Next Article in Journal
Metabolic Variations in Brown Rice Fertilised with Different Levels of Nitrogen
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication and Characterization of Eco-Friendly Polyelectrolyte Bilayer Films Based on Chitosan and Different Types of Edible Citrus Pectin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Key Aroma Volatile Compounds in Nine Different Grape Varieties Wine by Headspace Gas Chromatography–Ion Mobility Spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS), Odor Activity Values (OAV) and Sensory Analysis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Study on the Influence of the Use of Sulphur Dioxide, the Distillation System and the Aging Conditions on the Final Sensory Characteristics of Brandy

Foods 2022, 11(21), 3540; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11213540
by María Guerrero-Chanivet 1,2, Manuel J. Valcárcel-Muñoz 2, Dominico Antonio Guillén-Sánchez 1, Remedios Castro-Mejías 1, Enrique Durán-Guerrero 1, Carmen Rodríguez-Dodero 1,* and María de Valme García-Moreno 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Foods 2022, 11(21), 3540; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11213540
Submission received: 18 August 2022 / Revised: 22 September 2022 / Accepted: 3 November 2022 / Published: 7 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in Grape Derived Product Aroma and Flavour Chemistry)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In my opinion, this article is very interesting, the authors analyzed the effect of some variables on the sensory characteristics of brandy. The text is very clear.

Dear authors attached my few suggestions for improvement of the article:

 

Line 329: In Table 4. Chromatic characteristics and TPI of the young and aged spirits. IPT (mg/L G.A.E.) in place of TPI is reported.

 

References require standardization, sometimes a DOI number is given, sometimes not, why?

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

I am carefully reviewing the manuscript “A study on the influence of the use of sulphur dioxide, the distillation system and the aging conditions on the final sensory 3 characteristics of brandy”. In this manuscript, many enological factors involving different uses of SO2, distillation system and aging conditions were concerned. They were important but lack of innovation and careful design. This work is more like a technical test rather a scientific research.

Some comments and suggestions are shown below.

1.     Line 69-119. Too much factors concerned in this work (sulphur, the distillation system, the alcohol content during aging, the botanical origin of the aging casks and their toasting degree) But the sample design was too casual. What is the meaning of “light or medium toasted casks” in table 1.

2.     Line 120-137. Why did the authors do the analytical methodologies of TPI, cielab and aroma? How did the authors do the analysis of aroma? I did not find any analysis method about it. But the results did.  If the sensory analysis concerned color, aroma and palate sensation, the qualified chemical analysis methods should be designed here.

3.     Line 155-161. How did the QDA analysis perform? No information can be consulted about training of panel and generation of attributes.

4.     Table 3. The volatile compounds delivered were only alcohols and esters. However, in this work more attention should be paid in volatile phenols and toasted aromas. No compounds of them were analyzed.

5.     If the authors concerned the oak influence, the effect of ellagitannins on bitterness and astringency should analyze. One or two sensory attributes should be focused.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop