Next Article in Journal
Nutrient and Phytochemical Composition of Nine African Leafy Vegetables: A Comparative Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Weiss or Wit: Chemical Profiling of Wheat Beers via NMR-Based Metabolomics
Previous Article in Journal
Advances in Food Aroma Analysis: Extraction, Separation, and Quantification Techniques
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aroma Release and Consumer Perception During Cider Consumption
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Occurrence of Pesticides, Mycotoxins, and Heavy Metals in Distilled Alcoholic Beverages: A Review of Contaminants and Health Risks

1
Faculty of Food Technology Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Franje Kuhača 18, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
2
Faculty of Tourism and Rural Development in Požega, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Vukovarska ul. 17, 34000 Požega, Croatia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(8), 1303; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14081303
Submission received: 5 March 2025 / Revised: 29 March 2025 / Accepted: 6 April 2025 / Published: 9 April 2025

Abstract

:
Distilled alcoholic beverages may contain pesticides, mycotoxins, and heavy metals originating from raw materials, environmental factors and technological processes. This review paper analyses the existing regulations related to these contaminants, their impact on health and the risk assessment associated with their consumption. Sources of contamination are discussed, including the influence of climatic conditions and emerging environmental risks on the occurrence of contaminants in raw materials, as well as the transfer of all contaminants during the distillation process. Furthermore, analytical detection methods and strategic measures to reduce consumer exposure are reviewed. The results of the review highlight the need for continued research, improvement of control methods and adaptation of regulatory standards in line with new scientific knowledge.

1. Introduction

Spirits are alcoholic beverages intended for human consumption, which have specific sensory properties and contain an alcohol content of at least 15% by volume. They are produced by direct distillation of fermented agricultural raw materials, maceration of herbs in ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin, or by adding flavorings, sweeteners and other food products. They can also be produced by mixing strong alcoholic beverages with other alcoholic components [1]. Distilled alcoholic beverages or spirits contain the greatest concentration of alcohol. By distilling ethanol obtained from fermenting agricultural products, such as fruits, grains, or vegetables, they remove almost all of their naturally occurring compounds, except water and ethyl alcohol [2]. Generally, spirits processing involves the preparation of raw materials, fermentation, distillation, and aging [3]. At the concentrations usually found in alcoholic drinks, hundreds of chemicals serve as flavoring agents, but there may also be many toxic and carcinogenic compounds present [4]. Some of the most famous spirits are whiskey, brandy, rum, vodka, gin, and tequila. All these drinks are characterized by a unique production technology, and they are produced from different raw materials such as grains (whiskey, vodka, gin), fruit (brandy, rum, gin, tequila), vegetables (vodka, gin) and sugar (vodka, rum, gin) [5]. Fruit spirits are also very popular; they are produced by fermenting various fruits, vegetables, and even grains, and finally distilling the fermented mash [6]. Alcoholic spirits, like food in general, are susceptible to contamination by various contaminants, some of which are shown in Table 1.
Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by a wide variety of filamentous fungi, most important of them Aspergillus, Fusarium, Penicillium, and Alternatia [7,8]. Mycotoxins are known to cause a variety of toxic effects in humans and animals, including hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and immunosuppression [9]. When exposed to mycotoxins, people can develop numerous diseases such as allergies, reduced immune response, and even cancer [10].
Apart from this, other contaminants are found in the environment or on process equipment, such as pesticides and heavy metals [3,11]. Heavy metals are essential micronutrients and play a role in cellular biochemistry and physiological functions, but they also pose a number of health risks [12]. Pesticides are becoming more prevalent in agriculture due to increasing food demands [2]. Some of the reasons why pesticides are used in the cultivation of raw materials intended for the production of distilled alcohol are to combat diseases and insects, increase crop yields, improve their quality, and extend their shelf life. Whether pesticides appear in the distilled alcoholic beverage depends on the physical and chemical properties of the pesticides during the production process [13,14]. Exposure to pesticides and heavy metals can have an immunotoxic and carcinogenic effect on the body. It can also cause oxidative stress, changing immune and hormonal level reactions in the human body, which can lead to the formation of tumors [15]. The following are comprehensive reviews of the recent literature on the presence of these contaminants in distilled alcoholic spirits, their regulation, migration pathways, and potential health risks.

2. Regulation and Legislation

Given their high popularity, frequency of consumption, and various contaminants in raw materials, spirits are a potential risk to human health. In order to ensure the quality and safety of spirits, many countries and international organizations have introduced standards and regulations related to alcoholic beverages.
Regulation (EU) 2019/787 [1] of the European Parliament and Council regulates the production, labeling, and protection of spirit drinks within the European Union. It lays down definitions, criteria for raw materials and production processes, rules on geographical indications, and conditions for placing these products on the market.
The European Union’s Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 [16] regulates the maximum residue levels (MRLs) for pesticides in food, including raw materials used in the production of alcoholic beverages. Pesticide residues in raw materials must not exceed permissible limits in order to maintain the safety of the final product. In addition, the Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 [17] of 25 April 2023 has defined MLs for certain contaminants such as mycotoxins and heavy metals in food and raw materials, and one of them is patulin (PAT), the maximum value of which is determined specifically for spirit alcohols.
In the USA, the presence of pesticides, mycotoxins, and heavy metals in food is regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration for the sake of consumer health.

3. Climate Change and Emerging Environmental Risks

Food systems are being threatened by climate change, affecting food security as well as food safety and quality [18]. In addition to affecting responses to abiotic stress, immune impulses and pathogen survival, environmental conditions can also affect pathogen development and survival [19].
Climate change plays a very important role in the appearance of mycotoxins in raw materials for strong alcoholic beverages. Species and concentrations of certain mycotoxins are found to be in a correlation with meteorological conditions in the year of crop harvest, thus some species prefer hot and drought seasons, while others prefer warm weather and moisture [20,21]. Temperature, humidity, and precipitation changes can favor the growth of fungi such as Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Fusarium, which are known mycotoxin producers. These fungal genera produce the greatest number of mycotoxins, of which the most important ones are aflatoxins (AFT), fumonisins (FUM), ochratoxins, trichothecenes, and zearalenone (ZEA). A combination of high temperatures, droughts, and sudden increases in humidity is most conducive to the development of these fungi, thereby increasing the danger of contamination of raw materials like grains and grapes [22,23]. In Southern and Central Europe, climatic conditions that favor the growth of Aspergillus flavus will likely increase the risk of AFT contamination in maize in the next 30 years [24]. Magan and Aldred [25] emphasize that aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), produced by A. flavus, is spreading geographically due to global warming, and previously unaffected regions are being contaminated. This contamination is particularly prevalent in maize, a major ingredient in whiskey and other spirits production. As a result of the extremely dry weather in those years, A. flavus has become one of the most important pathogens in maize. In the case of a temperature increase of 2 °C, the risk of AFT will increase in some areas in Mediterranean Europe [26]. The most important factor besides temperature is the levels of CO2. CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere can increase the aggressiveness of Fusarium species, resulting in the production of FUM and deoxynivalenol (DON). Due to the widespread distribution of these mycotoxins on wheat and barley, whiskey and beer production are prime targets [24].
Table 1. Summary table of analyses of individual contaminants.
Table 1. Summary table of analyses of individual contaminants.
Contaminant TypeExamplesOriginInfluencing FactorsLiterature
Pesticidesherbicides
fungicides
insecticides
acaricide
plant growth regulators
grain raw materials residues fruit raw materials residuespesticide stability distillation efficiency[13,27]
MycotoxinsAFT
DON
FUM
ZEA
T-2/HT-2
OTA
PAT
fungal contamination of raw materialsclimate conditions storage conditions[28,29]
Heavy MetalsEssentialCu
Zn
Co
Cr
Mn
Fe
environmental pollution equipment contaminationwater source
soil contamination
distillation setup
[4]
Non-essentialPb
Cd
Hg
As
As well as affecting mycotoxins, climate change can also affect raw material microbiomes. Microorganisms that act as natural antagonists against mycotoxigenic fungi can be reduced by an increase in temperature. As a result, harmful species are allowed to grow uncontrolled, therefore increasing contamination risk [23]. The impact of climate change could be mitigated by adopting integrated agricultural management systems, such as crop rotation, proper irrigation methods and the use of biological plant protection agents. Mycotoxins can also be digitally monitored and forecasted so that producers can make timely decisions [24].
Climate change, especially rising temperatures and altered precipitation patterns, is expected to impact crop yields and pesticide use. Due to changes in pest prevalence and pesticide efficiency, pesticide application is expected to increase in quantity, frequency, and variety. It is also possible that climate change will accelerate the degradation of pesticides through volatilization, moisture, and sunlight exposure, potentially reducing the concentrations of pesticides in the environment [30]. According to this, climate change will certainly affect the presence of pesticides in the environment in the future. Higher temperatures may accelerate their degradation, reducing exposure, while heavy rainfall after application may increase concentrations in water. Pesticides such as azoxystrobin, difenoconazole, and MCPA pose significant environmental risks, highlighting the need of reducing their use [31].
There are several reasons why heavy metals appear in food, such as their natural existence in the Earth’s crust at different concentrations or their gradual deposition in the environment by humans [32]. Food contamination with heavy metals is also a result of the depletion of deposits, direct air pollution, irrigation of soil with polluted water and groundwater pollution [33]. These metals travel through the atmosphere and water via dispersion and deposition, accumulating in soils and water sediments. These sediments act as secondary sources, releasing heavy metals back into the environment. Climate conditions play a crucial role in this process. Rising temperatures can reduce soil water content while increasing evapotranspiration, which in turn causes more resuspension of soil dust particles containing heavy metals [34]. As persistent environmental pollutants, heavy metals accumulate and biomagnify within biological systems, causing severe health and ecological harm [35].

4. Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Cereal-Based Raw Materials

Currently, the most used raw materials for the production of distilled alcoholic beverages are, among others, cereals. The most common examples of these cereals are rye, wheat, and maize [36]. Since they are exposed to different weather conditions and climate changes in the field, as well as poor handling and storage conditions, grains are contaminated with various types of toxigenic fungi and with them, their secondary metabolites, mycotoxins [37]. Among hundreds of known mycotoxins, the focus of most research and regulations are on AFT and ochratoxin A (OTA), Fusarium mycotoxins FUM, ZEA, DON, and T-2/HT-2 toxins, since they contaminate numerous foods and occur worldwide [9].
The main producers of AFT are members of the Aspergillus species. They contaminate different cereal grains in the field such as wheat, barley, corn, rice, and sorghum, mostly in hot and humid conditions. Of the aflatoxins listed, according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), aflatoxin B1 is classified as a Category 1 human carcinogen [38].
The following group of mycotoxins mainly produced by Fusarium verticillioides (syn. Fusarium moniliforme) and Fusarium proliferatum fungi in the field are fumonisins, which contaminate various types of crops such as corn, wheat, sorghum, and barley [39,40]. More than 30 FUM homologs have been identified so far, and the most widespread and toxic member is fumonisin B1 (FB1), which is classified as a possibly carcinogenic to humans by IARC in Group 2B [38].
The next family of mycotoxins, ochratoxins, are produced mainly by Aspergillus ochraceus, Aspergillus carbonarius, and Penicillium verrucosum in different matrices such as dry beans, corn, peanuts, rapeseeds, etc., [41]. Ochratoxins can be divided into three different groups (A, B, and C) based on differences in characteristic functional groups. According to Al-Anati and Petzinger [42], OTA is the most toxic member of the ochratoxin family, and in addition to the acute immunotoxicity and hepatotoxicity it can cause, animal studies have shown that it can induce immunotoxicity and act as a carcinogen [40,43].
Another well-known mycotoxin that is formed in the field and during postharvest storage is DON, which belongs to the β-trichothecene group. It is produced by Fusarium fungi, specifically Fusarium culmorum and Fusarium graminearum, which are the most important causes of fusarium head blight, a cereal disease that attacks wheat, barley, triticale, and oats [44]. Although it is less toxic than T-2 and HT-2 toxins, which belong to type A trichothecenes, it contaminates cereals and cereal products in a high proportion [45,46]. According to the impact on human health by IARC, DON is classified in Group 3, not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans [38].
The mycotoxin ZEA is primarily produced by various Fusarium species, such as Fusarium culmorum, Fusarium graminearum, and Fusarium sporotrichioides, and occurs in temperate regions on various types of cereals such as barley, oats, sorghum, wheat, and rice [47]. In addition to contamination in the field, which is the most common, contamination of grains can occur due to storage with high humidity levels [48]. Similar to DON, ZEA is classified as a Group 3 carcinogen by IARC [38].
PAT is a mycotoxin produced by the genera Aspergillus, Penicilium, and Byssochlamys through secondary metabolism. At high concentrations, it exhibits immunotoxic properties but is not carcinogenic to humans [49]. Unlike the previously mentioned mycotoxins, which are characteristic of cereals, PAT can be detected as a natural contaminant mainly in pome fruits, such as apples, but also in other fruits, such as hawthorn [50]. In addition, it often appears in fruit juices, especially apple juices produced from unqualified fruit [3].

5. Occurrence of Pesticides in Fruit-Based Raw Materials

Due to their unique aroma, distilled fruit drinks are very popular. This type of drink is produced from various fruits, both cultivated and wild, and the most common representatives are plums, apples, cherries, pears, apricots, and quinces [51].
Since pesticides are commonly used in the production of cultivated fruits, among the most common commodities containing pesticide residues are apples, oranges, grapefruit, apricots, peaches, etc. [52]. According to another study, the fruits with the highest levels of pesticide residues were apples, papayas, strawberries, pears, grapes, and citrus fruits. In addition to their role in production and protection, pesticides are associated with a wide range of hazards to human health, ranging from short-term effects such as headaches and nausea, to chronic effects such as cancer, reproductive problems, and endocrine disruption [53].
In general, the term pesticides covers a wide range of substances including insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, rodenticides, molluscicides, nematicides, plant growth regulators, and others [54]. According to their chemical structure, pesticides can be divided into the following groups: organochlorines, organophosphates, carbamic, and thiocarbamic derivates, carboxylic acids and their derivates, urea derivates, heterocyclic compounds, phenol and nitrophenol derivates, hydrocarbons, ketones, aldehydes, fluorine-containing compounds, copper-containing compounds, metal–organic and inorganic compounds, natural, and synthetic pyrethroids [55].
Since there are different fruits that are treated with a large number of different pesticides, the rest of this chapter will present research on pesticide residues found in one type of fruit, apples. According to research published in their paper by Kowalska et al. [56], the apple harvests from 2012 and 2020 were compared, according to which in 2012, as many as 26 different pesticide residues were quantified in the observed apples, and in 2020, only 7 of them were quantified. As listed, the following pesticides were detected in 2012: boscalid (fungicide), carbendazim (fungicide), chlorpyrifos (acaricide, insecticide), bupirimate (fungicide), difenoconazole (fungicide), diphenylamine (plant growth regulator), disulfoton (insecticide), hexythiazox (acaricide, insecticide), fenazaquin (acaricide), malathion (acaricide, insecticide), propargite (acaricide), pyraclostrobin (fungicide, plant growth regulator), pyrimethanil (fungicide), thiophanate methyl (fungicide), thiacloprid (insecticide), triflumuron (insecticide), flusilazole (fungicide), pirimicarb (insecticide), trifloxystrobin (fungicide), methoxyfenozide (insecticide), thiodicarb (insecticide), epoxiconazole (fungicide), hexaflumuron (insecticide), triadimenol (fungicide), indoxacarb (insecticide), and cyprodinil (fungicide). Much fewer identified pesticide residues in apples were found during the 2020 harvest, namely: boscalid (fungicide), pyraclostrobin (fungicide, plant growth regulator), captan (fungicide), fludioxonil (fungicide), tetrahydrophthalimide (THPI) (metabolite of captan–fungicyd), fluopyram (fungicide), tebuconazole (fungicide).

6. Metals in Alcoholic Beverages and Public Health Implications

Heavy metals are a group of compounds with high atomic numbers and a density five times greater than the density of water. They are naturally occurring, mostly found in the Earth’s crust, and cannot be easily degraded, so they persist for a long period [57]. Essential heavy metals are naturally present in the human body and are beneficial to human health. This group consists of metals such as copper, zinc, cobalt, chromium, manganese, and iron, which are needed by every living organism for various biochemical and physiological functions [58]. However, these metals can be toxic if the concentration is higher than the maximum permissible limit for the organism [59], like copper and zinc, which are considered essential for a living organism, but excessive intake can lead to disorders and diseases [60]. The toxic properties of copper are manifested in the bioaccumulative properties of the Cu2+ ion, which can travel through the food chain. When the intake of Cu2+ ions is increased, various diseases can occur, such as heart disease, brain damage, circulatory system damage, gastrointestinal irritation, and necrotic changes in the liver and kidneys [61].
Non-essential heavy metals, on the other hand, can be toxic to body cells even at low concentrations, and they have no biological role in the living organisms [58]. Among the most important representatives of this group of metals are certainly lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and arsenic (As), which pose a threat to human health if exposure occurs. Long-term exposure to these elements could lead to progressive progression of physical diseases as well as neurological degenerative conditions [57]. It is known that exposure to Cd and Hg leads to various diseases that are mostly manifested in reduced kidney function and reproductive capacity, hypertension, tumors, and liver dysfunction, while exposure to lead leads to kidney failure, liver damage, hearing impairment, intellectual disability [62], damages the nervous system, and causes brain disorders [3]. In addition to its harmful and toxic effects, Pb is considered a major environmental health risk [60]. Moreover, some of the metals are classified as carcinogens (Cr, As, Cd), while some are possible carcinogens (Ni, Co, Pb) [63].
In most alcoholic beverages, the main ingredients and raw materials are mostly plant materials, in which metal bioaccumulation occurs mainly through uptake from the soil. The reason for metal accumulation in the soil is mainly the use of fertilizers, pesticides, contaminated surface water, sewage sludge, and wastewater [58]. In addition, the contamination of cereals with heavy metals also occurs due to the rapid industrialization and urbanization of agricultural areas [21]. It is possible to find them in raw materials for the production of fruit spirits [64], and possible sources are equipment used in all parts of the production process like distillation, aging, bottling, and storage. Accordingly, numerous metalloids and metals such as As, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Sn, Pb, and Zn were found in them [4]. They may be frequently present at levels of public health concern, particularly in off-label spirits, but are rarely found at levels that can cause acute toxicity [64]. However, if levels of heavy metal ions are exceeded, they can be harmful to human health due to their toxic properties [65]. The presence of metals in food and beverages should be monitored frequently to ensure that they are safe for human consumption [66].

7. Migration into Distillates

The residual amount of pesticides, excluding those lost during fermentation and distillation, in distilled spirits can be found in stills if some of the pesticides migrate to the stills [13]. While distillation may reduce the concentration of pesticide residues, it is not completely effective [67]. According to a study conducted by [27], analyzing the migration of 249 pesticides from the raw material to the distillate, it was found that 220 pesticides were not detected in the distillate. Therefore, it can be concluded that the distillation process reduces the risk of exposure to pesticides. Nevertheless, several pesticides (cycloate, cadusafos, diallate, ethoprophos, and thiometon), which may pose a risk, have significant transfer ratios (Table 2). In another study by [13], five pesticides (terbufos, fenthion, iprobenfos, flutolanil, and ethoprophos) contaminated the raw material with about 5.1 to 70 times the MRL, and the distillation migration was from 0 to 14.3%, which led to the conclusion that some pesticides migrate into the distillate in single-stage distillation. However, in the same study, the fermented liquefaction was contaminated with six pesticides (fenthion, terbufos, ethoprophos, iprobenfos, oxadiazon, and flutolanil), and after distillation with a distillation column, none of the pesticides were detected in the distilled spirit [13].
Contamination with mycotoxins can be found in a variety of grains, fruits, and other raw materials used in making whiskey, brandy, and vodka. Although distillation greatly reduces the quantity of mycotoxins, these toxic substances are still detectable in the final product, according to certain studies [28]. Since mycotoxins remain persistent in raw materials, any poor processing or lack of appropriate monitoring could easily result in their migration into distilled beverages [29]. Due to the high temperatures generated during distillation, mycotoxins are thermally decomposed and separated from the volatile alcohol fractions, thereby reducing their concentration. OTA can be degraded only to a lesser extent by heat and only at temperatures of 180 °C and above, and testing the thermal stability of aflatoxin in its pure form, it was found that a heating temperature of approximately 150 °C almost completely degrades AFB1 [68]. Shin and Lee [28] investigated the migration of selected mycotoxins during the process of distillation and their presence in distillates prepared by pilot-scale continuous distillation. This research has proven that, even in cases of contamination of raw materials with certain levels of the tested mycotoxins, their migration into the distillate is negligible when a continuous distillation column is used. Thus, only 0.19 µg/L of OTA was detected in the distillate (Table 2) with an alcohol content of 94–95% vol, and the migration took place in three consecutive distillations (0.11–0.22 µg/L). These results indicate a low risk of mycotoxin presence in the final product when applying a continuous distillation process. Pietri et al. [69] have shown that mycotoxins survive fermentation and distillation, although their concentrations decrease dramatically. As alcohol is steam distilled, fermented, and distilled, its raw ingredients are removed. The presence of migrating mycotoxins within distillate products can indeed be mitigated by a combination of prevention measures that include appropriate raw material selection, efficient fermentation conditions, enhanced distillation processes and vigilant observation [70]. While some studies suggest that barrel aging may reduce mycotoxin levels due to adsorption to the barrel wall, others suggest that contamination may occur due to barrel fungal spores. In order to reduce the risk of mycotoxins, care must be taken in the selection of materials and their storage [71]. Figure 1 illustrates the pathways of migration of mycotoxins, pesticides, and heavy metals into distilled spirits.
Various sources, including raw materials, brewing processes, equipment, bottling, aging, and storage contribute to the migration of metals into alcoholic beverages [72]. According to available research, the presence of metalloids and metals such as As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Sn, Pb, and Zn has been determined in distilled spirits. The analysis of commercially available spirits shown in Table 2 (palinka, whiskey, vodka, brandy, rum, gin, tequila, absinthe) reveals variability in heavy metal concentrations with Cu ranging from 0.0 to 15.3 mg/L and Ni up to 77.16 mg/L. In unrecorded palinka, significantly higher concentrations of Cu up to 51.6 mg/L and Zn up to 16.96 mg/L were recorded, indicating potential issues in the distillation process [4]. Since fertilizers, fungicides, pesticides, and mineral fertilizers affect the metal content of raw materials, they can affect the Cd, Cu, Mn, Pb, and Zn content of the final product. Studies have shown that Mn and Cu can come largely from the oak barrels in which the product is aged, as well as the oak chips used in aging [73].

8. Risk Assessment

Considering the different production methods and product properties, according to the Codex Alimentarius, alcoholic beverages can be classified into beer and malt beverages, ciders and perry, grape wines (still, sparkling, fortified, mead) and distilled spirituous beverages containing more than 15% alcohol [74]. Globally, about 50% of total alcohol consumption is consumed in the form of spirits. This shows that the total consumption of pure alcohol in the form of spirits is equal to the total consumption of other alcoholic beverages, and this is due to the great popularity of spirits and the high proportion of alcohol that is concentrated during the distillation process [3].
A key measure for risk management is certainly the establishment of MLs for chemical contaminants in food, where it is necessary to take into consideration the amount, toxicity, and concentration of contaminants in the consumed food. The mere nonconformity of the product does not mean, according to the principles of risk assessment, that the product is toxic, but in order to ensure effective protection of public health, it is necessary to prevent such products from entering the market or being used as ingredients in other food [3].
It is extremely important to identify potential hazards and emerging ones in all stages of the product, from production to consumption. Taking the example of pesticides, during the rapid growth of food production in the last few decades, they began to be used to control insects, weeds and fungi, and several pesticides are known to be harmful to both the environment and human health. It is very difficult to control pesticide residues for all input raw materials in the production of distilled spirits, so manufacturers periodically inspect randomly selected raw materials, some of which are imported from countries with low levels of control and safety standards [13]. Although numerous countries and organizations have established standards for pesticide residues in various foods, such as wheat, corn, barley, and grapes, which are regularly used in the production of spirits, only a few studies have conducted a risk assessment for pesticides in spirits (Table 2). At the end of the research conducted by Shin et al. [13], it was concluded that the risk of detecting pesticides in distilled spirits can be reduced with proper distillation.
When it comes to the problem of contamination with mycotoxins, cereals stored for a long period of time pose a great risk. Therefore, it is very important to ensure the safety and quality of the product, regardless of whether mycotoxins transfer from the contaminated raw material to the distilled spirit or not. According to the research conducted by Shin and Lee [28], it was concluded that the mycotoxins AFB1, DON, and ZEA were not detected in the distillate after single-stage distillation (Table 2), which means that regardless of the amount of contamination of the raw material with these mycotoxins, after fermentation and distillation, they will not remain in the distillate. Regarding the impact on raw material contamination, Lactobacillus and S. cerevisiae showed the ability to reduce the concentrations of AFB1, DON, FUM, T-2, and ZEA, with the most significant detoxification occurring within 6 h, and stabilization followed after 24 h. These strains of microorganisms show potential for use as food and feed additives to mitigate mycotoxin contamination [75]. Some of the novel strategies to protect against mycotoxins include the development of genetically modified crops resistant to mycotoxigenic fungi and innovative detoxification techniques such as enzymatic treatments and adsorption agents. Mycotoxins can be reduced in the final products by using these methods, thereby reducing the risk to public health [76]. In order to avoid contamination with mycotoxin, distilled beverage producers must implement stringent quality control practices. Maintaining product safety requires the implementation of HACCP plans that specifically address mycotoxin monitoring, testing, and compliance with regulatory guidelines. In order to avoid the migration of mycotoxins into final products, the industry may benefit further from advances in predictive modeling and risk assessment tools [77].
The presence of heavy metals from raw materials in spirits can be prevented by the distillation process. For example, Pb in spirits mostly migrates from equipment and containers during the production process, distribution, and storage [3,58].
Quality assurance in the field of food contaminant detection is evolving over time, so it is essential that in the coming years the focus is on further improving the sensitivity, selectivity, and speed of analytical methods. Various innovations such as portable and miniaturized analytical devices have enabled the analysis of contaminants at the point of origin, whether in the field, factories, or markets. Regardless of the previously mentioned innovations, high-performance liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (Table 3) will continue to be indispensable for the detection and quantification of known and unknown contaminants such as pesticides and mycotoxins at the trace level [78]. The most common techniques (Table 3) for testing trace metals in spirits are Electrothermal and Flame Spectroscorpy (ETAAS, FAAS), Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy and Mass Spectrometry (ICP-AES, ICP-MS), and electrochemical methods, but some publications include TXRF spectrometry for the determination of metals in distilled alcoholic beverages [63].
In order to ensure the change and establishment of quality standards based on scientific claims, it is important that the risk assessment is based on a comprehensive detection method, toxicological information, and technological measures, and most importantly, it must be applicable in risk management. Therefore, in order to support the making of important decisions in risk management, risk assessment must consolidate and evaluate the available scientific evidence in an objective, transparent, and appropriate way [81]. To establish standards in the spirit drinks production technology, it is recommended that risk assessment be combined with toxicological approaches, whereby it is necessary to expand the comprehensive scope of contaminant analyzes in order to avoid potential risks as successfully as possible. Also, it is important that quality control measures for incoming raw materials, fermentation, distillation, storage, and equipment are implemented effectively and used appropriately, as this is the only way to ensure the reduction in most contaminants [3]. According to these premises, the determination of certain contaminants in frequently consumed spirits is of great importance for the nutritional, toxicological and food safety fields [60].

9. Conclusions

The presence of pesticides, mycotoxins, and heavy metals in distilled alcoholic spirits remains a significant concern, especially in the context of climate change, environmental conditions, and production practices. While industrially produced distillates generally contain low levels of contamination, recent findings reviewed in this paper confirm the migration of certain pesticides, ochratoxin A, metalloids, and heavy metals during the distillation process, highlighting the need for continued vigilance. Particular attention should be paid to traditional and unregistered products, which may pose a higher risk due to inadequate equipment and insufficient regulatory oversight.
To ensure consumer safety and public health, future efforts should focus on strengthening regulations, improving quality control of raw materials, and optimizing production processes to minimize contamination risks. Advances in analytical techniques will be crucial in detecting contaminant residues with greater accuracy. In addition, further research is needed to understand the mechanisms of contaminant migration during distillation and to develop effective mitigation strategies. A multidisciplinary approach involving food safety, analytical chemistry, and regulatory enforcement will be essential to preserving the quality and safety of distilled alcoholic beverages.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.G. and T.R.; writing—review and editing, J.B. and A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
15-ADON15-acetyl-deoxynivalenol
3-ADON3-acetyl-deoxynivalenol
AFB1aflatoxin B1
AFB2aflatoxin B2
AFG1aflatoxin G1
AFG2aflatoxin G2
AFTaflatoxins
Asarsenic
Cdcadmium
Cocobalt
Crchromium
Cucopper
D3Gdeoxinyvalenol-3-glucoside
DONdeoxynivalenol
FB1fumonisin B1
Feiron
FUMfumonisins
Hgmercury
IARCInternational Agency for Research on Cancer
MCPA4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid
MLMaximum Level
Mnmanganese
MRLMaximum Residue Level
Ninickel
NIVnivalenol
OTAochratoxin A
PATpatulin
Pblead
Rfretention factor
SDHIsuccinate dehydrogenase inhibitors
Sntin
THPItetrahydrophthalimide
TLCthin-layer chromatography
ZEAzearalenone
Znzinc

References

  1. REGULATION (EU) 2019/787 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 April 2019 on the Definition, Description, Presentation and Labelling of Spirit Drinks, the Use of the Names of Spirit Drinks in the Presentation and Labelling of Other Foodstuffs, the Protection of Geographical Indications for Spirit Drinks, the Use of Ethyl Alcohol and Distillates of Agricultural Origin in Alcoholic Beverages, and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 110/2008. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ (accessed on 23 February 2025).
  2. He, N.X.; Bayen, S. An Overview of Chemical Contaminants and Other Undesirable Chemicals in Alcoholic Beverages and Strategies for Analysis. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 3916–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pang, X.N.; Li, Z.J.; Chen, J.Y.; Gao, L.J.; Han, B.Z. A Comprehensive Review of Spirit Drink Safety Standards and Regulations from an International Perspective. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pál, L.; Muhollari, T.; Bujdosó, O.; Baranyai, E.; Nagy, A.; Árnyas, E.; Ádány, R.; Sándor, J.; McKee, M.; Szűcs, S. Heavy Metal Contamination in Recorded and Unrecorded Spirits. Should We Worry? Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2020, 116, 104723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, J.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, B. Chinese Baijiu and Whisky: Research Reservoirs for Flavor and Functional Food. Foods 2023, 12, 2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stanzer, D.; Hanousek Čiča, K.; Blesić, M.; Smajić Murtić, M.; Mrvčić, J.; Spaho, N. Alcoholic Fermentation as a Source of Congeners in Fruit Spirits. Foods 2023, 12, 1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Carballo, D.; Fernández-Franzón, M.; Ferrer, E.; Pallarés, N.; Berrada, H. Dietary Exposure to Mycotoxins through Alcoholic and Non-Alcoholic Beverages in Valencia, Spain. Toxins 2021, 13, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rovetto, E.I.; Luz, C.; La Spada, F.; Meca, G.; Riolo, M.; Cacciola, S.O. Diversity of Mycotoxins and Other Secondary Metabolites Recovered from Blood Oranges Infected by Colletotrichum, Alternaria, and Penicillium Species. Toxins 2023, 15, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pleadin, J.; Zadravec, M.; Lešić, T.; Frece, J.; Markov, K.; Vasilj, V. Climate Change—A Potential Threat for Increasing Occurrences of Mycotoxins. Vet. Stanica 2020, 51, 659–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Petrović, E.; Ćosić, J.; Vrandečić, K.; Godena, S. Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Food and Beverages. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2023, 24, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rodríguez-Carrasco, Y.; Fattore, M.; Albrizio, S.; Berrada, H.; Mañes, J. Occurrence of Fusarium Mycotoxins and Their Dietary Intake through Beer Consumption by the European Population. Food Chem. 2015, 178, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shin, J.; Luo, Y. Relationship between Exposure to Multiple Heavy Metals and Depressive Symptoms in the US: The Impact of Alcohol Consumption. Heliyon 2024, 10, e40221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shin, J.A.; Cho, H.; Seo, D.W.; Jeong, H.G.; Kim, S.C.; Lee, J.H.; Hong, S.T.; Lee, K.T. Approach Study for Mass Balance of Pesticide Residues in Distillers’ Stillage along with Distillate and Absence Verification of Pesticides in Distilled Spirits from Pilot-Scale of Distillation Column. Molecules 2019, 24, 2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Urkude, R.; Dhurvey, V.; Kochhar, S. Pesticide Residues in Beverages. In Quality Control in the Beverage Industry: Volume 17: The Science of Beverages; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 529–560. ISBN 9780128166819. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wallace, D.R.; Buha Djordjevic, A. Heavy Metal and Pesticide Exposure: A Mixture of Potential Toxicity and Carcinogenicity. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2020, 19, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. REGULATION (EC) No 396/2005 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 February 2005 on Maximum Residue Levels of Pesticides in or on Food and Feed of Plant and Animal Origin and Amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC (Text with EEA Relevance). 2006. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ (accessed on 24 February 2025).
  17. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on Maximum Levels for Certain Contaminants in Food and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 (Text with EEA Relevance). 2023. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ (accessed on 25 February 2025).
  18. Berbegal, C.; Fragasso, M.; Russo, P.; Bimbo, F.; Grieco, F.; Spano, G.; Capozzi, V. Climate Changes and Food Quality: The Potential of Microbial Activities as Mitigating Strategies in the Wine Sector. Fermentation 2019, 5, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Velásquez, A.C.; Castroverde, C.D.M.; He, S.Y. Plant–Pathogen Warfare under Changing Climate Conditions. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28, R619–R634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Casu, A.; Camardo Leggieri, M.; Toscano, P.; Battilani, P. Changing Climate, Shifting Mycotoxins: A Comprehensive Review of Climate Change Impact on Mycotoxin Contamination. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2024, 23, e13323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kovač, M.; Bulaić, M.; Jakovljević, J.; Nevistić, A.; Rot, T.; Kovač, T.; Šarkanj, I.D.; Šarkanj, B. Mycotoxins, Pesticide Residues, and Heavy Metals Analysis of Croatian Cereals. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marasas, W.F.O.; Gelderblom, W.C.A.; Shephard, G.S.; Vismer, H.F. Mycotoxins: A Global Problem. In Mycotoxins: Detection Methods, Management, Public Health and Agricultural Trade; CABI Publishing: Oxfordshire, UK, 2008; pp. 29–39. ISBN 9781845930820. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fernández-Cruz, M.L.; Mansilla, M.L.; Tadeo, J.L. Mycotoxins in Fruits and Their Processed Products: Analysis, Occurrence and Health Implications. J. Adv. Res. 2010, 1, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moretti, A.; Pascale, M.; Logrieco, A.F. Mycotoxin Risks under a Climate Change Scenario in Europe. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 84, 38–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Magan, N.; Aldred, D. Post-Harvest Control Strategies: Minimizing Mycotoxins in the Food Chain. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 119, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Battilani, P.; Toscano, P.; Van Der Fels-Klerx, H.J.; Moretti, A.; Camardo Leggieri, M.; Brera, C.; Rortais, A.; Goumperis, T.; Robinson, T. Aflatoxin B1 Contamination in Maize in Europe Increases Due to Climate Change. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Inoue, T.; Nagatomi, Y.; Kinami, T.; Uyama, A.; Mochizuki, N. Fate of Pesticides in a Distilled Spirit of Barley Shochu during the Distillation Process. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2010, 74, 2518–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shin, J.A.; Lee, K.T. Migration Degree of Selected Mycotoxins in the Distillation Process and Their Determination in Distilled Spirits from Pilot-Scale Continuous Distillation. Foods 2023, 12, 4189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nagatomi, Y.; Inoue, T.; Uyama, A.; Mochizuki, N. The Fate of Mycotoxins during the Distillation Process of Barley Shochu, a Distilled Alcoholic Beverage. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2012, 76, 202–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Delcour, I.; Spanoghe, P.; Uyttendaele, M. Literature Review: Impact of Climate Change on Pesticide Use. Food Res. Int. 2015, 68, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Martínez-Megías, C.; Mentzel, S.; Fuentes-Edfuf, Y.; Moe, S.J.; Rico, A. Influence of Climate Change and Pesticide Use Practices on the Ecological Risks of Pesticides in a Protected Mediterranean Wetland: A Bayesian Network Approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 878, 163018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tsenang, M.; Pheko-ofitlhile, T.; Mokgadi, J.; Masamba, W.; Phokedi, G.N. A Validated ICP-MS Method for the Screening and Quantitative Analysis of Heavy Metal Contaminants in Home-Brewed Alcoholic Beverages of Botswana. Food Humanit. 2023, 1, 1125–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Witkowska, D.; Słowik, J.; Chilicka, K. Review Heavy Metals and Human Health: Possible Exposure Pathways and the Competition for Protein Binding Sites. Molecules 2021, 26, 6060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jeričević, A.; Ilyin, I.; Vidič, S. Modelling of Heavy Metals: Study of Impacts Due to Climate Change. NATO Sci. Peace Secur. Ser. C Environ. Secur. 2012, 125, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Udom, G.J.; Turyahabwe, B.; Aturamu, A.; Aziakpono, O.M.; Agbana, R.D.; Joseph, O.G.; Udom, N.W.G.; Mugide, N.; Odey, O.P.; Olot, H.; et al. Heavy Metal and Metalloid Pollution: A Systematic Review of Health Implications for Pregnant Women, Children, and Geriatrics in the East African Region. Environ. Adv. 2025, 19, 100620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ługowoj, S.; Balcerek, M. Traditional and New Raw Materials for Spirit Beverage Production. Acta Univ. Lodziensis. Folia Biol. Oecologica 2021, 17, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kovač, M.; Bulaić, M.; Nevistić, A.; Rot, T.; Babić, J.; Panjičko, M.; Kovač, T.; Šarkanj, B. Regulated Mycotoxin Occurrence and Co-Occurrence in Croatian Cereals. Toxins 2022, 14, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ostry, V.; Malir, F.; Toman, J.; Grosse, Y. Mycotoxins as Human Carcinogens—The IARC Monographs Classification. Mycotoxin Res. 2017, 33, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tran, T.M.; Ameye, M.; Phan, L.T.K.; Devlieghere, F.; De Saeger, S.; Eeckhout, M.; Audenaert, K. Post-Harvest Contamination of Maize by Fusarium Verticillioides and Fumonisins Linked to Traditional Harvest and Post-Harvest Practices: A Case Study of Small-Holder Farms in Vietnam. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 339, 109022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wan, J.; Chen, B.; Rao, J. Occurrence and Preventive Strategies to Control Mycotoxins in Cereal-Based Food. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 928–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ostry, V.; Malir, F.; Ruprich, J. Producers and Important Dietary Sources of Ochratoxin A and Citrinin. Toxins 2013, 5, 1574–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Al-Anati, L.; Petzinger, E. Immunotoxic Activity of Ochratoxin A. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 2006, 29, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Więckowska, M.; Cichon, N.; Szelenberger, R.; Gorniak, L.; Bijak, M. Ochratoxin A and Its Role in Cancer Development: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers 2024, 16, 3473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abbas, A.; Yli-Mattila, T. Biocontrol of Fusarium Graminearum, a Causal Agent of Fusarium Head Blight of Wheat, and Deoxynivalenol Accumulation: From In Vitro to In Planta. Toxins 2022, 14, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kovač, M.; Šubarić, D.; Bulaić, M.; Kovač, T.; Šarkanj, B. Yesterday Masked, Today Modified; What Do Mycotoxins Bring Next? Arch. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 2018, 69, 196–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Oluwakayode, A.; Greer, B.; Meneely, J.; Berthiller, F.; Krska, R.; Medina, A. Impact of Environmental Conditions on the Concentrations of Trichothecenes, Their Glucosides, and Emerging Fusarium Toxins in Naturally Contaminated, Irradiated, and Fusarium Langsethiae Inoculated Oats. Toxins 2024, 16, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Balló, A.; Busznyákné Székvári, K.; Czétány, P.; Márk, L.; Török, A.; Szántó, Á.; Máté, G. Estrogenic and Non-Estrogenic Disruptor Effect of Zearalenone on Male Reproduction: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ropejko, K.; Twarużek, M. Zearalenone and Its Metabolites—General Overview, Occurrence, and Toxicity. Toxins 2021, 13, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gurikar, C.; Mary George, M.; Gurikar, C. Patulin: A Potentially Harmful Food Contaminant. Artic. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2022, 10, 11–18. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhao, Y.; Xu, W.; Liu, R.; Guo, L.; Liu, P. Determination and Analysis of Patulin in Apples, Hawthorns, and Their Products by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Mycotoxin Res. 2024, 40, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Spaho, N. Distillation Techniques in the Fruit Spirits Production. In Distillation—Innovative Applications and Modeling; InTech: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  52. Philippe, V.; Neveen, A.; Marwa, A.; Ahmad Basel, A.Y. Occurrence of Pesticide Residues in Fruits and Vegetables for the Eastern Mediterranean Region and Potential Impact on Public Health. Food Control 2021, 119, 107457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Grewal, A.S.; Singla, A.; Kamboj, P.; Dua, J.S. Pesticide Residues in Food Grains, Vegetables and Fruits: A Hazard to Human Health. J. Med. Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 2, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Aktar, W.; Sengupta, D.; Chowdhury, A. Impact of Pesticides Use in Agriculture: Their Benefits and Hazards. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2009, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Maksymiv, I. Pesticides: Benefits and Hazards. J. Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian Natl. Univ. 2015, 2, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kowalska, G.; Pankiewicz, U.; Kowalski, R. Assessment of Pesticide Content in Apples and Selected Citrus Fruits Subjected to Simple Culinary Processing. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Izah, S.C.; Inyang, I.R.; Angaye, T.C.N.; Okowa, I.P. A Review of Heavy Metal Concentration and Potential Health Implications of Beverages Consumed in Nigeria. Toxics 2017, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bansal, O.P. Health Impacts of the Potentially Toxic Metals Present in Milk, Dairy Products, Chocolates, Alcoholic and Non-Alcoholic Beverages: A Review. IOSR J. Environ. Sci. 2020, 14, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zoroddu, M.A.; Aaseth, J.; Crisponi, G.; Medici, S.; Peana, M.; Nurchi, V.M. The Essential Metals for Humans: A Brief Overview. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2019, 195, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Fernández-López, L.; Gómez-Nieto, B.; Gismera, M.J.; Sevilla, M.T.; Procopio, J.R. Direct Determination of Copper and Zinc in Alcoholic and Non-Alcoholic Drinks Using High-Resolution Continuum Source Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry and Internal Standardization. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2018, 147, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ince, M.; Kaplan Ince, O.; Onal, A. Exposure to Copper and Risk Assessment for Human Health via Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Iwegbue, C.M.A.; Ojelum, A.L.; Bassey, F.I. A Survey of Metal Profiles in Some Traditional Alcoholic Beverages in Nigeria. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 2, 724–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Siviero, G.; Cinosi, A.; Monticelli, D.; Seralessandri, L. Determination of Trace Metals in Spirits by Total Reflection X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2018, 144, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Muhollari, T.; Szűcs, S.; Sajtos, Z.; McKee, M.; Baranyai, E.; Ádány, R.; Pál, L. Heavy Metals in Unrecorded Albanian Rakia: A Pilot Study on a Potential Public Health Risk. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pelegrín, C.J.; Flores, Y.; Jiménez, A.; Garrigós, M.C. Recent Trends in the Analysis of Chemical Contaminants in Beverages. Beverages 2020, 6, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, C.Y.; Aggarwal, S.K.; Chung, C.H.; You, C.F. Advanced Mass Spectrometry for Beverage Safety and Forensic. In Safety Issues in Beverage Production: Volume 18: The Science of Beverages; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 223–269. ISBN 9780128166796. [Google Scholar]
  67. Yigit, N.; Velioglu, Y.S. Effects of Processing and Storage on Pesticide Residues in Foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 3622–3641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Raters, M.; Matissek, R. Thermal Stability of Aflatoxin B1 and Ochratoxin A. Mycotoxin Res. 2008, 24, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Pietri, A.; Bertuzzi, T.; Agosti, B.; Donadini, G. Transfer of Aflatoxin B1 and Fumonisin B1 from Naturally Contaminated Raw Materials to Beer during an Industrial Brewing Process. Food Addit. Contam. —Part A 2010, 27, 1431–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Inoue, T.; Nagatomi, Y.; Uyama, A.; Mochizuki, N. Fate of Mycotoxins during Beer Brewing and Fermentation. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2013, 77, 1410–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Wolf-Hall, C.E. Mold and Mycotoxin Problems Encountered during Malting and Brewing. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 119, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ibanez, J.G.; Carreon-Alvarez, A.; Barcena-Soto, M.; Casillas, N. Metals in Alcoholic Beverages: A Review of Sources, Effects, Concentrations, Removal, Speciation, and Analysis. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2008, 21, 672–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Muntean, N.; Frențiu, T.; Rákos, G.; Covaci, E. The Influence of the Distillation Process on the Content of Metals in Home- And Industrially-Brewed Alcoholic Beverages—Risk Assessment to Human Health. Stud. Univ. Babes-Bolyai Chem. 2022, 67, 215–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Codex Alimentarius, General Standard for Food Additives Codex STAN 192-1995, 8 July 1995. 1995. Available online: https://www.fao.org/ (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  75. Chlebicz, A.; Śliżewska, K. In Vitro Detoxification of Aflatoxin B1, Deoxynivalenol, Fumonisins, T-2 Toxin and Zearalenone by Probiotic Bacteria from Genus Lactobacillus and Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Yeast. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2020, 12, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Streit, E.; Naehrer, K.; Rodrigues, I.; Schatzmayr, G. Mycotoxin Occurrence in Feed and Feed Raw Materials Worldwide: Long-Term Analysis with Special Focus on Europe and Asia. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 2892–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bennett, J.W.; Klich, M. Mycotoxins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 497–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Louppis, A.P.; Kontominas, M.G. Recent Developments (2020–2023) on the Use of LC in the Determination of Food Contaminants. Separations 2024, 11, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Brouziotis, A.A.; Heise, S.; Saviano, L.; Zhang, K.; Giarra, A.; Bau, M.; Tommasi, F.; Guida, M.; Libralato, G.; Trifuoggi, M. Levels of Rare Earth Elements on Three Abandoned Mining Sites of Bauxite in Southern Italy: A Comparison between TXRF and ICP-MS. Talanta 2024, 275, 126093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Janik, E.; Niemcewicz, M.; Podogrocki, M.; Ceremuga, M.; Gorniak, L.; Stela, M.; Bijak, M. The Existing Methods and Novel Approaches in Mycotoxins’ Detection. Molecules 2021, 26, 3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Dearfield, K.L.; Hoelzer, K.; Kause, J.R. Review of Various Approaches for Assessing Public Health Risks in Regulatory Decision Making: Choosing the Right Approach for the Problem. J. Food Prot. 2014, 77, 1428–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of contaminant migration.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of contaminant migration.
Foods 14 01303 g001
Table 2. Contamination and migration of pesticides, mycotoxins, and heavy metals in distilled spirits.
Table 2. Contamination and migration of pesticides, mycotoxins, and heavy metals in distilled spirits.
Type of Spirit BeverageRaw MaterialAnalyteSpike (mg/L)Conc. in Distillate (mg/L)Literature
SakeFermented rice bran powderTerbufos0.02ND 2[13]
0.040.0018
Iprobenfon0.28ND
Fenthion0.140.0024
0.330.01
Flutolanil1.270.01
Ethoprophos0.350.05
Pb10ND
Cd10ND
AFB10.04ND[28]
OTA0.020.00019
DON4ND
ZEA0.8ND
Barley shochuFermented barley mashPAT0.05ND[29]
NIV0.05ND
DON0.05ND
AFG20.01ND
AFG10.01ND
AFB20.01ND
AFB10.01ND
HT-20.05ND
T-20.05ND
ZEA0.05ND
FB10.05ND
OTA0.05ND
FB20.05ND
Cycloate0.050.022 1[27]
Cadusafos0.050.009 1
Diallate0.050.015 1
Ethoprophos0.050.015 1
Thiometon0.050.012 1
Terbufos0.050.008 1
Recorded spirits (n = 97):
Palinka (n = 25), whiskey (n = 21), vodka (n = 16), brandy (n = 18), rum (n = 6), artificially flavored spirits (n = 5), gin (n = 3), tequila (n = 2),
absinthe (n = 1)
-Copper-0.0–15.3[4]
Cobalt-0.0–0.31
Chromium-0.0–0.71
Iron-0.0–34.63
Manganese-0.0–3.38
Nickel-0.0–77.16
Zinc-0.0–7.49
Tin-0.0–3.47
Unrecorded spirits (n = 100):
Palinka
-Copper-0.0–51.60
Iron-0.0–11.91
Manganese-0.0–0.79
Nickel-0.0–6.86
Zinc-0.0–16.96
Tin-0.0–4.10
1 Calculated according to the formula (transfer ratio (%) = (each pesticide’s conc. (µg/L) × 90 mL) × 100/(50 µg/L × 200 mL)). 2 Not detected.
Table 3. Comparison of instrumental techniques for the analysis of investigated contaminants.
Table 3. Comparison of instrumental techniques for the analysis of investigated contaminants.
ContaminantsAnalysis MethodsAdvantagesDisadvantagesLiterature
Heavy metalsICP/MS, ICP/OESHigh sensitivity, ability to analyze multiple elements simultaneouslyHigh operating costs, high argon consumption, complex sample prep, time-consuming[65,79]
TXRFFast, low cost, minimal sample preparation, for high-concentration samplesHigh detection limits, spectral interferences, less precise for trace elements
GFAASImproved sensitivity, lower detection limitsComplex sample preparation, slower analysis
FAASFast analysis, relatively low costLower sensitivity compared to other techniques
PesticidesGC/MS, GC/MS/MSHigh sensitivity, good separationRequires extensive sample preparation, expensive equipment
HPLC/MS, HPLC/MS/MSExcellent selectivity, suitable for complex matricesHigh operational costs, potential matrix interferences
MycotoxinsHPLC-FLD/UV/MSHigh sensitivity, allows simultaneous detection of multiple mycotoxins, applicable for various matricesRequires derivatization for some mycotoxins, expensive equipment, complex sample preparation[80]
LC-MS/MS High selectivity and sensitivity, reliable identification, applicable to complex matricesHigh operational costs, requires highly trained personnel
ELISA Fast and simple screening method, enables high-throughput testing, requires low sample volume and minimal clean-upMatrix interferences may affect accuracy, requires thorough validation for different food matrices
LFIA Simple, fast results, low cost, suitable for large-scale on-site screening, no need for sample clean-upPotential interferences, limited sensitivity for trace analytes
BiosensorsHigh sensitivity, real-time detection, possibility of multi-toxin analysis, portable, suitable for on-site testingMatrix interference, antibody cross-reactivity, necessity of matrices’ validation
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rot, T.; Gavran, S.; Babić, J.; Lončarić, A. Occurrence of Pesticides, Mycotoxins, and Heavy Metals in Distilled Alcoholic Beverages: A Review of Contaminants and Health Risks. Foods 2025, 14, 1303. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14081303

AMA Style

Rot T, Gavran S, Babić J, Lončarić A. Occurrence of Pesticides, Mycotoxins, and Heavy Metals in Distilled Alcoholic Beverages: A Review of Contaminants and Health Risks. Foods. 2025; 14(8):1303. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14081303

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rot, Tomislav, Sunčana Gavran, Jurislav Babić, and Ante Lončarić. 2025. "Occurrence of Pesticides, Mycotoxins, and Heavy Metals in Distilled Alcoholic Beverages: A Review of Contaminants and Health Risks" Foods 14, no. 8: 1303. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14081303

APA Style

Rot, T., Gavran, S., Babić, J., & Lončarić, A. (2025). Occurrence of Pesticides, Mycotoxins, and Heavy Metals in Distilled Alcoholic Beverages: A Review of Contaminants and Health Risks. Foods, 14(8), 1303. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14081303

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop