Next Article in Journal
Physicochemical and Textural Features of the Shuidong Mustard (Brassica juncea) with a 15-Day Microorganism Fermentation Under a Lower Table Salt Usage
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Controlled Atmosphere Conditions on the Quality Characteristics, Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Pork Bone Broth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exposure Assessment of Tropane Alkaloids via Barley Grain-Based Products Among Serbian Population
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Risk Assessment in Food Safety

by
Adriana Pavesi Arisseto Bragotto
Departamento de Ciência de Alimentos e Nutrição, Faculdade de Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-862, SP, Brazil
Foods 2026, 15(7), 1190; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15071190
Submission received: 23 March 2026 / Accepted: 30 March 2026 / Published: 1 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Risk Assessment in Food Safety)
Food safety is a fundamental pillar of public health and a prerequisite for food security, as safe food is essential to ensure that diets support both human health and well-being [1]. In an increasingly globalized and complex food system, safeguarding food safety has become more challenging due to extended supply chains, technological change, evolving diets, and emerging pressures such as climate change and food system transformation. While food safety has long been a concern, these interconnected drivers have increased the complexity and diversity of potential hazards in food, including microbiological and physical agents, chemical contaminants, food additives, residues, and allergens [2]. Such hazards may compromise food safety and, consequently, human health, highlighting the need for robust scientific approaches to identify, evaluate, and control them.
Within this context, a critical distinction must be made between hazards and risks. A hazard refers to any biological, chemical, or physical agent in food with the potential to cause adverse health effects, whereas risk reflects the likelihood and severity of such effects occurring under specific conditions of exposure to a hazard [3]. Thus, the mere presence of a hazard does not necessarily imply a significant risk. This distinction is essential for avoiding overly conservative or misleading conclusions and for enabling the prioritization of food safety issues based on their actual impact on public health.
Risk assessment has therefore been globally recognized as a key scientific tool to support decision-making in food safety. It encompasses four steps: hazard identification, hazard characterization, exposure assessment, and risk characterization [3]. In recent years, significant advances have been made in refining these approaches, including the adoption of probabilistic models to better capture variability and uncertainty [4], as well as the incorporation of concepts such as bioavailability, bioaccessibility, and cumulative exposure [5]. In parallel, New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), including in vitro systems, in silico models, and omics-based approaches, have emerged as promising tools to support hazard characterization and reduce reliance on traditional animal testing [6]. Despite these advances, important challenges remain, particularly in dealing with data gaps, emerging hazards, and the complexity of dietary exposure scenarios, reinforcing the need for continuous methodological development and interdisciplinary collaboration.
The contributions to this Special Issue reflect the diversity and evolution of research in risk assessment applied to food safety. The review by Pekmezci et al. [Contribution 1] provides a comprehensive overview of dietary chemical exposure and its implications for human health, setting the stage for the studies presented. Several contributions focus on exposure assessment, including the study by Stojanović et al. [Contribution 2] on dietary exposure to tropane alkaloids in cereal-based products in Serbia, the work by Ku et al. [Contribution 3] assessing food preservative intake among eating-out populations using a total diet study approach, and the study by Pôrto and Arisseto Bragotto [Contribution 4] estimating food color exposure in the Brazilian population based on national consumption data. Methodological advances are further illustrated by the study of Ma et al. [Contribution 5], which investigates the role of bioaccessibility in refining exposure assessment of pesticide residues. In addition, the work by Peycheva et al. [Contribution 6] presents a benefit–risk analysis of toxic and essential elements in fish, highlighting the importance of integrating both adverse and beneficial effects in food safety evaluations. Finally, Alewijn et al. [Contribution 7] analyze food fraud cases in the European Union, providing important insights into the relationship between fraud and food safety hazards. Collectively, these contributions emphasize the importance of realistic exposure assessment, context-specific data, and innovative methodologies to support more robust risk characterization. Ultimately, strengthening risk assessment is essential not only to protect public health but also to underpin resilient and sustainable food systems and ensure true food security.
In conclusion, advancing risk assessment in food safety requires not only methodological innovation but also the integration of multidisciplinary knowledge and context-specific data. As food systems continue to evolve, strengthening the scientific basis of risk assessment will be essential in order to address emerging challenges, reduce uncertainties, and support effective decision-making. The contributions to this Special Issue highlight both the progress achieved and the work that remains, reinforcing the central role of risk assessment in protecting public health and ensuring sustainable and safe food systems.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this work, the author used ChatGPT-version 5.3 (OpenAI) in order to improve the readability and language of the manuscript. The author has reviewed and edited the output and takes full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Pekmezci, H.; Sipahi, S.; Başaran, B. Health Risk Assessment of Dietary Chemical Exposures: A Comprehensive Review. Foods 2025, 14, 4133.
  • Stojanović, T.; Konstantinović, B.; Bursić, V.; Vuković, G.; Milešević, J.; Zeković, M.; Šarac, I.; Pejin, Đ.; Mandić, N.; Popov, M.; et al. Exposure Assessment of Tropane Alkaloids via Barley Grain-Based Products Among Serbian Population. Foods 2026, 15, 448.
  • Ku, H.-H.; Yang, S.-C.; Hsiao, H.-A.; Chen, J.-S.; Ling, M.-P. Assessing Dietary Exposure Risk to Food Preservatives Among the Eating-Out Population in Taiwan Using the Total Diet Study Method. Foods 2025, 14, 365.
  • Pôrto, L.B.G.; Bragotto, A.P.A. Food Colors’ Dietary Exposure in the Brazilian Population Using the 2008–2009 and 2017–2018 POF Food Consumption Databases. Foods 2024, 13, 4006.
  • Ma, C.; Zhang, Q.; Lv, D.-Z.; Song, J.; Fan, Q.; Tian, H.; Wang, M.-Y. Study of Factors Influencing the Oral Bioaccessibility of Commonly Used and Detected Pesticides in Bananas and Mangoes Based on in vitro Methods. Foods 2024, 13, 2019.
  • Peycheva, K.; Panayotova, V.; Hristova, T.; Dobreva, D.A.; Stoycheva, T.; Stancheva, R.; Georgieva, S.; Andreev, E.; Nikolova, S.; Merdzhanova, A. Toxic and Trace Elements in Raw and Cooked Bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix) from the Black Sea: Benefit–Risk Analysis. Foods 2026, 15, 140.
  • Alewijn, M.; Goemans, P.; Gussow, K.E.; Turner, K.J.; Pustjens, A.M. An Analysis of the Severity of Food Safety Hazards in EU Food Fraud Cases. Foods 2025, 14, 4328.

References

  1. FAO. The Future of Food Safety. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/ca4289en/CA4289EN.pdf (accessed on 19 March 2026).
  2. FAO. Thinking About the Future of Food Safety: A Foresight Report. Available online: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/acfc4e93-8702-47da-acd2-7bf064ea9b0b/content (accessed on 19 March 2026).
  3. FAO; WHO. Codex Alimentarius Commission Procedural Manual. Available online: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/28cc145b-f0a0-44f5-940d-211c4f8e7d62/content (accessed on 19 March 2026).
  4. Paoli, G.M.; Hartnett, E.; Price, P.S. Use of probabilistic exposure models in the assessment of dietary exposure to chemicals. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2025, 42, 819–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. González Combarros, R.; González-García, M.; Blanco-Díaz, G.D.; Segovia Bravo, K.; Reino Moya, J.L.; López-Sánchez, J.I. Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures in Foods: A Comprehensive Methodological and Regulatory Review. Foods 2026, 15, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wood, A.; Atienzar, F.; Basili, D.; Coulet, M.; Fernandez, R.; Galano, M.; Marin-Kuan, M.; Montoya, G.; Piechota, P.; Punt, A.; et al. Countdown to 2027—Maximising use of NAMs in food safety assessment: Closing the gap for regulatory assessments in Europe. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2025, 162, 105863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bragotto, A.P.A. Risk Assessment in Food Safety. Foods 2026, 15, 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15071190

AMA Style

Bragotto APA. Risk Assessment in Food Safety. Foods. 2026; 15(7):1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15071190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bragotto, Adriana Pavesi Arisseto. 2026. "Risk Assessment in Food Safety" Foods 15, no. 7: 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15071190

APA Style

Bragotto, A. P. A. (2026). Risk Assessment in Food Safety. Foods, 15(7), 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15071190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop