Next Article in Journal
The Indigenous Logistics System in Africa: The Case of Nigeria, Past to Present
Next Article in Special Issue
Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Challenges to Promoting Resilience in Supply Chains Observed during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study of the Amazon Region Using the TOPSIS Technique
Previous Article in Special Issue
Selecting Partners in Strategic Alliances: An Application of the SBM DEA Model in the Vietnamese Logistics Industry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Current Trend of Industry 4.0 in Logistics and Transformation of Logistics Processes Using Digital Technologies: An Empirical Study in the Slovak Republic

Department of Production Management and Logistics, Faculty of Business Management, University of Economics in Bratislava, Dolnozemská cesta 1, 852 35 Bratislava, Slovakia
Logistics 2022, 6(4), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6040079
Submission received: 18 August 2022 / Revised: 8 November 2022 / Accepted: 10 November 2022 / Published: 15 November 2022

Abstract

:
Background: The digital transformation towards Industry 4.0 has become a necessity for businesses as it makes them more flexible, agile and responsive. Logistics is no exception, as it is constantly undergoing a significant transformation supported by revolutionary Industry 4.0 technologies that are fundamentally changing logistics processes and operations. Methods: In the construction of the paper, the following classical scientific methods were used: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, analogy, specification and comparison. Among the special scientific methods, the method of classification, concretisation, graphical methods, questionnaire survey and statistical methods were used. Results: The analysed enterprises perceive digital transformation in logistics. In the analysed enterprises in Slovakia, the Industry 4.0 strategy is implemented in logistics. Industry 4.0 in logistics has the largest representation in production logistics in each enterprise category. In implementing Industry 4.0 in logistics, enterprises confront the biggest barrier, namely, investment costs. Conclusions: Through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, several significant relationships were confirmed. The significant relationship between manufacturing logistics and selected Industry 4.0 technologies was demonstrated. The significant relationship between procurement logistics and selected Industry 4.0 technologies was also demonstrated. The statistical analysis also confirmed a significant relationship between distribution logistics and the selected Industry 4.0 technologies.

1. Introduction

The business environment is facing a dizzying transformation, rapid change and dynamic development. The logistics industry has seen many changes over the years, and as technology continues to transform the world, its impact on logistics will only expand. This is expected to cause a paradigm shift in how enterprises deliver their goods to customers quickly and efficiently. In the wake of the global pandemic, the logistics industry is under more pressure than ever to improve its processes. Everyone needs seamless logistics flows without any dangers or disruptions. Industry 4.0 is having a profound impact on the economy of every country, as it is revolutionising not only logistics, but also fundamentally changing society itself and the economy of the world. Industry 4.0 represents the use of automation and digitalisation with the application of new revolutionary technologies. Industry 4.0 is based on the interconnection of the Internet of Things with modern devices that communicate with each other through cyber-physical systems and are independent of humans. The actual implementation and subsequent use of Industry 4.0 and its technologies in the enterprise concerns not only logistics, but the entire supply chain. Industry 4.0 brings transformational changes that offer significant challenges and opportunities that affect many operational aspects of logistics.
The intention of the paper was to identify and explain the definitions and terminology that identify Industry 4.0 in logistics, based on the analysis of the literature, and also to interpret the research results that analyse the current state of the ongoing digital transformation of logistics through digital technologies in enterprises in the Slovak Republic.
Research and studies carried out in the field of digital transformation of logistics towards Logistics 4.0 still have a limited presence in the scientific sphere. Partial studies have been realised elsewhere in the world which highlight the importance of digital technologies in logistics for the sake of a continuous flow in logistics and to ensure an efficient management of logistics processes and activities with elements of artificial intelligence. It is this gap in research that has created a prerequisite for an in-depth analysis of the issue in the conditions of the Slovak Republic, where no similar research has been conducted in small, medium-sized and large enterprises through a questionnaire which has been evaluated by descriptive analysis and inferential analysis.
In the first part of the paper, a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of the views on the conceptual framework for Industry 4.0, the role of technology in the Industry 4.0 era, and the digital transformation of logistics is conducted through classical scientific methods. In the next part of the paper, the methodology of the paper is identified, which includes a review of similar research conducted in the world, thus establishing the theoretical basis for the construction of the research question and hypotheses. Subsequently, the paper conducts a descriptive analysis of the questionnaire survey and an inferential analysis of the questionnaire survey, where one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient is used. The last part of the paper is the summary of the research and identification of the research limitations.

2. Literature Overview

Digitalisation represents a complex and radical change in which enterprises need to identify and implement digital measures [1]. Digital transformation affects different dimensions of enterprises while enabling the creation of new business models through digital technologies [2]. Digital transformation focuses on creating added value for customers through smart technologies [3]. Digital technologies have changed the nature of business processes as they create new methods of management whereby the enterprise achieves a competitive advantage in a network of stakeholders [4]. In a study by Mittal et al. [5], Pfohl et al. [6] include among digital technologies: augmented reality, virtual reality, cyber-physical infrastructure, cloud computing, Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, big data analytics, additive manufacturing, smart sensors, autonomous robots and systems, and mobile technologies. Digitalisation in the logistics and supply chain management industry is increasingly inflected as it is of strategic importance to enterprises and is impacting established paradigms and business models [7,8]. Fragapane et al. [9] state that new technologies are emerging, especially in the Industry 4.0 era. These technologies include cloud operations and artificial intelligence, while creating new flexible manufacturing systems. The essence of flexibility lies in the ability of the enterprise to respond to customer demands in a timely manner while increasing productivity, without incurring excessive costs and overcommitting resources. Schniederjans et al. [10] state that digitalisation is a current trend in the logistics industry. The opportunities associated with digitalisation have enabled the entire supply chain to access, store and process large amounts of data, whereby enterprises are able to capture individualised customer data to personalise the sales process, product and service design.
We are currently in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which is characterised by the implementation of smart technologies that interconnect the physical and biological worlds with the digital world [11]. The Fourth Industrial Revolution represents the integration of manufacturing with intelligent information and communication technologies, which enable the manufacturing of products according to individual customer requirements. They also allow production in batches of one piece, but at the cost of mass-produced goods [12]. The Fourth Industrial Revolution differs from the First, Second and Third Industrial Revolutions because technology plays a much greater role in it. A significant factor is the establishment of technology policy to create an innovation ecosystem [13]. The Fourth Industrial Revolution is also defined as Industry 4.0. Its essence is based on the rapid development of digital technologies. Industry 4.0 digital technologies include the Internet of Things and cyber-physical systems [14]. The Fourth Industrial Revolution is causing changes, especially in manufacturing, as it sees a shift from mass production to personalised production. At the same time, this leads to greater flexibility in production processes while providing tools with which to more efficiently cater to individual customer needs [15]. The Fourth Industrial Revolution has seen significant advances as it embraces robotics and artificial intelligence, whereby machines do the heavy lifting and automated robots carry out constantly repetitive operations [16]. In the Fourth Industrial Revolution, a digital revolution is underway that is fundamentally changing the way individuals work and the way they use the advanced technologies that are integral to manufacturing processes [17]. Industry 4.0 is considered the Fourth Industrial Revolution. It is driven by the automatization of production processes and also by their digitalisation [18]. The Fourth Industrial Revolution enables a higher level of manufacturing efficiency through new, disruptive, smart technologies. These technologies also aim to influence the social and environmental sustainability of enterprises [19].

2.1. Conceptual Framework for Industry 4.0

Industry 4.0 represents a new level of organisation and control of the entire product life cycle value chain. It also focuses on increasingly individualised customer requirements. Industry 4.0 is a visionary yet realistic concept. Industry 4.0 encompasses the Internet of Things, smart manufacturing and cloud manufacturing [20]. Industry 4.0 encompasses an industrial revolution that is based on cyber-physical systems. Industry 4.0 envisages the interconnection of physical and digital systems, all in real time with the help of new enabling technologies. These technologies are changing the way work is done and the way work systems are used. Industry 4.0 is changing the traditional way of doing enterprise, including agility, flexibility and quality [21]. Industry 4.0 focuses on the automation and digitalisation of processes and systems and the exchange of data across the enterprise. The main goal of Industry 4.0 is to create a smart factory to increase productivity in the production system [22]. Nierostek and Horváthová [23] see the success of the enterprise and its future in the Industry 4.0 concept, as Industry 4.0 transforms enterprises and replaces old technologies and processes. Porubčinová and Fidlerová [24] assume that the essence of Industry 4.0 is in the interconnection of the different technological components, with machines, people and products interacting with each other. Mokrá et al. [25] consider it important in the current revolution to take care of efficient employees, who represent a decisive role in business processes. Industry 4.0 is a new industrialisation strategy. Within it, cyber-physical systems, big data, cloud computing, the Internet of Things and the Internet of Services are applied [26]. Industry 4.0 represents a technological revolution where industrial automatization, simulation, integration systems, IoT, cloud computing, additive manufacturing, and augmented reality have important roles to play. It is these technologies that represent the main drivers of the technological revolution [27]. With the help of Industry 4.0, it is possible to connect all elements related to manufacturing processes. The implementation of advanced technologies, techniques and management methodologies specific to Industry 4.0 covers the entire manufacturing process. The intention is to achieve the creation of a Smart Factory [28]. Fidlerová et al. [29] connect the implementation of Industry 4.0 with the introduction of innovations that aim to increase the competitiveness of sustainable business. Imran et al. [30] define Industry 4.0 as the increasing digitalisation and automatization of manufacturing. At the same time, digital value chains are being created that communicate between products, business partners and their environment. Industry 4.0 is creating smart factories that combine physical and cyber technologies. At the same time, technologies are becoming more complex and precise, making manufacturing more efficient, controllable, quality, and transparent [31]. Industry 4.0 is associated with disruptive innovation [32]. These innovations have an important impact on radical changes in technological processes. In order to face the digital transformation, the enterprise has to deal with many challenges, which include fragmentation of the value chain, integration of production systems, and globalisation and decentralisation of manufacturing [33,34,35]. Industry 4.0 represents the era of digitalisation, where there are digital business models, digital environments, digital production systems and digital machines. In digitalisation, physical flows are implemented and continuously mapped on digital platforms. The higher level of automatization is represented by systems and software that enable communication with intelligent information and communication technologies. This ensures a digital factory not only internally, but also externally as it reaches all elements of the value chain [36].

2.2. Role of Technologies in the Age of Industry 4.0

The pillars of Industry 4.0 are an essential part of this. The core pillars of Industry 4.0 include: the Industrial Internet of Things, cyber-physical systems, vertical and horizontal software integration, augmented reality, predictive techniques, autonomous robots, additive technologies, mass individualisation, innovative methods for collecting and processing big data, and many other real-time data analytics techniques that exploit the potential of cloud computing [37]. Tutak and Brodny [38], Pivoto et al. [39], and Sony and Naik [40] agree on the nine core technology pillars of Industry 4.0. According to the authors, it is these nine pillars that significantly influence the activities in the industry and service sector. These pillars include optimisation and simulation, cloud technologies, virtual and augmented reality, big data analytics, horizontal and vertical system integration, industrial IoT, autonomous robots, incremental technologies, and cybersecurity. The integration of Industry 4.0 technologies into business processes has sparked the transformation of tangible objects into intangible ones. This transformation has made objects more portable and accessible [41]. Industry 4.0 includes artificial intelligence, Internet of Things, augmented reality, additive manufacturing, advanced robotics and cobots, human-machine interfaces, machine-to-machine communication, blockchain, data stored in the cloud, the Internet of Services, autonomous vehicles, and drones [42]. The core technologies of Industry 4.0 include: simulation, industrial IoT, big data analytics, cloud technologies, additive manufacturing, autonomous robots, augmented reality, cybersecurity, and business intelligence [43]. The key elements of Industry 4.0 that are creating disruptive change include: advanced simulation, nanotechnology, biotechnology, neurotechnology, artificial intelligence, Internet of Things, cloud computing, big data, industrial IoT, smart factory and intelligent factory, autonomous robots, cybersecurity, additive manufacturing, virtual reality, smart sensors, drones, vertical and horizontal systems integration, renewable energy and advanced energy storage, machine-to-machine communication, 5G network, quantum computing, mobile devices, predictive maintenance, advanced human-machine interface, and digital twin [44]. The key pillar of Industry 4.0 is new technologies that are fundamentally changing business processes. Industry 4.0 technologies include: simulation, nanotechnology, cloud computing, virtual reality, 3D printing, big data analytics, radio frequency identification, Internet of Things, cybersecurity, machine-to-machine communication, robots, and drones [45,46,47]. The main advantage of Industry 4.0 technologies is to ensure the implementation of different capabilities depending on the needs of the production system. The level of complexity of the decisions to be made, the amount of information to be processed or the autonomy of the systems to be able to apply decisions without human intervention are taken into account. Industry 4.0 and related technologies are increasingly presented as essential for the increase of productivity in manufacturing enterprises. By focusing on instantaneous communication between machines and objects, it is possible to make manufacturing systems more responsive to product changes and better able to react to unpredictable events [48].

2.3. Digital Transformation of Logistics-Logistics 4.0

In order for logistics systems to respond flexibly to the dynamic changes in the globalised international environment, it is essential that logistics systems become more and more efficient, flexible and secure [49]. Enterprises can achieve this by implementing Industry 4.0 technologies in logistics. The challenge in modern logistics is also supply chain management is the automation of supply chain processes [50]. It is the automation of logistics processes that is still one of the most pressing needs and to manage the current crisis that is also affecting logistics [51]. The trend towards digitalisation has made Industry 4.0 inevitable and is playing a decisive role in the development of new logistics and manufacturing concepts [52]. The ongoing digital transformation of logistics, including the whole supply chain, is a source of competitive advantage [53]. With the support of autonomous and digital Industry 4.0 technologies, faster delivery and minimised logistics costs will be achieved in logistics [54]. With the concept of Industry 4.0, the terms smart logistics and Logistics 4.0 are inflected in logistics. These terms are associated with the Industry 4.0 phenomenon in logistics and describe the interconnection of logistics with the Internet of Things and cyber-physical systems. The main aim of Logistics 4.0 is to speed up logistics processes by sharing information in real time and minimising inaccuracies. The benefits of Logistics 4.0 in the enterprise include: simplified monitoring of logistics systems, increased environmental considerateness, increased logistics awareness, minimised waste of costs, time and energy, creation of new business models, creation of flexible logistics processes that respond promptly to consumer demands [55]. The benefits of Logistics 4.0 are especially noticeable in resource planning, transportation management systems, warehouse management systems, and intelligent transportation systems superstructure [56].
Logistics processes themselves are also under the influence of Logistics 4.0. The logistics paths most affected by the Fourth Industrial Revolution are procurement, inventory management, warehousing and transport. The definition of these logistics processes is identified in Table 1.
Jeschke [61] defines Logistics 4.0 as the application of smart technologies within Industry 4.0. These technologies include advanced robotics, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, big data and the Internet of Things. Amr et al. [62] says that Logistics 4.0 is a new technological direction that combines technologies with the intention of making the entire supply chain more efficient and effective, while changing the focus of enterprises on value chains, maximising value for consumers and customers by increasing competitiveness through digitalisation. Logistics 4.0 is a combination of smart technologies whose applications are in the areas of inventory management, warehousing, distribution and transportation [63]. Logistics 4.0 represents intelligent logistics, which includes connectivity and integration, real-time localisation, automated data collection and processing, automatic identification, and business and analytical services. Through the new generation technologies, logistics processes are being industrialised through rationalisation and standardisation [64]. Strandhagen et al. [65] defined Logistics 4.0 through Industry 4.0 technologies through which the need for warehousing is reduced, leading to optimised inventory management, information exchange and no information disruptions. Logistics 4.0 is a strategic logistics system that is characterised by flexibility, perfect adaptability to the market, minimisation of costs and meeting customer requirements [66]. Logistics 4.0 consists of autonomous subsystems that interact with each other in order to achieve individual goals and to ensure the efficient behaviour of individual entities [67]. Logistics 4.0 includes networking and integration, data collection and processing, self-organization, decentralisation and independence [68].
Logistics 4.0 mainly uses the following Industry 4.0 technologies: virtual reality and augmented reality, big data, Internet of Things, advanced simulation, artificial intelligence, smart sensors and autonomous robots. These technologies perform an indispensable role in procurement logistics, production logistics and distribution logistics in the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The characteristics of these technologies are presented in Table 2.

3. Research Methodology

The main objective of the present paper was to determine and explicate the definitions and terminology that identify Industry 4.0 in logistics based on a literature analysis and to interpret the research results that analyse the current state of the ongoing digital transformation of logistics through digital technologies in enterprises in Slovakia. In providing a comprehensive view of the issue, it was necessary to define the partial objectives of the paper, which included:
  • The comparative overview of views on a conceptual framework for Industry 4.0,
  • The comparative analysis of views on the role of technology in the age of Industry 4.0,
  • The comparative review of views on the digital transformation of logistics-Logistics 4.0,
  • Descriptive analysis of the questionnaire survey,
  • Inferential analysis of the questionnaire survey,
  • Summarisation of the research issues.

3.1. Description of Collection Tool

The research and studies conducted on the digital transformation of logistics towards Logistics 4.0 still have a limited presence in the scientific sphere. It is this research gap that has created the prerequisite for an in-depth analysis of the topic at hand through statistical induction. Perona et al. [76] conducted research in 91 Italian manufacturing enterprises. The results of the research showed that the implementation of Logistics 4.0 is still immature but has a huge potential. Awareness that the goal of Logistics 4.0 is the harmonious and integrated implementation of digital technologies to support logistics processes has not yet spread in Italian manufacturing enterprises. Nobrega et al. [77] investigated the evolution of Logistics 4.0 in Brazilian enterprises. The authors consider that Logistics 4.0 will represent a major disruptive transformation. Technological advances will allow the entire supply chain to be connected and information will be able to be exchanged in real time, providing greater control over information and better decision making. In addition, Brazilian enterprises consider that the implementation of Logistics 4.0 will also increase identification capabilities and provide better commercial demand forecasting, thereby increasing the flexibility of enterprises. Batz et al. [78] conducted research to determine whether Polish enterprises are aware of the Logistics 4.0 concept and whether they use solutions commonly described as Logistics 4.0 solutions. Based on the results of the research conducted in logistics and manufacturing enterprises in Poland, 33% of the surveyed enterprises are aware of the Logistics 4.0 concept, 50% of the enterprises are aware of the big data concept, 83% of the enterprises want to apply automated data exchange systems and are willing to automate their processes as well as to introduce partial robotisation of their processes. Group-IPS [79] analyses the degree of digitalisation of the supply chain in Spanish enterprises. The research shows that 65% of Spanish enterprises have limitations in the visibility of their supply chain. The main priorities of the surveyed enterprises are the digitalisation of their logistics planning, production and execution. The Industry 4.0 technologies considered most useful in logistics are Internet of Things, big data analytics and artificial intelligence. Correa et al. [80] investigated in 108 Brazilian enterprises the level of corporate interest in investing in IoT and big data analytics of Industry 4.0 technologies oriented towards logistics innovation. More than half of the respondent enterprises are already investing in these two technologies. Enterprises intend to use big data analytics to reduce operational costs, predict consumer behaviour and forecasting. The main reason for adopting IoT and big data analytics is to be more competitive. Alamsjah and Yunus [81] investigated the key determinants of supply chain 4.0 maturity in 154 Indonesian manufacturing enterprises. The analysis revealed that supply chain ambidexterity with an emphasis on innovation positively influences firm agility and the level of supply chain 4.0 maturity. Dallasega et al. [82] investigated the level of maturity of Logistics 4.0 implementation in manufacturing enterprises based in Central Europe, the Northeastern United States, and Northern Thailand. Based on 239 responses, they concluded that Logistics 4.0 is a relatively new area of research that requires further development through empirical validation. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is no empirically validated multidimensional construct to measure Logistics 4.0 in manufacturing enterprises. Woschank and Dallasega [83] conducted research between December 2020 and January 2021 that was distributed in Central Europe. The results of the research confirmed the impact of Logistics 4.0 on the performance of manufacturing enterprises. The results also confirmed that smart and lean supply chains have a significant impact on logistics performance indicators.
Based on the conceptual framework of the paper, the foreign research realised in the period 2019–2022 and the author’s previous research (Richnák [84] investigated Industry 4.0 in the metallurgical industry in Slovakia; Richnák [85] evaluated the current situation in the area of Industry 4.0 in logistics in the machinery and equipment industry in Slovakia; Richnák [86] investigated the rate of innovation adoption in enterprises in Slovakia in the era of Industry 4.0), in the years 2021–2022, the research question was conceived and subsequently the null and the alternative hypothesis was formulated for it:
Research Question (RQ): How is Industry 4.0 affecting corporate logistics?
Hypothesis 1 (H1).
We assume that there is no significant relationship between production logistics and selected Industry 4.0 technologies.
Hypothesis 1 (H1a).
We assume that there is a significant relationship between production logistics and selected Industry 4.0 technologies.
Hypothesis 2 (H2).
We assume that there is no significant relationship between procurement logistics and selected Industry 4.0 technologies.
Hypothesis 2 (H2a).
We assume that there is a significant relationship between procurement logistics and selected Industry 4.0 technologies.
Hypothesis 3 (H3).
We assume that there is no significant relationship between distribution logistics and selected Industry 4.0 technologies.
Hypothesis 3 (H3a).
We assume that there is a significant relationship between distribution logistics and selected Industry 4.0 technologies.
Hypothesis 4 (H4).
We assume that there is no significant relationship between Industry 4.0 and logistics processes.
Hypothesis 4 (H4a).
We assume that there is a significant relationship between Industry 4.0 and logistics processes.
In the construction of the paper, the following classical scientific methods were used: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, analogy, specification, and comparison. Among the special scientific methods, the method of classification, concretisation, graphical methods, questionnaire survey, and statistical methods were used.
Data collection through a questionnaire survey was conducted between November 2021 and May 2022 through an electronic standardized questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed to managers of small, medium-sized and large enterprises in Slovakia through e-mail addresses. The questionnaire was structured into several areas. The first area concentrated on the identification of the respondents and then other parts of the questionnaire were related to digital transformation in logistics. The construction of the questions in the questionnaire used identification questions and closed questions where the respondent had a choice of options or selection through a numerical scale from 0–6. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was used in the analysis. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were applied in the statistical analysis.

3.2. Research Design

The research design was a process that consisted of several successive phases. Their development is illustrated in Figure 1 and represents the process of realising the research problem.

3.3. Descriptions of Research Participants

The object of the research were enterprises located in the Slovak Republic. There were 144 relevant respondents whose answers were included in the analysis. Enterprises were categorised according to size on the basis of the European Commission 2003/361/EC, which defines the small enterprise (10–49 employees), the medium-sized enterprise (50–249 employees) and the large enterprise (≥250 employees). Medium-sized enterprises from industry in Slovakia participated in the survey in the highest proportion (46.5%; N = 67). Large enterprises were represented with the second largest share (44.4%; N = 64). The smallest proportion (9%; N = 13) was from the participation of small enterprises. The summarised data is presented in Figure 2. For the purpose of the analysis conducted, we can conclude that the sample of respondents represented is at a representative level, as medium-sized and large enterprises from Slovak industry are dominant.
The choropleth map is a graphical representation of the relative quantitative data obtained by the research in the map of Slovakia. The choropleth map is illustrated in Figure 3. By using the most commonly used expression method of thematic cartography, we can monitor the aperiodic representation of individual regions. Coloured shades of yellow-brown indicate identical representation of respondents in the Bratislava and Trnava Regions (20.1%; N = 29). Western Slovakia was represented by the Trenčín Region (17.4%; N = 25) and the Nitra Region (11.1%; N = 16). Central Slovakia was represented by the Žilina Region (9.7%; N = 14) and the Banská Bystrica Region (7.6%; N = 11). Eastern Slovakia, represented by the Prešov Region (8.3%; N = 12) and the Košice Region (5.6%; N = 8), featured the lowest participation.
In the research, we wanted to know in which industrial sector the analysed enterprise operates. Figure 4 provides a representation of the different industrial sectors. The largest part of the research sample was the mechanical industry with a share of 19.4% (28 enterprises). The automotive industry and the electrical engineering industry also received a high representation in the research sample, with an identical share of 17.4% (25 enterprises). This was followed by the food industry (15.3%; N = 22), extractive industry (9.7%; N = 14); timber and wood processing industry (6.9%; N = 10), and light industry (5.6%, N = 8). Enterprises from the construction industry and the chemical and pharmaceutical industry (3.5%; N = 5) and the glass industry (1.4%; N = 2) were the least represented in the research.
In identifying the research sample, the territorial location of the enterprises was also included in the analysis. The largest representation of enterprises was recorded in transnational markets (76.0%; N = 110). Enterprises operating in national markets occupied the second position (15.3%; N = 22). The lowest shares were observed for enterprises that operate in regional markets (5.6%; N = 8) and local markets (2.8%; N = 4). The results of the descriptive analysis are presented in Figure 5.

4. Results Analysis and Discussion

4.1. Evaluation of Descriptive Analysis

Through descriptive analysis, the following selected results were evaluated, results which dealt with the theme of digitalisation and Industry 4.0 in the logistics of enterprises in Slovakia.
The data analysed is segmented by the size of the participating enterprises. Table 3 clearly summarises the results of the analysis, based on which we can see that 89.1% (N = 57) of large enterprises perceive digital transformation in logistics. Also 77.6% (N = 52) of medium-sized enterprises in Slovakia reflect the ongoing digital transformation in logistics. The interesting findings are that also in the small enterprise category (69.2%, N = 9) there are interests that dominate the digital transformation in logistics.
Industry 4.0 in logistics requires having the logistics strategy that deals with the digital transformation of logistics processes and logistics activities. In the analysed enterprises in Slovakia, the Industry 4.0 strategy is implemented in logistics. Large enterprises have it at this level with a share of 59.4% (N = 38). Medium-sized enterprises have the highest share (47.8%, N = 32) of Industry 4.0 strategy in logistics in implementation. Also, small enterprises in Slovakia have the highest share (76.9%, N = 10) of implementation for the Industry 4.0 strategy in logistics. The interesting finding is that there is no Industry 4.0 strategy in only 1.6% (N = 1) of large enterprises and 6% (N = 4) of medium-sized enterprises. Table 4 summarises the results of the analysis.
When implementing Industry 4.0 in logistics, it is important to recognise in which type of logistics it has the largest participation. Based on the results of Table 5, we can determine that Industry 4.0 in logistics has the largest representation in production logistics in each category of enterprise. In large enterprises it is represented with a share of 79.7% (N = 51), in medium-sized enterprises it is represented with a share of 80.6% (N = 54) and in small enterprises it is represented with a share of 38.5% (N = 5). The interesting finding is the fact that procurement logistics reached an identical number (N = 4) in each category of enterprise. On a small scale, large, medium-sized and small enterprises in Slovakia are implementing Industry 4.0 in distribution logistics.
When implementing Industry 4.0 in logistics, enterprises face barriers to its implementation. The selected barriers that were most inflected in the research have been summarised in Table 6. From the responses, we determined that within large enterprises, the biggest barrier was the investment cost in implementing Industry 4.0 in logistics (59.4%, N = 38). Also, both medium-sized enterprises (88.1%, N = 59) and small enterprises (84.6%, N = 11) consider investment costs as the biggest barrier. New supply chain upgrading will also be a major challenge for large enterprises (37.5%, N = 24). Enterprises in Slovakia are not concerned about the shortage of skilled labour. Only one large enterprise (1.6%) considers it as a barrier.

4.2. Evaluation of Inferential Analysis

The studied topic was also analysed by using inferential statistics. One-way analysis of variance ANOVA and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were used to evaluate the null and alternative hypotheses.

Research Question (RQ): How Is Industry 4.0 Affecting Corporate Logistics?

The null hypothesis (H1) and alternative hypothesis (H1a) were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results of the testing are presented in Table 7. Considering the value of statistical significance, there is a significant relationship between the production logistics and the selected technologies in Industry 4.0: Virtual reality and Augmented reality (F(6, 137) = 2.628, p = 0.019; Drones F(6, 137) = 3.257, p = 0.005; Big Data (F(6, 137) = 2.498, p = 0.025; 5G network (F(6, 137) = 2.567, p = 0.022; Additive manufacturing F(6, 137) = 5.053, p = 0.000; Internet of Things (F(6, 137) = 4.180, p = 0.001; Advanced simulation F(6, 137) = 3.161, p = 0.006; Artificial intelligence F(6, 137) = 2.818, p = 0.013; Smart sensors F(6, 137) = 2.962, p = 0.009; Autonomous robots F(6, 137) = 3.823, p = 0.001; Cloud computing F(6, 137) = 3.477, p = 0.003; Cyber-physical systems F(6, 137) = 2.690, p = 0.017.
The null hypothesis (H2) and alternative hypothesis (H2a) were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results of the testing are presented in Table 8. With respect to the value of statistical significance, there is a significant relationship between procurement logistics and the selected Industry 4.0 technologies: Big Data (F(6, 137) = 3.282, p = 0.005; 5G network (F(6, 137) = 3.537, p = 0.003; Internet of Things (F(6, 137) = 6.247, p = 0.000; Advanced simulation F(6, 137) = 2.661, p = 0.018; Artificial intelligence F(6, 137) = 4.760, p = 0.000; Smart sensors F(6, 137) = 4.341, p = 0.000; Cloud computing F(6, 137) = 3.705, p = 0.002.
The relationship between distribution logistics and Industry 4.0 technologies: Virtual reality and Augmented reality (F(6, 137) = 0.726, p = 0.630; Drones F(6, 137) = 1.190, p = 0.315; Additive manufacturing F(6, 137) = 1.298, p = 0.262; Autonomous robots F(6, 137) = 1.975, p = 0.073; Cyber-physical systems F(6, 137) = 0.541, p = 0.776 was non-significant.
The null hypothesis (H3) and alternative hypothesis (H3a) were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results of the testing are presented in Table 9. With respect to the value of statistical significance, there is a significant relationship between distribution logistics and the selected Industry 4.0 technologies: Big Data (F(6, 137) = 2.774, p = 0.014; 5G network (F(6, 137) = 2.164, p = 0.050; Internet of Things (F(6, 137) = 4.439, p = 0.000; Advanced simulation F(6, 137) = 3.140, p = 0.006; Artificial intelligence F(6, 137) = 2.703, p = 0.016; Smart sensors F(6, 137) = 3.041, p = 0.008; Autonomous robots F(6, 137) = 3.265, p = 0.005; Cloud computing F(6, 137) = 2.197, p = 0.047.
The relationship between procurement logistics and Industry 4.0 technologies: Virtual reality and Augmented reality (F(6, 137) = 1.135, p = 0.345; Drones F(6, 137) = 1.701, p = 0.125; Additive manufacturing F(6, 137) = 1.490, p = 0.186; Cyber-physical systems F(6, 137) = 0.712, p = 0.641 was non-significant.
The null hypothesis (H4) and the alternative hypothesis (H4a) were tested using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Based on the evaluation of the coefficient, we conclude that a positively significant relationship emerged between Industry 4. 0 and logistics processes: customer service (r = 0.333; p = 0.000), inventory management (r = 0.328; p = 0.000), logistics communication (r = 0.341; p = 0.000), material handling (r = 0.197; p = 0.018), order processing (r = 0.275; p = 0.001), packaging (r = 0.168; p = 0.044), procurement/purchasing (r = 0.172; p = 0.039), transport and transportation (r = 0.266; p = 0.001), warehousing (r = 0.353; p = 0.000). The results indicate that we are inclined towards the alternative hypothesis. The values are shown in Table 10.

5. Conclusions

Digital transformation towards Industry 4.0 has become a necessity for enterprises, as it makes them more flexible, agile and responsive in the current uncompromising competitive environment. Logistics is no exception, as it is constantly undergoing a dramatic transformation with the support of disruptive Industry 4.0 technologies that are fundamentally changing logistics processes and activities.
The aim of the paper was to identify the current state of digital transformation in the form of Industry 4.0 and its technologies in the logistics of enterprises in Slovakia. The object of the quantitative research, which was realised in the form of an electronic questionnaire, were small, medium-sized and large enterprises located in the Slovak Republic. Medium-sized enterprises from the industry in Slovakia participated in the survey with the largest share. The largest part of the research sample was represented by the mechanical industry. The largest representation of enterprises was recorded in the scope of activities on transnational markets. The analysed enterprises perceive digital transformation in logistics. In the analysed enterprises in Slovakia, the Industry 4.0 strategy is implemented in logistics. Industry 4.0 in logistics has the largest representation in production logistics in each enterprise category. In implementing Industry 4.0 in logistics, enterprises confront the biggest barrier, namely investment costs.
Currently, there is no uniform checklist of Industry 4.0 technologies that are used in logistics. Their number and list varies depending on the author’s perspective or the capabilities of the enterprise. Some Industry 4.0 technologies are used in small enterprises, and others in large enterprises; other technologies are used primarily in the automotive industry, while others are used in the textile industry. The view of Industry 4.0 technologies in logistics has been compiled by comparing a large number of available sources. Based on the theoretical part of the paper, the following Industry 4.0 technologies have been defined: Virtual reality and Augmented reality, Drones, Big Data, 5G network, Additive manufacturing, Internet of Things, Advanced simulation, Artificial intelligence, Smart sensors, Autonomous robots, Cloud computing, and Cyber-physical systems. These Industry 4.0 technologies were analysed in small, medium-sized and large enterprises in the Slovak Republic. On the basis of inferential analysis, we conclude that in logistics there is a different use of Industry 4.0 technologies according to the type of logistics. It is not possible to compile a unified checklist of Industry 4.0 technologies in logistics. This is also identified by the evaluated hypotheses, which showed dependent relationships between different types of logistics and Industry 4.0 technologies.
Several significant relationships were confirmed through statistical tests. The significant relationship between production logistics and Industry 4.0 technologies, such as Virtual reality and Augmented reality, Drones, Big Data, 5G network, Additive manufacturing, Internet of Things, Advanced simulation, Artificial intelligence, Smart sensors, Autonomous robots, Cloud computing, and Cyber-physical systems was demonstrated. The significant relationships between procurement logistics and selected Industry 4.0 technologies, such as Big Data, 5G network, Internet of Things, Advanced simulation, Artificial intelligence, Smart sensors, and Cloud computing was also demonstrated. Statistical analysis also confirmed a significant relationship between distribution logistics and selected Industry 4.0 technologies: Big Data, 5G network, Internet of Things, Advanced simulation, Artificial intelligence, Smart sensors, Autonomous robots, Cloud computing. The results of the inferential analysis showed a positively significant relationship emerged between Industry 4.0 and logistics processes.
Research and studies on digitalisation of logistics transformation, digital technologies, Industry 4.0 in logistics, and Logistics 4.0 are constantly evolving and are relevant in the light of the ongoing industrial revolution. Also, research and studies on this issue bring new possibilities and opportunities for enterprises, as there are still many gaps at the enterprise level that have not yet been addressed in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The conducted research of the author in the presented article from the digital transformation of logistics in the conditions of enterprises in Slovakia is one of them. This research is exceptional and unique as no similar research has been published by Slovak authors yet. The validity and significance of the conducted research is confirmed by similar research conducted elsewhere in the world, which were performed in the range of 2019–2022.

5.1. Research Implications

There is currently no uniform strategy or measures for the implementation of Industry 4.0 in Slovakia. It is the results of the quantitative research conducted in 144 enterprises in Slovakia that creates the potential for their use by the Ministry of Economy of the Slovak Republic, which represents the smart industry in Slovakia. Also, the conducted research can be helpful for the Slovak Investment and Trade Development Agency, which is a state agency of the Ministry of Economy of the Slovak Republic. The Slovak Investment and Trade Development Agency can use the research to create studies and documents for Slovak enterprises, which will better ensure the transfer of the most modern innovative technologies into production practice. At the same time, the investigation of Industry 4.0 in logistics in Slovakia is an unexplored research area, which has opened up further possibilities for further research.
In future research, the authors plan to conduct research that would be extended to enterprises in the Visegrad Group countries. These countries (Slovak Republic, Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary) are developing their economies, infrastructure, energy, digitalisation and innovation with the aim of mutual cooperation and transformation of their economies. Also, the author wants to extend the research to include sustainable development goals in the context of the Industry 5.0 concept, as he believes that sustainability will have a significant impact not only on logistics processes and activities, but on the entire supply chain.

5.2. Limitations

The processed research results have several limitations. The first limitation relates to the research sample, which concentrates only on enterprises that are based in the Slovak Republic. Subsequent research would include enterprises from the Visegrad Group countries in order to give the study an international context. The second limitation of the research is the targeting of only one business area-logistics. In further research it would be appropriate to compare the impact of the ongoing industrial revolution in manufacturing as well. As manufacturing and logistics form one inherent corporate unit that intersects with many business processes and activities. The third limitation of the research was the ongoing global pandemic, which reduced the resulting number of respondents who participated in the research due to national lockdowns. For this reason, it would be interesting to conduct future longitudinal research to compare the results of research conducted during and after the pandemic.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant—VEGA, No. 1/0375/20—New dimension in the development of production management and logistics under the influence of Industry 4.0 in enterprises in Slovakia.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic and the Slovak Academy of Sciences (VEGA) Project No. 1/0375/20—“New dimension in the development of production management and logistics under the influence of Industry 4.0 in enterprises in Slovakia”.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bohsali, S.; Samad, R.A. Preparing for the Digital Era: The State of Digitalization in GCC Businesses. Available online: https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/reports/preparingdigital-era (accessed on 10 June 2022).
  2. Nwaiwu, F. Review and Comparison of Conceptual Frameworks on Digital Business Transformation. J. Compet. 2018, 10, 86–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Rymaszewska, A.; Helo, P.; Gunasekaran, A. IoT powered servitization of manufacturing—An exploratory case study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017, 192, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brunswicker, S.; Bertino, E.; Matei, S. Big Data for Open Digital Innovation—A Research Roadmap. Big Data Res. 2015, 2, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mittal, S.; Khan, M.A.; Romero, D.; Wuest, T. Smart manufacturing: Characteristics, technologies and enabling factors. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2017, 233, 1342–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pfohl, H.-C.; Yahsi, B.; Kuznaz, T. The impact of Industry 4.0 on the Supply Chain. In Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistic (HICL), Berlin, Germany, 20 August 2015; pp. 32–58. [Google Scholar]
  7. Barrett, M.; Davidson, E.; Prabhu, J.; Vargo, S.L. Service Innovation in the Digital Age: Key Contributions and Future Directions. MIS Q. 2015, 39, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cichosz, M.; Wallenburg, C.M.; Knemeyer, A.M. Digital transformation at logistics service providers: Barriers, success factors and leading practices. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2020, 31, 209–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fragapane, G.; Ivanov, D.; Peron, M.; Sgarbossa, F.; Strandhagen, J.O. Increasing flexibility and productivity in Industry 4.0 production networks with autonomous mobile robots and smart intralogistics. Ann. Oper. Res. 2020, 308, 125–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Schniederjans, D.G.; Curado, C.; Khalajhedayati, M. Supply chain digitisation trends: An integration of knowledge management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 220, 107439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rotatori, D.; Lee, E.J.; Sleeva, S. The evolution of the workforce during the fourth industrial revolution. Hum. Resour. Dev. Int. 2020, 24, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ustundag, A.; Cevikcan, E. Industry 4.0: Managing the Digital Transformation; Springer International: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  13. Schäfer, M. The fourth industrial revolution: How the EU can lead it. Eur. View 2018, 17, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Suleiman, Z.; Shaikholla, S.; Dikhanbayeva, D.; Shehab, E.; Turkyilmaz, A. Industry 4.0: Clustering of concepts and characteristics. Cogent Eng. 2022, 9, 2034264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nosalska, K.; Mazurek, G. Marketing principles for Industry 4.0—A conceptual framework. Eng. Manag. Prod. Serv. 2019, 11, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Bláha, J.; Klimsza, L.; Lokaj, A.; Nierostek, L. Multidimensional Analysis of Ethical Leadership for Business Development. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 10, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ghobakhloo, M. Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 119869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bauer, W.; Schlund, S.; Hornung, T.; Schuler, S. Digitalization of Industrial Value Chains—A Review and Evaluation of Existing Use Cases of Industry 4.0 in Germany. Logforum 2018, 14, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bai, C.; Dallasega, P.; Orzes, G.; Sarkis, J. Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 229, 107776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vaidya, S.; Ambad, P.; Bhosle, S. Industry 4.0—A Glimpse. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 20, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lennon Olsen, T.; Tomlin, B. Industry 4.0: Opportunities and Challenges for Operations Management. SSRN Electron. J. 2019, 22, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abdirad, M.; Krishnan, K. Industry 4.0 in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review. Eng. Manag. J. 2020, 33, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nierostek, L.; Horváthová, P. Importance of Intellectual Capital and Business Education as Global Topic in Development of Company International Business from the Perspective of Company Management. SHS Web Conf. 2021, 92, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Porubčinová, M.; Fidlerová, H. Determinants of Industry 4.0 Technology Adaption and Human—Robot Collaboration. Res. Pap. Fac. Mater. Sci. Technol. Slovak Univ. Technol. 2020, 28, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mokrá, K.; Horváthová, P.; Kauerová, L. The level of health and safety promotion in workplaces of Czech family-owned manufacturing firms: A case study. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. Comenius Univ. Bratisl. Fac. Manag. 2021, 24, 12–27. [Google Scholar]
  26. Adamson, G.; Wang, L.; Moore, P. Feature-based control and information framework for adaptive and distributed manufacturing in cyber physical systems. J. Manuf. Syst. 2017, 43, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Godinho Filho, M.; Roubaud, D. Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations. Ann. Oper. Res. 2018, 270, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Grabowska, S. Smart Factories in the Age of Industry 4.0. Manag. Syst. Prod. Eng. 2020, 28, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fidlerová, H.; Stareček, A.; Vraňaková, N.; Bulut, C.; Keaney, M. Sustainable Entrepreneurship for Business Opportunity Recognition: Analysis of an Awareness Questionnaire among Organisations. Energies 2022, 15, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Imran, M.; Hameed, W.U.; Haque, A.u. Influence of Industry 4.0 on the Production and Service Sectors in Pakistan: Evidence from Textile and Logistics Industries. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kalsoom, T.; Ramzan, N.; Ahmed, S.; Ur-Rehman, M. Advances in Sensor Technologies in the Era of Smart Factory and Industry 4.0. Sensors 2020, 20, 6783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bigliardi, B.; Bottani, E.; Casella, G. Enabling technologies, application areas and impact of industry 4.0: A bibliographic analysis. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 42, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ibarra, D.; Ganzarain, J.; Igartua, J.I. Business model innovation through Industry 4.0: A review. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 22, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. De Giovanni, P.; Cariola, A. Process innovation through industry 4.0 technologies, lean practices and green supply chains. Res. Transp. Econ. 2020, 90, 100869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dilyard, J.; Zhao, S.; You, J.J. Digital innovation and Industry 4.0 for global value chain resilience: Lessons learned and ways forward. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 2021, 63, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Alcácer, V.; Cruz-Machado, V. Scanning the Industry 4.0: A Literature Review on Technologies for Manufacturing Systems. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2019, 22, 899–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chiarini, A. Industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: Are we sure they are all relevant for environmental performance? Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 3194–3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tutak, M.; Brodny, J. Business Digital Maturity in Europe and Its Implication for Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pivoto, D.G.S.; de Almeida, L.F.F.; da Rosa Righi, R.; Rodrigues, J.J.P.C.; Lugli, A.B.; Alberti, A.M. Cyber-physical systems architectures for industrial internet of things applications in Industry 4.0: A literature review. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 176–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sony, M.; Naik, S. Key ingredients for evaluating Industry 4.0 readiness for organizations: A literature review. Benchmarking Int. J. 2019, 27, 2213–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rayna, T.; Striukova, L. 360° Business Model Innovation: Toward an Integrated View of Business Model Innovation. Res. Technol. Manag. 2016, 59, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Markov, K.; Vitliemov, P. Logistics 4.0 and supply chain 4.0 in the automotive industry. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 878, 012047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ghadge, A.; Er Kara, M.; Moradlou, H.; Goswami, M. The impact of Industry 4.0 implementation on supply chains. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2020, 31, 669–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bongomin, O.; Gilibrays Ocen, G.; Oyondi Nganyi, E.; Musinguzi, A.; Omara, T. Exponential Disruptive Technologies and the Required Skills of Industry 4.0. J. Eng. 2020, 2020, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kosacka-Olejnik, M.; Pitakaso, R. Industry 4.0: State of the art and research implications. Logforum 2019, 15, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ammar, M.; Haleem, A.; Javaid, M.; Walia, R.; Bahl, S. Improving material quality management and manufacturing organizations system through Industry 4.0 technologies. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45, 5089–5096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sahal, R.; Alsamhi, S.H.; Breslin, J.G.; Brown, K.N.; Ali, M.I. Digital Twins Collaboration for Automatic Erratic Operational Data Detection in Industry 4.0. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rosin, F.; Forget, P.; Lamouri, S.; Pellerin, R. Impacts of Industry 4.0 technologies on Lean principles. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 58, 1644–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Čemerková, Š.; Malátek, V. Human Resources Management in Multinational Companies in Response to Logistics Needs and Meeting Their Goals. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Decision Making for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises; Conference Proceedings. Silesian University in Opava, School of Business Administration in Karviná: Karviná, Czech Republic, 2019; pp. 61–69. [Google Scholar]
  50. Nitsche, B.; Straube, F.; Wirth, M. Application areas and antecedents of automation in logistics and supply chain management: A conceptual framework. Supply Chain. Forum Int. J. 2021, 22, 223–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nitsche, B.; Straube, F. Defining the “New Normal” in International Logistics Networks: Lessons Learned and Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic. WiSt—Wirtsch. Stud. 2021, 50, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nitsche, B. Exploring the Potentials of Automation in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Paving the Way for Autonomous Supply Chains. Logistics 2021, 5, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gerlach, B.; Zarnitz, S.; Nitsche, B.; Straube, F. Digital Supply Chain Twins—Conceptual Clarification, Use Cases and Benefits. Logistics 2021, 5, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Winkelhaus, S.; Grosse, E.H. Logistics 4.0: A systematic review towards a new logistics system. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 58, 18–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dördüncü, H. Logistics, Supply Chains and Smart Factories. In Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Barreto, L.; Amaral, A.; Pereira, T. Industry 4.0 implications in logistics: An overview. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 13, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nicoletti, B. The Future: Procurement 4.0. Agile Procurement; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 189–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kozma, D.; Varga, P.; Hegedüs, C. Supply Chain Management and Logistics 4.0—A Study on Arrowhead Framework Integration. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM), Cambridge, UK, 2–4 March 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tutam, M. Warehousing 4.0. In Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 95–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Brach, J. Formation of transport 4.0 and transport system 4.0 in the context of the impact of revolution 4.0 on modern road transport. Ekon. XXI Wieku 2019, 3, 87–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jeschke, S. Logistics 4.0—Artificial Intelligence and Other Modern Trends in Transport and Logistics. In XIII Forum of Polish Logistics Managers POLISH LOGISTICS; Center for Innovation Management and Transfer of Technology in Warsaw; University of Technology: Warsaw, Poland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  62. Amr, M.; Ezzat, M.; Kassem, S. Logistics 4.0: Definition and Historical Background. In Proceedings of the 2019 Novel Intelligent and Leading Emerging Sciences Conference (NILES), Giza, Egypt, 28–30 October 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Glistau, E.; Coello Machado, N.I. Industry 4.0, Logistics 4.0 and Materials—Chances and Solutions. Mater. Sci. Forum 2018, 919, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kim, E.; Kim, Y.; Park, J. The Necessity of Introducing Autonomous Trucks in Logistics 4.0. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Strandhagen, J.O.; Vallandingham, L.R.; Fragapane, G.; Strandhagen, J.W.; Stangeland, A.B.H.; Sharma, N. Logistics 4.0 and emerging sustainable business models. Adv. Manuf. 2017, 5, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Şekkeli, Z.H.; Bakan, İ. By the Effect of the Industry 4.0 on Logistics 4.0. J. Life Econ. 2018, 5, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Timm, I.J.; Lorig, F. Logistics 4.0—A challenge for simulation. In Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Huntington Beach, CA, USA, 6–9 December 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Prinz, C.; Morlock, F.; Freith, S.; Kreggenfeld, N.; Kreimeier, D.; Kuhlenkötter, B. Learning Factory Modules for Smart Factories in Industrie 4.0. Procedia CIRP 2016, 54, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Gattullo, M.; Scurati, G.W.; Fiorentino, M.; Uva, A.E.; Ferrise, F.; Bordegoni, M. Towards augmented reality manuals for industry 4.0: A methodology. Robot. Comput. -Integr. Manuf. 2019, 56, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Diniz, F.; Duarte, N.; Amaral, A.; Pereira, C. Industry 4.0: Individual Perceptions About Its Nine Technologies. In Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Gawankar, S.A. Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 117, 408–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Klee, H.; Allen, R. Simulation of Dynamic Systems with MATLAB and Simulink, 3rd ed.; Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  73. Sigov, A.; Ratkin, L.; Ivanov, L.A.; Xu, L.D. Emerging Enabling Technologies for Industry 4.0 and Beyond. Information Systems Front. A J. Res. Innov. 2022, 24, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kumar, A.; Nayyar, A. si3-Industry: A Sustainable, Intelligent, Innovative, Internet-of-Things Industry. In A Roadmap to Industry 4.0: Smart Production, Sharp Business and Sustainable Development; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Graetz, G.; Michaels, G. Robots at Work. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2018, 100, 753–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Perona, M.; Zheng, T.; Adrodegari, F.; Ardolino, M.; Bacchetti, A. An exploratory survey on the impacts of Logistics 4.0 on Italian manufacturing companies. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag. 2021, 1, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nobrega, J.H.C.; Rampasso, I.S.; Sanchez-Rodrigues, V.; Quelhas, O.L.G.; Leal Filho, W.; Serafim, M.P.; Anholon, R. Logistics 4.0 in Brazil: Critical Analysis and Relationships with SDG 9 Targets. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Batz, A.; Oleśków-Szłapka, J.; Stachowiak, A.; Pawłowski, G.; Maruszewska, K. Identification of Logistics 4.0 Maturity Levels in Polish Companies—Framework of the Model and Preliminary Research. In Sustainable Logistics and Production in Industry 4.0; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Group-IPS—Industrial Projects Services. New Survey Analyses the Degree of Spanish Supply Chain Digitalization. Group-IPS. Available online: https://www.group-ips.com/ips-news/detail/new-survey-analyses-the-degree-of-spanish-supply-chain-digitalization (accessed on 10 June 2022).
  80. Correa, J.S.; Sampaio, M.; Barros, R.D.C.; Hilsdorf, W.D.C. IoT and BDA in the Brazilian future logistics 4.0 scenario. Production 2020, 30, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Alamsjah, F.; Yunus, E.N. Achieving Supply Chain 4.0 and the Importance of Agility, Ambidexterity, and Organizational Culture: A Case of Indonesia. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dallasega, P.; Woschank, M.; Sarkis, J.; Tippayawong, K.Y. Logistics 4.0 measurement model: Empirical validation based on an international survey. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2022, 122, 1384–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Woschank, M.; Dallasega, P. The Impact of Logistics 4.0 on Performance in Manufacturing Companies: A Pilot Study. Procedia Manuf. 2021, 55, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Richnák, P. Key Challenges and Opportunities of Industry 4.0 in Metallurgical Industry in Slovakia. DANUBE 2022, 13, 137–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Richnák, P. Current Perspectives on Development of Industry 4.0 in Logistics of Machinery and Equipment Industry in Slovakia. LOGI—Sci. J. Transp. Logist. 2022, 13, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Richnák, P. Intensity of Innovation Activity and its Progressivity in Enterprises in Slovakia in the Era of Industry 4.0. AD ALTA 2021, 11, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Research design of the studied theme. Source: Author’s own.
Figure 1. Research design of the studied theme. Source: Author’s own.
Logistics 06 00079 g001
Figure 2. Data file structure by enterprise category. Source: Author’s own.
Figure 2. Data file structure by enterprise category. Source: Author’s own.
Logistics 06 00079 g002
Figure 3. Data file structure by regions of Slovakia. Source: Author’s own.
Figure 3. Data file structure by regions of Slovakia. Source: Author’s own.
Logistics 06 00079 g003
Figure 4. Data file structure by industrial sector. Source: Author’s own.
Figure 4. Data file structure by industrial sector. Source: Author’s own.
Logistics 06 00079 g004
Figure 5. Data file structure by territorial location of enterprises. Source: Author’s own.
Figure 5. Data file structure by territorial location of enterprises. Source: Author’s own.
Logistics 06 00079 g005
Table 1. Definition of logistics process 4.0.
Table 1. Definition of logistics process 4.0.
Author Logistics Process 4.0Definition of Logistics Process 4.0
Nicoletti [57]Procurement 4.0Procurement 4.0 uses technologies such as warehouse robots, self-driving vehicles to enable the introduction of processes that do not require operators and minimise human labour. The main intention is to integrate automation and information and communication solutions.
Kozma et al. [58]Inventory management 4.0Inventory management 4.0 represents the processes of warehouse and stock management, which are becoming more transparent and predictable with the development of the Industrial Internet of Things. Inventory management 4.0 is subject to monitoring and controlling the use of space by means of information and communication devices, for example, actual pallet location data is transmitted via RFID technology.
Tutam [59]Warehousing 4.0Warehousing 4.0 represents intelligent, automated and connected systems and represents a transformation to autonomy in industry by removing human participation. Autonomous systems, which require less space and operate 24/7, complement mechanical, electromechanical and automated systems by increasing productivity, efficiency, flexibility, modularity and agility, making warehouses more efficient.
Brach [60]Transport 4.0Transport 4.0 involves more autonomous transport, the core of which is based on automation and autonomy. Transport 4.0 concentrates on reducing the negative impact on the environment, on the process of movement along with all transport activities that are dominant in the networked environment.
Table 2. Definition of Logistics 4.0 technologies.
Table 2. Definition of Logistics 4.0 technologies.
Author Logistics 4.0 TechnologiesDefinition of Logistics 4.0 Technologies
Gattullo et al. [69]Virtual Reality and Augmented RealityVirtual Reality and Augmented Reality are complementary Industry 4.0 technologies. With the help of virtual reality, users are transported, via a headset, into a virtual world. But with augmented reality, applications present the illusion of multiple graphical layers of information layered on top of each other over a specific part of the user’s field of view.
Diniz et al. [70]Big DataThe large amount of structured and unstructured data from different types of sources, which may come from interconnected objects, describes a large amount of data. A fundamental characteristic of Big Data is performing analysis on this data.
Kamble et al. [71]Internet of ThingsInternet of Things is creating an industrial system that enables a combination of intelligent machines, advanced predictive analytics, and machine-human collaboration to promote productivity, efficiency, and reliability.
Klee and Allen [72]Advanced simulationSimulation is a common method of analysing the behaviour of complex systems. Simulation is a classical technology whose foundations date back to the era of analog computers.
Sigov et al. [73]Artificial intelligenceArtificial intelligence involves building intelligent machines capable of performing tasks that typically require human intelligence. The essence of artificial intelligence lies in reasoning, knowledge representation, planning, learning, processing machine learning approaches including artificial neural networks.
Kumar and Nayyar [74]Smart sensorsSmart sensors act as manufacturing assets that collect large amounts of data about products and their environment. This is data for example to measure temperature, humidity and smoke in the air. Smart sensors can detect anomalous activities and can provide the ability to communicate wirelessly, making the data synthetic through a cloud interface as well.
Graetz and Michaels [75]Autonomous robotsAutonomous robots perform autonomous manufacturing more precisely and can work alongside humans or even in places where humans are constrained. Autonomous robots have the ability to complete tasks on time and accurately, with a focus on flexibility, safety, versatility and collaboration.
Table 3. Data file structure by digital transformation in logistics.
Table 3. Data file structure by digital transformation in logistics.
Digital Transformation in LogisticsSmall EnterprisesMedium-Sized EnterprisesLarge Enterprises
YesAbsolute Frequency95257
Relative Frequency69.2%77.6%89.1%
NoAbsolute Frequency4157
Relative Frequency30.8%22.4%10.9%
TotalAbsolute Frequency136764
Relative Frequency100.0%100.0%100.0%
Table 4. Data file structure by implementing Industry 4.0 in logistics.
Table 4. Data file structure by implementing Industry 4.0 in logistics.
Small EnterprisesMedium-Sized EnterprisesLarge Enterprises
Strategy implementedAbsolute Frequency11838
Relative Frequency7.7%26.9%59.4%
Strategy in implementationAbsolute Frequency103217
Relative Frequency76.9%47.8%26.6%
Pilot initiatives launchedAbsolute Frequency0138
Relative Frequency0.0%19.4%12.5%
No strategy existsAbsolute Frequency241
Relative Frequency15.4%6.0%1.6%
TotalAbsolute Frequency136764
Relative Frequency100.0%100.0%100.0%
Table 5. Data file structure of Industry 4.0 implementation in various types of logistics.
Table 5. Data file structure of Industry 4.0 implementation in various types of logistics.
Small EnterprisesMedium-Sized EnterprisesLarge Enterprises
Production LogisticsAbsolute Frequency55451
Relative Frequency38.5%80.6%79.7%
Procurement LogisticsAbsolute Frequency444
Relative Frequency30.8%6.0%6.2%
Distribution LogisticsAbsolute Frequency499
Relative Frequency30.8%13.4%14.1%
TotalAbsolute Frequency136764
Relative Frequency100.0%100.0%100.0%
Table 6. Data file structure by barriers.
Table 6. Data file structure by barriers.
Small EnterprisesMedium-Sized EnterprisesLarge Enterprises
Investment costsAbsolute Frequency115938
Relative Frequency84.6%88.1%59.4%
New supply chain settingAbsolute Frequency1824
Relative Frequency7.7%11.9%37.5%
Concern about meeting objectivesAbsolute Frequency101
Relative Frequency7.7%0.0%1.6%
Shortage of skilled labourAbsolute Frequency001
Relative Frequency0.0%0.0%1.6%
TotalAbsolute Frequency136764
Relative Frequency100.0%100.0%100.0%
Table 7. Industry 4.0 technologies used in production logistics.
Table 7. Industry 4.0 technologies used in production logistics.
ANOVASum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.
Virtual reality and Augmented realityBetween Groups58.10269.6842.6280.019
Within Groups504.8361373.685
Total562.937143
DronesBetween Groups84.849614.1423.2570.005
Within Groups594.9011374.342
Total679.750143
Big DataBetween Groups63.194610.5322.4980.025
Within Groups577.6321374.216
Total640.826143
5G networkBetween Groups15.58162.5972.5670.022
Within Groups138.5781371.012
Total154.160143
Additive manufacturingBetween Groups135.580622.5975.0530.000
Within Groups612.6431374.472
Total748.222143
Internet of ThingsBetween Groups97.277616.2134.1800.001
Within Groups531.3831373.879
Total628.660143
Advanced simulationBetween Groups73.336612.2233.1610.006
Within Groups529.6641373.866
Total603.000143
Artificial intelligenceBetween Groups69.328611.5552.8180.013
Within Groups561.8311374.101
Total631.160143
Smart sensorsBetween Groups63.494610.5822.9620.009
Within Groups489.4441373.573
Total552.938143
Autonomous robotsBetween Groups47.97667.9963.8230.001
Within Groups286.5791372.092
Total334.556143
Cloud computingBetween Groups62.366610.3943.4770.003
Within Groups409.5231372.989
Total471.889143
Cyber-physical systemsBetween Groups52.69368.7822.6900.017
Within Groups447.1961373.264
Total499.889143
Table 8. Industry 4.0 technologies used in procurement logistics.
Table 8. Industry 4.0 technologies used in procurement logistics.
ANOVASum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.
Virtual reality and Augmented realityBetween Groups24.55064.0920.7260.630
Within Groups772.4501375.638
Total797.000143
DronesBetween Groups36.56766.0951.1900.315
Within Groups701.6551375.122
Total738.222143
Big DataBetween Groups70.746611.7913.2820.005
Within Groups492.1911373.593
Total562.938143
5G networkBetween Groups91.178615.1963.5370.003
Within Groups588.5721374.296
Total679.750143
Additive manufacturingBetween Groups34.45765.7431.2980.262
Within Groups606.3691374.426
Total640.826143
Internet of ThingsBetween Groups126.091621.0156.2470.000
Within Groups460.8471373.364
Total586.938143
Advanced simulationBetween Groups57.71369.6192.6610.018
Within Groups495.2241373.615
Total552.938143
Artificial intelligenceBetween Groups57.70969.6184.7600.000
Within Groups276.8471372.021
Total334.556143
Smart sensorsBetween Groups75.379612.5634.3410.000
Within Groups396.5101372.894
Total471.889143
Autonomous robotsBetween Groups12.27262.0451.9750.073
Within Groups141.8881371.036
Total154.160143
Cloud computingBetween Groups107.693617.9493.7050.002
Within Groups663.7451374.845
Total771.438143
Cyber-physical systemsBetween Groups18.45263.0750.5410.776
Within Groups778.5481375.683
Total797.000143
Table 9. Industry 4.0 technologies used in distribution logistics.
Table 9. Industry 4.0 technologies used in distribution logistics.
ANOVASum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.
Virtual reality and Augmented realityBetween Groups32.18665.3641.1350.345
Within Groups647.5641374.727
Total679.750143
DronesBetween Groups44.43767.4061.7010.125
Within Groups596.3891374.353
Total640.826143
Big DataBetween Groups68.096611.3492.7740.014
Within Groups560.5641374.092
Total628.660143
5G networkBetween Groups52.20268.7002.1640.050
Within Groups550.7981374.020
Total603.000143
Additive manufacturingBetween Groups47.27167.8781.4900.186
Within Groups724.1671375.286
Total771.438143
Internet of ThingsBetween Groups102.735617.1224.4390.000
Within Groups528.4251373.857
Total631.160143
Advanced simulationBetween Groups70.957611.8263.1400.006
Within Groups515.9801373.766
Total586.938143
Artificial intelligenceBetween Groups49.95368.3252.7030.016
Within Groups421.9361373.080
Total471.889143
Smart sensorsBetween Groups86.766614.4613.0410.008
Within Groups651.4561374.755
Total738.222143
Autonomous robotsBetween Groups78.959613.1603.2650.005
Within Groups552.2001374.031
Total631.160143
Cloud computingBetween Groups43.87567.3132.1970.047
Within Groups456.0131373.329
Total499.889143
Cyber-physical systemsBetween Groups4.6616.7770.7120.641
Within Groups149.4981371.091
Total154.160143
Table 10. Industry 4.0 effects on logistics processes.
Table 10. Industry 4.0 effects on logistics processes.
Pearson CorrelationSig. (2-tailed)N
Customer service0.3330.000144
Inventory Management0.3280.000144
logistics Communication0.3410.000144
Material handling0.1970.018144
Order processing0.2750.001144
Packaging0.1680.044144
Procurement/Purchasing0.1720.039144
Transport and Transportation0.2660.001144
Warehousing0.3530.000144
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Richnák, P. Current Trend of Industry 4.0 in Logistics and Transformation of Logistics Processes Using Digital Technologies: An Empirical Study in the Slovak Republic. Logistics 2022, 6, 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6040079

AMA Style

Richnák P. Current Trend of Industry 4.0 in Logistics and Transformation of Logistics Processes Using Digital Technologies: An Empirical Study in the Slovak Republic. Logistics. 2022; 6(4):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6040079

Chicago/Turabian Style

Richnák, Patrik. 2022. "Current Trend of Industry 4.0 in Logistics and Transformation of Logistics Processes Using Digital Technologies: An Empirical Study in the Slovak Republic" Logistics 6, no. 4: 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6040079

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop