Next Article in Journal
Formation Mechanism of Lipid and Flavor of Lard Under the Intervention of Heating Temperature via UPLC-TOF-MS/MS with OPLS-DA and HS-GC-IMS Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Fatty Acid and Aroma Profiles of Microencapsulated Olive Oils from Southeastern Anatolia: Effects of Cultivar Variations, Storage Time, and Wall Material Formulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Elemental and Isotopic Fingerprints of Potatoes

1
National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, 67-103 Donat Street, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
National Research and Development Institute of Cryogenics and Isotopic Technologies-ICSI Rm. Valcea, 4 Uzinei Str., 240050 Rm. Valcea, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(14), 2440; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142440
Submission received: 23 May 2025 / Revised: 23 June 2025 / Accepted: 8 July 2025 / Published: 10 July 2025

Abstract

Nowadays, food traceability represents an important issue in the current context of trade agreements, which influence global food prices. Many consumers prefer to pay a higher price for a traditional cultivation regime of a certain food product that comes from a certain region, appreciating the taste of the respective foodstuff. The potato is now the world’s fourth most important food crop in terms of human consumption, after wheat, maize, and rice. In this context, 100 potato samples from the Romanian market were collected. While 68 samples came from Romania, the rest of the 32 were from abroad (Hungary, France, Greece, Italy, Germany, Egypt, and Poland). The countries selected for potato sample analysis are among the main exporters of potatoes to the Romanian market. The samples were investigated by their multi-elemental and isotopic (2H, 18O and 13C) fingerprints, using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) and Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS). Then, to distinguish the geographical origin, the experimental results were statistically processed using linear discriminant analysis (LDA). The best markers that emphasize Romanian potatoes were identified to be δ13Cbulk, δ2Hwater, and Sr.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The potato (Solanum tuberosum L., family Solanaceae) is the most important non-cereal food crop globally, with more than 1 billion people worldwide consuming it [1]. The potato is now the world’s fourth most important food crop in terms of human consumption, after wheat, maize, and rice [2,3], playing a pivotal role in ensuring global food security [4]. Potatoes are gaining popularity among consumers due to their sustainability and nutritional benefits, being promoted as a healthy and versatile component of a nutritious and balanced diet [5]. It is a nutritious food, consisting of about 77% water, 16.3% starch, 0.9% sugar, 4.4% protein, 0.9% minerals, 0.59% fiber, and 0.14% crude fat, and it contains various amounts of health-promoting components such as vitamin C and phenolic compounds; it is also a good source of vitamins (B1, B3, and B6) and minerals, and it has protein content comparable to that of cereal grains [6,7]. Potatoes constitute a significant dietary source of minerals; they provide 18% of the recommended dietary allowance of K; 6% of Fe, P, and Mg; and 2% of Ca and Zn [8]. In 2017, at the European Association for Potato Research (EAPR) Conference, the following three broad concerns were identified: food security and food safety; sustainable and environmentally friendly production addressing the question of natural resource management; and innovation in practice turning scientific results into products and processes to improve the performance of agri-food systems [9]. Earth’s growing population and the increasing demand for food place unprecedented pressure on agriculture and natural resources, and feeding this population nutritiously and sustainably will require improvements to the global food system for nutritious products to consumers while minimizing today’s environmental footprint [10]. A critical challenge is how to produce more food with fewer resources, without generating negative environmental impacts. Research related to the determination of the geographical origin of foodstuffs represents an important line of study, the promulgation of international laws regulating the attribution of product origins being an indication of the growing interest in this field, especially nowadays when food traceability represents an important issue in the current context of trade agreements, which influence global food prices.
Many analytical methodologies have been employed to determine foods’ place of origin. Among them, the monitoring of trace elements content from a specific foodstuff together with the isotopic fingerprint of oxygen and hydrogen have proved to be the most effective [11,12]. In general, the research has followed diverse types of food, using different spectrometric methods, such as inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [13,14], high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [15,16], stable isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) [17,18,19], and metabolomics based on LC-MS/GC-MS [20,21].
The determination of the geographical origin through chemical analysis coupled with sophisticated data classifying techniques is timely, and the food and nutrition database is important for an accurate evaluation of nutrient intake from dietary surveys. Potato production depends on the intensive use of fertilizers and pesticides, leading to serious environmental and food safety concerns [22]. The content of micronutrients and trace elements of potato tubers is influenced by factors such as the type of production system used for their growth, the genotype of the plants, and the weather conditions during the growing season. Cross-contamination of the human food chain with risk elements such as heavy metals is an important problem, as these elements that are mainly anthropogenic in nature not only affect the nutritional value of food, but they also have harmful effects on the health of consumers [23]. An increasing number of scientific studies are aimed at developing analytical/chemometric strategies for the geographical classification of potatoes [4,24,25,26].
The economic crisis has accelerated the prices of the main food commodities. Nevertheless, many consumers prefer to pay a higher price for a traditional cultivation regime of a certain product (potatoes, in this case) that comes from a certain region, appreciating the taste of the respective foodstuff. For the better promotion of Romanian products, there is a need to develop new fast and precise analytical approaches that are capable of differentiating the quality and origin of Romanian potatoes. In this context, the aim of this study was to characterize the potatoes from the Romanian market, according to their geographical origin, by determining the mineral and trace element concentrations, along with stable isotope signatures from these samples. Then, the entire experimental data set was processed using a chemometric supervised method, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), to emphasize the most important markers that could distinguish the geographical origin of potatoes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling

A total of 100 potato samples were investigated using the mass spectrometry technique, determining their elemental and isotopic profiles. Samples were collected from both supermarkets and family farms (rural regions). Of these, 68 samples originated from Romania (39 were white-skinned potatoes and 29 red-skinned), and the rest of the 32 were from abroad (Hungary, n = 6; Greece, n = 7; France, n = 8; Italy, n = 2; Germany, n = 2; Egypt, n = 2; Poland, n = 3; Tunisia, n = 1; Netherlands, n = 1). Among the imported samples, 23 were white-skinned (Hungary, n = 2; Greece, n = 6; France, n = 6; Italy, n = 2; Germany, n = 2; Egypt, n = 2; Poland, n = 2; Tunisia, n = 1), and nine samples were red-skinned (Hungary, n = 4; Greece, n = 1; France, n = 2; Poland, n = 1; Netherlands, n = 1). The countries selected for potato sample analysis are among the main exporters of potatoes to the Romanian market. These countries were chosen based on their significant presence in Romania’s potato imports, making them relevant for assessing the quality and characteristics of imported potatoes. All samples were stored in clean polyethylene bags according to their type and brought to the laboratory for analysis.
Before determining the elemental and isotopic compositions of the samples, in the laboratory, from each potato sample, the water was extracted by a procedure that used cryogenic distillation under vacuum [11]. At the end of this procedure, the obtained samples were completely dry, without any water content (Figure 1).
Then, from the extracted water, 2Hwater and 18Owater signatures were determined. The dried part of each potato sample was divided into two lots, one for subsequent elemental concentration determination and the other one for 13Cbulk isotopic investigation. Both parts were prepared separately, according to proper protocol.

2.2. Elemental Measurements

For ICP-MS, ultrapure deionized water (resistivity of 18 MΩ cm−1) from a Milli-Q analytical reagent grade water purification system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and ultrapure nitric acid (HNO3, Merck, KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) 60% were used. A total of 0.1 g (accurate to 0.0001 g) of potato sample was placed into a digester and mixed with 3 mL of concentrated nitric acid with the controlled program (pressure and temperature) for 12 min at 200 °C, using a microwave oven model Speedwave (Berghof Products and Instruments Ltd., Eningen, Germany). After digestion, each digest was transferred with ultrapure water to 50 mL. The digested solution was analyzed using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer.
For the characterization of the studied food samples, an ELAN DRC (e) inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer was used, produced by Perkin Elmer (Pure Plus, Billerica, MA, USA), with a Meinhard nebulizer and glass cyclonic spray chamber for pneumatic nebulization. Primary analysis was performed using the semi-quantitative method Total Quant, a method that is recommended in fingerprint analyses where large amounts of analytes are essential. Semi-quantitative analyses are a particularly useful tool for the rapid analysis of the entire mass spectrum, especially for a sample with an unknown composition. The rare earth elements (REEs) were determined using the Total Quant method.
The precise determination of heavy metals in foods is very important because there is a narrow margin of safety between adequate intake and overconsumption. Several parameters were evaluated to validate the analytical method for the quantitative determination of the major and trace elements in food samples. Linearity was established using calibration curves that were obtained for aqueous reference solutions for all the analytes, and the linearity values of the six points were found to be acceptable (R > 0.999). The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were experimentally calculated as three and ten times the standard deviation (SD) of the blank determination, divided by the slope of the analytical curve. The method was previously validated, and the LOD for each target metal was measured in mg/kg as follows: 0.5 (Na), 1.0 (Ca, Mg), 5.0 (K), 0.001 (Al, Co, Sr, Ba), 0.003 (Fe), 0.005 (As, Cd, Pb, Ni, V), 0.006 (Cr, Cu, Mn, Zn). The accuracy (as recovery) and precision (as relative standard deviation [RSD]) of the procedure were determined by analyzing two certified reference materials, CRMNCS ZC85006 tomato trace elements and CRM IAEA-359 cabbage trace elements (China National Analysis Center for Iron and Steel, Beijing, China), which were mineralized similarly to the samples. The results showed that the data obtained by ICP-MS were in agreement at the 95% confidence limit. The recovery ranged from 80 to 110%, which testified the applicability of the method to potatoes. The mean relative standard deviations of replicate samples were under 10%. The agreement between the certified and measured values was good, demonstrating the satisfactory performance of the developed method.
The performance of the ICP-MS analysis strongly depends on the operating conditions. The ELAN DRC (e) uses chemical resolution to eliminate plasma-based polyatomic species before they reach the quadrupole mass spectrometer. This ion molecule chemistry uses a reaction gas to “chemically scrub” polyatomic or isobaric species from the ion beam before they enter the analyzer, resulting in improved detection limits for traditional difficult elements, including As, Cr, Fe, Se, and others. Cu, Cr, and Fe were determined using the DRC mode with methane at 0.8 L/min. in the reaction chamber, and a rejection parameter value of 0.7 was applied.
The operating conditions were as follows: nebulizer gas flow rate = 0.92 L/min; auxiliary gas flow = 1.2 L/min; plasma gas flow = 15 L/min; lens voltage = 7.25 V; ICP radio frequency power = 1100 W; CeO/Ce ratio = 0.028; and Ba++/Ba+ = 0.029. The instrument was tuned daily with an Elan 6100 Setup/Stab/Masscal Solution (a solution of 10 µg/L Mg, Cu, Cd, In, Ba, Ce, Pb, and U in 1% HNO3) following the manufacturer’s specifications.

2.3. Stable Isotope Measurements

Each dried potato sample was crushed, using a ball mill, to obtain a fine powder. Then, 5 mg samples were converted to CO2 by dry combustion, in oxygen excess for 3 h, at 550 °C. The resulting CO2 was purified from other combustion gases by cryogenic separation and subsequently measured by the isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) technique.
The isotopic composition (signature or fingerprint) is denoted in delta values δ versus international standards, following Equation (1) [27]:
δ i X = R s a m p l e R s t a n d a r d 1 1000
where i represents the mass number of the heavier isotope of the element X (2H, 18O, 13C), Rsample is the isotope number ratio of a sample (2H/1H; 18O/16O; 13C/12C), and Rstandard is that of the international standard (Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water, V-SMOW, for δ2H and δ18O, and Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite, V-PDB, for δ13C). The delta values are multiplied by 1000 and are expressed commonly in units “per mil” (‰) or, according to the International System of Units (SI), in units milli Urey (mUr) [28].
To determine the δ13C isotopic signature of CO2 derived from potatoes, an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Delta V Advantage, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a dual inlet system was used. Prior to daily sample analysis, a working standard was measured and calibrated against the NBS-22 oil certified reference material (δ13CVPDB = −30.03‰) provided by the IAEA Vienna (International Atomic Energy Agency). The measurement of each sample consisted of two acquisitions, each of them containing eight cycles of analysis. The standard deviation per analysis was consistently below 0.05‰, and the associated measurement uncertainty was ±0.3‰.
A liquid–water isotope analyzer (DLT-100, Los Gatos Research, San Jose, CA, USA) was used for measurements of 2H and 18O from potato-extracted water. For 13C/12C determinations, the analyses were performed using an isotopic ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS, Delta V Advantage, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A set of five reference materials (RM), calibrated against the Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water international standard, V-SMOW, was used for calibration purposes, covering the following broad isotopic range: RM1, δ18O = −19.57 ± 0.1‰ and δ2H = −154.1 ± 1‰; RM2, δ18O = −15.55 ± 0.1‰ and δ2H = −117.0 ± 1‰; RM3, δ18O = −11.54 ± 0.1‰ and δ2H = −79.0 ± 1‰; RM4, δ18O = −7.14 ± 0.1‰ and δ2H = −43.6 ± 1‰; and RM5, δ18O = −2.96 ± 0.1‰ and δ2H = −9.8 ± 1‰. All samples were measured in duplicate. Each analysis consisted of 7 acquisition cycles; the first 3 cycles were discarded to eliminate potential memory effects. The final result was calculated as the average of the remaining 4 cycles. The maximum standard deviation of the isotopic analysis was ±0.2‰ for δ18O and ±1.0‰ for δ2H, respectively.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Chemometric experimental data processing was performed using SPSS Statistics version 24 (IBM, New York, NY, USA) software. One of the most widely used supervised methods for fingerprinting purposes is linear discriminant analysis (LDA). The aim of the method is to find the samples that have the most similar characteristics (low distance) and that are different from the rest (longer distance).
Alongside the experimental data set, a new variable is created for each category that is under study. Within this new variable, each sample receives a code specific to its characteristics. The results of this method are discriminant functions (DFs), which are linear combinations of each representative variable. This chemometric model is validated using “leave-one-out cross validation”, which means that each sample is tested as a new one. The results of initial and cross-validation steps are expressed in percentages; the higher the values are, the more robust the model is. In this study, LDA was applied for geographical classification and for highlighting the differences between red and white potatoes.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Elemental Results

The quantitative contribution of macro elements represented more than 80% of all investigated minerals. Considering the major elements, it can be observed that potato is an important source of potassium (K), which is the most abundant element compared with calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), and phosphorous (P). This observation is in agreement with other studies regarding the macro element profile of potatoes (Table 1), with potassium variability depending on the geographical origin of the potato. The decrease in mean concentrations was in the following order (g/kg, dry weight): K > P > Mg > Ca > Na. The differences in mineral nutrient compositions between potatoes could be attributed to the adaptation mechanisms of potato accession to the growing conditions [29].
Potassium plays a key role in good overall plant health and is essential for the completion of various physiological and metabolic functions in plants; it is considered the second most abundant nutrient after nitrogen, and it is even more abundant than phosphorous [36]. Potato crops require a high amount of potassium to achieve the ideal yield and quality, with the role of potassium in potato plant growth, in the biochemistry of starch synthesis, and in tuber quantity and quality being known [37]. It is the nutrient taken up in the largest quantity by potatoes throughout the growing season, influencing the transport of nutrients and the movement of carbohydrates from the leaf to the tuber [38,39]. Some factors such as the environment as well as crop management can affect the tuber potassium content. For example, drought conditions were found to increase K by about 12% [40]. Potassium levels in the analyzed potatoes (5.994–23.412 g/kg) were in line with those given by other studies [8,30,33,34,35].
Phosphorous plays a fundamental role in crop and vegetable physiology, the most important being the energy storage and transfer of it in plants [41,42]. The potato crop demands high phosphorus levels, and these are correlated with increased root development; thus, when phosphoric acid increases in the soil, plant roots can spread extensively [43,44]. The management of fertilizer phosphorus is a critical component of potato production systems, so the total phosphorous concentration in potato changes based on the growth stage and on the fertilization and applications of manure with high P concentrations [41,45]. The soil is a very important factor, with the sorption and desorption properties of this governing the phosphorous uptake by potatoes. There are studies that showed that the phosphorous solubility increased as soil pH changed from acid to neutral pH [42,46], that the potato production would be tolerant of acid soil as long as the aluminum concentration is low, or that the acidic soils rich in aluminum and iron ions would mainly fix and precipitate P as an Al–Fe–P component [41,42]. The total content of P in most plant tissues ranges from 0.1 to 1% [47]. The mean content of studied potatoes (1.707 g/kg) is within the range of contents reported by other authors [8,30,31,32,33,34,35].
Calcium is an essential macronutrient for plant growth and development, with vital structural, metabolic, and signaling roles [48]. Potatoes were found to take up significantly different quantities of calcium depending on the variety of potato studied; thus, in the studied potatoes, the range was 0.087–3.131 g/kg, with a mean of 0.453 g/kg, in line with some papers [8,30,31,32,33,34,35].
Magnesium is an essential nutrient for potato plants, playing a crucial role in various metabolic processes. It is a critical nutrient for potato production, affecting many aspects of plant growth and development, with a vital role in chlorophyll synthesis and the enzyme activation involved in energy metabolism and protein synthesis [49]. Our results emphasized that the Mg concentration (g/kg) ranged between 0.475 and 5.400 (mean of 1.109). The literature indicates similar values [31,33]. It seems that the content of Mg is connected to the amount of rainfall, irrigation and fertilization protocols, average climate and temperature, sun, light, and irradiation [50].
Trace elements are indispensable for the cultivation of quality plants and are essential for their good growth. Even if they are found in small quantities, they form a balance corresponding to their growth, with a role in plant metabolism [51]. The concentrations of some of the trace elements in the studied potatoes were in the following ranges (mg/kg): <0.001–0.515 ± 0.036 (Li); <0.001–0.023 ± 0.002 (Be); <0.001–0.661 ± 0.035 (Co); 0.019 ± 0.001–0.585 ± 0.033 (V); <0.001–11.236 ± 0.995 (Ti). The mean concentration for boron and molybdenum was 6.206 ± 0.455 mg/kg and 0.384 ± 0.022 mg/kg. Boron has a key role in the growth process, but optimizing the utilization of calcium and molybdenum can be important at low soil pH levels. In the case of an insufficient supply of molybdenum, the chlorophyll content of plants decreases, and the process of photosynthesis becomes difficult. Comparative reported values for the investigated microelements in studied potatoes (this study versus other references) are presented in Table 2. Generally, potatoes contain moderate amounts of iron (Fe), which should be readily bioavailable because potatoes have very low phytic acid concentrations, unlike some other crops. Vitamin C from potatoes is essential for the absorption of iron in the body (potatoes contain 45% of the recommended daily intake of vitamin C) [50]. The concentrations of Fe in studied samples (mean of 73.659 mg/kg) were in line with [34,52,53] or even higher [33] than those from other studies. The elements zinc (Zn), cooper (Cu), chromium (Cr), and nickel (Ni), from the trace elements category were recorded in investigated samples, and the accumulation pattern in studied potatoes was in the order Zn > Cu > Cr > Ni. The same order was found in other studies [54]. The mean concentration of these elements (9.344 mg Zn/kg, 4.580 mg Cu/kg, 3.80 mg Cr/kg, 2.961 mg Ni/kg) was in line with the literature [31,55,56]. The highest concentrations of Cr and Cu in potatoes were 21.455 mg/kg and 55.544 mg/kg. The greatest accumulation of Cr in potatoes could be caused by the influence of soil salinity on the mobility of heavy metals or by the fact that it could be contaminated by Cr in the irrigation water, even when grown in unpolluted soil. Regarding Cu, it also plays a role in metabolism and protein synthesis, but the excess of this in the soil induces stress in the plants, delays their growth, and causes chlorosis of the leaves. Manganese, like zinc, is important from the point of view of cultivation, as it participates as an activator in the metabolic process of plants, and zinc has an important role in nitrogen assimilation and metabolism, contributing to the formation of starch. Mn concentration tends to vary with environmental conditions, and toxicity due to excess Mn can damage potato plant growth, especially when the pH level is low [57,58]. Bedoya-Perales et al. (2023) [59] reported similar levels of Mn (1.086–15.145 mg/kg), Ba (0.070–1.350 mg/kg), and Cu (0.970–1.534 mg/kg).
The potential of information obtained from rubidium content in potato culture is still unexploited. This element plays a crucial role in various physiological processes of potato plants, including nutrient uptake and assimilation; it contributes to the accumulation of starch, vitamins, and minerals, enhancing the nutritional value of potatoes. Rubidium has been found to enhance potato plants’ tolerance to abiotic stresses, such as drought and salinity [60]. Strontium can be efficiently accumulated by plants, with its content being strongly positively correlated with its concentration in the growth medium; thus, the strontium in the nutrient medium can help to functionalize some plants [61,62,63]. The wide range of strontium concentrations obtained in the studied potato samples (0.308 ± 0.020–14.586 ± 1.120 mg/kg) highlights the fact that the process of nutrient uptake from a medium supplemented with strontium is complex and based on a lot of factors (e.g., plant species, time, balance between nutrients in the growth medium) [64,65]. Strontium can be used as a tracer for calcium uptake and allocation in the short-term, making it a powerful tool for studying factors that govern calcium allocation to plant organs [66].
Monitoring the content of toxic and potentially toxic elements is one of the most important aspects of food quality assurance [67]. The vegetable uptake of metals is one of the major pathways through which soil metals enter the food chain. The accumulation of toxic metals in soils is a major factor determining the high levels of these metals found in crops, and potatoes are in close contact with the soil and stay in the soil for several months before being cooked [54]. The mean concentrations of toxic metals in studied potatoes were (mg/kg) 0.028 (As), 0.09 (Cd), 0.026 (Hg), and 0.084 (Pb), respectively. Similar results were also reported for Czech potatoes (mg/kg) 0.5–0.7 (Pb), 0.08–0.3 (Cd) [53], or 0.06 (As), 0.6 (Pb), and 0.04 (Cd) [55]. Ref [52] reported similar levels (mg/kg,) of As (0.037–0.184), Pb (0.069–0.861), and Cd (0.021–0.076). The ability of the potato to absorb toxic metals from the soil was small; thus, the concentration of these elements in potatoes was below the maximum threshold of 0.1 mg/kg Pb and Cd [68,69].
Rare earth elements (REEs) are non-essential elements for living systems, but the long-term consumption of food contaminated with REEs may cause chronic poisoning. The lanthanoids, together with yttrium and scandium, form the group of REEs. REEs from agriculture and the natural environment could be ingested by humans throughout the food chain; thus, it is necessary to investigate the levels of REEs in food items. The REE mean concentrations in studied potatoes were as follows (mg/kg): 0.025 (Sc); 0.008 (Y); 0.018 (La); 0.040 (Ce); 0.004 (Pr); 0.015 (Nd); 0.002 (Sm); 0.0006 (Eu); 0.053 (Gd); 0.0002 (Tb); 0.001 (Dy); 0.0003 (Ho, Er); 0.0006 (Tm); 0.001 (Yb); and 0.0001 (Lu).
The comparative study of the elemental profile of autochthonous vs. imported potatoes presents the fact that the local potatoes had higher concentrations of some elements (Mg, Al, Ti, V, Cr, Fe, Ni, Rb, Sr, Ba, toxic metals) and lower concentrations of other elements (Na, P, K, Ca, Mn, Co, Cu, Zn) than those imported.
Regarding the potatoes’ skin color, the mean concentration of most elements was highest in white-skinned potatoes compared to the reds. Ref. [70] reported similar levels of K, P, Ca, and Mg (g/kg) (21.49; 3.07; 0.33; 1.17) and Zn, Cu, and Mn (mg/kg) (24.49; 7.56; 6.84) for the white potatoes. The mean concentrations of iron and zinc in red potatoes were 56.47 and 8.47 mg/kg, in line with the literature (19.28–63.94 mg/kg and 7.03–39.2 mg/kg) [71]. Additionally, there were some differences between different types of potatoes: (i) the average concentrations of macro elements (Na, P, K, Ca) or Mn, Cu, and Zn were higher in foreign white potatoes than in Romanian white potatoes; (ii) the average concentrations of most elements (V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, etc.) were lower in foreign red potatoes than in Romanian red potatoes.

3.2. Stable Isotopes Results

To obtain qualitative data linked to potatoes’ geographical origin, isotopic compositions of 2Hwater and 18Owater are plotted in Figure 2. An important difference was observed between the 2Hwater and 18Owater isotopic fingerprints of the Romanian and foreign potato samples.
For Romanian samples, δ2Hwater ranged from −62.4 to −32.9‰ (mean value of −39.9‰), and δ18Owater ranged between −6.9 and −1.7‰ (mean value of −3.3‰). These values are in the range of those published by [72] for Romanian conventional potatoes. Additionally, ref. [26] recorded similar results of δ18O for potato samples coming from two Slovenian macro-regions (Alpine and Dinaric). Regarding samples from abroad, the isotopic signature of 2H had a range of variation from −53.1 to +20.1‰ (mean of −31.6‰), and that of 18O was from −6.0 to 4.1‰ (mean of −2.7‰).
The isotopic compositions of 2H and 18O in water vary predictably with geographical origin, decreasing from low-latitude, low-elevation coastal regions to inland, high-latitude, mountainous regions [12,73]. The 18O and 2H content of potato water reflects the 18O and 2H fingerprint of the groundwater at the location where the plants are grown. Thus, the δ18O and δ2H measurements of potato water should provide valuable information about the sample’s origin.
The sample with the highest isotopic values of hydrogen (average of 17.2‰) and oxygen (average of 3.5‰) is a conventional potato, labeled “Egypt”. This is not surprising, as Egypt has a dry climate that is hot and dominated by desert and a low latitude (30°06′ N) compared to the other sample countries of origin. Higher evapotranspiration rates from this dry region can lead to enriched values of 2H and 18O [74]. Many potato samples were imported from different countries for the Romanian market, and this fact is also sustained by the isotopic results for these vegetables. Elevated values for δ2Hwater and δ18Owater were also obtained for samples originating from Greece or France, depending on the climatic particularities of the production area. Four samples from Greece and a few from France fit with Romanian potato isotopic values. This overlap could be attributed to the limited number of samples from each country and the lack of precise information about the cultivation locations, rather than a mislabeling of origin. Therefore, while the possibility of a false declaration cannot be entirely excluded, the observed similarity in isotopic signatures is more likely due to insufficient exact field information and direct traceability (such as sourcing the potatoes directly from farmers) and shared environmental characteristics. Regarding the Romanian potatoes, the lowest value was recorded for a sample produced in the Eastern Transylvanian region (Harghita), where the climate is colder and altitude is higher (1300–1400 m above sea level). Samples from Hungary overlap with those from Romania, with these two countries being neighbours, and the agricultural areas from where the potato samples came from are probably not far away from each other. This explanation could be sustained by the published paper [75], showing that a more important geographic differentiation of food samples using isotope and elemental compositions can be obtained by comparing products originating from areas far away from each other, whereas correct attribution is usually limited if production geographical regions are nearby locations. Additionally, a similar case was recorded for the isotopic signature of pork meat samples that came from the western part of Romania, near the Hungarian border, which presented similar results to those from Hungary [76].
The percentage of water in the potato samples varied between 72.4% and 93.5% (with an average of 80.9%) for the samples from Romania and between 75.0% and 90.6% (the average being 82.3%) for those from abroad.
δ13Cbulk values for the investigated samples are presented in Figure 3.
The isotopic signature of 13C in terrestrial plants varies depending on their photosynthetic pathway. There are two primary types of photosynthesis, C3 (Calvin cycle) and C4 (Hatch-Slack cycle), which are distinguished by the enzyme involved in the initial carboxylation step and the number of carbon atoms in the first stable compound formed (three for C3 plants and four for C4 plants) [12]. The C3 pathway is found in most plant species on our planet (vegetables, fruits, and the majority of cereals) and exhibits 13C values ranging from −30 to −23‰. In contrast, C4 plants such as maize, sugarcane, millet, and sorghum have higher 13C isotopic signatures, typically between −14‰ and −12‰.
δ13Cbulk values of Romanian samples ranged from −30.0 to −23.3‰ (mean of −25.9‰), and this variation interval was consistent with that of C3 plants [26]. While the mean values of samples from Hungary (−26.7‰), Greece (−26.9‰), France (−27.5‰), Italy (−28.0‰), Poland (−26.0‰), Germany (−27.2‰), and Egypt (−28.0‰) were numerically lower (more negative) than that of the Romanian samples, the standard deviations of these groups overlap. It can be observed that there is a general trend of slightly less negative δ13C values in Romanian samples than those of the other countries, as the differences were not statistically significant due to the large overlap in variability. A Kruskal–Wallis test was conducted in order to detect differences among different countries. The p value was 0.001. Even if the 13C isotopic compositions are strongly related to the photosynthetic pathway, the differences in the 13Cbulk isotopic fingerprint of potato samples across countries could also be assigned to variations in local growing conditions, such as precipitation quantity, the mean annual temperature, relative humidity, and nutrient availability [77]. Opatic et al. [26] reported a mean value of −25.0‰ for potato samples from a macro-region (Alpine) in Slovenia, a value that is similar to that obtained for Romanian investigated samples (−25.9‰). In addition to environmental factors (precipitation, temperature, and relative humidity), the varietal characteristics of potatoes may also influence δ13C values. Previous studies on various agricultural products (e.g., pistachios [78], apples [79], and hazelnuts [80]) have demonstrated significant isotopic variation attributable to cultivar differences. In our study, the analyzed potato samples included both red- and white-skinned varieties, and this varietal diversity could contribute to the observed isotopic differences across countries.

3.3. Chemometric Results

For statistical interpretation, some of the analyzed elements were removed from the initial data set, such as Be, Sc, Ge, Zr, Pd, Ag, Te, Cs, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, Hf, Ta, W, Re, Os, Ir, Bi, Th, and U. For the LDA method, Wilks Lambda was chosen for measuring the similarity among analyzed potatoes samples. Thus, for geographical classification, each sample received one of the following codes corresponding to its origin: code 1 for Romanian samples or code 2 for foreign samples.
The percentage obtained for each initial classification was 89.0%, while for cross-validation it was 82.0%. Significant markers were δ13Cbulk, δ2Hwater, and Sr. When LDA is computed, some linear discriminant functions are compiled, and significant markers (selected among measured characteristics) have different coefficients. In our case, the selected markers δ13C, δ2H, and Sr had coefficients of 0.422, 1.001, and 0.843, respectively.
From the classification results, it could be observed that the five samples of Romanian origin were placed into the foreign group, and six foreign samples were put in the Romanian group. The graphical representation of potato samples according to origin is presented in Figure 4.
The classification of potato function by their skin color (white and red) is presented in Figure 5. This association between ICP-MS and IRMS might not be the most suitable instrument for fulfilling the purpose of differentiating between skin colors. The analyzed potatoes presented similar isotopic and multi-element contents, and significant differences could not be observed. Future studies might imply other analytical techniques capable of better classifying the potatoes according to skin color.

4. Conclusions

In this study, 100 potato samples were investigated from the elemental and isotopic point of view, using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and isotope ratio mass spectrometry. The quantitative contribution of macro-elements represented more than 80% of all minerals. The decrease in concentrations of the potato sample was in the order of K > P > Mg > Ca > Na. The content of toxic metals (As, Cd, Pb, Hg) in the analyzed foodstuffs was low, and they can be safely consumed. The isotopic results of these vegetables support the mention on the label that many potato samples were imported from different countries for the Romanian market. Chemometrics were used to highlight the most important features able to predict the geographical origin of potatoes. The best predictors for geographical differentiation of potato samples were δ13Cbulk, δ2Hwater, and Sr. Unfortunately, the differentiation according to potato skin color could not be performed using available analytical parameters, and this represents a good challenge for future studies in this direction. The results of this study may provide useful baseline data on the variations of some elements in Romanian and commercially available imported vegetables and may initiate further studies on the nutritional and toxicological effects of the commercially available foodstuffs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.V., G.C., and I.F.; methodology, C.V. and R.P.; software, I.F.; validation, I.F., R.P., and A.M.I.; formal analysis, C.V., G.C., and R.P.; investigation, C.V. and G.C.; resources, G.C.; data curation, I.F. and A.M.I.; writing—original draft preparation, C.V., G.C., and I.F.; writing—review and editing, C.V., G.C., and I.F.; visualization, I.F.; supervision, G.C.; project administration, G.C.; funding acquisition, G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the MCID through the “Nucleu” Programe within the National Plan for Research, Development, and Innovation 2022–2027, Contract No. 27N/2023, PN 23 24 03 01.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ICP-MSInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
IRMSIsotope ratio mass spectrometry
LDALinear discriminant analysis

References

  1. Bozan, I.; Achakkagari, S.R.; Anglin, N.L.; Ellis, D.; Tai, H.H.; Strömvik, M. Pangenome analyses reveal impact of transposable elements and ploidy on the evolution of potato species. Plant Biol. 2023, 120, e2211117120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. FAO. FAOSTAT Statistical Database; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2022; Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat (accessed on 22 May 2025).
  3. Hosseinian, M.; Kafi, M.; Nabati, J.; Oskoueian, A. Effect of Application of Signaling Compounds on the Remobilization of Assimilates and the Leaf Senescence Induction Process in Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Potato Res. 2025, 68, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lei, X.; Xu, X.; Zhou, S. Potato Yield Prediction Research Based on Improved Artificial Neural Networks Using Whale Optimization Algorithm. Potato Res. 2024, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mølmann, J.A.B.; Johansen, T.J. Influence of Growth Temperature on Development and Yield in a Medium Late and a Late Scandinavian Cultivar of Potato. Potato Res. 2025, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Devaux, A.; Goffart, J.-P.; Petsakos, A.; Kromann, P.; Gatto, M.; Okello, J.; Suarez, V.; Hareau, G. Global Food Security, Contributions from Sustainable Potato Agri-Food Systems. In The Potato Crop; Campos, H., Ortiz, O., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zaheer, K.; Akhtar, M.H. Potato production, usage, and nutrition—A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 711–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pandey, J.; Gautam, S.; Scheuring, D.C.; Koym, J.W.; Vales, M.I. Variation and genetic basis of mineral content in potato tubers and prospects for genomic selection. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1301297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Andrivon, D. Potato facing global challenges: How, how much, how well? Potato Res. 2017, 60, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Devaux, A.; Goffart, J.-P.; Kromann, P.; Andrade-Piedra, J.; Polar, V.; Hareau, G. The Potato of the Future: Opportunities and Challenges in Sustainable Agri-food Systems. Potato Res. 2021, 64, 681–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Cristea, G.; Voica, C.; Feher, I.; Puscas, R.; Magdas, D.A. Isotopic and elemental characterization of Romanian pork meat in corroboration with advanced chemometric methods: A first exploratory study. Meat Sci. 2022, 189, 108825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Camin, F.; Bontempo, L.; Perini, M.; Piasentier, E. Stable Isotope Ratio Analysis for Assessing the Authenticity of Food of Animal Origin. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2016, 15, 868–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kanrar, B.; Kundu, S.; Khan, P.; Jain, V. Elemental Profiling for Discrimination of Geographical Origin of Tea (Camellia sinensis) in north-east region of India by ICP-MS coupled with Chemometric techniques. Food Chem. Adv. 2022, 1, 100073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Coelho, I.; Matos, A.S.; Epova, E.N.; Barre, J.; Cellier, R.; Ogrinc, N.; Castanheira, I.; Bordado, J.; Donard, O.F.X. Multi-element and multi-isotopic profiles of Port and Douro wines as tracers for authenticity. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2023, 115, 104988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mulaudzi, N.; Combrinck, S.; Vermaak, I.; Joubert, E.; Viljoen, A. High performance thin layer chromatography fingerprinting of rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) and honeybush (Cyclopia genistoides, Cyclopia intermedia and Cyclopia subternata) teas. J. App. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2022, 30, 100378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yan, S.; Song, M.; Wang, K.; Fang, X.; Peng, W.; Wu, L.; Xue, X. Detection of acacia honey adulteration with high fructose corn syrup through determination of targeted α-Dicarbonyl compound using ion mobility-mass spectrometry coupled with UHPLC-MS/MS. Food Chem. 2021, 352, 129312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dua, A.; Bahman, S.; Kelly, S.; Dogra, S.; Sharma, K. Authentication of Indian Honey Based on Carbon Stable Isotope Ratio Analysis—Verification of Indian Regulatory Criteria. Foods 2025, 14, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, Y.; Mei, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, M.; Huan, Z.; Nie, J.; Rogers, K.M.; Nuralykyzy, B.; Li, C.; Yuan, Y. Application of Stable Isotopes and Multi Elemental Fingerprints to Verify the Origin of Premium Chinese Hainan Bananas. Foods 2025, 14, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Xiong, C.; Wang, Q.; Xu, J. Tracing the geographical origin of grain vinegar using the stable isotope ratio mass spectrometry and chemometrics. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2023, 123, 105554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Y.-Y.; Zhang, P.; Le, M.-M.; Qi, Y.; Yang, Z.; Hu, F.-L.; Ling, T.J.; Bao, G.H. Improving flavor of summer Keemun black tea by solid-state fermentation using Cordyceps militaris revealed by LC/MS-based metabolomics and GC/MS analysis. Food Chem. 2023, 407, 135172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Salzano, A.; Manganiello, G.; Neglia, G.; Vinale, F.; De Nicola, D.; D’Occhio, M.; Campanile, G. A preliminary study on metabolome profiles of buffalo milk and corresponding mozzarella cheese: Safeguarding the authenticity and traceability of protected status buffalo dairy products. Molecules 2020, 25, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tömösközi-Farkas, R.; Adányi, N.; Gasztonyi-Nagy, M.; Berki, M.; Horváth, V.; Renkecz, T.; Simon, K.; Fabulya, Z.; Polgár, Z. Changes of Metabolites and Macro- and Micro-elements in Hungarian Potatoes under Organic and Conventional Farming. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. B 2016, 6, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Flemotomou, E.; Molyviatis, T.; Zabetakis, I. The Effect of Trace Elements Accumulation on the Levels of Secondary Metabolites and Antioxidant Activity in Carrots, Onions and Potatoes. Food Nutr. Sci. 2011, 2, 1071–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Galdón, B.R.; Rodríguez, L.H.; Mesa, D.R.; León, H.L.; Pérez, N.L.; Rodríguez, E.M.; Romero, C.D. Differentiation of potato cultivars experimentally cultivated based on their chemical composition and by applying linear discriminant analysis. Food Chem. 2012, 133, 1241–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Latorre, C.H.; Garcia, J.B.; Martin, S.G.; Peña Crecente, R.M. Chemometric Classification of Potatoes with Protected Designation of Origin According to Their Producing Area and Variety. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 8444–8451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Opatić, A.M.; Nečemer, M.; Budič, B.; Lojen, S. Stable isotope analysis of major bioelements, multi-element profiling, and discriminant analysis for geographical origins of organically grown potato. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2018, 71, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brand, W.A.; Coplen, T.B.; Vogl, J.; Rosner, M.; Prohaska, T. Assessment of international reference materials for stable isotope ratio analysis 2013 (IUPAC). Pure Appl. Chem. 2014, 86, 425–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Coplen, T.B. Guidelines and Recommended Terms for Expression of Stable-Isotope-Ratio and Gas-Ratio Measurement Results. Rapid Commun. Mass. Spectrom. 2011, 25, 2538–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Leonel, M.; Do Carmo, E.L.; Fernandes, A.M.; Soratto, R.P.; Ebúrneo, J.A.M.; Garcia, É.L.; Dos Santos, T.P.R. Chemical composition of potato tubers: The effect of cultivars and growth conditions. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 54, 2372–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, L.; Mu, T.; Ma, M.; Zhang, R.; Sun, Q.; Xu, Y. Nutritional evaluation of different cultivars of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) from China by grey relational analysis (GRA) and its application in potato steamed bread making. J. Integre. Agric. 2019, 18, 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wekesa, M.; Okoth, M.; Abong’, G.; Muthoni, J.; Kabira, J. Effect of soil characteristics on potato tuber minerals composition of selected Kenyan varieties. J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 6, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Andre, C.M.; Ghislain, M.; Bertin, P.; Oufir, M.; del Rosario Herrera, M.; Hoffmann, L.; Hausman, J.-F.; Larondelle, Y.; Evers, D. Andean Potato Cultivars (Solanum tuberosum L.) as a Source of Antioxidant and Mineral Micronutrients. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 366–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Peña, C.; Restrepo-Sánchez, L.-P.; Kushalappa, A.; Rodríguez-Molano, L.-E.; Mosquera, T.; Narváez-Cuenca, C.-E. Nutritional contents of advanced breeding clones of Solanum tuberosum group Phureja. LWT 2015, 62, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Singh, B.; Sharma, J.; Bhardwaj, V.; Sood, S.; Siddappa, S.; Goutam, U.; Dalamu, D.; Kardile, H.; Dipta, B.; Pandey, N.K. Variations in the mineral concentration among different potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) accessions. Potato J. 2022, 48, 99–107. [Google Scholar]
  35. Subramanian, N.K.; White, P.J.; Broadley, M.R.; Ramsay, G. Variation in tuber mineral concentrations among accessions of Solanum species held in the commonwealth potato collection. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2017, 64, 1927–1935. [Google Scholar]
  36. Oosterhuis, D.M.; Loka, D.A.; Kawakami, E.M.; Pettigrew, W.T. Chapter Three—The Physiology of Potassium in Crop Production. In Advances in Agronomy; Sparks, D.L., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; Volume 126, pp. 203–233. [Google Scholar]
  37. Torabian, S.; Farhangi-Abriz, S.; Qin, R.; Noulas, C.; Sathuvalli, V.; Charlton, B.; Loka, D.A. Potassium: A Vital Macronutrient in Potato Production—A Review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khan, M.Z.; Akhtar, M.E.; Mahmood-ul-Hassan, M.; Mahmood, M.M.; Safdar, M.N. Potato tuber yield and quality as affected by rates and sources of potassium fertilizer. J. Plant Nutr. 2012, 35, 664–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, S.; Duan, Y.; Guo, T.; Zhang, P.; He, P.; Johnston, A.; Shcherbakov, A. Potassium management in potato production in Northwest region of China. Field Crops Res. 2015, 174, 48–54. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wegener, C.B.; Jurgens, H.-U.; Jansen, G. Drought stress affects bioactive compounds in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) relevant to non-communicable diseases. Funct. Foods Health Dis. 2017, 7, 17–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hopkins, B.G.; Fernelius, K.J.; Hansen, N.C.; Eggett, D.L. AVAIL phosphorus fertilizer enhancer: Meta-analysis of 503 field evaluations. Agron. J. 2018, 110, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bruulsema, T.W.; Peterson, H.M.; Prochnow, L.I. The science of 4R nutrient stewardship for phosphorus management across latitudes. J. Environ. Qual. 2019, 48, 1295–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Faucon, M.-P.; Houben, D.; Reynoird, J.-P.; Mercadal-Dulaurent, A.M.; Armand, R.; Lambers, H. Advances and Perspectives to Improve the Phosphorus Availability in Cropping Systems for Agroecological Phosphorus Management. In Advances in Agronomy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 134, pp. 51–79. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hailu, G.; Nigussie, D.; Ali, M.; Derbew, B. Nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiency in improved potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars in southern Ethiopia. Am. J. Potato Res. 2017, 94, 617–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rosen, C.J.; Kelling, K.A.; Stark, J.C.; Porter, G.A. Optimizing phosphorus fertilizer management in potato production. Am. J. Potato Res. 2014, 91, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hopkins, B.G.; Hansen, N.C. Phosphorus Management in High-Yield Systems. J. Environ. Qual. 2019, 48, 1265–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jasim, A.; Sharma, L.K.; Zaeen, A.; Bali, S.K.; Buzza, A.; Alyokhin, A. Potato Phosphorus Response in Soils with High Value of Phosphorus. Agriculture 2020, 10, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Thor, K. Calcium—Nutrient and messenger. Front. Plant Sci.: Sec. Plant Nutr. 2019, 10, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Polyakova, M. The Importance of Magnesium for Potato Production: A Comprehensive Guide. Available online: https://potatoes.news/the-importance-of-magnesium-for-potato-production-a-comprehensive-guide/Daily-News (accessed on 13 March 2025).
  50. Tamasi, G.; Cambi, M.; Gaggelli, N.; Autino, A.; Cresti, M.; Cini, R. The content of selected minerals and vitamin C for potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) from the high Tiber Valley area, southeast Tuscany. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2015, 41, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lal, M.K.; Kumar, A.; Jena, R.; Raigond, P.; Kumar, D.; Thakur, N.; Singh, B. Minerals in potato. In Potato; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 87–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Orellana, E.; Bastos, M.; Cuadrado, W.; Zárate, R.; Sarapura, V.; Yallico, L.; Tabra, F.; Bao, D. Heavy Metals in Native Potato and Health Risk Assessment in Highland Andean Zones of Junín, Peru. J. Environ. Prot. 2020, 11, 921–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ozturk, E.; Atsan, E.; Polat, T.; Kara, K. Variation in heavy metal concentrations of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2011, 21, 235–239. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gunko, S.; Vakuliuk, P.; Naumenko, О.; Bober, А.; Boroday, V.; Nasikovskyi, V.; Muliar, О. The Mineral Composition of Potatoes and Its Influence on the Darkening of Tubers Pulp. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 17, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Šrek, P.; Hejcman, M.; Kunzová, E. Multivariate analysis of relationship between potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yield, amount of applied elements, their concentrations in tubers and uptake in a long-term fertilizer experiment. Field Crops Res. 2010, 118, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gebrekidan, A.; Weldegebriel, Y.; Hadera, A.; Vander, B. Toxicological assessment of heavy metals accumulated in vegetables and fruits grown in Ginfel river near Sheba Tannery, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 95, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Millaleo, R.; Reyes-Díaz, M.; Ivanov, A.G.; Mora, M.L.; Alberdi, M. Manganese as essential and toxic element for plants: Transport, accumulation and resistance mechanisms. J. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 2010, 10, 470–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sarkar, D.; Pandey, S.K.; Sud, K.C.; Chanemougasoundharam, A. In vitro characterization of manganese toxicity in relation to phosphorus nutrition in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant Sci. 2004, 167, 977–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bedoya-Perales, N.S.; Maus, D.; Neimaier, A.; Escobedo-Pacheco, E.; Pumi, G. Assessment of the variation of heavy metals and pesticide residues in native and modern potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars grown at different altitudes in a typical mining region in Peru. Toxicol. Rep. 2023, 11, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Polyakova, M. Unveiling the Hidden Potential of Rubidium: Revolutionizing Potato Farming for Improved Crop Performance. Available online: https://potatoes.news/unveiling-the-hidden-potential-of-rubidium-revolutionizing-potato-farming-for-improved-crop-performance/Daily-News (accessed on 20 April 2025).
  61. Qiu, N.; Tian, L.; Yan, X.; Dong, H.; Zhang, M.; Han, G.; Zhou, F. The Interplay between Calcium and Strontium in Chinese Cabbage under Normal and Low Calcium Conditions. Hort. Sci. 2021, 56, 875–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, W.R.; Kang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Qiu, N.W.; Chen, M.; Zhou, F. The biological effects of strontium (88Sr) on Chinese cabbage. Plant Soil. Environ. 2020, 66, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sowa, I.; Woìjciak-Kosior, M.; Strzemski, M.; Dresler, S.; Szwerc, W.; Blicharski, T.; Szymczak, G.; Kocjan, R. Biofortification of soy (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) with strontium ions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 5248–5252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wójciak-Kosior, M.; Sowa, I.; Blicharski, T.; Strzemski, M.; Dresler, S.; Szymczak, G.; Wnorowski, A.; Kocjan, R.; Świeboda, R. The Stimulatory effect of strontium ions on phytoestrogens content in Glycine max (L.) Merr. Molecules 2016, 21, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dresler, S.; Wójciak-Kosior, M.; Sowa, I.; Strzemski, M.; Sawicki, J.; Kováčik, J.; Blicharski, T. Effect of Long-Term Strontium Exposure on the Content of Phytoestrogens and Allantoin in Soybean. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jovanović, P.; Rachmilevitch, S.; Roitman, N.; Erel, R. Strontium as a tracer for calcium: Uptake, transport and partitioning within tomato plants. Plant Soil. 2021, 466, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. De Roma, A.; Abete, M.C.; Brizio, P.; Picazio, G.; Caiazzo, M.; D’auria, L.G.; Esposito, M. Evaluation of Trace Elements in Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) from a Suburban Area of Naples, Italy: The “Triangle of Death”. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 1167–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. FAO; WHO. Codex General Standard for Contamination and Toxins in Food and Feed; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; Available online: https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCXS%2B193-1995%252FCXS_193e.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  69. Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on Maximum Levels For Certain Contaminants In Food And Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/915/oj/eng (accessed on 20 January 2025).
  70. Karan, Y.B. Mineral nutrient variability of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers with different colors grown in Niksar, Kazova and Artova locations of Tokat Province, Turkey. Peer J. 2023, 11, e15262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Sharma, J.; Kumar, S.; Sharma, V.; Luthra, S.K.; Sharma, A.K.; Dua, V.K. Mineral content of red skinned potatoes of Eastern India. J. Hortic. Sci. 2019, 14, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Magdas, D.A.; Dehelean, A.; Feher, I.; Radu, S. Isotopic and multielemental fingerprinting of organically and conventionally grown potatoes. Isot. Enviro. Health. Stud. 2017, 53, 610–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bowen, G.J.; Ehleringer, J.R.; Chesson, L.A.; Stange, E.; Cerling, T.E. Stable isotope ratios of tap water in the contiguous United States. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kalpage, M.; Dissanayake, C.; Diyabalanage, S.; Chandrajith, R.; Frew, R.; Fernando, R. Stable Isotope and Element Profiling for Determining the Agroclimatic Origin of Cow Milk within a Tropical Country. Foods 2022, 11, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Fontanesi, L. Chapter 19—Meat Authenticity and Traceability. In Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, Lawrie´s Meat Science, 8th ed.; Toldra´, F., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2017; pp. 585–633. [Google Scholar]
  76. Dehelean, A.; Feher, I.; Romulus, P.; Magdas, D.A.; Covaciu, F.-D.; Kasza, A.M.; Curean, V.; Cristea, G. Influence of Geographical Origin on Isotopic and Elemental Compositions of Pork Meat. Foods 2023, 12, 4271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chung, I.-M.; Kim, J.-K.; Jin, Y.-I.; Oh, Y.-T.; Prabakaran, M.; Youn, K.-J.; Kim, S.-H. Discriminative study of a potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivation region by measuring the stable isotope ratios of bio-elements. Food Chem. 2016, 212, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Anderson, K.A.; Smith, B.W. Effect of Season and Variety on the Differentiation of Geographic Growing Origin of Pistachios by Stable Isotope Profiling. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 1747–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mimmo, T.; Camin, F.; Bontempo, L.; Capici, C.; Tagliavini, M.; Cesco, S.; Scampicchio, M. Traceability of different apple varieties by multivariate analysis of isotope ratio mass spectrometry data. Rapid Commun. Mass. Spectrom. 2015, 29, 1984–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sammarco, G.; Rossi, M.; Suman, M.; Cavanna, D.; Viotto, L.; Pettenà, P.; Dall, C.; Iacumin, P. Hazelnut products traceability through combined isotope ratio mass spectrometry and multi-elemental analysis. JSFA Rep. 2023, 3, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Potato sample after the step of water extraction.
Figure 1. Potato sample after the step of water extraction.
Foods 14 02440 g001
Figure 2. Isotopic fingerprint (δ2H versus δ18O) for studied potatoes.
Figure 2. Isotopic fingerprint (δ2H versus δ18O) for studied potatoes.
Foods 14 02440 g002
Figure 3. Isotopic fingerprint (δ13Cbulk) for studied potatoes. The circle represents the outliers and the cross symbol is the mean of data.
Figure 3. Isotopic fingerprint (δ13Cbulk) for studied potatoes. The circle represents the outliers and the cross symbol is the mean of data.
Foods 14 02440 g003
Figure 4. Geographical classification of potato samples (Romanian and foreign).
Figure 4. Geographical classification of potato samples (Romanian and foreign).
Foods 14 02440 g004
Figure 5. Classification of potato function by their skin color (white and red).
Figure 5. Classification of potato function by their skin color (white and red).
Foods 14 02440 g005
Table 1. Comparative reported values for the investigated macro-elements in studied potatoes: this study versus other references.
Table 1. Comparative reported values for the investigated macro-elements in studied potatoes: this study versus other references.
References U.M.Elements
NaMgPKCa
This study (range, mean)g/kg0.004–1.096 (0.087)0.475–5.4 (1.109)0.612–4.161 (1.707)5.994–23.412 (13.742)0.087–3.131 (0.453)
[30]g/kg0.141–0.3331.134–1.453-21.943–28.220.341–0.712
[8]g/kg0.102–0.468 (0.276)0.81–1.44 (1.14)2.96–4.79 (3.69)20.39–32.46 (25.09)0.19–0.79 (0.44)
[31]g/kg-0.38–8.00 3.15–4.95 12.95-26.60 0.02-1.00
[32]g/kg----0.271–1.092
[33]g/kg0.007-0.12 0.95–1.07 1.62–2.20 19.63–24.66 0.10–0.15 
[34]g/kg-0.4–2.91.3–3.94.8–20.10.20–1.0
[35]g/kg-0.8–2.22.4–5.215.0–26.90.1–0.7
Table 2. Comparative reported values for the investigated microelements in studied potatoes: this study versus other references.
Table 2. Comparative reported values for the investigated microelements in studied potatoes: this study versus other references.
ReferencesU.M.Elements
FeZnCuCrNiMn
This study (range, mean)mg/kg16.981–255.792 (73.659)1.779–33.642 (9.344)<0.001–55.544 (4.580)<0.001–21.455 (3.80)<0.001–13.610 (2.9612.412–54.627 (7.467)
[31]mg/kg118.5–615.5 17.4–78.1 1.1–13.5--11.1–83.7
[54]mg/kg208.9–380.534.4–54.08.9–13.52.8–7.816.8–45.516.8–45.5
[55]mg/kg-16.14.30.190.58-
[56]mg/kg-1.42.520.390.25-
[59]mg/kg--0.970–1.534--1.086–15.145
[53]mg/kg48.87–72.6413.80–18.883.07–5.43-2.02–3.557.20–13.06
[52]mg/kg5.25–200.67 (94.531)13.03–26.41 (18.251)----
[33]mg/kg18.0–24.013.0–15.02.0–3.0--6.0–8.0
[34]mg/kg23.60–76.906.80–36.03.80–23.10--7.20–28.40
[35]mg/kg12.2–43.65.9–26.92.6–10.8--3.9–11.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Voica, C.; Feher, I.; Puscas, R.; Iordache, A.M.; Cristea, G. Elemental and Isotopic Fingerprints of Potatoes. Foods 2025, 14, 2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142440

AMA Style

Voica C, Feher I, Puscas R, Iordache AM, Cristea G. Elemental and Isotopic Fingerprints of Potatoes. Foods. 2025; 14(14):2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142440

Chicago/Turabian Style

Voica, Cezara, Ioana Feher, Romulus Puscas, Andreea Maria Iordache, and Gabriela Cristea. 2025. "Elemental and Isotopic Fingerprints of Potatoes" Foods 14, no. 14: 2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142440

APA Style

Voica, C., Feher, I., Puscas, R., Iordache, A. M., & Cristea, G. (2025). Elemental and Isotopic Fingerprints of Potatoes. Foods, 14(14), 2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142440

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop