Next Article in Journal
Understanding Connections: Examining Digital Library and Institutional Repository Use Overlap
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantifying the Growth of Preprint Services Hosted by the Center for Open Science
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Verified, Shared, Modular, and Provenance Based Research Communication with the Dat Protocol
Open AccessCase Report

Enabling A Conversation Across Scholarly Monographs through Open Annotation

1
Göttingen State and University Library, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
2
MIT Knowledge Futures Group, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Publications 2019, 7(2), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020041
Received: 7 May 2019 / Revised: 22 May 2019 / Accepted: 28 May 2019 / Published: 8 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Frontiers for Openness in Scholarly Publishing)
The digital format opens up new possibilities for interaction with monographic publications. In particular, annotation tools make it possible to broaden the discussion on the content of a book, to suggest new ideas, to report errors or inaccuracies, and to conduct open peer reviews. However, this requires the support of the users who might not yet be familiar with the annotation of digital documents. This paper will give concrete examples and recommendations for exploiting the potential of annotation in academic research and teaching. After presenting the annotation tool of Hypothesis, the article focuses on its use in the context of HIRMEOS (High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science Infrastructure), a project aimed to improve the Open Access digital monograph. The general line and the aims of a post-peer review experiment with the annotation tool, as well as its usage in didactic activities concerning monographic publications are presented and proposed as potential best practices for similar annotation activities. View Full-Text
Keywords: open annotation; monographs; open access; higher education; open peer review open annotation; monographs; open access; higher education; open peer review
MDPI and ACS Style

Bertino, A.C.; Staines, H. Enabling A Conversation Across Scholarly Monographs through Open Annotation. Publications 2019, 7, 41.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop