan mode. Additionally, gas chromatography–triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS, 7890B-7000D, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was employed to measure the recovery of the 13C10-trans-chlordane in each sample. Further methodological specifics, including instrumental parameters, are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

2.4. Quantification of CPs

The analysis of the CPs was conducted using UPLC-QTOF-MS in negative ion mode ([M − H]), where two diagnostic isotope clusters were monitored as qualitative and quantitative indicators. A total of 36 SCCP, 40 MCCP, and 115 LCCP congeners was used (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). The identification criteria included a mass accuracy of [M − H] ions within a 10 ppm error threshold, retention time deviation <±0.2 min from standards, and isotope ratios matching theoretical values within 15% tolerance. The quantification methodology employed the linear correlation between chlorine content and total response factors as established by Reth et al. [26].

2.5. Quality Assurance and Quality Control

Prior to use, all the glassware was heated at 450 °C for 6 h. Field blank samples (anhydrous sodium sulfate) were prepared along with the sample collection. Each batch contains ten samples and one laboratory blank sample (50 mg anhydrous sodium sulfate). Trace levels of SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs were identified in procedural and field blanks with a range of 0–13.4, 0–29.2, and 0–9.5 ng/g, respectively. The average recoveries of 13C10-trans-chlordane were 89% ± 21%. The limit of quantification (LOQs) of ∑SCCPs, ∑MCCPs, and ∑LCCPs were 15, 31, and 10 ng/g, respectively, calculated as ten times the standard deviation of procedural blanks.

2.6. Exposure Assessment

We estimated the daily intake (EDI, ng/kg BW/day) and hazard quotient (HQ, unitless) of CPs for adults and toddlers via ingestion and dermal absorption of dust-associated CPs. The EDI and HQ were determined using the equations as follows [20]:
EDI ingestion = C i × DIR × EF BW × BA
EDI dermal adsorption = C i × BSA × AS × AF × EF BW × BA
EDI Total = ( EDI ingestion + EDI dermal adsorption )
HQ = EDI Total TDI
where DIR represents the dust ingestion rate (g/day); Ci is the concentration of CPs in house dust (ng/g); EF is the proportion of daily time spent in residential environments (unitless); BA is the bioaccessibility of CPs (unitless); BW is body weight (kg); BSA is body surface area (m2); AS represents the adhesion rate of dust on the skin (g/m2); AF is the adsorption rate of CPs in the skin (unitless); and TDI is the tolerable daily intake (μg/kg/day). The TDI of SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs was uniformly adopted as 100 μg/kg/day [27], and the values of the other parameters used in this study are summarized in Table S4.

2.7. Data Analysis

The reported concentrations were recovery-adjusted using surrogate standards and corrected for procedural blanks. Compounds detected in >60% of samples underwent statistical analysis, with measurements below the limit of quantification (LOQ) substituted by LOQ/√2. Intergroup correlations were assessed using Spearman’s rank test, while Mann–Whitney U tests compared CP concentrations between the two regions. All analyses were performed in SPSS V2.0 (PASW Statistics 18.0, IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA), with significance set at α = 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Concentration of CPs in House Dust

SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs with at least one congener were detected in all of the indoor dust samples from South China and the Midwestern U.S. Notably, congeners with very short carbon chains (vSCCPs, C≤9) were detected in five China and two U.S. dust samples with a detection rate of 13%, and very long-chain CPs (vLCCPs, C≥20) were also detected in all samples. The total concentrations of CPs with C9 to C35 ranged from 22.2 to 466 μg/g (median: 100 μg/g) and 15.1 to 246 μg/g (median: 82.9 μg/g) in dust from South China and the Midwestern U.S., respectively (Table 1). Compared with other industrial chemicals widely reported in indoor dust, the concentration of CPs was lower than phthalates (median: 601 μg/g) [28], while much higher than that of organophosphate esters (median: 7.5 μg/g) [29] and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (median: 0.8 μg/g) [30]. The high concentrations and wide detection reflect the broad applications of CPs in household products, raising great attention to their ultimate destinations and subsequent risks to humans.
The median concentrations of ∑SCCPs, ∑MCCP, and ∑LCCPs in house dust were 23.1, 36.2, and 32.8 μg/g from South China and 9.36, 39.5, and 15.4 μg/g from the Midwestern U.S., respectively. Notably, ∑MCCP concentrations dominated in both regions, exceeding ∑SCCP levels in South China and surpassing both ∑SCCP and ∑LCCP concentrations in Midwestern U.S. samples (p < 0.05). This MCCP predominance aligns with global accumulative production patterns, where MCCPs constitute 57% of total CPs, compared to 28% for SCCPs and 15% for LCCPs [31]. However, the concentrations of ∑LCCPs substantially exceeded those of ∑SCCPs in dust from South China. This may be related to the use of some products that may contain LCCPs in households in Southern China. Another reason might be that our sampling area of South China has a subtropical climate with high temperatures, and SCCPs with lower octanol–air partition coefficients are more likely to volatilize into the gas phase. The concentrations of ∑LCCPs in house dust from South China were significantly higher than those from the Midwestern U.S. (p < 0.05). The same trend was observed for SCCPs, but the results were not significant, while no difference was observed for ∑MCCPs. The variations in production and consumption of CP products and related policies between the two countries may primarily account for the disparity of CPs in house dust between both locations. China’s dominant position in the CP market inevitably leads to substantial releases and resulted in relatively high levels of CPs in environmental media [31].
Numerous studies have documented the concentration of SCCPs and MCCPs in indoor dust (Table S5). South China’s house dust showed notably elevated ∑SCCP concentrations (median: 23.1 μg/g) compared to the Midwestern U.S. (9.36 μg/g), Norway (5.8 μg/g), and Australia (9.4 μg/g) but aligned with levels observed in South Africa (16 μg/g) and several Chinese cities (Harbin: 47.2 μg/g; Beijing: 98.7 μg/g; Qingyuan: 46.5 μg/g) [2,4,5,20,21]. The concentrations of ∑MCCPs in house dust from South China (median: 36.2 μg/g) and the Midwestern U.S. (median: 39.5 μg/g) were comparable to those found in house dust from Oslo, Norway (median: 21 μg/g); Pretoria, South Africa (median: 46 μg/g); and Australia (median: 95 μg/g) [2,21,22]. Although studies on LCCPs are relatively limited than on SCCPs and MCCPs (Table S4), our data were comparable to the concentration of LCCPs in house dust from Oslo, Norway (median: 8.1 μg/g); Pretoria, South Africa (median: 11 μg/g); Colombia (median: 13 μg/g); and Thailand (median: 12 μg/g) [2,22,23].
Strong inter-correlations emerged among ∑SCCPs, ∑MCCPs, and ∑LCCPs across both regions (Table S6), indicating potential shared sources and environmental behaviors among these structural analogs. The most robust relationships occurred between ∑SCCPs and ∑MCCPs in South China (Spearman Coefficient = 0.717, p < 0.001), and ∑MCCPs and ∑LCCPs in both South China (Spearman Coefficient = 0.726) and the Midwest U.S. (Spearman Coefficient = 0.832) (all p < 0.001). Weaker but statistically significant correlations were found for ∑SCCPs-LCCPs pairs in both locations, along with ∑SCCPs-MCCPs in the Midwest U.S. These observed correlation patterns align with current industrial practices where commercial CP formulations typically contain overlapping mixtures of SCCP, MCCP, and LCCP components with varying carbon chain lengths [32]. Furthermore, environmental transformation processes, including microbial degradation, oxidative reactions, combustion, and photolytic breakdown, could induce carbon chain shortening in higher molecular weight CPs, potentially generating SCCPs as degradation byproducts [7,33,34]. This degradation pathway might contribute to the observed strong correlations, particularly in environmental matrices like dust that accumulate CPs from both direct emissions and transformation.

3.2. Homologue Profiles of CPs in House Dust

The homologue distribution patterns of SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs showed remarkable consistency between South China and Midwestern U.S. house dust samples (Figure 1). Across both regions, C13 emerged as the predominant chain length for SCCPs, accounting for the highest proportion, with successively lower abundances observed for C12, C11, and C10 congeners. The carbon group profiles of SCCPs for house dust from South China and the Midwestern U.S. were similar to those found in dust samples from most previous studies [2,21,22,35]. Among MCCPs, C14-CP groups were the dominant carbon homologue profiles in the two study regions, followed by C15, C16, and C17. A similar homologous trend was also found in Belgian indoor dust [36], ambient PM2.5 from South China [24], and Norway handwipe samples [37]. The C14-CP groups have been used in most commercial MCCP products with more than 60 wt% in the U.S. [38]. Similarly, CP-52, a commercial mixture widely used in China, also uses the C14-CP congener group as the main component [39,40]. This explains the predominance of C14 in house dust from both regions. However, the proportions of C15 in house dust from the Midwest U.S. (21.7 ± 3.0%) were significantly higher than those from South China (19.1 ± 4.3%) (Figure S1). These differences imply region-specific influencing factors of CP carbon compositions.
Within LCCPs, C18-CP groups were the dominant carbon homologue profiles of LCCPs in most of the dust samples from South China and the Midwest U.S., followed by C19 and C20. However, the carbon chain length distribution of LCCPs exhibited more variability compared to SCCPs and MCCPs in the dust samples. C22 to C25 groups were the dominant profiles, accounting for more than 50% of the total LCCPs in three dust samples from China and two samples from the Midwest U.S. Remarkably, carbon chain lengths of C28 to C35-CP were also detected in most samples from South China and a few from the Midwest U.S. (Figure S2). Analytical data from technical mixtures reveal substantial compositional variations among commercial formulations [41]. For example, analysis revealed that C23-CP homolog groups showed the highest abundance in commercial CP-70 formulations [13], while C18-CP groups were the dominant carbon homologue profiles of LCCPs in the commercial mixture of CP-52 [15]. This observed variability in homolog distribution patterns likely stems from the coexistence of multiple industrial formulations containing distinct carbon chain profiles.
The distribution profiles of Cl groups were generally consistent between samples from the two regions (Figure 1). In SCCPs, Cl7 constituted the most abundant chlorination level, with Cl8 and Cl6 present as secondary components. MCCPs exhibited a distinct profile dominated by Cl8 homologues, while Cl7 and Cl9 showed lower abundance. For LCCPs, Cl9, Cl10, and Cl11 formed the primary homologues. Our chlorine homologues differed from those in indoor dust from South Africa, Australia, and Norway [2,21,22]. The results stem from various countries employing distinct CP mixes of commercial items. The chlorine homologues were directly related to the total chlorine degree in CPs. The degree of chlorination in dust from both Guangzhou and the Midwestern U.S. exhibits a consistent pattern: SCCPs > MCCPs > LCCPs (Table 1). This trend was similar to that observed in South China ambient PM2.5, Australia sewage sludge, and Yangtze River Delta wildlife [15,24,42].

3.3. Human Exposure via Dust Intake

We determined the EDIs and HQs of CPs via dust ingestion and derma absorption for both toddlers and adults (Table 2 and Figure 2). In South China, toddlers showed median total EDI values of 12.2 (SCCPs), 12.9 (MCCPs), and 3.83 ng/kg bw/day (LCCPs) under average exposure conditions, increasing to 23.9, 25.3, and 7.53 ng/kg bw/day, respectively, in high-exposure scenarios. Midwestern U.S. toddlers exhibited lower SCCP exposure (4.08 ng/kg bw/day) but comparable MCCP levels (11.6 ng/kg bw/day) under average conditions, with all values approximately doubling in high-exposure situations (Table 2). The EDIs of CPs for toddlers were significantly greater than those for adults, indicating that children are highly exposed to CPs due to increased dust intake rates, prolonged indoor time, and lower body weight. As for the two exposure pathways, dust ingestion dominated exposure pathways, contributing 76–96% of total EDIs under average conditions, with even greater predominance in high-exposure scenarios (Figure S3). These results indicated that ingestion was the dominant way for general populations to be exposed to CPs. However, the exposure to CPs through dermal permeation cannot be ignored.
As shown in Figure 2, the highest HQ of SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs for toddlers and adults in both regions were orders lower than 1. These results imply that indoor dust-related CP exposure cannot cause potential health risks for the general population of South China and the U.S. However, several limitations of our exposure assessments should be mentioned. Firstly, the predicted exposure only aggregates the three chemical types, disregarding the potential mixing effects arising from several isomers and their varying modes of hazardous action and thresholds. The “mixed” effect may lead to different exposure risks. Secondly, although dust ingestion via hand-to-mouth contact may represent a significant exposure pathway of CPs for toddlers [20], other exposure pathways (such as diet, inhalation) also made contributions. For adult populations, alternative exposure pathways may outweigh dust ingestion in significance. An assessment of CP exposure among the general population in Beijing showed that adults were exposed to SCCPs and MCCPs mainly via diet (accounting for 88% and 93% of the total exposure) [20]. Omitting these exposure pathways in our estimation may substantially underestimate the actual risk. Thirdly, although we considered the bioaccessibility of CPs entering the human body via dust ingestion in our assessment, these values were derived from an in vitro study and may be influenced by numerous other factors [43].

4. Conclusions

We systematically characterized the concentration and profiles of SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs in residential dust samples from China and the United States. Our findings revealed MCCPs as the dominant congener class in both regions, with LCCPs demonstrating comparable or even higher abundance than SCCPs in South China samples. This pattern highlights the widespread presence of LCCPs in indoor environments and underscores their significance in exposure assessments. We observed consistent homologue distribution patterns between the two geographically distinct regions. We also identified the CP class known as vSCCPs in a few samples from both regions, while very long-chain LCCPs with a carbon chain length up to 35 were also frequently detected. Although our data indicate that exposure to CPs via dust ingestion and dermal absorption is relatively low in abundance, due to the complexity of human exposure pathways, a better elucidation of the exposure risks and relative contribution to CPs through different pathways across multiple environmental matrices (e.g., water, air, food) is needed in future investigations. Furthermore, integrating these data with internal exposure levels measured in human biological samples is also essential for accurate risk evaluation of CP exposure.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics13060428/s1, Table S1: Instrument methods, Information of sampled dwellings and indoor temperature and humidity data during sampling; Table S2: Quantification and qualification ions of SCCPs and MCCPs; Table S3: Quantification and qualification ions of LCCPs; Table S4: Parameters used for the estimation of daily intake of CPs; Table S5: Concentration of CPs in indoor dust from different regions worldwide; Table S6: Spearman correlation of SCCPs, MCCPs and LCCPs in house dust from South China and Midwestern U.S.; Figure S1: The mean relative abundance of carbon homologues of SCCPs and MCCPs in house dust from South China and Midwestern U.S.; Figure S2: The mean relative abundance of carbon homologues of LCCPs in house dust from South China and Midwestern U.S.; Figure S3: Contribution of estimated daily intakes via dermal exposure and ingestion of dust in toddlers and adults from South China and Midwestern U.S. under different exposure scenarios [44,45,46,47,48,49].

Author Contributions

S.W.: Writing—original draft preparation, Investigation; Q.K.: Investigation; W.S.: Methodology; Y.C.: Methodology; M.M.: Writing—reviewing and editing; Y.S.: Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft preparation; X.L.: Methodology, Writing—reviewing and editing, Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFC3706601), and the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2024B1515020050).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are included within the paper and Supplementary Material and are available from the corresponding authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

Shuyue Wang, Qiuyan Ke, Mehvish Mumtaz, Yumeng Shi, Xiaotu Liu declare no conflicts of interest. Wenen Sun and Yukun Chen are employees of SCIEX (China) Co., whose instrument was used in this study.

References

  1. Boer, J. (Ed.) Chlorinated Paraffins; The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; Volume 10, ISBN 978-3-642-10760-3. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brits, M.; De Boer, J.; Rohwer, E.R.; De Vos, J.; Weiss, J.M.; Brandsma, S.H. Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in South African Indoor Dust and Cat Hair. Chemosphere 2020, 238, 124643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wei, G.-L.; Liang, X.-L.; Li, D.-Q.; Zhuo, M.-N.; Zhang, S.-Y.; Huang, Q.-X.; Liao, Y.-S.; Xie, Z.-Y.; Guo, T.-L.; Yuan, Z.-J. Occurrence, Fate and Ecological Risk of Chlorinated Paraffins in Asia: A Review. Environ. Int. 2016, 92–93, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, L.-H.; Ma, W.-L.; Liu, L.-Y.; Huo, C.-Y.; Li, W.-L.; Gao, C.-J.; Li, H.-L.; Li, Y.-F.; Chan, H.M. Occurrence, Sources and Human Exposure Assessment of SCCPs in Indoor Dust of Northeast China. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 225, 232–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, H.; Lam, J.C.W.; Zhu, M.; Wang, F.; Zhou, W.; Du, B.; Zeng, L.; Zeng, E.Y. Combined Effects of Dust and Dietary Exposure of Occupational Workers and Local Residents to Short- and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in a Mega E-Waste Recycling Industrial Park in South China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 11510–11519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, X.; Wang, Y.; Gao, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yao, Z.; Jiang, G. Air–Seawater Gas Exchange and Dry Deposition of Chlorinated Paraffins in a Typical Inner Sea (Liaodong Bay), North China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 7729–7735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, J.; Cao, D.; Gao, W.; Lv, K.; Liang, Y.; Fu, J.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. The Atmospheric Transport and Pattern of Medium Chain Chlorinated Paraffins at Shergyla Mountain on the Tibetan Plateau of China. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 245, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, W.; Shen, M.; Lam, J.C.W.; Zhu, M.; Liu, L.; Chen, H.; Du, B.; Zeng, L.; Zeng, E.Y. Size-Dependent Distribution and Inhalation Exposure Characteristics of Particle-Bound Chlorinated Paraffins in Indoor Air in Guangzhou, China. Environ. Int. 2018, 121, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, T.; Wan, Y.; Gao, S.; Wang, B.; Hu, J. High-Throughput Determination and Characterization of Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Human Blood. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 3346–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xia, D.; Gao, L.; Zheng, M.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.; Tian, Q.; Huang, H.; Qiao, L. Human Exposure to Short- and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins via Mothers’ Milk in Chinese Urban Population. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 608–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, J.; Gao, W.; Liang, Y.; Fu, J.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Spatiotemporal Distribution and Alpine Behavior of Short Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Air at Shergyla Mountain and Lhasa on the Tibetan Plateau of China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 11136–11144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zeng, L.; Wang, T.; Wang, P.; Liu, Q.; Han, S.; Yuan, B.; Zhu, N.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Distribution and Trophic Transfer of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in an Aquatic Ecosystem Receiving Effluents from a Sewage Treatment Plant. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 5529–5535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, C.; Chang, H.; Wang, H.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, X.; He, Y.; Sun, F.; Wu, F. Spatial and Temporal Distributions of Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Sediment Cores from Nine Lakes in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 9462–9471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Stockholm Convention on persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Available online: http://chm.pops.int/TheConvention/Overview/TextoftheConvention/tabid/2232/Default.aspx (accessed on 6 April 2025).
  15. Du, X.; Yuan, B.; Zhou, Y.; Benskin, J.P.; Qiu, Y.; Yin, G.; Zhao, J. Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Wildlife from Paddy Fields in the Yangtze River Delta. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 1072–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Deng, H.; Taishi, Y.; Wang, G.; Kong, Y.; Zhang, R.; Zheng, X. Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (LCCPs) Exposure Induces Apoptosis in Primary Chicken Embryo Hepatocytes Through Oxidative Stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 290, 117566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dong, T.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, S.; Shang, H.; Fang, W.; Chen, D.; Fang, M. Human Indoor Exposome of Chemicals in Dust and Risk Prioritization Using EPA’s ToxCast Database. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 7045–7054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, X.; Peng, C.; Shi, Y.; Tan, H.; Tang, S.; Chen, D. Beyond Phthalate Diesters: Existence of Phthalate Monoesters in South China House Dust and Implications for Human Exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 11675–11683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, Q.; Wang, M.; Jia, J.; Hu, Y.; Wang, X.; Liao, C.; Jiang, G. Occurrence, Distribution, and Human Exposure of Several Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in Indoor Dust: A Nationwide Study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 11333–11343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, W.; Cao, D.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. External Exposure to Short- and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins for the General Population in Beijing, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. He, C.; Brandsma, S.H.; Jiang, H.; O’Brien, J.W.; Van Mourik, L.M.; Banks, A.P.; Wang, X.; Thai, P.K.; Mueller, J.F. Chlorinated Paraffins in Indoor Dust from Australia: Levels, Congener Patterns and Preliminary Assessment of Human Exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 682, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yuan, B.; Tay, J.H.; Padilla-Sánchez, J.A.; Papadopoulou, E.; Haug, L.S.; De Wit, C.A. Human Exposure to Chlorinated Paraffins via Inhalation and Dust Ingestion in a Norwegian Cohort. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 1145–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. McGrath, T.J.; Poma, G.; Hutinet, S.; Fujii, Y.; Dodson, R.E.; Johnson-Restrepo, B.; Muenhor, D.; Dervilly, G.; Cariou, R.; Covaci, A. An International Investigation of Chlorinated Paraffin Concentrations and Homologue Distributions in Indoor Dust. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 333, 121994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Huang, J.; Zhao, L.; Shi, Y.; Zeng, X.; Sun, W.; Zhao, X.; Liu, R.; Wu, Q.; Dong, G.; Chen, D.; et al. Characterization of Short-, Medium- and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Ambient PM2.5 from the Pearl River Delta, China. Environ. Int. 2023, 175, 107932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tan, H.; Yang, L.; Yu, Y.; Guan, Q.; Liu, X.; Li, L.; Chen, D. Co-Existence of Organophosphate Di- and Tri-Esters in House Dust from South China and Midwestern United States: Implications for Human Exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 4784–4793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Reth, M.; Zencak, Z.; Oehme, M. New Quantification Procedure for the Analysis of Chlorinated Paraffins Using Electron Capture Negative Ionization Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1081, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. UNEP Annual Evaluation Report, 1996; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 1997.
  28. Shi, Y.; Liu, X.; Xie, Q.; Pan, X.-F.; Mei, Z. Plastic Additives and Personal Care Products in South China House Dust and Exposure in Child-Mother Pairs. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 281, 116347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xie, Q.; Guan, Q.; Li, L.; Pan, X.; Ho, C.-L.; Liu, X.; Hou, S.; Chen, D. Exposure of Children and Mothers to Organophosphate Esters: Prediction by House Dust and Silicone Wristbands. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 282, 117011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bu, Q.; Wu, D.; Xia, J.; Wu, M.; Liu, X.; Cao, Z.; Yu, G. Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers and Novel Brominated Flame Retardants in Indoor Dust of Different Microenvironments in Beijing, China. Environ. Int. 2019, 122, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, C.; Chen, A.; Zhan, F.; Wania, F.; Zhang, S.; Li, L.; Liu, J. Global Historical Production, Use, In-Use Stocks, and Emissions of Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 7895–7904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xia, D.; Vaye, O.; Lu, R.; Sun, Y. Resolving Mass Fractions and Congener Group Patterns of C8−C17 Chlorinated Paraffins in Commercial Products: Associations with Source Characterization. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 769, 144701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Y.; Gao, W.; Jiang, G. Strengthening the Study on the Behavior and Transformation of Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in the Environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 10282–10283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xin, S.; Gao, W.; Cao, D.; Lv, K.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, C.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. The Thermal Transformation Mechanism of Chlorinated Paraffins: An Experimental and Density Functional Theory Study. J. Environ. Sci. 2019, 75, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wong, F.; Suzuki, G.; Michinaka, C.; Yuan, B.; Takigami, H.; De Wit, C.A. Dioxin-like Activities, Halogenated Flame Retardants, Organophosphate Esters and Chlorinated Paraffins in Dust from Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, Sweden and China. Chemosphere 2017, 168, 1248–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. McGrath, T.J.; Christia, C.; Poma, G.; Covaci, A. Seasonal Variation of Short-, Medium- and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffin Distribution in Belgian Indoor Dust. Environ. Int. 2022, 170, 107616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yuan, B.; Tay, J.H.; Papadopoulou, E.; Haug, L.S.; Padilla-Sánchez, J.A.; de Wit, C.A. Complex Mixtures of Chlorinated Paraffins Found in Hand Wipes of a Norwegian Cohort. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020, 7, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. US EPA, 2015; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/standard_review_risk_assessment_p-14-683-684_qualice_docket.pdf (accessed on 6 April 2025).
  39. Glüge, J.; Schinkel, L.; Hungerbühler, K.; Cariou, R.; Bogdal, C. Environmental Risks of Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (MCCPs): A Review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 6743–6760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Glüge, J.; Wang, Z.; Bogdal, C.; Scheringer, M.; Hungerbühler, K. Global Production, Use, and Emission Volumes of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins—A Minimum Scenario. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 573, 1132–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, T.; Gao, S.; Ben, Y.; Zhang, H.; Kang, Q.; Wan, Y. Screening of Chlorinated Paraffins and Unsaturated Analogues in Commercial Mixtures: Confirmation of Their Occurrences in the Atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 1862–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Brandsma, S.H.; van Mourik, L.; O’Brien, J.W.; Eaglesham, G.; Leonards, P.E.G.; de Boer, J.; Gallen, C.; Mueller, J.; Gaus, C.; Bogdal, C. Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (CPs) Dominate in Australian Sewage Sludge. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 3364–3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Du, X.; Zhou, Y.; Li, J.; Wu, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Yin, G.; Qiu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Yuan, G. Evaluating oral and inhalation bioaccessibility of indoor dust-borne short- and median-chain chlorinated paraffins using in vitro Tenax-assisted physiologically based method. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 402, 123449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abdallah, M.A.; Covaci, A. Organophosphate flame retardants in indoor dust from Egypt: Implications for human exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 4782–4789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ali, N.; Ali, L.; Mehdi, T.; Dirtu, A.C.; Al-Shammari, F.; Neels, H.; Covaci, A. Levels and profiles of organochlorines and flame retardants in car and house dust from Kuwait and Pakistan: Implication for human exposure via dust ingestion. Environ. Int. 2013, 55, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hilger, B.; Fromme, H.; Volkel, W.; Coelhan, M. Occurrence of chlorinated paraffins in house dust samples from Bavaria, Germany. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 175, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Shang, H.; Fan, X.; Kubwabo, C.; Rasmussen, P.E. Short-chain and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in Canadian house dust and nist srm 2585. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019, 26, 7453–7462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, Y.; Hu, J.; Lin, W.; Wang, N.; Li, C.; Luo, P.; Hashmi, M.Z.; Wang, W.; Su, X.; Chen, C.; et al. Health risk assessment of migrant workers’ exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls in air and dust in an e-waste recycling area in china: Indication for a new wealth gap in environmental rights. Environ. Int. 2016, 87, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Exposure Factors Handbook; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; EPA/600/R-09/052 F. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Mean relative abundance with standard deviation error bars of CP homologues in house dust samples from South China and Midwestern U.S.
Figure 1. Mean relative abundance with standard deviation error bars of CP homologues in house dust samples from South China and Midwestern U.S.
Toxics 13 00428 g001
Figure 2. The hazard quotient for toddlers and adults from South China and Midwestern U.S. exposure to SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs under average- and high-exposure scenarios.
Figure 2. The hazard quotient for toddlers and adults from South China and Midwestern U.S. exposure to SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs under average- and high-exposure scenarios.
Toxics 13 00428 g002
Table 1. Detection frequencies (DFs), total concentrations and chlorine content of SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs (µg/g) in house dust from South China and Midwestern U.S.
Table 1. Detection frequencies (DFs), total concentrations and chlorine content of SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs (µg/g) in house dust from South China and Midwestern U.S.
DF (%)Total Concentration (μg/g)Chlorine Content (%)
MinMedianMax
South ChinaSCCPs1005.5123.115861
MCCPs10011.836.219858
LCCPs1004.2232.814553
∑CPs 22.2100466
Midwestern U.S.SCCPs1003.279.3610760
MCCPs1009.1539.597.255
LCCPs1002.6815.449.550
∑CPs 15.182.9246
Table 2. Estimated daily intake (ng/kg bw/day) via dust ingestion and dermal absorption of SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs by toddlers and adults under average- and high-exposure scenarios.
Table 2. Estimated daily intake (ng/kg bw/day) via dust ingestion and dermal absorption of SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs by toddlers and adults under average- and high-exposure scenarios.
South ChinaMidwestern U.S.
SCCPsMCCPsLCCPsSCCPsMCCPsLCCPs
Adults
Averagemin0.180.250.030.090.170.02
median0.740.770.230.260.750.10
max4.984.240.953.001.840.31
Highmin0.370.540.060.200.370.04
median1.571.660.490.561.600.21
max10.79.072.086.433.940.66
Toddlers
Averagemin2.914.190.501.422.690.26
median12.212.93.834.0811.61.49
max83.370.716.846.728.64.79
Highmin5.718.230.972.795.280.51
median23.925.37.538.0122.82.92
max16313933.291.856.29.41
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, S.; Ke, Q.; Sun, W.; Chen, Y.; Mumtaz, M.; Shi, Y.; Liu, X. Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Indoor Dust from South China and the Midwestern United States. Toxics 2025, 13, 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13060428

AMA Style

Wang S, Ke Q, Sun W, Chen Y, Mumtaz M, Shi Y, Liu X. Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Indoor Dust from South China and the Midwestern United States. Toxics. 2025; 13(6):428. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13060428

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Shuyue, Qiuyan Ke, Wenwen Sun, Yukun Chen, Mehvish Mumtaz, Yumeng Shi, and Xiaotu Liu. 2025. "Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Indoor Dust from South China and the Midwestern United States" Toxics 13, no. 6: 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13060428

APA Style

Wang, S., Ke, Q., Sun, W., Chen, Y., Mumtaz, M., Shi, Y., & Liu, X. (2025). Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Indoor Dust from South China and the Midwestern United States. Toxics, 13(6), 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13060428

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop