Musical and Non-Musical Sounds Influence the Flavour Perception of Chocolate Ice Cream and Emotional Responses
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Objectives
2. Materials and Method
2.1. Ice Cream Preparation and Presentation
2.2. Ethics Statement
2.3. Participants
2.4. Music and Sound Selection
2.4.1. Music Selection
2.4.2. Sound Selection
2.4.3. Selection of Music and Sound Mix
2.5. Temporal Dominance of Sensation (TDS)
Panel Familiarisation
2.6. Emotional Responses
2.6.1. Affective Responses
2.6.2. Measurement of Emotions
2.7. Experimental Procedure
2.8. Data Analysis
2.8.1. Temporal Dominance of Sensation (TDS) Curves
2.8.2. Measure of Affective States (Valence, Arousal, and Dominance; VAD)
2.8.3. Multidimensional Alignment (MDA)
2.8.4. Canonical Variate Analysis (CVA) of Sensory and Emotion Data
2.8.5. Partial Least Square Path Modelling (PLS-PM)
3. Results
3.1. Affective Dimensions
Changes in Affective Dimensions with Music and Sounds Stimulus
3.2. Effect of Music and Sound Conditions on Emotions Evoked
3.3. TDS Result
3.3.1. Silent Condition (Control)
3.3.2. LM Condition
3.3.3. DM Condition
3.3.4. PS Condition
3.3.5. US Condition
3.3.6. LMPS Condition
3.3.7. DMUS Condition
3.4. Canonical Variate Analysis (CVA) of Sensory and Emotional Responses to Chocolate Ice Cream Coinciding with Different Music and Sound Conditions
3.5. PLS-PM Analysis of Affective States, Emotion Measure, and Sensory Perception
4. Discussion
4.1. LM, PS, and LMPS Were Positive Consumption Conditions
4.2. DM, US, and DMUS Conditions Were High in Arousal after Consuming Chocolate Ice Cream
4.3. LM and LMPS Evoked More Positive Emotions than PS
4.4. Music and Sound Conditions Differing in Valence Influence the Dominance of Sensory Sensations When Consuming Chocolate Ice Cream
4.5. Relationship between Affective Response, Emotion and Sensory Perception
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix A.1. Musical Genres, Recording Artists, and Songs Used in the Current Study
Genre | Music Description | Song/Artist |
Classical | Piano, clearer texture, elegance | Snowmelt—EP Zoë Keating |
Folk | Transformative, uplifting, urbane | Traveller Chris Stapleton |
Alternative | Inventive, inspiring, sensual | Say Amen (Saturday Night) Panic! At The Disco |
Rock | Atmospheric, cluttering, mannered | Whatever It Takes Imagine Dragons |
Country | Heart-warming, guitar, country | Meant To Be Bebe Rexha & Florida Georgia Line |
Pop | Strong beat, invigorating, generic | Psycho Post Malone Featuring Ty Dolla $ign |
Soul | Rattling, raw, ghetto | Love Lies Khalid & Normani |
Blues | Gospel, radio like, emotional | Downey To Lubbock Dave Alvin And Jimmie Dale Gilmore |
Jazz | Swings, calm, slow | Laid Black Marcus Miller |
Heavy metal | Loud, sharp, metal | Zombie Bad Wolves |
Religious | Religious, calming, slow | Reckless Love Cory Asbury |
Funk | Groovy, 1980s-like | Finesse (Remix) [feat. Cardi B]—Single Bruno Mars |
Hip hop | Rapping, slow beats, rhythmic | Nice For What Drake |
Electronica | Electronic, dance, high beat | The Middle Zedd, Maren Morris & Grey |
Appendix A.2. Sounds Used in the Current Study
Appendix A.3. Description and Examples of Emotion Terms Used in This Study
Emotion Attribute | Examples | Description | |
Active | Positive | Drinking wine with friends or parents at a party | Engaging or ready to engage in physically energetic pursuits |
Annoyed | Negative | The store sold food that was out of date | Slightly angry; irritated |
Anxious | Negative | I made a big mistake, and the opponent took immediately advantage of my mistake | Feeling or showing worry, nervousness, or unease about something with an uncertain outcome |
At ease | Positive | Having holiday with family | Free from worry or awkwardness; relaxed |
Boredom | Negative | One can be bored by eating traditional meals; simple biscuits, tasteless and dry | Feeling bored |
Calm | Positive | An atmosphere where no one is fighting or arguing and there is no stress or tension | Not showing or feeling nervousness, anger, or other strong emotions |
Energetic | Positive | A person who is very active and does not feel tired easily. | Showing or involving great activity or vitality |
Enthusiastic | Positive | Cheerful picture and graphics; drinking at a party | Having or showing intense and eager enjoyment, interest, or approval |
Excited | Positive | A barking dog when the mailman comes to the door | Very enthusiastic and eager |
Interested | Positive | Feel like eating the product; curious about taste | Having an interest or involvement; not impartial |
Joy | Positive | Happy with product information; strong smell makes you happy; cheerful picture and graphics | A feeling of great pleasure and happiness |
Lonely | Negative | Eating or drinking alone | Sad because one has no friends or company |
Pleasant | Positive | Drinking wine with friends or parents | Giving a sense of happy satisfaction or enjoyment |
Relaxed | Positive | Walking on the beach; water, after or during sports activities | Free from tension and anxiety |
Restless | Negative | You cannot sit down and instead pace around more | Unable to rest or relax as a result of anxiety or boredom |
Satisfied | Positive | I am satisfied after my late lunch; I am very satisfied with the flavour of the food. | Peaceful, happiness, calm, feeling when an outcome is above expectations. |
Tired | Negative | Working for 12 h without a break | In need of sleep or rest |
Unable to concentrate | Negative | Reading at a noisy bus stop | Can’t focus all one’s attention on a particular object or activity |
Uneasy | Negative | A person sitting in a chair with only three legs | Causing or feeling anxiety; troubled or uncomfortable |
Unhappy | Negative | Food perceived as being too watery and artificial | Not happy |
Appendix A.4. Frequency of CATA Terms Used by Panellists to Describe the Emotion Responses and Cochran Q Test Results for Comparison between Conditions
No. | Emotion | Silent | LM | DM | US | US | LMPS | DMUS | Q Value | |
1 | Pleasant | Positive | 0.563 B | 0.703 B | 0.250 A | 0.750 B | 0.219 A | 0.719 B | 0.094 A | 123.42 *** |
2 | Interested | Positive | 0.422 BC | 0.500 C | 0.219 AB | 0.203 AB | 0.109 A | 0.406 BC | 0.109 A | 57.48 *** |
3 | Joy | Positive | 0.375 BC | 0.609 CD | 0.266 AB | 0.453 BCD | 0.047 A | 0.625 D | 0.094 A | 94.88 *** |
4 | Relaxed | Positive | 0.484 B | 0.578 B | 0.203 A | 0.594 B | 0.125 A | 0.625 B | 0.156 A | 81.32 *** |
5 | Active | Positive | 0.344 BCD | 0.547 D | 0.234 ABC | 0.109 A | 0.063 A | 0.438 CD | 0.125 AB | 69.49 *** |
6 | Calm | Positive | 0.328 BCD | 0.391 CD | 0.172 ABC | 0.781 E | 0.109 AB | 0.516 D | 0.047 A | 121.05 *** |
7 | Satisfied | Neutral | 0.641 D | 0.5 CD | 0.203 AB | 0.391 BC | 0.109 A | 0.5 CD | 0.109 A | 80.19 *** |
8 | Enthusiastic | Positive | 0.109 AB | 0.234 B | 0.094 AB | 0.047 A | 0.016 A | 0.141 AB | 0.031 A | 28.72 *** |
9 | Energetic | Positive | 0.188 AB | 0.375 B | 0.156 A | 0.094 A | 0.094 A | 0.234 AB | 0.125 A | 28.75 *** |
10 | At ease | Positive | 0.266 AB | 0.375 BC | 0.094 A | 0.578 C | 0.109 A | 0.422 BC | 0.063 A | 78.45 *** |
11 | Unable to concentrate | Negative | 0.063 A | 0.094 A | 0.531 B | 0.015 A | 0.015 A | 0.125 A | 0.688 B | 115.98 *** |
12 | Annoyed | Negative | 0.016 A | 0.063 A | 0.453 B | 0.016 A | 0.547 BC | 0.094 A | 0.719 C | 171.72 *** |
13 | Restless | Negative | 0.031 A | 0.063 A | 0.406 B | 0.031 A | 0.438 B | 0.094 A | 0.594 A | 120.92 *** |
14 | Tired | Negative | 0.063 A | 0.031 A | 0.297 B | 0.047 A | 0.219 AB | 0.094 A | 0.406 B | 63.33 *** |
15 | Uneasy | Negative | 0.016 A | 0.047 A | 0.375 BC | 0.016 A | 0.328 B | 0.094 A | 0.563 C | 118.47 *** |
16 | Unhappy | Negative | 0 A | 0.063 AB | 0.422 C | 0.031 AB | 0.219 B | 0.031 AB | 0.5 C | 117.57 *** |
17 | Anxious | Negative | 0.016 A | 0.031 AB | 0.203 B | 0.016 A | 0.188 AB | 0.078 AB | 0.406 C | 73.24 *** |
18 | Boredom | Negative | 0.109 AB | 0.047 A | 0.281 BC | 0.063 A | 0.203 ABC | 0.031 A | 0.375 C | 57.10 *** |
19 | Lonely | Negative | 0.078 A | 0.063 A | 0.141 A | 0.078 A | 0.125 A | 0.094 A | 0.203 A | 9.97 |
20 | Excited | Positive | 0.094 AB | 0.234 B | 0.156 AB | 0.047 A | 0.063 A | 0.156 AB | 0.063 A | 20.59 ** |
References
- Spence, C. The neuroscience of flavor. In Multisensory Flavor Perception; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 235–248. [Google Scholar]
- Kantono, K.; Hamid, N.; Shepherd, D.; Lin, Y.H.T.; Yakuncheva, S.; Yoo, M.J.; Grazioli, G.; Carr, B.T. The influence of auditory and visual stimuli on the pleasantness of chocolate gelati. Food Qual. Prefer. 2016, 53, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.H.T.; Hamid, N.; Shepherd, D.; Kantono, K.; Spence, C. Environmental sounds influence the multisensory perception of chocolate gelati. Foods 2019, 8, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Xu, Y.; Hamid, N.; Shepherd, D.; Kantono, K.; Reay, S.; Martinez, G.; Spence, C. Background soundscapes influence the perception of ice-cream as indexed by electrophysiological measures. Food Res. Int. 2019, 125, 108564. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Y.; Hamid, N.; Shepherd, D.; Kantono, K.; Spence, C. Changes in flavour, emotion, and electrophysiological measurements when consuming chocolate ice cream in different eating environments. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 77, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kantono, K.; Hamid, N.; Shepherd, D.; Yoo, M.J.; Carr, B.T.; Grazioli, G. The effect of background music on food pleasantness ratings. Psychol. Music 2016, 44, 1111–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kantono, K.; Hamid, N.; Shepherd, D.; Lin, Y.H.T.; Brard, C.; Grazioli, G.; Carr, B.T. The effect of music on gelato perception in different eating contexts. Food Res. Int. 2018, 113, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kantono, K.; Hamid, N.; Shepherd, D.; Lin, Y.H.T.; Skiredj, S.; Carr, B.T. Emotional and electrophysiological measures correlate to flavour perception in the presence of music. Physiol. Behav. 2019, 199, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kantono, K.; Hamid, N.; Shepherd, D.; Yoo, M.J.; Grazioli, G.; Carr, B.T. Listening to music can influence hedonic and sensory perceptions of gelati. Appetite 2016, 100, 244–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koelsch, S.; Skouras, S.; Fritz, T.; Herrera, P.; Bonhage, C.; Küssner, M.B.; Jacobs, A.M. The roles of superficial amygdala and auditory cortex in music-evoked fear and joy. Neuroimage 2013, 81, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, X.; Tang, J.; Zhu, P.; Guo, F.; Cai, J.; Zhang, H. Spatial variations in pedestrian soundscape evaluation of traffic noise. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2020, 83, 106399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vitale, C.; De Stefano, P.; Lolatto, R.; Bianchi, A.M. Physiological responses related to pleasant and unpleasant sounds. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 20th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), Palermo, Italy, 16–18 June 2020; pp. 330–334. [Google Scholar]
- Gunaratne, T.M.; Fuentes, S.; Gunaratne, N.M.; Torrico, D.D.; Gonzalez Viejo, C.; Dunshea, F.R. Physiological responses to basic tastes for sensory evaluation of chocolate using biometric techniques. Foods 2019, 8, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Jager, G.; Schlich, P.; Tijssen, I.; Yao, J.; Visalli, M.; De Graaf, C.; Stieger, M. Temporal dominance of emotions: Measuring dynamics of food-related emotions during consumption. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 37, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, F.R.; Wang, Q.J.; Van Ee, R.; Persoone, D.; Spence, C. “Smooth operator”: Music modulates the perceived creaminess, sweetness, and bitterness of chocolate. Appetite 2017, 108, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wang, Q.; Spence, C. Assessing the influence of music on wine perception among wine professionals. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Thomson, D.M.; Crocker, C.; Marketo, C.G. Linking sensory characteristics to emotions: An example using dark chocolate. Food Qual. Prefer. 2010, 21, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunaratne, T.M.; Viejo, C.G.; Fuentes, S.; Torrico, D.D.; Gunaratne, N.M.; Ashman, H.; Dunshea, F.R. Development of emotion lexicons to describe chocolate using the Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) methodology across Asian and Western groups. Food Res. Int. 2019, 115, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, W.; Thompson, W.F. Human emotions track changes in the acoustic environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 14563–14568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Krzywicka, P.; Byrka, K. Restorative qualities of and preference for natural and urban soundscapes. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Flores-Gutiérrez, E.O.; Díaz, J.-L.; Barrios, F.A.; Favila-Humara, R.; Guevara, M.Á.; del Río-Portilla, Y.; Corsi-Cabrera, M. Metabolic and electric brain patterns during pleasant and unpleasant emotions induced by music masterpieces. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 65, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bower, J.A.; Baxter, I.A. Sensory properties and consumer perception of ‘home-made’and commercial dairy ice cream. J. Sens. Stud. 2003, 18, 217–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacFie, H.J.; Bratchell, N.; GREENHOFF, K.; Vallis, L.V. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. J. Sens. Stud. 1989, 4, 129–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenny, D.A. Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences; Little, Brown: Boston, MA, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Rentfrow, P.J.; Gosling, S.D. The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 84, 1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pineau, N.; Cordelle, S.; Imbert, A.; Rogeaux, M.; Schlich, P. Dominance temporelle des sensations-Codage et analyse d’un nouveau type de données sensorielles. In Proceedings of the 35th Journées de statistique, Lyon, France, 2–6 June 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Pineau, N.; Schlich, P.; Cordelle, S.; Mathonnière, C.; Issanchou, S.; Imbert, A.; Rogeaux, M.; Etiévant, P.; Köster, E. Temporal Dominance of Sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time–intensity. Food Qual. Prefer. 2009, 20, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galmarini, M.V.; Paz, R.S.; Choquehuanca, D.E.; Zamora, M.C.; Mesz, B. Impact of music on the dynamic perception of coffee and evoked emotions evaluated by temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) and emotions (TDE). Food Res. Int. 2021, 150, 110795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hutchings, S.C.; de Casanove, A.; Schlich, P.; O’Riordan, D. The effect of training on the temporal dominance of sensations method: A study with milk protein hydrolysates. J. Sens. Stud. 2017, 32, e12303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labbe, D.; Schlich, P.; Pineau, N.; Gilbert, F.; Martin, N. Temporal dominance of sensations and sensory profiling: A comparative study. Food Qual. Prefer. 2009, 20, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russell, J.A.; Mehrabian, A. Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. J. Res. Personal. 1977, 11, 273–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, M.; Chaya, C.; Hort, J. Beyond liking: Comparing the measurement of emotional response using EsSense Profile and consumer defined check-all-that-apply methodologies. Food Qual. Prefer. 2013, 28, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warriner, A.B.; Kuperman, V.; Brysbaert, M. Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behav. Res. Methods 2013, 45, 1191–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McNair, D.M.; Lorr, M.; Droppleman, L.F. Manual Profile of Mood States; Eucational and Industrial Testing Service: San Diego, CA, USA, 1971. [Google Scholar]
- Lubin, B.; Zuckerman, M. Manual for the MAACL-R: Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised; EdITS/Educational and Industrial Testing Service: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Watson, D.; Clark, L.A.; Tellegen, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1988, 54, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scherer, K.R. What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Soc. Sci. Inf. 2005, 44, 695–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ares, G.; Jaeger, S.R.; Antúnez, L.; Vidal, L.; Giménez, A.; Coste, B.; Picallo, A.; Castura, J.C. Comparison of TCATA and TDS for dynamic sensory characterization of food products. Food Res. Int. 2015, 78, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carr, B.; Dzuroska, J.; Taylor, R.; Lanza, K.; Pansini, C. Multidimensional alignment (MDA): A simple numerical tool for assessing the degree of association between products and attributes on perceptual maps. In Proceedings of the Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, Florence, Italy, 26–30 July 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Meyners, M.; Castura, J.C.; Carr, B.T. Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data. Food Qual. Prefer. 2013, 30, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delarue, J.; Sieffermann, J.-M. Sensory mapping using Flash profile. Comparison with a conventional descriptive method for the evaluation of the flavour of fruit dairy products. Food Qual. Prefer. 2004, 15, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Sarstedt, M. Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Comput. Stat. 2013, 28, 565–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nunnally, J.; Bernstein, I. Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1967. [Google Scholar]
- da Veiga, G.C.; Johann, G.; Lima, V.A.; Kaushik, N.; Mitterer-Daltoé, M.L. Food Choice Questionnaire and PLS-Path modeling as tools to understand interest in low sugar products. J. Sens. Stud. 2021, 36, e12667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menichelli, E.; Hersleth, M.; Almøy, T.; Næs, T. Alternative methods for combining information about products, consumers and consumers’ acceptance based on path modelling. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 31, 142–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M.; Straub, D.W. Editor’s comments: A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in “MIS Quarterly”. MIS Q. 2012, 36, iii–xiv. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- North, A.; Hargreaves, D. The Social and Applied Psychology of Music; OUP Oxford: Oxford, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Koelsch, S. Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koelsch, S.; Fritz, T.; Cramon, D.Y.v.; Müller, K.; Friederici, A.D. Investigating emotion with music: An fMRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2006, 27, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thayer, J.F.; Lane, R.D. A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion regulation and dysregulation. J. Affect. Disord. 2000, 61, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gaver, W.W. What in the world do we hear?: An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecol. Psychol. 1993, 5, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray, J.A. Précis of The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Behav. Brain Sci. 1982, 5, 469–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sensory Attributes | Description | Reference Standard |
---|---|---|
Sweet (taste) | Taste associated with sugar | Hershey milk chocolate |
Bitter (taste) | Taste associated with caffeine or quinine solutions | Hershey dark chocolate |
Cocoa (flavour) | Characteristic flavour associated with cocoa | Hershey milk chocolate |
Milky (flavour) | Characteristic flavour associated with milk | Fresh milk (Anchor™, New Zealand) |
Creamy (texture) | Texture associated with cream | Fresh cream (Anchor™, New Zealand) |
Vanilla (flavour) | A woody, slightly chemical aroma associated with vanilla bean | Heilala Vanilla pure vanilla extract + fresh milk (Anchor™, New Zealand) |
Roasted (flavour) | A burnt, somewhat bitter character present in a product that has been cooked at a high temperature, typical of very strong dark coffee | Hershey milk chocolate + three highly roasted coffee beans |
Silent | LM | DM | PS | US | LMPS | DMUS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Valence | 0.891 | 0.769 | −0.983 | 0.885 | −0.883 | 0.919 | −0.960 |
Arousal | −0.804 | −0.788 | 0.912 | −0.821 | 0.953 | −0.951 | 0.897 |
Pleasant (+) | 0.832 | 0.785 | −0.972 | 0.908 | −0.880 | 0.936 | −0.973 |
Interested (+) | 0.921 | 0.927 | −0.727 | 0.364 | −0.835 | 0.819 | −0.835 |
Joy (+) | 0.806 | 0.918 | −0.867 | 0.733 | −0.970 | 0.979 | −0.949 |
Relaxed (+) | 0.862 | 0.804 | −0.976 | 0.885 | −0.932 | 0.961 | −0.964 |
Active (+) | 0.734 | 0.913 | −0.541 | 0.145 | −0.751 | 0.731 | −0.686 |
Calm (+) | 0.591 | 0.507 | −0.844 | 0.998 | −0.732 | 0.768 | −0.806 |
Satisfied (N) | 0.998 | 0.782 | −0.853 | 0.612 | −0.857 | 0.833 | −0.878 |
Enthusiastic (+) | 0.658 | 0.934 | −0.505 | 0.170 | −0.743 | 0.698 | −0.686 |
Energetic (+) | 0.586 | 0.880 | −0.444 | 0.042 | −0.618 | 0.606 | −0.588 |
At ease (+) | 0.639 | 0.594 | −0.907 | 0.986 | −0.767 | 0.826 | −0.852 |
Unable to concentrate (−) | −0.883 | −0.871 | 0.929 | −0.812 | 0.985 | −0.961 | 0.961 |
Annoyed (−) | −0.904 | −0.890 | 0.912 | −0.787 | 0.986 | −0.961 | 0.975 |
Restless (−) | −0.908 | −0.896 | 0.929 | −0.791 | 0.981 | −0.969 | 0.981 |
Tired (−) | −0.872 | −0.914 | 0.950 | −0.776 | 0.911 | −0.960 | 0.991 |
Uneasy (−) | −0.914 | −0.888 | 0.952 | −0.805 | 0.941 | −0.961 | 0.997 |
Unhappy (−) | −0.893 | −0.829 | 0.981 | −0.773 | 0.844 | −0.944 | 0.960 |
Anxious (−) | −0.884 | −0.875 | 0.898 | −0.775 | 0.894 | −0.919 | 0.988 |
Boredom (−) | −0.781 | −0.897 | 0.926 | −0.752 | 0.882 | −0.981 | 0.958 |
Lonely (−) | −0.827 | −0.966 | 0.859 | −0.677 | 0.918 | −0.942 | 0.968 |
Excited (+) | 0.428 | 0.828 | −0.346 | 0.166 | −0.618 | 0.580 | −0.599 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lin, Y.H.T.; Hamid, N.; Shepherd, D.; Kantono, K.; Spence, C. Musical and Non-Musical Sounds Influence the Flavour Perception of Chocolate Ice Cream and Emotional Responses. Foods 2022, 11, 1784. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11121784
Lin YHT, Hamid N, Shepherd D, Kantono K, Spence C. Musical and Non-Musical Sounds Influence the Flavour Perception of Chocolate Ice Cream and Emotional Responses. Foods. 2022; 11(12):1784. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11121784
Chicago/Turabian StyleLin, Yi Hsuan Tiffany, Nazimah Hamid, Daniel Shepherd, Kevin Kantono, and Charles Spence. 2022. "Musical and Non-Musical Sounds Influence the Flavour Perception of Chocolate Ice Cream and Emotional Responses" Foods 11, no. 12: 1784. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11121784
APA StyleLin, Y. H. T., Hamid, N., Shepherd, D., Kantono, K., & Spence, C. (2022). Musical and Non-Musical Sounds Influence the Flavour Perception of Chocolate Ice Cream and Emotional Responses. Foods, 11(12), 1784. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11121784