Next Article in Journal
Occurrence, Sources, and Health Risks of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Road Environments from Harbin, a Megacity of China
Next Article in Special Issue
Toxicity of Titanium Dioxide–Cerium Oxide Nanocomposites to Zebrafish Embryos: A Preliminary Evaluation
Previous Article in Journal
Saxitoxin-Producing Raphidiopsis raciborskii (Cyanobacteria) Constrains Daphnia Fitness and Feeding Rate despite High Nutritious Food Availability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Neurotoxicity and Oxidative Stress Development in Adult Atya lanipes Shrimp Exposed to Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles

by
Stefani Cruz-Rosa
* and
Omar Pérez-Reyes
*
Department of Environmental Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Campus, San Juan 00925, Puerto Rico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2023, 11(8), 694; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11080694
Submission received: 9 June 2023 / Revised: 3 August 2023 / Accepted: 9 August 2023 / Published: 11 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Toxicity of Nanoparticles on Freshwater Ecosystem)

Abstract

:
Titanium dioxide is a type of nanoparticle that is composed of one titanium atom and two oxygen atoms. One of its physicochemical activities is photolysis, which produces different reactive oxygen species (ROS). Atya lanipes shrimp affect detrital processing and illustrate the potential importance of diversity and nutrient availability to the rest of the food web. It is essential in removing sediments, which have an important role in preventing eutrophication. This study aimed to determine the toxic effect of changes in behavior and levels of oxidative stress due to exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles in Atya lanipes and to determine the effective concentration (EC50) for behavioral variables. The concentrations of TiO2 NPs tested were 0.0, 0.50, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/L with the positive controls given 100 µg/L of titanium and 3.0 mg/L of TiO2 NPs ± 100 µg/L of titanium. After 24 h of exposure, significant hypoactivity was documented. The EC50 was determined to be a concentration of 0.14 mg/L. After the exposure to 10 mg/L of TiO2 NPs, oxidative stress in gastrointestinal and nervous tissues was documented. The toxic effects of this emerging aquatic pollutant in acute exposure conditions were characterized by sublethal effects such as behavior changes and oxidative stress.

1. Introduction

Titanium dioxide is a type of nanoparticle that is composed of one titanium atom and two oxygen atoms. One of its physicochemical activities is photolysis, which produces different reactive oxygen species (ROS) [1,2]. In this way, it is a chemically inert and photocatalytic nanoparticle that reflects all the colors of the light spectrum (since it reflects white light). Also, titanium dioxide is a white and fine powder [3]; it can exist in different forms, such as rutile, anatase, and brookite [4,5,6]. The anatase form is the most photocatalytic arrangement of this nanoparticle [7,8].
Due to their photocatalytic activities, titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) are of great interest because they are used in paints and coatings as self-cleaning, antimicrobial, and antifouling agents, a food additive, and as a UV absorber in cosmetics [9,10]. From 2006 to 2010, the commercial production of titanium dioxide was 5000 metric tons per year; from 2011 to 2014, it was more than 10,000 metric tons, and it is estimated to reach 2.5 million metric tons by 2025 [11].
The rapid production and use of TiO2 NPs result in a direct and indirect release into aquatic environments through bathing, industrial effluent, and engineering applications [12,13]. In this way, one of the ecosystems affected by the presence of TiO2 NPs is the freshwater ecosystem. The environmental concentrations of these NPs in freshwater ecosystems are variable in the scientific literature. However, the health of the river can be affected by TiO2 NPs in ways that are not yet quantified. Nevertheless, some studies have demonstrated the presence of TiO2 NPs in high concentrations in natural surface waters and rivers [14]. However, most studies focus on determining TiO2 NP levels in surface waters, and few studies have studied these in sediments. Despite the lack of standardized quantification of TiO2 NPs in aquatic ecosystems, European studies have determined that the concentrations of TiO2 NPs in freshwater range from 0.015 to 24.5 micrograms/liter [15]. On the other hand, studies have documented that soil concentrations may exceed 100 micrograms/liter [14]. However, concentrations of titanium (including TiO2 NPs) were measured in the United States and Canada in a study involving 15 rivers. The concentrations of titanium in these rivers ranged from 0.5 to15 micrograms/liter and, in some soils and sediments, about 10–100 g/kg with an average of less than 5 g/kg [16].
In the Caribbean and Puerto Rican freshwater ecosystems, we have an important shrimp species named Atya lanipes Holthuis 1963. Atya lanipes are a scraper/filter feeder shrimp that live part of their life as planktonic organisms until they reach the youth stage. This amphidromous life cycle of the Caribbean freshwater shrimp represents an important relationship between the headwaters and estuaries [17]. Crowl (2001) [18], among others, demonstrated that Atya lanipes affect detrital processing and illustrate the potential importance of diversity and nutrient availability to the rest of the food web. Also, Atya lanipes are essential in removing sediments from streams, which have an important role in preventing eutrophication in this aquatic environment. For this reason, any contaminant that can both settle or accumulate/dissolve in the water could harm this species and alter its role in the ecosystem. Therefore, TiO2 NPs, like other hydrophobic nanomaterials, tend to sediment as their fate in aquatic ecosystems. In this way, Atya lanipes will be susceptible to the presence of these engineering nanoparticles in two different aquatic ecosystems: estuaries and rivers. This makes Atya lanipes an excellent nano-toxicological model.
Studies with TiO2 NPs have found that these NPs, acting as adsorptive agents, interact with metals and are stored in sediments [19]. In addition, it has been shown that that adsorptive ability of TiO2 NPs can exacerbate the bioavailability and neurotoxicity of organic pollutants and pesticides [19]. There have also been several studies that focused on using the photocatalysis (formation of oxidative agents) of TiO2 NPs for remediation and treatment of wastewater but many of these studies did not consider the possible toxicity to aquatic organisms [20,21].
Researchers have recognized the reaction between nanomaterials and biological systems in many ecotoxicology studies [22]. However, most of these studies have been conducted in bacteria, cell lines, and rodent animals [23]. Nevertheless, these studies reveal the development of oxidative stress as the principal biological effect. Oxidative stress is produced by free radicals, which contain one unpaired electron and are highly reactive and capable of damaging molecules and transforming them into reactive molecules. These produce a redox chain reaction that damages cells and tissues in biological systems. This includes cell toxicity by oxidation of lipids, proteins, carbohydrates, and nucleotides leading to the formation of intracellular aggregates, mitochondrial dysfunction, excitotoxicity, and apoptosis. All biological systems have an antioxidant defense to avoid oxidative stress. The antioxidants act by decreasing the concentration of oxidants, preventing the initiation of the chain reaction by “sweeping” (covering or stopping a very highly reactive chemical) the first free radicals to form, binding to metal ions to prevent the formation of reactive species, transforming peroxides into less reactive products, and stopping the spread and increase in free radicals. One example of a very important antioxidant enzyme is catalase which acts as a metabolizer, transforming peroxides into H2O and O2. In this way, this enzyme minimizes oxidative stress damage [24].
The biological effects from oxidative stress induced by TiO2 NPs are known as dose-dependent toxicity indices. Some studies focused on green algae (Desmodesmus subspicatus) have determined that EC50 = 44 mg/L [25]. There are no dose–response toxicological analyses on Atya lanipes shrimp for behavioral variables (another important sublethal effect). These indices are imperative to explore in this species due to its susceptibility to contamination in water bodies, particularly for nanomaterials, as we have previously discussed. It is necessary to determine the toxicological indices for TiO2 NPs in terms of behavioral variables to analyze the environmental risk from this type of nanoparticles in the freshwater ecosystems inhabited by this species [23]. Also, this shrimp needs a healthy nervous system to complete its complex life cycle (which includes migrations), acquire food, avoid predation, and fulfill its other ecological roles.
This study aimed to determine the toxic effects of exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles reflected in changes in behavior and development of oxidative stress during the adult life cycle of Atya lanipes shrimp and to determine the dose–response index (EC50), for behavioral variables after exposure to different TiO2 NP suspension concentrations. We found that acute exposure to TiO2 NPs produced a toxic effect on the nervous system of Atya lanipes shrimp, resulting in hypoactivity as has been determined in the larval stage of this species [26]; we also observed the effects of TiO2 NPs at concentrations at the mg/L scale due to the capacity of anatase form of this nanoparticle to produce oxidative stress. A Probit analysis for behavioral variables showed an EC50 of TiO2 NPs at a low concentration. Also, the development of oxidative stress was evident and remained constant during the acute exposure, reflected in an increase in catalase enzyme activity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Characterization of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Suspensions (TiO2 NPs)

Titanium dioxide nanopowder, with a particle size until 25 nm (Sigma Aldrich Chemical Company St. Louis, MO, USA, Titanium IV Oxide, Anatase nanopowder), was used to conduct the experiments. The titanium dioxide powder was spread on a weighing paper and gently picked up by the sticky carbon surface above the aluminum stubs. An S4700 II cFEG SEM (Hitachi High Technologies-America, Schaumburg, IL, US) with a silicon drift EDX detector (Oxford Instruments, X-MaxN, Abingdon, UK) was used to measure the surface morphology, elemental composition, and distribution of elements. All the SEM data reported were obtained at an acceleration voltage of 10 kV, and the images were collected with a Secondary Electron detector. The elemental mapping and energy spectrums were acquired with Aztec tools (Oxford Instruments, UK). The elemental analysis through the energy dispersive spectrum indicated the presence of Ti, O, C, and S elements (61, 36.1, 2.6, and 0.3 wt%, respectively) (Figure 1).

2.2. Atya lanipes Specimens Collection

Adult Atya lanipes specimens were collected and identified [27], using baited minnow traps at the Sonadora Stream at the El Verde Field Station, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico. The pools at the Sonadora Stream have a depth that range between 0.5 and 1.5 m, but we selected pools with a depth of 0.5 m. The sampling period was from January 2022 to June 2022 when the climate and specimen availability were favorable. Baited traps (dry cat food was used as the bait) were set in different pools along the stream and removed 24 h later. The collected shrimp were transported to the laboratory in a cooler under constant aeration. The shrimp were transferred individually to glass tanks (15 cm × 15 cm × 15 cm) with 1 L of dechlorinated water and constant aeration. The animals were acclimated for 72–120 h (three to five days) in the laboratory environment before the bioassay.

2.3. The Microcosm

Fifty microcosms (25 for the control and 25 for each treated group) were designed. They consisted of a square aquarium containing 1 L of dechlorinated water; 150 g of synthetic sediment that was previously sterilized with activated carbon and heated in an oven at a temperature of 50–60 °C; an air stone with an air pump; and LED lamps with a 10 h/14 h light/dark photoperiod (controlled by an automatic timer). The water temperature was kept between 19 and 21 °C (Figure 2). These variables reflect the environmental conditions in which Atya lanipes live in the wild.

2.4. Acute Toxicity Tests

Before the bioassay, we mixed the titanium dioxide nanopowder with one L of dechlorinated and oxygenated (for 24 h) water using a magnetic stirrer at maximum speed for 30 min. Subsequently, TiO2 NPs were weighed to obtain final concentrations of 0.0, 0.50, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/L. The nanoparticles were added into the fish tanks and left to fall by gravity; the aquarium water was mixed with a glass stirrer to obtain homogeneity in the microcosm. For each treatment, we set up 25 replicates each for the treated group and controls. The positive controls were exposed to titanium (100 mg/L) and TiO2 NPs and titanium (3.0 mg/L; 100 mg/L). The microcosms were set in an exposure bench covered with a piece of blue fabric to prevent the entry of external light and to control any possible contamination. Physicochemical parameters (temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, dissolved solids, and pH) of the water of each microcosm were taken before and after the exposure period using a Hanna HI98129 and Sper Scientific 850045 dissolved oxygen meter pen. After preparing the microcosms with their respective treatments, the Atya lanipes adults were randomly assigned to each treatment. Measurements of the post-orbital and cephalothorax of the shrimp were collected. Then, shrimp were individually introduced into the microcosms and left exposed to the treatments for an acute exposure of 24 h. No separation by sex was made because this species does not present clear sexual dimorphism traits. Instead, we randomly selected specimens ensuring a similar range of sizes for each treated and control group. Gravid shrimp were excluded from the bioassay. Shrimp were not fed during the bioassay.

2.5. Behavioral Analysis

A movement analysis was carried out after acute exposure to TiO2 NPs for 24 h. Atya lanipes shrimp are more active at night; therefore, in order to analyze these patterns in the laboratory setting, we created a recording scenario that simulates nighttime for these organisms. The shrimp recordings were performed in a red box with red light because they do not detect this light wavelength. Also, in control organisms, it was observed that, in the box, they were active at the corners and never went toward the center of the recording box. Moving to the center of the box has the possibility of being preyed on.
Each specimen of Atya lanipes in the experiment was removed from the exposure tank and acclimatized for 3 min in a red plastic box with 2 L of dechlorinated water that was previously oxygenated for 24 h (it was changed with new water for each shrimp analyzed to avoid contamination and to minimize errors in the analysis). The shrimp were set in the red box with new water because the artificial sediment alters the video, creating artifacts that result in errors in the video; in addition, the movement of the TiO2 NPs in the water to the red box will result in the displacement of the nanoparticles that were set in the sediment. This acclimatization was performed in the recording room under total darkness and with no sound. After the acclimation period, the movement of the shrimp in the red tank was recorded for 5 min using a camera (Go Pro Hero 6®, GoPro, Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA). These visual patterns are analyzed from the recording and, through Loligo Systems© 5th version software (Loligo Systems, Viborg, Denmark), we quantified movement variables such as distance traveled and active time, among others (Figure 3).

2.6. Oxidative Stress Analysis

To analyze oxidative stress from 0 to 11 days after an exposure in Atya lanipes, we dissected five specimens that had been previously exposed to each TiO2 NPs concentration and the control treatments. These shrimps were dissected every two days. The shrimp exposed to the nanoparticles were not fed during the 11 days. The Atya lanipes specimens were preserved by gradually putting the shrimp at a cold temperature to decrease their biological activity without causing strong stress that would alter our results. This was performed in approximately five minutes; then, we removed the gastrointestinal tract (gut), the ventral nervous system (nerve cord), and the gills (Figure 4).
We used the Catalase (CAT) Activity Assay kit (Catalog No: MBS2540413; colorimetric method; sensitivity 0.27 U/mL) to determine the catalase enzymatic activity in each tissue sample for each period. Then, we calculated the enzymatic activity in U/mgprot with the formula CAT activity = ΔA × 32.5/1 × V × f/Cpr where 32.5 is the reciprocal of the slope, 1 is the reaction time, ΔA is the ODcontrol—ODsample, V is the volume of the sample (mL), f is the l factor of the sample before the test, and Cpr is the concentration of protein in the sample (g/L).

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Parametric statistical approach was performed because of the normality of the data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the values of the physicochemical parameters. To compare the physicochemical parameters among treatments and control, one-way ANOVA was conducted. The shrimp movement was compared among treatments by a one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests. A Probit analysis was used to compare the toxicity levels in the movements. Lastly, we used the formula suggested by the catalase kit to analyze the development of oxidative stress. All the descriptive and statistical analyses were performed using Minitab 17 Statistical Software [28].

3. Results

3.1. Specimens of Atya lanipes and Physicochemical Parameters

The sample of 25 organisms for the control and exposure groups was chosen to normalize the average shrimp size to standardize the bioassay and obtain reliable data. Cephalothorax lengths (CL) of the control and TiO2 NP-exposed groups ranged from 14.6 to 16.9 mm on average, and the post-orbital lengths (POL) were between 11.3 and 13.9 mm on average.
To maintain the internal environmental conditions of the microcosms stable during the bioassay, we measured the physicochemical parameters of the water before and after the 24 h exposure to TiO2 NPs. The temperature of the microcosm was the same as laboratory temperature which varied between 19 and 21 °C for the entire exposure period (Table 1).
The one-way ANOVA for the physicochemical properties showed no significant differences between any pre- and post-exposure time variable. No changes in pH, conductivity, or salinity measurements before and after exposure were observed. However, dissolved the oxygen measurements showed a decrease in groups exposed to TiO2 NPs; this result was not observed in the controls. An increase in dissolved oxygen concentrations was observed after 24 h of exposure. This was expected due to the presence of the constant oxygen pump in each microcosm during the entire exposure period.

3.2. Movement Assessment

The analysis of movement after the exposure to TiO2 NPs for 24 h showed significant changes leading to hypoactivity. The heat maps for the adult shrimp in the control group (0.0 mg/L of TiO2 NPs) showed a preference for the corner of the box over any other location. Their movements were limited to the corners of the box. In contrast, the exposure group showed erratic preferences and less exploration movements, especially in the TiO2 NP-exposed groups (Figure 5).
This hypoactivity characteristic in the movement assessment was statistically evaluated using one-way ANOVA with a Tukey test. During the 24 h of exposure, we observed significant differences between the exposed and control groups in the total distance moved and active time (min) (p < 0.05) (Figure 6). The average of the total distance (n = 25) traveled by the adult shrimp in the negative control group was 15,372.6 mm ±/−2581.8 mm with a minimum of 592.1 mm and a maximum of 46,759.8 mm during the 24 h of exposure. Also, for the positive controls exposed to titanium, they moved a total distance of 21,039.8 mm ± 10,070.0 mm with a range of 403.7 mm to 254,938.2 mm on average. In the second positive control (titanium ± TiO2 NPs), the average total distance was 16,525.2 mm ± 4188.4 mm with a range of 272.5 mm to 95,032.1 mm. For the different treatments of TiO2 NPs, (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/L), we observed a total distance average of 6072.7 ± 1150.8, 9644.3 ±1585.3, 5429.7 ± 626.0, and 6571.0 ± 1388.9 mm, respectively. Moreover, the total distance moved for the exposed shrimp ranged from 7.1 mm to 35,659.7 mm. The one-way ANOVA for the comparison of the total distance moved of the adult Atya lanipes shrimp in the control groups and the exposure groups showed a significant difference (F (6167) = 2.6; p < 0.05) among groups.
The active time (min) of the adult shrimp (n = 25) was 3.18 min ± 0.17 min with a minimum of 0.8 min and a maximum of 4.32 min for the negative control during the 24 h of exposure. Consequently, the active time for the positive controls was 2.74 min ± 0.22 min and 2.98 min ± 0.19 min with minimums of 0.6 and 1.51 and maximums of 4.77 and 4.84 min, respectively. The exposure groups’ (TiO2 NP suspension concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/L) average active time were 2.37 ± 0.18, 2.96 ± 0.18, 2.62 ± 0.17, and 2.54 ± 0.22 min. We observed minimums of 0.47, 0.85, 0.06, and 0.35 min with maximums of 3.90, 4.37, 4.02, and 4.26 min for the TiO2 NP suspension concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/L, respectively. The one-way ANOVA for the comparison of all TiO2 NP suspension concentrations and the positive and negative controls for the active time variable after 24 h of exposure showed a significant difference (F (6167) = 2.24; p < 0.05) between groups. The Tukey test analysis showed values of p < 0.05 for the treatment of 0.5 mg/L TiO2 NPs.
For the movement variable of active time, a Probit analysis was conducted. The lognormal probability plot at a 95% CI (−6.320–2.424) showed a coefficient of 0.20 for the different concentrations, standard error = 0.19, Z= 1.03, and a p value = 0.30. Also, the regression data showed a chi-square = 0.025, Df = 2, and Pearson = 0.99. The EC values for 50, 60, 70, and 90% of events are presented in Table 2.

3.3. Oxidative Stress Assessment

The development of oxidative stress, defined as increased catalase enzyme activity, in shrimp exposed to TiO2 NPs was compared against that of the unexposed shrimp. The branchial, nervous, and gastrointestinal tissues were obtained from five shrimp for each analysis time and for each nanoparticle suspension concentration and control group, after 24 to 264 h of exposure. The average environmental conditions of the microcosms of the shrimp used to obtain the fresh tissue samples are summarized in Table 3. During the 0–264 h exposure to TiO2 NPs, the temperature varied between 18.5 and 19.9. The pH ranged from 5.6 to 7.7. A pH below 6.0 was seen during 216 to 264 h of exposure. The conductivity varied from 0.3 to 0.5 µs. Dissolved oxygen during the exposure ranged from 7.8 to 9.2 mg/L and the salinity from 0.1 to 0.2 ppm.
The specimen sizes were determined by measuring their POL and CL lengths (Table 4). The POS lengths of the samples ranged from 10 to 17 mm and the CEF from 11 to 22 mm. The average POS lengths of the Atya lanipes specimens were 12.7 ± 1.3, 13.3 ± 1.3, 12.1 ± 1.0, 11.1 ± 0.2, 12.2 ± 1.0, 12.0 ± 1.0, and 10.8 ±/−0.2 mm for the control, 24 h, 72 h, 120 h, 168 h, 216 h, and 264 h exposure specimens, respectively, and the average CEF lengths were 14.3 ± 2.0, 16.6 ± 1.4, 14.6 ± 1.4, 13.6 ± 0.2, 14.2 ± 1.1, 14.9 ± 1.2, and 14.0 ± 0.4 mm, respectively. The POS and CEF measurements for the control and treated groups were not significant different.
Catalase activity in gastrointestinal tissues between 24 and 264 h of exposure to 10 mg/L of TiO2 NPs was accessed. The average catalytic activity of catalase in the control group was 10.97 ±/−0.2 U/mg prot. The catalase activity at each exposure time (24, 72, 120, 168, 216, and 264 h) was 0.79, 15.93, 27.94, 55.90, 19.5, and 17.77 U/mg prot, respectively. After 24 h of exposure, the catalase activity was approximately 0, which indicates a state of extreme shock and oxidative stress development in a short period. However, after 264 h of exposure, there was higher catalase enzymatic activity compared to the control group.
The analysis of catalase activity in the gill tissues showed that, after 24 h of exposure, the enzyme activity was significantly higher in the exposure group (54.38 U/mgprot) than the control group (18.09 ±/−0.2 U/mg prot). This result differed from the values we obtained in the analysis of catalase activity in the gastrointestinal tissues. In this case, the enzymatic activity was higher after 24 h but after 72 h (22.48 U/mg prot), 120 h (28.87 U/mg prot), 216 h (22.60 U/mg prot), and 264 h (20.39 U/mg prot), the enzyme activity was similar to that of the control group, except for the exposure time of 168 h (104.73 U/mg prot) when the enzyme activity was higher than that after 24 h of exposure.
In the nervous tissues from the control group, the average enzyme activity was 258.04 ±/−0.3 U/mg prot. However, the catalase activity for each exposure time was 69.44, 62.23, 31.70, 135.0, 24.01, and 147.02 U/mg prot for the exposures times of 24, 72, 120, 168, 216, and 264 h, respectively (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

This study assessed the neurotoxicity of TiO2 NPs in Atya lanipes shrimp after a 24 h acute exposure and documented the development of oxidative stress after 24 to 264 h of exposure. Currently, more studies must be carried out related to the biocompatibility and toxicity of engineering nanomaterials [29,30]. This is because their use continues to increase in many sectors globally including medicine, the food industry, and technology [31]. The biological and ecosystem interactions with nanomaterials are important in defining and preventing future impacts on ecosystems such as freshwater ones. Also, these data could help in the production, management, and future environmental regulation of engineered nanoparticles. Therefore, their possible interactions with living organisms and their toxicity must be considered before commercial use.
Most of the nano-toxicological studies have been carried out in organisms that are not exposed to nanomaterials in the aquatic environment where they naturally live [32]. However, in the communities and populations of freshwater shrimp, there has been little attention on this matter. It has been shown in studies related to other aquatic contaminants such as pesticides, that these macroinvertebrates are a good toxicological model [33]. For Atya lanipes and TiO2 NPs, their lethal and sublethal effects in larval stages [26] have been evaluated and documented. A significant hypoactivity in the movement of the larvae after acute exposure was observed. In this study, in the adult stage of the Atya lanipes shrimp, we observed that, after a 24 h acute exposure to low concentrations of TiO2 NPs, the shrimp exhibited hypoactive movements. Significantly, the heat maps documenting the “normal” movements of exploration of the Atya lanipes shrimp to be in the corners of the box rather than the center. This behavior is expected in this shrimp species since it is a standard mechanism to remain still or in the center to evade predation. Thus, when not exposed to any treatment, healthy adult shrimp showed constant movement in this pattern for more than half of the recording time. However, shrimp exposed to titanium treatment or titanium and titanium dioxide nanoparticles began to show a decrease in this pattern of exploration. In particular, the shrimp exposed to 3 mg/L TiO2 NPs did not show movement within the recording box. This is consistent with other studies that evaluated animal behavior after exposure to this nanomaterial, as neotropical tadpoles and zebrafish also presented this characteristic hypoactivity [34,35].
Scientific investigations have shown the relevance of the sublethal effects of toxicants. In the past, we referred to toxicity primarily as the ability of contaminants to cause the death of the organisms under study. Today, we know that sublethal effects can produce a great disparity in the organism’s functioning that can be extrapolated to effects on the ecosystem it is part of. Therefore, it is necessary to know the probability that a specific contaminant concentration will produce a defined effect, in this case, a sublethal effect. When carrying out the Probit analysis for the variable of active time of the shrimp, we obtained an average index of 0.14 mg/L. These data demonstrate the susceptibility of this species to an acute exposure to TiO2 NPs of only 24 h. The need to evaluate toxicological indices for sublethal effects for this species at different exposure times is evident.
In general, acute toxicity studies (≤96 h) in bacteria (V. fischeri), green algae (Pseudokirchneriella sub-capitata and Chydorus sphaericus), some crustaceans (D. magna and T. platyurus), and fish embryos (D. rerio) have shown little or no toxicity when exposed to TiO2 NPs [36,37,38]. Recent research shows that exposure to many emerging contaminants can induce biochemical responses such as oxidative stress (as an example of sublethal effects) after an acute exposure without any lethality for that same exposure time [39]. However, a recent study evaluated the nanotoxicity of TiO2 toward the freshwater shrimp Atya lanipes in their zoea larval stages and the results showed that exposure to these nanoparticles induced mortality after 48 h of exposure, with edema, less pigmentation development, and hypoactivity in the larvae [26].
The characteristic biological effect of TiO2 NPs is the development of oxidative stress. Oxidative stress occurs when reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced uncontrollably [24]. ROS are interrelated with many cellular mechanisms. They are highly reactive species which allows them to react with many biomolecules, affecting their function and/or damaging them and potentially leading to cellular apoptosis [40,41]. Fortunately, the cell has molecules and enzymes that have antioxidant roles. One of the most important is the enzyme catalase. The activity of this enzyme below or above the expected or normal values may indicate an increase in ROS and therefore the presence of oxidative stress [42]. This excess ROS in response to a xenobiotic contaminant can overwhelm the antioxidant mechanisms present in the organism [43]. This can cause oxidative damage and loss of compensatory mechanisms and a suppression of antioxidant enzymatic activities [43,44]. In this study, the catalase enzymatic activity of the groups exposed to TiO2 NPs were significantly different from that of the control group. It was shown that a 24 h acute exposure to TiO2 NPs resulted in the development of oxidative stress in gill, gastrointestinal, and nervous tissues.
The neurotoxicity after a 24 h acute exposure to TiO2 NPs and the development of oxidative stress in the freshwater shrimp species Atya lanipes was documented in this study. The toxic effects of acute exposure to this emerging aquatic pollutant was characterized by sublethal effects such as behavioral changes and induction of oxidative stress. Also, we suggest that freshwater shrimp are an excellent nano-toxicological model because of their life cycle and susceptibility to the presence of nanomaterials in their freshwater ecosystems and their ecological role in the biofiltration of natural organic particles in these ecosystems [45,46,47]. Future research should evaluate other sublethal effects such as bioaccumulation of the TiO2 NPs in Atya lanipes shrimp to understand their biological routes.
Some limitations of this study are in the assessment of the movement of the shrimp when exposed to TiO2 NPs. It was not possible to record the shrimp in the same exposure tank due to the presence of artificial sediment that was part of the microcosm and because the system that was used to analyze the behavior of the shrimp did not recognize the sediment as different from the shrimp due to their similar dark colors. It was not possible to determine “locomotion” so the “movement” of the shrimps was analyzed. Although it was recorded in a red box with red lights, which cannot be detected by these shrimps, and we promoted their normal active behavior at night, the removal of the shrimp from the exposure microcosm to fresh, clean, and oxygenated water prevented us from determining their locomotion. However, a short acclimatization period was allowed to avoid losing the effect of the TiO2 NPs in the exposure medium. All other variables were successfully controlled to obtain a movement assessment after exposure to TiO2 NPs.
This research contributes to our understanding of the nanotoxicity of TiO2 NPs and provides a starting point to determine the importance of regulating this type of nanomaterial and controlling concentrations of this contaminant in freshwater ecosystems. These results are very relevant in the scientific community because they present data for an area that has not received much attention in the field of nano-ecotoxicology and can promote research towards understanding the biocompatibility of these nanomaterials. At the same time, it shows us the need to prevent biological, ecological, and environmental impacts in the short, medium, and long term, for the purpose of conserving aquatic environments and biodiversity both in Puerto Rico and around the world.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.C.-R. and O.P.-R.; methodology, S.C.-R.; software, S.C.-R.; validation, O.P.-R.; formal analysis S.C.-R. and O.P.-R.; investigation, S.C.-R. and O.P.-R.; resources, O.P.-R.; data curation, S.C.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, S.C.-R.; writing—review and editing, O.P.-R.; visualization, S.C.-R. and O.P.-R.; supervision, O.P.-R.; project administration, S.C.-R. and O.P.-R.; funding acquisition, S.C.-R. and O.P.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Puerto Rico Center for Environmental Neuroscience (PRCEN), grant # HRD-11736019 (PRCEN2), and the Shrimp and Fish Ecology Laboratory at the University of Puerto Rico—Río Piedras Campus.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras does not requires the approval for invertebrates models.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Edgar Lozada and Fernando Villar for their help in preparing the materials used for the methodology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, X.; Li, J.; Xie, S.; Duan, P.; Zhang, H.; Feng, J.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, J.; Wang, Y. Selectivity control in photocatalytic valorization of biomass-derived platform compounds by surface engineering of titanium oxide. Chem 2020, 6, 3038–3053. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tsang, C.H.A.; Li, K.; Zeng, Y.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, T.; Zhan, Y.; Xie, R.; Leung, D.; Huang, H. Titanium oxide based photocatalytic materials development and their role of in the air pollutants degradation: Overview and forecast. Environ. Int. 2019, 125, 200–228. [Google Scholar]
  3. Skocaj, M.; Filipic, M.; Petkovic, J.; Novak, S. Titanium dioxide in our everyday life; is it safe? Radiol. Oncol. 2011, 45, 227–247. [Google Scholar]
  4. Penn, R.L.; Banfield, J.F. Morphology development and crystal growth in nanocrystalline aggregates under hydrothermal conditions: Insights from titania. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1999, 63, 1549–1557. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zaban, A.; Aruna, S.T.; Tirosh, S.; Gregg, B.A.; Mastai, Y. The effect of the preparation condition of TiO2 colloids on their surface structures. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 4130–4133. [Google Scholar]
  6. Oskam, G.; Nellore, A.; Penn, R.L.; Searson, P.C. The growth kinetics of TiO2 nanoparticles from titanium (IV) alkoxide at high water/titanium ratio. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 1734–1738. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, C.; Zhang, X. Anatase/Bronze TiO2 heterojunction: Enhanced photocatalysis and prospect in photothermal catalysis. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2020, 36, 992–999. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kawahara, T.; Konishi, Y.; Tada, H.; Tohge, N.; Nishii, J.; Ito, S. A patterned TiO2 (anatase)/TiO2 (rutile) bilayer-type photocatalyst: Effect of the anatase/rutile junction on the photocatalytic activity. Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 2935–2937. [Google Scholar]
  9. Berardinelli, A.; Parisi, F. TiO2 in the food industry and cosmetics. In Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) and Its Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 353–371. [Google Scholar]
  10. Verma, S.K. Engineered Nanomaterials and Phytonanotechnology: Challenges for Plant Sustainability; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 87. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dedman, C.J.; King, A.M.; Christie-Oleza, J.A.; Davies, G.L. Environmentally relevant concentrations of titanium dioxide nanoparticles pose negligible risk to marine microbes. Environ. Sci. Nano 2021, 8, 1236–1255. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zahra, Z.; Habib, Z.; Hyun, S.; Sajid, M. Nanowaste: Another future waste, its sources, release mechanism, and removal strategies in the environment. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2041. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kansara, K.; Bolan, S.; Radhakrishnan, D.; Palanisami, T.; Ala’a, H.; Bolan, N.; Vinu, A.; Kumar, A.; Karakoti, A. A critical review on the role of abiotic factors on the transformation, environmental identity and toxicity of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environment. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 296, 118726. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Gottschalk, F.; Sun, T.; Nowack, B. Environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials: Review of modeling and analytical studies. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 181, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Gottschalk, F.; Sonderer, T.; Scholz, R.W.; Nowack, B. Possibilities and limitations of modeling environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials by probabilistic material flow analysis. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2010, 29, 1036–1048. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Titanium-Environmental Health Criteria 24. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/37269/9241540842-eng.pdf (accessed on 16 August 2021).
  17. Benstead, J.P.; March, J.G.; Pringle, C.M. Estuarine larval development and upstream post-larval migration of freshwater shrimps in two tropical rivers of Puerto Rico. Biotropica 2000, 32, 545–548. [Google Scholar]
  18. Crowl, T.A.; McDowell, W.H.; Covich, A.P.; Johnson, S. Species-specific responses in leaf litter processing in a tropical headwater stream (Puerto Rico). Ecology 2001, 82, 775–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fang, Q.; Shi, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, B. Effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the bioavailability, metabolism, and toxicity of pentachlorophenol in zebrafish larvae. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 283, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Z.; Deng, S.; Yu, G.; Huang, J.; Lim, V.C. As (V) and as (III) removal from water by a Ce–Ti oxide adsorbent: Behavior and mechanism. Chem. Eng. 2010, 161, 106–113. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lazar, M.A.; Varghese, S.; Nair, S.S. Photocatalytic water treatment by titanium dioxide: Recent updates. J. Catal. 2012, 2, 572–601. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nel, A.; Xia, T.; Madler, L.; Li, N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. J. Sci. 2006, 311, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zhu, X.; Zhou, J.; Cai, Z. The toxicity and oxidative stress of TiO2 nanoparticles in marine abalone (Haliotis diversicolor supertexta). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 63, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Martínez, C.D.; Vargas, C.R.; Arancibia, S.R. Estrés oxidativo y neurodegeneración. Rev. Fac. Med. 2003, 46, 229–235. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hund-Rinke, K.; Simon, M. Ecotoxic effect of photocatalytic active nanoparticles (TiO2) on algae and daphnids. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2006, 13, 225–232. [Google Scholar]
  26. Cruz-Rosa, S.; Pérez-Reyes, O. Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles as Emerging Aquatic Pollutants: An Evaluation of the Nanotoxicity in the Freshwater Shrimp Larvae Atya lanipes. J. Ecol. 2023, 4, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Perez-Reyes, O.; Crowl, T.A.; Hernandez-Garcia, P.J.; Ledesma-Fuste, R.; Villar-Fornes, F.A.; Covich, A.P. Freshwater decapods of Puerto Rico: A checklist and reports of new localities. Zootaxa 2013, 3717, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Minitab 17 Statistical Software. Computer Software; Minitab, Inc.: State College, PA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jafari, S.; Mahyad, B.; Hashemzadeh, H.; Janfaza, S.; Gholikhani, T.; Tayebi, L. Biomedical applications of TiO2 nanostructures: Recent advances. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 3447–3470. [Google Scholar]
  30. Demir, E. A review on nanotoxicity and nanogenotoxicity of different shapes of nanomaterials. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2021, 41, 118–147. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lehutso, R.F.; Thwala, M. Assessment of nanopollution from commercial products in water environments. J. Nanomater. 2021, 11, 2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Garric, J.; Thybaud, E. Toxicological Models Part B: Environmental Models; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 379–396. [Google Scholar]
  33. Torres-Perez, W.X.; Perez-Reyes, O. Population Status of the Tropical Freshwater Shrimp Xiphocaris elongata in Urban and Forest Streams in Puerto Rico. Hydrobiol. J. 2023, 2, 277–288. [Google Scholar]
  34. do Amaral, D.F.; Guerra, V.; Almeida, K.L.; Signorelli, L.; Rocha, T.L.; de Melo e Silva, D. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles as a risk factor for the health of Neotropical tadpoles: A case study of Dendropsophus minutus (Anura: Hylidae). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 50515–50529. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen, T.H.; Lin, C.Y.; Tseng, M.C. Behavioral effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on larval zebrafish (Danio rerio). Mar. Pollut. 2011, 63, 303–308. [Google Scholar]
  36. Heinlaan, M.; Ivask, A.; Blinova, I.; Dubourguier, H.-C.; Kahru, A. Toxicity of nanosized and bulk ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 1308–1316. [Google Scholar]
  37. Velzeboer, I.; Hendriks, A.J.; Ragas, A.M.; Van de Meent, D. Aquatic ecotoxicity tests of some nanomaterials. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2008, 27, 1942–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Griffitt, R.J.; Luo, J.; Gao, J.; Bonzongo, J.C.; Barber, D.S. Effects of particle composition and species on toxicity of metallic nanomaterials in aquatic organisms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2008, 27, 1972–1978. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Rodriguez-Ariza, A.; Peinado, J.; Pueyo, C.; Lopez-Barea, J. Biochemical indicators of oxidative stress in fish from polluted littoral areas. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1993, 50, 2568–2573. [Google Scholar]
  40. Onose, G.; Anghelescu, A.; Blendea, D.; Ciobanu, V.; Daia, C.; Firan, F.C.; Oprea, M.; Spinu, A.; Popescu, C.; Ionescu, A.; et al. Cellular and Molecular Targets for Non-Invasive, Non-Pharmacological Therapeutic/Rehabilitative Interventions in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 907. [Google Scholar]
  41. Barnham, K.J.; Masters, C.L.; Bush, A.I. Neurodegenerative diseases and oxidative stress. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nandi, A.; Yan, L.J.; Jana, C.K.; Das, N. Role of catalase in oxidative stress-and age-associated degenerative diseases. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2019, 2019, 9613090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Shim, I.S.; Momose, Y.; Yamamoto, A.; Kim, D.W.; Usui, K. Inhibition of catalase activity by oxidative stress and its relationship to salicylic acid accumulation in plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2003, 39, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, J.F.; Shen, H.; Wang, X.R.; Wu, J.C.; Xue, Y.Q. Effects of chronic exposure of 2,4-dichlorophenol on the antioxidant system in liver of freshwater fish Carassius auratus. Chemosphere 2004, 55, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Covich, A.P.; Ewel, K.C.; Hall, R.O.; Giller, P.E.; Goedkoop, W.; Merritt, D.M. Ecosystem services provided by freshwater benthos. In Sustaining Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Soils and Sediments; Wall, D.H., Ed.; Chapter 3; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2004; pp. 45–72. [Google Scholar]
  46. Covich, A.P.; Palmer, M.A.; Crowl, T.A. The role of benthic invertebrate species in freshwater ecosystems—Zoobenthic species influence energy flows and nutrient cycling. BioScience 1999, 49, 119–127. [Google Scholar]
  47. Covich, A.P. Atyid shrimp in the headwaters of the Luquillo Mountains, Puerto Rico: Filter feeding in natural and artificial streams. Verh. Für Int. Ver. Angew. Limnol. 1988, 23, 2108–2113. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Elemental analysis through energy dispersive spectrum. The composition of the nanopowder of titanium dioxide in the analyzed sample demonstrates 61.0 wt% titanium, 36.1 wt% oxygen, 2.6 wt% carbon and 0.3 wt% sulfur.
Figure 1. Elemental analysis through energy dispersive spectrum. The composition of the nanopowder of titanium dioxide in the analyzed sample demonstrates 61.0 wt% titanium, 36.1 wt% oxygen, 2.6 wt% carbon and 0.3 wt% sulfur.
Toxics 11 00694 g001
Figure 2. Microcosm: aquarium with 1 L of water, 150 g of artificial sediment, air stone connected to the air pump, light, and one Atya lanipes adult individual.
Figure 2. Microcosm: aquarium with 1 L of water, 150 g of artificial sediment, air stone connected to the air pump, light, and one Atya lanipes adult individual.
Toxics 11 00694 g002
Figure 3. Movement analysis performed on Atya lanipes exposed to different concentrations of TiO2 NPs for 24 h. (a) The microcosm prepared for the bioassay with the Atya lanipes shrimp exposed to the nanoparticles; (b) the acclimatization process of the shrimp in the recording area inside a red plastic box; (c) the analysis of the movement in the videos using Loligo Systems® 5th version software.
Figure 3. Movement analysis performed on Atya lanipes exposed to different concentrations of TiO2 NPs for 24 h. (a) The microcosm prepared for the bioassay with the Atya lanipes shrimp exposed to the nanoparticles; (b) the acclimatization process of the shrimp in the recording area inside a red plastic box; (c) the analysis of the movement in the videos using Loligo Systems® 5th version software.
Toxics 11 00694 g003
Figure 4. Diagram of Atya lanipes shrimp and the anatomy of the dissected tissues for the oxidative stress assessment. (A) Gut, (B) gills, and (C) nerve cord.
Figure 4. Diagram of Atya lanipes shrimp and the anatomy of the dissected tissues for the oxidative stress assessment. (A) Gut, (B) gills, and (C) nerve cord.
Toxics 11 00694 g004
Figure 5. Heat maps for the adult Atya lanipes shrimp behavior in all treatment and control groups. Red areas = more time spent in that area by the shrimp. (a) Control, (b) titanium (100 micrograms/mL), (c) titanium (100 micrograms/mL) ± TiO2 NPs (3 mg/L), (d) TiO2 NPs (3 mg/L).
Figure 5. Heat maps for the adult Atya lanipes shrimp behavior in all treatment and control groups. Red areas = more time spent in that area by the shrimp. (a) Control, (b) titanium (100 micrograms/mL), (c) titanium (100 micrograms/mL) ± TiO2 NPs (3 mg/L), (d) TiO2 NPs (3 mg/L).
Toxics 11 00694 g005
Figure 6. Assessment of movement of adult Atya lanipes shrimp (n = 25 for each treatment). (a) Total distance moved (mm) and (b) active time (min) of Atya lanipes shrimp after 24 h acute exposure to different TiO2 NP suspension concentrations, titanium (100 mg/L), and TiO2 NPs + titanium (3 mg/L; 100 mg/L). * = outliers.
Figure 6. Assessment of movement of adult Atya lanipes shrimp (n = 25 for each treatment). (a) Total distance moved (mm) and (b) active time (min) of Atya lanipes shrimp after 24 h acute exposure to different TiO2 NP suspension concentrations, titanium (100 mg/L), and TiO2 NPs + titanium (3 mg/L; 100 mg/L). * = outliers.
Toxics 11 00694 g006
Figure 7. Atya lanipes catalase activity in tissues after 24 to 264 h of exposure to 10 mg/L of TiO2 NPs. The red triangle is the catalase activity in the control group. (a) Gastrointestinal tissues, (b) nervous tissues, and (c) gill tissues.
Figure 7. Atya lanipes catalase activity in tissues after 24 to 264 h of exposure to 10 mg/L of TiO2 NPs. The red triangle is the catalase activity in the control group. (a) Gastrointestinal tissues, (b) nervous tissues, and (c) gill tissues.
Toxics 11 00694 g007
Table 1. Average (±standard error, SE) of the microcosm’s chemical parameters during the assay (pre- and post-exposure to TiO2 NPs for 24 h) for each control and TiO2 NP suspension concentrations.
Table 1. Average (±standard error, SE) of the microcosm’s chemical parameters during the assay (pre- and post-exposure to TiO2 NPs for 24 h) for each control and TiO2 NP suspension concentrations.
GroupTimepH + S.E.Conductivity + S.E.
(ms)
Salinity + S.E.
(ppm)
O2, + S.E.
(mg/L)
0.0 mg/L; TiO2 NPsPre8.2 ± 0.04328.2 ± 19.00.17 ± 0.018.7 ± 0.2
Post8.2 ± 0.04341.5 ± 15.00.17 ± 0.018.8 ± 0.1
0.50 mg/L; TiO2 NPsPre7.8 ± 0.003468.7 ± 1.00.23 ± 0.0019.2 ± 0.02
Post7.7 ± 0.02436.0 ± 9.10.22 ± 0.0048.0 ± 0.1
1.0 mg/L; TiO2 NPsPre8.3 ± 0.00353.2 ± 0.80.23 ± 0.00019.3 ± 0.1
Post7.7 ± 0.02362.8 ± 2.30.22 ± 0.00018.4 ± 0.1
2.0 mg/L; TiO2 NPsPre7.8 ± 0.01469.6 ± 3.60.23 ± 0.0029.5 ± 0.1
Post7.7 ± 0.02475.2 ± 4.20.24 ± 0.0027.9 ± 0.1
3.0 mg/L; TiO2 NPsPre8.2 ± 0.04332.2 ± 17.30.17 ± 0.018.6 ± 0.1
Post8.1 ± 0.04337.4 ± 16.20.17 ± 0.018.9 ± 0.1
Titanium (100 mg/L)Pre8.2 ± 0.04332.4 ± 16.00.17 ± 0.018.6 ± 0.1
Post8.1 ± 0.04367.2 ± 21.00.18 ± 0.018.9 ± 0.1
TiO2 NPs (3 mg/L) ± Titanium (100 mg/L)Pre8.2 ± 0.04340.4 ± 21.00.17 ± 0.018.6 ± 0.1
Post8.1 ± 0.04371.8 ± 22.40.19 ± 0.018.9 ± 0.1
Table 2. Effective concentration of TiO2 NPs (mg/L) for active time variable of Atya lanipes shrimp after an acute 24 h exposure.
Table 2. Effective concentration of TiO2 NPs (mg/L) for active time variable of Atya lanipes shrimp after an acute 24 h exposure.
PointConcentration (mg/L)
24 h
EC500.143
EC600.520
EC702.073
EC8010.467
EC9098.868
Table 3. Average ± S.E. of the microcosms’ chemical parameters during the bioassay for each exposure time (10 mg/L of TiO2 NPs after 24 to 264 h).
Table 3. Average ± S.E. of the microcosms’ chemical parameters during the bioassay for each exposure time (10 mg/L of TiO2 NPs after 24 to 264 h).
Time
(Hours)
Temperature + S.E.
(°C)
pH + S.E.Conductivity + S.E.
(µs)
DO + S.E.
(mg/L)
Salinity + S.E.
(ppm)
Control group19.4 ± 0.017.0 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.018.9 ± 0.040.2 ± 0.01
2419.9 ± 0.027.1 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.0048.3 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.01
7218.5 ± 0.16.1 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.019.0 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.01
12018.8 ± 0.026.8 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.08.7 ± 0.20.2 ± 0.001
16818.6 ± 0.027.1 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.07.8 ± 0.010.2 ± 0.0
21619.2 ± 0.15.8 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.018.4 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.004
26418.7 ± 0.16.0 ± 0.040.4 ± 0.0018.9 ± 0.040.2 ± 0.01
Table 4. Average ± S.E. of the size of the dissected specimens at each exposure time presented as post-orbital and cephalothorax lengths.
Table 4. Average ± S.E. of the size of the dissected specimens at each exposure time presented as post-orbital and cephalothorax lengths.
Time of Exposure
(Hours)
POS + S.E.
(mm)
CEF + S.E.
(mm)
Control12.7 ±/−1.314.3 ±/−2.0
2413.3 ±/−1.316.6 ±/−1.4
7212.1 ±/−1.014.6 ±/−1.4
12011.1 ±/−0.213.6 ±/−0.2
16812.2 ±/−1.014.2 ±/−1.1
21612.0 ±/−1.014.9 ±/−1.2
26410.8 ±/−0.214.0 ±/−0.4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cruz-Rosa, S.; Pérez-Reyes, O. Neurotoxicity and Oxidative Stress Development in Adult Atya lanipes Shrimp Exposed to Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles. Toxics 2023, 11, 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11080694

AMA Style

Cruz-Rosa S, Pérez-Reyes O. Neurotoxicity and Oxidative Stress Development in Adult Atya lanipes Shrimp Exposed to Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles. Toxics. 2023; 11(8):694. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11080694

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cruz-Rosa, Stefani, and Omar Pérez-Reyes. 2023. "Neurotoxicity and Oxidative Stress Development in Adult Atya lanipes Shrimp Exposed to Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles" Toxics 11, no. 8: 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11080694

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop