Next Article in Journal
Production and Characterization of Heme Iron Polypeptide from the Blood of Skipjack Tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) Using Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Food Supplement Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanism of Synergistic Photoinactivation Utilizing Curcumin and Lauric Arginate Ethyl Ester against Escherichia coli and Listeria innocua
Previous Article in Journal
Quality Characteristics and Antioxidant Activities of Six Types of Korean White Wine
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 12
Issue 17
10.3390/foods12173247
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antibacterial Effect of Pomegranate Juice on Listeria innocua and E. coli in Different Media

by
Zhaojun Ban
1,
Lihua Fan
2,*,
Jun Song
2,
Sherry Fillmore
2 and
Junfeng Guan
3
1
School of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
2
Kentville Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 32 Main Street, Kentville, NS B4N 1J5, Canada
3
Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050050, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(17), 3247; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12173247
Submission received: 26 July 2023 / Revised: 25 August 2023 / Accepted: 26 August 2023 / Published: 29 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Studies of Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Food Bioactive Compounds)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The antibacterial effect of pomegranate juice (PJ) at six concentrations (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50%) against Listeria innocua and Escherichia coli was investigated in distilled water (DW) and bacterial culture broth. L. innocua and E. coli at approximately 105 cfu mL−1 were inoculated in PJ samples and incubated at 4, 25, and 37 °C for 0, 6, 24, and 48 h. The bacterial population and pH of culture media were measured at each removal. Results indicated that the antibacterial effect of PJ was dependent upon bacteria species, juice concentration, incubation temperature, and growth medium. Higher juice concentration and incubation temperature resulted in increased antibacterial effects. Bacterial populations were decreased more significantly in DW systems than in the culture broth, while L. innocua was more sensitive to PJ than E. coli in the DW systems. Regardless of PJ concentrations in DW systems, L. innocua, initially inoculated at approximately 105 cfu mL−1, was reduced to undetectable levels at 25 and 37 °C within 24 h. The growth of L. innocua and E. coli was significantly inhibited in bacterial culture broth containing ≥ 20% PJ (p < 0.001). This study provides insight into the potential application of PJ in food and beverage products for food protection.

1. Introduction

The fruit of pomegranate (Punica granatum) comprises peel containing polyphenols, minerals, and complex polysaccharides. The edible portion of pomegranates contains organic acids, sugars, vitamins, polysaccharides, polyphenols, and minerals, although the chemical composition of the fruit varies depending on the cultivar, environmental conditions, maturity, and postharvest treatments [1,2,3]. Pomegranates have become a valuable fruit because of the potential health-promoting benefits of their bioactive compounds, including tannins, flavonoids, alkaloids, organic acids, triterpenes, and steroids in different parts of the fruit. Pomegranate fruits are moderate in taste, with sour notes from the acidic ellagitannins contained in the juice. The most abundant phytochemicals in pomegranate juice are polyphenols, including the hydrolyzable tannins called ellagitannins, formed when ellagic acid and gallic acid bind with a carbohydrate to form pomegranate ellagitannins, also known as punicalagins [3]. The red color of the juice is attributed to anthocyanins. In recent years, pomegranate juice (PJ) has gained popularity among consumers for its antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral properties [3,4,5,6].
Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli are regarded as significant causes of foodborne illness and have been a major concern for consumers and the food industry. L. monocytogenes, a Gram-positive pathogen, is able to grow at refrigerator temperatures, causing contamination for many fresh and processed food products [7]. This bacterium is responsible for the disease listeriosis, which has a high mortality rate [8]. L. innocua, a surrogate for L. monocytogenes, is non-hemolytic and non-pathogenic and can be found with L. monocytogenes in the same food or processing environment. Due to their high phenotypic similarity, L. innocua is often used as an indicator for L. monocytogenes [9,10]. E. coli O157:H7, a Gram-negative pathogen, is a foodborne pathogen exceptionally tolerant of acid pH and can survive at pH 3–4 [11,12]. E. coli can be found in a wide variety of foods and is regarded as an indicator of bacterial contaminants of fecal origin for quality assurance of municipal water and other food products [13,14].
Adding chemical preservatives to foods can reduce the risk of microbiological contamination. However, consumers have been demanding natural, healthy, and safe foods. The growing demand for developing natural antimicrobials is in response to the perceived risks associated with chemical residues in food [15,16,17]. Food product manufacturers are interested in utilizing natural plant-derived preservatives to inhibit bacteria such as Listeria spp. and E. coli as a means to reduce the use of synthetic additives and ensure food safety with extended shelf life [4,18]. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to investigate the antimicrobial effects of pomegranate juice at different concentrations against L. innocua and E. coli and determine the treatment effects in distilled water (DW) and bacterial culture broth systems at different temperatures.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Pomegranate Juice

Commercially processed 100% PJ (not from concentrate) without any food additives or preservatives was obtained from a local grocery supplier (Atlantic Superstore, New Minas, NS, Canada) and stored at 4 °C until use. Soluble solid content of PJ was measured using a digital hand-held refractometer (Model “Pocket PAL-1”, Atago® Co., Inc., Tokyo, Japan), where approximately 0.3 mL of juice was placed onto the prism surface of the refractometer. Titratable acidity (TA) of PJ was measured with 0.5 N NaOH using the Metrohm Model 848 Titrino Plus (Herisau, Switzerland) expressed in citric acid equivalents TA (%). The pH of PJ was measured using a pH meter (Accumet Basic AB15, Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA). Total phenolic content (gallic acid equivalent) was determined using Folin-Ciocalteu Reagent, and gallic acid was used as standard [19].

2.2. Preparation of Bacterial Strains

L. innocua (ATCC33090) and E. coli (ATCC10798) were stored at −86 °C in Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI) (Becton Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA) or Tryptone Soya Broth (TSB) (Oxoid Ltd., Hampshire, UK) containing 15% glycerol, respectively until use. Prior to the experiment, the working cultures were prepared by sub-culturing 100 µL of L. innocua stock culture in 10 mL BHI and 100 µL E. coli in 10 mL TSB, then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The working cultures were centrifuged at 11,500× g for 10 min, supernatants were removed, and bacterial cells were washed with sterile water then centrifuged again. The resulting pellets were made up to a 5 mL volume with sterile water and used for L. innocua or E. coli inoculum. Each inoculum was serially diluted and spiral plated in duplicate on BHI or TSB agar using a WASP 2 (Don Whitley Scientific Ltd., Bingley, UK) spiral plater and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h for enumeration of total population counts of inoculum. For each repeat, the new working cultures were prepared as described above to keep consistent bacterial populations of initial inoculum.

2.3. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity of six concentrations of PJ was investigated in bacterial culture broth and sterilized distilled water (DW) systems. At each concentration level, an appropriate volume of juice was added to the culture broth or DW in a sterile test tube to a final volume of 10 mL. The final concentrations of PJ were 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50% (v/v). Each tube was then inoculated to obtain an initial inoculum level of approximately 105 cfu mL−1. The samples were shaken well and incubated at 4, 25, or 37 °C to represent cold storage temperature, room temperature, and optimum bacterial growth temperature, respectively. The bacterial population was measured at 0, 6, 24, and 48 h following inoculation. At each sampling time, an aliquot of each sample was serially diluted with 0.1% sterile peptone water (PW, Difco, Becton Dickinson and Company, MD, USA), and the appropriate dilution was spiral plated onto the BHI or TSB agar using the 100 µL mode of the spiral plate system, WASP2 for enumeration of L. innocua and E. coli, respectively. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, visible colonies of L. innocua and E. coli on the surface of the BHI or TSB agar plates were counted using the aCOLyte colony counter (Synbiosis, Cambridge, UK).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The experimental design was a completely randomized 2 × 2 × 6 × 3 × 4 factorial with two bacteria species (L. innocua and E. coli), two culture media (bacteria culture broth and DW), six juice concentrations (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50%), three incubation temperatures (4, 25, and 37 °C), and four removal times (0, 6, 24, and 48 h). Bacterial populations in this study were expressed as log cfu mL−1. Data were analyzed using the ANOVA directive and standard errors of mean (SEM) option of GenStat® (12th Edition, VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, UK). All experiments were replicated three times.

3. Results

3.1. Basic Chemical Contents of Pomegranate Juice

The chemical properties of 100% PJ used in our study were measured. The soluble solid content was 16 Brix (%), titratable acidity (TA) was 0.91% ± 0.10, pH value was 3.32 ± 0.07, and total phenolic content (gallic acid equivalent) was 1717.04 mg GAE l−1.

3.2. Antibacterial Effect of PJ against L. innocua in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) Broth System

At 37 °C incubation temperature, PJ concentrations at 20, 30, 40, and 50% (v/v) in the BHI broth had a significant inhibitory effect on the growth of L. innocua (Figure 1a), where the bacterial populations were at 3.8, 4.1, 3.5, 2.5 logs, respectively, compared to the control of 8.6 log cfu mL−1 over the 48 h incubation. However, with PJ concentrations of 10% in the BHI broth, the growth of L. innocua followed the typical bacterial growth curve and reached 8.5 log cfu mL−1 after 24 h incubation, even though the bacterial population in the 10% PJ was slightly lower than that of the control at 6 and 24 h incubation.
At 25 °C incubation temperature, the bacterial growth curves were similar to that of 37 °C for the PJ concentrations of 0 and 10%, with the population in the 10% suspension being lower than that of the 0% (control) at 6 and 24 h incubation (Figure 1b). Again, for treatments with PJ concentrations of 20, 30, 40, and 50%, the L. innocua counts were 4.6, 4.8, 4.7, and 4.6 logs, respectively, compared to the control of 9.03 log cfu mL−1 following 48 h at 25 °C, suggesting the strong inhibitory effects of PJ on L. innocua.
At 4 °C incubation temperature, there was no change in the population of L. innocua in 0, 10, and 20% PJ over time (Table 1). There was a slight decrease in the population in the 30, 40, and 50% PJ concentrations compared with control during the 48 h incubation.

3.3. Antibacterial Effect of PJ against L. innocua in DW System

The response of L. innocua to the concentrations of PJ suspended in distilled water was different from that of PJ added in BHI. At 25 and 37 °C incubation temperatures, the populations of L. innocua were decreased to undetectable levels (<10 cfu mL−1) within 24 h at PJ concentrations ≥ 10% in distilled water (Figure 1c,d), suggesting an effective killing effect of PJ on L. innocua. At 4 °C, the population of L. innocua was also decreased by up to 1.5 or 3.3 logs following 6 or 24 h treatment, respectively, and was further reduced to undetectable levels within 48 h by PJ concentrations tested (Table 1).

3.4. Antibacterial Effect of PJ against E. coli in Tryptone Soya Broth (TSB) System

At 37 °C incubation temperature, the concentrations of PJ at 20, 30, 40, and 50% in the TSB suspension had a significant inhibitory effect on the growth of E. coli (Figure 2a). E. coli was counted at 5.0, 3.4, 1.7, and <1 log cfu mL−1, respectively, in comparison to 9.3 log cfu mL−1 in the control following 48 h incubation duration. In the control and 10% PJ concentration, the growth of E. coli followed the typical bacterial growth curve over the 48 h incubation, but the population in the 10% suspension remained lower than that of the control after incubation. We found that for the treatment with 20% PJ in TSB, the E. coli population did not change over time compared with the initial population inoculated at 5 log cfu mL−1, indicating an inhibitory effect rather than killing the bacteria. The killing effect was shown at PJ concentrations of 30, 40, and 50%, and the E. coli population was reduced significantly (p < 0.001) over time. The 50% PJ concentration resulted in the greatest reduction of E. coli to an undetectable level after 48 h incubation.
At 25 °C incubation temperature, the change in the E. coli population was similar to that of 37 °C for the concentrations of 0 and 10% (Figure 2b). Overall, for treatments with PJ concentrations of 20, 30, 40, and 50%, the E. coli growth was inhibited, and bacterial counts were determined at 5.1, 4.8, 4.6, and 3.7 logs, respectively, compared to 9.1 log cfu mL−1 in the control after 48 h incubation. It was found that PJ concentrations of 20, 30, and 40% had similar inhibitory effects on the E. coli population over time.
At 4 °C incubation temperature, there was no change in the population of E. coli in the 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40% concentrations over time (Table 1). Compared to the control, only a 0.3 log cfu mL−1 decrease was found in the E. coli population following treatment with 50% PJ for 48 h.

3.5. Antibacterial Effect of PJ against E. coli in DW System

The population of E. coli responded differently in the distilled water system compared to that in TSB. At 37 °C incubation temperature, there was a slight change in the population of E. coli inoculated in the 0% juice (control) over 48 h (Figure 2c). However, after PJ juice ≥ 10% was added to the DW system, the E. coli population significantly decreased over time compared with the control (p < 0.001). Furthermore, E. coli populations decreased to undetectable levels (<10 cfu mL−1) after being treated with PJ at concentrations ≥ 20% for 48 h.
At 25 °C incubation temperature, there were only slight changes in the population of E. coli inoculated in the control or 10% juice suspension over 48 h in distilled water (Figure 2d). The E. coli population decreased over time at the 20, 30, 40, and 50% concentrations, but not to the same degree as that for the 37 °C incubation. After 48 h incubation, the population of E. coli remained at 3.8, 3.1, 2.6, and 2.5 logs in samples treated with 20, 30, 40, and 50% PJ, respectively, compared to 5.3 log cfu mL−1 in the control. At 4 °C incubation temperature, there was only a slight change in the bacterial population in the 0, 10, 20, and 30% PJ concentrations over time (Table 1). It was found that the initial E. coli population at 4.9 logs was decreased to 4.1 or 3.7 log cfu mL−1 over 48 h incubation in the 40 and 50% PJ, respectively.

3.6. Lower pH and Higher Concentration of PJ Contribute to Antimicrobial Effect

Both bacteria were more effectively inhibited and/or killed in DW systems than in culture broth systems because of a lack of nutrients in DW to support bacterial growth, and the pH of DW systems was lowered by the addition of PJ to a greater degree ranging from 3.3 to 3.4 than that in culture broth systems ranging from 4–5 at 37 °C (Figure 3). The change of pH value due to the addition of PJ at 4 or 25 °C in DW and culture broth system was similar to that at 37 °C. In addition, we investigated the pH change and PJ concentration on E. coli growth in DW at 25 °C for 48 h (Figure 4) and found that pH values remained at 3.3–3.4 regardless of PJ concentration levels of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50%. However, the increase in juice concentration resulted in a decrease in the E. coli population following the 48 h incubation, suggesting that while pH was one of the factors contributing to the antimicrobial effect, other chemical components in PJ also played an important role in inhibiting and/or killing bacteria.

4. Discussion

Pomegranate fruits are known as a good source of healthy antioxidants, including polyphenols and anthocyanin [3,20]. While these active compounds are becoming increasingly popular for their health benefits, some of them also demonstrate antimicrobial properties for food preservation. Pomegranate and pomegranate extract can be in the form of liquid or powder; these natural ingredients extend the shelf life of food and beverage products without adverse effects on taste and visuals while, at the same time, allowing for convenience and safety [21,22]. Saeed et al. [18] reported that pomegranate peel extract was an effective antimicrobial coating material for tomatoes. They found that the coated tomatoes were firmer and had more lycopene content than the control, and the coating materials did not affect the sensory profile of tomatoes. In this study, the antibacterial potential of PJ at different concentrations against L. innocua and E. coli in both water and culture broth systems (to imitate food matrix) at 4, 25, and 37 °C (to reflect cold storage temperature, room temperature, and suitable temperature for growth of some bacteria, respectively) were investigated, which were different from the research reported previously. PJ showed antibacterial effects against Gram-positive L. innocua and Gram-negative E. coli, while both bacteria were inhibited and killed more effectively in DW systems than in culture broth systems. PJ has intrinsic characteristics with low pH values and high titratable acidity that create a hostile environment for bacterial growth and survival. Microbial response to acidic pH is a major factor controlling the growth and survival of bacteria in foods and acidic body environments [23]. L. innocua was found to be more sensitive to PJ than E. coli, as significant L. innocua reductions (p < 0.001) were shown following the additions of PJ for 6 h at three temperatures tested in DW systems. Gahan et al. [24] reported that the lethal acid stress for L. monocytogenes is at pH 3.5 without the treatment of adaptive acid tolerance response by using nutrient broth systems. The L. innocua did not tolerate the acidified conditions with limited nutrients. E. coli could better tolerate the lower pH in comparison to L. innocua. Miller and Kaspar [25] reported that E. coli O157:H7 could be detected in apple cider with a pH of 3.6 stored at 8 °C and was shown not to be destroyed within the shelf life of apple cider at pH 2 to 4. Nikaido [26] reported that the resistance mechanisms of Gram-negative bacteria to lower pH are more complicated than Gram-positive bacteria due to the different characteristics of their cell wall composition. As reported by Seltmann and Holst [27], the cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria has much more peptidoglycan than that of Gram-negative bacterial cells, providing increased rigidity. The difference in cell wall structures between Listeria spp. and E. coli may lead to different effects when the bacteria are subjected to antimicrobial compounds [28].
It is worth noting that the higher concentration of PJ showed greater antibacterial effects than the lower concentration of PJ at the same pH level (Figure 4). Bacterial reductions were measured at the higher PJ concentrations, implying that certain chemical compounds, such as phenolics in the PJ (measured at 1717.04 mg GAE L−1 in this study), also contribute to the antibacterial actions. The primary polyphenols of 4-Hydroxy-3-Methoxybenzoate, epicatechin, catechin, rutin, ferulic acid, P-coumaric acid, and cinnamic acid in pomegranate juice concentrate (PJC) were determined [29]. PJC demonstrated potential antibacterial effects on Streptococcus mutans and Aeromonas hydrophila. Wu et al. [30] studied the inhibitory activity of aqueous extracts of pomegranate peel products and juice powder against Salmonella enterica, indicating that the level of Salmonella population reduction correlated positively with the total polyphenolic content and titratable acidity in the treatment system. Phenolics with hydrophobicity could act efficiently at the bacterial membrane–water interface by embedding in the membrane, thereby impairing the cell membrane [31]. Apostolidis et al. [32] and Lin et al. [33] reported that phenolic phytochemicals and organic acids can cause hyper-acidification via proton donation at the plasma membrane interface of the microorganism and intracellular cytosolic acidification and exposure to low pH can cause sub-lethal injury to cell membranes, resulting in disruption of proton motive force owing to loss of H+-ATPase required for ATP synthesis. This damage may make the bacteria more susceptible to the phenolic compounds in the PJ. Türkyilmaz et al. [22] reported that the antimicrobial activities of PJ were due to tannins such as ellagitannins and other high molecular weight tannins. Reddy et al. [21] determined that gallagic acid and punicalagin could inhibit the growth of E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and C. neoformans with IC50 values lower than 15 µg mL−1.
Different treatment temperatures had impacts on the antimicrobial activities of PJ against L. innocua and E. coli. Higher incubation temperatures resulted in stronger bactericidal effects. In this study, both bacteria were less affected by PJ at 4 °C. With abundant nutrients and optimum temperature, the newly formed cells of the bacteria are active and multiply quickly. The cell wall of newly formed cells is more easily destroyed than that of older cells [34]. Aronsson [35] reported that phospholipids in bacterial cell membranes are closely packed into a rigid structure, but at high temperatures, they are arranged in a less ordered manner. This could be the reason for the increased antibacterial action of PJ at high temperatures. In addition, at high temperatures, bacterial cell membranes may assist in transporting organic acids into the cells [36].
Our study demonstrated the antimicrobial effects of PJ against L. innocua and E. coli in bacterial culture broth systems, suggesting that PJ has antimicrobial potential in the food system. Xylia et al. [37] also reported that the washing treatments with PJ (1:10) resulted in a significant decrease of E. coli and L. monocytogenes population on shredded carrots, while total carotenoids, ascorbic acid, total soluble solids, and titratable acidity were not different after six days of storage of samples. Pomegranate has been used in the food industry, including juice for drinking and its extract for extending the shelf life of foods. PJ and its extracts present high antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, which make them excellent candidates as natural additives or active compounds in the food and food packaging industries [38]. To better understand the mode of action of the antimicrobial properties of pomegranates, further investigation on bioactive compounds in pomegranates and the correlation between phenolic compounds and antimicrobial activity are needed. In addition, the potential applications of pomegranate juice/extract in food systems warrant more research.

5. Conclusions

The antimicrobial effects of PJ were dependent upon the juice concentration, culture conditions (temperature, matrix, and time), as well as bacterial species. Increased juice concentration and treatment temperature resulted in a greater antibacterial effect. L. innocua and E. coli were more effectively killed in the DW systems than in their culture broth, while L. innocua was more sensitive to PJ compared to E. coli. Low pH value and chemical compounds in PJ contributed to the antimicrobial effect. This study provides useful information for the food industry to develop pomegranate juice and/or its extracts as healthy food/beverage as well as natural food additives for food protection.

Author Contributions

Z.B. conducted experimental trials on pomegranate juice against L. innocua and E. coli in different media and drafted the manuscript. L.F. was responsible for study logistics and supervision, contributed to experimental design, data interpretation, review, and editing the manuscript. J.S. contributed to data interpretation and visualization, review, and editing. J.G. reviewed and edited the manuscript. S.F. contributed to experimental design and conducted formal analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (A-base research funding).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the MOE-AAFC Ph.D. training program for providing financial support and research funding to the student to conduct this research project. The authors also thank Craig Doucette and Timothy Hughes at the Kentville Research Development Centre, AAFC, for their technical support and assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. There is no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Christaki, E.V.; Bonos, E.M.; Florou-Paneri, P.C. Dietary benefits of pomegranates in humans and animals. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2011, 9, 142–144. [Google Scholar]
  2. Schwartz, E.; Tzulker, R.; Glazer, I.; Bar-Ya’akov, I.; Wiesman, Z.; Tripler, E.; Bar-Ilan, I.; Fromm, H.; Borochov-Neori, H.; Holland, D.; et al. Environmental conditions affect the color, taste, and antioxidant capacity of 11 pomegranate accessions’ fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 9197–9209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gómez Caravaca, A.M.; Verardo, V.; Toselli, M.; Segura Carretero, A.; Fernández Gutiérrez, A.; Caboni, M.F. Determination of the major phenolic compounds in pomegranate juices by HPLC−DAD−ESI-MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 5328–5337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lucas, D.L.; Were, L.M. Anti-listeria monocytogenes activity of heat-treated lyophilized pomegranate juice in media and in ground top round beef. J. Food Prot. 2009, 72, 2508–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shema-Didi, L.; Sela, S.; Ore, L.; Shapiro, G.; Geron, R.; Moshe, G.; Kristal, B. One year of pomegranate juice intake decreases oxidative stress, inflammation, and incidence of infections in hemodialysis patients: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 53, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Viuda-Martos, M.; Fernández-López, J.; Pérez-Álvarez, J.A. Pomegranate and its many functional components as related to human health: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2010, 9, 635–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nuñez De Gonzalez, M.T.; Keeton, J.T.; Acuff, G.R.; Ringer, L.J.; Lucia, L.M. Effectiveness of acidic calcium sulfate with propionic and lactic acid and lactates as postprocessing dipping solutions to control Listeria monocytogenes on frankfurters with or without potassium lactate and stored vacuum packaged at 4.5 °C. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 915–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vázquez-Boland, J.A.; Kuhn, M.; Berche, P.; Chakraborty, T.; Domínguez-Bernal, G.; Goebel, W.; González-Zorn, B.; Wehland, J.; Kreft, J. Listeria pathogenesis and molecular virulence determinants. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 14, 584–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gómez, D.; Ariño, A.; Carramiñana, J.J.; Rota, C.; Yangüela, J. Sponge versus mini-roller for the surface microbiological control of Listeria monocytogenes, total aerobic mesophiles and Enterobacteriaceae in the meat industry. Food Control 2012, 27, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Margolles, A.; Mayo, B.; De Los Reyes-Gavilán, C.G. Susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua strains isolated from short-ripened cheeses to some antibiotics and heavy metal salts. Food Microbiol. 2001, 18, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Conner, D.E.; Kotrola, J.S. Growth and survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 under acidic conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 382–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gabriel, A.A.; Nakano, H. Responses of E. coli O157:H7, L. monocytogenes 1/2 c and Salmonella enteritidis to pH, aw and temperature stress combinations. Food Control 2010, 21, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Doyle, M.P. Escherichia coli O157: H7 and its significance in foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1991, 12, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lang, M.M.; Harris, L.J.; Beuchat, L.R. Survival and recovery of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes on lettuce and parsley as affected by method of inoculation, time between inoculation and analysis, and treatment with chlorinated water. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 1092–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gould, G.W. Industry perspectives on the use of natural antimicrobials and inhibitors for food applications. J. Food Prot. 1996, 59, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De La Torre Torres, J.; Gassara, F.E.; Kouassi, A.P.; Brar, S.K.; Belkacemi, K. Spice use in food: Properties and benefits. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 1078–1088. [Google Scholar]
  17. Su, X.; Howell, A.B.; D’Souza, D.H. Antiviral effects of cranberry juice and cranberry proanthocyanidins on foodborne viral surrogates—A time dependence study in vitro. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 985–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Saeed, M.; Azam, M.; Ahmad, T.; Akhtar, S.; Hussain, M.; Nasir, S.; Ain, Q.U. Utilization of pomegranate peel extract as antifungal coating agent against Fusarium oxysporum on tomatoes. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e17157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kalt, W.; Howell, A.; Duy, J.C.; Forney, C.F.; McDonald, J.E. Horticultural factors affecting antioxidant capacity of blueberries and other small fruit. HortTechnology 2001, 11, 523–528. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kostka, T.; Ostberg-Potthoff, J.J.; Briviba, K.; Matsugo, S.; Winterhalter, P.; Esatbeyoglu, T. Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) extract and its anthocyanin and copigment fractions-free radical scavenging activity and influence on cellular oxidative stress. Foods 2020, 9, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Reddy, M.K.; Gupta, S.K.; Jacob, M.R.; Khan, S.I.; Ferreira, D. Antioxidant, antimalarial and antimicrobial activities of tannin-rich fractions, ellagitannins and phenolic acids from Punica granatum L. Planta Medica 2007, 73, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Türkyilmaz, M.; Taǧi, Ş.; Dereli, U.; Özkan, M. Effects of various pressing programs and yields on the antioxidant activity, antimicrobial activity, phenolic content and colour of pomegranate juices. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 1810–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kroll, R.; Patchett, R. Induced acid tolerance in Listeria monocytogenes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1992, 14, 224–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gahan, C.; O’Driscoll, B.; Hill, C. Acid adaptation of Listeria monocytogenes can enhance survival in acidic foods and during milk fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 3128–3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Miller, L.G.; Kaspar, C.W. Escherichia coli O157: H7 acid tolerance and survival in apple cider. J. Food Prot. 1994, 57, 460–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nikaido, H. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003, 67, 593–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Seltmann, G.; Holst, O. The Bacterial Cell Wall; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  28. Puupponen-Pimiä, R.; Nohynek, L.; Meier, C.; Kähkönen, M.; Heinonen, M.; Hopia, A.; Oksman-Caldentey, K.M. Antimicrobial properties of phenolic compounds from berries. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 90, 494–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Habib, H.M.; El-Gendi, H.; El-Fakharany, E.M.; El-Ziney, M.G.; El-Yazbi, A.F.; Al Meqbaali, F.T.; Ibrahim, W.H. Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, Antimicrobial, and Anticancer Activities of Pomegranate Juice Concentrate. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, W.; Mis Solval, K.; Chen, J. Inhibitory activity of aqueous extracts of pomegranate peel products and juice powder against Salmonella enterica. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 155, 112934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vattem, D.A.; Lin, Y.T.; Ghaedian, R.; Shetty, K. Cranberry synergies for dietary management of Helicobacter pylori infections. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 1583–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Apostolidis, E.; Kwon, Y.I.; Shetty, K. Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes by oregano, cranberry and sodium lactate combination in broth and cooked ground beef systems and likely mode of action through proline metabolism. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 128, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lin, Y.T.; Labbe, R.G.; Shetty, K. Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes in fish and meat systems by use of oregano and cranberry phytochemical synergies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 5672–5678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu VC, H.; Qiu, X.; Bushway, A.; Harper, L. Antibacterial effects of American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) concentrate on foodborne pathogens. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 1834–1841. [Google Scholar]
  35. Aronsson, K.; Rönner, U. Influence of pH, water activity and temperature on the inactivation of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae by pulsed electric fields. Inonovative Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2001, 2, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rahnayaka, R.M.U.S.K. Antibacterial effect of malic acid against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enteritidis and Escherichia coli in Mango, Pineapple and Papaya juices. Am. J. Food Technol. 2013, 8, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xylia, P.; Chrysargyris, A.; Botsaris, G.; Tzortzakis, N. Assessment of mint and pomegranate extracts/oils as antimicrobial agents to inhibit growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes on shredded carrots. Acta Hortic. 2021, 1323, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Andrade, M.A.; Lima, V.; Sanches Silva, A.; Vilarinho, F.; Castilho, M.C.; Khwaldia, K.; Ramos, F. Pomegranate and grape by-products and their active compounds: Are they a valuable source for food applications? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 86, 68–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 12 03247 g001
Figure 1. Antibacterial effect of pomegranate juice against L. innocua in: (a) BHI system at 37 °C, (b) BHI system at 25 °C, (c) DW system at 37 °C, and (d) DW system at 25 °C. The detection limit for L. innocua was <1 log cfu mL−1. Pomegranate juice concentrations are shown: (●) 0%, (▼) 10%, (■) 20%, (♦) 30%, (▲) 40%, (⬢) 50%. The vertical bars represent the standard errors of mean (SEM).
Figure 1. Antibacterial effect of pomegranate juice against L. innocua in: (a) BHI system at 37 °C, (b) BHI system at 25 °C, (c) DW system at 37 °C, and (d) DW system at 25 °C. The detection limit for L. innocua was <1 log cfu mL−1. Pomegranate juice concentrations are shown: (●) 0%, (▼) 10%, (■) 20%, (♦) 30%, (▲) 40%, (⬢) 50%. The vertical bars represent the standard errors of mean (SEM).
Foods 12 03247 g001
Foods 12 03247 g002
Figure 2. Antibacterial effect of pomegranate juice against E. coli in: (a) TSB system at 37 °C, (b) TSB system at 25 °C, (c) DW system at 37 °C, and (d) DW system at 25 °C. The detection limit for E. coli was <1 log cfu mL−1. Pomegranate juice concentrations are shown: (●) 0%, (▼) 10%, (■) 20%, (♦) 30%, (▲) 40%, (⬢) 50%. The vertical bars represent the standard errors of mean (SEM).
Figure 2. Antibacterial effect of pomegranate juice against E. coli in: (a) TSB system at 37 °C, (b) TSB system at 25 °C, (c) DW system at 37 °C, and (d) DW system at 25 °C. The detection limit for E. coli was <1 log cfu mL−1. Pomegranate juice concentrations are shown: (●) 0%, (▼) 10%, (■) 20%, (♦) 30%, (▲) 40%, (⬢) 50%. The vertical bars represent the standard errors of mean (SEM).
Foods 12 03247 g002
Foods 12 03247 g003
Figure 3. Changes of pH value with an addition of pomegranate juice in the bacterial culture broth or DW system at 37 °C, (a) (●) BHI or (▼) DW used for L. innocua, (b) (●) TSB or (▼) DW used for E. coli. The vertical bars represent the standard errors of mean (SEM).
Figure 3. Changes of pH value with an addition of pomegranate juice in the bacterial culture broth or DW system at 37 °C, (a) (●) BHI or (▼) DW used for L. innocua, (b) (●) TSB or (▼) DW used for E. coli. The vertical bars represent the standard errors of mean (SEM).
Foods 12 03247 g003
Foods 12 03247 g004
Figure 4. pH change and antimicrobial effect of pomegranate juice at different concentrations on E. coli population in DW system at 25 °C for 48 h. (●) pH values, (○) E. coli population. The vertical bars represent the standard errors of mean (SEM).
Figure 4. pH change and antimicrobial effect of pomegranate juice at different concentrations on E. coli population in DW system at 25 °C for 48 h. (●) pH values, (○) E. coli population. The vertical bars represent the standard errors of mean (SEM).
Foods 12 03247 g004
Table 1. Antibacterial effect of pomegranate juice against L. innocua and E. coli at 4 °C.
Table 1. Antibacterial effect of pomegranate juice against L. innocua and E. coli at 4 °C.
MediumConcentration (%)L. innocua Population
(log cfu mL−1) a		E. coli Population
(log cfu mL−1) a
0 h6 h24 h 48 h0 h6 h24 h48 h
BHI04.964.934.924.904.884.894.874.86
TSB b104.954.954.924.924.894.854.954.89
204.884.834.844.804.894.994.904.87
304.954.854.714.534.864.944.964.88
404.904.804.524.434.914.904.854.81
504.934.714.464.294.914.664.644.50
DW05.004.874.874.864.894.974.874.89
104.983.331.57- c4.914.894.834.81
204.783.441.56-4.854.884.844.83
304.803.502.18-4.854.874.684.67
404.823.431.66-4.864.594.224.11
504.883.501.76-4.884.193.903.76
a The experiments were repeated three times, and the data were expressed as means. b BHI: bacterial culture broth used for L. innocua; TSB: bacterial culture broth used for E. coli. c below the detection limit (<1 log cfu mL−1).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ban, Z.; Fan, L.; Song, J.; Fillmore, S.; Guan, J. Antibacterial Effect of Pomegranate Juice on Listeria innocua and E. coli in Different Media. Foods 2023, 12, 3247. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12173247

AMA Style

Ban Z, Fan L, Song J, Fillmore S, Guan J. Antibacterial Effect of Pomegranate Juice on Listeria innocua and E. coli in Different Media. Foods. 2023; 12(17):3247. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12173247

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ban, Zhaojun, Lihua Fan, Jun Song, Sherry Fillmore, and Junfeng Guan. 2023. "Antibacterial Effect of Pomegranate Juice on Listeria innocua and E. coli in Different Media" Foods 12, no. 17: 3247. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12173247

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop