Research on the Influencing Factors of Sustainable Supply Chain Development of Agri-Food Products Based on Cross-Border Live-Streaming E-Commerce in China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- What are the connotations and characteristics of the sustainable supply chain for cross-border agricultural products in the context of live-streaming e-commerce?
- (2)
- What are the influencing factors for the development of sustainable supply chains for cross-border agricultural products in the context of live-streaming e-commerce?
- (3)
- What is the mechanism of interaction among the influencing factors for the development of sustainable supply chains for cross-border agricultural products in the context of live-streaming e-commerce?
2. Concept Definition and Theoretical Foundation
2.1. Concept Definition and Basic Characteristics
2.2. Theoretical Foundation
3. Methodology
3.1. Data Collection
3.2. Data Coding and Analysis
3.2.1. Open Coding
3.2.2. Principal Axis Encoding
3.2.3. Selective Encoding
3.2.4. Theoretical Saturation Testing
4. Model Explanation and Discussion
4.1. Model Explanation
4.1.1. Core Layer of the Platform
4.1.2. Core Functionalities of a Platform
4.1.3. The Live-Streaming E-Commerce Ecosystem
4.1.4. Association Layer
4.1.5. Demand System
4.1.6. Agricultural Industry Ecology
4.1.7. Support System
4.1.8. The Environmental Layer
4.2. Discussion
4.2.1. Theoretical Implications
4.2.2. Implications for Practice
- Key Implementation Priorities of Development Path
- (1)
- Safeguarding the Business Environment
- (2)
- Innovation Platform Construction
- (3)
- Live-streaming e-commerce Incubation
- (4)
- Cultivating the Agricultural Full Industry Chain
- 2.
- Supportive Measures for Development Path
- (1)
- Strengthening the Credit System
- (2)
- Improving Logistics System Development
- (3)
- Developing Talent Systems
5. Conclusions and Future Research
5.1. Conclusions
- (1)
- The sustainable cross-border agricultural supply chain under the context of livestreaming e-commerce emerges against the backdrop of cross-border agricultural trade development and the rise of live-streaming e-commerce. It represents a significant outcome and manifestation of the deep integration and collaborative development between the new livestreaming e-commerce model and the traditional agricultural product industry supply chain. Its fundamental features include data as a key production element, connecting consumer groups through livestreaming e-commerce channels, a systemic approach involving economics, society, environment, and resilience, with aspects of ubiquity, intelligence, and integration, ultimately achieving sustainable development of live-streaming cross-border agricultural supply chains.
- (2)
- The development of the sustainable cross-border agricultural supply chain under the context of livestreaming e-commerce is influenced by both internal and external factors. The external environment of the supply chain ecosystem (institutional, economic, cultural, market) constitutes its external influencing factors, with two main driving paths: direct impact on the construction of live-streaming cross-border agricultural supply chains and indirect driving of supply chain development through interactions among internal population within the supply chain ecosystem. On the other hand, platform core functions, live-streaming e-commerce ecosystem, agricultural industry ecosystem, demand system, and support system collectively form its internal influencing factors.
- (3)
- Based on the supply chain model and considering China’s national conditions and industrial development status, the implementation focus of the development path for sustainable cross-border agricultural supply chains under the context of live-streaming e-commerce includes safeguarding the business environment, innovative platform construction, live-streaming e-commerce incubation, and comprehensive agricultural industry chain cultivation. Measures to enhance credit, logistics, and talent systems are used as support guarantees, aiming to establish a logically planned and efficiently operating supply chain ecosystem operational mechanism.
5.2. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhou, Z.; Li, Z. Corporate digital transformation and trade credit financing. J. Bus. Res. 2023, 160, 113793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huadong, G. Steps to the digital Silk Road. Nature 2018, 554, 25–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trollman, H.; Jagtap, S.; Trollman, F. Crowdsourcing food security: Introducing food choice derivatives for sustainability. Food Secur. 2023, 15, 953–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pu, M.; Chen, X.; Zhong, Y. Overstocked agricultural produce and emergency supply system in the COVID-19 pandemic: Responses from china. Foods 2021, 10, 3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Y.; Tao, C. Can digital transformation promote enterprise performance?—From the perspective of public policy and innovation. J. Innov. Knowl. 2022, 7, 100198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Luo, X.; Hua, Y.; Benitez, J. Big arena, small potatoes: A mixed-methods investigation of atmospheric cues in live-streaming e-commerce. Decis. Support Syst. 2022, 158, 113801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, H.J.; Lin, L.M. The effects of match-ups on the consumer attitudes toward internet celebrities and their live streaming contents in the context of product endorsement. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 52, 101934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.; Dananjayan, S.; Hou, C.; Guo, Q.; Luo, S.; He, Y. A survey on the 5G network and its impact on agriculture: Challenges and opportunities. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 180, 105895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.Y.; Chen, W.H.; Luo, B.I. How Capital Entering Rural Areas Can Drive Farmers’ Operation: An Analysis Based on the Green Energy Model in Jiangxi Province. Agric. Econ. Issues 2021, 2021, 69–81. [Google Scholar]
- Ren, Z. Research on the Live Broadcast Operation Strategy of agri-food products E-commerce. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1992, 042054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.L.; Dai, P.J. Research on Supply Chain Logistics Management in Agricultural Industrialization. Bus. Res. 2006, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rana, R.L.; Bux, C.; Lombardi, M. Carbon footprint of the globe artichoke supply chain in Southern Italy: From agricultural production to industrial processing. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 391, 136240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Downey, W.D. The challenge of food and agri products supply chains. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Chain Management in Agri-and Food Business, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 30–31 May 1996; Trienekens, J.H., Zuurbier, P.J.P., Eds.; Department of Management Studies, Wageningen Agricultural University: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1996; pp. 3–13. [Google Scholar]
- Du, J.G.; Pu, T.F.; Zhu, X.W. Research on coordination of green agri-food products supply chain under dual uncertainty of production and demand. Ecol. Econ. 2021, 37, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
- Behzadi, G.; O’Sullivan, M.J.; Olsen, T.L.; Zhang, A. Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models. Omega 2018, 79, 21–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.; Li, L.; Sun, Z.; Feng, X.; Lin, N.; Ruan, J. An integrative decision-making model for the Internet of Things-enabled supply chains of fresh agri-product. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2023, 61, 4358–4373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, S.; Powell, W.; Foth, M.; Natanelov, V.; Miller, T.; Dulleck, U. Strengthening consumer trust in beef supply chain traceability with a blockchain-based human-machine reconcile mechanism. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 180, 105886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sui, B.W.; Tan, X. Factors Affecting the Vulnerability of Cross Border agri-food products Supply Chains: An Empirical Analysis Based on China ASEAN. China Circ. Econ. 2019, 33, 66–73. [Google Scholar]
- Sui, B.W.; Zhuang, L.J. Cross border agri-food products supply chain: The cornerstone of the development of China ASEAN agri-food products circulation industry. China Circ. Econ. 2016, 30, 67–74. [Google Scholar]
- Serfas, D.; Gray, R.; Slade, P. Congestion and distribution of rents in wheat export sector: A Canada–US cross-border comparison. Can. J. Agric. Econ./Rev. Can. D’Agroecon. 2018, 66, 187–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abula, K.; Abula, B.; Hu, Q.; Chen, X.; Wang, D. Research on the High-Quality Development Path of the Cross-Border Agricultural Product Supply Chain between China and Central Asia. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, C.Y. Research on Several Optimization Issues of Cross-border Supply Chain Networks; Beijing Jiaotong University: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- John, E. Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ. Qual. Manag. 2020, 8, 37–51. [Google Scholar]
- Plambeck, E.; Lee, H.L.; Yatsko, P. Improving environmental performance in your Chinese supply chain. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2011. Available online: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/improving-environmental-performance-in-your-chinese-supply-chain/ (accessed on 21 December 2022).
- Minnens, F.; Luijckx, N.L.; Verbeke, W. Food Supply Chain Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Sharing Information to Detect and Prevent Food Integrity Issues. Foods 2019, 8, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tsolakis, N.; Niedenzu, D.; Simonetto, M.; Dora, M.; Kumar, M. Supply network design to address United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: A case study of blockchain implementation in Thai fish industry. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 131, 495–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Um, J.; Han, N. Understanding the relationships between global supply chain risk and supply chain resilience: The role of mitigating strategies. Supply Chain. Manag. Int. J. 2021, 26, 240–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y. Yi’an County: Rebuilding the agricultural industry chain with digitization. China Urban and Rural Finance News, 14 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Faggioni, F.; Rossi, M.V.; Sestino, A. Supply Chain Resilience in the Pharmaceutical Industry: A Qualitative Analysis from Scholarly and Managerial Perspectives. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2023, 18, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Jiang, W.; Li, Y.; Guo, J. The Influences of Live Streaming Affordance in Cross-Border E-Commerce Platforms: An Information Transparency Perspective. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 2021, 30, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elia, S.; Giuffrida, M.; Mariani, M.M.; Bresciani, S. Resources and digital export: An RBV perspective on the role of digital technologies and capabilities in cross-border e-commerce. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 132, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davenport, T.H.; Redman, T.C. Digital Transformation Comes down to Talent in 4 Key Areas[EB/OL]. 21 May 2020. Available online: https://hbr.org/2020/05/digital-transformation-comes-down-to-talent-in-4-key-areas (accessed on 20 February 2023).
- Gontard, N.; Sonesson, U.; Birkved, M.; Majone, M.; Bolzonella, D.; Celli, A.; Angellier-Coussy, H.; Jang, G.-W.; Verniquet, A.; Broeze, J.; et al. A research challenge vision regarding management of agricultural waste in a circular bio-based economy. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 48, 614–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tolstoy, D.; Nordman, E.R.; Hånell, S.M.; Özbek, N. The development of international e-commerce in retail SMEs: An effectuation perspective. J. World Bus. 2020, 56, 101165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saeed, M.A.; Kersten, W. Drivers of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Identification and Classification. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bager, S.L.; Lambin, E.F. Sustainability strategies by companies in the global coffee sector. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 3555–3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.X. Research on the legal protection of intellectual property rights of cross-border e-commerce agri-food products. China Bus. Rev. 2021, 8, 7–9. [Google Scholar]
- Parra-Paitan, C.; zu Ermgassen, E.K.; Meyfroidt, P.; Verburg, P.H. Large gaps in voluntary sustainability commitments covering the global cocoa trade. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2023, 81, 102696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranta, V.; Aarikka-Stenroos, L.; Mäkinen, S.J. Creating value in the circular economy: A structured multiple-case analysis of business models. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 201, 988–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mastos, T.D.; Nizamis, A.; Vafeiadis, T.; Alexopoulos, N.; Ntinas, C.; Gkortzis, D.; Tzovaras, D. Industry 4.0 sustainable supply chains: An application of an IoT enabled scrap metal management solution. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 269, 122377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mastos, T.D.; Nizamis, A.; Terzi, S.; Gkortzis, D.; Papadopoulos, A.; Tsagkalidis, N.; Tzovaras, D. Introducing an application of an industry 4.0 solution for circular supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 300, 126886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zabaniotou, A.; Kamaterou, P. Food waste valorisation advocating circular bioeconomy—A critical review of potentialities and perspectives of spent coffee grounds biorefinery. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 211, 1553–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govindan, K.; Hasanagic, M. A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: A supply chain perspective. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 56, 278–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, X.S.; Yu, J.Y.; Dai, R.W. A New Field of Science? Open Complex Giant Systems and Their Methodology. Nat. Mag. 1991, 13, 3–10. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development AnnexA/RES/70/1. 2015. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (accessed on 25 September 2022).
- Glaser, B.G. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory; Sociology Press: Mill Valley, CA, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Strauss, A.L. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.D.; Tong, N.N. Research on the collaborative mechanism between data and other production factors in the context of the digital economy. E-Government 2020, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mindruta, D.; Moeen, M.; Agarwal, R. A two-sided matching approach for partner selection and assessing complementarities in partners’ attributes in inter-firm alliances. Strateg. Manag. J. 2016, 37, 206–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Li, X.; Zhu, H.; Zhao, Y. Influencing factors of livestream selling of fresh food based on a push-pull model: A two-stage approach combining structural equation modeling (SEM) and artificial neural network (ANN). Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 212, 118799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lezoche, M.; Hernandez, J.E.; Díaz, M.D.M.E.A.; Panetto, H.; Kacprzyk, J. Agri-food 4.0: A survey of the supply chains and technologies for the future agriculture. Comput. Ind. 2020, 117, 103187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuang, Y.H. On Ecological Laws. Sci. News 2008, 15, 46–48. [Google Scholar]
- Moore, J.F. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1993, 71, 75–86. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.F.; Garnsey, E. Policy-driven ecosystems for new vaccine development. Technovation 2014, 34, 762–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, J.F. The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems; HarperCollins: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, B.H. Design and Application of agri-food products Cross-border E-commerce Talent Training Scheme Based on BP Neural Network. Microcomput. Appl. 2020, 36, 145–148. [Google Scholar]
- Ding, J. Analysis of the Characteristics and Constraints of China’s Cross-border E-commerce agri-food products Trade De-velopment. Foreign Econ. Trade Pract. 2016, 4, 36–39. [Google Scholar]
- Wheelwright, S.C.; Clark, K.B. Creating Project Plans to Focus Product Development; Harvard Business School Pub: Boston, MA, USA, 1992; pp. 70–82. [Google Scholar]
- Kenney, M.; Zysman, J. The platform economy: Restructuring the space of capitalist accumulation. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2020, 13, 55–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J. Platform Economics—Theory and Practice of Platform Competition; Shanghai Jiaotong University Press: Shanghai, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Gawer, A.; Cusumano, M.A. Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2014, 31, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williamson, P.J.; De Meyer, A. Ecosystem Advantage: How to Successfully Harness the Power of Partners. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2012, 55, 24–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tee, R.; Gawer, A. Industry architecture as a determinant of successful platform strategies: A case study of the i-mode mobile Internet service. Eur. Manag. Rev. 2009, 6, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schouten, J.W. Selves in Transition: Symbolic Consumption in Personal Rites of Passage and Identity Reconstruction. J. Consum. Res. 1991, 17, 412–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Celsi, R.L.; Rose, R.L.; Leigh, T.W. An Exploration of High-Risk Leisure Consumption Through Skydiving. J. Consum. Res. 1993, 20, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flint, D.J.; Larsson, E.; Gammelgaard, B.; Mentzer, J.T. Logistics innovation: A customer value-oriented social process. J. Bus. Logist. 2005, 26, 113–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pettit, S.; Beresford, A. Critical success factors in the context of humanitarian aid supply chains. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2009, 39, 450–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belk, R.W. Extended Self and Extending Paradigmatic Perspective. J. Consum. Res. 1989, 16, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suddaby, R. From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not. Acad. Manag. J. 2006, 49, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pratt, M.G. From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Acad. Manag. J. 2009, 52, 856–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.G.; Liu, W.; Liu, X.Q.; Zhao, J.L. Research on cross-border e-commerce between China and Russia based on grounded theoretical methods. China Soft Sci. 2015, 9, 27–40. [Google Scholar]
- Walter, L. Public Opinion; Yan, K.; Jiang, H., Translators; Shanghai People’s Publishing House: Shanghai, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Eisenhardt, K.M. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1989, 14, 532–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omar, A.; Davis-Sramek, B.; Fugate, B.S.; Mentzer, J.T. Exploring the Complex Social Processes of Organizational Change: Supply Chain Orientation from a Manager’s Perspective. J. Bus. Logist. 2012, 33, 4–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quarshie, A.M.; Leuschner, R. Interorganizational interaction in disaster response networks: A government perspective. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2020, 56, 3–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.G.; Han, W.; He, S.N.; Zhang, J.W. Research on the Generation Model of Asset Light Fission New Ventures: An Exploration Based on Rooted Theoretical Methods. Nankai Manag. Rev. 2019, 22, 117–129. [Google Scholar]
- Hirschman, E.C. Humanistic Inquiry in Marketing Research: Philosophy, Method, and Criteria. J. Mark. Res. 1986, 23, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaufmann, L.; Denk, N. How to demonstrate rigor when presenting grounded theory research in the supply chain management literature. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2011, 47, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lincoln, Y.; Guba, E.G. Naturalistic Inquiry; Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, CA, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Autry, C.W.; Bobbitt, L.M. Supply chain security orientation: Conceptual development and a proposed framework. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2008, 19, 42–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McHugh, M.L. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem. Med. 2012, 22, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Pagell, M. Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management. J. Oper. Manag. 2010, 29, 577–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCracken, G. The Long Interview; Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, CA, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Strauss, A.L.; Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques; Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Ronadner, R.K. Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance In New Technology Generations. Strateg. Manag. J. 2010, 31, 306–333. [Google Scholar]
- Hauptman, O. Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation. Innovation 2003, 5, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perrons, R.K. The open kimono: How Intel balances trust and power to maintain platform leadership. Res. Policy 2009, 38, 1300–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, T.; Sao, A.; Fernandes, K.J.; Tiwari, M.K.; Kim, D.Y. A hybrid model of component sharing and platform modularity for optimal product family design. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2013, 51, 614–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Kim, M.; Choi, J.; Trivedi, M. Offline social interactions and online shopping demand: Does the degree of social interactions matter? J. Bus. Res. 2019, 99, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, Y.J. Agri-food products+Live Broadcasting. Reverse Supply Chain. Model Research. Price Theory Pract. 2020, 7, 129–132. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, X. Industrial symbiosis: Theoretical definition and internal mechanism. China Ind. Econ. 2008, 246, 118–128. [Google Scholar]
- Van Alstyne, M.W.; Parker, G.G.; Choudary, S.P. Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2016, 94, 54–62. [Google Scholar]
- Bonatti, A.; Cisternas, G. Consumer Scores and Price Discrimination. Rev. Econ. Stud. 2019, 87, 750–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, Z.F.; Lu, J.; Liu, C. Dynamics of Technology Learning of Economic Entities in Agricultural Cluster. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Systems Science, Management Science & System Dynamics, Shanghai, China, 29–30 May 2009; Volume 3, pp. 131–134. [Google Scholar]
- Shepherd, M.; A Turner, J.; Small, B.; Wheeler, D. Priorities for science to overcome hurdles thwarting the full promise of the ‘digital agriculture’ revolution. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 100, 5083–5092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gan, W.; Zhang, T.; Zhu, Y. On Countermeasures of Promoting agri-food products’ E–Commerce in China. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture, Nanchang, China, 22–25 October 2010; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 579–586. [Google Scholar]
- Burer, S.; Jones, P.C.; Lowe, T.J. Coordinating the supply chain in the agricultural seed industry. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 185, 354–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters, L.D. Heteropathic versus homopathic resource integration and value co-creation in service ecosystems. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 2999–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiwana, A.; Konsynski, B.; Bush, A.A. Research Commentary: Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics. Inf. Syst. Res. 2010, 21, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossain, M.A.; Quaddus, M. Developing and validating a hierarchical model of external responsiveness: A study on RFID technology. Inf. Syst. Front. 2014, 17, 109–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, H.; Gao, Z.; Yang, X.; Jiang, X. Modeling pedestrian violation behavior at signalized crosswalks in China: A hazards-based duration approach. Traffic Inj. Prev. 2011, 12, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Li, C. Differences between the formation of tourism purchase intention and the formation of actual behavior: A meta-analytic review. Tour. Manag. 2022, 91, 104527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J. Diverse Institutional Environments and Product Innovation of Emerging Market Firms. Manag. Int. Rev. 2013, 53, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhavani, R.V.; Gopinath, R. The COVID19 pandemic crisis and the relevance of a farm-system-for-nutrition approach. Food Secur. 2020, 12, 881–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, S.; Guo, X.; Zhang, H. New driving force for China’s import growth: Assessing the role of cross-border e-commerce. World Econ. 2021, 44, 3674–3706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosenbaum, M.S.; Russell-Bennett, R. Developing substantive theories into formal theories via disruption. J. Serv. Mark. 2019, 33, 572–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bressanelli, G.; Perona, M.; Saccani, N. Challenges in supply chain redesign for the Circular Economy: A literature review and a multiple case study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 57, 7395–7422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barreiro-Gen, M.; Lozano, R. How circular is the circular economy? Analysing the implementation of circular economy in organisations. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2020, 29, 3484–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cutolo, D.; Kenney, M. Platform-Dependent Entrepreneurs: Power Asymmetries, Risks, and Strategies in the Platform Economy. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2021, 35, 584–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, X.; Liu, H.Y.; Hu, S.Y. Research on the impact of live streaming mode on e-commerce supply chain pricing and quality decision-making—A comparative analysis based on two modes of manufacturer’s store self-broadcast and commissioned anchor delivery. Price Theory Pract. 2022, 459, 154–157+207. [Google Scholar]
- Sajjad, A.; Eweje, G.; Tappin, D. Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Motivators and Barriers. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2015, 24, 643–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faisal, M.N. Sustainable supply chains: A study of interaction among the enablers. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 2010, 16, 508–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wittstruck, D.; Teuteberg, F. Understanding the Success Factors of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Empirical Evidence from the Electrics and Electronics Industry. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2012, 19, 141–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grimm, J.H.; Hofstetter, J.S.; Sarkis, J. Critical factors for sub-supplier management: A sustainable food supply chains perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014, 152, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, G.G.; Van Alstyne, M.W.; Choudary, S.P. Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You; W. W. Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Van Dijck, J. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.; Ding, Z.B. Agri-food products E-commerce Ecosystem: A Theoretical Analysis Framework. China Rural. Obs. 2015, 4, 39–48+70+96. [Google Scholar]
- Kenney, M.; Zysman, J. The rise of the platform economy. Issues Sci. Technol. 2016, 32, 61. [Google Scholar]
- Van Dijck, J.; Poell, T.; De Waal, M. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- GB-T 19000-2016; Quality Management Systems—Fundamentals and Vocabulary. Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2016.
Concept | Connotations | Characteristics |
---|---|---|
Agri-food Products Supply Chain | Based on the core agricultural enterprises, the sustainable supply chain for cross-border agricultural products is a networked system that connects various participants, including producers, consumers, and numerous intermediary entities. This system effectively controls the flow of funds, materials, and information, enabling smooth and value-added processes. |
|
Cross-border Agri-food Products Supply Chain | A cross-border supply chain network is formed by leveraging core agricultural enterprises involved in agriculture and foreign trade in different countries or regions. This network covers the entire process of agricultural production, processing, distribution, and trade. It operates through the flow of information, materials, and funds, facilitating the seamless coordination and integration of various stages in the supply chain. |
|
The Sustainable Supply Chain of Agri-food Products | A supply chain system based on digital information technology and led by the core enterprises is established by integrating and coordinating various elements of each node in the entire supply chain. Its purpose is to achieve sustainable and coordinated development in the economic, social, and environmental dimensions and enhance the overall resilience of the supply chain to internal and external risks. |
|
The Sustainable Supply Chain of Cross-border Agri-food Products in the Context of Live-streaming E-commerce | The supply chain ecosystem, formed with the support of core enterprises involved in agriculture and foreign trade, leverages modern information technology to enable distribution through live-streaming e-commerce channels, driven by authentic demand and supported by socialized services. This ecosystem, governed by the control of financial flow, material flow, and information flow, enables the maximization of overall supply chain efficiency and multidimensional sustainable coordination and development. |
|
Original Statement | Conceptualization | Categorize |
---|---|---|
The company has invested over one million yuan to establish a new production and processing line, making it the only vinegar pepper processing factory in Batang with SC quality certification. | Integration of the Primary and Secondary Industries (a1) | Industrial Integration (A1) |
Yunfu City showcases the achievements of rural revitalization and the new development of rural tourism by hosting the Food Festival (Sweet Potato Festival) in conjunction with the Harvest Festival, highlighting the implementation of rural revitalization efforts. | Integration of the Primary and Tertiary Industries (a2) | |
The city has successfully completed the construction of two demonstration zones for apple and grape production, and various agricultural production bases have established an integrated supply chain system that covers the entire process from production to supply and marketing for agricultural products. | Industrial Clusters (a3) | Industrial Development (A2) |
Deqing County has collaborated with Top Cloud Farm and JD.com to establish a smart agriculture demonstration site for early bamboo shoots, aiming to create an integrated information platform for the entire early bamboo shoots industry chain. The platform incorporates smart production, remote monitoring, scientific management, and other functionalities. | Industrial Transformation and Upgrading (a4) | |
Chinese agricultural products face challenges such as the lack of alignment between production standards and international standards. Additionally, different rules and regulations of cross-border e-commerce platforms in various countries and regions create obstacles, resulting in many agricultural products being unable to be directly sold through cross-border e-commerce platforms. | Standardization Construction (a5) | |
Efforts are being made to build a regional brand, “Chagan Lake,” known for its green and organic products. The focus is on developing e-commerce direct sales and leveraging the popularity of live-streaming platforms to promote and sell these products. | Brand Cultivation (a6) | |
Promoting Thai coconut products on Chinese social media platforms, including organizing promotional activities during important Chinese festivals, to capture the attention of consumers and generate interest in the products. | Social Media Marketing (a7) | Marketing Funnel Strategies (A3) |
The Winter Fair is an important platform for showcasing Hainan’s rural development achievements and effectively connecting poverty alleviation efforts with rural revitalization. It plays a significant role in promoting agricultural exchange and cooperation between the Hainan Free Trade Port and countries and regions along the Belt and Road Initiative. | Outbound Marketing (a8) | |
The Foreign Affairs Office of Nanning City, Guangxi, together with the Consulates General of Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam in Nanning, jointly organized the “Consuls General Online Live Streaming Sales Event” during the month of March. | Influencer Marketing (a9) | |
The third China International Import Expo (CIIE) pays more attention to the integration of online and offline activities, actively exploring the “cloud-based” exhibition and participation model. | Online and Offline Integration (a10) |
Main Category | Corresponding Category | Connotations of Category |
---|---|---|
Agricultural Industry Ecosystem | Industrial Integration | The degree of integration between the supply-side primary, secondary, and tertiary industries affects the operation of the supply system. |
Industrial Development | The level of industrial development in terms of supply-side industry clustering, transformation and upgrading, standardization construction, and brand cultivation affects the operation of the supply system. | |
Core Functionalities of the Platform | Integrated Empowerment Services | The performance of platform core functions is influenced by the functionality of cross-border e-commerce service platforms along the supply chain, the establishment of digital agricultural support systems, and the availability of data support throughout the entire process. |
Platform Development | The performance of platform core functions is influenced by the platform’s reputation, autonomy, and decentralization. | |
Live E-commerce Ecosystem | Marketing and Lead Generation Strategies | The choice of marketing and traffic acquisition methods can impact the operation of the live-streaming e-commerce ecosystem. |
Industry Competition and Cooperation | Competition among cross-border live-streaming e-commerce giants and interactions between the internet, agriculture, and other industries can influence the operation of the live-streaming e-commerce ecosystem. | |
Comprehensive Services | The comprehensive services provided by ecosystem participants, such as platform regulation, after-sales services, and continuous interaction, can impact the operation of the live-streaming e-commerce ecosystem. | |
Support System | Credit System | The soundness of the supply chain credit system can impact the support system. |
Payment System | The robustness of the supply chain payment system can affect the support system. | |
Logistics Support | The level of improvement in the supply chain logistics system can impact the support system. | |
Talent Development/Training | The effectiveness of supply chain talent development can impact the support system. | |
Demand System | Consumer Transformation | The degree of transformation in shopping patterns and consumer attitudes on the demand side can impact the demand system. |
Consumer Preferences | The demand inclination of consumers towards goods can affect the demand system. | |
External Environment | Institutional Environment | Government policies, regulations, and streamlined processes can influence the external environment of the live-streaming cross-border sustainable agricultural supply chain. |
Economic Environment | Economic cooperation and the level of economic development can impact the external environment of the live-streaming cross-border sustainable agricultural supply chain. | |
Cultural Environment | Cultural heterogeneity, cultural identity, and religious beliefs can influence the external environment of the live-streaming cross-border sustainable agricultural supply chain. | |
Market Environment | Market influence and international market barriers, among other market factors, can impact the external environment of the live-streaming cross-border sustainable agricultural supply chain. |
Trustworthiness Criteria | Method of Addressing Criteria in This Study |
---|---|
Credibility: The extent to which the results appear to represent the data |
|
Transferability: The extent to which the findings from one study in one context will apply to other contexts |
|
Dependability: The extent to which the findings are unique to time and place; the stability or consistency of explanations |
|
Confirmability: The extent to which interpretations are the result of the participants and the phenomenon as opposed to researcher biases |
|
Integrity: The extent to which interpretations are influenced by misinformation or evasions by participants |
|
Fit: The extent to which findings fit with the substantive area under investigation |
|
Generality: The extent to which findings discover multiple aspects of the phenomenon. |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, G.; Zhang, Z.; Li, S.; Shin, C. Research on the Influencing Factors of Sustainable Supply Chain Development of Agri-Food Products Based on Cross-Border Live-Streaming E-Commerce in China. Foods 2023, 12, 3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12173323
Wang G, Zhang Z, Li S, Shin C. Research on the Influencing Factors of Sustainable Supply Chain Development of Agri-Food Products Based on Cross-Border Live-Streaming E-Commerce in China. Foods. 2023; 12(17):3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12173323
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Gaofeng, Zihao Zhang, Shuai Li, and Changhoon Shin. 2023. "Research on the Influencing Factors of Sustainable Supply Chain Development of Agri-Food Products Based on Cross-Border Live-Streaming E-Commerce in China" Foods 12, no. 17: 3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12173323