Next Article in Journal
Spoilage Investigation of Chill Stored Meagre (Argyrosomus regius) Using Modern Microbiological and Analytical Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
Ultra-Processed Food Impairs Bone Quality, Increases Marrow Adiposity and Alters Gut Microbiome in Mice
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

From Soil to Grape and Wine: Geographical Variations in Elemental Profiles in Different Chinese Regions

Foods 2021, 10(12), 3108; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10123108
by Xiaoyun Hao 1, Feifei Gao 1, Hao Wu 2, Yangbo Song 3, Liang Zhang 1, Hua Li 1,4,5,6 and Hua Wang 1,4,5,6,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Foods 2021, 10(12), 3108; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10123108
Submission received: 16 September 2021 / Revised: 9 December 2021 / Accepted: 12 December 2021 / Published: 15 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Food Analytical Methods)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The Contribution titled  From soil to grape and wine: the geographical variation of elemental profile in China is focused on comparisons among elements in soils, grape berries, and wines from six regions. The relationships between BCF and environmental factors (temperature, humidity, etc.) were investigated to obtain the mineral elemental profiles that close relative to the geographical origins

From the point of view of viticultural practice, the topic brings current knowledge. The paper is prepared at a good level, however, I would recommend the authors to complete the discussions, especially in the part focused on Li, Sr and K, which is insufficiently commented. In particular, I consider the conclusion to be insufficient, which should emphasize the main benefits of the results for production practice. Several errors also contain a list of References.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This study might be interesting, but the analytical methods have not carefully assessed and validated, hence the results proposed are likely affected by systematic errors. Also the quality of the data presentation (both as tables as well as in figures) is far to be acceptable. Univariate correlations must be replaced by a much more informative multivariate approach (e.g. PCA). Specific comments, remarks and suggestions are reported as sticky notes in the enclosed files.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have in part kept into consideration my suggestions. However, at least two otf them have not conveniently addressed.

1) Data in the tables are still not harmonized according uncertainty. Some examples: Table 2, Cs, 6.6±0.4 and NOT 6.64±0.44; Al, 12000±6000 and NOT 11600±6200...and so on. Please correct in this way throughout the paper.

2) PCA is necessary in this paper. Variability among concentrations of different matrices/elements can be overcome by centering/autoscaling data. 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Back to TopTop