Next Article in Journal
Toxic Metals in Road Dust from Urban Industrial Complexes: Seasonal Distribution, Bioaccessibility and Integrated Health Risk Assessment Using Triangular Fuzzy Number
Previous Article in Journal
Pollution Status, Ecological Risks, and Potential Sources of Metals in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Lianjiang River Basin, Guangdong Province, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mercury Dynamics and Bioaccumulation Risk Assessment in Three Gold Mining-Impacted Amazon River Basins
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Closing Editorial: Mercury Cycling and Health Effects

by
José Vicente Elias Bernardi
1,*,
Wanderley Rodrigues Bastos
2,
Jurandir Rodrigues de Souza
3 and
Carlos José Sousa Passos
4
1
Geostatistics and Geodesy Laboratory, UnB Planaltina College, University of Brasilia, Planaltina 73345-010, DF, Brazil
2
Laboratório de Biogeoquímica Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Rondônia, Porto Velho 76815-800, RO, Brazil
3
Laboratório de Química Analítica e Ambiental, Instituto de Química, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, DF, Brazil
4
Faculty UnB at Planaltina (FUP/UnB) Planaltina, University of Brasília, Brasília 73345-010, DF, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2025, 13(10), 841; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13100841
Submission received: 16 September 2025 / Accepted: 28 September 2025 / Published: 2 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mercury Cycling and Health Effects)
Mercury (Hg) is a persistent global contaminant that cycles among the atmosphere, rivers, oceans, soils, and biota. In aquatic ecosystems, inorganic forms are photochemically, and preferably, microbially transformed into methylmercury (MeHg), which bioaccumulates in fish and biomagnifies up food webs—the dominant human exposure route in most populations, especially those most isolated from urban areas. The World Health Organization identifies mercury as one of the top chemicals of major public-health concern; MeHg is a well-established neurotoxicant with vulnerability during fetal and early-life development [1].
Global inventories attribute the largest share of anthropogenic Hg emissions to artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM), followed by fossil-fuel combustion and certain industrial processes. Once emitted, atmospheric Hg undergoes long-range transport and hemispheric redistribution before deposition, where it can be emitted or methylated depending on the biogeochemical conditions. The Global Mercury Assessment (2018) and its technical background syntheses remain foundational references for quantifying sources, environmental transport, and regional hotspots [2,3].
The Minamata Convention on Mercury—adopted in 2013 and in force since 2017—establishes binding controls on a wide spectrum of Hg sources including primary mining, product manufacture and trade, emissions to air and releases to aquatic ecosystems, storage and waste, and informal sectors such as ASGM. The Convention has catalyzed national action plans, phase-outs, and technology upgrades; however, implementation gaps persist, and many countries face capacity constraints in monitoring, enforcement, and risk communication [4].
From a health perspective, elemental Hg vapor (Hg0) is efficiently absorbed via inhalation and is oxidized to inorganic Hg, with the kidneys and brain as principal deposition sites; chronic exposure can lead to neurobehavioral changes and renal effects. The U.S. EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) sets a chronic inhalation reference concentration (RfC) of 0.3 μg·m−3 for Hg0, derived from human occupational studies of subtle neurobehavioral endpoints [5], while the ATSDR Toxicological Profile synthesizes evidence across exposure routes, toxicokinetics, and susceptible populations [6].
Risk management and governance must also account for the benefits of fish consumption—especially long-chain omega-3 fatty acids and high-quality protein—against MeHg risk. The 2023 Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation provides an updated framework for balancing the nutritional benefits of fish with contaminant risks, supporting risk-communication approaches that are species-, population-, and context-specific [7].
Against this backdrop, this Special Issue brings together complementary perspectives on MeHg exposure and health: multi-decadal biomonitoring of consumed fish, trophic-position indicators using Hg, a systematic review of regional contamination patterns in biota and humans, maternal exposure during pregnancy, mechanistic links between prenatal MeHg and neurodevelopment, and basin-scale modeling of Hg dynamics and consumption risk. Together, these contributions illuminate data gaps, methodological needs, and policy opportunities that can inform future surveillance, intervention design, and Minamata Convention implementation.
Occupational and urban inhalation exposures. Most papers emphasize diet-related MeHg exposures; inhalation of elemental Hg0 in urban/industrial or WWTP settings is under-represented, thus there is a need to complement dietary pathways and reflect diverse global contexts.
Intervention and risk-communication studies. Stronger evaluation of advisories (e.g., fish-switching strategies), community co-design, and policy impact tracking (pre/post interventions) are needed, especially for indigenous communities in hotspot basins.
Longitudinal epidemiological studies. Extend from cross-sectional biomarkers (e.g., hair in pregnancy) to prospective cohorts linking exposure, molecular markers (omics, epigenetics), and neurocognitive outcomes (infancy → adolescence).
Food-web integration beyond fish. Vegetables, fruits, rice, and bushmeat in Hg-impacted regions remain understudied; coupled isotope/Hg speciation could refine trophic and source apportionment.
Comparability and QA/QC. Harmonized analytical methods, reporting units, detection limits, and uncertainty; wider use of CRMs and inter-lab comparisons to support meta-analysis and regulatory use.
Model-data fusion. Broaden SERAFM-like modeling with uncertainty quantification, remote sensing (land-use/deforestation), and climate variability; validate with targeted field campaigns.
Geographic balance. While the Amazon is appropriately prominent, future calls should solicit studies from Africa, SE Asia, and Arctic/sub-Arctic systems to generalize the findings.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

We extend our sincere gratitude to all reviewers whose careful, constructive evaluations strengthened the scientific rigor and clarity of these works. Your dedication upholds the quality standards of Toxics and accelerates progress on mercury risk mitigation. We warmly thank the authors for their high-quality submissions, responsiveness during peer review, and commitment to open science. Your contributions advance understanding from molecules to river basins and from exposure metrics to public-health implications.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • de Lacerda, L.D.; de Almeida, R.; Bastos, W.R. A 35-Year Record (1987–2022) of Hg Concentrations in Two of the Fish Species Most Consumed by People Living in the Upper Madeira River Basin, Brazilian Amazon Region. Toxics 2024, 12, 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12020144.
  • de Castro Moraes, L.; Bernardi, J.V.E.; de Souza, J.P.R.; Portela, J.F.; Pereira, H.R.; de Oliveira Barbosa, H.; Pires, N.L.; Monteiro, L.C.; Rodrigues, Y.O.S.; Vieira, L.C.G.; et al. Mercury Contamination as an Indicator of Fish Species’ Trophic Position in the Middle Araguaia River, Brazil. Toxics 2023, 11, 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11110886.
  • Martoredjo, I.; Calvão Santos, L.B.; Vilhena, J.C.E.; Rodrigues, A.B.L.; de Almeida, A.; Sousa Passos, C.J.; Florentino, A.C. Trends in Mercury Contamination Distribution among Human and Animal Populations in the Amazon Region. Toxics 2024, 12, 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12030204.
  • Rumiantseva, O.; Komov, V.; Kutuzov, M.; Zaroual, H.; Mizina, K.; Belova, M.; Nikitin, I.; Stolyarova, A.; Mashin, D.; Vilkova, D. Hair Mercury Levels in Pregnant Women: Fish Consumption as a Determinant of Exposure. Toxics 2024, 12, 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12050366.
  • Leung, J.W.-H.; Loan, A.; Xu, Y.; Yang, G.; Wang, J.; Chan, H.M. Reduction of Glyoxalase 1 Expression Links Fetal Methylmercury Exposure to Autism Spectrum Disorder Pathogenesis. Toxics 2024, 12, 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12070449.
  • Domingues, V.S.; Colmenero, C.; Vinograd, M.; Oliveira-da-Costa, M.; Balbueno, R. Mercury Dynamics and Bioaccumulation Risk Assessment in Three Gold Mining-Impacted Amazon River Basins. Toxics 2024, 12, 599. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12080599.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Mercury and Health—Fact Sheet. 2024. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mercury-and-health (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  2. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Global Mercury Assessment 2018; UNEP Chemicals and Waste Branch: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Available online: https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/global-mercury-assessment-2018 (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  3. AMAP/UN Environment. Technical Background Report to the Global Mercury Assessment 2018; Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: Oslo, Norway, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Minamata Convention on Mercury. Text and Annexes; UNEP: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; Available online: https://www.unep.org/globalmercurypartnership/resources/policy-and-strategy/minamata-convention-mercury (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS): Mercury, Elemental (CASRN 7439-97-6). Reference Concentration (RfC) = 0.3 μg/m3. Available online: https://iris.epa.gov (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  6. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Mercury; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2022. Available online: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp46.pdf (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  7. FAO/WHO. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on the Risks and Benefits of Fish Consumption—Updated Framework; WHO Technical Report; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; Available online: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/379356 (accessed on 26 August 2025).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bernardi, J.V.E.; Bastos, W.R.; de Souza, J.R.; Sousa Passos, C.J. Closing Editorial: Mercury Cycling and Health Effects. Toxics 2025, 13, 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13100841

AMA Style

Bernardi JVE, Bastos WR, de Souza JR, Sousa Passos CJ. Closing Editorial: Mercury Cycling and Health Effects. Toxics. 2025; 13(10):841. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13100841

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bernardi, José Vicente Elias, Wanderley Rodrigues Bastos, Jurandir Rodrigues de Souza, and Carlos José Sousa Passos. 2025. "Closing Editorial: Mercury Cycling and Health Effects" Toxics 13, no. 10: 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13100841

APA Style

Bernardi, J. V. E., Bastos, W. R., de Souza, J. R., & Sousa Passos, C. J. (2025). Closing Editorial: Mercury Cycling and Health Effects. Toxics, 13(10), 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13100841

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop