Next Article in Journal
Learning Decision Rules for a Stochastic Multiperiod Capacitated Traveling Salesperson Problem with Irregularly Clustered Customers
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Air Traffic Controllers’ Mindfulness in Enhancing Air Traffic Safety: JDR Theory in the Saudi Arabian Aviation Context
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Designing Competitive Nanostore Networks for Enhanced Food Accessibility: Insights from a Competitive Facility Location Model

by
Agatha Clarice da Silva-Ovando
1,2,*,
Daniela Granados-Rivera
3,
Gonzalo Mejía
1,
Christopher Mejía-Argueta
4 and
Edgar Gutiérrez-Franco
4
1
Grupo de Investigación en Sistemas Logísticos, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía 250001, Colombia
2
Centro de Operaciones Logísticas, Universidad Privada Boliviana, Cochabamba 0301, Bolivia
3
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36832, USA
4
Emerging Market Economies Logistics Laboratory, MIT Center for Transportation and Logistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Logistics 2025, 9(3), 118; https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9030118
Submission received: 25 May 2025 / Revised: 6 August 2025 / Accepted: 11 August 2025 / Published: 19 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Last Mile, E-Commerce and Sales Logistics)

Abstract

Background: Access to healthy food in emerging-economy cities is challenged by last-mile constraints and poor infrastructure. Aligned with the UN SDGs on Zero Hunger and Sustainable Cities, this study examines how a strategically located nanostores network can help close these gaps while fostering local resilience. Focusing on Colombia’s Sabana Centro region, we designed a nanostore network that maximizes spatial coverage, proximity, and affordability. Methods: A competitive facility-location model combined with a discrete choice model captures consumer heterogeneity in price and location preferences. Results: Results show that locating nanostores in peripheral rather than central areas improves equity: the proposed network meets about 65,400 kg of weekly demand—51% fruit, 36% vegetables, 13% tubers—representing 16% of total regional demand and reaching underserved municipalities. This is notable given that existing nanostores already satisfy roughly 37% of household needs. Conclusions: By linking consumer behavior with sustainable spatial planning, the research offers both theoretical insight and practical tools for equitable distribution. Future work should evaluate supportive policies and supply chain innovations to secure nanostores’ long-term viability and community impact.
Keywords: competitive facility location; logit; fresh food; fruit and vegetable logistics; nanostores competitive facility location; logit; fresh food; fruit and vegetable logistics; nanostores

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

da Silva-Ovando, A.C.; Granados-Rivera, D.; Mejía, G.; Mejía-Argueta, C.; Gutiérrez-Franco, E. Designing Competitive Nanostore Networks for Enhanced Food Accessibility: Insights from a Competitive Facility Location Model. Logistics 2025, 9, 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9030118

AMA Style

da Silva-Ovando AC, Granados-Rivera D, Mejía G, Mejía-Argueta C, Gutiérrez-Franco E. Designing Competitive Nanostore Networks for Enhanced Food Accessibility: Insights from a Competitive Facility Location Model. Logistics. 2025; 9(3):118. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9030118

Chicago/Turabian Style

da Silva-Ovando, Agatha Clarice, Daniela Granados-Rivera, Gonzalo Mejía, Christopher Mejía-Argueta, and Edgar Gutiérrez-Franco. 2025. "Designing Competitive Nanostore Networks for Enhanced Food Accessibility: Insights from a Competitive Facility Location Model" Logistics 9, no. 3: 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9030118

APA Style

da Silva-Ovando, A. C., Granados-Rivera, D., Mejía, G., Mejía-Argueta, C., & Gutiérrez-Franco, E. (2025). Designing Competitive Nanostore Networks for Enhanced Food Accessibility: Insights from a Competitive Facility Location Model. Logistics, 9(3), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9030118

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop