Next Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress Response of Liver Cell Culture in Atlantic Salmon Challenged Under Two Antibiotics: Oxytetracycline and Florfenicol
Previous Article in Journal
Screening of Profitable Chrysanthemums for the Phytoremediation of Cadmium-Contaminated Soils
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Pollutant Accumulation in the Invasive Bivalve Perna viridis: Current Status in the Colombian Caribbean 2020–2023
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Correlation Analysis Between Physical–Chemical and Biological Conditions in the River and the Incidence of Diseases in the City of Piracicaba, Brazil

by
Alexander Ossanes de Souza
*,
Deoclecio Jardim Amorim
and
Ernani Pinto
*
Center of Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, Av. Centenário, 303—São Dimas, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba 13416-000, SP, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2025, 13(5), 359; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050359
Submission received: 10 March 2025 / Revised: 20 April 2025 / Accepted: 28 April 2025 / Published: 30 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alien Species in Aquatic Toxicology)

Abstract

:
The Piracicaba River basin, in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, covers approximately 12,400 km2 and plays a crucial economic role in São Paulo’s agribusiness corridor. However, it faces recurrent episodes of pollution, impacting water quality and public health, especially in urban areas exposed to contamination. Despite this, few studies have investigated the ecological and epidemiological consequences of this environmental degradation. Therefore, this study analyzed the correlation between physicochemical and biological variables of the Piracicaba River and the incidence of diseases in the city of Piracicaba between January 2019 and September 2024. Data on hospital admissions for respiratory, neurological, and liver symptoms were used, as well as environmental and water quality information, such as dissolved oxygen, turbidity, conductivity, and the presence of cyanobacteria, obtained from public databases. The results showed seasonal patterns and long-term trends, highlighting the health risks associated with the river’s pollution. Parameters such as phosphorus, pH, cyanobacteria concentration and climatic factors (temperature and humidity) showed an influence on the occurrence of respiratory, digestive, and neurological diseases. The study reinforces the need for continuous monitoring of water quality and public policies to mitigate impacts on the population’s health.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The Piracicaba River originates in the municipality of Americana, from the confluence of the Jaguari and Atibaia rivers, and its mouth is next to the Tietê River, in the municipality of Barra Bonita. The river basin (formed by the sub-basins Atibaia, Jaguari and Piracicaba) covers an area of approximately 12,400 km2 [1,2]. Although it plays a crucial economic role in the region, it has experienced recurrent contamination events with ecological and public health consequences. It is continuously monitored by the Environmental Company of the State of São Paulo (CETESB) and the Municipal Water and Sewage Services (SEMAE), revealing significant declines in water quality over the years, particularly within Piracicaba [1,2]. During low-flow periods, high levels of turbidity, organic carbon, and Escherichia coli, together with persistent hypoxia, have been reported [1,2]. These conditions are further exacerbated by sediment runoff, urban discharge, and agricultural inputs, leading to cumulative pollutant loads [1,3,4].
Recent events highlight the severity of this degradation. In December 2023, a cyanobacterial bloom (Microcystis sp.) caused the river Piracicaba to exhibit a greenish coloration, coinciding with elevated microcystin levels [2,5]. This was followed by a mass fish mortality event in January 2024, attributed to hypoxic conditions and toxin release [2,5]. One of the main ways in which humans are exposed to cyanotoxins is through the ingestion of contaminated drinking water or the consumption of aquatic products. The most common cyanotoxins include microcystins, which can affect the liver, and anatoxins and saxitoxins, which affect the central nervous system, among others. Some studies indicate that aquatic organisms can accumulate toxins in their tissues, which can lead to food poisoning [6,7]. In addition, these episodes highlight the risk associated with aerosolized cyanobacteria and allergenic molecules, among other parameters known to aggravate respiratory, neurological, and hepatic conditions [8,9]. The research by Cheng et al. [10] concluded that aerosols containing microcystin in water can be transferred to the air through a bubble bursting process. The researchers report that humans can come into contact with aerosols containing microcystin when performing recreational activities in the area [10]. In the study by Labohá et al. [11], the authors detected components of cyanobacterial blooms in ambient aerosols above the surface layer of freshwater bodies. Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) could be detected in the thoracic/respirable fraction (0.1–10 µm). The study made it possible to demonstrate that LPS derived from phytoplankton or cyanobacterial blooms induced releases of pro-inflammatory cytokines from human bronchial epithelial cells in vitro; in addition, both the extracellular and intracellular fractions of the water sample from a reservoir with cyanobacterial bloom were also able to induce pro-inflammatory responses in human bronchial epithelial cells, at dilutions close to the concentrations in the original water [11]. In the review article proposed by Vejerano et al. [12], the authors highlight the importance of studying harmful algal blooms (HABs) and further report that aerosolized toxins are vulnerable to atmospheric processing, and can degrade and produce byproducts with varying potencies in comparison. Comorbid factors, such as exposure to air pollutants due to increased commercial activities in ports, may represent a significant exposure pathway for a considerable portion of the global population [12].
River pollution often leads to an increase in cases of disease in the general population, as described by Shultana and Khan [13]. There has been an increase in cases of waterborne diseases. Among these diseases, we can highlight dermatitis and respiratory diseases [13]. In Katakwar’s [14] study, it is highlighted that river pollution has been one of the major environmental issues in the riverine villages of Narmada and the urban area of Hoshangabad. The analysis of pH, color, turbidity, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), hardness, total dissolved solids (TDS), chloride (Cl2), carbon dioxide (CO2), and chemical oxygen demand (COD) presents a variety of correlated diseases [14]. In the study by Kormoker et al. [15], 17 water quality parameters (electrical conductivity, pH, total suspended solids, temperature, F, Cl, SO42−, Cr, Ni, As, Cd, Hg, Cu, Pb, Fe, Mn, and Zn) of surface and deep waters of the Buriganga River were evaluated, and it was observed that the water is unsafe for residential and recreational uses. They observed, through analysis of main components and correlation, that water quality is controlled by pollution from the combustion of lubricating oils, fuel additives, vehicle exhaust gases, domestic wastewater, and inorganic fertilizers from agricultural fields. In addition, they observed that water conditions and the concentration of some chemical elements can cause adverse effects on human health [15].
The Piracicaba River’s recurring pollution events provide an opportunity to address this gap, making a correlation between pollution events and the increase in cases in the public health system. Mainly because it is an important water source and a recreational center, it attracts residents and tourists to places such as “Rua do Porto” [1,2]. Recreational activities during contamination episodes increase exposure to toxins and other contaminants, but the health impacts of transient populations remain undocumented, potentially underestimating the true burden of pollution-related health problems [9,10,11,12]. Since the Piracicaba River is an important source of water for the region, it is extremely important to study the correlation between the quality of the river’s water and the recurring diseases in the city. For this purpose, statistics are an excellent tool, which allows us to analyze the variables of the river’s water quality and climatic factors and associate them with the incidence of some diseases reported by the Unified Health System (SUS) [16].
Our study highlights the critical need for integrated approaches to mitigating the health impacts of waterborne pollution in the Piracicaba River. The river crosses urbanized zones and interacts directly with the population that resides in close proximity to the riverbanks or engages in activities that place them in frequent contact with the river environment, such as fishing, bathing, and recreation in areas like Rua do Porto and the municipal park near the waterfall. Despite our continuous monitoring of regular water quality parameters, such as pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), turbidity, and nitrogen, among others, there is still a lack of studies that correlate these parameters with cases of hospitalizations in the SUS (Unified Health System) [1,2,17,18,19]. Seasonal spikes in hospital admissions highlight the need for responsive health systems to manage increased patient loads during pollution [16]. Awareness campaigns and restrictions on recreational activities near the river during periods of high risk can protect vulnerable populations, as recommended by WHO guidelines [15].
We hypothesize that acute exposure to air (from contaminated aerosols) and water pollution significantly increases hospital admissions for respiratory, liver, and neurological diseases, among others, while long-term exposure contributes to chronic health problems. Our study assessed acute impacts by correlating pollution events with immediate increases in hospital admissions. We also assessed long-term effects by analyzing cumulative health impacts from January 2019 to September 2024, focusing on chronic trends linked to repeated exposure to pollutants. Finally, we inform a new policy and provide recommendations for monitoring actions and public health interventions to reduce exposure risks during periods of contamination.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This study was designed as a single-center, analytical ecological observational study, focusing on cases within the city of Piracicaba. Data were obtained from the largest public health database in Brazil, DATASUS, managed by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. DATASUS provides comprehensive health information through the Unified Health System’s Information Technology Department [16], making it a reliable source for public health analysis.
The study evaluated the rates of hospital admissions due to liver, digestive, and respiratory diseases, among others, analyzing variations between January 2019 to September 2024. For analysis, all conditions classified under liver, respiratory diseases, neurological diseases, or other diseases related to contact with cyanotoxins according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) were included. Respiratory diseases were chosen for this study due to the potential of aerosols to transport toxic compounds. Hospital admission data were extracted from Authorizations for Hospitalization (AIHs) containing ICD codes.
In addition to health data, information was collected from the Cantareira System, a series of reservoirs supplying water to the Piracicaba region and the Greater São Paulo area. The PCJ situation room was used to monitor the flow of the Piracicaba River [17]. Flow data, reported as cubic meters per second (m3/s), level flow (m), and precipitation (mm), were converted into monthly averages to align with the periods of hospital admissions data. In addition, data on temperature, wind speed, and relative humidity were obtained by the National Institute of Meteorology (INMET) and converted into monthly averages [18]. Data on pH, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, nitrogen, phosphorus, cyanobacteria, and chlorophyll were obtained from the website of the Municipal Water and Sewage Service (SEMAE) of the city of Piracicaba [2]. This synchronization facilitated a more direct comparison, focusing on short-term pollution exposure episodes.

2.2. Study Population and Setting

This study analyzed the population of Piracicaba, Brazil, admitted to hospitals or clinics with symptoms related to liver, respiratory, neurological, or other related diseases. The study imposed no restrictions concerning age, gender, or the type of healthcare facility (public or private) as long as the facility was registered with ANVISA. While transient populations, such as tourists, might have been included, it was not possible to differentiate or exclude these individuals from the dataset.
This retrospective, descriptive, and analytical study utilized secondary data available in DATASUS, the official database of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) [16]. The population studied included all cases reported between the defined periods (2019 to 2024) in Piracicaba. Exclusion criteria were cases reported outside the city of Piracicaba. Cases with incomplete data that could not be matched or verified in the SUS system.
This study adhered to the ethical norms of Resolution 466/12 [20]. There was no need for submission to a Research Ethics Committee or the application of an Informed Consent Term, as all data used were secondary, publicly available, and anonymized, with no identifiable information regarding individuals.

2.3. Data Sources and Collection

Health and environmental data for this study were sourced from publicly available databases and monitoring systems, ensuring alignment with the study objectives and defined timeframes. The following data sources and processes were utilized:

2.3.1. Health Data

Hospitalization data were obtained from the DATASUS database, specifically from the “Hospital Morbidity of the SUS by Place of Hospitalization” dataset, filtered for Piracicaba (Municipality Code: 353870). Admissions were categorized according to the following ICD-10 classifications, set out in Table S1.
Data were recorded by year and month of care, enabling temporal analysis aligned with the study’s defined periods from 2019 to 2024. Hospitalizations represent cases officially registered in the Unified Health System (SUS) for facilities located in Piracicaba.

2.3.2. Physicochemical and Biological Water Variables

Environmental data were obtained from two key sources:
PCJ Situation Room [17]: This system monitors the Cantareira System and associated reservoirs. Flow data for the Piracicaba River, reported in cubic meters per second (m3/s), flow (m), and precipitation (mm), were extracted and converted into monthly averages to align with hospitalization data, set out in Table S1.
SEMAE (Municipal Water and Sewage Service) [2]: Additional data on water quality in the source were obtained from bulletins made available by SEMAE.
INMET [18]: The data obtained from INMET made it possible to assess the climate conditions during this period through the bulletins made available, set out in Table S1.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.2.2) within the RStudio environment (version 2024.12.0 + 467) [21]. Initially, the data were organized into two matrices: X (health-related variables) and Y (physicochemical and biological water variables). The associations between variables were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, a non-parametric measure suitable for capturing monotonic relationships. The statistical significance of the correlations was evaluated through bootstrap resampling with 10,000 iterations, allowing for the construction of 95% confidence intervals. Correlations whose confidence intervals included zero were considered non-significant.
To explore the global relationship between the two matrices, canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was employed to identify patterns of association between the variable sets [22]. Temporal patterns in disease data were examined using hierarchical cluster analysis, based on the Spearman’s correlation matrix derived from the bootstrap simulations. The clustering was performed using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA), and the cluster validity was assessed via the cophenetic correlation coefficient to ensure that the hierarchical structure accurately reflected the original data. These analyses were conducted using the “vegan” package [23].
Following the correlation analyses, the variables in matrix Y were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction (k = 16). PCA was performed based on the correlation matrix using the “FactoMineR” package [24]. To determine the optimal number of principal components to retain, parallel analysis was conducted using the “psych” package [25]. The retained principal components (PCs) were subsequently included as covariates in generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), with model parameters estimated via maximum likelihood.
GLMMs were fitted using the “glmmTMB” package [26], adopting a negative binomial distribution to account for overdispersion observed in the disease count data, which exhibited greater variability than expected under a standard Poisson model [27]. In this context, disease counts were modeled considering the retained PCs as fixed effects and including random effects for year and season nested within year to capture longitudinal dependencies. Alternative nested models, incorporating different combinations of covariates in the linear predictor, were compared using likelihood ratio tests.
The general form of the model used to analyze disease counts is represented by the following equation:
log ( μ i j k ) = β 0 + p = 1 k β p P C p + b i + b j ( i )
where µ i j k is the expected mean of disease counts for the k-th observation in the j-th season within the i-th year; β 0 is the intercept; β p represents the p-th principal component used as a covariate; b i N ( 0 , σ y e a r 2 ) is the random effect for the i-th year; and b j ( i ) N ( 0 , σ s e a s o n 2 ) is the random effect for the j-th season nested within the i-th year. The logarithmic link function (log) ensures that the predicted mean ( µ i j k ) is positive and appropriate for count data. The model’s variance is adjusted using a dispersion parameter specific to the negative binomial distribution to address overdispersion.

3. Results

This section will present data obtained from correlation analysis and longitudinal modeling of the incidence of diseases associated with the physicochemical and biological variables of the water in the Piracicaba River. The results are organized in such a way as to highlight the main relationships between environmental variables (such as pH, temperature, humidity, and the concentration of cyanobacteria, among others) and the occurrence of respiratory, digestive system, nervous system, and other diseases. Firstly, the data obtained will be presented in the form of a minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation (SD), and range for each variable, as shown in Table 1 and the Supplementary Material Excel document.
In our study, we did not observe any variation in the incidence of experimental diseases or changes in physicochemical evaluations during the period that included the COVID-19 pandemic.

3.1. Correlation Analysis Between a Disease and Physicochemical and Biological Water Variables

The interpretation of the data presented in Figure 1 provides us with support for a deeper understanding of the interactions between human health and the environmental conditions of the Piracicaba River, contributing to the formulation of effective prevention and mitigation strategies. In general, a positive correlation is observed between the diseases, except in the case of DDS_DGPI and DDS_OLV (Figure 1A), which are not related to the others.
In Figure 1B, the correlations between the physicochemical and biological variables show positive and negative patterns; for example, cyanobacteria (Cyan) are negatively correlated with the other variables while the concentration of nitrate (N_NO3) in the water has a negative relationship with turbidity and average temperature (AT). The correlation values presented in Figure 1A,B, along with their respective confidence intervals generated through bootstrap simulation, can be found in Tables S2 and S3.
The canonical correlation analysis identified two significant relationships between the diseases and the physicochemical and biological characteristics of the Piracicaba River (Table 2). The first canonical pair (correlation = 0.90; p = 0.00037; Figure S1) indicates that high concentrations of phosphate (P_PO4_3) and lower concentrations of soluble phosphorus (PS) are strongly associated with an increase in the incidence of diseases such as SDB and ODSST. The second canonical pair (correlation = 0.83; p = 0.036; Figure S1) reveals that high levels of inorganic nitrogen (Ni) and higher pH are correlated with an increased incidence of diseases such as DSST and ODSST, while lower concentrations of chlorophyll (Chl) indicate waters with lower biological productivity.
Overall, the results indicate a strong relationship between the water quality of the Piracicaba River and the occurrence of diseases, highlighting the role of pollution by nutrients, heavy metals, and physicochemical variations in the spread of health problems. This information is essential for directing environmental policies and monitoring strategies, aiming at improving water quality and reducing impacts on public health. Therefore, the relationship between the incidence of diseases over the years was evaluated to verify the repetition patterns, based on a heatmap. In Figure 2, the colors indicate the incidence levels, with darker shades of purple representing high incidence and shades of orange indicating low incidence.
The colors represent standardized incidence values: yellow indicates values below the average, purple above the average, and white close to the average. The dendrograms at the top and left show the clustering of diseases and years, respectively, based on the similarity of their incidence patterns, calculated by Spearman’s correlation and grouped by the UPGMA method, with cophenetic coefficients of 0.81 (diseases) and 0.91 (years) indicating robust clusters. These clusters highlight diseases with similar behaviors over time and periods with similar incidence patterns.
The heatmap analysis reveals distinct incidence patterns over time. Two well-defined clusters are formed for diseases and two clusters for years, indicating similar epidemiological behaviors within each group. Some diseases show incidence peaks concentrated in specific periods, suggesting possible outbreaks or seasonal variations. In addition, certain years or time intervals cluster together, which may reflect the influence of environmental factors, social factors, or external events that impacted the incidence of multiple diseases simultaneously (Figure 2).
It is worth noting that the diseases DDS_OLV and DDS_OIID, as well as some months of 2020, present atypical incidence patterns in relation to the other diseases and periods analyzed, which suggests specific epidemiological dynamics for these cases (Figure 2). These patterns provide relevant insights for understanding the temporal dynamics of diseases, assisting in the planning of public health surveillance and control actions, focusing on periods and diseases of greatest risk.

3.2. Principal Component Analysis of the Physicochemical and Biological Variables of the Piracicaba River

To assess the influence of the physicochemical and biological variables of the Piracicaba River, a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed. The variables considered included water parameters (pH, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, ammonia, nitrate, total inorganic nitrogen, total phosphorus, soluble phosphorus, phosphate, cyanobacterial concentration, and chlorophyll), river parameters (discharge, flow, and precipitation), and climate parameters (temperature and humidity). The selection of principal components was based on parallel analysis (Figure S2), resulting in the retention of the first four components, which together explained 74.3% of the total data variability (Figure 3).
The first principal component (PC1), responsible for 36.4% of the variance, showed correlation with variables related to the river (mean level, mean flow, and precipitation), water parameters (ammonia and inorganic nitrogen), and climate parameters (humidity). The second principal component (PC2), which explained 16.7% of the variability, was associated with water variables, notably phosphate, soluble phosphorus, and pH. The third principal component (PC3), with 11.5% of the variance, was related to river variables (precipitation), water variables (nitrate, inorganic nitrogen, cyanobacteria concentration, and chlorophyll), and climate variables (temperature). Finally, the fourth principal component (PC4), which represented 9.7% of the total variability, was correlated with water variables, specifically nitrate, chlorophyll, and cyanobacteria concentration (Figure S3). These retained PCs were used in the GLMMs to infer the relationships between environmental variables and disease incidence in the city of Piracicaba (Section 3.3, Section 3.4, and Section 3.5).

3.3. Diseases of the Respiratory System

Respiratory diseases (DRS, DRS_A, DRS_ODNPS, and DRS_ODRS) presented distinct patterns of influence of environmental and temporal factors on the disease incidence in the city of Piracicaba. The results obtained through GLMM, adjusted with negative binomial distribution, are presented in Table 3. It highlights both the fixed effects, represented by physicochemical and biological variables of the water synthesized in principal components (PCs), and the random effects, attributed to the variability associated with the season and the year alone.
DRS, which encompasses all respiratory diseases, did not show a significant influence of the environmental parameters analyzed. However, a significant influence was observed from the random effects of year/season and year alone, suggesting the presence of relevant temporal variations. For DRS_A, there was a statistically significant association with PC2 (estimate = −0.1378; p = 0.0031), indicating that the increase in phosphate, soluble phosphorus, and pH levels is related to a reduction in the incidence of the disease.
The incidence of DRS_ODNPS was significantly influenced by PC1 (estimate = −0.0765; p = 0.0032), which aggregates variables related to the river’s hydrological regime (such as mean level, mean flow, and precipitation), water quality (nitrate and inorganic nitrogen), and climatic conditions (relative humidity). These results suggest that higher values of these parameters are associated with a decrease in the occurrence of the disease. On the other hand, for DRS_ODRS, no statistically significant associations were detected with the environmental or temporal factors analyzed, which indicates that its incidence may be related to other determinants not covered in this study.
The significant random effects observed for the diseases DRS and DRS_ODNPS are presented in Figure 4. For DRS, the nested random effect of the season within year was more evident for autumn, indicating a relevant impact on the incidence of the disease, possibly associated with seasonal environmental conditions. In addition, the year 2023 showed a significant positive effect, suggesting an increase in the incidence of DRS, possibly related to extreme environmental events. For DRS_ODNPS, the seasonal variation was less pronounced, with most of the effects not being significant, except for winter 2021 (Winter: 2021), which showed a significant negative effect. The year 2021 also showed a significant negative effect. The other years and seasons showed effects close to zero, suggesting stability in the incidence of DRS_ODNPS over time, with less interannual and seasonal variation compared to DRS.

3.4. Diseases of the Digestive System

Digestive system diseases (DDS, DDS_DGPI, and DDS_ODESD) are influenced by the season within the year and by the year in isolation, as shown in Table 4. On the other hand, diseases such as DDS_ODDS, DDS_OLV and DDS_OIID are not related to seasonal changes. In general, when considering all diseases related to the digestive system together (DDS), no influence of the parameters analyzed in this research is observed. However, when analyzing each digestive system disease separately, it is possible to identify correlations with the variables studied.
The influence of the physicochemical and biological variables of the Piracicaba River was analyzed in relation to the DDS_ODDS, DDS_DGPI, and DDS_ODESD diseases. For the disease DDS_ODDS, PC2 (estimate = −0.0723; p = 0.0002) suggests that the increase in the concentrations of phosphate, soluble phosphorus, and pH is associated with a reduction in the incidence of the disease. On the other hand, for DDS_ODESD, the same PC2 (estimate = 0.2099; p = 0.0022) indicated that the increase in these parameters is related to an increase in the incidence of the disease. In addition, PC3 (estimate = 0.1349; p = 0.0089) showed that factors such as precipitation, nitrate, inorganic nitrogen, concentration of cyanobacteria, chlorophyll, and temperature are associated with an increase in the incidence of DDS_ODESD. Figure 5 demonstrates the influence of different seasons within the same year and years separately on the average number of cases of DDS, DDS_DGPI, and DDS_ODESD. Different seasons of the year have a greater influence on DDS, specifically from 2020 to 2022. The year 2023 stands out in the scenario of digestive system diseases, suggesting a higher incidence of these diseases, potentially associated with favorable environmental conditions, such as rising temperatures or changes in the water quality of the Piracicaba River. On the other hand, years such as 2020 and 2021 showed significant negative effects, indicating a lower incidence of diseases, which may be associated with events of less environmental stress or greater stability in the parameters of the physicochemical and biological variables of the Piracicaba River.

3.5. Diseases of the Nervous System and Other Diseases

In general, diseases of the nervous system and other diseases are associated with the physicochemical and biological variables of the Piracicaba River and also present seasonal patterns, as shown in Table 5. However, some diseases, such as DNS, DNS_ODNS, DSST, ODSST, and ODEA, are not influenced by the fixed factors represented by the PCs. In addition, the incidence of these diseases varies according to specific years.
The variables PC1 (estimate = −0.0407; p = 0.0122) and PC2 (estimate = −0.0590; p = 0.0460) showed a negative relationship with the incidence of SSTI, indicating that the increase in the variables associated with these components may be related to the reduction in the occurrence of this disease. On the other hand, PC3 showed a positive relationship with IPSOCEC (estimate = 0.0189; p = 0.0305) and DEA (estimate = 0.1192; p = 0.0451) diseases, suggesting that the increase in the variables included in this component may be associated with an increase in the occurrence of these diseases. PC4 (estimate = −0.0198; p = 0.0361), which includes variables such as nitrate, chlorophyll, and cyanobacteria concentration, showed a negative effect on the incidence of IPSOCEC.
The random effects estimated by the GLMM models indicated significant variations in the incidence of diseases over the years (Figure 6). For diseases of the nervous system, such as DNS, a significant negative effect was observed in 2020 and 2021 and a positive effect in 2022, suggesting the influence of environmental factors or changes in exposure conditions between these years.
Similar trends were observed for DSST and ODSST, with significant positive effects in 2023 and 2022, respectively, while ODSST showed a negative effect in 2020. These results point to a possible trend of increasing incidence of these diseases in more recent years, possibly related to environmental changes, such as fluctuations in water quality or climate change.
A similar pattern of temporal variation was observed for other diseases. In the case of DEA, the year 2019 showed a significant positive effect, contrasting with the negative effect observed in 2020. For ODEA, the year 2023 stood out with a significant positive effect, indicating an increase in the occurrence of the disease in that period.

4. Discussion

Environmental pollution has worsened over the years, possibly due to improper disposal of industrial waste, agricultural waste, improper discharge of effluents, and emerging compounds, among others. As a result, water bodies are gradually deteriorating, affecting the local population and causing various respiratory and digestive diseases, among others. As demonstrated in the study by Hanif et al. [28], water pollution in the Kapotaksha River impacts the health of the population: for example, 4% are affected by diarrhea, 5% are affected by dysentery, 25% of people suffer from respiratory diseases, and 4% suffer from asthma [28].
We observed variations in the values found for the physicochemical and biological parameters that reflect the deterioration of water quality. Comparing these values with the limits of the National Environmental Council (CONAMA), Resolution 357/2005, and the Ministry of Health, Ordinance GM/MS No. 888/2021, for fresh water intended for human consumption, we noticed that the concentration of cyanobacteria and chlorophyll are above the reference value, and in addition, we observed that dissolved oxygen presents values below the expected (Table S4) [29,30]. In this context, based on statistical analysis, we were able to predict which environmental or water quality patterns may affect the population of Piracicaba (Table 1). These data and results obtained enable planning for the SUS, where changes in this parameter may indicate a greater demand for the health system in the region. Therefore, the cross-referencing and correlation of these data allow us to have a broader view of the influence of the Piracicaba River on the local population, thus being a crucial factor for the city’s annual health planning.

4.1. Diseases of the Respiratory System

Respiratory system diseases (DRS and DRS_ODNPS) are influenced by the seasons/year, as shown in Table 3. These diseases are affected by meteorological variables, airborne allergens, and air pollution. Therefore, climatic factors (temperature, humidity, wind speed, and storms, among others) can affect the components of the atmosphere through their interaction with the airways, inducing clinical respiratory symptoms. In addition, contamination by respiratory viruses tends to occur during the colder seasons, especially when low temperatures are accompanied by dry conditions. The disease called DRS_ODRS is not related to the change in season/year because these types of diseases are classified as post-surgical diseases, syndromes, disorders, and respiratory failures, among others, and are thus affected by other external factors [16,31,32].
DRS, in general, when all diseases related to the respiratory system are added together, are not influenced by the parameters analyzed in this research. However, as the diseases of the respiratory system are observed separately, a correlation with the variables studied can be found.
DRS_A is negatively influenced by PC2. When pH conditions are optimal and in accordance with physiological conditions, we observe a decrease in this disease. However, any disturbance causing changes in the pH of the water can irritate the nasal mucous membranes when inhaled [33,34,35]. The concentration of phosphorus in water can increase serum concentrations in humans, resulting in a decrease in the incidence of asthma cases, according to a study by Changhai et al. [36]. The lack of micronutrients, such as phosphorus, for example, is associated with a higher incidence of atopic diseases, according to a review by Peroni et al. [37].
The DRS_ODNPS has a negative influence on PC1. The conditions of the river, together with changes in the climate, can directly influence some lung diseases due to variations in relative humidity, reducing, for example, calcification of the nasal cavities or ulceration. Humidity exerts a primary control on fire occurrence and, therefore, on respiratory disease since particulate matter emissions decrease [33,34,35,38,39]. The presence of nitrogen may aid in lung cell metabolism, acid-base balance, and human lung ecology. Thus, we can observe from the data obtained that this chemical element and its compounds can be incorporated into amides, amino acids, proteins, nucleic acids, vitamins, etc., or as energy producers [40].
The increase in the incidence of DRS in 2023 may be associated with the bloom event that occurred in the region during this period where a degradation in water quality and an increase in the concentration of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins were observed, which resulted in fish mortality [2,5].

4.2. Diseases of the Digestive System

Digestive system diseases (DDS, DDS_DGPI, and DDS_ODESD) are influenced by the seasons/year, as shown in Table 4, due to changes in eating habits, physical activities, behavior, and the immune system, among others [41,42]. In the systematic study by Fares [41], the author observes that seasonal peaks in digestive system diseases, such as peptic ulcers, are more prominent in the colder months, while the peak incidence rate of Crohn’s disease in most countries was found during the spring and summer seasons. The seasonal trend in the onset of acute pancreatitis shows a summer peak in some countries.
On the other hand, the diseases called DDS_ODDS, DDS_OLV, and DDS_OIID were not related to the change in season/year.
DDS in general, when all diseases related to the digestive system are added together, are not influenced by the parameters analyzed in this research. However, as diseases of the digestive system are observed separately, a correlation with the variables studied can be found.
DDS_ODESD has a positive influence on PC2. Excess nutrients, especially phosphorus, cause a greater proliferation of pathogenic organisms that release toxins into the water. As a result, the efficiency of the processes used in water treatment plants (WTP) may be compromised, thus increasing the incidence of diseases related to the digestive system [34,35,43]. Cyanotoxins, for example, are a diverse group of hepato-, neuro-, cyto-, and dermatotoxins, including microcystins and nodularins, which inhibit serine/threonine protein phosphatases and lead to hepatic system, neurological, immunological, and reproductive damage that can be potentially fatal. Their physiological effects vary between organisms and depend on the route of exposure, with effects ranging from skin irritation and nausea to tissue necrosis and death. An example of cyanotoxins that affect the digestive system are anabaenapeptins [40]. In addition, the release of potentially toxic chemical elements into water suffering from hypoxia can be aggravated by increasing the ingestion and inhalation of these chemical elements. pH influences the acidity of the digestive system, which can cause irritation and changes in its functioning [34,35,44]. DDS_ODDS, on the other hand, has a negative influence on PC2. This observed evidence may be correlated with the types of diseases included in this classification, which are diseases related to food intolerance, intestinal malformation, and post-surgical syndromes, among others. Therefore, pH directly influences these diseases by causing physiological changes that improve phosphorus absorption [45]. With the increase of this chemical element in the body, we can observe that there may be a decrease in several diseases, including chronic renal failure, malabsorption of the small intestine, and vitamin D-deficient osteomalacia [Peacock].
DDS_DGPI, on the other hand, has a positive influence on PC3. The presence of nitrates and nitrites in water can trigger gastritis, ulcers, and diarrhea, among others. This factor is influenced by precipitation and temperature, together with nitrogen, which can trigger flowering phenomena, increasing the incidence of the disease [39,44].
The diseases DDS_OLV and DDS_OIID do not show any correlation with the variables studied, and the occurrence of these diseases is correlated with other parameters, which were not the focus of this research. In order to find diseases related to the liver and other intestinal infections, the population of Piracicaba should have had prolonged contact with river water, so no effect of the variables on these diseases was observed.

4.3. Diseases of the Nervous System and Other Diseases

Diseases of the nervous system vary with seasonality, as shown in Table 5, due to changes in several environmental factors, with an increase in diseases related to acute stroke, meningitis, encephalitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and demyelinating disease [46]. For example, changes in seasons, which vary between the optimal temperature, can aggravate deaths resulting from the nervous system [47]. Skin diseases are also aggravated by rising temperatures, including atopic dermatitis, measles and eczema, infectious skin diseases, and skin cancer [48,49]. The same is observed for other diseases where climatic factors and pollution aggravate the incidence of these diseases [50,51].
SSTI has a negative correlation with PC1 and PC2. The river conditions and relative humidity help maintain healthy skin. Thermal and humid comfort can prevent dry skin, preventing possible related diseases, such as itching, pruritus, and cracks [52,53]. In addition to humidity, the ideal pH maintains the skin microbiota, preventing possible infectious processes or skin degradation [53].
IPSOCEC and DEA have a positive influence on PC3. Excess nutrients can cause algal blooms, which, in contact with toxins present in the water from recreational activities in bodies of water, can result in itching, allergic reactions, irritation of the eyes and mucous membranes, and diarrhea, among others [54,55]. The proliferation of pathogenic organisms that release toxins into water, thus compromising the efficiency of the processes used in water treatment plants (WTPs), increases the incidence of diseases [34,35,43]. Cyanotoxins, for example, are a diverse group of hepato-, neuro-, and cytotoxic chemicals. Their physiological effects vary among organisms and depend on the route of exposure, with effects ranging from nausea, tissue necrosis, and death [44]. Furthermore, the release of potentially toxic chemicals into the water suffering from hypoxia can be aggravated by increasing the ingestion and inhalation of these chemicals. The pH influence on acidity or alkalinity can compromise proper physiological functioning [34,35,43].

4.4. Future Directions

Our studies were based on the hypothesis that aerosols formed along the Piracicaba River influence the incidence of diseases in the population of Piracicaba. However, throughout the study and after the elaboration of this research, there is room for studying the effects of river water on the incidence of other diseases related to the aquatic environment, viruses, bacteria, and other organisms. In addition, other factors can be added as variations to scientific studies, such as city expansion, concentration of green areas, and agricultural advances, among others.

5. Conclusions

This study highlights the significant impact of environmental factors, particularly variations in river quality and climate, on public health outcomes in urban settings. When analyzing hospital admission rates in Piracicaba over the period from 2019 to 2024, clear seasonal patterns emerged. Changes in parameters such as phosphate and soluble phosphorus concentration, pH, river level and flow, and air humidity influence the incidence of diseases of the respiratory system. Diseases of the digestive system are influenced by the parameters of phosphate and soluble phosphorus concentration, pH, nitrate and inorganic nitrogen concentration, cyanobacteria concentration, chlorophyll, and temperature. Finally, skin and eye diseases show variation in their incidence when there is a variation in phosphate and soluble phosphorus concentration, pH, nitrate and inorganic nitrogen concentration, cyanobacteria concentration, chlorophyll, and temperature. The findings highlight:
(i)
Seasonal health risks: High hospital admissions during contamination peaks highlight the vulnerability of populations living near or interacting with polluted water sources.
(ii)
Implications for public health policy: Enhanced environmental monitoring and timely public health warnings are essential to mitigate risks during periods of high contamination. Enhanced health system preparedness is critical to effectively address seasonal spikes in hospital admissions.
(iii)
Studies that correlate physicochemical and biological parameters are needed to understand disease incidence as well as their effects on humans.
Despite its limitations, this study provides valuable insights into the intersection of environmental and health systems. Future research should aim to include direct exposure measurements, new longitudinal analyses to deepen our understanding of acute and chronic impacts, and evidence-based strategies to protect vulnerable populations and promote sustainable management of urban rivers.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics13050359/s1, Figure S1: Canonical scores between the sets of disease-related variables (X) and physicochemical and biological water parameters (Y) derived from canonical correlation analysis (CCA). (A) First canonical pair (Can 1), showing a strong correlation between the canonical variates (r = 0.90, p = 0.00037). (B) Second canonical pair (Can 2), also presenting a strong canonical correlation (r = 0.83, p = 0.036). Linear regression lines (in magenta) illustrate the association between the canonical scores. Figure S2: Parallel analysis of the principal component analysis (PCA) of the physicochemical and biological variables. Continuous line corresponds to PC actual data (blue), and dashed line (red) corresponds to PC resampled data; Figure S3: Contributions of variables (%) to (A) PC1, (B) PC2, (C) PC3, and (D) PC4. The analyzed variables include water parameters (pH, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, N-NH₃, N-NO₃, total inorganic nitrogen, total phosphorus, soluble phosphorus, P-PO43−, cyanobacteria concentration, and chlorophyll), river parameters (flow rate, discharge, and precipitation), and climate parameters (temperature and humidity). Table S1: Acronyms of the diseases and parameters studied. Table S2. Spearman’s correlation matrix for diseases. Table S3: Spearman’s correlation matrix for physicochemical and biological water variables. Table S4: Freshwater quality standards according to CONAMA and the Brazilian Ministry of Health.

Author Contributions

A.O.d.S.: analyzed and interpreted the data, analyzed tools and data, and wrote the paper; D.J.A.: analyzed and interpreted statistical data, applied statistical analysis tools and data; E.P.: analyzed and interpreted the data and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the São Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP), grant numbers 2021/10573-4, 2023/10220-0, 2023/11082-0, 2024/17390-0, the University of São Paulo Foundation (FUSP), grant number 1979, and the University of São Paulo USPSusten Program of the Superintendence of Environmental Management (Supplementary Notice DOE 13 July 2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon request (Excel sheets with data and official documents).

Acknowledgments

The graphical abstract was created in BioRender.com. The authors acknowledge DATASUS, SEMAE, INMET, and PCJ for its diligent work in providing the access to the databases.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
DRSDiseases of the Respiratory System
DRS_ADiseases of the Respiratory System_Asthma
DRS_ODNPSDiseases of the Respiratory System-
Other Diseases of the Nose and Paranasal Sinuses
DRS_ODRSDiseases Of The Respiratory System_
Other Diseases Of The Respiratory System
DDSDiseases of the Digestive System
DDS_ODDSDiseases of the Digestive System_
Other Diseases of the Digestive System
DDS_DGPIDiseases of the Digestive System_
Diarrhea and Gastroenteritis of Presumed Infectious Origin
DDS_OLVDiseases of the Digestive System_
Other Liver Diseases
DDS_OIIDDiseases of the Digestive System_
Other Infectious Intestinal Diseases
DDS_ODESDDiseases of the Digestive System_
Other Diseases of the Esophagus, Stomach and Duodenum
DNSDiseases of the Nervous System
DNS_ODNSDiseases of the Nervous System_
Other Diseases of the Nervous System
DSSTDiseases of the Skin And Subcutaneous Tissue
ODSSTOther Diseases of the Skin And Subcutaneous Tissue
SSTISkin and Subcutaneous Tissue Infections
IPSOCECInjuries, Poisoning and Some Other Consequences of External Causes
DEADiseases of the Eye and Adnexa
ODEAOther Diseases of the Eye and Adnexa
AFAverage Flow (m3/s)
LFAverage Level Flow (m)
PAverage Precipitation (mm)
ATAverage Temperature (°C)
WWind, Average Speed (m/s)
AHAverage Relative Air Humidity (%)
pHpH
DODissolved Oxygen (mg/L O2)
NTUTurbidity (UNT)
NHN_NH_3 (mg/L)
NON_NO_3 (mg/L)
NNtotal Inorganic (mg/L)
PHPtotal (mg/L)
PSPsoluble (mg/L)
PO_PO4_3 (mg/L)
CynCyanobacteria (n° cel/mL)
ChlChlorophyll (mg/L)
CETESBEnvironmental Company of the State of São Paulo
SEMAEMunicipal Water and Sewage Services
BODBiochemical Oxygen Demand
TDSTotal Dissolved Solids
LPSLipopolysaccharides
SUSUnified Health System
DATASUSUnified Health System’s Information Technology Department
INMETNational Institute of Meteorology
PCJComitês das Bacias Hidrográficas dos Rios Piracicaba, Capivari e Jundiaí e Comitê da Bacia Hidrográfica dos Rios Piracicaba e Jaguari.
ICD-10International Classification of Diseases
CCAcanonical correlation analysis
UPGMAUnweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean
PCAPrincipal Component Analysis
PCPrincipal Components

References

  1. CETESB (São Paulo) Qualidade das Águas Interiores no Estado de São Paulo 2023. Available online: https://cetesb.sp.gov.br/aguas-interiores/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2024/11/RAI-2023-Relatorio-de-Qualidade-de-Aguas-Interiores-2023.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  2. Serviço Municipal de Água e Esgoto (SEMAE) de Piracicaba. Qualidade da Água—Relatórios Mensais e Anual Decreto 5.440. Available online: https://www.semaepiracicaba.sp.gov.br/?p=Y2F0ZWdvcmlh=&pg=1&sec=Ng==&cat=NDA= (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  3. Soares, A.L.; Pinto, C.C.; Oliveira, S.C. Impacts of anthropogenic activities and calculation of the relative risk of violating surface water quality standards established by environmental legislation: A case study from the Piracicaba and Paraopeba river basins, Brazil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 14085–14099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Conceição, F.T.; Fernandes, A.M.; Hissler, C.; Lupinacci, C.M.; Menegário, A.A.; Moruzzi, R.B. Multi-tracer analysis to estimate the historical evolution of pollution in riverbed sediment of subtropical watershed, the lower course of the Piracicaba River, São Paulo, Brazil. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 743, 140730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. News about the Episode of Cyanobacterial Blooms in Piracicaba Rivers in December 2023 and January 2024. Available online: https://g1.globo.com/sp/piracicaba-regiao/noticia/2023/12/30/rio-piracicaba-amanhece-com-tonalidade-verde-e-especialista-coleta-amostra-para-analise.ghtml (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  6. Chen, L.; Giesy, J.P.; Svirčev, Z.; Meriluoto, J.; Codd, G.A.; Mijovic, B.; Shi, T.; Tuo, X.; Li, S.; Pan, B.; et al. Challenges of using blooms of Microcystis spp. in animal feeds: A comprehensive review of nutritional, toxicological and microbial health evaluation. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 764, 142319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Svirčev, Z.; Lalić, D.; Savić, G.B.; Tokodi, N.; Backović, D.D.; Chen, L.; Meriluoto, J.; Codd, G.A. Global geographical and historical overview of cyanotoxin distribution and cyanobacterial poisonings. Arch. Toxicol. 2019, 93, 2429–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chorus, I.; Welker, M. Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water. A Guide to Their Public Health Consequences, Monitoring and Management, 2nd ed; WHO Team—Water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Health (WSH); CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; p. 859. Available online: https://www.routledge.com/Toxic-Cyanobacteria-in-Water-A-Guide-to-Their-Public-Health-Consequences/Chorus-Welker/p/book/9780367533311 (accessed on 1 February 2025)ISBN 978-1-003-08144-9.
  9. Plaas, H.; Paerl, H. Toxic Cyanobacteria: A Growing Threat to Water and Air Quality. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 44–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cheng, Y.S.; Yue, Z.; Irvin, M.; Kirkpatrick, B.; Backer, L.C. Characterization of Aerosols Containing Microcystin. Mar. Drugs 2007, 5, 136–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Labohá, P.; Sychrová, E.; Brózman, O.; Sovadinová, I.; Bláhová, L.; Prokeš, R.; Ondráček, J.; Babica, P. Cyanobacteria, cyanotoxins and lipopolysaccharides in aerosols from inland freshwater bodies and their effects on human bronchial cells. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2023, 98, 104073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vejerano, E.P.; Ahn, J.; Scott, G.I. Aerosolized algal bloom toxins are not inert. Environ. Sci. Atmos. 2024, 4, 1113–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shultana, S.; Khan, R.A. Water quality assessment, reasons of river water pollution, impact on human health and remediation of polluted river water. GSCARR 2022, 10, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Katakwar, M. Narmada river water: Pollution and its impact on the human health. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2016, 4, 66–70. Available online: https://www.chemijournal.com/archives/2016/vol4issue2/PartB/4-2-20.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  15. Kormoker, T.; Islam, M.S.; Siddique, M.A.B.; Kumar, S.; Phoungthong, K.; Kabir, M.H.; Iqubal, K.F.; Kumar, R.; Ali, M.M.; Islam, A.R.M. Layer-wise physicochemical and elemental distribution in an urban river water, Bangladesh: Potential pollution, sources, and human health risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Adv. 2023, 2, 1382–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Departamento de Informação e Informática do SUS (DATASUS). Available online: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?sih/cnv/nisp.def (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  17. Comitês das Bacias Hidrográficas dos Rios Piracicaba, Capivari e Jundiaí (PCJ). Boletins Mensais. Available online: https://www.sspcj.org.br/index.php/boletimmensal (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  18. Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia (INMET). Available online: https://bdmep.inmet.gov.br/ (accessed on 1 February 2024).
  19. Sahu, N.; Maldhure, A.; Labhasetwar, P. Management of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins in drinking water: A comprehensive review on occurrence, toxicity, challenges and treatment approaches. Sci Total Environ 2025, 976, 179260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ministério da Saúde, Brasil. Resolução Nº 466, de 12 de Dezembro de 2012. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/2013/res0466_12_12_2012.html (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  21. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2024; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  22. Manly, B.F.J.; Alberto, J.A.N. Métodos Estatísticos Multivariados: Uma Introdução, 4th ed.; Bookman Editora: Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  23. Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.H.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; Minchin, P.R.; O’hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; Stevens, M.H.H.; Wagner, H. Package ‘vegan’. Community Ecol. Package Version 2013, 2, 1–295. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lê, S.; Josse, J.; Husson, F. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 2008, 25, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Revelle, W.R. Package ‘psych’: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research; Northwestern University: Evanston, IL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  26. Brooks, M.E.; Kristensen, K.; van Benthem, K.J.; Magnusson, A.; Berg, C.W.; Nielsen, A.; Skaug, H.J.; Mächler, M.; Bolker, B.M. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 2017, 9, 378–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hinde, J.; Demetrio, C.G.B. Overdipersion: Models and estimation. Comput Stat Data Anal. 1998, 27, 151–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hanif, M.; Miah, R.; Islam, M.; Marzia, S. Impact of Kapotaksha river water pollution on human health and environment. Prog. Agri. 2020, 31, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. BRASIL, Resolução CONAMA n°357, de 17 de março de 2005. Classificação de águas, Doces, Salobras e Salinas do Território Nacional. Available online: https://conama.mma.gov.br/?option=com_sisconama&task=arquivo.download&id=450 (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  30. Brasil, Portaria do Ministério da Saúde Portaria GM/MS n° 888, de 4 de maio de 2021. Procedimentos de Controle e de Vigilância da Qauldiade da água para Consumo Humano e Seu Padrão de Potabilidade. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2021/prt0888_07_05_2021.html (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  31. D’Amato, G.; D’Amato, M. Climate change, air pollution, pollen allergy and extreme atmospheric events. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2023, 35, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maciorowski, D.; Sharma, D.; Kunamneni, A. Environmental factors and their role in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Biosaf. Health 2021, 3, 235–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lipner, E.M.; French, J.P.; Mercaldo, R.A.; Nelson, S.; Zelazny, A.M.; Marshall, J.E.; Strong, M.; Falkinham, J.O., 3rd; Prevots, D.R. The risk of pulmonary NTM infections and water-quality constituents among persons with cystic fibrosis in the United States, 2010–2019. Environ. Epidemiol. 2023, 7, e266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lad, A.; Breidenbach, J.D.; Su, R.C.; Murray, J.; Kuang, R.; Mascarenhas, A.; Najjar, J.; Patel, S.; Hegde, P.; Youssef, M.; et al. As We Drink and Breathe: Adverse Health Effects of Microcystins and Other Harmful Algal Bloom Toxins in the Liver, Gut, Lungs and Beyond. Life 2022, 12, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Olson, N.E.; Cooke, M.E.; Shi, H.; Birbeck, J.A.; Westrick, J.A.; Ault, A.P. Harmful Algal Bloom Toxins in Aerosol Generated from Inland Lake Water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 4769–4780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Changhai, L.; Zaichun, W.; Bo, Y.; Dan, L.; Shaohua, W. Micronutrientes e doenças alérgicas: Um estudo de randomização mendeliana. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2025, 186, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Peroni, D.G.; Hufnagl, K.; Comberiati, P.; Roth-Walter, F. Lack of iron, zinc, and vitamins as a contributor to the etiology of atopic diseases. Front. Nutr. 2023, 9, 1032481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lorenz, C.; Libonati, R.; Belém, L.B.C.; Oliveira, A.; Chiaravalloti, R.M.; Nunes, A.V.; Batista, E.K.L.; Fernandes, G.W.; Chiaravalloti-Neto, F.; Damasceno-Junior, G.A.; et al. Historical association between respiratory diseases hospitalizations and fire occurrence in the Pantanal wetland, Brazil. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2024, 15, 102182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Camargo, J.A.; Alonso, A. Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: A global assessment. Environ. Int. 2006, 32, 831–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Marozkina, N.V.; Gaston, B. Nitrogen Chemistry and Lung Physiology. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 2015, 77, 431–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Fares, A. Global patterns of seasonal variation in gastrointestinal diseases. J. Postgrad. Med. 2013, 59, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ji, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Elumalai, V.; Subramani, T. Seasonal Variation of Drinking Water Quality and Human Health Risk Assessment in Hancheng City of Guanzhong Plain, China. Expo Health 2020, 12, 469–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Giannuzzi, L.; Sedan, D.; Echenique, R.; Andrinolo, D. An Acute Case of Intoxication with Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins in Recreational Water in Salto Grande Dam, Argentina. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 2164–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Reid, N.; Reyne, M.I.; O’Neill, W.; Greer, B.; He, Q.; Burdekin, O.; McGrath, J.W.; Elliott, C.T. Unprecedented Harmful algal bloom in the UK and Ireland’s largest lake associated with gastrointestinal bacteria, microcystins and anabaenopeptins presenting an environmental and public health risk. Environ. Int. 2024, 190, 108934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Peacock, M. Phosphate Metabolism in Health and Disease. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2021, 108, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hamedani, A.G.; Thibault, D.; Willis, A.W. Seasonal Variation in Neurologic Hospitalizations in the United States. Ann. Neurol. 2023, 93, 743–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Su, X.; Song, H.; Cheng, Y.; Yao, X.; Li, Y. The mortality burden of nervous system diseases attributed to ambient temperature: A multi-city study in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 800, 149548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Huang, Y.; Song, H.; Wang, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Hao, S.; Li, N.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; et al. Heat and outpatient visits of skin diseases—A multisite analysis in China, 2014–2018. Heliyon 2022, 8, 11203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Khodaei, B.; Seyedpour, S.; Gholami, B.; Garmarudi, G.; Nasimi, M. Seasonal and gender variation in skin disease: A cross-sectional study of 3120 patients at Razi hospital. Int. J. Women’s Dermatol. 2021, 7, 799–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mandell, J.T.; Idarraga, M.; Kumar, N.; Galor, A. impact of Air Pollution and Weather on Dry Eye. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Berg, E.J.; Ying, G.; Maguire, M.G.; Sheffield, P.E.; Szczotka-Flynn, L.B.; Asbell, P.A.; Shen, J.F. DREAM Study Research Group; Climatic and Environmental Correlates of Dry Eye Disease Severity: A Report From the Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) Study. Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech. 2020, 9, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jin, Y.; Wang, F.; Carpenter, M.; Weller, R.B.; Tabor, D.; Payne, S.R. The effect of indoor thermal and humidity condition on the oldest-old people’s comfort and skin condition in winter. Build. Environ. 2020, 174, 106790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Skowron, K.; Bauza-Kaszewska, J.; Kraszewska, Z.; Wiktorczyk-Kapischke, N.; Grudlewska-Buda, K.; Kwiecińska-Piróg, J.; Wałecka-Zacharska, E.; Radtke, L.; Gospodarek-Komkowska, E. Human Skin Microbiome: Impact of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors on Skin Microbiota. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, W.; Whalen, J.K.; Cai, C.; Shan, K.; Zhou, H. Harmful cyanobacteria-diatom/dinoflagellate blooms and their cyanotoxins in freshwaters: A nonnegligible chronic health and ecological hazard. Water Res. 2023, 233, 119807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Funari, E.; Manganelli, M.; Buratti, F.M.; Testai, E. Cyanobacteria blooms in water: Italian guidelines to assess and manage the risk associated to bathing and recreational activities. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 598, 867–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (A) A correlation matrix between diseases. (B) A correlation matrix between physicochemical and biological water variables. Correlations were calculated using the bootstrap method with 10,000 simulations. Correlations marked with “X” indicate non-significant results. The color gradient reflects the strength and direction of correlations, ranging from −0.5 (red) to 1.0 (green).
Figure 1. (A) A correlation matrix between diseases. (B) A correlation matrix between physicochemical and biological water variables. Correlations were calculated using the bootstrap method with 10,000 simulations. Correlations marked with “X” indicate non-significant results. The color gradient reflects the strength and direction of correlations, ranging from −0.5 (red) to 1.0 (green).
Toxics 13 00359 g001
Figure 2. The heatmap showing the temporal variation of disease incidence across different years. The rows represent the years, while the columns represent the diseases. Hierarchical clustering of diseases (top) and years (left) was performed based on the Spearman’s correlation matrix obtained through 10,000 bootstrap simulations. The UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean) method was used as the linkage criterion. The color gradient represents the standardized incidence values, ranging from −4 (yellow) to 4 (purple).
Figure 2. The heatmap showing the temporal variation of disease incidence across different years. The rows represent the years, while the columns represent the diseases. Hierarchical clustering of diseases (top) and years (left) was performed based on the Spearman’s correlation matrix obtained through 10,000 bootstrap simulations. The UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean) method was used as the linkage criterion. The color gradient represents the standardized incidence values, ranging from −4 (yellow) to 4 (purple).
Toxics 13 00359 g002
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) biplots. The graphs represent the projections on the planes: (A) PC1 vs. PC2, (B) PC1 vs. PC3, (C) PC2 vs. PC3, and (D) PC1 vs. PC4. The arrows represent the original variables, with direction and length indicating the correlation with the principal components. The colors of the arrows reflect the relative contribution of each variable to the formation of the respective principal axes, following a viridis color scale (from purple to yellow, with higher values indicating greater importance). The analyzed variables include water parameters (pH, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, N-NH₃, N-NO₃, total inorganic nitrogen, total phosphorus, soluble phosphorus, P-PO₄3−, cyanobacteria concentration, and chlorophyll), river parameters (flow rate, discharge, and precipitation), and climate parameters (temperature and humidity).
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) biplots. The graphs represent the projections on the planes: (A) PC1 vs. PC2, (B) PC1 vs. PC3, (C) PC2 vs. PC3, and (D) PC1 vs. PC4. The arrows represent the original variables, with direction and length indicating the correlation with the principal components. The colors of the arrows reflect the relative contribution of each variable to the formation of the respective principal axes, following a viridis color scale (from purple to yellow, with higher values indicating greater importance). The analyzed variables include water parameters (pH, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, N-NH₃, N-NO₃, total inorganic nitrogen, total phosphorus, soluble phosphorus, P-PO₄3−, cyanobacteria concentration, and chlorophyll), river parameters (flow rate, discharge, and precipitation), and climate parameters (temperature and humidity).
Toxics 13 00359 g003
Figure 4. Random effects of GLMMs with a negative binomial distribution for respiratory diseases: (A) DRS and (B) DRS_ODNPS. The left panels show random effects for the year/season, and the right panels show random effects for the year. Dots represent point estimates, and horizontal bars indicate 90% confidence intervals. Significant effects (blue) have confidence intervals that do not overlap the zero reference line (dashed magenta), while non-significant effects are shown in black.
Figure 4. Random effects of GLMMs with a negative binomial distribution for respiratory diseases: (A) DRS and (B) DRS_ODNPS. The left panels show random effects for the year/season, and the right panels show random effects for the year. Dots represent point estimates, and horizontal bars indicate 90% confidence intervals. Significant effects (blue) have confidence intervals that do not overlap the zero reference line (dashed magenta), while non-significant effects are shown in black.
Toxics 13 00359 g004
Figure 5. Random effects of GLMMs with a negative binomial distribution for diseases of the digestive system: (A) DDS_ODDS, (B) DDS_DGPI, and (C) DDS_ODESD. Dots represent point estimates, and horizontal bars indicate 90% confidence intervals. Significant effects (blue) have confidence intervals not overlapping the zero reference line (dashed magenta), while non-significant effects are shown in black.
Figure 5. Random effects of GLMMs with a negative binomial distribution for diseases of the digestive system: (A) DDS_ODDS, (B) DDS_DGPI, and (C) DDS_ODESD. Dots represent point estimates, and horizontal bars indicate 90% confidence intervals. Significant effects (blue) have confidence intervals not overlapping the zero reference line (dashed magenta), while non-significant effects are shown in black.
Toxics 13 00359 g005
Figure 6. Random effects from GLMMs with a negative binomial distribution for nervous system diseases: (A) DNS, and other diseases: (B) DSST, (C) ODSST, (D) SSTI, (E) DEA, and (F) ODEA. Dots represent point estimates, and horizontal bars indicate 90% confidence intervals. Significant effects (blue) have confidence intervals that do not overlap the zero reference line (dashed magenta), while non-significant effects are shown in black.
Figure 6. Random effects from GLMMs with a negative binomial distribution for nervous system diseases: (A) DNS, and other diseases: (B) DSST, (C) ODSST, (D) SSTI, (E) DEA, and (F) ODEA. Dots represent point estimates, and horizontal bars indicate 90% confidence intervals. Significant effects (blue) have confidence intervals that do not overlap the zero reference line (dashed magenta), while non-significant effects are shown in black.
Toxics 13 00359 g006
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of disease variables and physicochemical and biological water parameters (PBW) monitored in the Piracicaba River basin between 2019 and 2024. The table presents the minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation (SD), and range for each variable.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of disease variables and physicochemical and biological water parameters (PBW) monitored in the Piracicaba River basin between 2019 and 2024. The table presents the minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation (SD), and range for each variable.
VariableDomainMinMaxMeanSDRange
DRSDisease56321192.840659.3352265.0000
DRS_ADisease1378.63776.507836.0000
DRS_ODNPSDisease15123.536211.043550.0000
DRS_ODRSDisease154930.17397.772434.0000
DDSDisease103671347.8406131.5954568.0000
DDS_ODDSDisease146935.536210.709555.0000
DDS_DGPIDisease1206.91304.079119.0000
DDS_OLVDisease2148.34782.639212.0000
DDS_OIIDDisease183.53621.71997.0000
DDS_ODESDDisease18611.869615.662785.0000
DNSDisease268951.652213.949363.0000
DNS_ODNSDisease22110.59423.949419.0000
DSSTDisease1820377.376847.1163185.0000
ODSSTDisease1218162.463844.6258169.0000
SSTIDisease42714.88415.865023.0000
IPSOCECDisease214373289.391331.1388159.0000
DEADisease2745110.9420135.3495743.0000
ODEADisease1224.89863.773521.0000
AFPBW1521666.602248.3878200.1700
LFPBW131.56460.49192.0500
PPBW1324898.389061.2965234.7800
ATPBW1727222,6302.61999.9000
AHPBW348365.741310.902048.8500
pHPBW787.31170.20761.1000
DOPBW152.96170.97534.5500
TurbidityPBW347836.199680.5959474.7800
N_NH3PBW0143.50422.498313.1300
N_NO3PBW0393.25914.532338.5000
NiPBW2436.76355.247140.2800
PHPBW020.79260.41271.7600
PSPBW010.44180.27201.0620
P_PO4_3PBW031.35290.83403.2500
CyanPBW1943122,48017,167.289918,618.2456120,537.0000
ChlPBW714539.337133.4134138.3800
Table 2. Standardized coefficients of canonical pairs between disease variables (X) and physicochemical and biological water variables (PBW) of the Piracicaba River (Y).
Table 2. Standardized coefficients of canonical pairs between disease variables (X) and physicochemical and biological water variables (PBW) of the Piracicaba River (Y).
Diseases (X)PBW (Y)First Canonical PairSecond Canonical Pair
X Can1Y Can1X Can2Y Can2
DRSAF1.1154−1.459−0.1674−0.9173
DRS_ALF−0.21861.08940.51880.7965
DRS_ODNPSP−0.43090.3952−0.0246−0.3262
DRS_ODRSAT0.1153−0.54850.3079−0.0159
DDSAH−0.1943−0.1272−0.1064−0.1788
DDS_ODDSpH0.0188−0.18190.4909−0.2355
DDS_DGPIDO−0.0162−0.2238−0.389−0.0324
DDS_OLVTurbidity0.0828−0.1021−0.0423−0.1115
DDS_OIIDN_NH30.07660.1881−0.2058−1.2125
DDS_ODESDN_NO30.29840.7135−0.0307−0.3094
DNSNi−0.0304−0.7545−0.06190.826
DNS_ODNSPH−0.14020.1609−0.13060.7079
DSSTPS−0.7364−3.21991.6910.7986
ODSSTP_PO4_30.86042.5739−1.1225−0.8186
SSTICyan0.0391−0.07520.01420.1643
IPSOCECChl−0.10940.0529−0.5083−0.7244
DEA-−1.2629-0.1506-
ODEA-−0.0418-0.0639-
Correlation0.900.83
p-value0.000370.036
Table 3. Results of the generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with negative binomial distribution for respiratory diseases.
Table 3. Results of the generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with negative binomial distribution for respiratory diseases.
DiseasesSignificant Fixed EffectsYear/Season (Random Effect)Year (Random Effect)
DRS-
DRS_APC2 ↓--
DRS_ODNPSPC1 ↓
DRS_ODRS---
✓ has an effect.
Table 4. Results of the generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with negative binomial distribution digestive system.
Table 4. Results of the generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with negative binomial distribution digestive system.
DiseasesSignificant Fixed EffectsYear/Season (Random Effect)Year (Random Effect)
DDS-
DDS_ODDSPC2 ↓--
DDS_DGPIPC3 ↑
DDS_OLV---
DDS_OIID---
DDS_ODESDPC2 ↑-
✓ has an effect.
Table 5. Results of the generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with negative binomial distribution for nervous system and other diseases.
Table 5. Results of the generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with negative binomial distribution for nervous system and other diseases.
DiseasesSignificant Fixed EffectsYear/Season (Random Effect)Year (Random Effect)
Diseases nervous system
DNS--
DNS_ODNS---
Other diseases
DSST--
ODSST--
SSTIPC1↓ and PC2 ↓-
IPSOCECPC3 ↑ and PC4 ↓--
DEAPC3 ↑
ODEA--
✓ has an effect.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Souza, A.O.d.; Amorim, D.J.; Pinto, E. Correlation Analysis Between Physical–Chemical and Biological Conditions in the River and the Incidence of Diseases in the City of Piracicaba, Brazil. Toxics 2025, 13, 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050359

AMA Style

Souza AOd, Amorim DJ, Pinto E. Correlation Analysis Between Physical–Chemical and Biological Conditions in the River and the Incidence of Diseases in the City of Piracicaba, Brazil. Toxics. 2025; 13(5):359. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Souza, Alexander Ossanes de, Deoclecio Jardim Amorim, and Ernani Pinto. 2025. "Correlation Analysis Between Physical–Chemical and Biological Conditions in the River and the Incidence of Diseases in the City of Piracicaba, Brazil" Toxics 13, no. 5: 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050359

APA Style

Souza, A. O. d., Amorim, D. J., & Pinto, E. (2025). Correlation Analysis Between Physical–Chemical and Biological Conditions in the River and the Incidence of Diseases in the City of Piracicaba, Brazil. Toxics, 13(5), 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050359

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop