Next Article in Journal
Publish-and-Flourish: Using Blockchain Platform to Enable Cooperative Scholarly Communication
Previous Article in Journal
English as the Language for Academic Publication: on Equity, Disadvantage and ‘Non-Nativeness’ as a Red Herring
Open AccessArticle

Scientific Production and Productivity for Characterizing an Author’s Publication History: Simple and Nested Gini’s and Hirsch’s Indexes Combined

Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Università di Bologna, via Angherà 22, 47921 Rimini, Italy
Publications 2019, 7(2), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020032
Received: 5 December 2018 / Revised: 9 April 2019 / Accepted: 22 April 2019 / Published: 4 May 2019
In this study, I developed operational versions of Gini’s and Hirsch’s indexes that can be applied to characterize each researcher’s publication history (PH) as heterodox, orthodox, and interdisciplinary. In addition, the new indicators warn against anomalies that potentially arise from tactical or opportunistic citation and publication behaviors by authors and editors, and can be calculated from readily available information. I split the original Hirsch index into nested indexes to isolate networking activity, as well as to distinguish scientific production (number of articles) from scientific productivity (rate of production), and used nested Gini indexes to identify intentional and successful intertopical and interdisciplinary research. I applied the most popular standardizations (i.e., per author and per year), and used simple methodologies (i.e., least-squares linear and cubic fitting, whole-career vs. subperiods, two-dimensional graphs). I provide three representative numerical examples based on an orthodox multidisciplinary PH, a heterodox PH from the social sciences, and an orthodox unidisciplinary PH from the physical sciences. Two additional numerical examples based on PHs from the life and health sciences show that the suggested PH characterization can be applied to different disciplines where different publication and citation practices prevail. Software is provided to help readers explore the use of these indicators. View Full-Text
Keywords: bibliometric ranking; scientific productivity; scientific production; H index; interdisciplinary research; heterodox research bibliometric ranking; scientific productivity; scientific production; H index; interdisciplinary research; heterodox research
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zagonari, F. Scientific Production and Productivity for Characterizing an Author’s Publication History: Simple and Nested Gini’s and Hirsch’s Indexes Combined. Publications 2019, 7, 32.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop