Next Article in Journal
Trust in Public Relations in the Age of Mistrusted Media: A European Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Preprints in Chemistry: An Exploratory Analysis of Differences with Journal Articles
Perspective

Conflicts of Interest Arising from Simultaneous Service by Editors of Competing Journals or Publishers

Independent Researcher, P.O. Box 7, Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa-ken 761-0799, Japan
Publications 2021, 9(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010006
Received: 8 December 2020 / Revised: 2 February 2021 / Accepted: 3 February 2021 / Published: 8 February 2021
In this day and age of challenging post-publication peer review and heightened academic scrutiny, editors serve an increasingly important role in screening submissions and managing the quality of information that is published in scholarly journals. Publishers compete for an intellectual market while commercial publishers compete for a commercial share of the market. The assumption argued in this perspective is that having editorial positions in competing journals or publishers (CJPs) may represent competing intellectual, professional and/or financial interests. Thus, based on this assumption, an editor would be expected to show loyalty to a single entity (journal or publisher). Editorial positions on the editorial boards of CJPs, as well as conflicts, financial or other, should be clearly indicated for all editors on the editorial board page of a journal’s website, for transparency. In science and academia, based on these arguments, the author is of the belief that editors should thus generally not serve on the editorial boards of CJPs, or only under limited and fully transparent conditions, even if they serve as editors voluntarily. The author recognizes that not all academics, including editors, might agree with this perspective, so a wider debate is encouraged. View Full-Text
Keywords: accountability; bias; collective self-deception; conflict of interest; editorial responsibility; open access mega journal; peer review and post-publication peer review; predatory publishing; quality control; transparency accountability; bias; collective self-deception; conflict of interest; editorial responsibility; open access mega journal; peer review and post-publication peer review; predatory publishing; quality control; transparency
MDPI and ACS Style

Teixeira da Silva, J.A. Conflicts of Interest Arising from Simultaneous Service by Editors of Competing Journals or Publishers. Publications 2021, 9, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010006

AMA Style

Teixeira da Silva JA. Conflicts of Interest Arising from Simultaneous Service by Editors of Competing Journals or Publishers. Publications. 2021; 9(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. 2021. "Conflicts of Interest Arising from Simultaneous Service by Editors of Competing Journals or Publishers" Publications 9, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010006

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop