Next Article in Journal
A Non-Destructive Detection and Grading Method of the Internal Quality of Preserved Eggs Based on an Improved ConvNext
Previous Article in Journal
Postbiotic of Pediococcus acidilactici GQ01, a Novel Probiotic Strain Isolated from Natural Fermented Wolfberry, Attenuates Hyperuricaemia in Mice through Modulating Uric Acid Metabolism and Gut Microbiota
Previous Article in Special Issue
Insights into the Mechanisms of Reuterin against Staphylococcus aureus Based on Membrane Damage and Untargeted Metabolomics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum A72, a Strain with Antioxidant Properties, Obtained through ARTP Mutagenesis, Affects Caenorhabditis elegans Anti-Aging

SKL of Marine Food Processing & Safety Control, National Engineering Research Center of Seafood, Collaborative Innovation Center of Provincial and Ministerial Co-Construction for Deep Processing, Collaborative Innovation Center of Seafood Deep Processing, School of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(6), 924; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13060924
Submission received: 15 February 2024 / Revised: 2 March 2024 / Accepted: 13 March 2024 / Published: 19 March 2024

Abstract

:
This research endeavored to elucidate the antioxidant attributes of lactic acid bacteria, specifically their impact on anti-aging and lifespan augmentation in Caenorhabditis elegans. The study focused on Lactiplantibacillus plantarum A72, identified through ARTP mutagenesis for its potent antioxidant properties. In vitro analysis affirmed its free radical neutralizing capacity. In C. elegans, the strain not only extended the lifespan by 25.13% and amplified motility 2.52-fold, but also maintained reproductive capabilities. Remarkably, Lpb. plantarum A72 diminished reactive oxygen species (ROS) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in C. elegans by 34.86% and 69.52%, respectively, while concurrently enhancing its antioxidant enzyme activities. The strain also bolstered C. elegans survival rates by 46.33% and 57.78% under high temperature and H2O2 conditions, respectively. Transcriptomic scrutiny revealed that Lpb. plantarum A72 could retard C. elegans aging and extend lifespan by upregulating the sod-5 and hsp-16.1 genes and downregulating the fat-6 and lips-17 genes. These findings propose Lpb. plantarum A72 as a potential antioxidant and anti-aging lactic acid bacteria.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Aging is a complex biological process, mediated by both genetic and environmental factors [1]. In most cases, aging-related diseases and programmed cell death are primarily caused by cellular oxidative stress [2]. In order to ameliorate the aging-related diseases that accompany the process of increasing human longevity, the focus is increasingly on promoting a healthy lifespan based on slowing down aging. Improving the body’s oxidative stress capacity through diet is an effective way to fight aging.
There is mounting evidence that naturally occurring active microorganisms like lactic acid bacteria (LAB) possess potent antioxidant activity. These microorganisms have probiotic potential, including intestinal flora balance, body immunity regulation, anti-cellular senescence and antioxidant activity [3,4]. Among LAB, one of the more versatile and promising species is Lactiplantibacillus plantarum. Using Lpb. plantarum J26 to ferment blueberry juice, Zhang et al., 2021 discovered that fermentation had the effect of reducing oxidative damage in a Caco-2 cell model and greatly increased the scavenging ability of DPPH, superoxide anion radicals, and hydroxyl radicals [5]. Pan found that Lpb. plantarum KFY02 was able to convert geniposide into genipin, which reduced CCl4-induced liver injury in mice through the ability to enhance the antioxidant capacity of the organism. Although the antioxidant effects of Lpb. plantarum microbiota have been demonstrated in several studies, reports on its aging-delaying effects and related mechanisms are rare [6].
Caenorhabditis elegans is a model organism widely used in the field of biomedicine, with the advantages of a short life cycle, a transparent body and ease of observation [7]. Its unique characteristics have made it the perfect model for a variety of studies: its small size for simple culture, its transparent body for simple labeling and observation, hermaphroditism for high fertility and experimental embryos or offspring samples, a short life cycle for quick lab research, and a distinct genetic background for comprehending referential mechanisms. In recent years, C. elegans has been widely used to study diseases related to antioxidation, anti-aging, etc. Li et al., 2022 investigated the antioxidant capacity of Laminaria japonica polysaccharide with C. elegans, and found that polysaccharides could enhance the expression of antioxidant enzymes and reduce the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in C. elegans [8]. Sun et al., 2023 investigated the anti-aging effects of polysaccharides extracted from ginsenoside residues (GRP) with C. elegans, and found that polysaccharides could enhance the antioxidant activity in C. elegans, thereby avoiding oxidative damage and extending their lifespan [9]. However, the specific antioxidant, anti-aging, and lifespan extension mechanisms of microorganisms (e.g., LAB) on C. elegans are unclear.
In this paper, Lpb. plantarum A72 with antioxidant capacity was screened by Atmospheric and Room Temperature Plasma (ARTP) mutagenesis. After that, we used C. elegans as a model to evaluate the effects of the molecular mechanism of Lpb. plantarum A72 extract on anti-aging. Specifically, we studied the physiological conditions, resistance to environmental factors, antioxidant enzyme activities and transcriptome sequencing of C. elegans. Eventually, the mechanism for the lifespan extension of C. elegans with the addition of Lpb. plantarum A72 was discussed. Our present investigation may accelerate the utilization of Lpb. plantarum A72 as a potential dietary supplement to retard age-related diseases and enhance health span.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Lpb. plantarum SC3 was selected from Chinese fermented vegetables (Dalian, China) and was stored in our lab [10]. Lpb. plantarum SC3 was used as the original strain and the ARTP (ARTP Mutagenesis Breeding Machine, ARTP-IIS, Tmaxtree, Wuxi, China) technique was used to generate mutant strains with high antioxidant capacity. After hydrogen peroxide tolerance evaluations, Lpb. plantarum A72 with the highest antioxidant capacity was selected from 149 strains. Caenorhabditis elegans N2 (wild-type) and Escherichia coli strain OP50 were purchased from SunyBiotech (Fuzhou, China).
Total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD), catalase (CAT) and malondialdehyde (MDA) kits were purchased from the Nanjing Jiancheng Institute of Biological Engineering (Nanjing, China).

2.2. Preparation of Cell-Free Supernatant (CFS), Intact Cells (IC), and Cell-Free Extracts (CFE) from Lpb. plantarum

Lpb. plantarum was cultivated in MRS broth at 37 °C for 24 h and adjusted to 109 CFU/mL. Following a 10 min centrifugation at 4 °C and 6000 rpm, the supernatant was measured and recorded as CFS. The precipitate was resuspended after being washed three times with 0.85% (w/v) saline; one portion was labeled as IC, and the other was broken up by ultrasonication, centrifuged, and the supernatant was removed and labeled as CFE.

2.3. Free Radical Scavenging Capacity Assay of Lpb. plantarum

The 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)-scavenging activities, superoxide anion radical-scavenging activities, hydroxyl radical-scavenging activities and the 2-phenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-2,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-1-oxyl 3-N-oxide (PTIO)-radical-scavenging activities of Lpb. plantarum SC3 and Lpb. plantarum A72 were analyzed as described by Wang et al., 2022 [11], Li et al., 2021 [12], Li et al., 2021 [13] and Li et al., 2017 [14], respectively. As a control, 0.1 mg/mL Vitamin C (VC) solution was prepared. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

2.4. C. elegans Culture Conditions

The C. elegans were lysed with a ready-to-use cell lysis solution [15], then centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 1 min to obtain the eggs, and finally washed with M9 buffer to exhaust the cell lysate. The eggs were transferred to Nematode Growth Medium (NGM) and incubated at 25 °C for 48 h and then developed into L4 stage larvae.
E. coli OP50 was cultured and suspended in saline to OD600 = 0.6. Lpb. plantarum A72 resuspended in the above E. coli OP50 solution to 105, 107 and 109 CFU/mL were used as the experimental group. VC was diluted in OP50 solution to 0.1 mg/mL and used as the positive control. The OP50 resuspension group was used as a negative control group. For each group, 200 μL of the solution was spread on NGM medium as C. elegans food for three parallels, and cultivated at 25 °C [15].

2.5. Effects of Lpb. plantarum A72 Addition on the Physiological Conditions of C. elegans

2.5.1. Effect of Lpb. plantarum A72 Addition on the Lifespan of C. elegans

Thirty L4 stage C. elegans were transferred to NGM dishes and placed in an incubator at 25 °C to measure their lifespan according to Zhao et al., 2023 [15]. The survival of C. elegans was counted every 24 h from the date of transfer to a new NGM dish.
In the absence of any response from C. elegans, the head of C. elegans was touched and the number of C. elegans deaths was counted until all C. elegans were dead.

2.5.2. Effect of Lpb. plantarum A72 Addition on the Reproductive Capacity of C. elegans

The reproductive capacity was carried out with L4 stage C. elegans on NGM (five per plate) [16]. They were changed to a new medium to ensure adequate nutrients for every 24 h, and the process continued for 7 days. The number of C. elegans eggs on the media was counted each day. The number of progeny was recorded as the total number of eggs per C. elegans.

2.5.3. Effect of Lpb. plantarum A72 Addition on the Head Swing of C. elegans

The head swing of C. elegans was used to determine its mobility, and its head swing was quantified in accordance with Wang et al., 2023 [17]. After 48 h of administration, the number of head swings was counted for 30 s each time. The experiment was repeated three times with at least 30 C. elegans per group.

2.6. Resistance of C. elegans to Environmental Factors with Lpb. plantarum Supplement

The effect of Lpb. plantarum A72 on C. elegans resistance to environmentally induced oxidative damage was measured according to Wang’s study [18].

2.6.1. Effect of Lpb. plantarum on the Survival Rate of C. elegans under Thermal Shock

The L4 C. elegans in each group were cultured for 48 h, and then transferred to an incubator at 35 °C. After heat treatment for 4 h, the survival rate was calculated. The heads of C. elegans were touched and if there was no response, C. elegans were considered dead.

2.6.2. Effect of Lpb. plantarum on the Survival Rate of C. elegans Stimulated by H2O2

The L4 C. elegans in each group were cultured for 48 h, and then transferred to NGM petri dishes containing 10 mM H2O2 and cultured for 4 h at 25 °C. After that, the survival rate was calculated. C. elegans’ death was judged as previously described.

2.7. Determination of the Antioxidant Enzyme Activities, MDA Levels and ROS Accumulation of C. elegans with Lpb. plantarum Supplement

The C. elegans were washed three times with M9 buffer then crushed by an ultrasonic wave to obtain a suspension. The total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD), catalase (CAT) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels of C. elegans were measured according to the kits’ instructions. The ROS accumulation of C. elegans was measured as described by Li et al. [19] with infinite F200 PRO (TECAN, Zürich, Switzerland).

2.8. Transcriptome Sequencing of C. elegans

Total RNA was extracted from at least 2000 C. elegans samples with an MJZol total RNA extraction kit (Majorbio, Shanghai, China). The concentration and purity of the extracted RNA were examined using Nanodrop2000 (Thermo Fisher Sci, Pleasanton, CA, USA), and after the quality was qualified, the library was constructed using Illumina® Stranded mRNA Prep, Ligation from Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina, CA, USA) platform.
Adapters were removed from the obtained data, and clean data were obtained after removing the low-quality reads, and comparing them with the reference genome (Caenorhabditis elegans WBcel235: https://metazoa.ensembl.org/Caenorhabditis_elegans/Info/Index (accessed on 1 July 2023). The expression levels of the genes were quantified using the software RSEM (http://deweylab.github.io/RSEM/ (accessed on 1 July 2023) and processed by DEGseq (https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/DEGseq (accessed on 1 July 2023) to screen for significantly differentially expressed genes, setting the default screening criteria as FDR < 0.05 & |log2FC| ≥ 1. Differential genes were analyzed by means of the Gene ontology (GO) (http://geneontology.org/ (accessed on 1 July 2023) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/ (accessed on 1 July 2023) enrichment.

2.9. Data Analysis

Graphs were created with Origin 2021 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). The analysis of significant differences among samples was carried out using SPSS Statistics 26 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Antioxidant Activity In Vitro of Lpb. plantarum A72

Lpb. plantarum SC3 was screened from naturally fermented Suancai with in vitro antioxidant capacity equivalent to 270.58 μmol/L L-cysteine [10]. To further enhance the microbiota antioxidant capacity, ARTP mutagenesis was used. ARTP mutagenesis breeding technology is characterized by its simple operation, safety, environmental friendliness, high mutation rate and large mutation reservoir. Therefore, it has been widely used in the field of food and microbiology [19]. A total of 149 mutants were isolated after ARTP treatment (Figure S1A) and cultured in MRS broth containing 1.5 mM H2O2 (Figure S1B). The study’s findings led to the identification of Lpb. plantarum A72 as the best mutagenized strain. In vitro antioxidant activity was then compared to that of Lpb. plantarum SC3, the original strain. The growth curve of Lpb. plantarum A72 was examined, along with its tolerance to acid, bile salt, and gastric and intestinal fluids. The findings demonstrated that Lpb. plantarum A72 exhibited survival rates of 75.58%, 69.12%, 71.93% and 83.63%, respectively, in MRS broth at pH 3.0, MRS broth with bile salt content of 0.3% (w/v), artificial gastric fluid and artificial intestinal fluid (Figure S2A). 0–9 mM H2O2 was shown to be conducive to the growth of Lpb. plantarum A72 (Figure S2B). These findings suggest that Lpb. plantarum A72 is a strain that can grow in H2O2 and is tolerant to acid, bile salts, intestinal fluid and gastric fluid.
To study the antioxidant activity of A72, the original strain SC3 and different parts of the strain, we prepared cell-free supernatant (CFS), intact cells (IC) and cell-free extract (CFE), respectively. The IC and CFS of both strains showed greater DPPH radical scavenging ability than CFE (p < 0.05) (Figure 1A), with inhibition rates of 60.14% and 59.65%, respectively. The IC and CFS of Lpb. plantarum A72 also had strong scavenging activity of superoxide anion radicals (Figure 1B). The superoxide anion scavenging rate of the IC was 41.93%, similar to that of VC. Furthermore, the IC of both strains was significantly greater than that of CFS (p < 0.05). Luan et al., 2021 also found that the IC of Lpb. plantarum CD101 had a significantly greater scavenging capacity of superoxide anion than CFS (p < 0.05), which may be related to intracellular antioxidant substances (antioxidant enzymes, VC, etc.) [20]. The IC or CFS of both strains had higher hydroxyl radical scavenging activity than VC (Figure 1C). CFS had higher hydroxyl radical scavenging activity compared to IC and CFE, and the CFS of Lpb. plantarum A72 had the highest hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of 87.01%, which was 1.10 times higher than that of Lpb. plantarum SC3. Noureen et al., 2018 also found the highest scavenging capacity of 62.75% for hydroxyl radicals by the CFS of Levilactobacillus brevis MG882399 in their study [21]. Studies have shown that Lactobacillus sp. can produce a variety of extracellular compounds such as organic acids, alcohols, phenols, extracellular polysaccharides, bacteriocins and bioactive peptides through fermentation. These compounds may have antioxidant properties [22]. Similarly, in terms of PTIO radical scavenging activity (Figure 1D), both strains showed weaker viability of CFE and IC than CFS. The PTIO radical scavenging activity of IC or CFS of A72 was higher than that of SC3, and comparable to or even higher than that of VC. All fractions of Lpb. plantarum A72 showed greater scavenging capacity for all free radicals than Lpb. plantarum SC3. A study of antioxidant Lpb. plantarum ZJ316 by Wu et al., 2023 also revealed that the antioxidant may be strain-specific [23]. The high antioxidant property of Lactobacillus may be related to the antioxidant function-related genes it possesses, such as the NADH oxidase gene (nox), NADH peroxidase gene (npx) and GSH reductase gene (gshR). In conclusion, the Lpb. plantarum A72 strain obtained from the screening had strong antioxidant properties, and its IC and CFS components were significantly stronger than VC, and also stronger than its initial strain SC3, which was strain-specific.

3.2. Effects of Lpb. plantarum A72 Intact Cells Supplementation on C. elegans Physiological Conditions

As shown in Figure 2A and Table 1, the average lifespan of C. elegans in the control group was 25.33 ± 0.47 days. After intervention with VC or Lpb. plantarum A72, the average lifespan and maximum lifespan of C. elegans were dose-dependently increased (p < 0.05). The highest-dose (109 CFU/mL) Lpb. plantarum A72 was the most effective in prolonging the lifespan of C. elegans, with a 25.13% an increase compared to the control. Li et al., 2022 similarly found that in a C. elegans ageing model, the application of Lpb. plantarum As21 increased the C. elegans lifespan [24]. In another study by Sharma et al. (2018), they intervened with 15 probiotics on C. elegans [25]. The results showed that Lcb. paracasei CD4, Lim. gastricus BTM7 and Lpb. plantarum K90 enhanced the lifespan by 5 days. They believed that the probiotics and postbiotics increased the lifespan of C. elegans via adherence and further colonization of C. elegans in the gut.
Some studies have shown that a longer lifespan was accompanied by a decline in fertility [26]; therefore, we explored the egg production of C. elegans. The results, as shown in Figure 2B, showed no significant effect on the total number of offspring in each group compared with the control group, indicating that the addition of Lpb. plantarum A72 did not affect the fecundity of C. elegans and did not induce the extension of its lifespan by sacrificing their reproduction. A study by Cai et al., 2022 also showed that there was no absolute relationship between the extension of C. elegans lifespan and the decrease in fecundity [27]. In their study, it was found that at a concentration of rice bran peptide KF-8 of 0.1 mM, C. elegans lifespan was extended by 17%, but C. elegans fecundity was not affected. During the ageing process, C. elegans loses muscle cell activity, leading to a reduction in its motility [28]; therefore, head swing was used as an evaluation index of C. elegans. As shown in Figure 2C, all the supplemented groups increased the head swing compared with the control group. C. elegans’ head swing was even significantly stronger (p < 0.05) in the groups supplemented with 107 CFU/mL and 109 CFU/mL Lpb. plantarum A72 than in the VC group. In previous studies, it was also found that the head swing of C. elegans was about 1.18 times higher than that of the control group, in which C. elegans were fed with 1.25 mg/mL of shiitake mushroom polysaccharides [29]. In addition, the head swing of C. elegans was also about 1.22 times higher than the control when fed with 0.1 mM ice bran peptide KF-8.26. This suggests that the addition of Lpb. plantarum (especially A72) helps to resist senescence and maintain head swing in C. elegans.

3.3. Effect of Lpb. plantarum A72 Intact Cells on C. elegans Resistance to Environmentally Induced Oxidative Damage

Environmental factors can induce oxidative damage in the organism [30].
The high temperature induction and hydrogen peroxide induction were used to test C. elegans resistance. The survival rate of C. elegans in the control group was 45.56% in a high-temperature heat stress test (Figure 3A), while the survival rate increased by 29.26% and 46.33% in Lpb. plantarum A72 addition groups (107 CFU/mL and 109 CFU/mL), respectively, which were 1.10 and 1.25 times higher than in the groups supplemented with VC. Similarly, it was found in a previous study that both 0.8 mg/mL and 1.6 mg/mL ethanol extracts of Panax notoginseng (FPE) significantly increased the longevity of C. elegans, by 25.30% and 40.05%, respectively, at 37 °C [31].
In the hydrogen peroxide oxidative stress environment (Figure 3B), the survival rate of C. elegans in the control group was only 35.56%. A significant increase in C. elegans survival was observed with the addition of VC or Lpb. plantarum A72 (p < 0.05). C. elegans survival increased to 40.00%, 45.56% and 57.78% in the low, medium and high Lpb. plantarum A72 dose groups, respectively. The effect of the low- and medium-dose groups was comparable to that of VC, while the high-dose group (109 CFU/mL) was significantly better than VC. This indicated that there was a significant dose–effect relationship between the addition of Lpb. plantarum A72 and the survival of C. elegans. In Jin’s study, C. elegans was fed with 0.8 and 1.6 mg/mL of ethanol extract (Panax notoginseng FPE), and it was found that the fed C. elegans could survive in a hydrogen peroxide environment and there was a significant dose–effect relationship [31]. Among them, the lifespan of C. elegans was enhanced by 25.77% and 35.88% in the low- and high-concentration groups of FPE compared with the control group, respectively. In contrast, our Lpb. plantarum A72 was more resistant to oxidative stress in C. elegans at each concentration than the high-concentration FPE.
Overall, our study found that the Lpb. plantarum A72 strain exhibited similar properties to the FPE in C. elegans, especially in terms of heat tolerance and resistance to oxidative stress. Therefore, the tolerance of C. elegans to high temperatures and oxidative stress could be improved by supplying feeds enriched with an antioxidant strain (Lpb. plantarum A72).

3.4. Determination of the ROS Accumulation, Antioxidant Enzyme Activities and MDA Levels in C. elegans

As one of the most important oxidants, the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) can indirectly reflect the degree of oxidation of the body’s cells, and its accumulation can cause oxidative damage to the body [32]. As shown in Figure 4A, low, medium and high concentrations of Lpb. plantarum A72 were able to reduce the ROS levels and thus protect C. elegans from oxidative stress compared to the control group (p < 0.05). In addition, the ability of Lpb. plantarum A72 to inhibit ROS was related to its concentration. The addition of the 105 CFU/mL A72 group only reduced ROS by 13.03%, while the addition of 107 CFU/mL and 109 CFU/mL A72 groups had a comparable ability to reduce ROS as VC, and in particular, the effect of the 109 CFU/mL A72 group was even better than that of VC (p < 0.05). The results indicated that Lpb. plantarum A72 had good antioxidant properties and could replace VC at a concentration of 109 CFU/mL. Lu et al., 2023 indicated that Latilactobacillus curvatus FFZZH5L might have achieved its antioxidant effect by reducing ROS in C. elegans, for example, by regulating the genes (gst-4) related to ROS in its body [33]. Differences in the antioxidant properties of the two strains of Lpb. plantarum were also found in our study, namely that the ROS content of C. elegans treated with 109 CFU/mL Lpb. plantarum As21 and As39 were reduced by 45.78% and 29.95%, respectively. In an investigation by Jin et al., 2020 variations in the antioxidant resistance of several strains were also discovered [34]. When they fed C. elegans with 10 Lactobacillus, they observed that the most degrading strain, Limosilactobacillus reuteri 9-5, broke down 30% of the reactive oxygen species (ROS).
SOD scavenges superoxide anion radicals produced by the body [35]. CAT could degrade or reduce hydrogen peroxide to water and molecular oxygen [35]. The activities of SOD and CAT can reflect the antioxidant capacity of C. elegans. In Figure 4B,C, the activities of SOD and CAT were increased by the addition of Lpb. plantarum A72, and were found to be positively related with the concentration of Lpb. plantarum A72. Among them, the 109 CFU/mL A72 group had the best effect in increasing the activities of SOD and CAT, which were 1.49 and 1.59 times higher than those of the control group and 1.36 and 1.10 times higher than those of the VC group, respectively. These results are consistent with the above results that ROS accumulation in C. elegans (Figure 4A) thus induced higher expression of SOD and CAT enzymes resulting from the stress oxidative responses. Rhodiola rosea extract is a substance with high oxidizing activity. In a previous study, Jiang et al., 2023 fed 480 μg/mL of Rhodiola rosea extract to C. elegans, which resulted in a 1.78-fold and 1.51-fold increase in SOD and CAT activities, respectively [36]. In addition, Li et al., 2022 found that the SOD and CAT activities in C. elegans increased 1.31-fold and 1.74-fold, respectively, after 109 CFU/mL Lpb. plantarum As21 was fed to C. elegans [24]. In our result, SOD activity in C. elegans was higher after ingestion of the same concentration of Lpb. plantarum A72 than after ingestion of Lpb. plantarum As21. These results suggest that the antioxidant capacity of Lpb. plantarum A72 obtained from the screening is comparable to that of Rhodiola rosea extracts and even superior to other strains reported in the current literature.
Tissue damage by oxygen radicals leads to the production of MDA, and the level of MDA in the body can indirectly reflect the degree of oxidative damage in the body [36]. After the treatment of Lpb. plantarum A72 (Figure 4D), the MDA content in C. elegans was significantly lower than that in the control group and also lower than that in the VC group, which indicated that Lpb. plantarum A72 had a significant effect on the reduction of MDA content, even more so than that of VC. The reduction of MDA by Lpb. plantarum A72 was enhanced with the increase of the concentration. When 109 CFU/mL of Lpb. plantarum A72 was added, the reduction of MDA level in C. elegans could reach 69.52% (p < 0.05). In previous research, Li et al., 2022 reduced the MDA content of C. elegans by 61.14% with 109 CFU/mL Lpb. plantarum As39 [24], and Jiang et al., 2021 reduced the MDA content of C. elegans by 63.4% after feeding with 480 μg/mL Rhodiola rosea extract [28]. The results of A72 in our study were better than those previous reports, indicating that the strain was effective in reducing lipid peroxidation damage in C. elegans.
In summary, the Lpb. plantarum A72 strain can realize its antioxidant function by reducing ROS and MDA levels in C. elegans and enhancing SOD as well as CAT activity in C. elegans. In order to investigate the specific mechanism, we conducted transcriptomic studies on C. elegans that ingested A72.

3.5. Differential Gene Expression of C. elegans Induced by Lpb. plantarum A72 Addition

Compared with the control group, the number of upregulated genes in the A72 group was 58, and the number of downregulated genes was 72, which showed obvious differences in transcript levels (Figure 5A). The differential genes were annotated and analyzed by means of the GO database (Figure 5B), and the differential genes were enriched in terms of cellular components (red), molecular functions (blue), and biological processes (green) in the control and A72 groups. KEGG annotation analysis showed that the differentially expressed genes between the two groups were annotated to the following six branches of the KEGG metabolic pathway: metabolism, genetic information processing, environmental information processing, cellular processes, organismal systems and others. Notably, more differentially expressed genes were annotated to the organismal systems branch between the two groups (Figure 5C). This suggests that the uptake of the Lpb. plantarum A72 strain may delay aging by affecting the expression of aging-related genes in C. elegans.

3.6. Mechanistic Investigation of C. elegans Lifespan Extension by Lpb. plantarum A72 Supplement

KEGG pathway analysis found that sod-5 was significantly upregulated after the consumption of Lpb. plantarum A72 compared to the control C. elegans without the Lpb. plantarum A72 supplement (Figure 6A). The upregulation of the sod-5 gene promoted the synthesis of superoxide dismutase (SOD). A similar phenomenon was observed in a study by Lin et al., 2019, who found that consumption of the antioxidant Rosmarinic acid (RA) significantly extended the lifespan of C. elegans, while significant upregulation of the sod-5 gene was also observed in C. elegans [37]. This is due to the fact that SOD is an enzyme that counteracts the biological oxidant cluster enzyme system and plays an important role in cellular oxidative stress, lipid metabolism, inflammation and oxidation. Expression of the SOD enzyme contributed to the scavenging of bio-oxidants in the body, thereby counteracting the harmful effects of free radicals and slowing down the aging of organisms [38]. In addition, we also observed a significant upregulation of the hsp-16.1 gene, responsible for encoding the small heat shock proteins (sHSPs), in C. elegans after consumption of Lpb. plantarum A72 (Figure 6B). Qin fed C. elegans with Ligusticum chuanxiong rhizome extracts (CXR) and observed that the C. elegans lifespan was prolonged and that hsp-16.1 genes were also significantly upregulated in nematodes. Organismal aging and aging-related degenerative diseases are associated with the misfolding and aggregation of many proteins in various tissues [39]. sHSPs was reported to slow down the aging of organisms and ultimately prolonged lifespan by binding to misfolded proteins and preventing their uncontrolled aggregation [40]. The anti-aging effects of both CXR and the consumption of Lpb. plantarum A72 may be related to the overexpression of sHSPs [41]. Interestingly, earlier research found a positive association between the heat shock transcription factor HSF-1 and the expression of the hsp-16.1 gene [42], as well as a positive correlation between the transcription factor DAF-16 and the expression of the sod-5 gene [43]. However, the gene of transcription factors (daf-16 and hsf-1) did not show significant differential expression in our transcriptome data (Figure 6C,D). It suggests that the upregulation of two genes, sod-5 and hsp-16.1, might not depend on the traditional DAF-16 and HSF-1-controlled pathways to realize the role of delaying senescence in C. elegans, and the specific mechanism remains to be further explored.
Following the administration of Lpb. plantarum A72, a notable observation surfaced: the significant downregulation of the fat-6 gene (Figure 6E) within C. elegans. This gene serves as an inhibitor of fatty acid synthesis, a pivotal factor in cellular oxidative stress. The surplus accumulation of fatty acids precipitates oxidative stress, thereby impairing cellular functionality and expediting the biological aging process. Mitigating the buildup of fatty acids stands as a potential avenue for extending organismal lifespan, similar to the idea that reducing obesity will improve the general health of the organism. The parallel effects of downregulation were discerned in a previous study involving astaxanthin-fed C. elegans, where the intake of astaxanthin concomitantly reduced body fat content and prolonged the organism’s lifespan [44]. In light of this, our current investigation posits that the intake of Lpb. plantarum A72 might effectively extend the lifespan of C. elegans by orchestrating the downregulation of the fat-6 gene, thereby impeding fatty acid synthesis.
Furthermore, our analysis showed that the lips-17 gene, which is closely linked to the synthesis of fatty acids [45], was downregulated (Figure 6F). Our hypothesis suggests a possible connection, like to that of fat-6, between the downregulation of the lips-17 gene and the elongation of the lifespan of C. elegans. Remarkably, this observed relationship between lips-17 downregulation and lifespan extension represents a novel revelation from our investigation.
In summary (Figure 6G), transcriptome research revealed that Lpb. plantarum A72 upregulates the genes responsible for sod-5 and hsp-16.1. This activation stimulates the production of small heat shock proteins and superoxide dismutase, curbing the generation of reactive oxygen species and facilitating the degradation of misfolded proteins. Moreover, our study elucidates for the first time how the ingestion of this strain enables C. elegans to suppress the synthesis of fatty acids by downregulating the fat-6 and lips-17 genes. This process reduces senescence and extends the lifespan of C. elegans.

4. Conclusions

The present study demonstrated that Lpb. plantarum A72 possesses significant antioxidant, anti-aging and longevity extension effects. These effects are due to the probiotic (including the antioxidant action) of the strain. This was demonstrated by the fact that the IC and CFS of this strain scavenged 60.14% and 87.01% of DPPH and hydroxyl radicals, respectively, while showing good growth capacity in 0–9 mM H2O2. By feeding C. elegans with Lpb. plantarum A72, we observed that C. elegans lifespan was extended by 25.13%, motility was enhanced 2.52-fold, and its reproductive ability was not impaired. Lpb. plantarum A72 reduced 34.86% of ROS and 69.52% of MDA in C. elegans and significantly increased the activities of related antioxidant enzymes. The strain enhanced C. elegans survival by 46.33% and 57.78% in high temperature and H2O2, respectively. Through transcriptomics, it was found that the strain could achieve the effect of anti-aging and prolonging lifespan of C. elegans by upregulating the sod-5 and hsp-16.1 genes and downregulating the fat-6 and lips-17 genes. Therefore, Lpb. plantarum A72 is an effective antioxidant and anti-aging strain. In the future, Lpb. plantarum A72 may be expected to be used in the fermentation of food and other fields. The strain provides for the development of antioxidant functional foods.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods13060924/s1, Figure S1: Results of ARTP mutagenesis selection of Lpb. plantarum SC3 as the parent strain. (A) ARTP mutagenesis lethality curve. (B) The growth results of 149 mutant strains and Lpb. plantarum SC3 in MRS broth with 1.5 mM H2O2. The color of the heatmap indicates the OD600 value of the strains after 20 h in MRS broth with 1.5 mM H2O2, and the redder the color, the better the growth. Figure S2: Beneficence and growth curve of Lpb. plantarum A72. (A) Survival of Lpb. plantarum A72 cultured for 4 h in MRS broth at pH = 3.0, MRS broth with a bile salt concentration of 0.3% (w/v), artificial gastric fluid and artificial intestinal fluid. (B) Growth curves of Lpb. plantarum A72 in different concentrations of H2O2 MRS broth. a Lpb. plantarum A72 was tolerant to acid, bile salts, artificial intestinal fluid and gastric fluid environments and the four tolerances were not significant.

Author Contributions

S.Z. (Sibo Zou): Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Reviewing and Editing. Q.W.: Methodology, Investigation. Z.L.: Validation, Data Curation. S.Z. (Sufang Zhang): Writing—Reviewing and Editing. L.D.: Resources. Y.C.: Resources. Y.D.: Resources. C.J.: Resources. H.L.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Project Administration. X.L.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Project Administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Project (2023YFD2100304), the High-Level Talents Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project of Dalian (2021RQ093) and the Basic Research Project of the Education Department of Liaoning Province (LJKZ0544).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guedj, A.; Volman, Y.; Geiger-Maor, A.; Bolik, J.; Schumacher, N.; Künzel, S.; Baines, J.F.; Nevo, Y.; Elgavish, S.; Galun, E.; et al. Gut microbiota shape ‘inflamm-ageing’ cytokines and account for age-dependent decline in DNA damage repair. Gut 2020, 69, 1064–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. He, M.; Chiang, H.H.; Luo, H.; Zheng, Z.; Qiao, Q.; Wang, L.; Tan, M.; Ohkubo, R.; Mu, W.C.; Zhao, S. An acetylation switch of the NLRP3 inflammasome regulates aging-associated chronic inflammation and insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2020, 31, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ge, Q.; Yang, B.; Liu, R.; Jiang, D.; Yu, H.; Wu, M.; Zhang, W. Antioxidant activity of Lactobacillus plantarum NJAU-01 in an animal model of aging. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Feng, T.; Wang, J. Oxidative stress tolerance and antioxidant capacity of lactic acid bacteria as probiotic: A systematic review. Gut Microbes 2020, 12, 1801944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Liu, W.; Wei, Z.; Yin, B.; Man, C.; Jiang, Y. Enhancement of functional characteristics of blueberry juice fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 139, 110590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pan, Y.; Wang, H.; Tan, F.; Yi, R.; Li, W.; Long, X.; Mu, J.; Zhao, X. Lactobacillus plantarum KFY02 enhances the prevention of CCl4-induced liver injury by transforming geniposide into genipin to increase the antioxidant capacity of mice. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 73, 104128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Evans, K.S.; van Wijk, M.H.; McGrath, P.T.; Andersen, E.C.; Sterken, M.G. From QTL to gene: C. elegans facilitates discoveries of the genetic mechanisms underlying natural variation. Trends Genet. 2021, 37, 933–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, N.; Li, Q.; He, X.; Gao, X.; Wu, L.; Xiao, M.; Cai, W.; Liu, B.; Zeng, F. Antioxidant and anti-aging activities of Laminaria japonica polysaccharide in Caenorhabditis elegans based on metabonomic analysis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 221, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, J.; Zhong, X.; Sun, D.; Xu, L.; Shi, L.; Sui, J.; Liu, Y. Anti-aging effects of polysaccharides from ginseng extract residues in Caenorhabditis elegans. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 225, 1072–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zou, S.B.; Zhao, M.W.; Ji, C.F.; Lin, S.F.; Sufang, Z.; Liang, H. Screening of high antioxidant activity lactic acid bacteria in traditional fermented Suancai of northeast China and its prebiotic studies. J. Food Saf. Qual. 2023, 14, 42–50. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, H.; Li, L. Comprehensive evaluation of probiotic property, hypoglycemic ability and antioxidant activity of lactic acid bacteria. Foods 2022, 11, 1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, H.; Huang, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Ren, Y.; Yue, T.; Wang, Z.; Gao, Z. Study on the nutritional characteristics and antioxidant activity of dealcoholized sequentially fermented apple juice with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus plantarum fermentation. Food Chem. 2021, 363, 130351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, W.; Wang, T. Effect of solid-state fermentation with Bacillus subtilis lwo on the proteolysis and the antioxidative properties of chickpeas. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 338, 108988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, X. 2-Phenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl 3-oxide (PTIO•) radical scavenging: A new and simple antioxidant assay in vitro. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 6288–6297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhao, X.; Fu, K.; Xiang, K.P.; Wang, L.Y.; Zhang, Y.F.; Luo, Y.P. Comparison of the chronic and multigenerational toxicity of racemic glufosinate and L-glufosinate to Caenorhabditis elegans at environmental concentrations. Chemosphere 2023, 316, 137863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, Z.; Sun, T. Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus Probio-M9 extends the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, Y.; Shi, J.; Liu, K.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Liu, Y. Metabolomics and gene expression levels reveal the positive effects of teaseed oil on lifespan and aging process in Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2023, 12, 1391–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, L.; Xiao, M.F.; Chen, H.P.; Liu, B.; Zeng, F. Antioxidant activity of oyster peptide fraction OE-I and its anti-aging effect on Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Sci. 2022, 43, 152–160. [Google Scholar]
  19. Xue, Z.; Yinan, W.; Fei, M. Advances in the application of ARTP mutagenesis for biocatalyst modification in food and feed processing. Biotechnol. Bus. 2019, 3, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  20. Luan, X.; Feng, M.; Sun, J. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum on antioxidant activity in fermented sausage. Food Res. Int. 2021, 144, 110351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Noureen, S.; Riaz, A.; Saif, A.; Arshad, M.; Qamar, M.; Arshad, N. Antioxidant properties of Lactobacillus brevis of Horse Origin and Commercial Lactic Acid Bacterial Strains: A Comparison. Pak. Vet. J. 2018, 38, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khubber, S.; Marti-Quijal, F.J.; Tomasevic, I.; Remize, F.; Barba, F.J. Lactic acid fermentation as a useful strategy to recover antimicrobial and antioxidant compounds from food and by-products. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2022, 43, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, S.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Wei, F.; Li, P.; Gu, Q. Antioxidant properties and molecular mechanisms of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ZJ316: A potential probiotic resource. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 187, 115269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, W.; Huang, W.; Ma, Y.; Muhammad, I.; Hanif, A.; Ding, Z.; Guo, X. Antioxidant properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional fermented yak milk and their probiotic effects on the oxidative senescence of Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 3690–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sharma, K.; Pooranachithra, M.; Balamurugan, K.; Goel, G. Multivariate Analysis of Increase in Life Span of Caenorhabditis elegans Through Intestinal Colonization by Indigenous Probiotic Strains. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2018, 11, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gazzola, S.; Fontana, C.; Bassi, D.; Cocconcelli, P. Assessment of tetracycline and erythromycin resistance transfer during sausage fermentation by culture-dependent and-independent methods. Food Microbiol. 2012, 30, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cai, J.; Chen, Z.; Wu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J.; Lin, Q.; Liang, Y. The rice bran peptide KF-8 extends the lifespan and improves the healthspan of Caenorhabditis elegans via skn-1 and daf-16. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 2427–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jiang, S.; Deng, N.; Zheng, B.; Li, T.; Liu, R.H. Rhodiola extract promotes longevity and stress resistance of Caenorhabditis elegans via DAF-16 and SKN-1. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 4471–4483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Sun, W.; Ji, X.; Zhang, S.; Qiao, K. Lentinan extends lifespan and increases oxidative stress resistance through DAF-16 and SKN-1 pathways in Caenorhabditis elegans. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 202, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ritchie, D.J.; Friesen, C.R. Invited review: Thermal effects on oxidative stress in vertebrate ectotherms. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2022, 263, 111082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jin, S.Y.; Li, D.Q.; Lu, S.; Han, L.T.; Liu, D.H.; Huang, Z.; Huang, B.S.; Cao, Y. Ethanol extracts of Panax notoginseng increase lifespan and protect against oxidative stress in Caenorhabditis elegans via the insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 58, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumar, H.; Dhalaria, R.; Guleria, S.; Cimler, R.; Sharma, R.; Siddiqui, S.A.; Valko, M.; Nepovimova, E.; Dhanjal, D.S.; Singh, R. Anti-oxidant potential of plants and probiotic spp. in alleviating oxidative stress induced by H2O2. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 165, 115022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lu, H.; Sun, L.; Tong, S.; Jiang, F.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y. Latilactobacillus curvatus FFZZH5L isolated from pickled cowpea enhanced antioxidant activity in Caenorhabditis elegans by upregulating the level of glutathione S-transferase. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 8646–8660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jin, X.; He, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, G.; Sun, Z.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. Lactic acid bacteria exhibit similar antioxidant capacities in Caenorhabditis elegans and Campylobacter jejuni-infected mice. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 3329–3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hu, T.; Chen, R.; Qian, Y.; Ye, K.; Long, X.; Park, K.-Y.; Zhao, X. Antioxidant effect of Lactobacillus fermentum HFY02-fermented soy milk on D-galactose-induced aging mouse model. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2022, 11, 1362–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jiang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, J.; Yao, J.; Lu, A.; Fang, Z.; Wang, G.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Y. Composition analysis of acid hydrolysates from Cucurbita moschata Duch. polysaccharides and their effect on oxidative stress resistance of Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2023, 12, 795–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lin, C.; Xiao, J.; Xi, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhong, Q.; Zheng, H.; Cao, Y.; Chen, Y. Rosmarinic acid improved antioxidant properties and healthspan via the IIS and MAPK pathways in Caenorhabditis elegans. BioFactors 2019, 45, 774–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zheng, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Yang, Z.; Xu, W.; Chen, Q. The applications and mechanisms of superoxide dismutase in medicine, food, and cosmetics. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Cuanalo-Contreras, K.; Schulz, J.; Mukherjee, A.; Park, K.-W.; Armijo, E.; Soto, C. Extensive accumulation of misfolded protein aggregates during natural aging and senescence. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2023, 14, 1090109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Reinle, K.; Mogk, A.; Bukau, B. The diverse functions of small heat shock proteins in the proteostasis network. J. Mol. Biol. 2022, 434, 167157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qin, Y.; Chen, F.; Tang, Z.; Ren, H.; Wang, Q.; Shen, N.; Lin, W.; Xiao, Y.; Yuan, M.; Chen, H. Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort as a medicinal and edible plant foods: Antioxidant, anti-aging and neuroprotective properties in Caenorhabditis elegans. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 1049890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kumsta, C.; Chang, J.T.; Schmalz, J.; Hansen, M. Hormetic heat stress and HSF-1 induce autophagy to improve survival and proteostasis in C. elegans. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zečić, A.; Braeckman, B.P. DAF-16/FoxO in Caenorhabditis elegans and its role in metabolic remodeling. Cells 2020, 9, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xie, J.; Hou, X.; He, W.; Xiao, J.; Cao, Y.; Liu, X. Astaxanthin reduces fat storage in a fat-6/fat-7 dependent manner determined using high fat Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 7347–7360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ackerman, D.; Gems, D. The mystery of C. elegans aging: An emerging role for fat: Distant parallels between C. elegans aging and metabolic syndrome? BioEssays 2012, 34, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. In vitro antioxidant properties of Lpb. plantarum SC3 and A72. (A) DPPH radical scavenging; (B) superoxide anion radical scavenging; (C) hydroxyl radical scavenging; (D) PTIO radical scavenging. (IC: intact cells; CFE: cell-free extracts; CFS: cell-free supernatant; VC: 0.1 mg/mL Vitamin C. a–g Mean values with different letters in the bar are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. In vitro antioxidant properties of Lpb. plantarum SC3 and A72. (A) DPPH radical scavenging; (B) superoxide anion radical scavenging; (C) hydroxyl radical scavenging; (D) PTIO radical scavenging. (IC: intact cells; CFE: cell-free extracts; CFS: cell-free supernatant; VC: 0.1 mg/mL Vitamin C. a–g Mean values with different letters in the bar are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Foods 13 00924 g001
Figure 2. Effects of Lpb. plantarum A72 intact cells on the physiological conditions of C. elegans. (A) Survival curves; (B) total number of progeny; (C) head swing. (a–d Mean values with different letters in the bar are significantly different (p < 0.05). ns no significant difference compared to the control group).
Figure 2. Effects of Lpb. plantarum A72 intact cells on the physiological conditions of C. elegans. (A) Survival curves; (B) total number of progeny; (C) head swing. (a–d Mean values with different letters in the bar are significantly different (p < 0.05). ns no significant difference compared to the control group).
Foods 13 00924 g002
Figure 3. Effect of Lpb. plantarum A72 intact cells on C. elegans resistance to environmental factors. (A) High-temperature heat stress test; (B) hydrogen peroxide oxidative stress test. (a–b Mean values with different letters in the bar are significantly different (p < 0.05)).
Figure 3. Effect of Lpb. plantarum A72 intact cells on C. elegans resistance to environmental factors. (A) High-temperature heat stress test; (B) hydrogen peroxide oxidative stress test. (a–b Mean values with different letters in the bar are significantly different (p < 0.05)).
Foods 13 00924 g003
Figure 4. Effect of Lpb. plantarum A72 intact cells on the antioxidant defense system in C. elegans. (A) ROS accumulation; (B) SOD activity; (C) CAT activity; (D) MDA level. (a–d Mean values with different letters in the bar are significantly different (p < 0.05)).
Figure 4. Effect of Lpb. plantarum A72 intact cells on the antioxidant defense system in C. elegans. (A) ROS accumulation; (B) SOD activity; (C) CAT activity; (D) MDA level. (a–d Mean values with different letters in the bar are significantly different (p < 0.05)).
Foods 13 00924 g004
Figure 5. Differential gene expression of C. elegans induced by 109 CFU/mL Lpb. plantarum A72. (A) Number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were upregulated (red) and downregulated (blue) in the Lpb. plantarum A72-treated or control groups. Experiments were performed using three replicates per group (n = 3); (B) Gene ontology (GO) annotation of DEGs. The horizontal coordinates indicate the total number of differentially expressed genes annotated to GO secondary taxonomic function. The vertical coordinates indicate GO secondary taxonomic names. The same column color represents the same GO primary taxonomic classification; (C) Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) annotation of DEGs. The horizontal coordinates indicate the names of KEGG metabolic pathways. The vertical coordinates indicate the total number of differentially expressed genes annotated to the pathway. The same column color represents the same KEGG metabolic pathway classification.
Figure 5. Differential gene expression of C. elegans induced by 109 CFU/mL Lpb. plantarum A72. (A) Number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were upregulated (red) and downregulated (blue) in the Lpb. plantarum A72-treated or control groups. Experiments were performed using three replicates per group (n = 3); (B) Gene ontology (GO) annotation of DEGs. The horizontal coordinates indicate the total number of differentially expressed genes annotated to GO secondary taxonomic function. The vertical coordinates indicate GO secondary taxonomic names. The same column color represents the same GO primary taxonomic classification; (C) Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) annotation of DEGs. The horizontal coordinates indicate the names of KEGG metabolic pathways. The vertical coordinates indicate the total number of differentially expressed genes annotated to the pathway. The same column color represents the same KEGG metabolic pathway classification.
Foods 13 00924 g005
Figure 6. Mechanistic resolution of C. elegans lifespan extension by Lpb. plantarum A72. (A) Differential expression of sod-5 genes; (B) differential expression of hsp-16.1 genes; (C) differential expression of daf-16 genes; (D) differential expression of hsf-1 genes; (E) differential expression of fat-6 genes; (F) differential expression of lips-17 genes; (G) visualization of Lpb. plantarum A72 on C. elegans lifespan extension. Circles represent proteins. Boxes represent genes. Upward and downward arrows indicate up- and downregulation of genes, respectively. Solid lines with arrows indicate facilitation. Truncated solid lines indicate inhibition. Truncated dashed lines indicate possible inhibition. (**, *** significance of differential expression of this gene in the A72 group versus control, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively; ns differential expression of this gene in the A72 group was not significant with control).
Figure 6. Mechanistic resolution of C. elegans lifespan extension by Lpb. plantarum A72. (A) Differential expression of sod-5 genes; (B) differential expression of hsp-16.1 genes; (C) differential expression of daf-16 genes; (D) differential expression of hsf-1 genes; (E) differential expression of fat-6 genes; (F) differential expression of lips-17 genes; (G) visualization of Lpb. plantarum A72 on C. elegans lifespan extension. Circles represent proteins. Boxes represent genes. Upward and downward arrows indicate up- and downregulation of genes, respectively. Solid lines with arrows indicate facilitation. Truncated solid lines indicate inhibition. Truncated dashed lines indicate possible inhibition. (**, *** significance of differential expression of this gene in the A72 group versus control, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively; ns differential expression of this gene in the A72 group was not significant with control).
Foods 13 00924 g006
Table 1. Effect of Lpb. plantarum A72 intact cells on the lifespan of C. elegans.
Table 1. Effect of Lpb. plantarum A72 intact cells on the lifespan of C. elegans.
GroupAverage Lifespan (Days)Percentage Increase (%)Maximum Lifespan (Days)
Control25.33 ± 0.47 d 26
VC27.67 ± 0.47 c9.28 ± 3.84 b28
105 CFU/mL29.00 ± 0.82 bc14.56 ± 5.13 ab30
107 CFU/mL30.33 ± 1.25 ab19.85 ± 6.72 ab32
109 CFU/mL31.67 ± 1.25 a25.13 ± 7.08 a33
Different letters represent significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zou, S.; Wu, Q.; Li, Z.; Zhang, S.; Dong, L.; Chen, Y.; Dai, Y.; Ji, C.; Liang, H.; Lin, X. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum A72, a Strain with Antioxidant Properties, Obtained through ARTP Mutagenesis, Affects Caenorhabditis elegans Anti-Aging. Foods 2024, 13, 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13060924

AMA Style

Zou S, Wu Q, Li Z, Zhang S, Dong L, Chen Y, Dai Y, Ji C, Liang H, Lin X. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum A72, a Strain with Antioxidant Properties, Obtained through ARTP Mutagenesis, Affects Caenorhabditis elegans Anti-Aging. Foods. 2024; 13(6):924. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13060924

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zou, Sibo, Qi Wu, Zhigao Li, Sufang Zhang, Liang Dong, Yingxi Chen, Yiwei Dai, Chaofan Ji, Huipeng Liang, and Xinping Lin. 2024. "Lactiplantibacillus plantarum A72, a Strain with Antioxidant Properties, Obtained through ARTP Mutagenesis, Affects Caenorhabditis elegans Anti-Aging" Foods 13, no. 6: 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13060924

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop