Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Wines from Vitis amurensis Varieties in Xinjiang, China
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic and Transcriptomic Dissection of Growth Characteristics and Exopolysaccharide-Related Bioactivities in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NMGL2
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrative Comparison of Variations in Taste, Aroma, and Sensory Characteristics Among Four Sweet Cherry Cultivars to Explore Quality Differences During Storage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chill or Thrill? The Effect of Storage Temperature Regime on Listeria Growth in Fresh-Cut Fruit Cocktails

by
Beatrix W. Alsanius
*,
Sofia Windstam
and
Emina Mulaosmanovic
Subject Area Microbial Horticulture, Department of Biosystems and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 190, SE23422 Lomma, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(20), 3523; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14203523
Submission received: 19 August 2025 / Revised: 26 September 2025 / Accepted: 14 October 2025 / Published: 16 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Postharvest Storage and Preservation Technologies for Agri-Food)

Abstract

Fresh-cut fruit salads (fruit cocktails) are marketed as a convenient food item with a limited shelf-life (4 days at 4 °C). Given rising electricity prices, increased cooling temperature during production, transport, and retail from 4 °C to 8 °C and extended shelf-life from four to eight days without compromising food safety are discussed. This study investigates the proliferation of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat (RTE) fresh-cut fruit cocktails at three temperature regimes. The fruit cocktail, consisting of pineapple, red apples, cantaloupe, and red grapes, was inoculated with a clinical strain of L. monocytogenes (SLV 444; CCUG 69007) and stored at 4 °C, 8 °C, or a dynamic temperature regime (4 °C for one day, 8 °C for seven days). After four-day storage at 4 °C, growth of L. monocytogenes was not supported. Despite the fruit cocktail’s pH below the minimum requirements of the target organism, all other treatments supported growth of L. monocytogenes, but below the legal limit of 2 log CFU + 1 g−1 per fruit cocktail. There is an increased risk of exceeding the microbiological safety end product criteria, especially at 8 °C or dynamic storage temperatures, if seemingly insignificant Listeria contamination is present in or on fruit cocktail ingredients.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Fruits and vegetables are integral components of a healthy diet, offering a rich source of fiber, bioactive compounds, and essential minerals. Ready-to-eat (RTE) fresh-cut fruits, including single fruits and mixed fruit cocktails, have gained popularity due to their convenience and alignment with modern lifestyles [1,2] and support to reach a daily recommended intake of 500 g of fruits and vegetables. These products are commonly marketed in retail outlets, fast food chains, and institutional kitchens, where they undergo centralized preparation and distribution [3].
Although pre-cut fruits are often washed before preparation to remove visible contaminants, they are not subjected to further microbial decontamination methods (e.g., heat treatment or chemical disinfectants), making them susceptible to microbial contamination. A key concern is the presence of Listeria monocytogenes, a psychrotrophic bacterium that can thrive at low temperatures, posing significant food safety risks. Like other human pathogens, L. monocytogenes can proliferate in nutrient-rich fruit juices and on mechanically damaged tissue, such as the surfaces created during fruit slicing [4]. The rapid growth of L. monocytogenes on fresh-cut fruit can lead to spoilage and increase the risk of listeriosis, particularly for vulnerable populations, including the elderly, pregnant women, and immunocompromised individuals [5].
To mitigate these risks, maintaining a consistent cold chain throughout preparation, transport, and storage of fresh-cut fruit is critical. Refrigeration slows both microbial growth and fruit tissue degradation, thus prolonging shelf-life and reducing the likelihood of contamination [6,7]. Growth of L. monocytogenes is influenced by multiple factors, including the fruit type, ripeness, and the degree of mechanical damage [8,9]. Previous studies have shown that refrigeration at 4–5 °C significantly slows the growth of Listeria spp. and temperatures >8 °C may favor bacterial proliferation [10]. However, data on the interplay between temperature, fruit composition, and Listeria growth remains sparse, particularly for mixed fruit cocktails that incorporate multiple fruit types with varying susceptibilities to microbial contamination.
The present study explores the effect of different cooling regimes (4 °C; 8 °C; 4 °C during day 1 and 8 °C during the remaining time, hereafter called “dynamic (temperature) regime” or of “4 → 8 °C-regime”) on the growth of L. monocytogenes in industrially processed fresh-cut fruit cocktails, assessing how varying temperature scenarios influence its growth potential. L. monocytogenes was chosen as the model strain, as it naturally occurs on and in fruit and vegetables, survives and grows at low temperatures, and has caused outbreaks related to the consumption of cantaloupe [11] and apples [12]. The study was initiated by the fresh-cut processing industry and retailers concerned about rising energy costs and wondering about viable options for elevated temperature post-processing from 4 °C to 8 °C without compromising food safety. We hypothesized that (i) the an increase in storage temperature of fresh fruit cocktail from 4 °C to 8 °C significantly increases the occurrence of L. monocytogenes in fresh-cut fruit cocktails, (ii) that a middle ground agreement using a dynamic regime does not hamper the model organism’s proliferation, and (iii) that an extension of the recommended storage period can be extended from 4 days to 8 days supports the growth potential of L. monocytogenes in fresh-cut fruit cocktails.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Inoculum Preparation

A clinical strain of L. monocytogenes (SLV 444; CCUG 69007 available at the Culture Collection University of Gothenburg) labeled with spontaneous rifampicin resistance (200 µg mL−1) was used [13], and comparability in growth behavior with the wild type strain was confirmed. For inoculum preparation, the strain was subcultured twice: at 30 °C for 24 h, followed by low temperature growth at 8 °C for 36 h in Tryptone Soy Broth (TSB; BD Bacto Tryptic Soy Broth, Thermo Fisher, Waltham MA, USA) [13]. The cell culture was washed by repeated centrifugation (4 °C) and resuspension of the pellet in a 0.85% saline solution. The density of the stock solution was set to an optical density of OD620 0.320 and then diluted, taking into account the expected fruit weight in the boxes (175 g). The total number of CFU of L. monocytogenes in each tray was Log 5.24 CFU, corresponding to Log 3 CFU g−1 fruit.

2.2. Experiment

The challenge study was conducted using film-sealed plastic PET trays containing 175 g of fresh-cut fruit cocktails (red apples, red grapes, cantaloupe, pineapple; no additives) packaged by a fresh-cut processing company directly before the onset of the experiment (Vidinge AB, Kävlinge, Sweden). Aliquots of 1 mL of inoculum were injected into each of the packages without breaking the package integrity. Control treatment fresh-cut fruit cocktails were mock inoculated with 1 mL of sterile NaCl (0.85%) [14]. The fresh-cut fruit cocktail packages with and without inoculation were placed at 4 °C and 8 °C and stored for eight days. The study was conducted with three temperature regimes, of which the first two follow the procedure of EURL guidance document [14] and the third one was suggested of special interest by the industry:
-
Treatment 1: 4 °C for eight days;
-
Treatment 2: 8 °C for eight days;
-
Treatment 3: 4 °C for one day followed by 8 °C for the remaining storage time totaling eight days (dynamic temperature regime).

2.3. Analyses

The sampling schedule is presented in Table 1. For the analysis, the fruit cocktail from each box was divided for microbiological analysis, water activity analysis, and biochemical analysis. The controls were analyzed only on day 0 and day 8. For experimental reasons (infection control), pH was determined only on day 0 and day 8 in fruit taken from non-inoculated fruit cocktail packages [14].

2.3.1. Microbiological Analyses

For the microbiological analysis, 25 g of fruit cocktail was weighed into filter bags and homogenized using a stomacher for 1 min at high speed (step 3). Samples were sedimented for 2 min. All liquid filtered through the filter bag membrane was then transferred into individual test tubes and centrifuged at 3200 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded, while the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL TRIS buffer [15] and then serially diluted in NaCl (0.85%) prior to plating dilutions on L. monocytogenes Harlequin™ Listeria Chromogenic Agar (Neogen, Lansing, MI, USA) supplemented with rifampicin (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), conditions enabling selective growth of the bacterium. The general microbiota was assessed on TSB supplemented with 1.5% Bacto Agar by plating dilutions [13,14]. The presence of yeasts on yeast–malt agar was also analyzed ad hoc. Incubation temperature and duration are reported in Table 2. Samples were analyzed with three parallel replicates per fruit cocktail.

2.3.2. Water Activity

Water activity (aw) was measured using the AquaLab Pre (Meter Group, Pullman, WA, USA), and water activity, temperature, and day point were recorded [13]. The instrument was calibrated before the first analysis for the day of analysis and after every 10 samples against two relevant standards (0.984; 1.000).

2.3.3. Biochemical Analyses

Analyses of pH, titrable acidity, and total soluble solids were analyzed according to Ali et al. [16]. Briefly, pH and titrable acidity (TA) were determined using titration unit (Titroline easy; SCHOTT Instr. GmbH, Mainz, Germany); 100 mM NaOH to endpoint pH 8.3. TA values are shown as % citric acid w/w. Total soluble solids (TSS) were assessed using temperature-adjusted refractometer RFM 80 (Bellingham Stanley Ltd., Nottingham, UK).

2.3.4. Calculation

Results on CFU were adjusted for weight and log-transformed (log10 + 1). The mean of each fruit cocktail was used for the statistical analysis. The growth parameters were calculated according to Equations (1)–(5) [14,17], namely for
Number of generations (n).
N = N 0   2 n
With N expressing the final number of bacteria, N0 indicating the initial number of bacteria, and n depicting the number of generations.
Generation time (g).
g = t n
With g indicating generation time, t expressing the time interval (h), and n depicting the number of generations.
Specific growth rate (k).
k = 0.301 × t n = 0.301 g
With g indicating generation time, t expressing the time interval (h), and n depicting the number of generations and k for the specific growth rate, which corresponds to the slope of the curve.
Division rate (v).
v = 1 g
With v and g expressing the division rate and number of generations, respectively.
Growth potential (δ).
δ = log N log N 0
With N indicating the final number of bacteria ((log CFU + 1) g−1 fruit) and N0 expressing the initial number of bacteria ((log CFU + 1) g−1 fruit)).
The experiment was conducted with six individual replicates per treatment and sampling event. Results were statistically analyzed using ANOVA (general linear model and one-way ANOVA, respectively) followed by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05) (Minitab version 19.20.20 and R version 4.2.2). The growth of L. monocytogenes (LogCFU + 1 (g fruit)−1) over all experimental days was analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to test the effect of temperature regime separately within each sampling day (dpi). For each time point, Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test was performed to determine pairwise differences among temperature treatments. Statistical analyses were conducted in R (version 4.2.2) using the aov() function for ANOVA and HSD.test() from the agricolae package for Tukey’s post hoc comparisons.

3. Results

3.1. Impact of Temperature Regime on L. monocytogenes

After 8 days of storage, L. monocytogenes proliferated under all tested temperature regimes, with significantly slower growth at 4 °C compared to both continuous 8 °C and a dynamic regime (4 °C for 1 day followed by 8 °C for 7 days). At 4 °C, L. monocytogenes levels remained stable for up to 5 days and increased by less than 0.5 (log CFU + 1) g−1 by day 8. Notably, within the recommended 4-day shelf-life, no growth was observed at 4 °C, indicating limited risk under proper cold chain conditions (Figure 1 and Figure 2, Supplementary Tables S1 and S2).
Conversely, elevated temperatures supported growth, with increases of 1.37 (log CFU + 1) g−1 at 8 °C and 1.23 (log CFU + 1) g−1 under the dynamic regime. After 4 days, L. monocytogenes growth potential was higher in the dynamic treatment (0.99 (log CFU + 1) g−1) than at 8 °C (0.82 (log + 1 CFU) g−1), though variability among replicates (inter-package) under dynamic conditions was high. Significant differences in Listeria counts were evident from early time points (day 3 and 4), with both elevated regimes yielding >10-fold increases by day 8.
Temperature strongly influenced growth kinetics (Table 3): The doubling time at 4 °C was 13.68 h, compared to 5.42 h at 8 °C and 4.39 h under dynamic conditions, thus 2.5 and >3 times faster at abuse temperature regime. Dynamic temperature exposure notably accelerated L. monocytogenes proliferation relative to constant 8 °C, underscoring the risk posed by temperature abuse during storage and distribution.

3.2. Impact of Temperature Regime on Heterotrophic Organisms

Heterotrophic bacteria were analyzed only on day 0 (immediately after the start of the experiment) and day 8 (at the end of the experiment) in both inoculated and uninoculated fruit cocktails (Figure 1). Significant growth of heterotrophic bacteria was detected in all treatments (Figure 1, Table 3). Growth was significantly lower in fresh-cut fruit cocktails stored at 4 °C than when exposed to 8 °C and the dynamic temperature regime. The incidence of heterotrophs was slightly, but not significantly, lower in fresh-cut fruit cocktails inoculated with L. monocytogenes. Also, for heterotrophic bacteria, less time was needed for doubling when the sealed trays were stored at 8 °C compared to continuous regime at 4 °C. The difference was not as striking as for L. monocytogenes. The rate of multiplication was slower in the presence of L. monocytogenes.
The presence of yeasts was therefore evaluated ad hoc on day 8, and the results are shown in Figure 1. Significant differences in yeast incidence were found between fresh-cut fruit cocktails stored continuously at 4 °C and the other two temperature regimes. The occurrence of yeasts was highest when fresh-cut fruit cocktails had been stored continuously at 8 °C. Significant differences between the dynamic and continuous 8 °C treatments were only observed in fresh-cut fruit cocktails free from L. monocytogenes. When yeast levels were compared between fresh-cut fruit cocktails with and without the addition of L. monocytogenes, a trend towards lower yeast levels were observed in the presence of Listeria.

3.3. Abiotic Factors

Abiotic factors (pH, water activity, titrable acidity, and total soluble solids) essential for the growth of L. monocytogenes are presented in Table 4. No significant differences were observed for pH and water activity for any of the temperature regimes between the two readings. Total soluble solid values decreased in all regimes between the start and end of the experiment, but significant differences were only observed at a constant or dynamic storage temperature of 8 °C.

4. Discussion

Refrigeration is essential for extending the shelf-life of fresh-cut fruit cocktails by slowing both natural degradation and microbial growth. Fruit tissue degradation and microbial spoilage are closely linked. The processing-induced (e.g., slicing, dicing) “wounds” release juices and increase surface area, creating favorable conditions for microbial proliferation [2,18] including pathogens such as L. monocytogenes and spoilage microorganisms. Given its real-world scenario, the present challenge study provides a novel perspective relevant for the processing industry but also for distribution, retailers and consumers.
L. monocytogenes, a psychrotrophic bacterium capable of multiplying at temperatures as low as −1.5 °C [14], can rapidly colonize such fruit tissue. This coupled with its facultative anaerobic nature and tolerance to high water activity and salt concentrations, makes it particularly challenging to control in refrigerated fruit products [4,19]. Various studies have considered the fate of L. monocytogenes in single fresh-cut fruit items (e.g., apple [20,21,22], cantaloupe [20,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29], grape [20], mango [27], papaya [30,31], pear [30], pineapple [20,30], and watermelon [30,31]), whereas challenge studies using fresh-cut fruit cocktails are rare. The fruit cocktail used in this study consisted of a mix of red apples, red grapes, pineapple, and cantaloupe (without additives), a matrix dense in organic nutrients but heterogenous in pH as well as the porosity and surface density of the cut surfaces, thus providing microenvironments permissive to proliferation of the target organism. This heterogenicity in matrix should be taken into account when considering intra-package variations.
This study set out to test three primary hypotheses regarding the behavior of L. monocytogenes in fresh-cut fruit cocktails: (i) that increasing storage temperature from 4 °C to 8 °C significantly enhances pathogen proliferation; (ii) that a dynamic storage regime—initial cold storage followed by moderate temperature elevation—permits similar growth; and (iii) that extending the storage period from four to eight days supports pathogen development. The findings offer robust support for all three hypotheses and provide mechanistic insight into how subtle deviations in refrigeration parameters can affect microbial safety in RTE fruit matrices. Our study employed a cold-adapted inoculum grown under nutrient-rich conditions [25,32] in order to mimic real-world conditions where L. monocytogenes is pre-exposed to environmental stressors before contaminating produce. It is worthwhile to note that the present study is based on one fresh-cut fruit cocktail mix and one clinical L. monocytogenes strain and needs to be verified in provocation studies involving a diversity of fruit cocktail mixes and additional strains [33].

4.1. Effect of Temperature Increase (4 °C to 8 °C)

Our results confirm that L. monocytogenes does not proliferate under strict refrigeration at 4 °C within a four-day period. This aligns with established literature indicating that low temperatures impose significant metabolic constraints on the organism [20,30]. However, measurable growth occurred at 8 °C—a temperature frequently encountered during distribution or in domestic refrigerators—validating our first hypothesis. Reaching levels above the 2 log CFU g−1 threshold within 3–4 days of storage at 8 °C suggests that even slight increases in temperature can accelerate microbial risks, particularly for vulnerable populations such as the elderly and immunocompromised individuals [5]. Previous studies similarly reported log-scale increases in Listeria populations at mild temperature abuse conditions, including on fresh-cut cantaloupe and mixed fruit matrices [25,26,29].

4.2. The Impact of Dynamic Temperature Regime

We also examined a simulated middle-ground approach involving dynamic storage (4 °C for 24 h followed by 7 days at 8 °C). This treatment supported L. monocytogenes proliferation to the same extent as constant 8 °C exposure, confirming the second hypothesis. Notably, even short initial refrigeration did not prevent growth once temperature increased. This scenario is realistic for modern cold chains where initial compliance is often followed by later-stage lapses during retail or consumer handling [34,35]. Our results clearly state that such a temperature regime by the processing industry viewed as a compromise to please energy cost concerns during distribution and retail adventures food safety. This has also been demonstrated in provocations using exclusively cantaloupe, where similar growth curves were presented [20].
Given its psychrotrophic nature, L. monocytogenes is able to survive low-temperature conditions and resume growth when suitable conditions are re-established. These findings mirror previous experimental results showing the target organism’s ability to recover and proliferate after intermittent exposure to temperature abuse, including brief exposures as short as four hours at 8–20 °C [24,28].

4.3. The Effect of Shelf-Life Extension (From Four to Eight Days of Storage)

Extending the shelf-life from four to eight days facilitated further pathogen development under both constant and dynamic temperature regimes, supporting our third hypothesis. Although population levels remained below the EU safety threshold of 2 log CFU g−1 [36], the risk of exceeding these limits under less controlled real-world scenarios is substantial. Other studies have shown similar trends, where Listeria reached critical levels over 7–15 days in cantaloupe and mixed fruit samples, even under refrigeration [23,26,37].
These results reinforce the principle that the duration of storage time is an enabling factor for L. monocytogenes proliferation—especially when coupled with permissive environmental conditions. For industry stakeholders considering shelf-life extensions, this highlights the importance of verifying that time-based decisions do not compromise microbiological safety margins. The findings are also important for consumers and storage in kitchen refrigerators with oscillating cooling conditions, and prolonged storage may be supportive for the growth of L. monocytogenes.

4.4. Growth Mechanisms Under Adverse Conditions

While the fruit cocktail exhibited an average pH below the known minimum for L. monocytogenes growth, we nonetheless observed measurable proliferation. This paradox might be explained by known acid tolerance mechanisms, nutrient release from damaged fruit tissues, and the protective effect of food matrices [38]. It is tempting to speculate that cantaloupe was implicated as a high-risk component in the studied fruit cocktail matrix, as it was cited in multiple studies with respect to log increases exceeding 3.0 within one week at abusive temperatures [24,25].
These findings also underscore the limitations of pH as a standalone safety metric. The presence of spatial heterogeneity, localized buffering, and inter-fruit interactions in mixed salads means that Listeria can exploit microenvironments despite globally inhospitable conditions.

4.5. Microbial Behavior and Food Safety Concerns

Although not explicitly hypothesized, this challenge study also followed up on the heterotrophic microbiota, demonstrating a clear temperature-dependent response in heterotrophic bacterial proliferation within fresh-cut fruit cocktails and supporting prior findings on spoilage organisms [39,40,41]. These results, beautifully illustrated by the smell and package metamorphosis, reinforce the importance of strict cold chain control in limiting microbial growth in minimally processed fruit products. Despite the challenges posed by L. monocytogenes, it should be noted that outbreaks related to fruit products remain rare. For example, the incidence of L. monocytogenes in fruit was found to be just 0.51% in a Canadian study [42], and in Switzerland, no L. monocytogenes was detected in 64 samples of fresh-cut fruit [43]. Nevertheless, although log 2 proliferation was not exceeded in any of the treatments, our findings demonstrate how narrow the safety margin is under less-than-optimal conditions. This, in combination with the repeated isolation of L. monocytogenes from different zones in fresh-cut processing facilities highlights that the problem per se may not be ignored [44]. Also, the severity of listeriosis, which can result in severe outcomes such as meningitis and sepsis in vulnerable populations, remains a significant public health concern [14,34]. The high mortality rate and the potential for transmission to pregnant women highlight the importance of maintaining strict food safety protocols, particularly for high-risk consumers.
Thus, food safety policies should go beyond endpoint testing and incorporate proactive risk mitigation strategies. These include real-time temperature monitoring, conservative shelf-life determination, consumer education, and the application of hurdle technologies. Regulatory reliance solely on compliance with fixed microbial limits may provide false reassurance if cold chain integrity is not maintained throughout the product life cycle.

5. Conclusions and Practical Implications

In conclusion, the present study validates all three hypotheses. While refrigeration effectively slows down both microbial growth and fruit degradation, the present study highlights that increasing the storage temperature of fresh-cut fruit salads from 4 °C to 8 °C and extending storage time from 4 to 8 days is not advisable without further risk mitigation strategies [45]. The increase in L. monocytogenes growth at 8 °C, combined with the rapid proliferation of yeasts that degrade sensory quality, suggests that maintaining the recommended storage temperature of 4 °C is essential for ensuring both microbial safety and consumer acceptance. Any efforts to extend shelf-life must carefully consider the trade-offs between food safety, fruit quality, and consumer perceptions. There is an increased risk of exceeding the microbiological safety end product criteria of 100 CFU g−1 food item, in particular if using 8 °C as maximum storage temperatures or dynamic storage temperatures. Even for storage temperatures at 4 °C, there is a risk that the safety will be compromised. The content of L. monocytogenes at day 0 is crucial for the storage temperatures.
This study employed a controlled laboratory model using a single clinical strain, which, while useful for baseline risk evaluation, may not fully reflect the diversity of strains encountered in food systems. Future work should evaluate strain mixtures and other fresh-cut fruit cocktail compositions, simulate retail and consumer handling, and test the effect of protective atmospheres, pH modifiers, or natural antimicrobials in fresh-cut matrices. Additionally, exploring fruit cocktails without cantaloupe may help identify lower-risk alternatives for RTE applications. More holistic risk assessments should also consider the role of native microbiota, cross-contamination during preparation, and post-purchase handling variability.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods14203523/s1, Table S1: The analysis of variance (general linear model) on data recruited from the provocation experiment on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh-cut fruit cocktails consisting of red apples, red grapes, pineapple, and cantaloupe without additives; 175 g boxes with fresh-cut fruit cocktails were inoculated with either L. monocytogenes or 0.85 NaCl and kept for 8 days at either 4 °C or 8 °C or at 4 °C for the first day and 8 °C for the remaining time (“dynamic temperature regime”). The statistical analysis considers values obtained for Listeria monocytogenes, the heterotrophic microbiota, directly after inoculation and after 8 days storage. Yeasts and molds were only assessed after 8 days of storage. Table S2: Descriptive statistics, the two-sample T-test, confidence intervals, and probability levels on data recruited from the provocation experiment on growth of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh-cut fruit cocktails consisting of red apples, red grapes, pineapple, and cantaloupe without additives; 175 g boxes with fresh-cut fruit cocktails were inoculated with either L. monocytogenes or 0.85 NaCl and kept for 8 days at temperature regimes (TR) of either 4 °C or 8 °C or at 4 °C for the first day and 8 °C for the remaining time (“dynamic temperature regime”; 4 → 8). The statistical analysis considers values obtained for Listeria monocytogenes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.W.A. and S.W.; methodology, B.W.A.; validation, S.W., B.W.A. and E.M.; formal analysis, B.W.A., S.W. and E.M.; investigation B.W.A., S.W. and E.M.; resources, B.W.A.; data curation, B.W.A.; writing—original draft preparation, B.W.A.; writing—review and editing, B.W.A., S.W. and E.M.; visualization, B.W.A.; project administration, B.W.A.; funding acquisition, B.W.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council Formas, Stockholm, Sweden, “Hazards of invading food borne pathogens in vegetables and berries and prospects for preharvest prevention; grant number 2011-257”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available at https://doi.org/10.5878/3c62-ps41.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the staff at Vidinge Grönt for preparing the fresh-cut fruit cocktails prior to the onset of the experiment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Giannakourou, M.C.; Tsironi, T.N. Application of processing and packaging hurdles for fresh-cut fruits and vegetables preservation. Foods 2021, 10, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Soliva-Fortuny, R.C.; Martín-Belloso, O. New advances in extending the shelf-life of fresh-cut fruits: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2003, 14, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Siddiqui, M.W. Technologies and Mechanisms for Safety Control: Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables; Siddiqui, M.W., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Press: London, UK; San Diego, CA, USA; Cambridge, UK; Oxford, UK, 2020; p. 385. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mulaosmanovic, E.; Windstam, S.T.; Vågsholm, I.; Alsanius, B.W. Size matters: Biological and food safety relevance of leaf damage for colonization of Escherichia coli O157:H7gfp+. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 608086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wing, E.J.; Gregory, S.H. Listeria monocytogenes: Clinical and experimental update. J. Infect. Dis. 2002, 185, S18–S24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, L.; Pan, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, Z.; Jia, X.; Li, W.; Jia, H.; Li, X. Constant temperature during postharvest storage delays fruit ripening and enhances the antioxidant capacity of mature green tomato. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ferrante, A.; Maggiore, T. Chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements to evaluate storage time and temperature of Valeriana leafy vegetables. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2007, 45, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gil, M.I.; Aguayo, E.; Kader, A.A. Quality changes and nutrient retention in fresh-cut versus whole fruits during storage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 4284–4296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gross, K.C.; Wang, C.Y.; Saltveit, M. The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stock. In Vol. Agriculture Handbook 66; Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  10. Huang, J.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, B.; Zheng, J.; Nou, X. Growth and survival of Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes on fresh-cut produce and their juice extracts: Impacts and interactions of food matrices and temperature abuse conditions. Food Control 2019, 100, 300–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. McCollum, J.T.; Cronquist, A.B.; Silk, B.J.; Jackson, K.A.; O’Connor, K.A.; Cosgrove, S.; Gossack, J.P.; Parachini, S.S.; Jain, N.S.; Ettestad, P.; et al. Multistate outbreak of listeriosis associated with cantaloupe. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 944–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Carstens, C.K.; Salazar, J.K.; Darkoh, C. Multistate outbreaks of foodborne illness in the United States associated with fresh produce from 2010 to 2017. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Söderqvist, K.; Lambertz, L.T.; Vågsholm, I.; Fernström, L.L.; Alsanius, B.W.; Mogren, L.; Boqvist, S. Fate of Listeria monocytogenes, pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 gfp+ in ready-to-eat salad during cold storage: What is the risk to consumers? J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Beaufort, A.H.; Bergis, H.; Lardeux, A.-L.; Polet, M.; Botteldoorn, N.; Papageorgiou, G.; Andersen, J.K.; Boel, J.; Hickey, B.; Prencipe, V.; et al. EURL Lm Technical Guidance Document for Conducting Shelf-Life Studies on Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-To-Eat Foods; European Union Reference Laboratory for Listeria monocytogenes: Maisons-Alfort, France, 2014; p. 47. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mulaosmanovic, E.; Lindblom, T.; Windstam, S.; Bengtsson, M.; Rosberg, A.; Mogren, L.; Alsanius, B. Processing of leafy vegetables matter: Damage and microbial community structure from field to bag. Food Control 2021, 125, 107894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ali, L.; Alsanius, B.W.; Rosberg, A.K.; Svensson, B.; Nielsen, T.; Olsson, M. Effects of nutrition strategy on the levels of nutrients and bioactive compounds in blackberries. Eur. J. Food Res. Technol. 2012, 234, 33–44. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pepper, I.; Gerba, C.P.; Gentry, T.; Microbiology, E. Environmental Microbiology; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  18. Iturralde-García, R.D.; Cinco-Moroyoqui, R.X.; Martinez-Cruz, F.; Ruiz-Cruz, O.; Wong-Corral, S.; Borboa-Flores, F.J.; Cornejo-Ramirez, J.I.; Bernal-Mercado, Y.T.; Del-Toro-Sanchez, A.L. Emerging Technologies for Prolonging Fresh-Cut Fruits’ Quality and Safety during Storage. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bonaventura, D.; Piccolomini, R.; Paludi, D.; D’Orio, V.; Vergara, A.; Conter, M.; Ianieri, A. Influence of temperature on biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes on various food-contact surfaces: Relationship with motility and cell surface hydrophobicity. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 104, 1552–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ziegler, M.; Ru, S.; Stephan, R.; Guldimann, C. Growth potential of Listeria monocytogenes in six different RTE fruit products: Impact of food matrix, storage temperature and shelf life. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2018, 7, 7581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alegre, I.; Abadias, M.; Anguera, M.; Oliveira, M.; Vinas, I. Factors affecting growth of foodborne pathogens on minimally processed apples. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cai, S.; Worobo, R.W.; Snyder, A.B. Combined Effect of Storage Condition, Surface Integrity, and Length of Shelf Life on the Growth of Listeria monocytogenes and Spoilage Microbiota on Refrigerated Ready-to-Eat Products. J. Food Prot. 2019, 82, 1423–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nyarko, E.; Kniel, K.E.; Millner, P.D.; Luo, Y.; Handy, E.T.; Reynnells, R.; East, C.; Sharma, M. Survival and growth of Listeria monocytogenes on whole cantaloupes is dependent on site of contamination and storage temperature. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 234, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gu, G.; Kroft, B.; Lichtenwald, M.; Luo, Y.; Millner, P.; Patel, J.; Nou, X. Dynamics of Listeria monocytogenes and the microbiome on fresh-cut cantaloupe and romaine lettuce during storage at refrigerated and abusive temperatures. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2022, 364, 109531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hong, Y.K.; Yoon, W.B.; Huang, L.; Yuk, H.G. Predictive Modeling for Growth of Non- and Cold-adapted Listeria monocytogenes on Fresh-cut Cantaloupe at Different Storage Temperatures. J. Food Sci. 2014, 79, M1168–M1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, J.; Luo, Y.; Nou, X. Growth of Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes on Fresh-Cut Cantaloupe under Different Temperature Abuse Scenarios. J. Food Prot. 2015, 78, 1125–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kroft, B.; Gu, G.; Bolten, S.; Micallef, S.A.; Luo, Y.; Millner, P.; Nou, X. Effects of temperature abuse on the growth and survival of Listeria monocytogenes on a wide variety of whole and fresh-cut fruits and vegetables during storage. Food Control 2022, 137, 108919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ukuku, D.O.; Fett, W. Behavior of Listeria monocytogenes Inoculated on Cantaloupe Surfaces and Efficacy of Washing Treatments to Reduce Transfer from Rind to Fresh-Cut Pieces. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 924–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ukuku, D.O.; Olanya, M.; Geveke, D.J.; Sommers, C.H. Effect of Native Microflora, Waiting Period, and Storage Temperature on Listeria monocytogenes Serovars Transferred from Cantaloupe Rind to Fresh-Cut Pieces during Preparation. J. Food Prot. 2012, 75, 1912–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Moreira Calix, J.F. Effect of st ect of storage temper age temperature on the sur e on the survival or gr al or growth of Listeria owth of Listeria monocytogenes on whole and fresh-cut produce. In The School of Nutrition and Food Sciences; Louisiana State University: Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  31. Russo, S.; Cosciani-Cunico, E.; Dalzini, E.; Daminelli, P.; Ricchi, M.; Arrigoni, N.; Cammi, G. Evaluation of maximum growth rate of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat fresh-cut papaya and melon. Int. Food Res. J. 2023, 30, 953–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bolten, S.; Belias, A.; Weigand, K.A.; Pajor, M.; Qian, C.; Ivanek, R.; Wiedmann, M. Population dynamics of Listeria spp. Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli on fresh produce: A scoping review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 4537–4572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gorski, L.; Noriega, A.A.; Carter, M.Q. Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4b strains demonstrate a fitness advantage over strains of serotypes 1/2a and 4b-v1 on cantaloupe rind and flesh at different temperatures. Microbiol. Spectr. 2025, 13, e0125225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. FAO/WHO. Risk assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods. In Microbiological Risk Assessment Series; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization: Rome, Italy, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sant’Ana, A.S.; Barbosa, M.S.; Destro, M.T.; Landgraf, M.; Franco, B.D.G.M. Growth potential of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in nine types of ready-to-eat vegetables stored at variable temperature conditions during shelf-life. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 157, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Commission, E. Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union 2005, L338, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  37. Fang, T.; Liu, Y.; Huang, L. Growth kinetics of Listeria monocytogenes and spoilage microorganisms in fresh-cut cantaloupe. Food Microbiol. 2013, 34, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gahan, C.G.M.; Hill, C. Gastrointestinal phase of Listeria monocytogenes infection. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 98, 1345–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Amaro, A.L.; Spadafora, N.D.; Pereira, M.J.; Dhorajiwala, R.; Herbert, R.J.; Müller, C.T.; Rogers, H.J.; Pintado, M. Multitrait analysis of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon enables discrimination between storage times and temperatures and identifies potential markers for quality assessments. Food Chem. 2018, 241, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cefola, M.; Renna, M.; Pace, B. Marketability of ready-to-eat cactus pear as affected by temperature and modified atmosphere. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 51, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Manthou, E.; Coeuret, G.; Chaillou, S.; Nychas, G.J. Evolution of fungal community associated with ready-to-eat pineapple during storage under different temperature conditions. Food Microbiol. 2021, 97, 103736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, H.; Yamamoto, E.; Murphy, J.; Locas, A. Microbiological safety of ready-to-eat fresh-cut fruits and vegetables sold on the Canadian retail market. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 333, 108855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Althaus, D.; Hofer, E.; Corti, S.; Julmi, A.; Stephan, R. Bacteriological survey of ready-to-eat lettuce, fresh-cut fruit, and sprouts collected from the Swiss market. J. Food Prot. 2012, 75, 1338–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gil, M.I.; Truchado, P.; Tudela, J.A.; Allende, A. Environmental monitoring of three fresh-cut processing facilities reveals harborage sites for Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control 2023, 155, 110093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wilson, M.D.; Stanley, R.A.; Eyles, A.; Ross, T. Innovative processes and technologies for modified atmosphere packaging of fresh and fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 59, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Viable counts ((Log CFU + 1) g fruit−1) of heterotrophic bacteria, L. monocytogenes, and yeasts when stored for eight days at 4 °C (green), 8 °C (purple), and 4 °C during day 1 and 8 °C during the remaining time (orange), respectively. Samples were taken at the beginning and end of the eight-day-long cooling period. The estimation of yeasts was performed ad hoc during the experiment and is therefore only presented for day 8. Data points indicate average values and standard deviations from six independent replicates at each sampling event. Different letters associated with the data points within the same group of organisms indicate significant differences according to general linear model and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). For further statistical information, see Supplementary Tables S1 and S2.
Figure 1. Viable counts ((Log CFU + 1) g fruit−1) of heterotrophic bacteria, L. monocytogenes, and yeasts when stored for eight days at 4 °C (green), 8 °C (purple), and 4 °C during day 1 and 8 °C during the remaining time (orange), respectively. Samples were taken at the beginning and end of the eight-day-long cooling period. The estimation of yeasts was performed ad hoc during the experiment and is therefore only presented for day 8. Data points indicate average values and standard deviations from six independent replicates at each sampling event. Different letters associated with the data points within the same group of organisms indicate significant differences according to general linear model and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). For further statistical information, see Supplementary Tables S1 and S2.
Foods 14 03523 g001
Figure 2. Proliferation of Listeria monocytogenes (((Log CFU + 1) g fruit−1), standard deviations) in fresh-cut fruit cocktails during eight days of storage at 4 °C (green) and 8 °C (purple) and one day at 4 °C and seven days at 8 °C (orange) (n = 6). The fresh-cut fruit cocktail consisted of red apples, red grapes, cantaloupe, and pineapple. Different letters above the bars within the sampling event indicate significant differences based on one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Proliferation of Listeria monocytogenes (((Log CFU + 1) g fruit−1), standard deviations) in fresh-cut fruit cocktails during eight days of storage at 4 °C (green) and 8 °C (purple) and one day at 4 °C and seven days at 8 °C (orange) (n = 6). The fresh-cut fruit cocktail consisted of red apples, red grapes, cantaloupe, and pineapple. Different letters above the bars within the sampling event indicate significant differences based on one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Foods 14 03523 g002
Table 1. Sampling schedule for Listeria monocytogenes, the heterotrophic microbiota, yeasts, and abiotic parameters (pH, water activity (aw), total soluble solids, and titrable acidity).
Table 1. Sampling schedule for Listeria monocytogenes, the heterotrophic microbiota, yeasts, and abiotic parameters (pH, water activity (aw), total soluble solids, and titrable acidity).
ParameterDay
0345678
Listeria monocytogenes
Heterotrophic microbiota     
Yeasts      
pH     
Total soluble solids     
Titrable acidity     
Water activity
Table 2. Incubation conditions (temperature, °C; length, h) for heterotrophic bacteria using Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA), Listeria monocytogenes (Harlequin Agar), and yeasts (yeast malt agar).
Table 2. Incubation conditions (temperature, °C; length, h) for heterotrophic bacteria using Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA), Listeria monocytogenes (Harlequin Agar), and yeasts (yeast malt agar).
Microbiological MediumIncubation
TemperatureLength
Tryptic Soy Agar2548
Harlequin Agar3724
Yeast malt Agar2572
Table 3. Growth parameters of L. monocytogenes and heterotrophic bacteria in fresh-cut fruit cocktail during storage for 8 days at 4 °C, 8 °C, and with dynamic temperature control (day 1: 4 °C; remaining seven days: 8 °C). The number of generations (n), generation time (g; h/generation), specific growth rate (k; number of generations/h), and division rate (v, reciprocal to generation time g) were calculated based on viable count data shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Table 3. Growth parameters of L. monocytogenes and heterotrophic bacteria in fresh-cut fruit cocktail during storage for 8 days at 4 °C, 8 °C, and with dynamic temperature control (day 1: 4 °C; remaining seven days: 8 °C). The number of generations (n), generation time (g; h/generation), specific growth rate (k; number of generations/h), and division rate (v, reciprocal to generation time g) were calculated based on viable count data shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Temperature
Regime
ngkv
L. monocytogenes
4 °C1.9610.200.030.10
4 °C → 8 °C4.554.390.070.23
8 °C3.695.420.060.18
Heterotrophic bacteria in non-inoculated fresh-cut fruit cocktails
4 °C9.52.110.140.48
4 °C → 8 °C14.281.400.220.71
8 °C13.151.520.200.66
Heterotrophic bacteria in L. monocytogenes-inoculated fresh-cut fruit cocktails
4 °C8.212.440.120.41
4 °C → 8 °C12.791.560.190.64
8 °C13.221.510.200.66
Table 4. Abiotic factors (pH; water activity, aw; total acidity, %; total soluble solids, %) in fresh-cut fruit cocktails at the start (day 0) and end (day 8) of the study. Fresh-cut fruit cocktails were stored continuously at 4 °C and 8 °C for eight days, respectively, or in dynamic temperature control with 4 °C on day 1 and 8 °C for the remaining seven days. (n = 6).
Table 4. Abiotic factors (pH; water activity, aw; total acidity, %; total soluble solids, %) in fresh-cut fruit cocktails at the start (day 0) and end (day 8) of the study. Fresh-cut fruit cocktails were stored continuously at 4 °C and 8 °C for eight days, respectively, or in dynamic temperature control with 4 °C on day 1 and 8 °C for the remaining seven days. (n = 6).
Parameter4 °C4 °C → 8 °C8 °C
 Day 0Day 8Day 0Day 8Day 0Day 8
pH3.85 ± 0.19 A 13.91 ± 0.22 A3.89 ± 0.06 A3.95 ± 0.09 A3.96 ±0.08 A3.92 ± 0.10 A
aw0.982 ± 0.003 A0.985 ± 0.004 A0.980 ± 0.002 A0.980 ± 0.003 A0.980 ± 0.002 A0.980 ± 0.003 A
Titrable acidity0.56 ± 0.06 A0.54 ± 0.08 A0.55 ± 0.02 B0.63 ± 0.05 A0.60 ± 0.04 A0.62 ± 0.06 A
Total soluble solids14.14 ± 0.64 A13.70 ± 0.72 A14.09 ± 0.27 A13.26 ± 0.54 B14.46 ± 0.55 A13.70 ± 0.55 B
1 Values within the same row and storage temperature accompanied by different letters differ significantly according to one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alsanius, B.W.; Windstam, S.; Mulaosmanovic, E. Chill or Thrill? The Effect of Storage Temperature Regime on Listeria Growth in Fresh-Cut Fruit Cocktails. Foods 2025, 14, 3523. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14203523

AMA Style

Alsanius BW, Windstam S, Mulaosmanovic E. Chill or Thrill? The Effect of Storage Temperature Regime on Listeria Growth in Fresh-Cut Fruit Cocktails. Foods. 2025; 14(20):3523. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14203523

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alsanius, Beatrix W., Sofia Windstam, and Emina Mulaosmanovic. 2025. "Chill or Thrill? The Effect of Storage Temperature Regime on Listeria Growth in Fresh-Cut Fruit Cocktails" Foods 14, no. 20: 3523. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14203523

APA Style

Alsanius, B. W., Windstam, S., & Mulaosmanovic, E. (2025). Chill or Thrill? The Effect of Storage Temperature Regime on Listeria Growth in Fresh-Cut Fruit Cocktails. Foods, 14(20), 3523. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14203523

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop