The Perception of Organic Food Characteristics and the Demographic and Social Profile of Consumers: A Study of the Polish Market
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- To develop a model of the relationship between the general characteristics of commercial organic foods and the demographic and socio-economic characteristics of consumers.
- To identify regression relationships between the general characteristics of commercial organic food and the demographic and socio-economic profile of consumers.
- To analyse the covariance between the demographic (gender and education) and socio-economic (income and food expenditure) characteristics of consumers.
- To develop a model of the relationship between the characteristics of plant and animal products in organic food and the demographic and socio-economic characteristics of consumers.
- To identify regression relationships between plant and animal product characteristics and the demographic and socio-economic profile of consumers.
2. Review of the Literature
2.1. Characteristics of Organic Food Products
2.2. Determinants of Consumers’ Perception of Organic Food Characteristics
3. Hypothesis Development
3.1. Demographic Characteristics of Respondents
3.2. Economic Characteristics of Respondents
3.3. Characteristics of Organic Food and Demographic/Economic Profile of Consumers
4. Methods
5. Results
6. Discussion
- ✓
- Messages emphasizing the sensory qualities of products (e.g., taste and freshness) should be directed mainly to women.
- ✓
- Men and consumers with higher incomes may be interested in ecological and functional aspects, such as a lack of chemicals and animal welfare standards.
7. Conclusions
- Household income and gender are key determinants of purchasing preferences among Polish consumers. Women focus on the sensory qualities of products, while men and people with higher incomes are more likely to appreciate ecological aspects.
- Sensory attributes (taste and freshness) and ecological attributes (a lack of preservatives and animal welfare) play a key role in shaping the preferences of Polish consumers. Plant products are valued for their freshness and lack of pesticides, while animal products are valued for their lack of hormones and antibiotics.
- Education does not significantly differentiate the perception of organic food attributes by Polish consumers, which suggests that the availability of information may be a sufficient educational factor.
- There is a justified need to diversify the sales and promotion strategies for organic products depending on the demographic and socio-economic profile of the consumer. Women may be more susceptible to messages emphasizing the health and sensory advantages of products, while consumers with higher incomes may seek premium products with exceptional quality.
- The accessibility of organic products for low-income Polish consumers is particularly important. Activities should include both educational campaigns and initiatives that promote the greater affordability of organic products.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zanoli, R.; Naspetti, S. Consumer Motivations in the Purchase of Organic Food. Br. Food J. 2002, 104, 37–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzybowska-Brzezińska, M.; Grzywińska-Rąpca, M.; Żuchowski, I.; Bórawski, P. Organic Food Attributes Determing Consumer Choices. Eur. Res. Stud. J. 2017, XX, 164–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzybowska-Brzezińska, M. Preferencje Konsumentów w Kształtowaniu Atrybutów Produktu Żywnościowego; Wyd. Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego w Olsztynie: Olsztyn, Poland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Verain, M.C.; Dagevos, H.; Antonides, G. Sustainable food consumption. Product choice or curtailment? Appetite 2016, 104, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grunert, K.G.; Hieke, S.; Wills, J. Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy 2014, 44, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diagourtas, G.; Kounetas, K.E.; Simaki, V. Consumer attitudes and sociodemographic profiles in purchasing organic food products: Evidence from a Greek and Swedish survey. Br. Food J. 2023, 125, 2407–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varaldo, A.; Borra, D.; Vassallo, E.; Massimelli, F.; Massaglia, S.; Merlino, V.M. A study on perceptions towards organic and local production, and individuals’ socio-demographic and geographical affiliation influencing fruit and vegetable purchasing preferences of EU households. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalyani, R.; Prabhavathi, Y. Understanding Consumer Behavior in the Organic Food Market: Perceptions, Preferences and Purchase Factors. Asian J. Agric. Ext. Econ. Soc. 2023, 41, 992–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Farm to Fork Strategy: For a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-Friendly Food System; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2020.
- European Commission. Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Organic Production and Labelling of Organic Products; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
- Muradin, M.; Banach, J.K.; Turowski, J.; Wojnarowska, M. The Limitations of Implementing Environmental Labelling: The Example of Eco-Scoring. Crac. Rev. Econ. Manag. 2023, 3, 85–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellman, S.; Johnson, E.J.; Kobrin, S.J.; Lohse, G.L. International differences in information privacy concerns: A global survey of consumers. Inf. Soc. 2004, 20, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Austgulen, M.H. Understanding national preferences in EU consumer policy: A regime approach. J. Consum. Policy 2020, 43, 767–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zander, K.; Hamm, U. Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food. Food Qual. Prefer. 2010, 21, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janssen, M. Determinants of organic food purchases: Evidence from household panel data. Food Qual. Prefer. 2018, 68, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pomarici, E.; Vecchio, R. Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: An exploratory study on Italian consumers. J. Clean Prod. 2014, 61, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzybowska-Brzezińska, M.; Grzywińska-Rąpca, M. Rynek żywności ekologicznej w aspekcie rozwoju zjawiska świadomej konsumpcji. Handel Wewnętrzny 2018, 2, 168–177. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Dudziak, A.; Kocira, A. Preference-Based Determinants of Consumer Choice on the Polish Organic Food Market. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bryła, P. Organic food consumption in Poland: Motivations and barriers. Appetite 2016, 105, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yilmaz, B. Factors Influencing Consumers’ Behaviour towards Purchasing Organic Foods: A Theoretical Model. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boachie-Mensah, F.; Boohene, R. A review of cross-cultural variations in consumer behaviour and marketing strategy. Int. Bus. Manag. 2012, 5, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghali-Zinoubi, Z. On linking socioeconomic status to consumer willingness to buy and pay for organic food. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 1042–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakubowska, D.; Dąbrowska, A.Z.; Pachołek, B.; Sady, S. Behavioral Intention to Purchase Sustainable Food: Generation Z’s Perspective. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakubowska, D.; Sadílek, T. Sustainably produced butter: The effect of product knowledge, interest in sustainability, and consumer characteristics on purchase frequency. Agric. Econ.-Czech. 2023, 69, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakubowska, D.; Dąbrowska, A.Z.; Pachołek, B.; Sady, S. Purchasing behaviours of Generation Z in the traditional food market—The impact of selected sociodemographic characteristics. J. Mark. Mark. Stud. 2023, 8, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filimonau, V.; Matute, J.; Durydiwka, M.; Faracik, R.; Mika, M.; Zajadacz, A. The determinants of more responsible restaurant food choice in Poland. J. Sustain. Tour. 2018, 26, 1398–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goryńska-Goldmann, E.; Murawska, A.; Balcerowska-Czerniak, G. Consumer Profiles of Sustainable Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in the European Union. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wojciechowska-Solis, J.; Śmiglak-Krajewska, M. Being a Product Consumer during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Profile of the Polish Consumer in the Organic Dairy Market. Br. Food J. 2022, 125, 2350–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzybowska-Brzezińska, M.; Kuberska, D.; Ankiel, M.; Brelik, A. Consumer’s Behavior in a Multi-Attribute Concept of a Food Product. Eur. Res. Stud. J. 2020, 23, 526–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, M.; Wang, J. The impact of pro-environmental awareness components on green consumption behavior: The moderation effect of consumer perceived cost, policy incentives, and face culture. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 580823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simiyu, G.; Kariuki, V.W. Self-image and Green Buying Intentions Among University Students: The Role of Environmental Concern and Social Influence. J. Nonprofit Public Sect. Mark. 2024, 36, 364–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pant, S.C.; Saxena, R.; Gupta, N.K.; Yadav, H.; Ad, S.K.; Pant, D.K. The Organic Odyssey: Navigating the Influence of Attitude on Purchase Intent, Mediated by Perceived Value, Quality, and Price in India. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 79, 103801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arcese, G.; Elmo, G.C.; Fortuna, F.; Pasca, M.G.; Risso, M. The Role of Traditional Aspects, Health Consciousness and Environmental Concerns in Italian Agri-food Consumption During COVID-19. Br. Food J. 2024, 126, 237–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Salirrosas, E.E.; Escobar-Farfán, M.; Gómez- Bayona, L.; Moreno-López, G.; Valencia-Arias, A.; Gallardo-Canales, R. Influence of Environmental Awareness on the Willingness to Pay for Green Products: An Analysis Under the Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior in the Peruvian Market. Front. Psychol. 2024, 14, 1282383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hasan, M.M.; Al Amin, M.; Arefin, M.S.; Mostafa, T. Green Consumers’ Behavioral Intention and Loyalty to Use Mobile Organic Food Delivery Applications: The Role of Social Supports, Sustainability Perceptions, and Religious Consciousness. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024, 26, 15953–16003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Azlie, W.E.; Zahari, M.S.M.; Majid, H.N.A.; Hanafiah, M.H. To What Extent Does Consumers’ Perceived Health Consciousness Regarding Organic Food Influence Their Dining Choices at Organic Restaurants? An Empirical Investigation. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2023, 34, 100843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, C.; Zhang, X. What Triggers Consumers to Purchase Eco-Friendly Food? The Impact of Micro Signals, Macro Signals and Perceived Value. Br. Food J. 2024, 126, 2204–2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deliana, Y.; Rum, I.A. How does perception on green environment across generations affect consumer behaviour? A neural network process. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2019, 43, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurmeet, K.M.; von der Heidt, T.; Sorwar, G.; Sivapalan, A. The moderating role of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions on consumer purchasing of organic food. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2023, 36, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eldesouky, A.; Mesias, F.J.; Escribano, M. Perception of Spanish consumers towards environmentally friendly labelling in food. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2020, 44, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzywińska-Rapca, M. Economic Welfare and Subjective Assessments of Financial Situation of European Households. Eur. Res. Stud. J. 2021, XXIV, 948–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çelik, H.; Gül, A. Consumer Perceptions and Purchase Intentions towards Organic Foods: Evidence from Eastern Mediterranean Region of Türkiye. Asian J. Agric. Ext. Econ. Sociol. 2023, 41, 275–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Čolović, M.; Mitić, V. Relationship Between Types of Organic Food and Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Buyers in Serbia. Contemp. Agric. 2023, 73, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno-Miranda, C.; Franco-Crespo, C.; Pachucho, I.; Uño, K.; Gordillo, A.; Ortiz, J. Socioeconomic characteristics, purchasing preferences and willingness to consume organic food: A cross-location comparison of nine cities in Central Ecuador. Foods 2022, 11, 3979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Istiasih, H. Organic Food Consumption Behaviour: Sustainability, Symbol of Social Class, Luxury and Price. Int. J. Humanit. Educ. Soc. Sci. 2023, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Čolović, M.; Mitić, V. Situation factors in purchasing organic food. Acta Agric. Serbica 2024, 29, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naydenova, K.; Kamegawa, A.; Peet, M.J.; Henderson, R.; Fujiyoshi, Y.; Russo, C.J. On the reduction in the effects of radiation damage to two-dimensional crystals of organic and biological molecules at liquid-helium temperature. Ultramicroscopy 2022, 237, 113512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khanchanapong, T.; Taweesuk, P.; Tachibana, E.; Randall, B. The Relationship between Consumer Characteristics and Social Media Marketing Content Regarding Organic Vegetable Products: Evidence from Facebook Users in Bangkok, Thailand. Parichart J. 2022, 35, 217–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siva, E.; Chandrachud, S. Organic farm products and socio demography: A study special reference with Tiruvannamalai District. Int. J. Health Sci. 2022, 6, 4922–4930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzywińska-Rąpca, M. Consumer Purchasing Behaviour during the COVID-19 Epidemic: A Case Study for Poland. Ekon. Reg. [Econ. Reg.] 2022, 18, 595–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andruszkiewicz, K.; Grzybowska-Brzezińska, M.; Grzywińska-Rąpca, M.; Wiśniewski, P.D. Attitudes and Pro-Environmental Behavior of Representatives of Generation Z from the Example of Poland and Germany. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrescu, D.C.; Vermeir, I.; Petrescu-Mag, R.M. Consumer understanding of food quality, healthiness, and environmental impact: A cross-national perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.; Pham, T.L.; Dang, V.T. Environmental consciousness and organic food purchase intention: A moderated mediation model of perceived food quality and price sensitivity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hansmann, R.; Baur, I.; Binder, C.R. Increasing organic food consumption: An integrating model of drivers and barriers. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 275, 123058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karelakis, C.; Zevgitis, P.; Galanopoulos, K.; Mattas, K. Consumer trends and attitudes to functional foods. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2020, 32, 266–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gundala, R.R.; Singh, A. What motivates consumers to buy organic foods? Results of an empirical study in the United States. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hemmerling, S.; Hamm, U.; Spiller, A. Consumption behaviour regarding organic food from a marketing perspective—A literature review. Org. Agric. 2015, 5, 277–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Marchi, E.; Caputo, V.; Nayga, R.M.; Banterle, A. Time preferences and food choices: Evidence from a choice experiment. Food Policy 2016, 62, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, C.; Siegrist, M. Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 61, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grunert, K.G.; Bredahl, L.; Brunso, K. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector—A review. Meat Sci. 2004, 66, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | Relation | Variables | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General characteristics | <--> | Gender of respondent | 0.149 | 0.029 | 5.120 | *** |
General characteristics | <--> | Education of respondent | 0.002 | 0.001 | 1.450 | 0.147 |
General characteristics | <--> | Respondent’s expenditure on food | −0.060 | 0.021 | −2.884 | 0.004 |
General characteristics | <--> | Respondent’s expenditure on organic food | 0.000 | 0.000 | 7.463 | *** |
General characteristics | <--> | Household income | −0.001 | 0.000 | −10.735 | *** |
Preservative-free preparations | <--> | General characteristics | 1.000 | |||
Hardly processed foods | <--> | General characteristics | 1.053 | 0.049 | 21.633 | *** |
Food produced in a clean environment | <--> | General characteristics | 1.132 | 0.053 | 21.373 | *** |
Food with a good natural flavour | <--> | General characteristics | 1.297 | 0.050 | 25.851 | *** |
Food with an attractive appearance | <--> | General characteristics | 1.189 | 0.052 | 22.711 | *** |
Food with higher protein content | <--> | General characteristics | 1.166 | 0.064 | 18.119 | *** |
Food with a short shelf life Storage | <--> | General characteristics | 0.988 | 0.055 | 17.895 | *** |
Products whose manufacture pollute the environment | <--> | General characteristics | 1.018 | 0.075 | 13.609 | *** |
Variables | Relation | Variables | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Education of respondent | <--> | Gender of respondent | 1.596 | 0.417 | 3.823 | *** |
Education of respondent | <--> | Respondent’s expenditure on food | −4.450 | 0.690 | −6.452 | *** |
Respondent’s expenditure on food | <--> | Respondent’s expenditure on organic food | 195.775 | 31.049 | 6.305 | *** |
Gender of respondent | <--> | Respondent’s expenditure on food | −0.016 | 0.033 | −0.482 | 0.629 |
Gender of respondent | <--> | Respondent’s expenditure on organic food | −2.813 | 18.676 | −0.151 | 0.880 |
Gender of respondent | <--> | Household income | −24.249 | 9.405 | −2.578 | 0.010 |
Education of respondent | <--> | Respondent’s expenditure on organic food | −1074.031 | 379.314 | −2.832 | 0.005 |
Education of respondent | <--> | Household income | −38.893 | 189.651 | -0.205 | 0.838 |
Respondent’s expenditure on food | <--> | Household income | −125.958 | 15.779 | −7.983 | *** |
Respondent’s expenditure on organic food | <--> | Household income | 164,429.659 | 9978.229 | 16.479 | *** |
Variables | Relation | Variables | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plant products | <--> | Gender of respondent | 0.141 | 0.035 | 3.969 | *** |
Animal products | <--> | Gender of respondent | 0.131 | 0.036 | 3.626 | *** |
Plant products | <--> | Education of respondent | −0.002 | 0.002 | −1.115 | 0.265 |
Animal products | <--> | Education of respondent | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1.057 | 0.291 |
Plant products | <--> | Respondent’s expenditure on food | −0.056 | 0.025 | −2.190 | 0.029 |
Plant products | <--> | Respondent’s expenditure on organic food | 0.000 | 0.000 | 7.254 | *** |
Plant products | <--> | Household income | −0.001 | 0.000 | −11.440 | *** |
Animal products | <--> | Household income | −0.001 | 0.000 | −8.642 | *** |
Animal products | <--> | Respondent’s expenditure on organic food | 0.000 | 0.000 | 8.172 | *** |
Animal products | <--> | Respondent’s expenditure on food | −0.201 | 0.027 | −7.340 | *** |
Plant products produced without artificial fertilisers | <--> | Plant products | 1.000 | |||
Plant products produced (excluding plant protection products) | <--> | Plant products | 1.095 | 0.048 | 22.667 | *** |
Plant product that contain more vitamins and minerals | <--> | Plant products | 1.172 | 0.051 | 22.983 | *** |
Plant products with freshness (firmness and juiciness) | <--> | Plant products | 1.155 | 0.048 | 23.967 | *** |
Food of animal origin with less fat | <--> | Animal products | 1.000 | |||
Meat preparations with a short shelf life | <--> | Animal products | 1.095 | 0.074 | 14.774 | *** |
Food of animal origin (no added hormones and antibiotics) | <--> | Animal products | 1.329 | 0.089 | 14.855 | *** |
Hypothesis | Conclusion of This Study |
---|---|
H1: There is a significant relationship between the general characteristics of organic food and the demographic characteristics of the respondents (gender and education). | General characteristics of organic food, such as taste, freshness, and a lack of preservatives, were strongly associated with the gender of the consumer. |
H2: There is a significant relationship between the general characteristics of organic food and the economic characteristics of the respondents (income, food expenditure, and organic food expenditure). | The general characteristics of organic food, such as taste, freshness, and a lack of preservatives, were strongly related to consumers’ economic characteristics (income and expenditure on organic food). |
H3: There is a significant relationship between the characteristics of plant products in organic food and the demographic/social profile of consumers. | There were significant covariate relationships between consumers’ demographic characteristics (gender and education) and consumers’ economic characteristics (income and food expenditure). |
H4: There is a significant relationship between the characteristics of animal products in organic food and the demographic/social profile of consumers. | The absence of hormones and antibiotics, as well as animal welfare, were key features for higher-income organic food consumers. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Grzywińska-Rąpca, M.; Grzybowska-Brzezińska, M.; Jakubowska, D.; Banach, J.K. The Perception of Organic Food Characteristics and the Demographic and Social Profile of Consumers: A Study of the Polish Market. Foods 2025, 14, 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14020308
Grzywińska-Rąpca M, Grzybowska-Brzezińska M, Jakubowska D, Banach JK. The Perception of Organic Food Characteristics and the Demographic and Social Profile of Consumers: A Study of the Polish Market. Foods. 2025; 14(2):308. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14020308
Chicago/Turabian StyleGrzywińska-Rąpca, Małgorzata, Mariola Grzybowska-Brzezińska, Dominika Jakubowska, and Joanna Katarzyna Banach. 2025. "The Perception of Organic Food Characteristics and the Demographic and Social Profile of Consumers: A Study of the Polish Market" Foods 14, no. 2: 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14020308
APA StyleGrzywińska-Rąpca, M., Grzybowska-Brzezińska, M., Jakubowska, D., & Banach, J. K. (2025). The Perception of Organic Food Characteristics and the Demographic and Social Profile of Consumers: A Study of the Polish Market. Foods, 14(2), 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14020308