Effect of Shape, Size, and Color of the Food Plate on Consumer Perception of Energy Value, Portion Size, Attractiveness, and Expected Price of Dessert
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- The color, size, and shape of the plate will affect the consumer’s perception of dessert.
- Colorful plates and plates other than round (standard) plates will improve dish liking.
- Food neophobia will have a significant effect on dessert served on different plates.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Study Material
2.3. Data Collection
- Polish-speaking adult subjects, who gave consent to participate in the study.
- Subjects who declared no visual impairments.
2.4. Questionnaire
- appearance (dislike–like very much);
- portion size (100–300 g);
- price (PLN 6–18 = EUR 1.3–4);
- energy value (475–1425 kcal).
2.5. Characteristics of Respondents
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Effect of Plate Size on Dessert Perception
3.2. Effect of Plate Shape on Dessert Perception
3.3. Effect of Plate Color on Dessert Perception
3.4. Effect of the Food Neophobia Level and Other Socio-Demographic Features on Dessert Perception
4. Limitations
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Scaglioni, S.; De Cosmi, V.; Ciappolino, V.; Parazzini, F.; Brambilla, P.; Agostoni, C. Factors Influencing Children’s Eating Behaviours. Nutrients 2018, 10, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giboreau, A.; Dougkas, A. Gastronomy as an Aid to Increasing People’s Food Intake at Healthcare Institutions. In Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 540–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mielby, L.A.; Wang, Q.J.; Jensen, S.; Bertelsen, A.S.; Kidmose, U.; Spence, C.; Byrne, D.V. See, Feel, Taste: The Influence of Receptacle Colour and Weight on the Evaluation of Flavoured Carbonated Beverages. Foods 2018, 7, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spence, C.; Piqueras-Fiszman, B. The Perfect Meal; Wiley: Hoboken, NY, USA, 2014; ISBN 9781118490822. [Google Scholar]
- Seo, H.S. Sensory Nudges: The Influences of Environmental Contexts on Consumers’ Sensory Perception, Emotional Responses, and Behaviors toward Foods and Beverages. Foods 2020, 9, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spence, C.; Motoki, K.; Petit, O. Factors Influencing the Visual Deliciousness/Eye-Appeal of Food. Food Qual. Prefer. 2022, 102, 104672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mengual-Recuerda, A.; Tur-Viñes, V.; Juárez-Varón, D. Neuromarketing in Haute Cuisine Gastronomic Experiences. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Głuchowski, A.; Czarniecka-Skubina, E.; Kostyra, E.; Wasiak-Zys, G.; Bylinka, K. Sensory Features, Liking and Emotions of Consumers towards Classical, Molecular and Note by Note Foods. Foods 2021, 10, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spence, C. On the Manipulation, and Meaning(s), of Color in Food: A Historical Perspective. J. Food Sci. 2022, 88, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blechert, J.; Meule, A.; Busch, N.A.; Ohla, K. Food-Pics: An Image Database for Experimental Research on Eating and Appetite. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5, 91460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spence, C. Background Colour & Its Impact on Food Perception & Behaviour. Food Qual. Prefer. 2018, 68, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spence, C. Explaining Visual Shape–Taste Crossmodal Correspondences. Multisensory Res. 2023, 36, 313–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeesan, S.A.; Seo, H.S. Color-Induced Aroma Illusion: Color Cues Can Modulate Consumer Perception, Acceptance, and Emotional Responses toward Cooked Rice. Foods 2020, 9, 1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; An, J.; Spence, C.; Wan, X. Influence of the Color and Size of the Plate on the Subjective Ratings of, Taste Expectations Concerning, and Willingness-to-Pay for, Asian Noodles. J. Sens. Stud. 2018, 33, e12443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stewart, P.C.; Goss, E. Plate Shape and Colour Interact to Influence Taste and Quality Judgments. Flavour 2013, 2, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piqueras-Fiszman, B.; Giboreau, A.; Spence, C. Assessing the Influence of the Color of the Plate on the Perception of a Complex Food in a Restaurant Setting. Flavour 2013, 2, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piqueras-Fiszman, B.; Alcaide, J.; Roura, E.; Spence, C. Is It the Plate or Is It the Food? Assessing the Influence of the Color (Black or White) and Shape of the Plate on the Perception of the Food Placed on It. Food Qual. Prefer. 2012, 24, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peter Herman, C.; Polivy, J.; Pliner, P.; Vartanian, L.R. Mechanisms Underlying the Portion-Size Effect. Physiol. Behav. 2015, 144, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penaforte, F.R.O.; Japur, C.C.; Diez-Garcia, R.W.; Hernandez, J.C.; Palmma-Linares, I.; Chiarello, P.G. Plate Size Does Not Affect Perception of Food Portion Size. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2014, 27, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McClain, A.D.; Van Den Bos, W.; Matheson, D.; Desai, M.; McClure, S.M.; Robinson, T.N. Visual Illusions and Plate Design: The Effects of Plate Rim Widths and Rim Coloring on Perceived Food Portion Size. Int. J. Obes. 2014, 38, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimpo, M.; Akamatsu, R. The Effects of Bowl Size and Portion Size on Food Intake and Fullness Ratings in a Sample of Japanese Men. Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 3216–3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabiei, S.; Nazari, M. Effects of Food Plate Size and Color on Visual Perception of Satiety in Adolescents; a New Strategy toward Weight Management. Iran. J. Public Health 2023, 52, 1289–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowley, J.; Spence, C. Does the Visual Composition of a Dish Influence the Perception of Portion Size and Hedonic Preference? Appetite 2018, 128, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- English, L.; Lasschuijt, M.; Keller, K.L. Mechanisms of the Portion Size Effect. What Is Known and Where Do We Go from Here? Appetite 2015, 88, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Youssef, J.; Juravle, G.; Youssef, L.; Woods, A.; Spence, C. Aesthetic Plating: A Preference for Oblique Lines Ascending to the Right. Flavour 2015, 4, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velasco, C.; Michel, C.; Woods, A.T.; Spence, C. On the Importance of Balance to Aesthetic Plating. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2016, 5–6, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michel, C.; Woods, A.T.; Neuhäuser, M.; Landgraf, A.; Spence, C. Rotating Plates: Online Study Demonstrates the Importance of Orientation in the Plating of Food. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 44, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, Y.; Narumi, T.; Tanikawa, T.; Hirose, M. Taste in Motion: The Effect of Projection Mapping of a Boiling Effect on Food Expectation, Food Perception, and Purchasing Behavior. Front. Comput. Sci. 2021, 3, 662824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berčík, J.; Paluchová, J.; Neomániová, K. Neurogastronomy as a Tool for Evaluating Emotions and Visual Preferences of Selected Food Served in Different Ways. Foods 2021, 10, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Holden, S.S.; Zlatevska, N.; Dubelaar, C. Whether Smaller Plates Reduce Consumption Depends on Who’s Serving and Who’s Looking: A Meta-Analysis. SSRN Electron. J. 2016, 1, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schacht, A.; Łuczak, A.; Pinkpank, T.; Vilgis, T.; Sommer, W. The Valence of Food in Pictures and on the Plate: Impacts on Brain and Body. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2016, 5–6, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pliner, P.; Hobden, K. Development of a Scale to Measure the Trait of Food Neophobia in Humans. Appetite 1992, 19, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldsmith, R.E.; Hofacker, C.F. Measuring Consumer Innovativeness. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1991, 19, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vidigal, M.C.T.R.; Minim, V.P.R.; Simiqueli, A.A.; Souza, P.H.P.; Balbino, D.F.; Minim, L.A. Food Technology Neophobia and Consumer Attitudes toward Foods Produced by New and Conventional Technologies: A Case Study in Brazil. LWT 2015, 60, 832–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spence, C.; Piqueras-Fiszman, B.; Michel, C.; Deroy, O. Plating Manifesto (II): The Art and Science of Plating. Flavour 2014, 3, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cahayadi, J.; Geng, X.; Mirosa, M.; Peng, M. Expectancy versus Experience—Comparing Portion-Size-Effect during Pre-Meal Planning and Actual Intake. Appetite 2019, 135, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Szocs, C.; Lefebvre, S. Spread or Stacked? Vertical versus Horizontal Food Presentation, Portion Size Perceptions, and Consumption. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 75, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Wang, C.; Wan, X. Self-Construal Priming Modulates the Influence of Receptacles on Food Perception. J. Sens. Stud. 2021, 36, e12642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, M. How Does Plate Size Affect Estimated Satiation and Intake for Individuals in Normal-Weight and Overweight Groups? Obes. Sci. Pract. 2017, 3, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sim, A.Y.; Cheon, B.K. Thinking about the Bigger Picture: Influence of Holistic Processing on the Dishware Size Effect. Food Qual. Prefer. 2022, 102, 104670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharp, D.; Sobal, J.; Wethington, E. Do Adults Draw Differently-Sized Meals on Larger or Smaller Plates? Examining Plate Size in a Community Sample. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 74, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, M.; Adam, S.; Hautus, M.J.; Shin, M.; Duizer, L.M.; Yan, H. See Food Diet? Cultural Differences in Estimating Fullness and Intake as a Function of Plate Size. Appetite 2017, 117, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abeywickrema, S.; Peng, M. The Role of Tableware Size in Healthy Eating—Effects on Downstream Food Intake. Foods 2023, 12, 1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jang, J.K.; Yang, B.; Mattila, A. The Impact of Plate Shape and Organization on Americans’ Perceptions of Korean Restaurants. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2021, 24, 730–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michel, C.; Velasco, C.; Spence, C. Cutlery Matters: Heavy Cutlery Enhances Diners’ Enjoyment of the Food Served in a Realistic Dining Environment. Flavour 2015, 4, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kpossa, M.R.; Lick, E. Visual Merchandising of Pastries in Foodscapes: The Influence of Plate Colours on Consumers’ Flavour Expectations and Perceptions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 52, 101684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, C.H.; Mattila, A.; Bordi, P.; Kwon, E. It Tastes Better When Bach Meets Red: The Role of Music and Plate Color on Food Evaluation. Br. Food J. 2020, 122, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vermeir, I.; Roose, G. Visual Design Cues Impacting Food Choice: A Review and Future Research Agenda. Foods 2020, 9, 1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Campo, R.; Loporcaro, G.; Baldassarre, F. The Effects of Food Aesthetics on Consumers. Visual Stimuli and Food Marketing. Dubrov. Int. Econ. Meet. Sveučilište Dubrovniku 2017, 3, 553–565. [Google Scholar]
- Michel, C.; Velasco, C.; Fraemohs, P.; Spence, C. Studying the Impact of Plating on Ratings of the Food Served in a Naturalistic Dining Context. Appetite 2015, 90, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, S.; Qian, J.; Wu, C.; He, D.; Zhang, W.; Yan, J.; He, X. Tasting More Than Just Food: Effect of Aesthetic Appeal of Plate Patterns on Food Perception. Foods 2022, 11, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akyol, A.; Ayaz, A.; Inan-Eroglu, E.; Cetin, C.; Samur, G. Impact of Three Different Plate Colours on Short-Term Satiety and Energy Intake: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutr. J. 2018, 17, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reutner, L.; Genschow, O.; Wänke, M. The Adaptive Eater: Perceived Healthiness Moderates the Effect of the Color Red on Consumption. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 44, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.C.; Tsui, P.L.; Lee, C.S.; Chen, G.L. Can Plate Colour Promote Appetite and Joy While Dining? An Investigative Study in Chinese Fine Dining Restaurants. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2020, 32, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunaratne, N.M.; Fuentes, S.; Gunaratne, T.M.; Torrico, D.D.; Ashman, H.; Francis, C.; Viejo, C.G.; Dunshea, F.R. Consumer Acceptability, Eye Fixation, and Physiological Responses: A Study of Novel and Familiar Chocolate Packaging Designs Using Eye-Tracking Devices. Foods 2019, 8, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quach, S.; Septianto, F.; Thaichon, P. The Divergent Effects of Neat Food Presentation on Purchase Likelihood: The Moderating Role of Time-Related Positioning. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2022, 35, 1425–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaeger, S.R.; Rasmussen, M.A.; Prescott, J. Relationships between Food Neophobia and Food Intake and Preferences: Findings from a Sample of New Zealand Adults. Appetite 2017, 116, 410–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Feature | Group | Respondents | |
---|---|---|---|
Number (n) | Percentage (%) | ||
Total | - | 1005 | 100.0 |
Gender | Women Men | 770 235 | 76.6 23.4 |
Age | 18–25 years old 26–40 years old 41–55 years old >56 years old | 667 135 161 42 | 66.4 13.4 16.0 4.2 |
Education | Vocational or primary school Secondary school Higher education (university) | 152 485 384 | 14.9 47.5 37.6 |
Dwelling Place | City Village | 712 131 | 70.8 29.2 |
Financial Situation in Own Opinion | Very good Good Not good, not bad bad | 151 535 291 28 | 15.0 53.2 29.0 2.8 |
Food Neophobia Level | The most neophiliac (10.0–21.4) The most neutral (21.4–41.8) The most neophobic (41.8–70.0) | 479 482 44 | 47.7 48.0 4.4 |
Domain-Specific Innovativeness Level | Adapters (6–21) Neutrals (22–26) Innovators (27–42) | 448 306 251 | 44.6 30.4 25.0 |
Evaluated Features | Mean Values + SE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
24 cm | 27 cm | 31 cm | p | |
appearance (1–11 c.u.*) | 7.60 c ± 0.06 | 7.20 b ± 0.06 | 6.60 a ± 0.07 | 0.000 |
portion size (g) | 217.07 b ± 1.43 | 213.31 b ± 1.44 | 205.96 a ± 1.52 | 0.000 |
energy value (kcal) | 987.43 b ± 7.12 | 979.43 b ± 7.35 | 958.47 a ± 7.38 | 0.008 |
menu price (PLN) | 14.07 a ± 0.08 | 13.94 a ± 0.08 | 13.96 a ± 0.09 | 0.595 |
Evaluated Features | Mean Values + SE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Round Plate | Square Plate | Rectangular Plate | p | |
appearance (1–11 c.u.*) | 7.80 b ± 0.07 | 7.50 a ± 0.13 | 8.00 b ± 0.15 | 0.049 |
portion size (g) | 210.09 a ± 1.70 | 213.51 a ± 3.24 | 211.57 a ± 4.41 | 0.638 |
energy value (kcal) | 956.98 a ± 8.43 | 978.30 a ± 16.92 | 958.47 a ± 22.29 | 0.528 |
menu price (PLN) | 14.17 a ± 0.10 | 14.18 a ± 0.19 | 14.26 a ± 0.23 | 0.940 |
Evaluated Features | Mean Values + SE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
White Plate | Black Plate | Red Plate | p | |
appearance (1–11 c.u.) | 7.10 a ± 0.07 | 8.00 b ± 0.06 | 6.80 a ± 0.08 | 0.000 |
portion size(g) | 213.74 a ± 1.45 | 217.62 a ± 1.47 | 214.53 a ± 1.43 | 0.117 |
energy value(kcal) | 981.63 a ± 7.32 | 992.88 a ± 7.58 | 988.96 a ± 7.41 | 0.502 |
menu price (PLN) | 13.93 a ± 0.09 | 14.72 c ± 0.09 | 14.22 b ± 0.09 | 0.000 |
Attributes | Frequency of Citations | ||
---|---|---|---|
White Plate | Black Plate | Red Plate | |
surprising | 0.103 a | 0.405 b | 0.399 b |
boring | 0.347 c | 0.053 a | 0.087 b |
traditional | 0.639 c | 0.151 a | 0.198 b |
modern | 0.160 a | 0.648 c | 0.445 b |
appetizing | 0.516 a | 0.647 b | 0.522 a |
unappetizing | 0.060 b | 0.037 a | 0.114 c |
cheap | 0.259 c | 0.062 a | 0.017 b |
expensive | 0.122 a | 0.438 c | 0.234 b |
aesthetic | 0.500 a | 0.696 b | 0.534 a |
unsightly | 0.047 a | 0.032 a | 0.119 b |
natural | 0.420 b | 0.233 a | 0.228 a |
artificial | 0.024 a | 0.074 b | 0.238 c |
Total number of citations | 3213 | 3491 | 3305 |
Feature | Food Neophobia Level | Appearance | Portion Size | Energy Value | Dessert Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
red plate | Neophiliac | 6.8 a ± 0.2 | 211,6 a ± 3.26 | 948.4 a ± 17.0 | 14.6 a ± 0.2 |
Neutral | 6.8 a ± 0.1 | 215.7 a ± 1.72 | 990.4 a,b ± 8.9 | 14.2 a ± 0.1 | |
Neophobic | 6.6 a ± 0.2 | 212.6 a ± 4.11 | 1030.7 b ± 20.5 | 13.9 a ± 0.3 | |
black plate | Neophiliac | 8.3 b ± 0.1 | 213.1 a ± 3.24 | 948.4 a ± 17.5 | 15.1 a ± 0.2 |
Neutral | 8.0 a,b ± 0.1 | 219.2 a ± 1.76 | 997.9 a ± 17.0 | 14.7 a ± 0.1 | |
Neophobic | 7.4 a ± 0.2 | 215.7 a ± 4.37 | 1024.2 b ± 22.2 | 14.3 a ± 0.2 | |
white plate | Neophiliac | 7.3 b ± 0.1 | 210.1 a ± 3.11 | 947.8 a ± 17.0 | 14.3 a ± 0.2 |
Neutral | 7.1 a,b ± 0.1 | 215.1 a ± 1.76 | 983.5 a,b ± 8.7 | 13.9 a ± 0.1 | |
Neophobic | 6.6 a ± 0.2 | 212.1 a ± 4.18 | 1014.4 b ± 20.9 | 13.6 a ± 0.25 | |
Neophiliac | 7.9 b ± 0.1 | 213.8 a ± 3.2 | 953.3 a ± 16.4 | 14.4 a ± 0.2 | |
24 cm | Neutral | 7.6 a,b ± 0.1 | 218.4 a ± 1.7 | 985.7 a ± 8.5 | 14.1 a ± 0.1 |
Neophobic | 7.2 b± 0.2 | 215.0 a ± 4.27 | 1036 b ± 19.8 | 13.7 a ± 0.25 | |
Neophiliac | 7.4 b ± 0.1 | 211.0 a ± 3.16 | 947.8 a ± 17.2 | 14.2 a ± 0.2 | |
27 cm | Neutral | 7.1 a,b ± 0.1 | 214.6 a ± 1.73 | 981.5 a ± 8.7 | 13.9 a ± 0.1 |
Neophobic | 6.8 a ± 0.2 | 210.1 a ± 4.23 | 1007.7 a ± 20.8 | 13.7 a ± 0.2 | |
31 cm | Neophiliac | 6.8 a ± 0.2 | 203.3 a ± 3.44 | 926.8 a ± 17.6 | 14.3 a ± 0.2 |
Neutral | 6.7 a ± 0.1 | 206.8 a ± 1.84 | 960.7 a ± 8.8 | 13.9 a ± 0.11 | |
Neophobic | 6.3 a ± 0.2 | 205.3 a ± 4.24 | 985.8 a ± 20.6 | 13.7 a ± 0.24 | |
round plate (31 cm) | Neophiliac | 8.1 a ± 0.1 | 211.5 a ± 3.4 | 923.0 a ± 17.9 | 14.4 b ± 0.2 |
Neutral | 7.8 a ± 0.1 | 211.5 a ± 2.1 | 960.1 a ± 10.1 | 14.3 a,b ± 0.1 | |
Neophobic | 7.4 a ± 0.2 | 202.3 a ± 5.1 | 986.7 a ± 25.6 | 13.5 a ± 0.3 | |
square plate | Neophiliac | 8.1 a ± 0.2 | 211.9 a ± 5.2 | 947.4 a ± 26.7 | 14.0 a ± 0.3 |
Neutral | 7.5 a ± 0.2 | 215.3 a.b ± 3.9 | 990.4 a ± 19.6 | 14.2 a ± 0.2 | |
Neophobic | 7.1 a ± 0.3 | 221.8 b ± 8.5 | 1022.0 a ± 40.9 | 13.3 a ± 0.6 | |
rectangular plate | Neophiliac | 7.9 a ± 0.4 | 212.9 a ± 9.7 | 966.8 a ± 51.0 | 14.8 a ± 0.6 |
Neutral | 8.1 a ± 0.2 | 211.9 a ± 5.2 | 947.4 a ± 26.7 | 14.0 a ± 0.3 | |
Neophobic | 7.6 a ± 0.7 | 207.3 a ± 16 | 1019.1 a ± 69.1 | 14.9 a ± 0.8 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Głuchowski, A.; Koteluk, K.; Czarniecka-Skubina, E. Effect of Shape, Size, and Color of the Food Plate on Consumer Perception of Energy Value, Portion Size, Attractiveness, and Expected Price of Dessert. Foods 2024, 13, 2063. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13132063
Głuchowski A, Koteluk K, Czarniecka-Skubina E. Effect of Shape, Size, and Color of the Food Plate on Consumer Perception of Energy Value, Portion Size, Attractiveness, and Expected Price of Dessert. Foods. 2024; 13(13):2063. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13132063
Chicago/Turabian StyleGłuchowski, Artur, Katarzyna Koteluk, and Ewa Czarniecka-Skubina. 2024. "Effect of Shape, Size, and Color of the Food Plate on Consumer Perception of Energy Value, Portion Size, Attractiveness, and Expected Price of Dessert" Foods 13, no. 13: 2063. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13132063
APA StyleGłuchowski, A., Koteluk, K., & Czarniecka-Skubina, E. (2024). Effect of Shape, Size, and Color of the Food Plate on Consumer Perception of Energy Value, Portion Size, Attractiveness, and Expected Price of Dessert. Foods, 13(13), 2063. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13132063