Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 

The article is interesting but some I have some remarks.  

Chapter 2.4 Authors should add the gap value and the type of geometry used in frequency sweep test as well as shear tests.

Line 252: Chapter name should in next line.

It is not clear how Authors calculated the average viscosity, the viscosity depends on the shear rate for non-Newtonian fluids. Thus, it is possible to calculate consistency K or the determine viscosity at selected shear rate but not the average viscosity.

Chapter Conclusions: Some part of text should be moved to Chapter results and discussion. Now chapter Conclusion looks like the abstract, it is more statements than conclusions. This part needs improvement.

The methods used by Authors are correct. Some additional information is required in part related to rheological properties (chapter materials and method). The chapter results and discussion should be improved because some Authors moved the discussion to chapter the Conclusions. The conclusions chapter should recommend the best variant of analysed products, and explain why this variant was selected. The applied methods of treatment and measurement are not novel but the construction of article, the description of results are correct and well analysed. The main drawback of the article is too low number of variants, maybe using the different HP treatment or selecting the different portion of orange juice and kiwi puree to prepare the final juice.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript proposes a method to increase the cloud stability of orange juice treated by high hydrostatic pressure by adding kiwi puree due to the presence of pectin methylsterase inhibitors. In general, the article is well structured and easy to understand, but it requires improvements in some aspects.

The abstract is difficult to understand independently from the rest of the manuscript, especially regarding the purpose of using the kiwi puree. It should be explained that this is used because of the presence of PME inhibitors.

Pg 3 ln 102: the temperature at which the HHP treatment is carried out should be included, as well as the times in which the maximum pressure is reached and also that of depressurization. Also explain the type of container used to treat the juice

Pg 5 Ln 209: Specify how many replicates have been made of each type of sample and treatment for the statistical study of the data

Pg 7 Ln 267: It is mentioned that the juice has been homogenized, but this treatment is not mentioned in the Mat&Met section: describe the way in which the treatment has been carried out, including the temperature and pressure used

Consider reviewing figures 2, 3 and 5, as they include many graphs of different types, especially figure 3. Consider separating these graphs into different figures for better understanding

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx