Next Article in Journal
Urea-Reassembled Soy Lipophilic Protein Nanoparticles for Resveratrol Delivery: Structure, Interfaces, and Digestion
Previous Article in Journal
Biological Characteristics and Chemical Composition of Crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) Reared in Two Different Culture Modes in Cold Regions of China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances in Atmospheric Cold Plasma Technology for Plant-Based Food Safety, Functionality, and Quality Implications

1
School of Pharmacy, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
3
Key Laboratory of Geriatric Nutrition and Health, Beijing Technology and Business University, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100048, China
4
Key Laboratory of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences of Ministry of Agriculture and Zhejiang Province, Institute of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(17), 2999; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14172999
Submission received: 18 July 2025 / Revised: 17 August 2025 / Accepted: 25 August 2025 / Published: 27 August 2025

Abstract

Growing global concerns over pesticide residues and microbial contamination in plant-derived foods have intensified the demand for sustainable decontamination solutions. Conventional physical, chemical, and biological methods are hampered by inherent limitations, including operational inefficiency, secondary pollution risks, and nutritional degradation. Atmospheric cold plasma (ACP) has emerged as a promising non-thermal technology to address these challenges at near-ambient temperatures, leveraging the generation of highly reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (RONS), ultraviolet radiation, and ozone. This review comprehensively examines fundamental ACP mechanisms, discharge configurations, and their applications within plant-based food safety systems. It critically evaluates recent advancements in inactivating microorganisms, degrading mycotoxins and pesticides, and modulating enzymatic activity, while also exploring emerging applications in bioactive compound extraction, drying enhancement, and seed germination promotion. Crucially, the impact of ACP on the quality attributes of plant-based foods is summarized. Treatment parameters can alter physicochemical properties covering color, texture, flavor, acidity, and water activity as well as nutritional constituents such as antioxidants, proteins, lipids, and carbohydrate content. As an environmentally friendly, low-energy-consumption technology with high reactivity, ACP offers transformative potential for enhancing food safety, preserving quality, and fostering sustainable agricultural systems.

1. Introduction

Global population growth, accelerated globalization, increased industrial chains, and diversified technological approaches have heightened concerns on the safety of plant-based food. In recent years, frequent incidents involving pesticide misuse, microbial contamination, and excessive heavy metals in plant-derived foods pose significant threats to human health. Pesticide and microbial contamination are particularly concerning due to their potential carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, and mutagenicity [1,2]. Consequently, regulatory oversight in the fields of food safety protection has been progressively intensified within the agricultural and food sectors [3,4,5,6,7]. Current degradation approaches comprise physical (e.g., irradiation, photocatalysis, ultrasound, and microwave [8,9,10]), chemical (e.g., persulfate, Fenton reaction, and ozonation [11,12,13]), and biological methods (e.g., microbial and enzymatic degradation [14,15,16]). However, traditional physical methods tend to be inefficient, while chemical and biological methods may lead to secondary pollution and potential losses in the quality and nutritional value of food or medicinal materials [17]. It is important to note that these conventional methods remain indispensable for many large-scale industrial processes where their efficacy and cost-effectiveness are well established. The search for alternative or complementary technologies is driven by the need to address the specific limitations of these methods, particularly for heat-sensitive, high-value, and minimally processed products where quality preservation is paramount. In contrast, non-thermal technologies such as ultra-high pressure, ultraviolet radiation, pulsed electric fields, and low-temperature plasma represent emerging research frontiers for degrading food contaminants [18,19,20,21,22,23].
Atmospheric cold plasma (ACP), a novel green non-thermal processing technology, demonstrates significant potential in plant-based food processing through the generation of reactive oxygen/nitrogen species, ultraviolet radiation, and ozone. This enables sterilization, pesticide degradation, and enzyme inactivation in plant-derived foods while minimizing thermal damage to nutritional and sensory properties [24]. ACP technology features low energy consumption, ease of operation, high reactivity, thermodynamic non-equilibrium and high efficiency. It selectively targets surface microorganisms or enzymes without sample penetration, thereby maximally preserving nutritional content and natural flavor while leaving no toxic residues. Its operational efficiency supports applications in agriculture and food processing, including sterilization, seed treatment, pesticide degradation, food preservation, surface modification, active compound extraction, and food drying [24].
This review delivers a comprehensive analysis of recent advances in ACP technology for plant-based foods. While several reviews on this topic exist, this work distinguishes itself by three key contributions: first, by systematically delineating ACP generation systems for food-specific applications; second, by moving beyond a descriptive summary to critically analyze and interpret the conflicting findings in the literature regarding ACP’s impact on food quality; and third, by identifying the causal relationships between processing parameters, food matrix properties, and observed outcomes. By synthesizing these perspectives, we aim to provide a forward-looking perspective on the future directions of ACP applications.

2. Types of Atmospheric Cold Plasma

Plasma is the fourth state of matter. It was identified during the 17th century and formally termed by Irving Langmuir in 1928 [25,26]. This ionized neutral gas comprises excited electrons, ions, radicals, and neutral particles [27]. While all gases above zero Kelvin contain charged particles, plasma requires collective particle interactions. Generated via energy inputs, including electrical, UV, and gamma radiation, plasma emits 100–380 nm UV radiation alongside highly reactive species [28]. Classification depends on gas temperature and thermodynamic equilibrium: high-temperature plasma contrasts with low-temperature variants—thermal plasma and cold plasma. ACP specifically denotes atmospheric-pressure cold plasma where ions or neutrals exhibit lower temperatures than electrons, creating a non-uniform energy distribution [28,29]. ACP types include dielectric barrier discharge (DBD), atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ), corona discharge (CD), radio frequency (RF), gliding arc (GAD), and microwave discharge (MW), with source structure and reactive species density determining the application efficacy [30]. Various plasma source devices are illustrated in Figure 1, and the comparative analysis of major ACP generation systems is summarized in Table S1.
Figure 1. Examples of various plasma source devices [31,32,33] (reprinted with permission from ref. [32], copyright © 2025 Springer Nature): (a) DBD, (b1) double-ring electrode DBD jet, (b2) coaxial electrode APPJ, (c) CD, (d1) inductively coupled plasma (ICP), and (d2) capacitively coupled plasmas (CCP), (e) MWD source, and (f) GAD.
Figure 1. Examples of various plasma source devices [31,32,33] (reprinted with permission from ref. [32], copyright © 2025 Springer Nature): (a) DBD, (b1) double-ring electrode DBD jet, (b2) coaxial electrode APPJ, (c) CD, (d1) inductively coupled plasma (ICP), and (d2) capacitively coupled plasmas (CCP), (e) MWD source, and (f) GAD.
Foods 14 02999 g001

2.1. Dielectric Barrier Discharge

Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD), a prevalent ACP generation method, employs two metal electrodes, one connected to a high voltage source and the other grounded. At least one of the electrodes is covered with a dielectric layer (such as ceramic, glass, quartz, or polymer), or a dielectric barrier is suspended between the electrodes. This configuration prevents arc or spark discharges while maintaining a millimeter-scale gas gap filled with air, nitrogen, argon, or mixtures [34]. Operated at atmospheric pressure with alternating current or pulsed voltages typically at kilohertz to megahertz frequencies (1–500 kHz), and in special cases from 50 Hz to 10 MHz [35], DBD initiates when electrons in the gas gap are accelerated by the applied electric field. Their collisions with neutral molecules trigger localized ionization, forming spatially discrete filamentary discharges, or under optimized conditions uniform glow discharges. The accumulation of surface charges on dielectrics generates a self-pulsing mechanism that quenches individual micro-discharges and prevents arc transition [36]. Processing efficacy depends on parameters (e.g., pressure, gas, type, flow rate, power, and duration), reactor geometry, substrate properties, and exposure conditions. Common DBD configurations include surface discharge (symmetrical electrodes for planar treatment), volume discharge (coaxial annular gap for pollutant degradation), and specialized variants like floating-electrode, flexible-film, or radiofrequency-driven systems [35,36]. Key advantages encompass uniform discharge, low energy consumption, compact design, operational safety, and cost-effectiveness [34].

2.2. Corona Discharge

Corona discharge (CD) generates non-thermal plasma through localized electron avalanches occurring within a strongly non-uniform electric field maintained at voltages below the breakdown threshold [34,37]. It occurs between geometrically asymmetric electrodes, typically involving a sharp conductor (e.g., needle or wire) and a significantly larger counter-electrode (plate/cylinder), utilizing DC, AC, or pulsed power sources [38]. Positive CD initiates at the anode tip via photoionization-driven streamers, while negative CD originates at the cathode tip through electron-impact ionization. In both cases, the discharge development is critically constrained by the accumulation of space charge [39]. Discharge morphology evolves with applied voltage and electrode geometry: needle–plate configurations exhibit distinct regimes including pulsed-to-glow transitions (positive) or Trichel pulse-to-spark stages (negative), whereas wire-based systems typically form filamentary and often beaded jets (negative) or uniform sheathed streamers (positive) [38]. CD finds applications in areas such as electrostatic precipitation, ozone generation, and surface sterilization. However, its widespread adoption is often limited by challenges including poor spatial uniformity, risk of localized thermal damage, and relatively small effective treatment areas. These limitations are frequently addressed via multi-point electrode arrays or hybrid plasma systems [31,38,40].

2.3. Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet

The atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) generates non-equilibrium plasma beyond its discharge gap, comprising coaxial or ring-shaped electrodes within inert or mixed gases [31]. Applying high-frequency, low-frequency, or nanosecond pulses at 100–250 V ionizes the gas, ejecting ionized molecules as a plume through a nozzle into an unconfined working zone [32]. Gas flow rate and applied voltage critically govern plasma generation in this centimeter-scale AC-powered device [31,41]. APPJs exhibit streamer and glow discharge characteristics [41], with discharge-working zone separation ensuring stability [42] and gas flow promoting uniformity [43]. While inert gases facilitate discharge initiation, gas mixtures are also viable [43]. APPJs eliminate vacuum systems, enabling remote treatment of complex surfaces [41,43] for applications including sterilization, biomedicine, and material processing.

2.4. Gliding Arc Discharge

Gliding arc discharge (GAD) generates non-thermal plasma by initiating high-voltage arcs at the narrowest electrode gap, which are elongated by gas-dynamic shear forces and glide along electrodes under gas flow or mechanical motion [44]. This cyclic process involves local breakdown, arc elongation driven by flow velocity gradients, and re-ignition after arc extinction at maximum length due to resistance-induced power imbalance [45]. GAD systems utilize conductive metal electrodes to control gas flow profiles, powered by DC/AC high-voltage sources [44]. Rotary designs overcome planar GAD’s gas interaction limitations by confining rotating arcs in vortex-stabilized zones [45]. Compared to other plasmas, GAD achieves high ionization rates, gas temperatures in the arc core to 300–1000 K in downstream regions, and improved energy efficiencies in optimized rotary configurations [45]. Its low energy consumption, rapid quenching that preserves non-equilibrium states, and chemical selectivity [44] support applications in fuel conversion, material synthesis, and pollution control [46].

2.5. Glow Discharge

Glow discharge (GD), a self-sustained low-pressure (1–1000 Pa) plasma generated between parallel electrodes via an external electric field, produces characteristic glow emission through electron-impact ionization and excitation [47,48]. It operates across DC/AC/RF modes [48], with discharge characteristics governed by voltage, frequency, and gas flow [43]. In DC mode, the discharge exhibits eight alternating bright/dark zones (e.g., Aston dark space, cathode glow, negative glow, positive column) due to the electric field and energy gradients [49]. Typical systems comprise vacuum chambers, electrodes, HV power, and gas/vacuum units. These systems enable surface modification and thin-film deposition that can be applied in biomedicine [50] and environmental remediation [51], with the advantages of low energy consumption, high uniformity, and eco-friendliness [47]. Limitations include vacuum-system complexity and cost [52]. In recent years, in order to expand the application in biomedicine, the research focus has gradually shifted to atmospheric-pressure glow-discharge (APGD) technology.

2.6. Radio Frequency Discharge

Radio frequency discharge (RFD) plasma is generated by ionizing gases via high-frequency alternating electric fields, where oscillating electrons accelerated by electromagnetic fields induce ionization through collisions with neutrals [53]. Power coupling efficiency and plasma uniformity depend on the RF excitation design, achieved either by applying RF voltage across parallel electrodes or inducing currents via external coils, optionally isolated by dielectric windows [54]. Typical systems include RF power supplies, reaction chambers with electrodes or coils, gas or vacuum units, and cooling, though primarily low-pressure cold plasma, atmospheric operation is feasible [55,56]. This technology enables low-temperature, high-activity plasma with tunable density or energy distribution, avoiding thermal damage to sensitive materials, but faces challenges in equipment complexity, electromagnetic interference, and shielding requirements. Key applications span semiconductor manufacturing, surface engineering, biomedical uses, food and textile modification [53], and seed germination control [57].

2.7. Microwave Discharge

Microwave discharge plasma (MWD) is generated by ionizing gases with high-frequency microwaves (0.3–300 GHz, typically 2.45 GHz) from a magnetron, operable at low or atmospheric pressures [54]. Microwaves delivered via waveguides accelerate gas electrons through elastic collisions, inducing ionization and UV and visible photon emission without electrodes, eliminating filamentary discharge risks [33,58]. Key features of microwave discharge plasma include high electron density, efficient production of reactive oxygen or nitrogen species, and its electrode-free operation, which eliminates contamination risks. Systems comprise magnetrons, resonant chambers, and gas units [58], classified by excitation mode or pulsing [59]. MWD is typically applied in the manufacturing of advanced materials, environmental governance, space propulsion, medical treatment, and other fields [54].

2.8. Plasma-Activated Liquid

Plasma-activated liquid (PAL) is generated by exposing liquids to direct or indirect low-temperature plasma [60,61], inducing physicochemical alterations including decreased pH, shifted oxidation–reduction potential, and generation of stable and short-lived reactive species [58]. These changes enable microbial inactivation and organic contaminant degradation [62], with potential metal ion release from electrode erosion [63]. PAL production efficiency depends on plasma–liquid distance, gas type, and treatment conditions [58], achievable via diverse discharges including MWD, DBD, RFD, and GAD. Key advantages comprise cost-effectiveness, elimination of UV-induced damage, enhanced penetration efficacy within microstructures [62], and application scalability. However, a critical challenge for the widespread application of PAL is the stability of its reactive species, which dictates its shelf-life. The activity of PAL is generally maintained for a limited of time (from hours to several days), depending on the liquid’s composition and storage conditions such as temperature and light exposure [62]. Applications span microbial or viral inactivation, pesticide degradation, seed activation, food processing, and nanomaterial synthesis [63]. The antimicrobial and degradation efficacy of PAL is attributed to a complex mixture of short-lived and long-lived reactive species generated in the liquid [64]. The stability of long-lived species is paramount for the “storability” of PAL. Recent research indicates that while physicochemical properties like pH, oxidation–reduction potential (ORP), and electrical conductivity (EC) can remain stable for up to 30 days at 4 °C, the concentrations of key antimicrobial agents like H2O2 and nitrites can decay significantly after just 5 days of storage. This inherent instability presents a major bottleneck, and future research must focus on developing stable PAL formulations, possibly through the use of additives (e.g., stabilizers, buffers) or optimized generation protocols, to realize its full industrial potential [65].

3. ACP Applications for Plant-Based Foods

Cold plasma treatment extends food shelf-life by inactivating hydrolytic enzymes, suppressing microbial growth, decomposing pesticides, and eliminating insects [19]. It also enhances bioactive compound extraction, assists drying of aromatic plants, and promotes seedling germination and growth. This section focuses on ACP applications in plant-derived foods.

3.1. Microbial Inactivation

Conventional microbial decontamination of plant-based foods risks promoting antibiotic-resistant pathogens and altering food composition through chemical residues [19]. ACP overcomes these limitations by inactivating broad-spectrum microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, spores, viruses, and biofilms, while preserving food quality through near-ambient temperature operation [36,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75]. The effect of ACP treatment on microbial inactivation is presented in Table 1. The antimicrobial efficacy arises from three synergistic mechanisms detailed below.
Reactive species induce structural damage to microbial envelopes. Reactive oxygen or nitrogen species damage microbial envelopes by disrupting chemical bonds in peptidoglycan or lipopolysaccharide layers [71,76,77]. The primary mechanisms of microbial inactivation are illustrated in Figure 2. This process triggers lipid peroxidation and amino acid oxidation in membranes, ultimately causing cell death. For instance, RF plasma treatment inactivated Escherichia coli (E. coli) on walnuts through membrane rupture [78], while DBD plasma disrupted Bacillus tequilensis on black peppercorns [79], and APPJ achieved complete E. coli inactivation [80].
Charged particles cause electrostatic membrane breakdown. Electrons and ions generate electrostatic stress exceeding membrane tensile strength, resulting in cytoplasmic leakage and intracellular invasion of ROS/RNS that oxidatively damage DNA [81], inhibiting proliferation [71]. This mechanism is evidenced by APPJ treatment smoothing Bacillus subtilis membranes in black pepper and liquid systems [82].
The combined action of the mechanisms allows ACP to eliminate diverse microorganisms: spore-formers like Bacillus subtilis [83] and Bacillus cereus [84], fungi including yeasts [85] and Aspergillus bisporus [86], parasitic protozoa such as Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts [87], and pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella enterica [88], Listeria monocytogenes [89], and Candida albicans [90].
Inactivation efficacy is modulated by experimental parameters. Environmental conditions (pH, moisture, temperature) influence microbial susceptibility [19], while experimental settings (gas composition, voltage, treatment time) govern reactive species generation [19,79]. Microbial characteristics (species, initial load) further determine resistance levels [19]. For example, Aspergillus inactivation on walnuts required optimized RF plasma parameters [78], and Bacillus tequilensis reduction on black peppercorns correlated with water activity, treatment duration, and voltage [79].
Table 1. Effect of ACP treatment on microbial inactivation.
Table 1. Effect of ACP treatment on microbial inactivation.
No.SampleMicroorganismEquipmentParametersResultsReference
1Juglans regia L.Coliforms, MoldsRF20, 30, 40, 50 W; 10, 15, 20 minMicrobial activity decreased gradually with increasing power and time[78]
2Black peppercornsIndigenous bacteria, Bacillus tequilensis sporesDBD9.7, 9.8, 10.2, 10.5, 10.6 kV; 7.9, 10.0, 15.0, 20.0, 22.1 minMicrobial inactivation improved with increased water activity, treatment time, and voltage[79]
3Black pepper grainsBacillus subtilis vegetative cells and sporesAPPJ280 GHz, 50 mA, 600 W, 30 minMicrobial activity decreased with increased voltage and treatment time[82]
4Black pepper seeds, allspice berries, and juniper berriesAspergillus niger, Bacillus subtilisMWArgon, 20 L/min, 2.45 GHz, 600 W, 15–60 sDegree of bacterial inactivation increased with prolonged treatment time[83]
5Black pepperBacillus cereusAPPJ40, 50, 60 L/min; 800, 900, 1000 W; 0–10 minSignificant reduction in vegetative cells of Bacillus cereus[84]
6Coriandrum sativumCryptosporidium parvum oocystsAPPJ47 GHz; 549 W; 0, 30, 90, 180 sMicrobial activity decreased with increased treatment time[87]
7Curcuma longa var. SuvarnaAerobic viable cellDBD25 kV; 3, 5, 7 minAntibacterial effect declined with prolonged processing time[91]
8Dried saffron stigmaMolds, Yeasts, Escherichia coliAPPJAir/Argon, 1 L/min; 40, 70, 100 W; 1, 5, 10 minMicrobial load decreased with increased exposure time[92]
9Crocus sativus L.Escherichia coli (E. coli) APPJHelium, 1 L/min; 12 GHz; 5, 6, 7 kV; 0–12 minComplete E. coli inactivation[80]
10Crocus sativus L.TVC, Coliforms, Molds, YeastsRFOxygen, 70, 90, 110 W; 5, 10, 15, 30 minMaximum microbial log reduction at 110 W for 30 min[93]
11Red mini-rosesMicrobiota diversityDBD, GD962 Hz, 18 kV, 20 minReduced microbial diversity without altering dominant populations[94]
12Agaricus bisporusAerobic colonyDBDOptimal: 95 kV, 130 Hz, 10 minEffective spoilage microbe reduction, minimizing contamination risk[86]
13Pleurotus ostreatusSoil-borne pathogensDBD2 L/min, 6 kV; 5–25 minOptimal at 25 min; colony count decreased with time[95]
14Flammulina velutipesAdherent Bacteria, Escherichia coliAPPJ, PAW83 kHz, 0.68 kV, 77 mA, 0–30 minCFU reduction proportional to treatment time; NTAPPJ reduced bacterial adhesion; PAW increased cell death and lipid peroxidation[96]
15Shiitake mushroomsBacteriaDBD, GAD-PAWN2-O2 (3:1), 200 W, 1200 W, 20 minPAW outperformed DBD in postharvest quality preservation[97]
16Vitis viniferaAerobic bacteria, E. coliAPPJHelium, 20 kHz, 6.5 W, 4–5.5 kV, 1–3 minComplete aerobic bacteria reduction; extended shelf-life (28 days)[98]
17D. longanDiutina catenulataDBDArgon/air mixtures, 4 L/min, 5 kHz, 53 W, 24 kV, 180–360 sReduced microbial density; expanded antibacterial zones over time[90]
18Dried jujubeAspergillus niger sporesDBD50 Hz; 50–70 kV; 0–20 minReduced spore viability and toxicity[99]
19Palm datesAspergillus nigerDBD10 kHz, 8–30 W, 5–10 kV, 3 minInhibited A. niger growth[100]
20CowpeaCallosobruchus maculatusDBD65% O2/30% N2/5% CO2; 20–70 kV, 1–3 minMortality/sterility increased with time and voltage[101]
21Cichorium intybus L. Biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E. coliAPPJHelium, 2 SLM, 25 kHz, 8 kV, 3 minMembrane disruption; E. coli more sensitive than P. aeruginosa[102]
22Camellia sinensis var. sinensisMolds, yeasts, E. coli, Enterococcus faecalisDBD20–25 kV; 2–8 minComplete inactivation at 25 kV/8 min; E. coli required higher MIC/MBC than S. aureu[103]
23Almond slicesMolds, yeasts, Staphylococcus aureusAPPJHelium, 10 SLM, 17 V, 2.26 A, 5–20 minMicrobial reduction proportional to treatment duration after 20 min[104]
24MulberriesE. coliDBD0.1–1 A, 30 sROS accumulation induced apoptosis; damage intensity current-dependent[105]
25Vegetables/fruits/nuts/
powders
E. coli O157:H7, S. Typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenesDBD14.4 kHz, 51.7 W, 8 kV, 30 minSurface roughness negatively correlated with inactivation efficiency[106]

3.2. Enzyme Activity

In plant-based food systems, endogenous enzymes significantly influence physicochemical quality attributes including textural properties, color characteristics, flavor profile, and storage stability [107]. Certain enzymes, such as pectinases and esterases, play a positive role in biotransformation processes such as flavor development and postharvest ripening. However, lipolytic enzymes and oxidoreductases may lead to undesirable effects, including nutrient loss, accelerated browning, and off-flavor formation [19]. ACP has emerged as a non-thermal alternative to conventional processing and has attracted extensive research into its effects on enzyme activity [108].
Plasma treatment systematically alters enzyme structures. The mechanism of cold plasma affecting microorganism cells and enzyme activity is shown in Figure 2. For instance, DBD exposure treatment at varying durations reduced peroxidase (POD) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) activity via conformational shifts involving decreased α-helix and increased β-sheet content, which exposes hydrophobic aromatic amino acids and heme groups [109]. Jia et al. [110] reported that plasma treatment under optimized conditions suppressed chlorophyllase and pheophorbide a oxygenase (PAO) activity in tomatoes while downregulating the expression of chlorophyll metabolism-related genes, thereby delaying chlorophyll degradation. Subsequent studies confirmed inhibition of enzymes during storage, including polygalacturonase (PG), pectin methylesterase (PME), 3α-L-arabinofuranosidase (3α-L-Af), 4β-galactosidase (4β-Gal), cellulase (Cx), and β-glucosidase (β-Glu) [111].
Figure 2. Mechanism of cold plasma affecting microorganism cells [75] and enzyme activity [112] (reprinted with permission, copyright © 1999–2025 John Wiley & Sons).
Figure 2. Mechanism of cold plasma affecting microorganism cells [75] and enzyme activity [112] (reprinted with permission, copyright © 1999–2025 John Wiley & Sons).
Foods 14 02999 g002
ACP regulates enzyme activity through dynamic multifactorial interactions at physical, chemical, and biological levels [113], influenced by treatment conditions, plasma source, and processing volume. Inactivation or activation depends on enzyme-reactive species contact degree, enzyme stability, structural integrity, and stress response capacity [114]. Enzymes categorize as ACP-resistant such as lipases, catalase, and superoxide dismutase, or ACP-sensitive such as phenol oxidases, peroxidases, and lysozymes. Resistant enzymes show transient activity enhancement under mild oxidative stress via conformational optimization or active site exposure, declining with prolonged exposure. Sensitive enzymes rapidly succumb to ROS/RNS, which attack critical groups and induce denaturation/peptide bond cleavage/aggregation [19]. Amino acid residue can be modified and its secondary structure changed during ACP treatment. Amino acids undergo oxidative, sulfonylation, hydroxylation, amidation, or ring-opening reactions with ROS or radicals, particularly at side chains like thiol groups and aromatic rings, where sulfhydryl residues form disulfide bonds promoting aggregation [113]. Additionally, ACP targets secondary structures, significantly reducing α-helix while increasing β-sheet content in polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) to suppress browning-related enzyme activity [114,115].

3.3. Mycotoxin Degradation

Mycotoxins such as aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), ochratoxin A (OTA), and deoxynivalenol (DON) are toxic fungal metabolites prevalent in plant-based foods, posing significant health risks [116,117,118,119,120]. ACP degrades these contaminants through three primary mechanisms: direct molecular decomposition, inactivation of toxigenic fungi or spores, and interference with biosynthesis pathways [121].
ACP directly fragments mycotoxin molecules through radicals and reactive species generated during treatment [122]. The degradation efficiency depends on molecular structure, with key functional groups targeted by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ultraviolet radiation. Taking AFB1 as an example (Figure 3), radicals (•OH, H•) and ROS (O3, H2O2) oxidize critical structures, including the C8=C9 double bond, lactone ring, and cyclopentenone group responsible for its carcinogenicity [30]. Similarly, DON’s toxicity stems from the C3 hydroxyl, C9=C10 double bond, and C9-C10 epoxy groups [121], while patulin’s conjugated double bonds and lactone ring are vulnerable [121].
Degradation efficacy is influenced by food matrix complexity. Mycotoxins embedded in plant components degrade slower than in pure solutions due to interactions with proteins or carbohydrates. Zhang et al. [123] demonstrated this effect where DON degradation reached 98% in aqueous solution but only 61% in wheat grain.
Synergistic effects enhance detoxification. While UV radiation from ACP alone is insufficient for complete degradation [122], its combination with radicals amplifies fragmentation. Increased H2O2 and NO3 concentrations in plasma-treated cells confirm radical involvement [124]. Akhavan-Mahdavi et al. [125] validated this synergy, showing DBD plasma simultaneously reduced aflatoxin levels and mold/yeast counts in pistachios without altering color, moisture, hardness, or sensory properties. Esmaeili et al. [126] further confirmed no significant changes in free fatty acids or polyphenols after optimized plasma treatment. The effect of ACP treatment on mycotoxin degradation is shown in Table 2.
However, degradation products require careful assessment. Although fragmentation typically yields non-toxic compounds (e.g., formic acid, CO2), some metabolites may retain or increase toxicity [30]. Therefore, systematic evaluation of detoxification efficacy across mycotoxin classes remains essential [30].
Figure 3. Cold plasma technique in controlling mycotoxins [29] (reprinted with permission, copyright © 2025 Elsevier B.V.) and degradation pathways of aflatoxin (AFB1) [30,122,127,128] (reprinted with permission from ref. [30], copyright © 2025 Informa UK Limited).
Figure 3. Cold plasma technique in controlling mycotoxins [29] (reprinted with permission, copyright © 2025 Elsevier B.V.) and degradation pathways of aflatoxin (AFB1) [30,122,127,128] (reprinted with permission from ref. [30], copyright © 2025 Informa UK Limited).
Foods 14 02999 g003
Table 2. Effect of ACP treatment on mycotoxin degradation.
Table 2. Effect of ACP treatment on mycotoxin degradation.
No.SampleMycotoxinEquipmentParametersResultsReference
1Pistacia vera L.AflatoxinDBDOxygen, 25 kHz, 89 W, 15 kV, 60/120 sSignificantly reduced the number of molds and yeasts after 120 days of storage; notably decreased aflatoxin content[125]
2Pistacia vera L.Aspergillus flavus, AflatoxinDBD-APPJAir–argon (0%, 50%, 100%), 10–20 kV, 5–15 minHigh degradation rate under optimal treatment conditions; no significant difference between control and cold plasma-treated samples[126]
3Pistacia vera L.Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)RF12.56 kHz, 80 W; 10, 15 minAflatoxin content significantly decreased[129]
4WheatDeoxynivalenol (DON)DDBD160–240 Hz, 60–140 V, duty cycles 20–99%, 25 minACP achieved a degradation efficiency of up to 98% in aqueous DON solutions, while 61% degradation in wheat samples[123]
5Corn kernelsAflatoxin B1 (AFB1)DBD0.18 W/cm–0.31 W/cm, 30–480 sComplete removal of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)[130]

3.4. Pesticide Degradation

Pesticides, chemical agents that are crucial in agricultural production, have become primary contaminants in plant-based foods due to large-scale application [8,131], posing risks of acute or chronic poisoning, cancer, reproductive disorders, immune dysfunction, and neurological damage in humans [132]. Effective methods for eliminating pesticide residues remain key to reducing human exposure risks [133,134,135]. Cold plasma demonstrates superior pesticide degradation efficacy and has attracted significant attention recently [136]. Facilitating practical applications requires understanding mechanisms and detecting intermediates [131]. ACP primarily degrades pesticides through synergistic physical–chemical effects, as illustrated in Figure 4. The effect of ACP treatment on pesticide degradation is summarized in Table 3. The core mechanisms involve several key processes.
First, degradation is predominantly driven by highly reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS), with the potent hydroxyl radical (•OH) playing a particularly crucial role [31]. The specific action of •OH varies with pesticide structure. For organophosphates such as malathion, parathion, or chlorpyrifos, •OH radicals target the sulfur atom in the thiophosphate group (P=S), converting it to a more labile P=O structure. This transformation is often followed by cleavage of vulnerable P-S or C-S ester bonds, fragmenting the molecule into smaller, less toxic intermediates that are subsequently more readily mineralized. In contrast, for pesticides containing stable aromatic rings, such as atrazine or carbaryl, •OH radicals initiate hydroxylation reactions and subsequent ring-opening. This disrupts the stable ring structure, leading to carboxylic acid formation and eventual mineralization into CO2, H2O, and inorganic ions.
Second, concurrently generated ultraviolet (UV) radiation (100–380 nm) during plasma discharge contributes significantly. This UV radiation possesses sufficient energy to directly cleave chemical bonds within pesticide molecules, a photolytic effect that works synergistically with the chemical attacks initiated by the reactive species [137].
Third, the high-voltage electric fields inherent within the plasma exert an influence. These fields can induce molecular polarization or ionization of pesticide molecules, weakening their chemical bonds. This bond weakening renders the molecules more susceptible to attack by ROS/RNS, thereby promoting more efficient degradation overall.
Finally, the degradation pathways are sensitive to the system pH, exhibiting distinct mechanisms under different conditions. Under acidic conditions, hydroxyl radicals generated via water ionization directly oxidize pesticides. Conversely, in alkaline environments, hydroxyl radicals recombine to form hydrogen peroxide, making indirect oxidation the more dominant degradation process [31,138].
Table 3. Effect of ACP treatment on pesticide degradation.
Table 3. Effect of ACP treatment on pesticide degradation.
No.SamplePesticideEquipmentParametersResultsReference
1Fresh Spinacia oleracea L.Chlorpyrifos, MalathionVolume DBD100 W, 20 kV, 20 minMicrobial contamination and pesticide residue analysis showed that cold plasma treatment significantly reduced spinach contamination; chlorpyrifos and malathion decreased by 90%[139]
2Glycine. max (L.) Merr.ChlorpyrifosDBD1–2 kV, 2–6 minCold plasma (CP) treatment achieved a degradation rate of 65% for pesticides on soybeans, even high concentrations degraded by 50%[140]
3BlueberryBoscalid, ImidaclopridDBD60/80 kV; 2, 5 minDegradation rates: Boscalid 80%, Imidacloprid 76%; after 1 min of cold plasma treatment, polyphenol and flavonoid content increased[141]
4Grape, StrawberryChlorpyrifos, CarbarylPAW1 kHz, 5.66 W, 5–30 minChlorpyrifos reduction: grape 79%, strawberry 69%; carbaryl reduction: grape 86%, strawberry 73%; no significant changes in color and firmness; slight changes in ascorbic acid levels[62]
5LettucesChlorpyrifos, MalathionDBD60–80 kV, 30–180 sDBD treatment significantly degraded malathion and chlorpyrifos in water and lettuce; at 80 kV for 180 s, degradation efficiencies were 64.6% and 62.7%, respectively; no noticeable damage to lettuce quality including color and chlorophyll content; ascorbic acid significantly decreased[142]
6CornChlorpyrifos, CarbarylDBD100–1200 Hz, 150–1500 mL·min−1, 4–20 W, 20–60 sUnder 1000 mL·min−1, 20 W, 1200 Hz for 60 s, chlorpyrifos degradation efficiency reached 86.2%, Carbaryl 66.6%; moisture and starch content significantly decreased, acid value increased, vitamin B2 unchanged[143]
7Edible WolfberryOmethoateSurface DBD9 kHz, 0–20 kV, 0.1–30 minAt 10 kV for 30 min, optimal degradation rate reached 99%, with complete conversion into non-toxic species (e.g., PO43−, H2O, SO42−, CO2)[144]
8Lycium barbarumOmethoate, Dichlorvos (DDVP)Gas Phase Surface Discharge Plasma (GPSD)5–15 kV, 0.5–30 minMaximum degradation rates reached 99.55% and 96.83%; completely degraded into non-toxic species with no impact on Lycium barbarum quality[145]
9Solanum lycopersicumChlorothalonilPAL-U (PAW, PABS)600 W, 7 kV, 20 L/min; solution treatment 1–10 min, soaking for 15 minMaximum reduction in residue was 89.23%, with no impact on sample quality[146]
10Solanum lycopersicumChlorothalonil (CTL), Thiram (THM)PAW, Plasma activated buffer solution (PABS)Argon/Oxygen = 98/2, 600 W, 2–7 kV, 1–10 minDegradation rates: 85.3% and 74.2%, respectively; oxidation–reduction potential (ORP) and electrical conductivity (EC) of the solution significantly increased; pH decreased with activation time; no significant effect on tomatoes[147]
Figure 4. Effect of pesticide degradation factors [31] and proposed degradation pathway of (a) Carbyrl and (b) Chlorpyrifos [62] (reprinted with permission, copyright © 2025 Springer Nature).
Figure 4. Effect of pesticide degradation factors [31] and proposed degradation pathway of (a) Carbyrl and (b) Chlorpyrifos [62] (reprinted with permission, copyright © 2025 Springer Nature).
Foods 14 02999 g004

3.5. Bioactive Compound Extraction

Plant-derived bioactive compounds exhibit beneficial effects on human health and demonstrate potential in reducing certain diseases [148,149,150,151,152]. Cold plasma emerges as a green extraction alternative to traditional methods [153,154,155,156], offering low environmental pollution, cost-effectiveness, high extraction efficiency, low energy consumption, and reduced water usage [28]. Under mild conditions, ACP enhances bioactive extraction while yielding extracts with favorable antioxidant and antimicrobial activities [26]. Rezaei et al. [157] reported ACP treatment significantly improved various physicochemical properties of extracted oils while increasing protein content. Zhou et al. [158] demonstrated reduced extraction time and solvent consumption of Lonicera caerulea with both extraction efficiency of active components and antioxidant activity notably enhanced. Elmizadeh et al. [159] achieved higher tanshinone yield from Salvia subg. Perovskia root via combining ACP with microwave extraction.
ACP-generated electrons, ions, and ROS/RNS create cell wall micropores or fractures through oxidation and etching effects to facilitate bioactive release. Additionally, reactive species oxidatively modify cell wall components such as pectin/cellulose/lignin, reducing structural stability and enhancing solvent permeability [160]. Concurrently, reactive species-mediated oxidation improves target compound solubility, hydrophilicity, and other physical properties. Furthermore, UV photons may activate specific enzymes such as phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, or upregulate genes to boost phenolic extraction [28]. ACP effectively disrupts specialized surface structures like glandular trichomes, which are key sites for essential oil biosynthesis and storage. Moderate treatment enhances oil extraction, whereas excessive treatment may cause trichome rupture, reducing yield and altering oil composition [26,161]. For DBD-treated Mentha spicata L., studies have shown that elevating power increased essential oil (EO) yield with higher oxygenated monoterpenes but lower monoterpene hydrocarbons, when compared to controls [162]. DBD pretreatment boosted bioactive components with enhanced radical-scavenging capacity [163], and promoted phenolic release via modifying clove morphology [164]. Additionally, studies confirmed plasma technology’s efficacy in enhancing extraction yields for soybean protein [165] and galactomannan [166], alongside improving water absorption and other physicochemical properties.
ACP remains laboratory-scale, with efficiency depending on plasma parameters, gas type, plant species, and bioactive composition. For instance, nitrogen plasma yields higher total phenolic content (TPC) than other gases. Lu et al. [167] demonstrated nitrogen-derived reactive species activated seed bioactives, whereas air plasma species suppressed them. Further optimization requires elucidating plant–plasma interactions and preventing oxidative byproduct formation [26,28].

3.6. Drying

The drying process critically extends shelf-life, and influences the quality of plant-based foods [112,168], but conventional techniques show some limits, such as inefficiency, prolonged duration, quality deterioration, uneven dehydration, and high costs [169,170,171,172,173,174,175]. Cold plasma pretreatment enhances drying performance by reducing energy consumption, maintaining product quality, and degrading pathogenic microorganisms [112,176,177,178,179]. Kamkari et al. [180] demonstrated air-DBD plasma treatment doubled drying rate with 66% higher moisture diffusivity, 24% lower energy, and 18% decreased shrinkage in cumin. Similarly, ACP improved the Lycium barbarum rehydration ratio via structural modifications facilitating intracellular water and phytochemical release, thereby promoting cellular contraction during drying [181].
ACP enhances drying performance through synergistic mechanisms (Figure 5). Surface modification via the etching effect from ACP-generated photons, electrons, and ROS/RNS [175], which decomposes surface wax layers and keratin matrices, enhancing hydrophilicity to improve wettability. Surface microcracks increase surface area, facilitating heat transfer and moisture migration [112]. Namjoo et al. [182] observed that ACP treatment significantly improved effective moisture diffusivity in cumin seeds with shortening drying time, attributing this acceleration to plasma-induced surface morphology changes that enhanced internal-to-surface moisture transport. Furthermore, ROS may disrupt hydrogen bonds in water, lowering evaporation enthalpy to promote dehydration. Additionally, cellular structure alteration occurs via chemical bond cleavage, weakening cell walls to form micropores and enlarge intercellular spaces [176]. Karim et al. [183] documented that ACP caused disordered cell arrangement, cellular shrinkage, wall rupture, and significant formation of intercellular voids in fresh plant tissues.
Figure 5. Mechanism of plasma pretreatment and its effect in the drying process [75,112] (reprinted with permission from ref. [112], copyright © 1999–2025 John Wiley & Sons). The dash lines indicate that the part shown is a magnifies image of cells during the CP treatment.
Figure 5. Mechanism of plasma pretreatment and its effect in the drying process [75,112] (reprinted with permission from ref. [112], copyright © 1999–2025 John Wiley & Sons). The dash lines indicate that the part shown is a magnifies image of cells during the CP treatment.
Foods 14 02999 g005
Concurrently, ACP affects dried product quality by inhibiting enzymes (e.g., polyphenol oxidase, peroxidase) through ROS/RNS-mediated modifications, including amino acid side-chain hydroxylation, dehydrogenation, nitration, dimerization, peptide bond cleavage, and disulfide bond formation/rupture, collectively altering enzyme conformation. For metalloenzymes, metal ion oxidation also contributes to inactivation [112]. Processing parameters and plant characteristics (morphology, composition, surface features, moisture content) significantly influence treatment efficacy [112]. For example, while optimal treatment duration enhances drying kinetics, excessive exposure may cause surface hardening or structural collapse [184]. Obajemihi et al. [185] demonstrated that prolonged PAW treatment at higher voltages exacerbated tomato cell disruption, reducing drying time by 25%. Conversely, increased electrode–sample distance diminishes reactive species concentration, compromising drying improvement.

3.7. Germination

Regulating seed germination and vegetative growth is essential for plant development and survival [186,187,188,189]. Reactive species generated by cold plasma treatment may alter the physical, chemical, and biochemical properties of plants, thereby positively influencing seed germination [190]. Nitrogen DBD treatment enhances germination rate and vigor [191], while PAW promotes germination via seed matrix modifications [192], demonstrating that PAW treatment effectively promoted germination, possibly due to changes in the seed matrix. Cold plasma increases seed hydrophilicity, optimizing water uptake, while APPJ-induced micro-etching and enzyme activation facilitate germination [193].
ACP treatment of seeds generally involves direct plasma exposure or plasma-activated solutions [190], with germination efficacy influenced by plant species and treatment parameters, the latter including treatment duration, gas composition, and moisture content. Multiple intermittent treatments significantly improved germination potential while slightly increasing germination rate [194], and PAW irrigation significantly enhancing seedling growth [195]. Physically, etching creates seed surface micropores, disrupting waxy barriers to improve oxygen/water permeability for radicle emergence [189]. Biochemically, ROS/RNS act as signaling molecules initiating germination cascades [196], upregulating GA3 oxidase genes to increase GA levels and α-amylase activity while suppressing ABA signaling to break seed dormancy [197,198], activating antioxidant enzymes to scavenge radicals, and accelerating storage compound hydrolysis [190].

3.8. Food Packaging Applications

Beyond direct food treatment, ACP is emerging as a critical enabling technology in food packaging. Its application extends from simple surface sterilization to the sophisticated modification of packaging materials to enhance their functional properties. Most packaging materials used in the food industry, such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), cannot withstand heat, making non-thermal ACP an ideal sterilization method [199]. For instance, studies on packaged cabbage slices, Korean rice cakes, and fish cakes demonstrated significant reductions in bacterial loads, including Salmonella spp., confirming the efficacy of this approach [199]. More profoundly, ACP is used to modify the physicochemical properties of polymer surfaces. By generating a rich source of reactive species, UV light, and energetic ions, ACP can induce surface etching and introduce polar functional groups (e.g., hydroxyl, carboxyl). This process increases surface energy, roughness, and hydrophilicity [199]. Enhanced surface polarity and roughness significantly improve the adhesion of antimicrobial or antioxidant coatings to otherwise inert polymer films. This allows for the development of more effective and stable active packaging systems that can slowly release protective compounds onto the food surface, extending shelf-life and improving safety [200]. In addition, ACP can be used to treat surfaces for the immobilization of sensors or indicators. For example, a pH-responsive indicator film was developed using purple basil anthocyanins and nano-TiO2. The incorporation of TiO2, which can be enhanced by plasma treatment, provided antibacterial activity and improved the film’s mechanical and barrier properties, allowing it to detect food spoilage via a distinct color change [200].

4. Cold Plasma Effects on Plant-Based Food Quality

The quality of plant-based foods, defined by sensory attributes, nutritional characteristics, and chemical properties (pH, acidity), critically determines consumer acceptance [201]. Much of the current research on ACP has focused on plant-based raw materials such as grains, nuts, spices, and fresh produce, which are key ingredients in the wider food system. Variations in ACP treatment parameters significantly influence the quality of these materials through modification of surface molecular structures (Figure 6). This alters key physicochemical properties [202,203,204], and further affects textural parameters such as hardness, chewiness, and overall mouthfeel. Such functional modifications demonstrate cold plasma’s potential to enhance sensory attributes and overall quality [201]. This section summarizes ACP effects on plant-based food quality including physicochemical properties, nutritional composition, and functional characteristics (Table S2).
Figure 6. Cold plasma effects on plant-based food quality.
Figure 6. Cold plasma effects on plant-based food quality.
Foods 14 02999 g006

4.1. Sensory Attributes and Physicochemical Properties

4.1.1. Color

Color serves as a vital indicator of plant quality, freshness, and nutritional content, directly impacting consumer perception [205]. ACP treatment can induce changes in color, and these effects can be bidirectional—either desirable (e.g., color stabilization, enhanced vibrancy) or undesirable (e.g., browning, bleaching). These changes stem from processing or intrinsic chemical reactions [206,207,208] and the interactions involve oxidation, degradation, or structural modifications (e.g., chain shortening/elongation, hydrogenation, isomerization) [209]. Concomitant cell wall disruption and pH decline from plasma–surface interactions further impact pigment stability [210,211,212]. Studies consistently report measurable color alterations. Examples include darkening in walnut kernels [78], lightening in pistachios [129], enhanced vibrancy in yam powder [213], and improved whiteness in taro starch [214], quantified through parameters like color difference, lightness, and browning index. However, significant variability exists, with several studies reporting no statistically significant color changes in black pepper [79], red pepper powder [215], and Agaricus bisporus [86] after plasma treatment. This variability is fundamentally matrix- and parameter-dependent.
The key factors determining the direction and magnitude of change include (i) pigment type and stability, where susceptibility varies significantly between chlorophyll, carotenoids, anthocyanins, and betalains [209]; (ii) food matrix composition, as lipid content, water activity, surface morphology, and the presence of protective compounds critically modulate plasma–pigment interactions [78,129]; (iii) processing parameters, where treatment time, power input, gas composition, and plasma source dictate the balance between pigment degradation, stabilization, or minimal impact, with shorter times/lower power often mitigating changes observed under prolonged exposure [78,86,129,215]. Therefore, systematic investigation into the precise reaction kinetics and degradation pathways of specific pigments under defined plasma conditions is necessary to elucidate fundamental mechanisms. Furthermore, the role of the food matrix requires comprehensive exploration, particularly concerning lipid content, microstructure, and protective components as either a barrier or facilitator of plasma–pigment interactions. Additionally, establishing threshold plasma parameters that trigger significant color changes across diverse food categories is essential for process optimization.

4.1.2. Texture

Texture critically influences plant-based food quality and consumer satisfaction. ACP treatment generally impacts texture, with a primary beneficial effect being the delay in fruit softening (e.g., olives, tomatoes) [201,208,216,217,218,219], potentially linked to plasma’s positive influence on intercellular adhesion and cell wall structural integrity through modification of pectins or cross-linking [220]. However, surface etching and modification are common mechanisms, often leading to observable microstructural changes such as erosion, agglomeration, cracking, and wrinkling [91,92,213,215]. Plasma treatment has been shown to maintain firmness or elasticity in some fruits [216,217,218,219], cause surface erosion or agglomeration in powders while improving functional properties [213], induce cracks on pepper surfaces [215], wrinkle saffron stigmas [92], reduce ion leakage in basil [221], and alter surface morphology in fenugreek seeds [166]. Surface smoothing and increased porosity have also been documented [214,222]. Conversely, several studies report negligible texture alterations, including unchanged hardness in walnut kernels [78]; no significant changes in cinnamon, black pepper, or fennel [85]; and unaltered surface morphology in green tea powder [103]. Outcome divergence stems from the following factors: (i) matrix properties (such as tissue density, cell wall composition, turgor pressure, surface characteristics, moisture) governing plasma penetration depth [85,103,213,220]; (ii) processing parameters controlling energy deposition; and (iii) mechanistic balance between beneficial polymer cross-linking and detrimental degradation or cell rupture [220,221,223,224,225,226]. Consequently, elucidating plasma-induced modifications of key cell wall polymers and their direct relationships with macroscopic texture, combined with systematic investigation of plasma penetration mechanisms (including gas composition effects), is critical.

4.1.3. Flavor and Aroma

Flavor constitutes the perceptual experience elicited by active volatile compounds during mastication [227,228,229,230]. ACP treatment can alter the flavor and aroma profile of plant-based foods through interactions between plasma-generated reactive species (ROS/RONS, UV photons) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or their precursors via oxidation, degradation, or formation of new compounds [231]. Studies demonstrate clear alterations, including changes in essential oil composition of turmeric [91]; increases in esters, alcohols, ketones, and fatty acids in edible roses [94]; reduced taste or aroma intensity in saffron [92]; and degraded aromatic quality in ginger [222], with sensory evaluations confirming perceptible differences [215]. However, other research indicates minimal impact, reporting no significant changes in flavor, sensory quality, or volatiles in black pepper [84], cinnamon, fennel [85], or almonds [104]. The presence and extent of flavor modification depend critically on the volatile compound profile and stability, food matrix properties, and processing parameters. The chemical nature of key aroma compounds determines reactivity and profile complexity influences perceived change [91,94,232,233,234,235]. Processing parameters is also paramount. Low doses may only affect surface volatiles or highly reactive compounds, while high doses can penetrate and degrade core volatiles [92,104,215]. Plasma source and gas composition dictate the reactive species generated and their selectivity for different VOCs. In addition, powdered and whole foods exhibit different susceptibilities [84,85,104]. Therefore, investigation is essential, which includes mapping degradation kinetics and the pathways of critical aroma compounds, exploring the role of the matrix (especially lipid content and microstructure in shielding or promoting reactions), and optimizing plasma parameters for specific applications to minimize flavor degradation.

4.1.4. Acidity and pH

Acidity and pH are precisely controlled quality indicators in most processed products. ACP treatment commonly induces a decrease in pH and can alter titratable acidity, primarily attributed to the formation of acidic compounds (e.g., HNO3, HNO2, H2O2, H2CO3) from plasma interactions with atmospheric gases (N2, O2, CO2) and surface moisture, with dissolution of acidic species being the key mechanism [201,231]. Studies report decreasing pH trends in fenugreek extract [166], reductions in pH alongside moisture content [236], and higher titratable acidity in treated winter jujube versus controls [111]. However, some studies found no significant pH change post-treatment, as observed in pistachios [129]. Sample physical state and moisture content strongly influence this variability. Liquids or solids with high surface moisture experience greater dissolution of acidic species, whereas dry powders or waxy-cuticle foods exhibit minimal change, confined primarily to the surface [24,129]. Treatment parameters, which determine reactive species dose and gas composition, are crucial [166,201,231,236]. Additionally, inherent buffering capacity (from organic acids, proteins, and minerals) and initial pH can counteract plasma-induced acidification. Therefore, it is essential to systematically measure the buffering capacity of different plant matrices against this acidification.

4.1.5. Hydrophilicity and Hydrophobicity

Cold plasma modifies plant surface properties through mechanisms like waxy layer oxidation and surface etching, thereby affecting water absorption and retention. These surface alterations may further influence viscosity and rheological behavior in plant-based matrices [201]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) oxidize C-H or C=C bonds to introduce polar oxygen-containing functional groups such as hydroxyl (-OH), carbonyl (C=O), and carboxyl (-COOH), thereby enhancing hydrophilicity. Such changes are evaluated through water contact angle, surface free energy, and surface chemical composition analysis via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy or Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Ahmadian et al. [237] found atmospheric cold plasma treatment of Hyssopus officinalis preserved its fundamental structure without forming new functional groups, yet significantly reduced the water contact angle, indicating improved wettability. Since surface chemistry and structure jointly influence contact angles in heterogeneous materials [238], increased roughness enhances hydrophilicity independently. This aligns with Shokoohi et al. [239], who demonstrated enhanced hydrophilicity in thyme following atmospheric cold plasma treatment.

4.1.6. Water Activity

Water activity (aw) is a critical indicator of free water availability in materials, influencing microbial growth, enzymatic activity, and chemical reaction rates. Microbial proliferation occurs readily when aw > 0.85 but is inhibited below aw < 0.6. Current research [215] shows higher sample aw correlates with more pronounced microbial inactivation by cold plasma treatment. Common evaluation metrics include moisture content, weight loss rate, and electrolyte leakage rate. When plasma interacts with water molecules, the generated reactive ROS initiate various chemical pathways, thereby reducing the proportion of free water by inactivating microorganisms and inhibiting their metabolic water production [29]. Wiktor et al. [83] observed reduced aw and increased dry matter in black pepper, allspice, and juniper berries following plasma treatment. Similarly, Ramkumar et al. [236] reported decreasing moisture content trends.

4.2. Nutritional Value

4.2.1. Antioxidants

Antioxidants inhibit free radicals and prevent oxidation, crucial for plant-based food quality [156,240,241]. Common types include phenolics, vitamins C/E, and flavonoids, evaluated through assays such as DPPH, ORAC, ABTS, and FRAP [231]. Phenolic compounds are key determinants of antioxidant potential [156,231,242]. Cold plasma acts as an abiotic elicitor that may enhance phenolic biosynthesis potentially through ATP induction and accelerated sugar utilization [243], or facilitate phenolic release via cell membrane or wall degradation [244]. However, the effect of cold plasma on total phenolic content remains controversial, as plasma-generated species can degrade phenolic aromatic rings, reducing total phenolics [231]. Flavonoids exhibit similar variability, with increased content observed in Nelumbo nucifera powder due to CP treatment, which caused structural changes that facilitate cellular component leaching [231,245]. Similar enhancements for flavonoids post-treatment occurred in black pepper [83], rose [94], and turmeric powder [246]. Vitamin sensitivity varies significantly, with thiamine, folate, and vitamins A/C/E being particularly labile [24,231]. Most research focuses on ascorbic acid stability and indicates minimal impact of cold plasma on ascorbic acid content [24,215]. Bai et al. [204] found no significant change in total phenolics or antioxidant activity but reported reduced allicin content. However, prolonged treatment may decrease levels via ROS-mediated oxidation [201]. Hemmati [91] observed increased phenolics and flavonoids in turmeric but decreased carotenoids and tocopherols with reduced antioxidant activity. GAD treatment enhanced active components in Crocus sativus, including crocin, picrocrocin, and total phenolics with enhanced antioxidant capacity [247].

4.2.2. Proteins

Proteins are essential components significantly contributing to nutritional value and quality attributes [248,249]. ACP treatment can modify protein structure and functionality, with plasma-generated ROS/RONS inducing amino acid side-chain oxidation, peptide bond cleavage, and protein cross-linking, altering secondary/tertiary structures and affecting solubility, aggregation, and functional properties [29,60,61,250,251,252,253,254]. Studies report altered amino acid profiles and depolymerization in yam flour [213], and increased content in camellia seeds, possibly due to enhanced extractability [157]. However, inconsistencies exist, as evidenced by preserved total protein content in mushrooms [86]. The extent of modification fundamentally depends on protein structural features along with susceptible amino acid residues and matrix composition (such as lipids, antioxidants, carbohydrates, pH) [86,213,254]. Critical processing parameters encompass plasma source, gas composition, and treatment intensity, where low doses induce minimal unfolding while high doses provoke severe oxidation or aggregation [250,253]. The balance between oxidative cleavage and oxidative cross-linking is modulated by protein type, concentration, microenvironment, and specific ROS/RNS profiles [250,251,252]. Understanding functional property changes in plant protein isolates or concentrates induced by plasma gas-specific modifications requires further investigation. Systematic establishment of dose-response relationships for structural and functional alterations across key plant proteins remains essential.

4.2.3. Lipids

Lipids are hydrophobic or amphiphilic biomolecules crucial for energy storage, signaling, and metabolic regulation [67]. Fatty acids are classified as saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), or polyunsaturated (PUFA), with PUFA being prone to oxidative rancidity [255]. ROS targets the positions of unsaturated fatty acids, forming carbon-centered radicals which produce carbon-centered radicals. These initiate lipid peroxidation chain reactions, ultimately generating aldehydes [249] or mediating cross-linking reactions with biomolecules [29]. Plasma treatment generally negatively impacts lipid stability. Zeraatpisheh et al. [129] reported increased UFAs and elevated peroxide value (PV) post-treatment. It is speculated that it may be related to the oxidation of active substances such as hydroxyl radicals, ROS, and singlet oxygen. Thus, adding antioxidants is recommended to mitigate plasma-induced lipid oxidation [201,249]. However, some studies show divergent results, and susceptibility variability stems from lipid composition and location, food matrix properties, and processing parameters. Shirani et al. [104] found no significant PV changes in APPJ-treated almond slices, and Zhang et al. [115] observed minimal effects on fatty acid values in ACP-treated wheat. Esmaeili et al. [126] detected no significant differences in PV or free fatty acid content pre- and post-treatment.

4.2.4. Carbohydrates

Carbohydrates, as primary energy sources in foods, undergo structural modifications under ACP treatment, altering plant-derived food properties [256,257]. ACP induces novel functional groups and conformational changes in polysaccharides, affecting their content and extraction efficiency [160,258]. Starch is particularly susceptible. For instance, plasma-generated RONS and high-energy electrons oxidize glycosidic bonds, degrading starch molecules. This hydrolyzes amylose into hydrophilic monosaccharides while amylopectin breakdown elevates relative amylose content. Concurrently, generated acidic functional groups reduce starch crystallinity, amylose content, gelatinization temperature, swelling power, and viscosity [259]. Polymerization and depolymerization reactions may be closely related to treatment parameters and starch variety [259]. Among these, oxygen and nitrogen plasmas are more likely to induce depolymerization, whereas hydrogen and air plasmas exhibit relatively weaker effects. Resultant structural changes manifest in hydration properties like swelling power, water absorption index, and water solubility index [231]. Zhang et al. [123] noted unchanged wheat gluten but reduced starch content with prolonged plasma treatment. Yang et al. [213] observed increased swelling, solubility, and gelatinization viscosity in yam starch due to oxidation-induced cross-linking or hydrogen bond disruption. Gupta et al. [214] reported altered starch granule morphology, reduced agglomeration, decreased crystallinity, and improved freeze–thaw stability, confirming plasma’s efficacy in modifying starch properties.

5. Future Perspectives

ACP technology leverages non-thermal equilibrium to generate reactive species under mild conditions, offering high integration and energy efficiency without denaturing thermosensitive components [260]. Its core mechanism for pathogenic microorganism inactivity combines physicochemical etching and reactive species penetration to disrupt microbial cellular structures and inhibit metabolite accumulation. Redox reactions efficiently degrade pesticide residues like organophosphates, which establish a “zero secondary pollution” decontamination model that reduces exposure risks and extends plant-based product shelf life. As a novel pretreatment technology, ACP optimizes plant drying kinetics, enhances bioactive compound extraction, and improves seed germination and growth [30]. Additionally, ACP holds significant potential to enable personalized nutrition trends. Specifically, it can reduce protein allergenicity (e.g., in soy or peanuts) [256], increase resistant starch for low-glycemic foods, and enhance mineral bioavailability by degrading antinutritional factors [261]. This positions ACP as a foundational technology for tailored health-oriented food systems [262]. Treated samples could retain physicochemical properties, sensory quality, and nutritional value, with some even achieving simultaneous quality preservation and functional enhancement.
Despite these advantages, industrial application still faces bottlenecks: limited action space dimension, incomplete mechanistic understanding due to complex plasma–substrate interactions, and insufficient toxicogenomic assessment of contaminant degradation intermediates [30]. Scaling challenges include plasma source coupling efficiency discrepancies and treatment non-uniformity. Solutions require modular reactor systems, optimized energy efficiency, and enhanced industrial-scale processing [30]. Furthermore, advanced plasma molecular dynamics with machine learning to predict reactive species kinetics and biomacromolecule interactions will provide robust support for process optimization [259]. Since ACP’s effects on plant-based foods are highly matrix-dependent, an intelligent parameter control system must be established. Additionally, strict safety agreements integrated with photoacoustic detection and multi-stage exhaust modules are essential to limit byproducts and ensure operational safety. Clear industrial guidelines must support rational implementation in food safety and quality assurance [201].

6. Conclusions

ACP technology demonstrates significant potential in plant-based food processing through pollutant removal, plant growth promotion, and enhanced bioactive compound extraction. This review systematically summarizes recent advances in ACP technology for plant-based foods, focusing on its mechanisms and impacts on plant material quality attributes. Technology effectively degrades pesticide residues while reducing microorganisms and metabolites via synergistic actions of reactive species and electromagnetic fields. Additionally, ACP optimizes plant drying kinetics, enhances active component extraction efficiency, and promotes seed germination and seedling growth.
However, as an emerging technology, ACP still needs in-depth research. Establishing mathematical models’ correlation treatment parameters with quality effects is crucial for process optimization. Additionally, developing large-scale processing facilities is necessary to overcome key challenges in uniformity control. Moreover, the development of standardized assessment systems encompassing chemical composition, bioactivity, and toxicological safety is essential. Formulation of industry application guidelines based on risk–benefit analysis is required to enhance operational efficiency and safety assurance. Addressing these challenges will enable ACP technology to achieve broader industrial adoption while ensuring safety and efficacy.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods14172999/s1 [78,79,83,84,86,87,91,92,93,94,103,104,123,125,126,129,157,164,166,181,185,204,214,221,237,239,247,263,264,265,266,267], Table S1. Comparative analysis of major ACP generation systems; Table S2. Effects of ACP treatment on the quality of plant-based foods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L.; methodology, D.Y.; investigation, D.Y., J.H., H.H., J.S., and Z.Y.; data curation, D.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L. and D.Y.; writing—review and editing, S.L.; visualization, S.L. and D.Y.; supervision, C.Z.; project administration, S.L.; funding acquisition, C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2023M731390); the Cross-Innovation Open Project of Food Flavor and Health, Beijing Technology and Business University (FFHCI-2025019); and the Senior Talent Program of Jiangsu University (No. 20JDG074).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Stoev, S.D. Food Safety and Increasing Hazard of Mycotoxin Occurrence in Foods and Feeds. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 887–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Leskovac, A.; Petrović, S. Pesticide Use and Degradation Strategies: Food Safety, Challenges and Perspectives. Foods 2023, 12, 2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Alenyorege, E.A.; Ma, H.; Ayim, I.; Zhou, C.; Wu, P.; Hong, C.; Osae, R. Effect of Multi-frequency Ultrasound Surface Washing Treatments on Escherichia coli Inactivation and Some Quality Characteristics of Non-heading Chinese Cabbage. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42, e13747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alenyorege, E.A.; Ma, H.; Ayim, I.; Aheto, J.H.; Hong, C.; Zhou, C. Effect of Multi-Frequency Multi-Mode Ultrasound Washing Treatments on Physicochemical, Antioxidant Potential and Microbial Quality of Tomato. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2019, 13, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Qi, Y.; Yang, Y.; Hassane Hamadou, A.; Li, B.; Xu, B. Gentle Debranning as a Technology to Reduce Microbial and Deoxynivalenol Levels in Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Its Application in Milling Industry. J. Cereal Sci. 2022, 107, 103518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Okonkwo, C.E.; Chen, L.; Zhou, C. Multimode Ultrasonic-Assisted Decontamination of Fruits and Vegetables: A Review. Food Chem. 2024, 450, 139356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, H.; Apaliya, M.T.; Mahunu, G.K.; Chen, L.; Li, W. Control of Ochratoxin A-Producing Fungi in Grape Berry by Microbial Antagonists: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Azam, S.M.R.; Ma, H.; Xu, B.; Devi, S.; Siddique, M.A.B.; Stanley, S.L.; Bhandari, B.; Zhu, J. Efficacy of Ultrasound Treatment in the Removal of Pesticide Residues from Fresh Vegetables: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 97, 417–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alenyorege, E.A.; Ma, H.; Ayim, I.; Zhou, C. Ultrasound Decontamination of Pesticides and Microorganisms in Fruits and Vegetables: A Review. J. Food Saf. Food Qual.-Arch. Leb. 2018, 69, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, Y.; Li, C.; Cui, H.; Lin, L. Antimicrobial Mechanism of Pulsed Light for the Control of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Its Application in Carrot Juice. Food Control 2019, 106, 106751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Z.; Jin, R.; Qiao, Y.; Liu, J.; He, Z.; Jia, M.; Jiang, Y. Influencing Factors, Kinetics, and Pathways of Pesticide Degradation by Chlorine Dioxide and Ozone: A Comparative Review. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 5154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, J.; Huangfu, X.; Huang, R.; Liang, Y.; Wu, S.; Liu, H.; Witkowski, B.; Gierczak, T.; Li, S. Evaluating Degradation Efficiency of Pesticides by Persulfate, Fenton, and Ozonation Oxidation Processes with Machine Learning. Environ. Res. 2025, 277, 121548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dagnew, M.; Xue, Q.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, A.; Li, M.; Zhao, C. A Review of Various Advanced Oxidation Techniques for Pesticide Degradation for Practical Application in Aqueous Environments. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hu, J.; Wang, G.; Hou, M.; Du, S.; Han, J.; Yu, Y.; Gao, H.; He, D.; Shi, J.; Lee, Y.-W.; et al. New Hydrolase from Aeromicrobium sp. HA for the Biodegradation of Zearalenone: Identification, Mechanism, and Application. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 2411–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xia, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, M.; Garba, B.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, P. Isolation and Characterization of a Bacillus subtilis Strain with Aflatoxin B 1 Biodegradation Capability. Food Control 2017, 75, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, Q.; Pang, B.; Solairaj, D.; Hu, W.; Legrand, N.N.G.; Ma, J.; Huang, S.; Wu, X.; Zhang, H. Effect of Rhodotorula Mucilaginosa on Patulin Degradation and Toxicity of Degradation Products. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2021, 38, 1427–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kang, C.-Z.; Guo, L.-P.; Zhou, T.; Zhao, D.; Kang, L.-P.; He, Y.-L.; Wang, S.; Zhou, L.-Y. Discussion on Present Situation of Study on Pesticide Residues in Chinese Herbal Medicines. China J. Chin. Mate. Med. 2016, 41, 155–159. [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, M.; Zhou, C.; Wang, B.; Zeng, S.; Mu, R.; Li, G.; Li, B.; Lv, W. Research Progress and Application of Ultrasonic- and Microwave-Assisted Food Processing Technology. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 3707–3731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alaguthevar, R.; Packialakshmi, J.S.; Murugesan, B.; Rhim, J.; Thiyagamoorthy, U. In-package Cold Plasma Treatment to Extend the Shelf Life of Food. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2024, 23, e13318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Zeng, X.; Han, Z.; Brennan, C.S. Non-thermal Technologies and Its Current and Future Application in the Food Industry: A Review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Osae, R.; Essilfie, G.; Alolga, R.N.; Akaba, S.; Song, X.; Owusu-Ansah, P.; Zhou, C. Application of Non-thermal Pretreatment Techniques on Agricultural Products Prior to Drying: A Review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 2585–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Boateng, I.D.; Yang, X. Thermal and Non-Thermal Processing Affect Maillard Reaction Products, Flavor, and Phytochemical Profiles of Ginkgo Biloba Seed. Food Biosci. 2021, 41, 101044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Boateng, I.D.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y.; Saalia, F.K.; Yang, X. Non-thermal Pretreatment Affects Ginkgo biloba L. Seed’s Product Qualities, Sensory, and Physicochemical Properties. J. Food Sci. 2022, 87, 94–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Farooq, S.; Dar, A.H.; Dash, K.K.; Srivastava, S.; Pandey, V.K.; Ayoub, W.S.; Pandiselvam, R.; Manzoor, S.; Kaur, M. Cold Plasma Treatment Advancements in Food Processing and Impact on the Physiochemical Characteristics of Food Products. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 32, 621–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tonks, L. Oscillations in Ionized Gases. In Plasma and Oscillations; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1961; pp. 122–139. ISBN 978-1-4831-9913-9. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pogorzelska-Nowicka, E.; Hanula, M.; Pogorzelski, G. Extraction of Polyphenols and Essential Oils from Herbs with Green Extraction Methods—An Insightful Review. Food Chem. 2024, 460, 140456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cherif, M.M.; Assadi, I.; Khezami, L.; Ben Hamadi, N.; Assadi, A.A.; Elfalleh, W. Review on Recent Applications of Cold Plasma for Safe and Sustainable Food Production: Principles, Implementation, and Application Limits. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Heydari, M.; Carbone, K.; Gervasi, F.; Parandi, E.; Rouhi, M.; Rostami, O.; Abedi-Firoozjah, R.; Kolahdouz-Nasiri, A.; Garavand, F.; Mohammadi, R. Cold Plasma-Assisted Extraction of Phytochemicals: A Review. Foods 2023, 12, 3181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Murtaza, B.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Saleemi, M.K.; Nawaz, M.Y.; Li, M.; Xu, Y. Cold Plasma: A Success Road to Mycotoxins Mitigation and Food Value Edition. Food Chem. 2024, 445, 138378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xiang, Q.; Huangfu, L.; Dong, S.; Ma, Y.; Li, K.; Niu, L.; Bai, Y. Feasibility of Atmospheric Cold Plasma for the Elimination of Food Hazards: Recent Advances and Future Trends. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 4431–4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sojithamporn, P.; Leksakul, K.; Sawangrat, C.; Charoenchai, N.; Boonyawan, D. Degradation of Pesticide Residues in Water, Soil, and Food Products via Cold Plasma Technology. Foods 2023, 12, 4386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mehta, D.; Yadav, S.K. Recent Advances in Cold Plasma Technology for Food Processing. Food Eng. Rev. 2022, 14, 555–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Laroque, D.A.; Seó, S.T.; Valencia, G.A.; Laurindo, J.B.; Carciofi, B.A.M. Cold Plasma in Food Processing: Design, Mechanisms, and Application. J. Food Eng. 2022, 312, 110748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Charoux, C.M.G.; Patange, A.; Lamba, S.; O’Donnell, C.P.; Tiwari, B.K.; Scannell, A.G.M. Applications of Nonthermal Plasma Technology on Safety and Quality of Dried Food Ingredients. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 130, 325–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Feizollahi, E.; Misra, N.N.; Roopesh, M.S. Factors Influencing the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) Atmospheric Cold Plasma (ACP) in Food Processing Applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 666–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nasiru, M.M.; Frimpong, E.B.; Muhammad, U.; Qian, J.; Mustapha, A.T.; Yan, W.; Zhuang, H.; Zhang, J. Dielectric Barrier Discharge Cold Atmospheric Plasma: Influence of Processing Parameters on Microbial Inactivation in Meat and Meat Products. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 2626–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xie, S.; Pedrow, P.D. A Novel Active Needle Probe in an Atmospheric Pressure Corona-Based Cold Plasma Reactor with Admixtures of Helium and Dry Air. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2020, 48, 2418–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Feklistov, E.G. Measurement Approach for Custom Designed Cold Plasma Generator. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 30, 731–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chang, J.-S.; Lawless, P.A.; Yamamoto, T. Corona Discharge Processes. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 1991, 19, 1152–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khamsen, N.; Akkarachanchainon, A.; Fookiat, K.; Srisala, J.; Chomchuen, S.; Kanokbannakorn, W.; Srisonphan, S. Atmospheric Cold Plasma via Fringe Field Enhanced Corona Discharge on Single Dielectric Barrier for Large-Volume Applications. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016, 86, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  41. Chang, Z.; Yao, C.; Zhang, G. Non-Thermal Equilibrium Atmospheric Pressure Glow-like Discharge Plasma Jet. Plasma Sci. Technol. 2016, 18, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  42. Fan, Z.; Zhong, J.; Li, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, Z.; Bai, S. Inactivation of Escherichia coli Using Atmospheric Pressure Cold Plasma Jet with Thin Quartz Tubes. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2021, 54, 455204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mat Saman, N.; Ahmad, M.H.; Buntat, Z. Experimental Analysis of Cold Plasma with Glow Discharge Mechanism under a Variety of Input Parameters. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2022, 50, 2110–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Huan, Z.; Longjin, J.; Shun, Z.; Guohua, N.I. Review of Research on VOCs Treatment by Gliding Arc Plasma. J. Environ. Eng. Technol. 2024, 14, 425–436. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ananthanarasimhan, J.; Lakshminarayana, R.; Anand, M.S.; Dasappa, S. Influence of Gas Dynamics on Arc Dynamics and the Discharge Power of a Rotating Gliding Arc. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2019, 28, 85012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, S.-Y.; Li, X.-S.; Liu, J.-B.; Liu, J.-L.; Li, H.-P.; Zhu, A.-M. Dimensionless Factors for an Alternating-Current Non-Thermal Arc Plasma. Phys. Plasmas 2016, 23, 120707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xi, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wei, S.; Zhang, D. Cold Plasma Pretreatment Technology for Enhancing the Extraction of Bioactive Ingredients from Plant Materials: A Review. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 209, 117963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sharma, R.; Nath, P.C.; Rustagi, S.; Sharma, M.; Inbaraj, B.S.; Dikkala, P.K.; Nayak, P.K.; Sridhar, K. Cold Plasma—A Sustainable Energy-efficient Low-carbon Food Processing Technology: Physicochemical Characteristics, Microbial Inactivation, and Industrial Applications. Int. J. Food Sci. 2025, 2025, 4166141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Denes, F. Macromolecular Plasma-Chemistry: An Emerging Field of Polymer Science. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004, 29, 815–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bai, F.; Ran, Y.; Zhai, S.; Xia, Y. Cold Atmospheric Plasma: A Promising and Safe Therapeutic Strategy for Atopic Dermatitis. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2023, 184, 1184–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rodrigues, F.E.; Fernandes, F.A.N. Diazinon Degradation in Water Applying Glow Discharge Plasma Technology. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2024, 42, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Saman, N.M.; Ahmad, M.H.; Buntat, Z. Application of Cold Plasma in Nanofillers Surface Modification for Enhancement of Insulation Characteristics of Polymer Nanocomposites: A Review. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 80906–80930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ranjan, R.; Chauhan, A.K.; Gupta, A.K.; Rajesh; Dhanprakash; Singh, S. Investigating the Effect of Combined Radiofrequency Cold Plasma (RF-CP) Treatment on Techno-Functional Attributes of Cashewnut. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2024, 109, 102406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Puligundla, P.; Mok, C. Microwave- and Radio-Frequency-Powered Cold Plasma Applications for Food Safety and Preservation. In Advances in Cold Plasma Applications for Food Safety and Preservation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 309–329. ISBN 978-0-12-814921-8. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ionita, M.D.; Teodorescu, M.; Acsente, T.; Bazavan, M.; Ionita, E.R.; Dinescu, G. Remote Surface Modification of Polymeric Foils by Expanding Atmospheric Pressure Radiofrequency Discharges. Rom. J. Phys. 2011, 56, 132–138. [Google Scholar]
  56. Despax, B.; Pascal, O.; Gherardi, N.; Naude, N.; Belinger, A.; Pitchford, L.C. Influence of Electromagnetic Radiation on the Power Balance in a Radiofrequency Microdischarge with a Hollow Needle Electrode. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 144104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shapira, Y.; Chaniel, G.; Bormashenko, E. Surface Charging by the Cold Plasma Discharge of Lentil and Pepper Seeds in Comparison with Polymers. Colloids Surf. B 2018, 172, 541–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Weihe, T. Microwave Plasmas in Food Safety. A Review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 96, 103774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hong, L.; Chen, Z.; Yang, J.; Cheng, T.; Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, B.; Lu, X. Ionization Process and Distinctive Characteristic of Atmospheric Pressure Cold Plasma Jet Driven Resonantly by Microwave Pulses. Plasma Sci. Technol. 2022, 24, 105401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, M.; Shi, T.; Wang, X.; Bao, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Monto, A.R.; Jin, W.; Yuan, L.; Gao, R. Plasma-Activated Water Promoted the Aggregation of Aristichthys Nobilis Myofibrillar Protein and the Effects on Gelation Properties. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2022, 5, 1616–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, M.; Wang, X.; Shi, T.; Xiong, Z.; Jin, W.; Bao, Y.; Monto, A.R.; Yuan, L.; Gao, R. Mechanism of Plasma-Activated Water Promoting the Heat-Induced Aggregation of Myofibrillar Protein from Silver Carp (Aristichthys nobilis). Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 91, 103555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sarangapani, C.; Scally, L.; Gulan, M.; Cullen, P.J. Dissipation of Pesticide Residues on Grapes and Strawberries Using Plasma-Activated Water. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2020, 13, 1728–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Xiang, Q.; Fan, L.; Li, Y.; Dong, S.; Li, K.; Bai, Y. A Review on Recent Advances in Plasma-Activated Water for Food Safety: Current Applications and Future Trends. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 2250–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wong, K.S.; Chew, N.S.L.; Low, M.; Tan, M.K. Plasma-Activated Water: Physicochemical Properties, Generation Techniques, and Applications. Processes 2023, 11, 2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zou, X.; Xu, M.; Pan, S.; Gan, L.; Zhang, S.; Chen, H.; Liu, D.; Lu, X.; Ostrikov, K.K. Plasma Activated Oil: Fast Production, Reactivity, Stability, and Wound Healing Application. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 1611–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cui, H.; Ma, C.; Lin, L. Synergetic Antibacterial Efficacy of Cold Nitrogen Plasma and Clove Oil against Escherichia coli O157:H7 Biofilms on Lettuce. Food Control 2016, 66, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhu, Y.; Li, C.; Cui, H.; Lin, L. Plasma Enhanced-Nutmeg Essential Oil Solid Liposome Treatment on the Gelling and Storage Properties of Pork Meat Batters. J. Food Eng. 2020, 266, 109696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cui, H.; Li, W.; Li, C.; Lin, L. Synergistic Effect between Helichrysum italicum Essential Oil and Cold Nitrogen Plasma against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms on Different Food-contact Surfaces. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 2493–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lin, L.; Liao, X.; Cui, H. Cold Plasma Treated Thyme Essential Oil/Silk Fibroin Nanofibers against Salmonella Typhimurium in Poultry Meat. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 21, 100337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lin, L.; Liao, X.; Li, C.; Abdel-Samie, M.A.; Cui, H. Inhibitory Effect of Cold Nitrogen Plasma on Salmonella Typhimurium Biofilm and Its Application on Poultry Egg Preservation. LWT 2020, 126, 109340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Punia Bangar, S.; Suri, S.; Nayi, P.; Phimolsiripol, Y. Cold Plasma for Microbial Safety: Principle, Mechanism, and Factors Responsible. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e16850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Cui, H.; Wu, J.; Li, C.; Lin, L. Promoting Anti-listeria Activity of Lemongrass Oil on Pork Loin by Cold Nitrogen Plasma Assist. J. Food Saf. 2017, 37, e12316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Xu, H.; Dai, C.; Tang, Y.; Xu, X.; Umego, E.C.; He, R.; Ma, H. The Selective Breeding and Mutagenesis Mechanism of High-yielding Surfactin Strains with Atmospheric and Room Temperature Plasma. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 1851–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wei, W.; Yang, S.; Yang, F.; Hu, X.; Wang, Y.; Guo, W.; Yang, B.; Xiao, X.; Zhu, L. Cold Plasma Controls Nitrite Hazards by Modulating Microbial Communities in Pickled Radish. Foods 2023, 12, 2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Özdemir, E.; Başaran, P.; Kartal, S.; Akan, T. Cold Plasma Application to Fresh Green Leafy Vegetables: Impact on Microbiology and Product Quality. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 4484–4515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Cui, H.; Ma, C.; Li, C.; Lin, L. Enhancing the Antibacterial Activity of Thyme Oil against Salmonella on Eggshell by Plasma-Assisted Process. Food Control 2016, 70, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Mravlje, J.; Regvar, M.; Vogel-Mikuš, K. Development of Cold Plasma Technologies for Surface Decontamination of Seed Fungal Pathogens: Present Status and Perspectives. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ahangari, M.; Ramezan, Y.; Khani, M.R. Effect of Low Pressure Cold Plasma Treatment on Microbial Decontamination and Physicochemical Properties of Dried Walnut Kernels. J. Food Process Eng. 2021, 44, e13593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bang, I.H.; Kim, Y.E.; Lee, S.Y.; Min, S.C. Microbial Decontamination of Black Peppercorns by Simultaneous Treatment with Cold Plasma and Ultraviolet C. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 63, 102392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Amini, M.; Rasouli, M.; Ghoranneviss, M.; Momeni, M.; Ostrikov, K.K. Synergistic Cellulose-Based Nanocomposite Packaging and Cold Plasma Decontamination for Extended Saffron Preservation. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 18275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Baggio, A.; Marino, M.; Innocente, N.; Celotto, M.; Maifreni, M. Antimicrobial Effect of Oxidative Technologies in Food Processing: An Overview. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2020, 246, 669–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Charoux, C.M.G.; Free, L.; Hinds, L.M.; Vijayaraghavan, R.K.; Daniels, S.; O’Donnell, C.P.; Tiwari, B.K. Effect of Non-Thermal Plasma Technology on Microbial Inactivation and Total Phenolic Content of a Model Liquid Food System and Black Pepper Grains. LWT 2020, 118, 108716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wiktor, A.; Hrycak, B.; Jasiński, M.; Rybak, K.; Kieliszek, M.; Kraśniewska, K.; Witrowa-Rajchert, D. Impact of Atmospheric Pressure Microwave Plasma Treatment on Quality of Selected Spices. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, D.; Deng, J.; Cui, X.; Ma, Z.; Dai, R.; et al. A Systematic Investigation of Direct and Indirect-Cold Atmospheric Plasma Treatment on Bacillus Cereus and the Application in Black Pepper. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 92, 103583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kahar, S.P.; Shelar, A.; Annapure, U.S. Effect of Pin-to-Plate Atmospheric Cold Plasma (ACP) on Microbial Load and Physicochemical Properties in Cinnamon, Black Pepper, and Fennel. Food Res. Int. 2024, 177, 113920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Guo, Y.; Xia, S.; Shi, C.; Ma, N.; Pei, F.; Yang, W.; Hu, Q.; Kimatu, B.M.; Fang, D. The Effect of Cold Plasma Treatment on the Storage Stability of Mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus). Foods 2024, 13, 3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Craighead, S.; Hertrich, S.; Boyd, G.; Sites, J.; Niemira, B.A.; Kniel, K.E. Cold Atmospheric Plasma Jet Inactivates Cryptosporidium Parvum Oocysts on Cilantro. J. Food Prot. 2020, 83, 794–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Medvecká, V.; Mošovská, S.; Mikulajová, A.; Valík, Ľ.; Zahoranová, A. Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Decontamination of Allspice Berries and Effect on Qualitative Characteristics. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2020, 246, 2215–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Song, Y.; Fan, X. Cold Plasma Enhances the Efficacy of Aerosolized Hydrogen Peroxide in Reducing Populations of Salmonella Typhimurium and Listeria Innocua on Grape Tomatoes, Apples, Cantaloupe and Romaine Lettuce. Food Microbiol. 2020, 87, 103391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Than, H.A.Q.; Nguyen, T.T.; Do, N.K.; Tran, M.A.N.; Pham, T.H. Inactivation of Diutina Catenulata Isolated from Longan Fruit Using Atmospheric Pressure Cold Plasma DBD in Argon, Air, and Argon-Air Mixture. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2025, 18, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hemmati, V.; Garavand, F.; Goudarzi, M.; Sarlak, Z.; Cacciotti, I.; Tiwari, B.K. Cold Atmospheric-pressure Plasma Treatment of Turmeric Powder: Microbial Load, Essential Oil Profile, Bioactivity and Microstructure Analyses. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 2224–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Birjandi Toroghi, Z.; Niazmand, R.; Moradinezhad, F.; Bayat, H. Potential of Cold Plasma Pretreatment for Preserving Biochemical Attributes and Ensuring the Microbiological Safety of Saffron Stigma. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 7417–7427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Darvish, H.; Ramezan, Y.; Khani, M.R.; Kamkari, A. Effect of Low-pressure Cold Plasma Processing on Decontamination and Quality Attributes of Saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 10, 2082–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. De Morais, J.S.; Cabral, L.; Fonteles, T.V.; Silva, F.A.; Sant’Ana, A.S.; Dos Santos Lima, M.; Rodrigues, S.; Fernandes, F.A.N.; Magnani, M. Effects of Different Cold Plasma Treatments on Chemical Composition, Phenolics Bioaccessibility and Microbiota of Edible Red Mini-Roses. Food Chem. 2024, 460, 140522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Agun, L.; Ahmad, N.; Redzuan, N.; Idirs, N.A.S.; Taib, S.M.; Zakaria, Z.; Raja Ibrahim, R.K. Sterilization of Oyster Mushroom Crop Residue Substrate by Using Cold Plasma Technology. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 39, 903–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mitra, S.; Veerana, M.; Choi, E.-H.; Park, G. Effects of Pre-Treatment Using Plasma on the Antibacterial Activity of Mushroom Surfaces. Foods 2021, 10, 1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gavahian, M.; Sheu, F.; Tsai, M.; Chu, Y. The Effects of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Gas and Plasma-activated Water on Texture, Color, and Bacterial Characteristics of Shiitake Mushroom. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2019, 44, e14316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mishra, R.; Mishra, A.; Jangra, S.; Pandey, S.; Chhabra, M.; Prakash, R. Process Parameters Optimization for Red Globe Grapes to Enhance Shelf-Life Using Non-Equilibrium Cold Plasma Jet. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2024, 210, 112778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wei, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J. Fungicidal Efficiency of DBD Cold Plasma against Aspergillus Niger on Dried Jujube. Food Microbiol. 2024, 121, 104523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lotfy, K.; Al-Qahtani, S.M.; Al-Harbi, N.A.; El-Absy, K.M.; Bu Shulaybi, F.A.; Alali, S.A.; Mashtoly, T.A. Influence of Non-Thermal Plasma on the Quality and Nutritional Content of Palm Dates. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 8587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kirk-Bradley, N.T.; Salau, T.G.; Salzman, K.Z.; Moore, J.M. Atmospheric Cold Plasma (ACP) Treatment for Efficient Disinfestation of the Cowpea Weevil, Callosobruchus Maculatus. J. ASABE 2023, 66, 921–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Shabani, H.; Dezhpour, A.; Jafari, S.; Moghaddam, M.J.M.; Nilkar, M. Antimicrobial Activity of Cold Atmospheric-Pressure Argon Plasma Combined with Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) Extract against P. aeruginosa and E. coli Biofilms. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 9441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Hemmati, V.; Garavand, F.; Khorshidian, N.; Cacciotti, I.; Goudarzi, M.; Chaichi, M.; Tiwari, B.K. Impact of Cold Atmospheric Plasma on Microbial Safety, Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Contents, Antioxidant Activity, Volatile Compounds, Surface Morphology, and Sensory Quality of Green Tea Powder. Food Biosci. 2021, 44, 101348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Shirani, K.; Shahidi, F.; Mortazavi, S.A. Investigation of Decontamination Effect of Argon Cold Plasma on Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of Almond Slices. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 335, 108892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Menglu, H.; Can, Z.; Peiyao, C.; Yinxin, L.; Cui, S.; Shuhao, H.; Lingxia, H. Killing Effect of Cold Atmospheric Plasma on Escherichia coli from Post-Harvest Mulberry Fruit. Sci. Seric. 2023, 49, 82–90. [Google Scholar]
  106. Han, J.-Y.; Song, W.-J.; Eom, S.; Kim, S.B.; Kang, D.-H. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Cold Plasma Treatment against Food-Borne Pathogens on Various Foods. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 204003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zhou, C.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, H.; Li, B.; Yang, W.; Zhai, X.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; et al. Air and Argon Cold Plasma Effects on Lipolytic Enzymes Inactivation, Physicochemical Properties and Volatile Profiles of Lightly-Milled Rice. Food Chem. 2024, 445, 138699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Shen, C.; Chen, W.; Li, C.; Cui, H.; Lin, L. The Effects of Cold Plasma (CP) Treatment on the Inactivation of Yam Peroxidase and Characteristics of Yam Slices. J. Food Eng. 2023, 359, 111693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wang, Y.; Ye, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Cheng, J.-H. Effects of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Cold Plasma on the Activity, Structure and Conformation of Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) and on the Activity of Litchi Peroxidase (POD). LWT 2021, 141, 111078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jia, S.; Zhang, N.; Ji, H.; Zhang, X.; Dong, C.; Yu, J.; Yan, S.; Chen, C.; Liang, L. Effects of Atmospheric Cold Plasma Treatment on the Storage Quality and Chlorophyll Metabolism of Postharvest Tomato. Foods 2022, 11, 4088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jia, S.; Zhang, N.; Dong, C.; Zheng, P.; Ji, H.; Yu, J.; Yan, S.; Chen, C.; Liang, L. Effect of Cold Plasma Treatment on the Softening of Winter Jujubes (Ziziphus jujuba Mill. cv. Dongzao). Horticulturae 2023, 9, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Du, Y.; Yang, F.; Yu, H.; Xie, Y.; Yao, W. Improving Food Drying Performance by Cold Plasma Pretreatment: A Systematic Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 4402–4421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Mayookha, V.P.; Pandiselvam, R.; Kothakota, A.; Padma Ishwarya, S.; Chandra Khanashyam, A.; Kutlu, N.; Rifna, E.J.; Kumar, M.; Panesar, P.S.; Abd El-Maksoud, A.A. Ozone and Cold Plasma: Emerging Oxidation Technologies for Inactivation of Enzymes in Fruits, Vegetables, and Fruit Juices. Food Control 2023, 144, 109399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Misra, N.N.; Pankaj, S.K.; Segat, A.; Ishikawa, K. Cold Plasma Interactions with Enzymes in Foods and Model Systems. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 55, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Han, Y.; Cheng, J.-H.; Sun, D.-W. Activities and Conformation Changes of Food Enzymes Induced by Cold Plasma: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 794–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Bonah, E.; Huang, X.; Aheto, J.H.; Osae, R. Application of Electronic Nose as a Non-Invasive Technique for Odor Fingerprinting and Detection of Bacterial Foodborne Pathogens: A Review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 1977–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wang, B.; Mahoney, N.E.; Pan, Z.; Khir, R.; Wu, B.; Ma, H.; Zhao, L. Effectiveness of Pulsed Light Treatment for Degradation and Detoxification of Aflatoxin B1 and B2 in Rough Rice and Rice Bran. Food Control 2016, 59, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Godana, E.A.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, L.; Wang, K.; Dhanasekaran, S.; Mehari, T.G.; Zhang, H. Biotechnological and Biocontrol Approaches for Mitigating Postharvest Diseases Caused by Fungal Pathogens and Their Mycotoxins in Fruits: A Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 17584–17596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Tang, C.; He, Y.; Yuan, B.; Li, L.; Luo, L.; You, T. Simultaneous Detection of Multiple Mycotoxins in Agricultural Products: Recent Advances in Optical and Electrochemical Sensing Methods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2024, 23, e70062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Marimuthu, M.; Xu, K.; Song, W.; Chen, Q.; Wen, H. Safeguarding Food Safety: Nanomaterials-Based Fluorescent Sensors for Pesticide Tracing. Food Chem. 2025, 463, 141288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Liu, M.; Feng, J.; Yang, X.; Yu, B.; Zhuang, J.; Xu, H.; Xiang, Q.; Ma, R.; Jiao, Z. Recent Advances in the Degradation Efficacy and Mechanisms of Mycotoxins in Food by Atmospheric Cold Plasma. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 270, 115944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Misra, N.N.; Yadav, B.; Roopesh, M.S.; Jo, C. Cold Plasma for Effective Fungal and Mycotoxin Control in Foods: Mechanisms, Inactivation Effects, and Applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 106–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Zhang, M.; Ye, Z.; Xing, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, J.; Yan, W. Degradation of Deoxynivalenol in Wheat by Double Dielectric Barrier Discharge Cold Plasma: Identification and Pathway of Degradation Products. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2023, 103, 2347–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Nwabor, O.F.; Onyeaka, H.; Miri, T.; Obileke, K.; Anumudu, C.; Hart, A. A Cold Plasma Technology for Ensuring the Microbiological Safety and Quality of Foods. Food Eng. Rev. 2022, 14, 535–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Akhavan-Mahdavi, S.; Mirzazadeh, M.; Alam, Z.; Solaimanimehr, S. The Effect of Chitosan Coating Combined with Cold Plasma on the Quality and Safety of Pistachio during Storage. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 4296–4307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Esmaeili, Z.; Hosseinzadeh Samani, B.; Nazari, F.; Rostami, S.; Nemati, A. The Green Technology of Cold Plasma Jet on the Inactivation of Aspergillus flavus and the Total Aflatoxin Level in Pistachio and Its Quality Properties. J. Food Process Eng. 2023, 46, e14189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Shi, H.; Ileleji, K.; Stroshine, R.L.; Keener, K.; Jensen, J.L. Reduction of Aflatoxin in Corn by High Voltage Atmospheric Cold Plasma. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 1042–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Liu, Y.; Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Bian, K. Structures of Reaction Products and Degradation Pathways of Aflatoxin B1 by Ultrasound Treatment. Toxins 2019, 11, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zeraatpisheh, F.; Mosallaie, F.; Sanaei, F.; Falah, F.; Vasiee, A.; Yazdi, F.T. The Simultaneous Influence of Ultraviolet Rays and Cold Plasma on the Physicochemical Attributes and Shelf Life of Dried Pistachios during the Storage Period. J. Food Process Eng. 2023, 46, e14403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Hojnik, N.; Modic, M.; Žigon, D.; Kovač, J.; Jurov, A.; Dickenson, A.; Walsh, J.L.; Cvelbar, U. Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma-assisted Removal of Aflatoxin B1 from Contaminated Corn Kernels. Plasma Process. Polym. 2021, 18, 2000163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Topolovec, B.; Škoro, N.; Puač, N.; Petrovic, M. Pathways of Organic Micropollutants Degradation in Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Processing—A Review. Chemosphere 2022, 294, 133606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Gao, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, W.; Jiang, W.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Residue Behaviors of Six Pesticides during Apple Juice Production and Storage. Food Res. Int. 2024, 177, 113894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Liang, Y.; Duan, J.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, Z. Degradation of Pesticides in Wheat Flour during Noodle Production and Storage. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2022, 39, 1239–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Xu, Y.; Hassan, M.M.; Ali, S.; Li, H.; Ouyang, Q.; Chen, Q. Self-Cleaning-Mediated SERS Chip Coupled Chemometric Algorithms for Detection and Photocatalytic Degradation of Pesticides in Food. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 1667–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Azam, S.M.R.; Ma, H.; Xu, B.; Devi, S.; Stanley, S.L.; Siddique, M.A.B.; Mujumdar, A.S.; Zhu, J. Multi-Frequency Multi-Mode Ultrasound Treatment for Removing Pesticides from Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) and Effects on Product Quality. LWT 2021, 143, 111147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Munir, S.; Azeem, A.; Sikandar Zaman, M.; Zia Ul Haq, M. From Field to Table: Ensuring Food Safety by Reducing Pesticide Residues in Food. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 922, 171382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Pandiselvam, R.; Kaavya, R.; Khanashyam, A.C.; Divya, V.; Abdullah, S.K.; Aurum, F.S.; Dakshyani, R.; Kothakota, A.; Ramesh, S.V.; Mousavi Khaneghah, A. Research Trends and Emerging Physical Processing Technologies in Mitigation of Pesticide Residues on Various Food Products. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 45131–45149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Gavahian, M.; Sarangapani, C.; Misra, N.N. Cold Plasma for Mitigating Agrochemical and Pesticide Residue in Food and Water: Similarities with Ozone and Ultraviolet Technologies. Food Res. Int. 2021, 141, 110138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sreelakshmi, V.P.; Vendan, S.E.; Negi, P.S. Cold Plasma Treatment for Decontamination of Pesticide Residues and Preservation of Spinach Leaves. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2025, 220, 113322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Anbarasan, R.; Jaspin, S.; Bhavadharini, B.; Pare, A.; Pandiselvam, R.; Mahendran, R. Chlorpyrifos Pesticide Reduction in Soybean Using Cold Plasma and Ozone Treatments. LWT 2022, 159, 113193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sarangapani, C.; O’Toole, G.; Cullen, P.J.; Bourke, P. Atmospheric Cold Plasma Dissipation Efficiency of Agrochemicals on Blueberries. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2017, 44, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Cong, L.; Huang, M.; Zhang, J.; Yan, W. Effect of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma on the Degradation of Malathion and Chlorpyrifos on Lettuce. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 424–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Liu, H.; Guo, D.; Feng, X. Plasma Degradation of Pesticides on the Surface of Corn and Evaluation of Its Quality Changes. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zong, Z.; Zhou, R.; Liu, D.; Song, Y.; Niu, J. Treatment of Omethoate on Edible Wolfberry by Atmospheric Pressure Air Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge. Plasma Process. Polym. 2016, 13, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zhou, R.; Zhou, R.; Yu, F.; Xi, D.; Wang, P.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Bazaka, K.; Ostrikov, K. Removal of Organophosphorus Pesticide Residues from Lycium Barbarum by Gas Phase Surface Discharge Plasma. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 342, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Ali, M.; Sun, D.-W.; Cheng, J.-H.; Johnson Esua, O. Effects of Combined Treatment of Plasma Activated Liquid and Ultrasound for Degradation of Chlorothalonil Fungicide Residues in Tomato. Food Chem. 2022, 371, 131162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Ali, M.; Cheng, J.-H.; Sun, D.-W. Effect of Plasma Activated Water and Buffer Solution on Fungicide Degradation from Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Fruit. Food Chem. 2021, 350, 129195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zhang, J.; Wen, C.; Zhang, H.; Duan, Y.; Ma, H. Recent Advances in the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds with Subcritical Water: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 95, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Gil-Martín, E.; Forbes-Hernández, T.; Romero, A.; Cianciosi, D.; Giampieri, F.; Battino, M. Influence of the Extraction Method on the Recovery of Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from Food Industry By-Products. Food Chem. 2022, 378, 131918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Ashraf, W.; Rehman, A.; Hussain, A.; Karim, A.; Sharif, H.R.; Siddiquy, M.; Lianfu, Z. Optimization of Extraction Process and Estimation of Flavonoids from Fenugreek Using Green Extracting Deep Eutectic Solvents Coupled with Ultrasonication. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2024, 17, 887–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Tchabo, W.; Ma, Y.; Kwaw, E.; Xiao, L.; Wu, M.; Apaliya, M.T. Impact of Extraction Parameters and Their Optimization on the Nutraceuticals and Antioxidant Properties of Aqueous Extract Mulberry Leaf. Int. J. Food Prop. 2018, 21, 717–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Safdar, B.; Pang, Z.; Liu, X.; Jatoi, M.A.; Mehmood, A.; Rashid, M.T.; Ali, N.; Naveed, M. Flaxseed Gum: Extraction, Bioactive Composition, Structural Characterization, and Its Potential Antioxidant Activity. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, e13014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ding, Q.; Jiang, H.; Chen, Y.; Luo, L.; He, R.; Ma, H.; Wu-Chen, R.A.; Zhang, T. Influence of Nitrogen Protection on the Extraction Yield and Antioxidant Activities of Polyphenols by Ultrasonic-assisted Extraction from Rapeseed Meal. J. Food Process Eng. 2019, 42, e13104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Chen, X.; Ding, J.; Ji, D.; He, S.; Ma, H. Optimization of Ultrasonic-assisted Extraction Conditions for Bioactive Components from Coffee Leaves Using the Taguchi Design and Response Surface Methodology. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 1742–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Akpabli-Tsigbe, N.D.K.; Ma, Y.; Ekumah, J.; Osabutey, J.; Hu, J.; Xu, M.; Johnson, N.A.N.; Mintah, B.K. Ultrasonic-assisted Extraction of Bioactive Chlorogenic Acid from Heilong48 Soybean Variety: Parametric Optimization and Evaluation of Physicochemical and Bioactive Properties. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 10, 985–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Dzah, C.S.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wen, C.; Zhang, J.; Chen, G.; Ma, H. The Effects of Ultrasound Assisted Extraction on Yield, Antioxidant, Anticancer and Antimicrobial Activity of Polyphenol Extracts: A Review. Food Biosci. 2020, 35, 100547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Rezaei, S.; Ghobadian, B.; Ebadi, M.; Ghomi, H. Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Extracted Oil from Camelina Sativa Seed Treated by Discharge Cold Plasma. Contrib. Plasma Phys. 2020, 60, e202000032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Zhou, Y.; Li, J.; Li, Z.; Ma, Q.; Wang, L. Extraction of Anthocyanins from Haskap Using Cold Plasma-assisted Enzyme. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2023, 103, 2186–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Elmizadeh, A.; Goli, S.A.H.; Rahimmalek, M. Application of Cold Plasma Pretreatment to Improve the Extraction Efficiency of Tanshinone Compounds from Salvia Subg. Perovskia Root. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 204, 117337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Li, X.; Zhang, Z.; Qi, X.; Li, L.; Zhu, J.; Brennan, C.S.; Yan, J. Application of Nonthermal Processing Technologies in Extracting and Modifying Polysaccharides: A Critical Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 4367–4389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Jangi, F.; Ebadi, M.-T.; Ayyari, M. Qualitative Changes in Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis L.) as Affected by Cold Plasma, Packaging Method and Storage Duration. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2021, 22, 100289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Moradi-Sadr, J.; Ebadi, M.; Ayyari, M.; Ghomi, H. Optimization of Ultrasonic Bath and Cold Plasma Pre-treatments in the Spearmint Essential Oil Isolation Process. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 1904–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Shokoohi, F.; Ebadi, M.; Ghomi, H.; Rezaeinezhad, A.R.; Faghih Haghani, S. Increasing the Efficiency of Cumin Essential Oil Extraction Using Cold Plasma Pretreatments. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2024, 104, 5001–5009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Alashti Fatemeh, J.; Sohbatzadeh, F.; Ahmadian, S.; Kenari, R.E.; Nazifi, E. Impact of Atmospheric Cold Plasma Pretreatment on Morphology, Structure, and Chemical Properties of Clove (Syzygium aromaticum). LWT 2024, 191, 115639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Kim, H.-J.; Bae, J.H.; Lee, S.; Kim, J.; Jung, S.; Jo, C.; Lee, J.Y.; Seo, J.H.; Park, S. Structural and Functional Changes in Soybean Protein via Remote Plasma Treatments. Molecules 2023, 28, 3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Rashid, F.; Bao, Y.; Ahmed, Z.; Huang, J.-Y. Effect of High Voltage Atmospheric Cold Plasma on Extraction of Fenugreek Galactomannan and Its Physicochemical Properties. Food Res. Int. 2020, 138, 109776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Lu, B.-J.; Lin, T.-C.; Chao, H.-R.; Tsai, C.-H.; Lu, J.-H.; Tsai, M.-H.; Chang, C.-T.; Hsieh, H.; Lu, I.-C.; Arcega, R.D.; et al. The Impact of Air or Nitrogen Non-Thermal Plasma on Variations of Natural Bioactive Compounds in Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum Koidz.) Seed and the Potential Effects for Human Health. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Feng, Y.; Xu, B.; ElGasim, A.; Yagoub, A.; Ma, H.; Sun, Y.; Xu, X.; Yu, X.; Zhou, C. Role of Drying Techniques on Physical, Rehydration, Flavor, Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Characteristics of Garlic. Food Chem. 2021, 343, 128404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Ren, Z.; Yu, X.; Yagoub, A.E.A.; Fakayode, O.A.; Ma, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, C. Combinative Effect of Cutting Orientation and Drying Techniques (Hot Air, Vacuum, Freeze and Catalytic Infrared Drying) on the Physicochemical Properties of Ginger (Zingiber Officinale Roscoe). LWT 2021, 144, 111238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zhang, J.; Yagoub, A.E.A.; Sun, Y.; Arun, M.S.; Ma, H.; Zhou, C. Role of Thermal and Non-thermal Drying Techniques on Drying Kinetics and the Physicochemical Properties of Shiitake Mushroom. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Amanor-Atiemoh, R.; Zhou, C.; Mujumdar, A.; Osae, R.; Taiye Mustapha, A.; Wahia, H.; Sampson, G.; Amoa-Owusu, A.; Ma, H. Effect of Simultaneous Dual-frequency Ultrasound Aided Ethanolic Pretreatment on Drying Kinetics, Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant Activity, and Physicochemical Properties of Apple Slices Using Pulsed Vacuum Dryer. J. Food Process Eng. 2020, 43, e13535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. An, N.; Sun, W.; Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Shang, N.; Lv, W.; Li, D.; Wang, L. Effect of Different Drying Techniques on Drying Kinetics, Nutritional Components, Antioxidant Capacity, Physical Properties and Microstructure of Edamame. Food Chem. 2022, 373, 131412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Xu, B.; Sylvain Tiliwa, E.; Yan, W.; Roknul Azam, S.M.; Wei, B.; Zhou, C.; Ma, H.; Bhandari, B. Recent Development in High Quality Drying of Fruits and Vegetables Assisted by Ultrasound: A Review. Food Res. Int. 2022, 152, 110744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Xu, B.; Feng, M.; Chitrakar, B.; Wei, B.; Wang, B.; Zhou, C.; Ma, H.; Wang, B.; Chang, L.; Ren, G.; et al. Selection of Drying Techniques for Pingyin Rose on the Basis of Physicochemical Properties and Volatile Compounds Retention. Food Chem. 2022, 385, 132539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Bhattacharjee, S.; Mohanty, P.; Sahu, J.K.; Sahu, J.N. A Critical Review on Drying of Food Materials: Recent Progress and Key Challenges. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2024, 158, 107863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Chobot, M.; Kozłowska, M.; Ignaczak, A.; Kowalska, H. Development of Drying and Roasting Processes for the Production of Plant-Based pro-Healthy Snacks in the Light of Nutritional Trends and Sustainable Techniques. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 149, 104553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Shen, C.; Chen, W.; Aziz, T.; Khojah, E.; Al-Asmari, F.; Alamri, A.S.; Alhomrani, M.; Cui, H.; Lin, L. Drying Kinetics and Moisture Migration Mechanism of Yam Slices by Cold Plasma Pretreatment Combined with Far-Infrared Drying. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 95, 103730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Bai, J.-W.; Li, D.-D.; Abulaiti, R.; Wang, M.; Wu, X.; Feng, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Cai, J. Cold Plasma as a Novel Pretreatment to Improve the Drying Kinetics and Quality of Green Peas. Foods 2025, 14, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Xu, B.; Wei, B.; Ren, X.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Zhou, C.; Ma, H.; Chalamaiah, M.; Liang, Q.; Wang, Z. Dielectric Pretreatment of Rapeseed 1: Influence on the Drying Characteristics of the Seeds and Physico-Chemical Properties of Cold-Pressed Oil. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2018, 11, 1236–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Kamkari, A.; Dadashi, S.; Heshmati, M.K.; Dehghannya, J.; Ramezan, Y. The Effect of Cold Plasma Pretreatment on Drying Efficiency of Beetroot by Intermittent Microwave-Hot Air (IMHA) Hybrid Dryer Method: Assessing Drying Kinetic, Physical Properties, and Microstructure of the Product. LWT 2024, 212, 117010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Zhou, Y.-H.; Vidyarthi, S.K.; Zhong, C.-S.; Zheng, Z.-A.; An, Y.; Wang, J.; Wei, Q.; Xiao, H.-W. Cold Plasma Enhances Drying and Color, Rehydration Ratio and Polyphenols of Wolfberry via Microstructure and Ultrastructure Alteration. LWT 2020, 134, 110173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Namjoo, M.; Moradi, M.; Dibagar, N.; Niakousari, M. Cold Plasma Pretreatment Prior to Ultrasound-Assisted Air Drying of Cumin Seeds. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2022, 15, 2065–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Karim, N.; Shishir, M.R.I.; Bao, T.; Chen, W. Effect of Cold Plasma Pretreated Hot-air Drying on the Physicochemical Characteristics, Nutritional Values and Antioxidant Activity of Shiitake Mushroom. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 6271–6280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Miraei Ashtiani, S.-H.; Rafiee, M.; Mohebi Morad, M.; Khojastehpour, M.; Khani, M.R.; Rohani, A.; Shokri, B.; Martynenko, A. Impact of Gliding Arc Plasma Pretreatment on Drying Efficiency and Physicochemical Properties of Grape. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 63, 102381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Obajemihi, O.I.; Cheng, J.-H.; Sun, D.-W. Novel Cold Plasma Functionalized Water Pretreatment for Improving Drying Performance and Physicochemical Properties of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Fruits during Infrared-Accelerated Pulsed Vacuum Drying. J. Food Eng. 2024, 379, 112050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Wu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Li, Y.; Li, M. Effect of High-Voltage Electrostatic Field on Inorganic Nitrogen Uptake by Cucumber Plants. Trans. ASABE 2016, 59, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Wu, X.; Wu, C.; Bian, Z.; Ye, Z.; Meng, L.; Xia, L.; Bao, E.; Cao, K. Abscisic Acid and Reactive Oxygen Species Were Involved in Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water-Promoted Seed Germination in Watermelon. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 291, 110581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Azeem, A.; Javed, Q.; Sun, J.; Ullah, I.; Buttar, N.A.; Saifullah, M.; Du, D. Effect of Salt Stress on Seed Germination and Seedling Vigour in Okra. Indian J. Hortic. 2020, 77, 513–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Adhikari, B.; Adhikari, M.; Park, G. The Effects of Plasma on Plant Growth, Development, and Sustainability. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Rao, W.; Li, Y.; Dhaliwal, H.; Feng, M.; Xiang, Q.; Roopesh, M.S.; Pan, D.; Du, L. The Application of Cold Plasma Technology in Low-Moisture Foods. Food Eng. Rev. 2023, 15, 86–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Namjoo, M.; Moradi, M.; Dibagar, N.; Taghvaei, M.; Niakousari, M. Effect of Green Technologies of Cold Plasma and Airborne Ultrasound Wave on the Germination and Growth Indices of Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) Seeds. J. Food Process Eng. 2022, 45, e14166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Benabderrahim, M.A.; Bettaieb, I.; Hannachi, H.; Rejili, M.; Dufour, T. Cold Plasma Treatment Boosts Barley Germination and Seedling Vigor: Insights into Soluble Sugar, Starch, and Protein Modifications. J. Cereal Sci. 2024, 116, 103852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Ghodsimaab, S.P.; Makarian, H.; Ghasimi Hagh, Z.; Gholipoor, M. Scanning Electron Microscopy, Biochemical and Enzymatic Studies to Evaluate Hydro-Priming and Cold Plasma Treatment Effects on the Germination of Salvia Leriifolia Benth. Seeds. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1035296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Ren, P.; Lyu, X.; Shi, L. Effects of Atmospheric Pressure Cold Plasma Continuous and Interval Treatments on Oat Seed Germination. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2023, 25, 215–221. [Google Scholar]
  195. Darmanin, M.; Fröhling, A.; Bußler, S.; Durek, J.; Neugart, S.; Schreiner, M.; Blundell, R.; Gatt, R.; Schlüter, O.; Valdramidis, V.P. Aqueous and Gaseous Plasma Applications for the Treatment of Mung Bean Seeds. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Su, L.; Lan, Q.; Pritchard, H.W.; Xue, H.; Wang, X. Reactive Oxygen Species Induced by Cold Stratification Promote Germination of Hedysarum Scoparium Seeds. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 109, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Rahman, M.M.; Sajib, S.A.; Rahi, M.S.; Tahura, S.; Roy, N.C.; Parvez, S.; Reza, M.A.; Talukder, M.R.; Kabir, A.H. Mechanisms and Signaling Associated with LPDBD Plasma Mediated Growth Improvement in Wheat. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Mildažienė, V.; Aleknavičiūtė, V.; Žūkienė, R.; Paužaitė, G.; Naučienė, Z.; Filatova, I.; Lyushkevich, V.; Haimi, P.; Tamošiūnė, I.; Baniulis, D. Treatment of Common Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) Seeds with Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field and Cold Plasma Induces Changes in Seed Phytohormone Balance, Seedling Development and Leaf Protein Expression. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Perera, K.Y.; Prendeville, J.; Jaiswal, A.K.; Jaiswal, S. Cold Plasma Technology in Food Packaging. Coatings 2022, 12, 1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Bhat, A.A.; Ayub, A.; Wani, A.K. Bioactive Compounds in Active Food Packaging (ACP): Health and Safety Considerations. In Green Materials for Active Food Packaging; Islam, S.u., Shahid, M., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2025; pp. 335–357. ISBN 978-981-96-0369-5. [Google Scholar]
  201. Kaur, S.; Kumar, Y.; Singh, V.; Kaur, J.; Panesar, P.S. Cold Plasma Technology: Reshaping Food Preservation and Safety. Food Control 2024, 163, 110537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, H.; Luo, S.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, H.; Li, P. Effects of In-package Atmospheric Cold Plasma Treatment on the Qualitative, Metabolic and Microbial Stability of Fresh-cut Pears. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 4473–4480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Yang, X.; Ma, L.; Zheng, J.; Qiao, Y.; Bai, J.; Cai, J. Effects of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment on the Quality and Cellulose Modification of Brown Rice. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 96, 103744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Bai, J.-W.; Li, D.-D.; Aheto, J.H.; Qi, Z.-Y.; Reziwanguli, A.; Cai, J.-R.; Tian, X.-Y. Effects of Three Emerging Non-Thermal Pretreatments on Drying Kinetics, Physicochemical Quality, and Microstructure of Garlic Slices. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2024, 17, 4325–4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Ramezan, Y.; Kamkari, A.; Lashkari, A.; Moradi, D.; Tabrizi, A.N. A Review on Mechanisms and Impacts of Cold Plasma Treatment as a Non-thermal Technology on Food Pigments. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 1502–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Bai, J.-W.; Xiao, H.-W.; Ma, H.-L.; Zhou, C.-S. Artificial Neural Network Modeling of Drying Kinetics and Color Changes of Ginkgo Biloba Seeds during Microwave Drying Process. J. Food Qual. 2018, 1, 3278595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Osae, R.; Zhou, C.; Xu, B.; Tchabo, W.; Tahir, H.E.; Mustapha, A.T.; Ma, H. Effects of Ultrasound, Osmotic Dehydration, and Osmosonication Pretreatments on Bioactive Compounds, Chemical Characterization, Enzyme Inactivation, Color, and Antioxidant Activity of Dried Ginger Slices. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, e12832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Oladejo, A.O.; Ma, H.; Qu, W.; Zhou, C.; Wu, B.; Yang, X. Influence of Ultrasound Pretreatments on Diffusion Coefficients, Texture and Colour of Osmodehydrated Sweet Potato (Ipomea batatas). Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 888–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Zhang, Z.-H.; Huang, X.; Chen, J.; Qin, Y.; Gao, X. Recent Research and Prospects of Non-Thermal Physical Technologies in Green and High-Efficient Extraction of Natural Pigments: A Review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 92, 103593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Amorim, D.S.; Amorim, I.S.; Chisté, R.C.; Filho, J.T.; Fernandes, F.A.N.; Godoy, H.T. Effects of Cold Plasma on Chlorophylls, Carotenoids, Anthocyanins, and Betalains. Food Res. Int. 2023, 167, 112593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Umair, M.; Jabbar, S.; Nasiru, M.M.; Senan, A.M.; Zhuang, H.; Zhang, J. Sequential Application of High-Voltage Electric Field Cold Plasma Treatment and Acid Blanching Improves the Quality of Fresh Carrot Juice (Daucus carota L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 15311–15318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Varilla, C.; Marcone, M.; Annor, G.A. Potential of Cold Plasma Technology in Ensuring the Safety of Foods and Agricultural Produce: A Review. Foods 2020, 9, 1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Yang, X.; Ju, S.; Liu, M.; Feng, J.; Du, M.; Zhuang, J.; Ma, R.; Jiao, Z.; Zhou, R.; Cullen, P.J. Effect of Cold Atmospheric Surface Microdischarge Plasma on the Inactivation of Fusarium Moniliforme and Physicochemical Properties of Chinese Yam Flour. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2024, 17, 1072–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Gupta, R.K.; Guha, P.; Srivastav, P.P. Effect of High Voltage Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) Atmospheric Cold Plasma Treatment on Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Taro (Colocasia esculenta) Starch. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 126772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Lee, H.S.; Park, H.H.; Min, S.C. Microbial Decontamination of Red Pepper Powder Using Pulsed Light Plasma. J. Food Eng. 2020, 284, 110075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Zhang, W.; Wang, A.; Lv, Z.; Gao, Z. Nondestructive Measurement of Kiwifruit Firmness, Soluble Solid Content (SSC), Titratable Acidity (TA), and Sensory Quality by Vibration Spectrum. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 1058–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Guo, Y.; Wu, B.; Guo, X.; Liu, D.; Qiu, C.; Ma, H. Effect of Thermosonication on Texture Degradation of Carrot Tissue in Relation to Alterations in Cell Membrane and Cell Wall Structure. Food Chem. 2022, 393, 133335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Liu, Y.; Qu, W.; Liu, Y.; Ma, H.; Tuly, J.A. Physicochemical Indicators Coupled with Statistical Tools for Comprehensive Evaluation of the Novel Infrared Peeling on Tomatoes. LWT 2024, 191, 115634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Gao, K.; Liu, B.; Wu, B.; Guo, Y.; Song, C.; Nan, S.; Dai, J.; Shen, Y.; Ma, H. A Study on the Effect Mechanism of Pectin Modification on the Carrot Cell Wall’s Texture Formation under Ultrasonic and Infrared Drying. Agriculture 2024, 14, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Shanker, M.A.; Khanashyam, A.C.; Pandiselvam, R.; Joshi, T.J.; Thomas, P.E.; Zhang, Y.; Rustagi, S.; Bharti, S.; Thirumdas, R.; Kumar, M.; et al. Implications of Cold Plasma and Plasma Activated Water on Food Texture—A Review. Food Control 2023, 151, 109793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Abarghuei, F.M.; Etemadi, M.; Ramezanian, A.; Esehaghbeygi, A.; Alizargar, J. An Application of Cold Atmospheric Plasma to Enhance Physiological and Biochemical Traits of Basil. Plants 2021, 10, 2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Zargarchi, S.; Esatbeyoglu, T. Assessing the Impact of Cold Plasma Rotational Dynamics on Ginger’s Total Phenolic Content, Antioxidant Activity, Surface Structure and Color Using Response Surface Methodology. LWT 2024, 208, 116682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Liu, C.; Xue, Y.; Guo, J.; Ren, H.; Jiang, S.; Li, D.; Song, J.; Zhang, Z. Citric Acid and Sucrose Pretreatment Improves the Crispness of Puffed Peach Chips by Regulating Cell Structure and Mechanical Properties. LWT 2021, 142, 111036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Xu, B.; Chen, J.; Yuan, J.; Azam, S.R.; Zhang, M. Effect of Different Thawing Methods on the Efficiency and Quality Attributes of Frozen Red Radish. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 3237–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Feng, L.; Xu, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Song, J.; Li, D.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, C.; Liu, C.; Jiang, N.; Zhang, M.; et al. Effects of Pre-Drying Treatments Combined with Explosion Puffing Drying on the Physicochemical Properties, Antioxidant Activities and Flavor Characteristics of Apples. Food Chem. 2021, 338, 128015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Rashid, M.T.; Ma, H.; Safdar, B.; Ahmed Jatoi, M.; Wali, A.; Sarpong, F.; Zhou, C. Synergy of Ultrasound and Osmotic Dehydration in Improving Drying Kinetics and Quality of Dried Sweet Potato (Ipomea batatas L.). J. Food Saf. Food Qual.-Arch. Leb. 2019, 70, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Xu, B.; Feng, M.; Chitrakar, B.; Cheng, J.; Wei, B.; Wang, B.; Zhou, C.; Ma, H. Multi-Frequency Power Thermosonication Treatments of Clear Strawberry Juice: Impact on Color, Bioactive Compounds, Flavor Volatiles, Microbial and Polyphenol Oxidase Inactivation. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2023, 84, 103295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Jin, W.; Zhao, S.; Sun, H.; Pei, J.; Gao, R.; Jiang, P. Characterization and Discrimination of Flavor Volatiles of Different Colored Wheat Grains after Cooking Based on GC-IMS and Chemometrics. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2023, 7, 100583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Huang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Mehmood, A.; Lu, T.; Chen, X. Unraveling the Temporal Changes of Maillard Reaction Products and Aroma Profile in Coffee Leaves during Hot-Air Drying. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2024, 128, 106055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wu, F.; Gu, D.; Tao, H.; Zhang, R. Organic Acid and Aromatic Compounds Create Distinctive Flavor in the Blackening Process of Jujube. Food Chem. 2024, 439, 138199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Sruthi, N.U.; Josna, K.; Pandiselvam, R.; Kothakota, A.; Gavahian, M.; Mousavi Khaneghah, A. Impacts of Cold Plasma Treatment on Physicochemical, Functional, Bioactive, Textural, and Sensory Attributes of Food: A Comprehensive Review. Food Chem. 2022, 368, 130809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Li, Y.; Yuan, L.; Liu, H.; Liu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Li, M.; Gao, R. Analysis of the Changes of Volatile Flavor Compounds in a Traditional Chinese Shrimp Paste during Fermentation Based on Electronic Nose, SPME-GC-MS and HS-GC-IMS. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2023, 12, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Chen, M.; Chen, T.; Qi, X.; Lu, D.; Chen, B. Analyzing Changes of Volatile Components in Dried Pork Slice by Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectroscopy. CyTA J. Food 2020, 18, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Yu, S.; Huang, X.; Wang, L.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y. Characterization of Selected Chinese Soybean Paste Based on Flavor Profiles Using HS-SPME-GC/MS, E-Nose and E-Tongue Combined with Chemometrics. Food Chem. 2022, 375, 131840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Wang, L.; Huang, X.; Yu, S.; Xiong, F.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ren, Y. Characterization of the Volatile Flavor Profiles of Zhenjiang Aromatic Vinegar Combining a Novel Nanocomposite Colorimetric Sensor Array with HS-SPME-GC/MS. Food Res. Int. 2022, 159, 111585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Ramkumar, R.; Arun Prasath, V.; Karpoora Sundara Pandian, N.; Patra, A.; Sharma, P.; Arulkumar, M.; Sivaranjani, S.; Govindarasu, P. Investigating the Influence of Pin-to-Plate Atmospheric Cold Plasma on the Physiochemical, Nutritional, and Shelf-Life Study of Two Raisins Varieties during Storage. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2024, 18, 7774–7793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Ahmadian, S.; Kenari, R.E.; Amiri, Z.R.; Sohbatzadeh, F.; Khodaparast, M.H.H. Effect of Ultrasound-Assisted Cold Plasma Pretreatment on Cell Wall Polysaccharides Distribution and Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis L.). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 233, 123557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Amirabadi, S.; Milani, J.M.; Sohbatzadeh, F. Application of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma to Hydrophobically Modification of Gum Arabic with Enhanced Surface Properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 104, 105724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Shokoohi, F.; Ebadi, M.-T.; Ghomi, H.; Ayyari, M. Changes in Qualitative Characteristics of Garden Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) as Affected by Cold Plasma. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2022, 31, 100411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Wu, H.; Chai, Z.; Hutabarat, R.P.; Zeng, Q.; Niu, L.; Li, D.; Yu, H.; Huang, W. Blueberry Leaves from 73 Different Cultivars in Southeastern China as Nutraceutical Supplements Rich in Antioxidants. Food Res. Int. 2019, 122, 548–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Wong, F.-C.; Xiao, J.; Wang, S.; Ee, K.-Y.; Chai, T.-T. Advances on the Antioxidant Peptides from Edible Plant Sources. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 99, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Luo, X.; Cui, J.; Zhang, H.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, D.; Cai, M.; Chen, G. Ultrasound Assisted Extraction of Polyphenolic Compounds from Red Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Bran and Their Biological Activities and Polyphenolic Compositions. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 112, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Saremnezhad, S.; Soltani, M.; Faraji, A.; Hayaloglu, A.A. Chemical Changes of Food Constituents during Cold Plasma Processing: A Review. Food Res. Int. 2021, 147, 110552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Kumar, S.; Pipliya, S.; Srivastav, P.P. Effect of Cold Plasma on Different Polyphenol Compounds: A Review. J. Food Process Eng. 2023, 46, e14203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Dakshayani, R.; Paul, A.; Mahendran, R. Cold Plasma-Induced Effects on Bioactive Constituents and Antioxidant Potential of Lotus Petal Powder. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2021, 49, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Garimella, J.N.; Pradhan, R.C. Effect of (Multi Pin) Atmospheric Cold Plasma Treatment on Curcumin Extraction and Investigating Phytochemicals, Antioxidants, Physical and Morphological Properties of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) Powder. Food Chem. 2024, 449, 139233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Tabibian, S.A.; Labbafi, M.; Askari, G.H.; Rezaeinezhad, A.R.; Ghomi, H. Effect of Gliding Arc Discharge Plasma Pretreatment on Drying Kinetic, Energy Consumption and Physico-Chemical Properties of Saffron (Crocus sativus L.). J. Food Eng. 2020, 270, 109766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Wen, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Duan, Y.; Ma, H. Plant Protein-Derived Antioxidant Peptides: Isolation, Identification, Mechanism of Action and Application in Food Systems: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 105, 308–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Dharini, M.; Jaspin, S.; Mahendran, R. Cold Plasma Reactive Species: Generation, Properties, and Interaction with Food Biomolecules. Food Chem. 2023, 405, 134746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Gao, X.; Liu, E.; Yin, Y.; Yang, L.; Huang, Q.; Chen, S.; Ho, C.-T. Enhancing Activities of Salt-Tolerant Proteases Secreted by Aspergillus oryzae Using Atmospheric and Room-Temperature Plasma Mutagenesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 2757–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  251. Mollakhalili-Meybodi, N.; Yousefi, M.; Nematollahi, A.; Khorshidian, N. Effect of Atmospheric Cold Plasma Treatment on Technological and Nutrition Functionality of Protein in Foods. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2021, 247, 1579–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Tsukagoshi, H. Control of Root Growth and Development by Reactive Oxygen Species. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 29, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Pan, J.; Zhang, Z.; Mintah, B.K.; Xu, H.; Dabbour, M.; Cheng, Y.; Dai, C.; He, R.; Ma, H. Effects of Nonthermal Physical Processing Technologies on Functional, Structural Properties and Digestibility of Food Protein: A Review. J. Food Process Eng. 2022, 45, e14010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Jiang, Y.-H.; Cheng, J.-H.; Sun, D.-W. Effects of Plasma Chemistry on the Interfacial Performance of Protein and Polysaccharide in Emulsion. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 98, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Mandalari, G.; Barreca, D.; Gervasi, T.; Roussell, M.A.; Klein, B.; Feeney, M.J.; Carughi, A. Pistachio Nuts (Pistacia vera L.): Production, Nutrients, Bioactives and Novel Health Effects. Plants 2021, 11, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Li, B.; Peng, L.; Cao, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhu, Y.; Dou, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, C. Insights into Cold Plasma Treatment on the Cereal and Legume Proteins Modification: Principle, Mechanism, and Application. Foods 2024, 13, 1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Hu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Aalim, H.; Cao, Y.; Peng, L.; Dou, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhai, X.; Guo, Z.; Cai, J.; et al. Cold Plasma-Assisted Pretreatment for Fabrication and Characterization of Rice Starch-Stearic Acid Complexes. Food Biosci. 2024, 60, 104492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Lin, L.; Liao, X.; Li, C.; Abdel-Samie, M.A.; Siva, S.; Cui, H. Cold Nitrogen Plasma Modified Cuminaldehyde/β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex and Its Application in Vegetable Juices Preservation. Food Res. Int. 2021, 141, 110132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Kopuk, B.; Gunes, R.; Palabiyik, I. Cold Plasma Modification of Food Macromolecules and Effects on Related Products. Food Chem. 2022, 382, 132356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Khan, A.W.; Roobab, U.; Wang, Z.; Raza, M.M.; Nawazish, H.; Islam, F.; Aadil, R.M. Salt Reduction in Food Products: A Systematic Review of Clean-Label Ingredients and Non-Thermal Technologies. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 153, 104695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Jaddu, S.; Sonkar, S.; Seth, D.; Dwivedi, M.; Pradhan, R.C.; Goksen, G.; Kumar Sarangi, P.; Režek Jambrak, A. Cold Plasma: Unveiling Its Impact on Hydration, Rheology, Nutritional, and Anti-Nutritional Properties in Food Materials—An Overview. Food Chem. X 2024, 22, 101266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Priyadarshini, A.; Rajauria, G.; O’Donnell, C.P.; Tiwari, B.K. Emerging Food Processing Technologies and Factors Impacting Their Industrial Adoption. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 3082–3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Ashtiani, S.-H.M.; Aghkhani, M.H.; Feizy, J.; Martynenko, A. Effect of Cold Plasma Pretreatment Coupled with Osmotic Dehydration on Drying Kinetics and Quality of Mushroom (Agaricus bisporus). Food Bioprocess Technol. 2023, 16, 2854–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Ebrahimi, E.; Hosseini, S.I.; Samadlouie, H.R.; Mohammadhosseini, B.; Cullen, P.J. Surface Barrier Discharge Remote Plasma Inactivation of Aspergillus Niger ATCC 10864 Spores for Packaged Crocus Sativus. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2023, 16, 2570–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Tripathy, S.; Srivastav, P.P. Effect of Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) Cold Plasma-Activated Water Pre-Treatment on the Drying Properties, Kinetic Parameters, and Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Centella asiatica Leaves. Chemosphere 2023, 332, 138901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Seelarat, W.; Sangwanna, S.; Panklai, T.; Chaosuan, N.; Bootchanont, A.; Wattanawikkam, C.; Subcharoen, A.; Subcharoen, N.; Chanchula, N.; Boonyawan, D.; et al. Enhanced Fruiting Body Production and Bioactive Phytochemicals from White Cordyceps militaris by Blending Cordyceps militaris and Using Cold Plasma Jet. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2023, 43, 139–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Bao, T.; Hao, X.; Shishir, M.R.I.; Karim, N.; Chen, W. Green Alternative Methods for Pretreatment of Whole Jujube before the Drying Process. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 1030–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, S.; Yang, D.; Huang, J.; Huang, H.; Sun, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, C. Advances in Atmospheric Cold Plasma Technology for Plant-Based Food Safety, Functionality, and Quality Implications. Foods 2025, 14, 2999. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14172999

AMA Style

Liu S, Yang D, Huang J, Huang H, Sun J, Yang Z, Zhou C. Advances in Atmospheric Cold Plasma Technology for Plant-Based Food Safety, Functionality, and Quality Implications. Foods. 2025; 14(17):2999. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14172999

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Siyao, Danni Yang, Jiangqi Huang, Huiling Huang, Jinyuan Sun, Zhen Yang, and Chenguang Zhou. 2025. "Advances in Atmospheric Cold Plasma Technology for Plant-Based Food Safety, Functionality, and Quality Implications" Foods 14, no. 17: 2999. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14172999

APA Style

Liu, S., Yang, D., Huang, J., Huang, H., Sun, J., Yang, Z., & Zhou, C. (2025). Advances in Atmospheric Cold Plasma Technology for Plant-Based Food Safety, Functionality, and Quality Implications. Foods, 14(17), 2999. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14172999

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop